Upload
ruth-kennedy
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REINTEGRATION and AFTERCARE
First exchange visit
Milan, 29-30 June and 1 July 2014
1
Reintegration
• The Criminal Justice legislative framework in England and Wales is currently going through radical reform:– 35 Public Sector Probation Services are being replaced by 21
‘Community Rehabilitation Companies’– Private sector, co-ops/mutuals and VCSE are currently bidding
for these large contracts– It is envisaged that the winners will establish a ‘supply chain’ of
smaller providers (regional and local)
2
Reintegration
• UK legislative framework distinguishes between co-ops/mutuals:– Co-operative Societies (member owned)– Community Benefit Societies (operate for the benefit of the
community and can be charitable)
• AND social enterprises– Community Interest Companies (CICs), not necessarily member
based AND 1 share, 1 vote (rather than 1 member, 1 vote)
3
Reintegration
• Community punishment increasingly used as an option:– Curfew and exclusion methods: electronic tagging– Community Payback: the offender completes unpaid work such
as improving run down areas, clearing litter/graffiti
• Community payback case study: Moss Lodge– Former unoccupied haulage yard which was contaminated– Partnership between Council and Probation service– Site cleared and landscaped creating a community space
4
One Idea, One Project
• Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA):– A mutual/co-operative approach to supervision, support and
reintegration of sex offenders in particular (but increasingly used with other groups)
– Groups of volunteers with professional supervision to support offenders to reintegrate into society
– COSA projects exist in Canada, UK and the USA
5
One Idea, One Project
• Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA):
– Based on restorative justice principles– Each circle involves 4-6 trained volunteers from the community forming a circle
around the ex-offender (the core member)– The circle receives training and support from professionals (the outer circle)– The inner circle meets regularly to assist in the core member’s needs: medical
services, social networks, employment/housing as well as emotional support– Also to challenge the behaviours and attitudes that are related to the offending
cycle
6
One Idea, One Project
• Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA):
– Partnership with local community, criminal justice professionals and the ‘core’ member
– They operate as an informal multi-stakeholder co-op/mutual– Evaluations of COSA indicate that participation by the core
member can reduce sexual offences by as much as 70% in relation to predictions following a risk assessment
7
Our advice
• Move away from imprisonment:
– Better targeting of imprisonment and ensuring it is more effective. Reserved for offences that are so serious that no other form of punishment is suitable
– Paying back in the community should become the default position in dealing with less serious offences
8
Our advice
• Take note of the Scottish Prisons Commission, 2008– 3 stage approach to sentencing and ‘paying back’
1. Judge makes a judgement about the level of penalty
2. What form of reparation is appropriate. Involves a dialogue between judge, probation, community payback staff and the offender
3. Checking up on the process. Report proposes the establishment of a progress court
9
Our advice
• New rules/emphasis for Community Payback:– Ensuring that community based sentences provide rehabilitative
and reparative interventions rather than just PUNITIVE ones– Payback may involve making good to the victim and/or the
community:• Financial reparations• Unpaid work• Rehabilitative work
10