REGULAR BOARD MEETING - St Lucie TPOCouncilwoman Morgan rema rked that Mr. Ribaric had presented several more alternatives than had been included within the agenda packet and requested

Transportation Planning for Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie Village and St. Lucie County

Coco Vista Centre 466 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd, Suite 111

Port St. Lucie, Florida 34953 772-462-1593 www.stlucietpo.org

REGULAR BOARD MEETING

Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:00 pm

AGENDA 1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Roll Call

4. Comments from the Public

5. Comments from Advisory Committee Members (TAC/CAC/BPAC)

6. Approval of Agenda

7. Approval of Meeting Summary

October 3, 2018 Regular Board Meeting

8. Consent Agenda

8a. 2019 Meeting Dates: Approval of the proposed 2019 meeting dates for the

St. Lucie TPO Board.

Action: Approve or disapprove.

9. Action Items

9a. Annual Officer Elections and Appointments: Elections of a Chairperson

and a Vice-Chairperson for the St. Lucie TPO and appointments of Board

Members to various committees.

Action: Elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson and confirm or approve

the appointments of Board Members to the committees.

9b. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) FY 2019/20 -

FY 2023/24 Draft Tentative Work Program (DTWP): Presentation of the

DTWP for the St. Lucie TPO area for FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24 and updates of

TPO Priority Projects.

Action: Endorse the FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24 DTWP, endorse with

conditions, or do not endorse.

December 5, 2018 Regular Board Meeting Page 2 of 2

9c. 2019 Legislative Priorities: Review and adoption of the proposed

Legislative Priorities for the St. Lucie TPO for 2019.

Action: Adopt the proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities, adopt with conditions,

or do not adopt.

9d. Safety Performance Targets: Review and adoption of the safety

performance targets of the St. Lucie TPO for 2019.

Action: Adopt the 2019 Safety Performance Targets, adopt with conditions,

or do not adopt.

10. Discussion Items

10a. Local Incentive Program for Project Advancement (LIPPA): An update

on the development of the proposed LIPPA.

Action: Discuss and provide comments to Staff.

11 FDOT Comments

12. Recommendations/Comments by Members

13. TPO Staff Comments

14. Next Meeting: Subject to Agenda Item 8a, the next St. Lucie TPO Board Meeting is

a regular meeting scheduled for 2:00 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2019.

15. Adjourn

NOTICES The St. Lucie TPO satisfies the requirements of various nondiscrimination laws and regulations including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public participation is welcome without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, income, or family status. Persons wishing to express their concerns about nondiscrimination should contact Marceia Lathou, the Title VI/ADA

Coordinator of the St. Lucie TPO, at 772-462-1593 or via email at [email protected]. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Marceia Lathou at 772-462-1593 at least five days prior to the meeting. Persons who are hearing or speech impaired may use the Florida Relay System by dialing 711.

Items not included on the agenda may also be heard in consideration of the best interests of the

public’s health, safety, welfare, and as necessary to protect every person’s right of access. If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the St. Lucie TPO with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person shall need a record of the proceedings, and for such a purpose, that person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.

Kreyòl Ayisyen: Si ou ta renmen resevwa enfòmasyon sa a nan lang Kreyòl Ayisyen, tanpri rele nimewo 772-462-1593. Español: Si usted desea recibir esta informaciòn en español, por favor llame al 772-462-1593.


Coco Vista Centre 466 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Suite 111


REGULAR BOARD MEETING

DATE: Wednesday, October 3, 2018

TIME: 2:00 pm

LOCATION: St. Lucie TPO

Coco Vista Centre 466 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard, Suite 111

Port St. Lucie, Florida _____________________________________________________________

MEETING SUMMARY

1. Call to Order

Chairwoman Martin called the meeting to order at 2:00 pm.

2. Pledge of Allegiance

Chairwoman Martin led the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. Roll Call

The roll was called and a quorum was noted with 10 members present.

Members Present Representing

Vice Mayor Shannon Martin, Chair City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Linda Bartz, Vice Chair St. Lucie County

Darrell Drummond Community Transit Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky St. Lucie County

Kathryn Hensley St. Lucie Co. School Board Mayor Linda Hudson City of Fort Pierce

Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson St. Lucie County Councilwoman Stephanie Morgan City of Port St. Lucie

Mayor Gregory Oravec City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Cathy Townsend St. Lucie County

October 3, 2018 St. Lucie TPO Regular Board Meeting Page 2 of 9

DRAFT

Others Present Representing

Peter Buchwald St. Lucie TPO Ed DeFini St. Lucie TPO

Yi Ding St. Lucie TPO Marceia Lathou St. Lucie TPO

Rachel Harrison Recording Specialist Jack Andrews City of Fort Pierce

Nick Mimms City of Fort Pierce Rebecca Grohall City of Fort Pierce

Shyanne Helms City of Fort Pierce Roxanne Chesser City of Port St. Lucie

Heath Stocton City of Port St. Lucie Kimberly Graham St. Lucie County

Mayur Patel FDOT John Podczerwinsky FDOT

Mira Skoroden FDOT

Dan Hiden FDOT Chad Huff Florida’s Turnpike

Rax Jung Florida’s Turnpike Enock Mtoi Florida’s Turnpike

Brian Ribaric Florida’s Turnpike Victoria Williams Florida’s Turnpike

Kim Samson Florida’s Turnpike Richard Silvestri TPO CAC

Frank Creyaufmiller Fort Pierce Planning Board Deborah Bowersock Member of Public

Diana Goldberg Port St. Lucie resident Bolivar Gomez Martin MPO

Malcolm Harris-Gowdie Stand Up For Independence Melody Hearn Family Care Council

Richard Pancoast CBC

Rusty Roberts Brightline

4. Comments from the Public – Mr. Harris-Gowdie expressed

dissatisfaction with the length of time he routinely spends waiting for the bus as well as the duration of time spent on the bus. He suggested

that more drivers be hired and that WIFI be made available on bus routes. Commissioner Townsend explained his concerns as ongoing

issues that were being addressed. Mr. Drummond added that issues like these would be identified and addressed as part of the upcoming Transit

Development Plan Major Update.

Ms. Goldberg commented that the new Turnpike interchange should be constructed at Midway Road, as the road was already being widened


DRAFT

and would be able to accommodate additional traffic. She commented

that an interchange at Crosstown Parkway would disrupt the residential character of the area.

5. Comments from Advisory Committee Members (TAC/CAC/BPAC) – Mr. Silvestri informed the Board of his recent positive experience

taking the Brightline passenger rail service to Miami and commented on how impressed he was with the alternative transportation options

available there. He suggested that alternatives like electric shuttles, Uber, and Lyft be explored for the TPO area.

6. Approval of Agenda

* MOTION by Mayor Hudson to approve the agenda.

** SECONDED by Ms. Hensley Carried UNANIMOUSLY

7. Approval of Meeting Summary · August 1, 2018 Regular Board Meeting

* MOTION by Ms. Hensley to approve the Meeting Summary.

** SECONDED by Mayor Hudson Carried UNANIMOUSLY

8. Consent Agenda

8a. 2018 Traffic Count Data Management System (TCDMS)

Scope of Services: Approval of the scope of services to complete

the 2018 traffic counts for the TCDMS.

8b. Executive Director Employment Agreement Amendment: Approval of an Employment Agreement Amendment pertaining to

compensation for the Executive Director.

* MOTION by Ms. Hensley to approve the Consent Agenda.

** SECONDED by Vice Chairwoman Bartz Carried UNANIMOUSLY


DRAFT

9. Action Items

9a. City of Fort Pierce Proposed Station Location: A presentation

by the City of Fort Piece on the proposed location for a future Brightline passenger rail station.

Mr. Buchwald explained that Brightline had launched its regular

passenger rail service from West Palm Beach to Fort Lauderdale in January 2018 and had extended service to Miami in May. With plans to

extend service to Orlando beginning in 2021, Mr. Buchwald continued, Brightline was seeking proposals for viable, community-supported

station locations on the Treasure Coast.

Mr. Buchwald introduced Brightline VP of Government Affairs Rusty Roberts, who highlighted some milestones in Brightline’s development

thus far and shared plans to replicate the service in other parts of the

country. Mr. Roberts outlined several economic benefits of Brightline, gave a photo tour of existing Brightline stations, and concluded with a

Brightline promotional video.

Fort Pierce City Manager Mimms continued the presentation by surveying the history of rail in Fort Pierce. He explained that Fort Pierce

would be an ideal candidate for a Brightline station because of its location, land, and lifestyle: Fort Pierce is strategically located between

Miami and Orlando with several suitable parcels of land able to be developed into a station, and it has a robust tourism industry.

Mr. Mimms also noted that 85 percent of online survey respondents indicated they were in favor of constructing a Brightline station in Fort

Pierce.

Mayor Hudson notified the members that Natalie’s Orchid Island Juice

Company was planning to relocate from its current headquarters in downtown Fort Pierce, which could open up another potential parcel of

land for the Brightline station.

Mayor Oravec asked that residents who initially opposed Brightline consider the benefits of having a station in St. Lucie County with the

project already in motion.

* MOTION by Mayor Hudson to endorse a proposed Fort Pierce location for a future Brightline passenger rail station.

** SECONDED by Commissioner Hutchinson Carried UNANIMOUSLY


DRAFT

9b. Florida’s Turnpike Project Development and Environment

(PD&E) Study: A project update by the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) for the PD&E Study being conducted from Jupiter

to Fort Pierce.

Mr. Buchwald explained that the FTE had been completing a PD&E Study for the widening of the Turnpike segment from Indiantown Road in

Jupiter to State Route 70 in Fort Pierce. He indicated that the project would potentially include the reconfiguration of existing interchanges

and the construction of new interchanges, and that the TPO had been involved in the process to ensure that eventual improvements were

consistent with both the TPO’s programs and the Board’s vision.

Mr. Buchwald introduced Mr. Ribaric, who outlined the general goals of the study before listing particular improvements proposed for the

segment. He described several challenges associated with the project,

notified the Board of the status of the PD&E process, and then transitioned to a detailed discussion of the alternatives for both the

existing and potential interchanges within the Turnpike segment. He concluded with an overview of the PD&E Study schedule.

Councilwoman Morgan remarked that Mr. Ribaric had presented several

more alternatives than had been included within the agenda packet and requested that the information be provided regarding those alternatives.

She also echoed the earlier comments of Ms. Goldberg on the suitability of Midway Road as the site of a new interchange given the widening

project that will be undertaken on that segment.

Commissioner Dzadovsky requested that future plans for an airport connector project be taken into account as FTE considers alternatives

for State Route 70 and northward. He also expressed support for Midway

Road as the site of a new interchange to help alleviate the congestion on St. Lucie West Boulevard caused by First Data Field traffic and to

assist first responders in their emergency efforts.

In response to Commissioner Hutchinson’s inquiry regarding neighborhood concerns, Mr. Ribaric affirmed that his team would be

conducting a Public Alternatives Meeting so that residents affected by the project could provide input on the proposed concepts and on noise

abatement strategies. He further clarified that there would be two meetings held on different days, one in Port St. Lucie and one in the

northern part of the County. Commissioner Hutchinson also asked whether FTE had been coordinating with the relevant agencies so that

the Turnpike alternatives could accommodate the plans for Midway Road improvements, and Mr. Ribaric replied in the affirmative.


DRAFT

In response to Councilwoman Morgan’s question, Mr. Ribaric clarified

the timeline for the completion of the PD&E Study.

Commissioner Townsend noted that, in addition to the future airport connector project, the proposed Brightline station should be taken into

account when considering the potential interchange. Mr. Jung replied that there would be many perspectives to consider and reminded the

Board of the process required to document the need for the interchanges.

Chairwoman Martin commented on the need for the PD&E Study to

accommodate the City’s Parks Master Plan.

In response to Mr. Buchwald’s request for clarification, Mr. Ribaric explained that his team would narrow down the list of alternatives

before the Public Alternatives meeting and then, based on public input

received at the meeting, provide a preferred list of alternatives for review and endorsement by the TPO Board.

Commissioner Hutchinson requested that the State provide an update

on the Midway Road project extending from Selvitz Road to Glades Cut Off Road, and Mr. Buchwald replied that he would arrange it for the

December Board meeting.

9c. 2018/19 List of Priority Projects (LOPP) Amendments: Review and consideration of proposed amendments to the

Transportation Alternatives (TA) Projects List of the 2018/19 LOPP of the St. Lucie TPO.

Mr. Buchwald explained that the TPO Advisory Committees had

recommended at their July meetings that the draft 2018/19 LOPP be

adopted, with the Technical Advisory Committee further recommending the removal of recently completed sidewalk projects from the TA

Projects list along with the addition of several new projects originating from the City of Port St. Lucie as unranked and unscored projects.

Mr. Buchwald further explained that St. Lucie County staff had submitted a list of proposed projects for the TA Projects List after the

July meetings, but that the TPO Board had voted at its August meeting to approve the draft LOPP without the addition of the County projects

so that they may undergo the usual process of review and approval. Both the City of Port St. Lucie projects and the County projects had since

been scored, Mr. Buchwald indicated, and the TA Projects List reprioritized accordingly. He noted that all of the projects on the TA List

originated from the St. Lucie Walk-Bike Network and that the TPO


DRAFT

Advisory Committees had recommended the proposed amendments for

adoption at their September meetings.

In response to Commissioner Dzadovsky’s question, Mr. Buchwald explained that sidewalks on the LOPP initially come from the Long Range

Transportation Plan Cost Feasible Plan and that the LOPP provides flexibility to allow local agencies to add projects to it over time.

Mr. Buchwald further clarified that sidewalk funding does not negatively impact funding for roads and bridges because the former comes from

the Transportation Alternatives program.

Councilwoman Morgan questioned the need for LOPP sidewalk projects located in rural areas, and discussion ensued regarding the importance

of recognizing such projects on the LOPP, regardless of location or rank, for the purpose of long-range planning.

* MOTION by Commissioner Hutchinson to adopt the proposed amendments to the 2018/19 LOPP.

** SECONDED by Ms. Hensley Carried UNANIMOUSLY

9d. Pavement, Bridge, and System Performance Targets:

Review and consideration of Pavement, Bridge, and System Performance Targets for adoption by the St. Lucie TPO.

Mr. Buchwald explained that recent legislation aimed at ensuring

efficient investment of Federal transportation funds had established three Performance Measure (PM) rules to monitor Safety, Bridge and

Pavement, and System Performance. Mr. Ding continued the presentation by indicating that state DOTs are required to establish

statewide targets, and that MPOs can either support these targets or

adopt their own targets. He noted that the TPO Board had voted to support the FDOT 2018 Safety targets in December 2017 and that the

TPO had until November 2018 to adopt the Bridge and Pavement and System Performance targets. Mr. Ding reported that staff had analyzed

the TPO’s Bridge and Pavement and System Performance data and found that its performance significantly exceeded the State average, and it

was therefore appropriate to adopt the same targets as FDOT’s Bridge and Pavement and System Performance initial targets.

In response to Commissioner Dzadovsky’s question regarding the

consequences of not meeting the targets, Mr. Buchwald explained that failure to meet a bridge target, for example, would result in an MPO

having federal funding withheld until it allocated more funding toward


DRAFT

bridges, but that consequences of other target failures were unclear

since the regulations were so new.

* MOTION by Ms. Hensley to adopt the proposed Pavement, Bridge, and System Performance Targets.

** SECONDED by Mayor Hudson Carried UNANIMOUSLY

10. Discussion Items

10a. Local Incentive Program for Project Advancement (LIPPA): An update on the development of the proposed LIPPA.

Mr. Buchwald explained that LIPPA had been proposed in July to the TPO

Advisory Committees as a way to recognize and incentivize the

allocation of local funding to TPO Priority Projects, and that the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) had requested additional opportunity to

review and comment on the program before its consideration for adoption by the TPO Board. Shortly afterward, he continued, the TPO

Executive Committee had reviewed LIPPA as originally presented and recommended more review by the TAC as well as by FDOT. These

recommendations were accepted by the TPO Board at its August meeting. Mr. Buchwald noted that a LIPPA workshop had been held at

the end of August and that the TAC and FDOT representatives had identified a number of benefits and challenges which Mr. Buchwald then

enumerated for the Board. He then identified that an initial summary of funding allocations from the TPO’s Transportation Improvement

Programs over the past 10 years had been prepared and was provided to the Board at the meeting. He requested that the Board consider the

funding summary to be a work in progress as more time is needed to

refine and evaluate it. He then requested further direction from the Board with regard to the development of the LIPPA

Chairwoman Martin requested that the agenda item be postponed to the

December Board meeting so that staff may present examples of jurisdictions with similar programs, and consensus was obtained by the

Board to postpone further discussion on the item to the December Board meeting.

11. FDOT Comments – None

12. Recommendations/Comments by Members – None.


DRAFT

13. TPO Staff Comments – Mr. Buchwald announced that he would be

attending several meetings in the following weeks including the MPO-FDOT Leadership Meeting in Tallahassee, Florida. He also

commented on the importance of the December Board meeting at which FDOT staff would present the Draft Tentative Work Program.

14. Next Meeting: The next St. Lucie TPO Board Meeting is a regular meeting scheduled for 2:00 pm on Wednesday, December 5, 2018.

15. Adjourn – The meeting was adjourned at 3:35 pm.

Respectfully submitted: Approved by:

___________________ ______________________ Rachel Harrison Vice Mayor Shannon Martin

Recording Specialist Chairwoman




AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

Board/Committee: St. Lucie TPO Board

Meeting Date: December 5, 2018

Item Number: 8a

Item Title: 2019 Meeting Dates

Item Origination: Annual administrative business

UPWP Reference: Task 1.1 – Program Management

Requested Action: Approve or disapprove

Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the proposed

2019 meeting dates be approved.

Attachments

· Proposed 2019 Meeting Dates




St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization Board PROPOSED

2019 Meeting Dates (Approved: ______________)

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

Wednesday, October 2, 2019

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

All meetings start at 2:00 pm

NOTICES The St. Lucie TPO satisfies the requirements of various nondiscrimination laws and regulations including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public participation is welcome without regard to race, color,

national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, income, or family status. Persons wishing to express their concerns about nondiscrimination should contact Marceia Lathou, the Title VI/ADA Coordinator of the St. Lucie TPO, at 772-462-1593 or via email at [email protected]. Persons who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Marceia Lathou at 772-462-1593 at

least five days prior to the meeting. Persons who are hearing or speech impaired may use the Florida Relay System by dialing 711. Items not included on the agenda may also be heard in consideration of the best interests of the public’s health, safety, welfare, and as necessary to protect every person’s right of access. If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the St. Lucie TPO with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, that person shall need a record of the proceedings, and for such a purpose, that person may need to

ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Kreyòl Ayisyen: Si ou ta renmen resevwa enfòmasyon sa a nan lang Kreyòl Ayisyen, tanpri rele nimewo

772-462-1593. Español: Si usted desea recibir esta informaciòn en español, por favor llame al 772-462-1593.




AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY



Item Number: 9a

Item Title: Annual Officer Elections and Appointments

Item Origination: St. Lucie TPO By-Laws, Rules, and Procedures

UPWP Reference: Task 1.1 - Program Management

Requested Action: Elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson and confirm or approve the following appointments:

· TPO Executive Committee

· Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Advisory Council (MPOAC)

· Treasure Coast Transportation Council

(TCTC)

· St. Lucie Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged (LCB)

Chairperson

Staff Recommendation: Not applicable

Attachments

· 2019 Board Member Roster

· 2018 Board Members and Appointments




2019

Board Member Roster

Voting Member Representing

Mayor Linda Hudson City of Fort Pierce

Commissioner Reginald Sessions City of Fort Pierce Councilwoman Jolien Caraballo City of Port St. Lucie

Vice Mayor Shannon Martin City of Port St. Lucie

Councilwoman Stephanie Morgan City of Port St. Lucie

Mayor Gregory Oravec City of Port St. Lucie

Commissioner Linda Bartz St. Lucie County Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky St. Lucie County

Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson St. Lucie County

Commissioner Cathy Townsend St. Lucie County

Kathryn Hensley St. Lucie County School Board

Darrell Drummond Transit

Board Alternates Representing

Commissioner Jeremiah Johnson City of Fort Pierce

Councilman John Carvelli City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Sean Mitchell St. Lucie County

Padrick Pinkney Transit

Non-Voting Advisor

Florida Department of Transportation


2018

BOARD MEMBERS AND APPOINTMENTS (Committee/Council Appointments are Italicized)

Voting Members Representing Vice Mayor Shannon Martin, Chairwoman City of Port St. Lucie Executive Committee, MPOAC Member Commissioner Linda Bartz, Vice Chairwoman St. Lucie County

Executive Committee, MPOAC 1st Alternate Mayor Linda Hudson City of Fort Pierce Executive Committee Commissioner Reginald Sessions City of Fort Pierce

Councilwoman Jolien Caraballo City of Port St. Lucie Mayor Gregory Oravec City of Port St. Lucie Councilwoman Stephanie Morgan City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky St. Lucie County

TCTC Alternate Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson St. Lucie County Commissioner Cathy Townsend St. Lucie County LCB Chairwoman, MPOAC 2nd Alternate

Kathryn Hensley St. Lucie County School Board Executive Committee, TCTC Member Darrell Drummond Transit Executive Committee, TCTC Member

Alternates Representing

Commissioner Jeremiah Johnson City of Fort Pierce Councilman John Carvelli City of Port St. Lucie Commissioner Anthony Bonna St. Lucie County

Padrick Pinkney Transit

Non-Voting Advisor Florida Department of Transportation

Acronyms MPOAC: Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council

TCTC: Treasure Coast Transportation Council LCB: St. Lucie Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged






AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY



Item Number: 9b

Item Title: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 Draft Tentative Work

Program (DTWP)

Item Origination: FDOT

UPWP Reference: Task 3.3 – Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Requested Action: Endorse the FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24 DTWP,

endorse with conditions, or do not endorse.

Staff Recommendation: Based on the recommendation of the

TPO Advisory Committees and that the DTWP appears to be consistent with the TIP, the

2018/19 List of Priority Projects, applicable grant cycles, and the Go2040 Long Range

Transportation Plan, it is recommended that the DTWP for FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 be endorsed.

Attachments · Staff Report

· 2018/19 List of Priority Projects · FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 DTWP Citizen’s Report

· Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 DTWP Summary of

Projects




MEMORANDUM

TO: St. Lucie TPO Board

FROM: Peter Buchwald

Executive Director

DATE: November 28, 2018

SUBJECT: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 Draft Tentative Work

Program (DTWP)

BACKGROUND

The DTWP identifies the State and Federally-funded transportation projects and project phases that will be implemented during the five-year period of

FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24. The DTWP is developed annually, and FDOT

District 4 used the attached 2018/19 List of Priority Projects (LOPP), that was reviewed and initially adopted by the TPO Board on August 1st, to

develop this DTWP.

Should the DTWP be endorsed by the TPO Board, the Final Tentative Work Program (FTWP) will be submitted to the Governor and the State Legislature

for adoption during the 2019 Legislative Session. Upon its adoption, the FTWP will be provided to the TPO for development of the TPO’s

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24 which will be reviewed by the TPO Board in June 2019.

In developing the DTWP, FDOT first attempts to protect the projects in the

existing Adopted Work Program. FDOT then allocates funding to the projects in the TPO’s LOPP to the extent that the funding is available. Existing

projects may be advanced or new projects and project phases typically are

allocated to the new fifth year of the DTWP.

FDOT District 4 is presenting the DTWP, which is summarized in the attached DTWP Citizen’s Report, for review and endorsement by the Board. The

presentation will address the extent to which projects from the TPO’s LOPP

November 28, 2018 Page 2 of 4

will be funded (also known as programmed). In addition, the FY 2019/20 –

FY 2023/24 DTWP of the Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) will be presented which highlights the FTE projects in the TPO area.

ANALYSIS

In reviewing the DTWP, it should be compared to the TPO’s FY 2018/19 – FY 2022/23 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) with regard to the

programmed projects from the TPO’s LOPP to identify any significant changes in the programming of these projects. The DTWP also should be

compared with the TIP with regard to previously-programmed projects under the various transit grant programs and other grant programs such as the

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP), and the County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP).

In addition, the DTWP should be reviewed to confirm that any new projects that were prioritized in the TPO’s LOPP and during the 2018 grant cycles for

the TAP, TRIP, and CIGP are now included. Finally, the DTWP should be reviewed for consistency with the Go2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

(LRTP).

In general, review of the DTWP indicates that all of the TPO’s Priority Projects in the Master List of the LOPP received funding and are advancing.

The review of the DTWP further indicates the following significant project changes or additions as compared to the TIP:

· The replacement of the SR-A1A North Bridge was postponed one year

to FY 2021/22 due to complications with the acquisition of right-of-way;

· The widening of Port St. Lucie Boulevard from Paar Drive to Darwin Boulevard was split into two segments at Alcantarra Boulevard with

the segment from Darwin Boulevard to Alcantarra Boulevard programmed for construction in FY 2023-24;

· The construction of safety improvements which include the installation

of new lighting at the intersection of Okeechobee Road and Midway Road are programmed for the next fiscal year;

· The widening of Midway Road from Glades Cut Off Road to Selvitz

Road was split into two segments at Jenkins Road/Milner Drive with right-of-way acquisition continuing into the next two fiscal years;


· The right-of-way acquisition for the widening of Kings Highway from

St Lucie Boulevard to Indrio Road is programmed for the next fiscal year;

· The construction of the Curtis Street Sidewalk from Prima Vista

Boulevard to Floresta Drive and the Alcantarra Boulevard Sidewalk from Savona Boulevard to Port St. Lucie Boulevard are programmed

for construction in FY 2021/22 with the TPO’s TAP funding from the 2018 grant cycle;

· The construction of two projects from the TPO’s recently-adopted

Congestion Management Process (CMP) are programmed which consist of intersection improvements at Prima Vista Boulevard and Airoso

Boulevard in FY 2022/23 and the installation of adaptive traffic signal control technology along Gatlin Boulevard from I-95 to Port St. Lucie

Boulevard in FY 2023/24;

· The Fare Free Transit Pilot funding for St. Lucie County continues into

the next fiscal year along with funding for Route 1 improvements, and the Lakewood Park Regional Bus Route funding continues through

FY 2020/21;

· The construction of the East Coast Greenway (ECG)/Florida Shared Use Network (SUN) Trail through the Savannas Preserve State Park

was split into two segments at Lennard Road with the segment from Walton Road to Lennard Road programmed for construction in

FY 2020/21 and the segment of Lennard Road to the Savannas Recreation Area programmed for construction in FY 2022/23;

· Over $5.2 million of improvement projects at the Treasure Coast

International Airport are programmed for the next fiscal year; and,

· The Port of Fort Pierce Master Plan Update and the rehabilitation of the

South Dock at the Port of Fort Pierce are programmed for the next fiscal year.

Review of the FTE DTWP indicates a single project in the TPO area which is

the implementation of All-Electronic Tolling (AET) that is programmed to start next fiscal year.

Based on the review, the DTWP appears to be consistent with the TIP, the

2018/19 LOPP, applicable grant cycles, and the Go2040 LRTP.


At the Joint Meeting on November 27th, the TPO Advisory Committees

reviewed the DTWP and recommended it for adoption.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the recommendation of the TPO Advisory Committees and that the

DTWP appears to be consistent with the TIP, the 2018/19 LOPP, applicable grant cycles, and the Go2040 LRTP, it is recommended that the DTWP for

FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 be endorsed.


Coco Vista Centre 466 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard, Suite 111


2018/19 List of Priority Projects (LOPP) (Adopted August 1, 2018; Amended October 3, 2018)

Master List

2018/19 Priority Ranking

Major Gateway

Corridor?1 Facility

Project Limits

Project Description Project Status/Notes In LRTP2

Cost Feasible Plan?

Estimated Cost 2017/18 Priority Ranking From To

1 N/A3 St. Lucie TPO Planning/administration as detailed in the Unified Planning Work Program

Allocated by TPO Board for FY 2018/19 and FY 2019/20

N/A $300,000 1

2 Yes Port St. Lucie Boulevard

Paar Drive Darwin Boulevard

Add 2 lanes, sidewalks, bicycle lanes

PE4 and ROW5 in process

Yes $19,200,0006 2

3 Yes Midway Road Glades Cut Off Road

Selvitz Road


PE in process, ROW to start in FY 2018/19

Yes $38,700,00066 3

4 Yes Port St. Lucie Boulevard

Becker Road

Paar Drive Add 2 lanes, sidewalks, bicycle lanes

PE to start in FY 2020/21, ROW to start in FY 2022/23

Yes $16,800,0006 4

5 Yes U.S. Highway 1 at Ohio Avenue

Intersection Improvements

Install Traffic Signal Mast Arms

Yes (US-1 Corridor

Retrofit) $505,9017 NR8

6 Yes Kings Highway St. Lucie Boulevard

Indrio Road


PE to start in FY 2019/20

Yes $57,700,0009 7

710 Yes Northern/Airport Connector

Florida’s Turnpike

Kings Highway

New multimodal corridor with interchanges at Florida’s Turnpike and I-95

Feasibility Study to start in FY 2018/19

Yes (Northern Connector)

$122,580,00011 8

1Landscape funding eligibility for capacity projects based on 2012 FDOT Landscape Policy 2LRTP: Go2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, February 2016 3N/A: Not Applicable 4PE: Preliminary Engineering 5ROW: Right-of-Way Acquisition 6Source of Estimated Cost: Florida Department of Transportation District 4, July 2018 7Source of Estimated Cost: City of Fort Pierce, July 2018 8NR: Not Ranked in this List. However, the Project was the #3-Ranked Project in the CMP List of the 2017/18 LOPP. 9Source of Estimated Cost: St. Lucie TPO Transportation Improvement Program FY 2018/19 - FY 2022/23 10Any funding allocated to this project shall not reduce the funding to be allocated to higher-ranked projects that are not on the State Highway System 11Source of Estimated Cost: Go2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, February 2016

2018/19 LOPP Adopted August 1, 2018; Amended October 3, 2018 Page 2 of 7

Congestion Management Process (CMP) List

(The St. Lucie TPO’s allocation of Surface Transportation Block Grant funds to CMP projects is $300,000 - $400,000 annually)

1Source of Estimated Cost: CMP Plan, unless otherwise noted 2CMP Plan: St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization Congestion Management Process Major Update, June 2018 3NR: Not Ranked, typically because this is the first year that the project is in the list


Facility/Intersection Project Description Project

Status/Notes Estimated

Cost1 CMP Plan2 Ranking


1 Easy Street from U.S. Highway 1 to Yucca Drive

Reconstruct east leg of intersection at U.S. Highway 1 to consist of three lanes westbound, two lanes eastbound, sidewalks, and wide, paved shoulders for bike lanes

$300,000 1 NR3

2 Prima Vista Boulevard at Floresta Drive

Install fiber optic cable and traffic cameras at the signalized intersection and incorporate signal timing adjustments

$50,000 2 NR

3 Prima Vista Boulevard at Airoso Boulevard

Add raised medians at intersection approaches, emergency signal at SW Ravenswood Lane, and mid-block crosswalk

$250,000 3 NR

4 Gatlin Boulevard from West of I-95 to Port St. Lucie Boulevard

Install traffic cameras at signalized intersections, optimize green time, and add adaptive traffic signal control, if needed

$280,000 7 NR

4 Port St. Lucie Boulevard from Tulip Boulevard to Gatlin Boulevard

Install fiber optic cable along Port St. Lucie Boulevard and traffic cameras at signalized intersections

$275,000 7 NR

6 Cashmere Boulevard from St. Lucie West Boulevard to Peacock Boulevard

Extend the existing 4-lane, divided section to north of the intersection at Swan Lake Circle and evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the main entrance at the West Gate K-8 School

$335,000 9 NR


Transit


Facility/Equipment/Service Project Location/Description Is Funding for Capital and/or

Operating?

In LRTP1 or TDP2?

Estimated Cost3 2017/18 Priority Ranking

1 Vehicle Purchases New/replacement buses as specified in the Transit Asset Management Plan

Capital Yes $425,0004 2

2 Bus Route Infrastructure Miscellaneous locations along the fixed routes with priority at transfer locations

Capital Yes $75,000

(total for bus shelters) 3

3 Expanded Local Services Route 1 – Improve frequency to 30 minutes Operating Yes $380,000 5

4 New Bus Services New bus service along 25th Street via intermodal facility

Capital & Operating

Yes $800,000 4

5 Jobs Express Commuter Service Regional bus service to West Palm Beach Operating Yes $400,0005 NR6

6 Treasure Coast Transit Center Centralized facility for bus maintenance with park-and-ride component

Capital Yes $8,300,000 1

7 Micro-Transit (Pilot Project) On-demand flex service to augment the fixed route, address first and last mile connections, and redesign existing Route 6 for improved efficiency

Operating Yes $300,000 NR

8 Community Bike Share Sustain and expand multimodal options Capital & Operating

Yes $200,000 NR

1LRTP: Go2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, February 2016 2TDP: St. Lucie County FY 2015-FY 2024 Transit Development Plan Major Update, June 2014 3Source of Estimated Cost: St. Lucie County Transit Staff, July 2018, unless otherwise noted 4Source of Estimated Cost: Transit Asset Management Plan, Community Transit 5Source of Estimated Cost: Community Transit Memorandum, October 2011 6Not Ranked, typically because this is the first year that the project is in the list


Transportation Alternatives (TA) Projects


Score1 Facility Project Limits Project

Description Project Source

Estimated

Cost2

2017/18 Priority Ranking From To

1 42.0 Curtis Street Prima Vista Boulevard Marion Avenue Sidewalk-0.3 miles 2018 TA Grant Application3 and St. Lucie WBN4

$573,5685 16

2 38.5 Alcantarra Boulevard Port St. Lucie

Boulevard Savona Boulevard Sidewalk-0.8 miles

2018 TA Grant Application3 and St. Lucie WBN

$606,4025 14

3 58.0 East Torino Parkway Volucia Drive Conus Street Sidewalk-0.4 miles St. Lucie WBN $220,080 9

4 52.5 St. James Drive Royce Avenue Lazy River Parkway Sidewalk-0.3 miles 2017 TA Grant Application and St. Lucie WBN

$260,0006 6

5 50.0 Florida SUN Trail, Historic Fort Pierce Downtown Retrofit

Georgia Avenue North State Route A1A

Bicycle Boulevard, Roadway Section Connections, and Railroad Crossing Improvements

Florida SUN Trail Grant and St. Lucie WBN

TBD7 3

6 49.0 Floresta Drive Port St. Lucie Boulevard

Southbend Boulevard Sidewalk-0.6 miles St. Lucie WBN $489,8216 6

6 49.0 Floresta Drive Port St. Lucie Boulevard

Streamlet Avenue Sidewalk-1.0 mile St. Lucie WBN $850,8988 11

8 48.5 Walton Road Lennard Road Green River Parkway Sidewalk-1.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $3,040,0009 5

9 46.0 Rosser Boulevard Openview Bamberg Street Sidewalk-2.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $708,8898 27

9 46.0 East Torino Parkway Vizcaya Falls Midway Road Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $851,0008 NR10

9 46.0 Torino Parkway Cashmere Boulevard California Boulevard Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $645,0008 NR

12 44.0 Florida SUN Trail, Historic Highwayman Trail Gap

Indian Hills Drive Georgia Avenue Multi-Use Trail and Roadway Section

Connections

Florida SUN Trail Grant and

St. Lucie WBN

TBD 4

12 44.0 Paar Drive Bamberg Street Savona Boulevard Sidewalk-0.9 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,136,4958 26

14 43.5 Selvitz Road Milner Drive Peachtree Boulevard Sidewalk-0.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $582,0008 10

14 43.5 Orange Avenue Rock Road North Kings Highway Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $500,0006 NR

16 42.5 Selvitz Road Floresta Drive Bayshore Boulevard Sidewalk-0.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,077,9278 30

16 42.5 Oleander Avenue Edwards Road South Market Avenue Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,500,0006 NR

16 42.5 Oleander Avenue Saeger Avenue Beach Avenue Sidewalk-1.4 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,650,0006 NR

19 42.0 Lakehurst Drive Bayshore Boulevard Airoso Boulevard Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $825,0008 NR





Estimated

Cost2


19 42.0 Sandia Drive Crosstown Parkway Thornhill Drive Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $323,0008 NR

19 42.0 Sandia Drive Lakehurst Drive Crosstown Parkway Sidewalk-0.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $516,0008 NR

19 42.0 North Kings Highway North of I-95 State Project

Indrio Road Sidewalk-5.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $5,219,9826 NR

23 41.5 Morningside Boulevard Treasure Island Road Cambridge Street Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $342,0008 NR

23 41.5 Indrio Road U.S. Highway 1 Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk-0.2 miles St. Lucie WBN $225,0006 NR

25 41.0 Savage Boulevard Import Drive Gatlin Boulevard Sidewalk-1.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,448,3838 20

25 41.0 Import Drive Gatlin Boulevard Savage Boulevard Sidewalk-2.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,405,7818 20

25 41.0 West Torino Parkway Blanton Road California Boulevard Sidewalk-1.6 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,710,0008 NR

25 41.0 Blanton Boulevard East Torino Parkway West Torino Parkway Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $690,0008 NR

29 40.5 Volucia Drive Blanton Boulevard Torino Parkway Sidewalk-1.0 mile St. Lucie WBN $645,0008 23

29 40.5 Indrio Road Kings Highway U.S. Highway 1 Sidewalk-2.6 miles St. Lucie WBN $3,050,7906 NR

31 40.0 Oleander Avenue Midway Road Saeger Avenue Sidewalk-1.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,323,840 23

32 39.5 Southbend Boulevard Oakridge Drive Eagle Drive Sidewalk-0.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,709,2158 11

33 39.0 Hillmoor Drive Hospital Woodstork Trail Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $348,0008 NR

33 39.0 Hillmoor Drive Lennard Road Playground Sidewalk-0.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $71,0008 NR

35 38.0 Emil Avenue Oleander Avenue U.S. Highway 1 Sidewalk-1.7 miles St. Lucie WBN $347,487 31

36 37.0 Florida SUN Trail, Savannas Preserve State Park Gap

Walton Road Savannas Recreation Area

Multi-Use Trail Florida SUN Trail Grant and St. Lucie WBN

$6,820,00011 2

37 36.5 Angle Road Kings Highway North 53rd Street Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,461,5956 NR

38 36.0 17th Street Sidewalk Gaps Georgia Avenue Avenue Q Sidewalk-1.7 miles St. Lucie WBN $222,700 6

38 36.0 Boston Avenue 25th Street 13th Street Sidewalk-0.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $123,200 16

38 36.0 North Torino Parkway East Torino Parkway Blanton Road Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $652,0008 NR

41 35.0 Florida SUN Trail, Florida East Coast Railroad Overpass

Savannas Recreation Area

Savannah Road Railroad Overpass for Multi-Use Trail

Florida SUN Trail Grant and St. Lucie WBN

$2,210,00012 15

41 35.0 29th Street Sidewalk Gaps Avenue I Avenue Q Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $77,000 16





Estimated

Cost2


41 35.0 29th Street Avenue Q Avenue T Sidewalk-0.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $197,000 25

41 35.0 Abingdon Avenue Import Drive Savona Boulevard Sidewalk-0.9 miles St. Lucie WBN $575,0008 NR

41 35.0 Brescia Street Savage Boulevard Gatlin Boulevard Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $323,0008 NR

41 35.0 Cadima Street Fairgreen Road Galiano Road Sidewalk-0.2 miles St. Lucie WBN $96,0008 NR

41 35.0 Fairgreen Road Cadima Street Crosstown Parkway Sidewalk-0.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $523,0008 NR

41 35.0 Galiano Road Cadima Street Import Drive Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $290,0008 NR

41 35.0 Kestor Drive Darwin Boulevard Becker Road Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $865,0008 NR

41 35.0 Volucia Drive Blanton Boulevard East Torino Parkway Sidewalk-1.3 miles St. Lucie WBN $645,0008 NR

51 33.5 Tiffany Avenue Grand Drive Green River Parkway Sidewalk-1.0 mile St. Lucie WBN $670,4608 13

51 33.5 Weatherbee Road U.S. Highway 1 Oleander Avenue Sidewalk-0.5 miles St. Lucie WBN $445,220 22

53 32.0 Range Line Road Glades Cut Off Road Martin County Line Sidewalk-6.1 miles St. Lucie WBN $5,300,0006 NR

53 32.0 West Midway Road West of Glades Cut Off Road

Shinn Road Area Sidewalk-5.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $5,753,5806 NR

55 31.5 St. Lucie Boulevard Kings Highway North 25th Street Sidewalk-3.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,600,0006 NR

56 30.5 Sunrise Boulevard Edwards Road Midway Road Sidewalk-2.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,250,0006 NR

57 29.5 Bell Avenue Oleander Avenue 25th Street Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $600,0006 NR

57 29.5 Fort Pierce Boulevard Indrio Road Sebastian Road Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $870,0006 NR

59 27.0 Old Dixie Highway St. Lucie Boulevard Turnpike Feeder Road Sidewalk-5.2 miles St. Lucie WBN $6,066,7806 NR

60 26.5 Glades Cut Off Road Port St. Lucie City Boundary

Range Line Road Sidewalk-2.4 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,830,3906 NR

60 26.5 Keen Road Angle Road St. Lucie Boulevard Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,160,0006 NR

62 25.5 Easy Street US Highway 1 Silver Oak Drive Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,090,3966 NR

62 25.5 Selvitz Road Edwards Road Midway Road Sidewalk-2.4 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,760,7906 NR

64 24.5 Juanita Avenue Bridge U.S. Highway 1 Sidewalk-0.2 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,041,5926 NR

64 24.5 Juanita Avenue North 53rd Street North 25th Street Sidewalk-1.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,041,5926 NR





Estimated

Cost2


66 15.5 Silver Oak Drive Easy Street East Midway Road Sidewalk-1.8 miles St. Lucie WBN $2,076,3926 NR

67 15.0 Taylor Dairy Road Angle Road St. Lucie Boulevard Sidewalk-1.0 miles St. Lucie WBN $1,160,0006 NR

1Scores are based on the St. Lucie TPO TA Project Prioritization Methodology 2Source of Estimated Cost: Go2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, February 2016, unless otherwise noted 3Project is anticipated to be programmed for construction in the FDOT FY 2019/20 - FY 2023/24 Work Program as a result of the 2018 TA Grant Cycle 4WBN: Walk-Bike Network 5Source of Estimated Cost: 2018 TA Grant Application 6Source of Estimated Cost: St. Lucie County Citing FDOT Cost Per Mile @ $226,656 7TBD: To be Determined 8Source of Estimated Cost: City of Port St. Lucie Sidewalk Master Plan (Design and Construction) July 2017 9Source of Estimated Cost: Walton Road Multimodal Improvements Feasibility Study, April 2017 10NR: Not Ranked, typically because this is the first year that the project is in the list 11Source of Estimated Cost: Feasibility Study, SUN Trail Savannas Preserve State Park Gap, June 2018 12Source of Estimated Cost: Feasibility Study for SUN Trail Florida East Coast Railroad Overpass, June 2018

Citizen's ReportDraft Tentative Work Program

Fiscal Year 2020 - 2024

St. Lucie County

Prepared by FDOT - District 4 Program Management Office - 11/14/2018 Data

County: St. Lucie ( 94 )

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 01 INTRASTATE INTERSTATE

PD&E/EMO STUDY Work Mix:

422681.6 I-95 FROM MARTIN/ST. LUCIE COUNTY LINE TO SR-70

Extra Description:

PM: Raul Dominguez

Cont. Class: TALLAHASSEE LET

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedPDE ACNP $550,000 $550,000 $2,110,000

Construction ACNP $115,743,218

Total For Project 422681.6 $550,000 $550,000 $2,110,000 $115,743,218

INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES Work Mix:

435337.1 SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD

Extra Description: 2017 TPO PRIORITY #5 FROM COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO PEACOCK BLVD., WIDENING OF ROADWAY TO ACCOMMODATE THREE EB LANES AND TWO WB LANES ACROSS THE BRIDGE OVER I-95 AND BUILD A NEW EB BRIDGE. 3201=PRE-DESIGN SERVICES; 3202=DESIGN CONSULTANT CONTRACT 3210=GEO-TECH WIDENING THE SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP INTERSECTION TO PROVIDE DESCRIPTION CONT.... NB OFF RAMP TO PROVIDE 2 LEFT TURN LANES AND 3 RIGHT TURN MODIFYING THE NB AND SB ON ENTRANCE RAMPS TO TWO LANES. LFA W/CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE= 3.1M TWO LEFT TURN LANES AND ONE RIGHT TURN LANE. WIDENING THE...

PM: Scott Thurman


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction DDR $400,000 $8,139,569 $8,539,569

LF $3,100,000 $3,100,000TRIP $2,113,636 $2,113,636TRWR $565,884 $565,884

Incentive DDR $150,000 $150,000

CEI DDR $2,013,534 $2,013,534DIH $108,786 $108,786

ENV DDR $30,000 $30,000


November. 14 2018 Page 2 of 27St. Lucie County



439754.1 SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD.

Extra Description: MIDWAY RD AT I-95 NB & SB OFF-RAMP INTERSECTION SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENTS; A)ADD SECOND LEFT TURN LANES TO BOTH NB AND SB OFF-RAMPS

PM: Kenzot Jasmin


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. DIH $20,000 $20,000

DS $230,000 $230,000

Construction DS $10,000 $1,277,145 $1,287,145

CEI DIH $57,472 $57,472DS $191,572 $191,572

ENV DS $10,000 $30,000 $40,000



439761.1 SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD.

Extra Description: GATLIN BLVD AT NORTHBOUND & SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMP INTERSECTION SHORT TERM IMPROVEMENTS: A)ADD A THIRD LEFT AND TRIPLE RIGHT TURN LANES ON SB OFF-RAMP WITH MINOR WIDENING TO RECEIVING LANES ON GATLIN BLVD. B) ADD THIRD LEFT TURN LANE AND DUAL RIGHT TURN LANES ON NB OFF-RAMP.

PM: Anson Sonnett

Cont. Class: DISTRICT LET

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction ACFP $20,000 $3,108,580 $3,128,580

CEI ACFP $601,299 $601,299

ENV DDR $20,000 $20,000

Total For Project 439761.1 $40,000 $3,709,879 $3,749,879

LANDSCAPING Work Mix:

441314.1 SR-9/I-95 @ BECKER ROAD INTERCHANGE

Extra Description: STANDALONE INDEPENDENT PROJECT

PM: Raul Dominguez


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction DDR $640,509 $640,509

CEI DDR $121,698 $121,698DIH $51,242 $51,242

Total For Project 441314.1 $813,449 $813,449



SKID HAZARD OVERLAY Work Mix:

443847.1 SR-9/I-95 FROM NORTH OF GATLIN BLVD TO SOUTH OF ST. LUCIE WEST BLVD

Extra Description: ANTICIPATED NPV=$7,258,112; B/C=2.1;1)LENGTHEN ON-RAMP ACCELERATION LANES (NORTHBOUND ON-RAMP FROM GATLIN BLVD.AND SOUTHBOUND ON-RAMP FROM ST. LUCIE W. BLVD.) TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT FDOT DESIGN STANDARDS;2)INSTALL A DYNAMIC MESSAGE (DMS) IN THE NORTHBOUND DIRECTION SOUTH OF GATLIN BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE;3)INSTALL CONVENTIONAL ROADWAY LIGHTING WITH WITH LED LUMINARIES ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE ROADWAY BETWEEN BETWEEN GATLIN BOULEVARD AND CROSSTOWN PARKWAY INTERCHANGES TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL FOR NIGHTTIME CRASHES; 4)CORRECT PAVEMENT CROSS-SLOPES IN THE OUTSIDE LANE TO 3% TO MEET FDOT DESIGN CRITERIA; 5)PROVIDE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AT AREAS (WITHIN SUPERELEVATION TRANSITIONS) THAT ARE RELATIVELY FLAT EVALUATE AND MODIFY SUPERELEVATION TRANSITION AS NEEDED; 6) INSTALL A WET PAVEMENT DETECTION AND WARNING SYSTEM TO ALERT MOTORISTS OF WET ROADWAY SURFACE CONDITIONS; 7)INSTALL HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT (HFST) AT THE HORIZONTAL CURVE IN THE SOUTHBOUND DIRECTION NORTH OF GATLIN BOULEVARD.

PM: John Olson


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. ACSS $1,199,788 $1,199,788

DIH $10,000 $10,000

Construction ACSS $8,886,427 $8,886,427

CEI ACSS $1,377,397 $1,377,397DIH $11,110 $11,110

ENV ACSS $10,000 $10,000 $20,000

Total For Project 443847.1 $1,219,788 $10,000 $10,274,934 $11,504,722

FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 01 Total $300,000 $1,689,788 $22,250,926 $10,274,934 $550,000 $35,065,648 $2,110,000 $115,743,218

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 03 INTRASTATE STATE HIGHWAY

ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT Work Mix:

230256.6 SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD

Extra Description: PE/ENGINEERING UNDER 230256-2 2012 TPO PRIORITY #2 1,550 FT OF PROJECT WILL BE CONCRETE, BALANCE IS FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT PH5202=LFA WITH ST LUCIE COUNTY; $187,669 LF REC'D 3/1/17 PH5601=FPL DISTRIBUTION UTILITY RELOCATION PH5602=ATT UTILITY RELOCATION PH5603=FPUA ELECTRIC (FT.PIERCE UTILITY AUTHORITY) PH5604=FPUA GAS (FT.PIERCE UTILITY AUTHORITY) PH5605=FPUA WATER (FT.PIERCE UTILITY AUTHORITY) EXCESS LF=52.03 A8= EXCEPTION TO AC FUNDS THAT EXCEEDED THE ALLOCATION PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT A PAYBACK PROJECT

PM: Bing Wang


FORT PIERCE City:

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land DDR $1,586,294 $1,586,294

DS $1,235,364 $1,235,364

Total For Project 230256.6 $2,821,658 $2,821,658




230256.8 SR-713/KING'S HWY FR SOUTH OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD

Extra Description: STANDALONE DEPENDENT PROJECT FOR 230256-6

PM: Bing Wang


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. DDR $126,500 $126,500

DIH $10,000 $10,000

Construction DDR $485,189 $485,189

CEI DDR $116,447 $116,447DIH $43,668 $43,668

Total For Project 230256.8 $136,500 $645,304 $781,804

ADD TURN LANE(S) Work Mix:

424143.1 SR-713 @ SR-614

Extra Description: INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT; CIGP/TRIP FOR R/W; 2013 TPO #4 REPROGRAM AS DOT PROJECT TO ACQUIRE R/W**DO NOT FEDERALIZE** DOT AND COUNTY TO SPLIT ROW; COUNTY TO PAY FOR CONSTRUCTION REC CHECK FROM ST.LUCIE CO. FOR $3,817,948 ON 07/09/09 REC CHECK FROM ST.LUCIE CO. FOR $2,709,534 ON 06/13/13 CHECK #09824068 FOR $2,709,534 WAS REC'D ON 06/13/2013 **VERIFY LF EXPENDITURES W/COMPTROLLER PRIOR TO UPDATING** RIGHT-OF-WAY PROJECT MANAGER=JOSH MILLER PH43 SEQ19 LFP TO TRACK FUNDS FROM THE COUNTY PH45 SEQ16 LFP TO TRACK FUNDS FROM THE COUNTY

PM: Bing Wang

Cont. Class: RIGHT OF WAY ONLY

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land LFP $2,464,071 $2,464,071


TRAFFIC SIGNALS Work Mix:

427805.7 CITY OF FT.PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS

Extra Description:

PM: Jacqueline Thomas

Cont. Class: EXTERN MNGD(NOT LAP)

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DDR $178,114 $178,114

DITS $96,679 $96,679





427805.8 ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS

Extra Description:




DITS $83,769 $83,769



427805.9 CITY OF PORT ST.LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINT & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS

Extra Description:




DITS $76,890 $76,890




BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Work Mix:

429936.2 SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045

Extra Description:

PM: Donovan Pessoa


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. DS $750,000 $750,000

RW Support ACBR $769,582 $24,590 $794,172BRP $180,353 $180,353DIH $137,312 $137,312SA $50,000 $50,000

RW Land ACBR $103,000 $8,592,651 $4,167,155 $3,837,532 $16,700,338BNBR $2,105,526 $2,105,526BRP $1,273,952 $59,410 $22,351 $1,355,713

Construction ACBR $700,000 $500,000 $1,200,000BNBR $50,789,021 $50,789,021DDR $20,333,244 $20,333,244

Incentive DDR $630,000 $630,000

CEI BNBR $8,818,936 $8,818,936DIH $497,856 $497,856DS $129,720 $129,720

Total For Project 429936.2 $3,076,887 $9,376,651 $87,501,121 $3,887,532 $630,000 $104,472,191

ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT Work Mix:

435245.1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS

Extra Description: 2015 TPO PRIORITY #4 SR-5/US-1 FROM SAVANA CLUB BLVD. TO SR-713/KINGS HWY SR-70 FROM SR-713/KINGS HWY TO SR-5/US-1

PM: Alexander Estrada

Cont. Class: DESIGN BUILD

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction DDR $2,879,816 $2,879,816

DS $4,561,153 $4,561,153

CEI DDR $1,142,937 $1,142,937DIH $111,465 $111,465

ENV DDR $16,000 $16,000




ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) Work Mix:

436868.1 SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE

Extra Description: 2015 TPO #3 SOUTH BOUND RIGHT TURN LANE

PM: Bing Wang


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land DS $111,372 $111,372

SU $923,029 $923,029


CEI DDR $156,830 $156,830DIH $66,033 $66,033



437975.1 CITY OF FT. PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS

Extra Description:



Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DDR $183,941 $188,961 $194,063 $199,845 $766,810

DITS $99,096 $101,573 $104,315 $107,445 $412,429

Total For Project 437975.1 $283,037 $290,534 $298,378 $307,290 $1,179,239


437976.1 ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS

Extra Description:




DITS $85,863 $88,010 $90,387 $93,099 $357,359

Total For Project 437976.1 $189,418 $194,672 $199,929 $205,927 $789,946




437977.1 CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS

Extra Description:




DITS $78,812 $80,789 $48,720 $50,182 $258,503



438041.1 SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS

Extra Description: STANDALONE DEPENDENT PROJECT FOR 230256-7

PM: Bing Wang



DS $131,525 $131,525


CEI DDR $90,279 $90,279DIH $33,856 $33,856

ENV DS $5,000 $5,000





438379.1 SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR

Extra Description: 2017 TPO PRIORITY #4 WIDENING 2 TO 4 LANES PD&E UNDER 230256-5

PM: Bing Wang

Cont. Class: MISC - NO LETTING

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Support DDR $1,015,378 $1,015,378

DIH $106,090 $106,090 $212,180

RW Land DDR $5,815,766 $64,992 $5,880,758DS $5,962,745 $5,962,745

Construction DDR $17,869,417 $17,869,417DS $9,000,000 $9,000,000

CEI DDR $2,167,650 $2,167,650DIH $396,144 $396,144

ENV DDR $5,000 $60,000 $65,000

Total For Project 438379.1 $12,904,979 $171,082 $60,000 $29,433,211 $42,569,272


438379.2 SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD

Extra Description: 2017 TPO PRIORITY #4 WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES; PD&E UNDER 230256-5

PM: Bing Wang


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Support DDR $1,004,226 $1,004,226

DIH $133,673 $133,673

RW Land DDR $1,288,455 $2,684,559 $3,973,014SU $3,996,709 $656,819 $4,653,528

Construction DDR $8,794,673 $8,794,673DS $17,006,027 $17,006,027

CEI DDR $3,612,097 $3,612,097DIH $387,010 $387,010

ENV DDR $75,000 $75,000

Total For Project 438379.2 $6,498,063 $3,341,378 $29,799,807 $39,639,248




438379.3 SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM ST LUCIE BOULEVARD TO SOUTH OF INDRIO ROAD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #6 WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES; PD&E UNDER 230256-5 R/W REQUIRED

PM: Bing Wang


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. DDR $2,000,000 $2,000,000

DIH $10,000 $10,000

RW Land DDR $10,544,654

RW Support DDR $515,970DIH

Construction DDR $48,354,820

CEI DDR DIH $6,382,838

Total For Project 438379.3 $2,010,000 $2,010,000 $65,798,282

RESURFACING Work Mix:

439847.1 SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE

Extra Description: 32-42 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR PAVEMENT CORING NPV = 7,586,090; B/C RATIO = 21

PM: Alexander Estrada


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction ACSA $575,000 $575,000

ACSS $378,498 $378,498DDR $2,105,585 $2,105,585DS $4,211,858 $4,211,858

CEI ACSS $100,237 $100,237DDR $90,745 $90,745DIH $94,761 $94,761DS $793,697 $793,697




TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY Work Mix:

440568.1 SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD @ FLORESTA DR

Extra Description: 2017 TPO CMP PRIORITY #2 LFA WITH PORT ST LUCIE PROJECT NEEDS RIGHT OF WAY

PM: Cesar Martinez


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. CIGP $500,000 $500,000

DIH $10,000 $10,000LF $500,000 $500,000

Construction CIGP $1,619,296LF

CEI CIGP $153,836DIH LF


DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Work Mix:

441714.1 SR-5/US-1 FROM EDWARDS ROAD TO SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE

Extra Description: DRAINAGE/STORM WATER UPGRADES G/W 441715-1

PM: Vandana Nagole



DS $429,828 $429,828

Construction DS $40,000 $2,581,351 $2,621,351

CEI DIH $116,161 $116,161DS $387,529 $387,529

ENV DS $20,000 $25,000 $45,000




DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Work Mix:

441715.1 OUTFALL FOR SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE

Extra Description: G/W 441714-1

PM: Vandana Nagole



DS $341,000 $341,000

Construction DS $2,173,372 $2,173,372

CEI DIH $102,394 $102,394DS $336,532 $336,532


BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION Work Mix:

443595.1 SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD OVER LONG CREEK & N FORK ST LUCIE RIVER BRDG

Extra Description: BRIDGE 940139, 940144, 940140, 940145 SCOUR COUNTERMEASURES

PM: Daniel Gonzalez


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. BRRP $200,000 $200,000

DIH $10,000 $10,000

Construction BRRP $677,455 $677,455

CEI BRRP $128,714 $128,714DIH $54,196 $54,196

ENV BRRP $10,000 $5,000 $15,000

Total For Project 443595.1 $220,000 $5,000 $860,365 $1,085,365

LIGHTING Work Mix:

443685.1 SR-70/OKEECHOBEE ROAD AT CR-512/MIDWAY ROAD

Extra Description: ANTICIPATED NPV=$326,460; B/C=1.93; INSTALL NEW LIGHTING AT THE SUBJECT INTERSECTION TO BE COMPLIANT WITH THE CURRENT FDOT STANDARDS.

PM: Helen James


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction ACSS $225,925 $225,925

CEI ACSS $102,600 $102,600




RESURFACING Work Mix:

443997.1 SR-615 FROM NORTH OF AVE Q TO ST LUCIE BLVD

Extra Description:

PM: Kenzot Jasmin


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. DDR $299,939 $299,939

DIH $15,000 $15,000

Construction DDR $1,296,933 $1,296,933

CEI DDR $194,542 $194,542DIH $58,362 $58,362

ENV DS $10,000 $5,000 $15,000


FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 03 Total $51,249,971 $14,839,838 $96,272,573 $63,740,767 $2,414,385 $228,517,534 $67,571,414

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 06 NON-INTRASTATE OFF STATE HIWAY


231440.2 W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1

Extra Description: WIDEN 2 LANES TO 4 LANES/10MPO PRIORITY# 1 REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE,ADA RAMPS AT 3 SIGNALIZED INTERSEC CONSTRUCT 5' SIDEWALKS,LANDSCAPING,LIGHTING,BRICK PAVERS, DRAINAGE,4' BIKE LANE ON ROADWAY/PD&E BY COUNTY=SEG#1 LFA WITH COUNTY FOR PHASE 4B $246,723=LFF PH 4B (SEE IC) R/W FUNDED/SAFETEA-LU EARMARK HPP 610 (FOR C2 DESC SEE SC) C201=CONTAM.;C202=CULTURAL.;C203=SECT 4F;C204=WETLAND REVIEW 5601=FP&L DISTRIBUTION UTILITY RELOCATION COST. 5602=FPUA GAS UTILITY RELOCATION ESTIMATED COST. 5603=FPUA WATER UTILITY RELOCATION ESTIMATED COST. 6203=MATERIAL TESTING? 6210=MATERIALS TESTING (DISTRICT MAT LAB)

PM: Alexander Barr


FORT PIERCE City:

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land SA $27,117 $27,117

SU $1,955,978 $1,955,978

Total For Project 231440.2 $1,955,978 $27,117 $1,983,095




231440.3 W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD. TO SELVITZ ROAD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #2 WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES LFA WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY FOR PD&E AND DESIGN CK #09828620 REC'D FR ST. LUCIE CO. BCC FOR 1.65M ON 10/7/14 FOR PD&E.THIS IS A CAT2; CST RESERVE ON 438543-1 2202-VE STUDY WORKSHOP CHECK REC'D 1/25/2017 FROM ST.LUCIE CO. $2,108,000 PH31/32 31/32: LFA W/ST. LUCIE COUNTY (EXEC. 01/18/2017) CONSTRUCTION SPLIT OUT TO 231440-4/5 PH31/32.01= CHECK RECEIVED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY $150,000 CK#09838900,REC'D 5/16/18

PM: Haiyan Ou


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land SA $989,774 $582,781 $1,572,555

SU $2,692,273 $2,692,273

ENV SU $20,000 $20,000



431752.2 PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #2 PH C2-10 CONTAMINTATION ASSESSMENT PH C2-20 CULTURAL ASSESSMENTS PH C2-40 ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PH C2-70 GOPHER TORTOISE WORK WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES CONSTRUCTION SPLIT OUT TO SEG 5 AND 6

PM: Vandana Nagole

Cont. Class: RIGHT OF WAY ONLY

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land SU $53,082 $97,469 $150,551



431752.3 PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM BECKER ROAD TO PAAR DRIVE

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #4 WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES

PM: Vandana Nagole


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. SU $2,010,000 $2,010,000

RW Support SU $1,735,823 $1,735,823

RW Land SU $921,950 $921,950

Construction SU $14,313,980

CEI SU $2,203,165

ENV SU $50,000 $10,000 $60,000

Total For Project 431752.3 $2,010,000 $50,000 $10,000 $2,657,773 $4,727,773 $18,720,310



ADD LEFT TURN LANE(S) Work Mix:

431752.4 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM DARWIN BLVD TO GATLIN BLVD

Extra Description: TRIP JPA WITH CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE SIDEWALK, PED LIGHTING & CLOSED DRAINAGE

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction LF $2,330,000 $2,330,000

TRIP $1,006,345 $1,006,345TRWR $1,323,655 $1,323,655



431752.6 PORT ST.LUCIE BLVD FROM SOUTH OF ALCANTARRA BV TO SOUTH OF DARWIN BLVD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #2 WIDENING FROM 2 TO 4 LANES DESIGN AND RIGHT OF WAY ON 431752-2

PM: Vandana Nagole


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedIncentive SU $125,433

Construction SA $252,298 $252,298SU $41,811 $3,509,461 $3,551,272TRIP $2,738,718 $2,738,718TRWR $693,281 $693,281

CEI SA $160,799 $160,799SU $611,671 $611,671TRIP $503,360 $503,360

Total For Project 431752.6 $41,811 $8,469,588 $8,511,399 $125,433

FUNDING ACTION Work Mix:

438543.1 W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD - RESERVE

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #2 RESERVE FOR FM 231440-3

PM: Haiyan Ou

Cont. Class: BOX ITEM

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction SA $1,000,000 $1,000,000

SU $1,000,000 $1,000,000




SIDEWALK Work Mix:

441566.1 OLEANDER AVENUE FROM MIDWAY ROAD TO SOUTH MARKET AVENUE

Extra Description: 2017 TAP TPO PRIORITY #1 LAP W/ ST. LUCIE COUNTY

PM: Mya Williams

Cont. Class: LOCAL AGCY PGM (LAP)

Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedJPA/LAP Construction LF $236,203 $236,203

TALT $390,172 $390,172TALU $279,637 $279,637

CEI TALU $27,650 $27,650


EMERGENCY OPERATIONS Work Mix:

443224.1 HURRICANE IRMA PERMANENT RESTORATION: CR-611B/EDWARDS RD. SINKHOLE

Extra Description: GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER #17-235, DTD 09/04/2017 EMERGENCY REPAIR PH.G8 PERMANENT REPAIR PH:58 DDIR#IR-94-003 SIGNED BY M.CLASGENS XX/XX/2018 DRAFT DDIR IN PROGRESS

PM: William Wang


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedJPA/LAP Construction ACER $650,518 $650,518

CEI ACER $197,850 $197,850


SIDEWALK Work Mix:

444348.1 CURTIS STREET FROM NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD TO NW FLORESTA DRIVE

Extra Description: 2019 TPO TAP PRIORITY #1 LAP WITH CITY OF PORT ST.LUCIE

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. TALU $5,000 $5,000

JPA/LAP Construction LF $223,261 $223,261TALT $325,396 $325,396

CEI TALT $18,716 $18,716




SIDEWALK Work Mix:

444349.1 ALCANTARRA BLVD FROM SW SAVONA BLVD TO SW PORT ST.LUCIE BLVD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO TAP PRIORITY #2 LAP W/ THE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. TALU $5,000 $5,000

JPA/LAP Construction LF $253,791 $253,791TALT $325,398 $325,398

CEI TALU $22,376 $22,376


INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Work Mix:

444706.1 PRIMA VISTA BLVD @ AIROSO BLVD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO CMP PRIORITY #3 LAP WITH CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE ADD RAISED MEDIANS; EMERGENCY SIGNAL AT SW SRAVENSWOOD LN; ADD MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. SA $5,000 $5,000

JPA/LAP Construction SU $250,000 $250,000

CEI SU $12,500 $12,500


TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/SYSTEMWork Mix:

444707.1 GATLIN BLVD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO PORT ST LUCIE BLVD

Extra Description: 2019 TPO CMP PRIORITY #4 LAP WITH PORT ST LUCIE INSTALL TRAFFIC CAMERAS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS; OPTIMIZE GREEN TIME, ADD ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedP.E. SA $5,000 $5,000

JPA/LAP Construction SU $280,000 $280,000

CEI SU $13,400 $13,400


FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 06 Total $5,887,202 $9,048,302 $1,183,938 $2,962,084 $10,762,988 $29,844,514 $18,845,743

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 08 TRANSIT



OPERATING/ADMIN. ASSISTANCE Work Mix:

407185.3 ST. LUCIE COUNTY SECTION 5311 OPERATING RURAL FUNDS

Extra Description:

PM: Wibet Hay


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DU $56,256 $59,069 $62,023 $65,124 $64,613 $307,085

LF $56,256 $59,069 $62,023 $65,124 $64,613 $307,085

Total For Project 407185.3 $112,512 $118,138 $124,046 $130,248 $129,226 $614,170

OPERATING/ADMIN. ASSISTANCE Work Mix:

407187.3 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BLOCK GRANT OPERATING ASSISTANCE

Extra Description:

PM: Wibet Hay


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DDR $703,638 $752,024 $1,455,662

DPTO $618,686 $649,627 $682,108 $1,950,421LF $618,686 $649,627 $682,108 $703,638 $752,024 $3,406,083

Total For Project 407187.3 $1,237,372 $1,299,254 $1,364,216 $1,407,276 $1,504,048 $6,812,166

CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE Work Mix:

413494.1 ST.LUCIE COUNTY SECTION 5307 FORMULA FUNDS

Extra Description: FY11 - GRANT FL-90-X727 EXECUTED PER K.SCOTT-ST.LUCIE CO EMAIL FROM J. MELI 10/13/10. GRANT FL90-X765 EXECUTED 10/20/11 $1,407,322 EMAIL FROM K. SCOTT/SLC 1-11-12 TO J. MELI. ST.LUCIE COUNTY SEC 5307 OPERATING ASSISTANCE

PM: Jayne Pietrowski


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating FTA $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $13,470,000

Total For Project 413494.1 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $2,694,000 $13,470,000

PTO STUDIES Work Mix:

413737.2 ST. LUCIE TPO SECTION "5305D" TRANSIT PLANNING

Extra Description: TRANSIT PLANNING STUDIES

PM: Wibet Hay


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedPlanning DPTO $11,529 $11,529

DU $71,465 $71,465LF $11,529 $11,529




PTO STUDIES Work Mix:

413737.3 ST. LUCIE TPO SECTION "5305D" TRANSIT PLANNING

Extra Description: TRANSIT PLANNING STUDIES

PM: Wibet Hay


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedPlanning DPTO $9,190 $9,466 $9,190 $9,190 $37,036

DU $73,518 $75,724 $73,518 $73,518 $296,278LF $9,190 $9,466 $9,190 $9,190 $37,036


PARK AND RIDE LOTS Work Mix:

422681.4 GATLIN BLVD. BETWEEN BRESCIA STREET AND EDGARCE STREET

Extra Description: 2014 TPO #4

PM: Raul Dominguez


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedRW Land DS $584,171 $2,290,597 $2,874,768

Construction DDR $2,815,612 $2,815,612

CEI DDR $422,342 $422,342DIH $127,173 $127,173

ENV DS $200,000 $200,000


CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE Work Mix:

434548.1 ST.LUCIE COUNTY SECTION 5339 CAPITAL FOR BUS & BUS FACILITIES

Extra Description: ST.LUCIE CO. SECTION 5339 CAPITAL FOR BUS & BUS FACILITIES PROGRAM 16. CAPITAL FOR FIXED ROUTE



Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating FTA $197,400 $197,400 $197,400 $198,000 $198,000 $988,200

Total For Project 434548.1 $197,400 $197,400 $197,400 $198,000 $198,000 $988,200



OPERATING FOR FIXED ROUTE Work Mix:

441597.1 ST LUCIE COUNTY FARE FREE TRANSIT PILOT

Extra Description: SERVICE DEVELOPMENT GRANT



Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DPTO $140,000 $140,000

LF $140,000 $140,000



442568.1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY FIXED ROUTE

Extra Description: ROUTE 1 IMPROVEMENTS




LF $200,000 $200,000



444664.1 ST. LUCIE TRANSIT CORRIDOR LAKEWOOD PARK REGIONAL ROUTE

Extra Description: REGIONAL ROUTE, ST. LUCIE - INDIAN RIVER COUNTIES



Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DPTO $180,000 $180,000 $360,000


FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 08 Total $9,345,105 $6,871,287 $4,474,318 $4,521,422 $4,617,172 $29,829,304


TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 09 AVIATION

AVIATION PRESERVATION PROJECT Work Mix:

434635.1 TREASURE COAST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRFIELD SIGNAGE & LIGHTING

Extra Description:

PM: Laurie McDermott



FAA $1,620,000 $1,620,000LF $90,000 $90,000



440106.1 TREASURE COAST INTERNATIONAL RUNWAY 14/32 AIRFIELD LIGHTING & SIGNAGE

Extra Description:




LF $40,000 $40,000


AVIATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTWork Mix:

441609.1 TREASURE COAST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXTENSION FOR RWY 28L/10R EA

Extra Description:




FAA $368,550 $368,550LF $20,475 $20,475



442102.1 TREASURE COAST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONSTRUCT MICROSURFACING RW 14/12

Extra Description:



Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating DPTO $2,240,000 $2,240,000

LF $560,000 $560,000



TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 09 AVIATION

FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 09 Total $5,209,500 $5,209,500

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 11 SEAPORT

SEAPORT CAPACITY PROJECT Work Mix:

444456.1 PORT OF FORT PIERCE MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Extra Description:

PM: Kevin Lindgren


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating LF $100,000 $100,000

PORT $100,000 $100,000


SEAPORT CAPACITY PROJECT Work Mix:

444457.1 PORT OF FORT PIERCE REHABILITATION OF SOUTH DOCK

Extra Description: SEQ01 INCLUDING WAREHOUSE DEMO,SITE PREP, AND NEW CONCRETE.

PM: Kevin Lindgren


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedCapital Improvement/Operating LF $313,177 $313,177

PORT $313,177 $313,177


FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 11 Total $826,354 $826,354

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 13 NON-SYSTEM SPECIFIC

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Work Mix:

439326.2 ST. LUCIE FY 2018/2019-2019/2020 UPWP

Extra Description: 2019 TPO PRIORITY #1

PM: Myroslava Skoroden


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedPlanning PL $536,231 $536,231

SU $300,000 $300,000





439326.3 ST. LUCIE FY 2020/2021-2021/2022 UPWP




Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedPlanning PL $547,631 $547,631 $1,095,262

SU $300,000 $300,000 $600,000

Total For Project 439326.3 $847,631 $847,631 $1,695,262


439326.4 ST. LUCIE FY 2022/2023-2023/2024 UPWP




Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedPlanning PL $547,631 $547,631

SU $300,000 $300,000 $600,000

Total For Project 439326.4 $847,631 $300,000 $1,147,631

BIKE PATH/TRAIL Work Mix:

439999.1 SAVANNAS PRESERVE STATE PARK GAP WALTON RD.TO SAVANNAS RECREATION AREA

Extra Description: SUNTRAIL FY2017 PD&E CONSTRUCTION ON 439999-2, 439999-3

PM: Aycel Freda


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedENV TLWR $75,000 $75,000



439999.2 SAVANNAS PRESERVE STATE PARK GAP FROM WALTON RD TO LENNARD RD

Extra Description: SUNTRAIL FY2017 PD&E PHASE 1, DESIGN ON 439999-1

PM: Aycel Freda


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction TLWR $5,293,651 $5,293,651

CEI DIH $79,405 $79,405TLWR $751,699 $751,699





439999.3 SAVANNAS PRESERVE STATE PARK FR LENNARD RD TO SAVANNAS RECREATION AREA

Extra Description: SUNTRAIL FY2017 PD&E PHASE 2; DESIGN ON 439999-1

PM: Aycel Freda


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedConstruction TLWR $2,388,650 $2,388,650

CEI DIH $136,465 $136,465TLWR $408,848 $408,848

ENV TLWR $75,000 $75,000



440032.1 FEC OVERPASS FROM SAVANNAS RECREATION AREA TO SOUTH OF SAVANNAH RD.

Extra Description: SUNTRAIL

PM: Aycel Freda



TLWR $325,000 $325,000

RW Support DIH $12,000 $12,000DS $14,250 $14,250

RW Land DS $33,127 $33,127

Construction TLWR $2,295,000

CEI DIH TLWR $485,275

ENV TLWR $115,000 $115,000

Total For Project 440032.1 $330,000 $174,377 $504,377 $2,780,275

FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 13 Total $911,231 $6,972,386 $1,252,631 $3,955,971 $300,000 $13,392,219 $2,780,275


TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM: 16 OFF STATE HWY SYS/OFF FED SYS


440018.1 NORTH MACEDO BLVD FROM SELVITZ RD TO ST JAMES DR

Extra Description: 2016 TPO TAP PRIORITY #1 LAP W/CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE FIVE-FOOT SIDEWALK ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ROADWAY

PM: Mya Williams


Phase Fund Code FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total UnfundedJPA/LAP Construction LF $152,683 $152,683

TALT $343,309 $343,309TALU $270,447 $270,447

CEI TALU $27,990 $27,990


FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Year Total SIS 2ND 5 UnfundedHIGHWAY SYSTEM: 16 Total $794,429 $794,429

St. Lucie Total $74,523,792 $39,421,601 $125,434,386 $85,455,178 $18,644,545 $343,479,502 $2,110,000 $204,940,650


$343,479,502Total 5 Year Program: Total

Box Funds for supplementals, overruns, litigation, AC conversions

Capital Improvement / Operating

Capital Improvements and/or Operating Costs

CEI Construction Engineering Inspection

Design Build Includes all phases, let as one contract for PE, Construction. Let in the District

District Contract Contracts let in the District

Extern Mngd (Not LAP) Joint Particiapation Agreement - Interagency method to exchange funds

FM # Financial Management Number, aka Financial Project ID

Force Account Force account / external

JPA Joint Participation Agreement - Interagency method to exchange funds

Local Agcy Pgm (LAP) Local Agency Program - Interagency method to exchange funds

PD&E Project Development and Environmental (studies)

PE Preliminary Engineering

PTO Public Transportation

R/W Right of Way

ROW Right of Way

ROW Adv. Acq. Advanced Acquisition of Right of Way only.

SA Supplemental Agreement

To Be Let Contract let in Tallahassee

Glossary of Terms and Accronyms


Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2019/20 through FY 2023/24

Summary of Projects FDOT District Four

1 – As of October 31, 2018

DISTRICT FOUR PROJECT OVERVIEW

Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise continues to make significant project investments in District Four. In FY 2018 and FY 2019, Turnpike projects total over $734 million within Broward, Indian River, Martin, Palm Beach, and St Lucie Counties.

The following summarizes project phase information that is referenced in subsequent project tables.

Phase Funding Code

ENV Environmental C2, C8

PE Preliminary Engineering 31, 32

ROW Right of Way 41, 43, 45, 4B

RRU Railroad and Utilities 56, 57

CST Construction 52, 53, 54, 58, 61, 62

Summary of Major Project Funding by Project Type

The table below summarizes the funding programmed for the major Turnpike projects in the Tentative Five-Year Work Program (FY 2019/20 through FY 2023/24) that are located in District Four.

Project Type Fiscal Year

5 Year Total FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024

Add Lanes & Reconstruction $8,715,000 $28,970,000 $229,808,000 $200,947,000 $309,310,000 $777,750,000

Resurfacing $2,246,000 $21,531,000 $19,958,000 $0 $0 $43,735,000

Other $1,000,000 $0 $0 $12,262,000 $0 $13,262,000

All-Electronic Tolling $15,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,700,000

Major Projects Total $27,661,000 $50,501,000 $249,766,000 $213,209,000 $309,310,000 $850,447,000

Summary of Major Projects by County

The major Turnpike project expenditures by county in the Tentative Five-Year Work Program are shown in the following table. The five-year funding amount for All-Electronic Tolling (AET) Phase 8 ($15,700,000), a major regional project spanning Palm Beach, Martin, St Lucie, and Indian River Counties in District Four, Okeechobee County in District One, and Osceola County in District Five, is included in the “Regional” row.

County Fiscal Year


Broward $9,161,000 $49,121,000 $235,543,000 $200,947,000 $10,840,000 $505,612,000

Palm Beach $2,800,000 $1,380,000 $14,223,000 $12,262,000 $298,470,000 $329,135,000

Regional $15,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,700,000

Total $27,661,000 $50,501,000 $249,766,000 $213,209,000 $309,310,000 $850,447,000




Truck Parking at the West Palm Beach Service Plaza (MP 94) FPN: 442625-1

The project expands truck parking at the West Palm Beach Service Plaza. Work includes concrete pavement design, potential Turnpike / SR 91 off-ramp widening, pond reconstruction, roadside ditch reconstruction, and lighting improvements at the plaza.

Phase Fiscal Year


PE $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000

CST $0 $0 $0 $12,262,000 $0 $12,262,000

Total $1,000,000 $0 $0 $12,262,000 $0 $13,262,000

Regional Projects

Implement All-Electronic Tolling (AET) Phase 8 on the Turnpike / SR 91 FPN: 431737-1

The project implements Phase 8 of an overall program to convert portions of the Turnpike System to a cashless, all-electronic toll collection system. The limits of AET Phase 8 conversion project begin at Lantana Toll Plaza (MP 88) on the Turnpike / SR 91 in Palm Beach County, and extend north through Martin, St Lucie, Indian River, and Okeechobee Counties, to the Three Lakes Toll Plaza (MP 236) on the Turnpike / SR 91 in Osceola County. The AET Phase 8 conversion project includes the removal and replacement of 30 ramp toll plazas and two mainline toll plazas. Project Length: 148.0 miles

Phase Fiscal Year


CST $15,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,700,000

Total $15,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,700,000




Summary of Minor Project Funding by Project Type

Minor projects may include bridge paintings, signing/pavement markings, communications, guardrail/safety improvements, landscaping, canal revetment, and other miscellaneous types. The table below summarizes the funding programmed for minor projects for Turnpike roadways throughout the District.

Project Type Fiscal Year

5 Year TotalFY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024

Bridge Painting $2,571,000 $1,479,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,050,000

Signing/Pavement Markings $9,994,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,994,000

Miscellaneous $5,542,000 $2,996,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,538,000

Minor Projects Total $18,107,000 $4,475,000 $0 $0 $0 $22,582,000

Summary of All Project Funding

Projects Fiscal Year


Minor Projects Total $18,107,000 $4,475,000 $0 $0 $0 $22,582,000

Major Projects Total $27,661,000 $50,501,000 $249,766,000 $213,209,000 $309,310,000 $850,447,000

Total $45,768,000 $54,976,000 $249,766,000 $213,209,000 $309,310,000 $873,029,000







AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY



Item Number: 9c

Item Title: 2019 Legislative Priorities

Item Origination: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)

UPWP Reference: Task 1.1 – Program Management

Requested Action: Review and recommend adoption of the proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities,

recommend adoption with conditions, or do not recommend adoption.

Staff Recommendation: Based on the recommendation of the TPO Advisory Committees, the priorities being

included in 2018 State legislation that was filed, the support of the priorities by other

organizations, and the consistency of the priorities with the Go2040 Long Range

Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives, it is recommended that the proposed

2019 Legislative Priorities be adopted.

Attachments

· Staff Report · Draft 2019 Legislative Priorities

· Florida Bicycle Association Legislative Platform

· FL DNT TXT N DRIVE Coalition Distracted Driving Information




MEMORANDUM


FROM: Peter Buchwald Executive Director


SUBJECT: 2019 Legislative Priorities

BACKGROUND

Task 1.1, Program Management, of the FY 2018/19 - FY 2019/20 Unified

Planning Work Program of the St. Lucie TPO includes the annual adoption of legislative priorities for the TPO. The proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities

(attached) have been developed for review and adoption by the TPO Board.

ANALYSIS

During the discussion of the adoption of the 2018 Legislative Priorities by the Board in October 2017, dissatisfaction was expressed with the same priorities

being adopted year after year. The Board also discussed not numbering the priorities because it may provide the false impression that the priorities are

ranked.

Therefore, as part of the development of the 2019 Legislative Priorities, each of the 2018 Legislative Priorities was reexamined. Long-standing legislative

priorities that appear to have little opportunity for incorporation into 2019 State legislation because they do not have the support of the Florida

Department of Transportation (FDOT) or organizations other than the Florida

Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council (MPOAC) were reconsidered. In their places, legislative priorities from other transportation

organizations such as the Florida Bicycle Association (FBA) which are consistent with the TPO’s priorities, which are supported by FDOT, or were

included in past unsuccessful legislation were developed.


The FBA’s 2019 Legislative Platform is attached from which two of the

proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities for the TPO were developed pertaining to reducing distracted driving and protecting vulnerable road users. Both of these

priorities were included in State legislation filed for the 2018 Legislative Session which died in committees during the Session. Additional information

regarding distracted driving from the FL DNT TXT N DRIVE Coalition also is attached.

The third legislative priority maximizes local funding by banning legislative

appropriations for individual transportation projects (commonly referred to as earmarks) and creates a competitive grant program that funds local Complete

Streets projects. In addition to being consistent with FBA’s priority supporting FDOT’s Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail Program and Complete Streets

initiatives, this priority is supported by FDOT and the MPOAC.

The proposed priorities are not numbered in order to address the concern of

the TPO Board with regard to providing the false impression that the priorities are ranked. The following matrix compares the proposed 2019 Legislative

Priorities to the Go2040 Goals and Objectives for consistency:

Go2040 LRTP Goals Legislative Priority Title Goals Objectives

1 Economic Prosperity

and Growth

Provide for efficient transportation that serves local and regional needs and

stimulates economic prosperity and growth

Enable people and goods to

move around efficiently

Maximizes Local Transportation Funding

Increase the transportation options and improve access to destinations that support prosperity and growth

2 Choices Ensure transportation choices for all residents, visitors, and businesses

Improve the bicycle/pedestrian and public transportation networks Protects Vulnerable

Road Users Maximizes Local Transportation Funding

Provide for transportation needs of the transportation

disadvantaged that may include the use of automated vehicles

3

Existing

Assets and Services

Maintain the condition and improve the efficiency of transportation assets and services

Maintain the condition of existing transportation assets

Maximizes Local Transportation Funding Improve the efficiency of

existing transportation services

4 Cooperation

Improve land use and transportation decision-making through community participation and intergovernmental cooperation

Facilitate unified transportation decision-

making through intergovernmental cooperation

Maximizes Local Transportation Funding

Ensure community participation is representative


Go2040 LRTP Goals Legislative Priority Title Goals Objectives

5 Health and Environment

Protect and enhance public health and the environment

Support healthy living strategies, programs and improvements

Reduces Distracted Driving Protects Vulnerable Road Users Maximizes Local Transportation Funding

Make transportation

investments that minimize impacts to the natural environment and allocate resources toward mitigation

6 Safety and

Security

Provide safer and more secure

transportation

Improve the safety of the transportation system that

may include the incorporation of infrastructure in support of automated vehicles

Reduces Distracted Driving Protects Vulnerable Road Users Maximizes Local Transportation Funding

Improve the transportation system’s stability/resiliency in

the event of climate change, emergencies, or disasters

Based on the matrix, the proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities are consistent with the Go2040 LRTP Goals and Objectives.


reviewed the proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities and recommended them for adoption with the addition of “bicyclists and disabled individuals using mobility

devices” to the priority pertaining to protecting vulnerable road users. The proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities were revised to incorporate this addition.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the recommendation of the TPO Advisory Committees, the priorities being included in 2018 State legislation that was filed, the support of the

priorities by other organizations, and the consistency of the priorities with the

Go2040 LRTP Goals and Objectives, it is recommended that the proposed 2019 Legislative Priorities be adopted.




DRAFT

2019

LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES (Adopted _____________)

The St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) supports legislation that:

· Reduces distracted driving by regulating as a primary offense the use of electronic wireless communications devices and other similar distracting devices, unless they are in a hands-free mode of operation, while operating a moving motor vehicle.

· Protects vulnerable road users by expanding the current Move Over Law to include pedestrians, bicyclists, and disabled individuals using mobility devices.

· Maximizes local transportation funding by banning specific State legislative appropriations for individual transportation projects (commonly referred to as earmarks) and creating a competitive grant program that funds local Complete Streets projects.

Please Note: Background information on each of the 2019 Legislative Priorities is provided on the back of this page.

2019 Legislative Priorities DRAFT Page 2 of 2

Background Information

Reduces Distracted Driving: The 2013 Florida Legislature enacted the “Florida Ban on Texting While

Driving Law”. The law prohibits the operation of a moving motor vehicle while manually typing, sending, or reading interpersonal communication, such as texts or emails, using a wireless communications device. The law provides for enforcement of the ban as a secondary offense meaning a driver would have to be pulled over for another violation to receive a ticket for violating the ban on texting. Since the enactment of this legislation, crashes due to districted driving have increased which demonstrates the need to substantially increase the penalty for distracted driving. Therefore, the enforcement mechanism for the texting while driving ban should be strengthened by making texting

while driving a primary offense. Senate Bill 90 filed for the 2018 Legislative Session would have authorized law enforcement officers to stop motor vehicles and issue citations to persons who are texting while driving. However, the bill died in the Appropriations Committee. With the widespread support of more than 80 public and private organizations through the FL DNT TXT N DRIVE Coalition, this legislation is expected to be refiled for

the 2019 Legislative Session. Protects Vulnerable Road Users: Year after year, Florida consistently ranks as one of the worst 5 states nationally for pedestrian fatalities and fatality rates. However, Florida law is limited to the current 3-foot passing requirement when vehicles are approaching cyclists and must be expanded to end this unfortunate tradition especially in light of continuing population growth.

House Bill 117 filed for the 2018 Legislative Session would have would revised Florida Statute 316.126 to include requirements for drivers of motor vehicles when overtaking vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, bicyclists, and disabled individuals using mobility devices, to vacate the lane being used by or next to the vulnerable road user similar to the requirements for overtaking an emergency vehicle on the side of the road. However, the bill died in the Transportation Committee. It is anticipated for this legislation to be refiled for the 2019 Legislative Session.

Maximizes Local Transportation Funding: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Florida Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) oppose specific State legislative appropriations (earmarks) for local governments for transportation projects in the Florida Legislative Budget because of the following:

· The specific appropriation rarely covers the entire cost of the project;

· According to Florida Statutes, any transportation project which is identified by a specific

appropriation is deducted from the State funds annually distributed to the FDOT District. Therefore, the appropriation does not result in any additional or new funds to the local area;

· The specific appropriation is subject to the Governor's line-item veto, and if vetoed, anything having to do with the project, such as a design or right-of-way acquisition phase that may be underway, must be removed from the FDOT Work Program for at least a year and may not be added back for 5 more years; and,

· If the project is delayed and is not ready for production in the year of the specific

appropriation, the appropriation is lost which is frequently experienced by the local

governments. Any transportation projects needed by the local governments should be advanced through the MPO process, or the local governments should apply for Federal or State grants for the project rather than requesting a specific appropriation through a State legislator. To replace the specific appropriations for transportation, a competitive State grant program with dedicated annual funding

like the Florida Shared-Use Nonmotorized (SUN) Trail funding program should be developed to fund local Complete Streets projects.

Florida Bicycle Association | PO Box 2452 | Oldsmar, FL 34677 | 813.748.1513

Florida Bicycle Association Legislative Platform

The Florida Bicycle Association (FBA) supports statutory provisions to ensure the safety and rights of bicyclists. To achieve this goal, we ask Florida’s legislators to consider the following:

· Expand the current Move Over law to include PEOPLE. o This consideration will replace the current 3-Ft passing law for bicyclists, deemed

unenforceable by numerous law enforcement agencies. o See 2018 CS/HB 117

· Make texting while driving a primary offense for all drivers and pass a hand-held device ban.

o See 2018 SB 90 / HB 121 o See 2018 SB 90 949778 Amendment (Delete All)

· Create E-Bike statutory definition to match national efforts (PeopleforBikes).

· Clean up statutory language with regards to definitions of sidewalks, crosswalks, lane position of bicyclists and other related matters.

· Continue to support FDOT’s SUNTrail and Complete Streets initiatives, in addition to funding initiatives for natural surface trails.

Financial Status: Nonprofit 501(c)(3) Profile: FBA was incorporated in 1997 for educational and charitable purposes. FBA serves on the Florida Department of Transportation’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council, Florida Department of Transportation’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Focused Initiative, Florida Suncoast SAFE KIDS Coalition and the Florida Greenways and Trails Foundation. Purpose: FBA provides materials to educate bicyclists, pedestrians and motorists about safely sharing roadways and paths. FBA acts as a voice for the needs of bicyclists through positive relationships with legislators, law enforcement agencies, the Florida Department of Transportation and local transportation-planning organizations to uphold cyclist rights. FBA encourages the creation of great on-road and off-road places to ride; provides a statewide communications network for bicyclists; and motivates more people to bicycle more often. Management: Becky Afonso, Executive Director Media Contact: Becky Afonso, P.O. Box 2452, Oldsmar, FL 34677 [email protected]

Website: www.floridabicycle.org

730 East Park Ave Tallahassee, FL 32301

Distracted Driving - “Hands-Free” Laws Work

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) estimated that in 2015, 3,477 people were killed and 391,000 were injured in car crashes involving distracted driving (NHTSA Distracted Driving Overview). In the same year, the Centers for Disease Control estimated that 16% of all crashes with injuries and 10% of fatal crashes were due to distracted driving (CDC Distracted Driving Overview). As this relates to mobile technology specifically, “Unlike distractions such as eating, selecting pre-set radio stations, etc., electronic devices are more interactive and require greater time commitment and continual attention, response and manipulation to obtain a desired result.”1

In the same study, it was stated that sending and receiving a text message takes the driver’s eyes off the road on average of 4.6 seconds. That is the equivalent to driving blindfolded the distance of a football field at 55 miles per hour. Dr. Jonathan Rupp, the Co-Director of the Injury Prevention Research Center at Emory University testified before the committee and cited a study done by NHTSA that found a driver is twice as likely to be in a crash while driving distracted. The crash likelihood varied based on the type of distraction. For example, a driver is 12 times more likely to have a crash while dialing a phone as opposed to twice as likely when simply talking on one. As dangerous as distracted driving is in general, it is especially so for young drivers. Automobile crashes remain the number one killer of teenagers and young adults. According to data presented by DPS, between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2017, there were 780,062 crashes, 430,662 injuries, and 2,748 fatalities for driver’s aged 15 to 25. In 2017 alone, 5,683 of those crashes are attributed to distracted driving. The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety found in their 2015 study that 58% of teen crashes were due to driver distraction. In a number of surveys of teen drivers, as many as 41% percent reported reading social media while driving, 30% reported posting on social media, and 58% reported texting and driving. Drivers 19-24 years of age outpaced other drivers at 66.1% and 59.3% respectively for reading and sending communications. Distracted driving is clearly a national issue and one that must be addressed for the safety of all citizens. In an effort to make our roads safer, a coalition of law enforcement organizations, businesses and local governments have joined together in support of legislation to stop texting while driving. Florida took the first step in banning texting while driving in 2013 but now it’s time to strengthen the law. We would like to see the law strengthen. Georgia recently passed legislation to deal with districted driving and have decreased traffic deaths by 10%! Of the 15 states plus D.C. that have enacted “hands-free” laws, 13 of these states saw an average 17.5% decrease in traffic fatalities within two years after passing and enforcing their new laws.

Please support “Hands Free” Legislation and make Florida’s roads safer for all 1 Chase, C., U.S. State and Federal Laws Targeting Distracted Driving, Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol 58, pg. 84 (2014).

_____________________________________________________________________________ FL DNT TXT N DRIVE COALITION members include: AARP Anthony Phoenix Branca Foundation – APB Foundation Allstate American Insurance Association American Society of Safety Engineers Asphalt Contractors Association Audible Broadcasting AutoNation Bell Concrete Products BETER Mix Inc Bike/Walk Central Florida Blue Zones Project of SWFL Central Florida Expressway (CFX) Chemours City of Fort Myers City of Lake Helen City of Margate City of Orlando City of Pembroke Pines Coconut Creek Police Department Concrete Coalition of Florida (CCF) Concrete On Call Inc Enterprise Holdings Florida Academy of Physician Assistants Florida A.G.C. Council Florida Asphalt Contractors Association Florida Bicycle Association Florida Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics Florida Chapter of the American College of Physicians Florida Chapter of the American College of Surgeons Florida College of Emergency Physicians Florida Committee on Trauma Florida Concrete & Products Association Florida Independent Concrete & Associated Products Association Florida Insurance Council Florida Neurosurgery Society Florida Orthopedic Society Florida PTA Florida Police Chiefs Association FL Swimming Pool Association Florida Public Health Association Florida Public Transportation Association Florida Roof Deck Association Florida Sheriffs Association Florida Fire Sprinkler Association Florida Transportation Builders’ Association Florida Work Zone Safety Coalition

Griswold Ready Mix Concrete Hiab USA Kuhlman Concrete Lee County Commission Maschmeyer Concrete Company of FL Masonry Association of Florida (MAF) Milton Police Department Miami-Dade County Naples City Council Naples Pathways Coalition National Association of Credit Management- Improved Construction Practices Committee (NACM-ICPC) National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies National Safety Council National Waste & Recycling Association Nationwide Insurance Company North Florida Transportation Planning Organization Oviedo Police Department Parliament Building Products Personal Insurance Federation of Florida Polk Transportation Planning Organization Polk Vision’s Pedestrian Bicycle Safety Team Property Casualty Insurers Association of America Punta Gorda Police Department Quality Block & Supply, Inc. Quality Precast Co. R & R Rebar Fabricators, Inc. Republic Services Southwestern Suppliers, Inc. Stopdistractions.org Streets Alive of SWFL The Blue Zones Project of SWFL Town of Ponce Inlet Town of Southwest Ranches Uber USAA Walk Bike Tampa Walt Disney World Resort For more information about the FL DNT TXT N DRV COALITION Contact Keyna Cory – [email protected] (850) 566-9575

“As an advocate for children and youth, Florida PTA firmly believes that distracted driving, more specifically texting while driving, is an epidemic that puts our young drivers at a greater risk than any other danger on our highways. The startling statistics are growing, more youth are dying and only when we take stronger measures can we stop this epidemic in its tracks." says Cindy Gerhardt, Florida PTA President. "It is our belief that increasing opportunities to enforce this law by transitioning it from a secondary to a primary offense will force a new level of accountability and awareness to our youth that no text is worth the ending of a life full of potential and possibilities."

-Cindy Gerhardt, President Florida PTA

“On behalf of more than 2.8 million AARP Florida members, we thank state lawmakers for taking an important step toward safer roads for all of us,” said Jeff Johnson, AARP’s Florida state director. “As of 2016, 46 states, along with District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the US Virgin Islands, ban text messaging for all drivers. We want to thank Sen. Keith Perry and Rep. Emily Slosberg, who have been persistent, persuasive and ultimately successful in their fight for this legislation.”

- Jeff Johnson, AARP State Director “PCI is a proud supporter of the Florida Don’t Text and Drive Coalition and supports legislation that helps improve safety and reduce costs. The distracted driving epidemic must be addressed. We need to change driver behavior, and we believe toughening the distracted driving laws in Florida will save lives by encouraging people to think twice about picking up the phone while driving.”

-Logan McFaddin, Regional Manager Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

“Safety is a high priority for the members of NWRA. Too many of our workers have been killed or injured by people distracted while driving. Making texting while driving a primary offense will help keep our employees safe while they are on the streets,”

- Charlie Latham, NWRA FL Chapter Chair

“Our goal is to make Florida’s roads safer. Texting and driving is an epidemic on our roadways, and we want to do our part to help put an end to it,”

-Nicole T. Newell, Chemours, FL Site Plant Manager

“The Florida Police Chiefs Association is fully supportive of efforts to prohibit texting while driving as a crucial step toward making Florida’s roads safer. Distracted driving is incredibly dangerous, not only for our drivers but also for our officers out on the road, protecting our residents."

- Police Chief Kevin Lystad, Miami Shores, President of the Florida Police Chiefs Association

“The Florida Sheriffs Association supports this legislation and hopes it will encourage drivers to focus on their responsibility to operate vehicles in a safe manner on Florida highways. Distracted driving is a serious public safety issue and hopefully this will send a message to the public that this is a traffic safety priority for law enforcement throughout the state.”

- Walton County Sheriff Michael Adkinson, President of the Florida Sheriffs Association

"The Florida Work Zone Safety Coalition would like to thank Senator Perry and all sponsors who are supporting this most important bill. Attentive driving is critical to ensuring everyone is safe on Florida's roads, for both our construction workers and the traveling public. Because we know texting while driving is a proven hazard, all efforts to reduce it will improve safety on Florida's roads."

-Mark Marine, Chairman of the Florida Work Zone Safety Coalition




AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY



Item Number: 9d

Item Title: Safety Performance Targets

Item Origination: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), Federal Requirements, and the Florida Department of

Transportation (FDOT)

UPWP Reference: Task 2.4 - Performance Management

Requested Action: Adopt the proposed 2019 Safety Performance Targets, adopt with conditions, or do not adopt.

Staff Recommendation: Based on the recommendations of the TPO Advisory Committees and on sharing the

understanding with FDOT that the death or injury of any person is unacceptable while recognizing a

downward trend going forward in the safety performance in the TPO area, it is recommended

that the same targets as FDOT’s 2019 Safety Performance Targets and the Interim Safety

Performance Benchmarks for the TPO area be adopted.


· 2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program Excerpt




MEMORANDUM


THROUGH: Peter Buchwald Executive Director

FROM: Yi Ding

Livability Planner


SUBJECT: 2019 Safety Performance Targets

BACKGROUND

Federal Transportation Performance Management (TPM) requirements ensure

that State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) choose the most efficient investments for Federal

transportation funds. To comply with the requirement, State DOTs are required to establish statewide targets annually for the safety performance

measures, and MPOs have the option to support the statewide targets or adopt their own quantifiable targets for the MPO’s planning area. The St. Lucie TPO

incorporated TPM into its planning process by dedicating a task to it in the FY 2018/19-FY 2019/20 Unified Planning Work Program.

In October 2017, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) adopted

“0” for all five safety performance measures to reflect its goal of zero deaths and injuries. The TPO Board supported the FDOT 2018 Safety Targets in

December 2017 to comply with the Federal requirements. In September 2018, the FDOT submitted its Safety Performance Targets for calendar year 2019 to

the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). As expected, FDOT is staying

with its Vision Zero targets for all five safety performance measures. Consequently, to comply with the Federal requirements, the St. Lucie TPO

must support the FDOT Safety Performance Targets or establish its own targets by February 27, 2019.


ANALYSIS

According to the attached excerpt from the 2018 Florida Highway Safety

Improvement Program, an interim performance benchmark is required by FHWA in order to receive Federal funding. As meeting the target of zero deaths

and injuries will be a tremendous challenge, interim benchmarks also can be used to better demonstrate progress toward meeting the final targets. The

safety performance results for both FDOT and St. Lucie TPO, which include the 2017 results, compared to the interim benchmarks are provided as follows:

While FDOT and St. Lucie TPO’s 2017 safety performance results both meet their 2018 interim performance benchmarks, the data forecast indicates

Florida’s fatalities and injuries could continue to trend upward in 2018 and 2019. However, FDOT expects that the projects chosen for funding will

mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the number of traffic fatalities

and injuries.

As a result, FDOT has established the following 2019 interim performance benchmarks along with the final targets:

Fatality Fatality Rate* Serious InjurySerious Injury

Rate*

Non-Motorized

Fatality and

Serious Injuries

Statewide

2013 5-Year Rolling Average 2,448 1.27 16,434 8.49 2,951





2018 Interim Safety Performance Benchmarks 3,052 1.65 20,861 11.06 3,447

St. Lucie TPO

2013 5-Year Rolling Average 30 0.98 187 6.14 17





2018 Interim Safety Performance Benchmarks 38 1.10 159 4.64 25

*Rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

Data Source: Signal Four Analytics, FDOT Safety Office, FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics Office

2017 Safety Performance Results


Rate*

Non-Motorized

Fatality and

Serious Injuries

2019 Forecast Range 2,797-3,117 1.08-1.63 19,340-21,107 7.79-10.85 3,117-3,801

2019 Interim Safety Performance Benchmarks 3,117 1.63 21,107 10.85 3,801

Final Performance Targets 0 0 0 0 0


Data Source: FDOT 2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

2019 Safety Performance Targets, Statewide


As FDOT used the exact same approach this year as last year to forecast the numbers of fatalities and injuries, TPO staff utilized the same forecasting

methods developed last year to set the 2019 interim benchmarks while recognizing a recent downward trend as follows:

While the data forecast indicates St. Lucie TPO’s fatalities and injuries could

trend upward in 2018 and 2019 consistent with the Statewide averages, it appears to be appropriate to expect that the projects chosen by the TPO for

funding will support the recent downward trend in the TPO area and continue to reduce the number of traffic fatalities and injuries in the TPO area. In

addition, it appears to be appropriate for the TPO to share FDOT’s approach to safety that the death or injury of any person is unacceptable. Finally, as

partnering with FDOT in meeting the safety targets would optimize the use of

Federal funds, it appears to be appropriate for the TPO to adopt the same targets as FDOT’s 2019 Safety Performance Targets. The TPO’s Interim Safety

Performance Benchmarks will continue to be used to demonstrate the TPO’s progress in meeting its targets.


recommended the adoption of the same targets as FDOT’s 2019 Safety Performance Targets and the Interim Safety Performance Benchmarks for the

TPO.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the recommendations of the TPO Advisory Committees and on

sharing the understanding with FDOT that the death or injury of any person is

unacceptable while recognizing a downward trend going forward in the safety performance in the TPO area, it is recommended that the same targets as

FDOT’s 2019 Safety Performance Targets and the Interim Safety Performance Benchmarks for the TPO area be adopted.


Rate*

Non-Motorized

Fatality and

Serious Injuries



Final Performance Targets 0 0 0 0 0


2019 Safety Performance Targets, St. Lucie TPO

Data Source: Signal Four Analytics, FDOT Safety Office, FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics Office

2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 1 of 3

34. Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2019 Targets *

Number of Fatalities 0.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total fatalities on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 2,797 and 3,117 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for fatalities is zero in 2019. While the data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatalities could continue to trend upward in 2018 and 2019, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the number of traffic fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for fatalities is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 3,117 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.

Number of Serious Injuries 0.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 19,340 and 21,107 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for serious injuries is zero in 2019. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injuries could continue to trend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance the downward trend in the number of serious injuries on Florida's roads. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injuries is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 21,107 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.

Fatality Rate 0.000

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 1.08 and 1.63 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current


Page 2 of 3

state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for fatality rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019. While the data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million VMT could continue to trend upward in 2018 and 2019, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the fatality rate per 100 million VMT. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for fatality rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 1.63 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 19,340 and 21,107 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for serious injuries is zero in 2019. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injuries could continue to trend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance the downward trend in the number of serious injuries on Florida's roads. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injuries is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 21,107 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.

Serious Injury Rate 0.000

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injury rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 7.789 and 10.846 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT could continue to trend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance the downward trend in the serious injury rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 10.846 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 0.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 3,117 and 3,801 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2019. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and


Page 3 of 3

serious injuries could continue to tend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 3,801 in order to satisfy the federal requirement.

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information. Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent throughout our Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Plan. Florida’s data forecasts have been established using an ARIMA Hybrid Regression Model (0, 1,1)(2,0,0)(12) with VMT. Nine independent variables were tested to assess correlations; only Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and gas consumption have relatively high correlations with fatalities and serious injuries and of these two variables only VMT was useful in predicting future fatalities and serious injuries. The first three performance measures (number of fatalities, number of serious injuries, and fatality rate per 100M VMT) have been forecasted based on a five year rolling average and the remaining performance measures will be forecasted annually. The forecasts for 2017 and 2018 are based on monthly data from 2005 through 2016 using statistical forecasting methodologies. Forecasts for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT and non-motorist fatal and serious injuries have been established using the AAA version of the Exponential Smoothing (ETS) algorithm. [Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan, 2018]




AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY



Item Number: 10a

Item Title: Local Incentive Program for Project Advancement (LIPPA)

Item Origination: Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)

UPWP Reference: Task 3.3 – Transportation Improvement Program

Requested Action: Discuss and provide comments to Staff

Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the continued development of the proposed LIPPA be discussed.


· Example Programs that Consider Local Funding in Project Prioritization Ø Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

Ø River-to-Sea TPO Ø Southern Nevada Regional Transportation Commission

· Transportation Improvement Program Funding Summary




MEMORANDUM


FROM: Peter Buchwald Executive Director


SUBJECT: Local Incentive Program for Project Advancement

(LIPPA)

BACKGROUND

At prior TPO Board meetings, Board members requested that the Board consider the recognition of TPO Priority Projects which received local funding

or are removed from the TPO’s List of Priority Projects (LOPP) because the

projects have been funded completely by the local agencies.

Because the allocation of local funding to TPO Priority Projects advances the construction of TPO Priority Projects and allows the TPO’s funding to be used

for additional Priority Projects, it appears to be appropriate to recognize and incentivize the allocation of local funding to TPO Priority Projects. Therefore,

the LIPPA is proposed to recognize the allocation of local funding and advance the construction of more TPO Priority Projects through incentives.

At its meeting on July 17th, the TAC reviewed the proposed LIPPA and

requested that the TAC be provided additional opportunity to review and provide comments prior to the consideration of the adoption of the LIPPA by

the TPO Board. The comments provided by the TAC included the suggestions of applying LIPPA only to the Transportation Alternatives (TA) List of Priority

Projects or revising the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Project

Prioritization Methodology to award points for the allocation of local funding to a project.

At its meeting on July 25th, the TPO Executive Committee reviewed the

proposed LIPPA, and consensus was obtained to recommend that the proposed LIPPA be further reviewed by the TAC and the Florida Department


of Transportation (FDOT) prior to its consideration of adoption by the TPO

Board.

At its meeting on August 1st, the TPO Board accepted the recommendations of the TAC and the Executive Committee and requested that the proposed

LIPPA be reviewed by FDOT and again by the TAC prior to further discussion by the Board. In addition, the Board provided comments pertaining to the

appropriate qualifications and criteria for projects receiving incentives, potential Environmental Justice issues, the establishment of timeframes for

the incentives, and developing a pilot program to implement LIPPA for smaller projects such as sidewalks.

At a workshop on August 24th, the TAC reviewed and discussed the

proposed LIPPA with representatives from FDOT. The discussion is summarized in the following Analysis.

ANALYSIS

At the workshop, after a lengthy discussion by the TAC and FDOT, the

following benefits and challenges with the implementation of the proposed LIPPA were identified:

Benefits 1) It would encourage Title VI investment.

2) It would encourage more local investment into TPO Priority Projects.

3) It would encourage more local investment into transit.

Challenges

1) The community needs do not change, and the ranking should be based on the needs.

2) An unintended result is that if a project is prioritized and the project is

not shovel ready when funded, the funding may be lost.

3) It may be difficult to score projects and track funding based on local funding when there are a variety of sources of local funding such as

impact fees, developer contributions, etc.

4) If the percentage of a general municipal budget contributed toward a project is used as a criteria as opposed to the gross amount of the


contribution, it may be difficult to calculate the percentage of the

general fund.

5) It may add to the debt of a local government.

6) There is the potential for a single local government to always have projects on top of the list.

7) The local governments implement differing policies and address

differing needs, such as rural infrastructure, and utilize different funding mechanisms, such as bonding.

8) The TPO is a regional agency and uses a holistic planning approach to

community transportation needs, and the results would be changed by adding money to the equation.

9) An uneven playing field may be created.

10) It may create instability to the FDOT Work Program if there is “leap frogging” of projects.

11) The conventional emphasis on need may not be continued.

12) Additional resources from the TPO may be required to perform annual

equity analyses.

13) The process could be manipulated in many ways.

14) Budgeting by the local government typically does not precede project prioritization and selection.

15) Grant money should be investigated before projects are budgeted.

16) Tiebreakers may be difficult to develop.

17) It may impact the National Environmental Policy Act process with regard to Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)/State TIP

consistency.

Based on the challenges far outnumbering the benefits of implementing the proposed LIPPA, consensus was obtained by the TAC to not recommend the

implementation of the proposed LIPPA.

At the Board Meeting on October 3rd, a summary of the progress of the development of the LIPPA to date was provided. In addition, an initial


summary of funding allocations from the TPO’s Transportation Improvement

Programs over the last 10 years, known as the TIP Funding Summary, was provided to the Board at the meeting. The TIP Funding Summary is intended

to evaluate the distribution of funding to the local governments. Because projects typically receive funding from a combination of sources, which

depend on whether the projects are located on or off the State System, and to consider jurisdictional boundaries and authorities, the TIP Funding

Summary is organized according to the following categories:

Ø Local System - St. Lucie County Jurisdiction Ø Local System - Fort Pierce Jurisdiction

Ø Local System - Port St. Lucie Jurisdiction Ø State System - St. Lucie County Jurisdiction

Ø State System - Fort Pierce Jurisdiction Ø State System - Port St. Lucie Jurisdiction

Ø State System - Multi-Jurisdictional

At the October 3rd meeting, the Board subsequently requested examples of

jurisdictions with similar programs, and consensus was obtained by the Board to postpone to the December Board meeting further discussion

regarding the proposed LIPPA.

Examples of programs that consider local funding in the project prioritization process were identified which are attached and include the following:

Ø Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency project prioritization

process for the Local Initiatives Program;

Ø River-to-Sea TPO (Volusia County) Priority Ranking Criteria for Local Initiatives Projects; and,

Ø Southern Nevada Regional Transportation Commission (Las Vegas) Project Rating Form for arterial roadway projects.

Subsequent to the October 3rd Board Meeting, the TIP Funding Summary

was refined to assist in the evaluation of the distribution of funding to the local governments. The latest version of the TIP Funding Summary is

attached which includes funding allocations over the last 10 years from past TIPs and 5 years into the future from the current TIP.

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the continued development of the proposed LIPPA be discussed and direction be provided to Staff.

2018 Local Initiatives (LI) Program Overview Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency

1

The purpose of the Palm Beach Transportation Planning Agency’s (TPA) Local Initiative (LI) Program is to help advance lower-cost, non-regionally significant transportation projects identified by our communities. Funding is available by Fiscal Year, starting July 1st of the previous calendar year.

FUNDING AVAILABILITY

Application Deadline: March 2, 2018

Total Available Funding: ~$20M/year

Grant Reimbursement Maximum: $5,000,000

Grant Reimbursement Minimum: $250,000

PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Eligible projects are as follows:

Complete Street projects – including:

Lane Narrowing Transit Infrastructure Turn Lanes Lane Elimination Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Traffic Signals Bicycle Facilities Median Modifications Striping and Marking Pedestrian Facilities Signing and lighting

Transit capital – Vehicle purchase and shelter construction. Can also pay up to 50% of a 3-year turn-key contract for new transit service (e.g. trolley service). Non-motorized infrastructure - Separated, buffered or designated bike lanes, sidewalks, shared-use paths, and pedestrian lighting. Freight efficiency - Airport or seaport off-site road capacity improvements, railway capacity improvements, truck movement improvements.

ELIGIBLE PROJECT SPONSORS

Municipalities

County

State

Federal agencies

Transit agencies

Tribal governments


2

PROGRAM GUIDELINES

An applicant may submit a maximum of two (2) applications but only the highest ranking

eligible project application will be included in the draft priority list. For the purpose of

these guidelines, Palm Beach County may submit a maximum of six (6) applications total.

If funding permits, a second round of projects may be added to the priority list.

An application must score a minimum of 25 out of 100 points in order to be eligible for

Board approval on the Project Priority List.

Applications are limited to a minimum request of $250K and maximum funding amount

of $5M, inclusive of all project phases.

Applications must be submitted online via the TPA website.

Applications to be submitted, reviewed and processed pursuant to the schedule.

Applications must include all required documents listed in the Submittal Checklist.

Applications will be scored and ranked via the scoring system derived from the goals,

objectives and values in the Directions 2040 LRTP and described more specifically in the

Scoring Criteria table.

The TPA Board makes the final decision regarding inclusion of an application on the TPA

Priority Projects List and may waive any of the above requirements.

http://www.palmbeachmpo.org/forms/


3

SCHEDULE

Date Activity and Deadline

December 15, 2017 Program Kick-off. PBTPA approves program. Staff distributes the procedure and application process information to Palm Beach agencies and posts to website.

December 19, 2017 Joint Applicant Workshop. FDOT and TPA staff to review application requirements, scoring criteria, and schedule and project implementation options.

December 19, 2017 thru February 23, 2018

TPA and/or FDOT Staff Consultation. Applicants are encouraged to schedule an appointment to speak with TPA and FDOT representatives to discuss project specifics and clarify application requirements. Project Reviews by Applicant. Prior to application submittal, project applicants are encouraged to have qualified staff conduct field reviews to ensure that potential projects are “constructible” and require no right-of way acquisition.

March 2, 2018 Applications Due to TPA. Completed applications to be submitted by project applicants via TPA website.

March 3 – March 16, 2018 TPA Application Screening. TPA staff will screen applications for completeness and then determine a pre-eligibility ranking for those projects that appear to be eligible and “constructible”.

March 19, 2018

TPA Submits Project List and Tentative Ranking to FDOT. TPAs submit applications and a summary list of candidate projects with tentative project rankings to the Program Management Office for project feasibility assessment and eligibility determination.

March 29 – April 13, 2018 Applicant Presentations TPA Staff. TPA staff will provide feedback and clarify project intent.

May 1, 2018 Resolution of Support Due to TPA. Project sponsors must submit their resolution to commit to funding of operations and maintenance of the project.

May 25, 2018 FDOT D4 returns Eligibility Determinations. TPA shares eligibility issues with applicants and creates draft priority ranking for eligible projects.

May 29 – July 2, 2018 Applicants to Resolve Outstanding Eligibility Issues.

July 11-12, 2018 Draft Priority List to Committees. Committees will be given opportunity to review draft priority ranking and provide input for TPA Board consideration.

July 19, 2018 Final Priority List to TPA Board. TPA Board approves final Priority Project List.

August 1, 2018 Submit Project Priorities to FDOT. The TPA submits an adopted list of finalized priority projects to the FDOT D4 Program Management Office and notifies sponsors of final priority rankings.


4

SCORING CRITERIA Highest Possible score is 100

LRTP Value

LRTP Category

Criteria Value Scoring Max

1 & 6

Safety, Security & Complete

Streets

*separated bicycle lanes -4 8

8

Project improves non-motorized safety by providing:

*buffered bike lanes - 4 8

*10'+ shared-use pathways - 3 6

*designated bike lanes - 2 4

*new sidewalks - 1 2 2

Project improves safety and/or convenience for non-motorized users (i.e. provide safe access to daily needs for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities)

5 5

Project improves performance of hurricane evacuation route 3 5

Project mitigates impacts of sea level rise 2

2 Maintenance

Project improves infrastructure in unacceptable condition with widespread advanced signs of deterioration; potential imminent failure

10

10 Project improves infrastructure in poor condition and mostly below standard, approaching the end of its service life, exhibiting significant deterioration and of strong risk of failure

7

3 TSM&O /

TDM

Non-capacity project implements TSM strategies 7

10

Non-capacity project implements TDM strategies 3

Capacity project improves congested Thoroughfare intersection(s) 5

Capacity project expands fiber optic traffic signal network 3

Capacity project expands CCTV camera coverage area on principal arterials 2

4 Maximize TPA

Funds

Local Implementation via Local Area Participation(LAP) Agreement or FTA Flex 5

5 FDOT Implementation on State Highway System with Local Funding for design 3

FDOT Implementation with Local Funding for design 1

Applicant cancels a previously prioritized and funded project within the past 12 months -5

5 Equity

Median Household income within 1 mile of project vs PBC median income ($53,363)

< 60% 10

10 60 - <80% 7

80% - <100% 3

Traditionally underserved population percentage within 1 mile of project (includes minority, limited English speaking, disability, transit dependent, seniors)

>80% 5

5

>60 - 80% 4

>40% -60% 3

>20% - 40% 2

5-20% 1

7a Local Support Project is endorsed by members of benefit area (HOA, POA, petition, etc.) 5

10 7b Environmental

Project will have positive environmental impacts (i.e. mitigation activity, pollution prevention & abatement, stormwater management, etc.)

5

8 Regional Freight

Project improves capacity on congested SIS facility/connector or non-SIS truck route

v/c > 1.2 5

5 v/c > 1.1 3

v/c > 1 1

Project improves efficient movement of freight in region 5 5

9 Non-

motorized Connectors

Project improves non-motorized facilities at an interchange, bridge, or railroad crossing 6

10 Project improves non-motorized connectivity by providing a direct link to facilities on PBC Thoroughfare Map within 2 miles of a transit hub

4

10 Efficient Transit

Project improves service at a transit hub 6 10

Project reduces transit travel time 4

*Multiply length (up to 2 miles) by factor shown in value column 100

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 – FY 202

2016 Priority Ranking Criteria For Traffic Operations, Safety, and Local Initiatives (traffic operations focused) Projects

Criteria Summary

Priority Criteria Points

(1) Location 5

(2) Project Readiness 15

(3) Mobility and Operational Benefits 30

(4) Safety Benefits 20

(5) Comprehensive Plan and Economic Benefits 10

(6) Infrastructure Impacts 20

(7) Local Matching Funds > 10% 10

Total 110

Criteria Definitions

(1) Location (5 points max)

This criterion looks at the classification of the roads that will benefit from a proposed project. This criterion gives more points to projectsthat provide a benefit on roads that are classified at a higher level. If a project benefits more than one road, the road that has the highestclassification will be used to allocate points.

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/22 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

- 234 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 234 -- 266 -- 266 -- 266 -- 266 -- 266 -- 266 -- 266 -- 267 - -268 --270-

271

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/2

Project located on a … Maximum Points

Non-Federal Functionally Classified Road

Sele

ct o

nly

on

e

0

Local Road (Federal Functional Classification) 0

Rural Minor Collector (Federal Functional Classification) 0

Urban Minor Collector Road (Federal Functional Classification) 2

0-Major Collector Road (Federal Functional Classification) 3

Minor Arterial Road (Federal Functional Classification) 4

Principal Arterial Road (Federal Functional Classification) 5

Subtotal 0 - 5

(2) Project Readiness (15 points max)

This criterion looks at the amount of work required to develop the project and get it ready for construction. The closer a project is to the construction phase, the more points it is eligible for.

Phasing Already Completed or Not Required 1

Completed Not

Required

Required But Not

Completed (no points)

Unknown or TBD

(no points)

Points

Feasibility Study/Conceptual Design/Cost Estimate/SEMP 2

Ch

eck

on

ly o

ne

in

each

ro

w

3

PE (Design) 3

Environmental 3

Right-of-Way Acquisition 3

Permitting 3

Subtotal 0 - 15

1 When Federal funding will be used to fund a project, all activities or work, including that which is done in advance of apply-ing for Federal funds, must comply with all applicable Federal statutes, rules and regulations.

2 A Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) is generally required for ITS projects.


- 235 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 235 -- 267 -- 267 -- 267 -- 267 -- 267 -- 267 -- 267 -- 268 - -269 --271-

272

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 – FY

(3) Mobility and Operational Benefits (30 points max)

This criterion looks at the extent of traffic operational benefits that will be derived from a proposed project. The number of points allocatedwill reflect the degree of benefit that is expected.

Mobility and Operational Benefits Points

Existing volume to capacity ratio (i.e., existing congestion severity) [Must be documented.]

Sele

ct o

nly

on

e

< 075 0

075 to 099 3

100 to 125 4

> 125 5

Mobility Enhancements (i.e., level of increased mobility that a project will provide)

Sele

ct a

ll th

at a

pp

ly - None 0

- Bike, Pedestrian or Transit 0 - 5

- Access Management, ITS, CriticalBridge, Intersection Improvement,

or Traffic Signal Retiming3 0 - 10

Approved signal warrant (new signals only), left turn phase warrant, left turn lane warrant, street light warrant or widening justification4, access management or ITS improvements5 Se

lect

on

ly

on

e

No 0

Yes 0 - 5

Hurricane evacuation route upgrade including, but not limited to, converting critical traffic signal to mast arm or other operational improvements6 Se

lect

on

ly o

ne No 0

Yes 0 - 5

Subtotal 0 - 30

3 Attach Traffic Signal Timing Study

4 Attach Warrant Study to application; otherwise VTPO staff will assume that a Warrant Study justifying the improvement has not been completed

5 Access management and ITS improvements include, but are not limited to, addition of non-traversable median greater than 50% project length, addition of curb/gutter at intersection or greater than 50% project length, closure of minor intersections or crossovers, reduction of the number of access points (driveways or driveway widths), elimination of existing at-grade RR crossing, elimination of existing on-street parking, provision of traffic signal preemption for emergency vehicles, connection of three or more traffic signals, and new connection of traffic signal system to computerized signal control

6The term “other operational improvements” includes any improvement that will likely result in a significant: a) increase in vehicular capacity or b) reduction in the probable occurrence or severity of traffic delay and/or disruption from signal failure, lane blockage, etc.


- 236 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 236 -- 268 -- 268 -- 268 -- 268 -- 268 -- 268 -- 268 -- 269 - -270 --272-

273

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 – FY 2021/

(4) Safety Benefits (20 points max)

This criterion looks at the degree of safety benefits that will be derived from a proposed project. The distinction between the categories of benefits will be coordinated with the Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTST). The number of points allocated will reflect the degree of benefit that is expected.

Safety Benefits 7 Points

The specific project location is on FDOT’s High Crash List or has otherwise been identified as having an overrepresentation of severe crashes? (Provide supporting documentation (e.g., intersection crashes per million entering vehicles8, corridor crashes per million vehicle miles2, Community Traffic Safety Team report, etc.)

Sele

ct a

ll th

at a

pp

ly

0 - 5

The “problem” described on page 1 of this application is a safety issue that falls within one or more of the eight Emphasis Areas identified in the 2012 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (ie, distracted driving, vulnerable road users, intersection crashes, lane departure crashes, aging road users and teen drivers, impaired driving, and traffic records) or does contribute to the ability of emergency response vehicles to effectively respond to an incident

0 - 5

The proposed project represents a strategy that is professionally recognized as being effective in reducing the frequency and/or severity of traffic accidents

0 - 10

Subtotal 0 - 20

7 If an application scores very high in this criterion, the R2CTPO may submit application to either the East or West Volusia Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) for

Safety Fund consideration. 8 Applicant must use the following crash rate calculation formulas: Corridor Crash Rate = (Number of Crashes x 1,000,000) / (AADT x 365 days/year x Number Years x

Segment Length); Intersection Crash Rate = (Number of Crashes x 1,000,000) / (AADT x 365 x Number of Years).


- 237 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 237 -- 269 -- 269 -- 269 -- 269 -- 269 -- 269 -- 269 -- 270 - -271 --273-

274

River to Sea TPO FY 2017/18 –

(5) Comprehensive Plan and Economic Development (10 points max)

This criterion looks at the degree to which the proposed project will contribute to the satisfaction of one or more of the local government’s adopted comprehensive plan goals or objectives, and the degree to which it supports economic development.

Comprehensive Plan Compliance and Economic Development Maximum Points

Directly contributes to the satisfaction of one or more goals/objectives in the adopted comprehensive plan

Sele

ct a

ll th

at

app

ly

0 - 5

Directly supports economic development (eg, supports community development in major development areas, supports business functionality, and/or supports creation or retention of employment opportunities)

0 - 5

Subtotal 0 - 10

(6) Infrastructure Impacts (20 points max)

This criterion looks at impacts to adjoining public or private infrastructure, which may be in the way of the project. The less existing infrastructure is impacted the more points a project will score.

Infrastructure Impacts Points

Major Drainage Impact - relocating or installing new curb inlets or other extensive drainage work is required, or drainage impact has not yet been determined9

Sele

ct

on

ly

0

Minor Drainage Impact - extending pipes, reconfiguring swales or other minor work is required

0 - 2

No Drainage Impact - no drainage work required 0 - 4

Relocation of private gas utility or fiber optic communication cable is not required2

Sele

ct a

ll th

at a

pp

ly 0 - 4

Relocation of public/private water or sewer utility is not required10 0 - 4

Relocation of telephone, power, cable TV utilities is not required11 0 - 4

No specimen or historic trees ≥ 18” diameter will be removed or destroyed 0 - 4

Subtotal 0 - 20

9 ADA pedestrian crossings at intersections may impact drainage significantly Attached Traffic Study should address drainage impacts.

10 Typically, these are underground utilities that can only be determined by a complete set of plans Attach plans showing no impacts; otherwise, assumption is in urban area utilities will be affected.

11 Typically, above ground utilities are not affected except for widening and turn lane projects.


- 238 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 238 -- 270 -- 270 -- 270 -- 270 -- 270 -- 270 -- 270 -- 271 - -272 --274-

275


(7) Local Matching Funds > 10% (10 points max)

If local matching funds greater than 10% of the estimated project cost are available, describe the local matching fund package in detail.

Local Matching Funds > 10% Points

Is a local matching fund package greater than 10% of the estimated project cost documented for the project?

10.0% < Local Matching Funds < 12.5% 1

12.5% ≤ Local Matching Funds < 15.0% 2








32.5% ≤ Local Matching Funds 10

Subtotal 0 - 10


- 239 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 239 -- 271 -- 271 -- 271 -- 271 -- 271 -- 271 -- 271 -- 272 - -273 --275-

276


2016 Priority Ranking Criteria For Bicycle/Pedestrian and B/P Local Initiatives (bicycle and pedestrian focused) Projects

Criteria Summary

Priority Criteria Maximum

Points

(1) Proximity to community assets 20

(2) Connectivity and Accessibility 20

(3) Safety/Security 20

(4) Contribution to "Livability" and Sustainability in the Community 10

(5) Enhancements to the Transportation System 10

(6) Project Readiness 5

(7) Public support/special considerations 5

(8) Local matching funds > 10% 10

(9) Value-Added Tie Breaker (if necessary) variable

Total (excluding Value-Added Tie Breaker) 100


- 240 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 240 -- 272 -- 272 -- 272 -- 272 -- 272 -- 272 -- 272 -- 273 - -274 --276-

277


Criteria Definitions

(1) Proximity to Community Assets (20 points max)

This measure will estimate the potential demand of bicyclists and pedestrians based on the number of productions or attractions the facilitymay serve within a one (1) mile radius for Shared Use Paths and Transportation Alternatives Activities or a ½ mile radius for Sidewalks Amaximum of 20 points will be assessed overall, and individual point assignments will be limited as listed below

Proximity to Community Assets Check All That Apply

Maximum Points

Residential developments, apartments, community housing 4

Activity centers, town centers, office parks, post office, city hall/government buildings, shopping plaza, malls, retail centers, trade/vocational schools, colleges, universities

4

Parks, trail facilities, recreational facilities 4

Medical/health facilities, nursing homes, assisted living, rehabilitation center 4

School bus stop (K-12) 2

Schools (K-12) 2

Maximum Point Assessment 20


- 241 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 241 -- 273 -- 273 -- 273 -- 273 -- 273 -- 273 -- 273 -- 274 - -275 --277-

278


(2) Connectivity and Accessibility (20 points max)

This measure considers the gaps that exist in the current network of bike lanes, bike paths and sidewalks. The measurement will assess points based on the ability of the proposed project to join disconnected networks or complete fragmented facilities. Does the project enhance mobility or accessibility for disadvantaged groups, including children, the elderly, the poor, those with limited transportation options and the disabled?

Network Connectivity and Accessibility Check All That Apply

Maximum Points

Project provides access to a transit facility 5

Project extends an existing bicycle/pedestrian facility (at one end of the facility) 5

Project provides a connection between two existing or planned/programmed bicycle/pedestrian facilities

5

Project has been identified as “needed” in an adopted document (ie a comprehensive plan, master plan, arterial study)

5


(3) Safety/Security (20 points max)

This measure provides additional weight to applications that have included safety as a component of the overall project and includes school locations identified as hazardous walking/biking zones and areas with significant numbers of safety concerns.

Safety/Security Check All That Apply

Maximum Points

The project is located in an area identified as a hazardous walk/bike zone by Volusia or Flagler County School District Student Transportation Services and within the River to Sea TPO planning area.

10

The project removes or reduces potential conflicts (bike/auto and ped/auto). There is a pattern of bike/ped crashes along the project route. The project eliminates or abates a hazardous, unsafe, or security condition in a school walk zone as documented in a school safety study or other relevant study.

10



- 242 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 242 -- 274 -- 274 -- 274 -- 274 -- 274 -- 274 -- 274 -- 275 - -276 --278-

279

River to Sea TPO

(4) Contribution to "Livability" and Sustainability in the Community (10 points max)

This measure considers how the project positively impacts the "Livability" and Sustainability in the community that is being served by that facility

Project includes traffic calming measures

Project is located in a “gateway” or entrance corridor as identified in a local government applicant’s master plan, or other approved planning document

Project removes barriers and/or bottlenecks for bicycle and/or pedestrian movements

Project includes features which improve the comfort, safety, security, enjoyment or well-being for bicyclists, pedestrians, and/or transit users

Project improves transfer between transportation modes

Project supports infill and redevelopment consistent with transit-oriented design principals and strategies are in place making it reasonably certain that such infill and redevelopment will occur

Project supports a comprehensive travel demand management strategy that will likely significantly advance one or more of the following objectives: 1) reduce average trip length, 2) reduce single occupancy motor vehicle trips, 3) increase transit and non-motorized trips, 4) reduce motorized vehicle parking, reduce personal injury and property damage resulting from vehicle crashes

Project significantly enhances the travel experience via walking and biking

(5) Enhancements to the Transportation System (10 points max)

This measure considers how the demonstrated and defensible relationship to surface transportation

Is the project included in an adopted plan?

Does the local government have Land Developement Code requirements to construct sidewalks?

Does the project relate to surface transportation?

Does the project improve mobility between two or more different land use types located within 1/2 mile of each other, including residential and employment, retail or recreational areas?

Does the project benefit transit riders by improving connectivity to existing or programmed pathways or transit facilities?

Does the project conform to Transit Oriented Development principles?

Is the project an extension or phased part of a larger redevelopment effort in the corridor/area?


- 243 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 243 -- 275 -- 275 -- 275 -- 275 -- 275 -- 275 -- 275 -- 276 - -277 --279-280


(6) Project “Readiness” (5 Points maximum)

This measure considers the state of project readiness Describe project readiness in the space provided

Is there an agreement and strategy for maintenance once the project is completed, identifying the responsible party?

Is the project completed through the design phase?

Is right-of-way readily available and documented for the project?

(7) Public Support/Special Considerations (5 Points maximum)

Describe whether the proposed facility has public support and provide documentation (eg, letters of support/signed petitions/public comments from community groups, homeowners associations, school administrators) Describe any special issues or concerns that are not being addressed by the other criteria

Special Considerations Check All That Apply

Maximum Points

Is documented public support provided for the project? Are there any special issues or concerns?

5


(8) Local Matching Funds > 10% (10 points max)

If local matching funds greater than 25% of the estimated project cost are available, describe the local matching fund package in detail

Local Matching Funds > 10% Check One Maximum Points

Is the Applicant committing to a local match greater than 10% of the estimated total project cost?

Yes No

10.0% < Local Matching Funds < 12.5% 1







- 244 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 244 -- 276 -- 276 -- 276 -- 276 -- 276 -- 276 -- 276 -- 277 - -278 --280-281

River to Sea TPO FY 2017




32.5% ≤ Local Matching Funds 10


(9) Value-Added Tie Breaker (if necessary) (variable points)

Projects with equal scores after evaluations using the five Project Proposal Criteria are subject to the Value-Added Tie Breaker The BPAC and Project Review Subcommittee are authorized to award tie breaker points based on the additional value added by the project A written explanation of the circumstances and amount of tie breaker points awarded for each project will be provided


- 245 -(Revised 6/8/17)

- 245 -- 277 -- 277 -- 277 -- 277 -- 277 -- 277 -- 277 -- 278 - -279 --281-282

Project Rating Form

Arterial Roadway Projects - Prescreen for Applicability

Criterion Measure Points Network of Interest Yes/No - If "No", Send to Alternate Funding Source

Evaluation Pre-Rating

Bottleneck Elimination Yes/No - If "Yes", Send Directly to Funding Pre-Rating

Safety Improvement Yes/No - If "Yes", Send Directly to Funding Pre-Rating

Arterial Roadway Projects - Prescreen for Capacity Criterion Measure Points Congestion Reduction Project will reduce congestion Mandatory

NEPA Compliance No obvious negative impacts per RTP Environmental Justice, natural or cultural resources, or air quality that can not be addressed.

Mandatory

Plan Consistency Consistent with adopted Regional Transportation Plan.

Mandatory

Alternates Considered Access management/Raised medians

Bus Pullout(s)

Demand Management

Demand management and operational improvements to parallel facilities

Intersection improvements, including signalization

Other:

If "No" to any of the above, one or more of these must be true:

Right-of-way not available and/or cannot be acquired at a reasonable cost.

Alternates have been implemented and roadway still congested.

Modeling shows that implementation of all feasible alternatives will not reduce congestion to an acceptable level; however TDM will continue and operational improvements will be implemented as part of the project.

Will alternates accomplish desired congestion reduction? Yes/No

If "No", consider SOV Improvement Pre-Rating

Arterial Roadway Projects - Rating

Criterion Measure Points System Continuity 2+ mode link 10

Removes system gap 5

Extends system 0

Project Readiness for Construction

Within one year 10

Three years 5

Four years or more 0

Bus Pullout(s) Bus pullouts are included in project. 10

Current Level of Service - Peak Periods

F 20

E 10

D 5 A/C 0

Current AADT >60,000 15 >20,000 <60,000 10

<20,000 5

Funding Participation by private and other governmental sources

>75 Percent 20

>50 Percent 15

>25 Percent 10

<25 Percent and >$100,000 5

Safety for all modes per mile > 9 crashes per MVMT 5 > 7 crashes per MVMT 4

> 5 crashes per MVMT 3



Arterial Roadway Projects Maximum Available Score 90

Benefit / Cost Criterion Measure Points (Subtotal points divided by cost in millions)

Greater than 15 15

Greater than 10 10

Greater than 5 8

Greater than 1 6

Greater than 0.5 4

Greater than 0.25 2

Benefit / Cost Maximum Available Score 15

Total Points (Maximum 105)

- 2 -

Limited Access Facility Projects - Prescreen for Applicability

Criterion Measure Points Network of Interest Yes/No - If "No", Send to Alternate Funding

Source Evaluation Pre-Rating

Bottleneck Elimination Yes/No - If "Yes", Send Directly to Funding Pre-Rating

Safety Improvement Yes/No - If "Yes", Send Directly to Funding Pre-Rating

Limited Access Facility Projects - Prescreen for Capacity Criterion Measure Points Congestion Reduction Project will reduce congestion Mandatory

NEPA Compliance No obvious negative impacts per RTP Environmental Justice, natural or cultural resources, or air quality that can not be addressed.

Mandatory

Plan Consistency Consistent with adopted Regional Transportation Plan

Mandatory

Alternates Considered - Yes/No

Auxiliary Lane(s)

HOV lane

Demand Management

Demand management and operational improvements to parallel facilities

Other:

If "No" to any of the above, one or more of these must be true:

Right-of-way not available and/or cannot be acquired at a reasonable cost.

Alternates have been implemented and roadway still congested.

Modeling shows that implementation of all feasible alternatives will not reduce congestion to an acceptable level; however TDM will continue and operational improvements will be implemented as part of the project.

Will alternates accomplish desired congestion reduction? Yes/No

If "No", consider SOV Improvement Pre-Rating

- 3 -

Limited Access Facility Projects (Freeway, Expressway, Super Arterial, Junior

Expressway) Criterion Measure Points System Continuity 2+ mode link 10

Removes system gap 5

Extends system 0

Project Readiness for Construction

Within one year 10

Three years 5

Four years or more 0

Current Level of Service - Peak Periods

F 30

E 20

D 10 A/C 0

Current AADT >100,000 25 >60,000 <100,000 20

<60,000 15

Funding Participation by private and other governmental sources

>75 Percent 20

>50 Percent 15

>25 Percent 10

<25 Percent and >$100,000 5

Safety for all modes per mile



> 5 crashes per MVMT 3 > 3 crashes per MVMT 2


Limited Access Facility Projects

Maximum Available Score 100

Benefit / Cost Criterion Measure Points (Subtotal points divided by cost in millions)

Greater than 15 15

Greater than 10 10 Greater than 5 8

Greater than 1 6

Greater than 0.5 4

Greater than 0.25 2

Benefit / Cost Maximum Available Score 15

Total Points (Maximum 115)

- 4 -

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Funding Summary 1 of 8

Project Description SIS Type of Work Fund Code Description Funding Phase Responsible Agency Total Local Funding Total Funding

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 420,000

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 916,320

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (CM) Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 8,073

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA) Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,319,475

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT CONGESTION MITIGATION - AQ Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,038,404

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 21,901,333

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,477,327

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT EQUITY BONUS Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,274,546

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 875,355

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT EQUITY BONUS Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 150,936

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 396,697

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA) Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 166,663

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU) Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 213,998

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT EQUITY BONUS Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 818,043

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 18,374,540

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 12,655,967

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS Federal Earmark PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,439,840

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 258,998

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 150,000

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM S. 25TH STREET/SR-615 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 246,722 246,722

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM US-1 TO S. 25TH ST/CR-615 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal Earmark P D & E NOT AVAILABLE - 655,803

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA) Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 243,780

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,215,238

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,490,945

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 35,000

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 13,000

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 137,827

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 579,964

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS Federal Earmark RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 31,680

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT REPURPOSED FEDERAL EARMARKS Federal Earmark RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 107,857

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING Local P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT 1,650,925 1,650,925

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING Local PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT 2,258,000 2,258,000

OLEANDER AVENUE FROM MIDWAY ROAD TO SOUTH MARKET AVENUE No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,207,125

OLEANDER AVENUE FROM MIDWAY ROAD TO SOUTH MARKET AVENUE No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 389,185

OLEANDER AVENUE FROM MIDWAY ROAD TO SOUTH MARKET AVENUE No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 308,274

OLEANDER AVENUE FROM MIDWAY ROAD TO SOUTH MARKET AVENUE No SIDEWALK LOCAL FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 236,203 236,203

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD - RESERVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,000,000

W. MIDWAY RD/CR-712 FROM GLADES CUT OFF ROAD TO SELVITZ ROAD - RESERVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,000,000

CR-603/CR-607 ANGLE FROM ORANGE AVE (FL 68) TO NORTH 53RD No SIDEWALK & SIGNALIZATION LAR, ACSE Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 1,060,000 1,460,000

JUANITA AVENUE OVER TAYLOR CREEK FROM 15th St to 13th St. No REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE LF, LFR Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 1,734,365 2,889,447

WALTON ROAD SIDEWALK FROM VILLAGE GREEN TO LENNARD ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DDRF, LFF, XU Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 294,360 3,258,000

WALTON ROAD FROM VILLAGE GREEN TO LENNARD ROAD No LANDSCAPING LF, SE Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 570,000 1,000,000

ST. JAMES DRIVE FROM OXBOW TO RIVERS EDGE ELEM. No BIKE LANE / SIDEWALK LF. SE Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 120,000 321,000

WEATHERBEE ROAD FROM US-1 TO MIDWAY ROAD No SIDEWALK SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 1,252,200

Total 8,170,575 94,844,690

Project Description SIS Type of Work Fund Code Description Funding Phase Responsible Agency Local Funding Total Funding

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING NAT HWY PERFORM - RESURFACING Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 2,495,285

HAVANA AVENUE FROM KAUFMAN AVENUE TO SOUTH 13TH STREET No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE 16,150 355,610

31ST STREET FROM OKEECHOBEE ROAD TO TENNESSEE AVENUE No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 393,563

CR-68/ORANGE AVENUE Graves to Kings No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 395,563

CR-68/ORANGE AVENUE FROM WEST OF I-95 TO 4.5 MILES (WEST) SAFETY PROJECT No SIDEWALK HIGH RISK RURAL RODES State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 3,231,000

14TH STREET BRIDGE OVER MOORE’S CREEK No SIDEWALK LOCAL FUNDS, FEDERAL ECONOMIC STIMULAS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE 440,000 1,136,000

OLEANDER AVENUE/SUNRISE OHIO AVE TO VIRGINIA AVE BIKE LANES & SIDEWALKS No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 575,000

13th Street (Phase II) ORANGE AVE TO 400' SOUTH OF AVE D No SIDEWALK AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 1,469,955

25th STREET FROM ORANGE AVENUE TO AVENUE Q No SIDEWALK STATE IN HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 2,430,861

29TH STREET, Orange Ave to Avenue Q No SIDEWALK AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 384,491

Local System-St. Lucie County Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023

Local System-Fort Pierce Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023


GARDEN AVENUE FROM OLEANDER TO MAYFLOWER CANAL No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 438,314

SUNRISE BOULEVARD AND OLEANDER AVENUE, Ohio St to Virginia Ave No SIDEWALK AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 278,000

13TH ST VIRGINIA TO AVE Q No SIDEWALK AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 678,848

Total 456,150 14,262,490


CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 343,612

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal LOCAL ADVANCE REIMBURSE MANAGED BY FDOT - 942,857

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION EQUITY BONUS Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,000

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION EQUITY BONUS SUPPLEMENTING BDG Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 3,500,000

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,900,027

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION STP, BRIDGES Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 6,206,344

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,308,005

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,908

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE - 46,199,182

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 78,764

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% LOCAL ADVANCE REIMBURSE MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,138,435

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% LOCAL ADVANCE REIMBURSE MANAGED BY FDOT - 157,143

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 179,054

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 258,404

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,933,697

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR CIGP State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 123,115

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 37

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,407,298

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 7,114

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE - 22,694,133

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,000,000

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT 4,196,022 4,196,022

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LOCAL FUNDS Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 38,370 38,370

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 810,615 810,615

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LOCAL FUNDS Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 1,130,926 1,130,926

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LOCAL FUNDS Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 423,270 423,270

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE 9,500,000 9,500,000

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE 18,838,022 18,838,022

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS Federal Earmark RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,159,761

CROSSTOWN PARKWAY FROM MANTH LANE TO SR-5/US-1 No NEW BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal Earmark CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE - 243,780

PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM BECKER ROAD TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,002,908

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 186,196

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SA) Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 667,536

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT EQUITY BONUS Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 8,583

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,592,721

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 402,324

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU) Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 16,026

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 331,577

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,330,049

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD - RESERVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT 2015 SB2514A-TRAN REG INCT PRG State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 4,750,115 4,750,115

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM PAAR DRIVE TO DARWIN BLVD - RESERVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,623,709

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM BECKER ROAD TO PAAR DRIVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,010,000

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM BECKER ROAD TO PAAR DRIVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,657,773

PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD FROM BECKER ROAD TO PAAR DRIVE No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 50,000

PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM DARWIN BLVD TO GATLIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 1,006,345 1,006,345

PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM DARWIN BLVD TO GATLIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT 2015 SB2514A-TRAN REG INCT PRG State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 1,323,655 1,323,655

PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM DARWIN BLVD TO GATLIN BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 2,330,000 2,330,000

PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FROM DARWIN BLVD TO GATLIN BLVD No SIDEWALK SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL, EQUITY BONUS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 789,539

PORT ST. LUCIE BOULEVARD, GRECO TO SANSOME No SIDEWALK SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL, EQUITY BONUS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 2,330,000 6,990,000

SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE FROM BAYSHORE BLVD TO PETUNIA AVE LANDSCAPING No LANDSCAPING LF, SE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 100,000 1,097,788

SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD @ FLORESTA DR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS Local P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT 125,000 125,000

PAAR DRIVE FROM SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD TO SW DARWIN BLVD No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,112

PAAR DRIVE FROM SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD TO SW DARWIN BLVD No SIDEWALK ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALU Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 309,359

PAAR DRIVE FROM SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD TO SW DARWIN BLVD No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 74,825

Local System-Port St. Lucie Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023


PAAR DRIVE FROM SW PORT ST LUCIE BLVD TO SW DARWIN BLVD No SIDEWALK HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS Federal Earmark CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 130,840

PAAR DRIVE FROM SW PORT ST.LUCIE BLVD TO SW DARWIN BLVD No SIDEWALK TALU, TALT,LFP, TALU Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 130,840 520,024

NORTH MACEDO BLVD FROM SELVITZ RD TO ST JAMES DR No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 343,309

NORTH MACEDO BLVD FROM SELVITZ RD TO ST JAMES DR No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 298,437

NORTH MACEDO BLVD FROM SELVITZ RD TO ST JAMES DR No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 152,683 157,683

NORTH MACEDO BLVD FROM SELVITZ RD TO ST JAMES DR No SIDEWALK LOCAL FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 1,024,926 1,897,169

MELALEUCA BLVD-PH 1 FROM CAMDEN STREET TO BERKSHIRE BOULEVARD No SIDEWALK SE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 385,420

MELALEUCA BLVD-PH 2 FROM BERKSHIRE BLVD TO GREEN RIVER PARKWAY No SIDEWALK SE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 421,120

MALEALEUCA BLVD-PH 3 FROM LENNARD ROAD TO CAMDEN STREET No SIDEWALK SE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 313,874

SAVONA BOULEVARD FROM GATLIN BLVD TO NORTH OF THE C-24 No SIDEWALK SRTS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 1,652,460

SAVONA BLVDFROM BECKER TO GATLIN No SIDEWALK SR2E, EB State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 1,796,446

DEL RIO BLVD FROM PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD TO CALIFORNIA BLVD No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 992,274

DEL RIO BOULEVARD FROM PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD TO CALIFORNIA No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 992,274

DEL RIO BLVD FROM PSL TO CALIFORNIA No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 992,274

WESTMORELAND BLVD. FROM MORNINGSIDE BLVD TO LENNARD ROAD No SIDEWALK LF, CIGP State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 71,243 142,486

WESTMORLAND BLVD FROM BAKERSFIELD TO CAMBRIDGE No SIDEWALK AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 4,278,080

WESTMORLAND BLVD FROM BAKERSFIELD TO CAMBRIDGE No ROAD RECONSTRUCTION AMERICAN RECOVERY REINVESTMENT ACT Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 1,754,012

TULIP BLVD. FROM COLLEGE PARK RD. TO CHERRY HILL RD. No SIDEWALK TALT,SA,TALU, LF Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 196,394 847,311

SELVITZ ROAD FROM BAYSHORE TO MACEDO No SIDEWALK SA, LFP, TALU Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 58,265 407,249

BAYSHORE/SELVITZ RD FROM PRIMA VISTA BLVD TO SELVITZ ROAD No SIDEWALK EB, SU Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 78,000 633,266

CAMEO BLVD SW PORT ST.LUCIE BLVD CROSSTOWN PARKWAY No SIDEWALK TALT, LF Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE 209,553 969,353

CASHMERE BOULEVARD FROM SW DEL RIO BLVD North of Centennial High School No SIDEWALK TRANSPORTATION ALTS- >200K State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 328,970

DARWIN BLVD FROM SW PAAR DRIVE TO SW BECKER ROAD No SIDEWALK SRTS, EB State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 965,400

MARIPOSA ELEMENTARY No SIDEWALK SRTS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 468,214

MARION AVE FROM BAYSHORE BLVD TO CURTIS STREET No SIDEWALK SR2E, SRTS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 628,000

CALIFORNIA FROM FAIRWAY ISLES TO HEATHERWOOD No SIDEWALK FEDERAL ECONOMIC STIMULAS FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 150,000

Total 48,824,244 184,882,980



ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 319,759

ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 264,260

ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 203,662

ST.LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 79,116

ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 450,510

ST LUCIE COUNTY JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 351,554

SR-713/KINGS HWY SR70 AT TURNPIKE US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 6,113

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Federal CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 64,706

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (SU) Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 3,757,150

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION TALT Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 82,921

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 8,513,486

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,105,804

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TRANSPORTATION ALTS- ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 22,402

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM 800' SOUTH OF SR-70 TO N. OF I-95 OVERPASS Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT 1,264,578 1,264,578

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM SR-70 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT 1,116,370 1,116,370

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT LOCAL FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 187,669 187,669

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM 800' SOUTH OF SR-70 TO N. OF I-95 OVERPASS Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,150,846

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM 800' SOUTH OF SR-70 TO N. OF I-95 OVERPASS Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 37,640

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM SR-70 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 114,477

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM SR-70 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 631

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM SR-70 TO SR-5/US-1 No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,116,370

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 11,364,508

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 538,698

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 9,292,326

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 710,704

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 667,592

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 32,539

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,790,156

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 335,294

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 645,769

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 93,523

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,898,664

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR 500' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS ROAD Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,165,351

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,546,846

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 234,710

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,751,735

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 387,124

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,248,418

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 28,200

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 19,495,056

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 203,749

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,573

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR SOUTH OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No LANDSCAPING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 126,500

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR SOUTH OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No LANDSCAPING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR 800' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 346,903

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR 800' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,835,613

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR 800' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 9,991

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR 800' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,802

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 866,437

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,000,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 6,896,136

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 212,180

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,962,745

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 17,976,644

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 396,144

SR-713/KINGS HWY FR N OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS TO N OF COMMERCIAL CIR No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 60,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 433,003

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,000,000

State System-St. Lucie County Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023


SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 9,630,768

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 133,673

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,315,758

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 180,643

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF COMMERCIAL CIRCLE TO ST LUCIE BLVD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 75,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM ST LUCIE BOULEVARD TO SOUTH OF INDRIO ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,500,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM ST LUCIE BOULEVARD TO SOUTH OF INDRIO ROAD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 52,029

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,062,890

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) GROWTH MANAGEMENT FOR CIGP State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 76,390

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 67,680

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,063,600

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 145,061

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY - 8,955,401

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) LOCAL FUNDS Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 1,177,191 1,177,191

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) LOCAL FUNDS FOR PARTICIPATING Local RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT 3,463,647 3,463,647

SR-713 @ SR-614 No ADD TURN LANE(S) TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY ST LUCIE COUNTY 8,613,743 8,613,743

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No LANDSCAPING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,000

SR-713/KINGS HWY FROM NORTH OF PICOS RD TO NORTH OF SR-9/I-95 OVERPASS No LANDSCAPING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 100,000

SR-713/KING'S HWY FR 800' S OF SR-70 TO NORTH OF PICOS RD No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Toll/Turnpike PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,106

OKEECHOBEE ROAD / SR-70 FROM 900' W OF JENKINS RD TO 2700' E OF JENKINS RD Yes ADD LANES & REHAB PVMT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 11,526,920

25 STREET / SR-615 FROM ST LUCIE BOULEVARD TO US 1 No SIDEWALK & RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 11,768,256

SR-70/OKEECHOBEE RD/VIRGINIA AVE FROM JENKINS ROAD TO SR-5/US1 Yes RESURFACING STATE IN HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,750,000

SR-70/OKEECHOBEE RD FROM KINGS HIGHWAY TO CROSSROADS PARKWAY Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT NATIONAL HIGHWAY ADVANCED CST State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 11,906,212

SR-A1A/OCEAN DRIVE No ROAD SLOPE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,685,782

SR-607/EMERSON AVE FROM COUNTY LINE SOUTH No SIDEWALK LOCAL FUNDS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 307,800 500,000

SR70 OKEECHOBEE ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT Yes LANDSCAPING LOCAL FUNDS Local CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT 40,000 40,000

SR-A1A/ATLANTIC BEACH FROM OCEAN HARBOUR DR TO SLC/IRC COUNTY LINE No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,101,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 20,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 230,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 44,681

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,085,803

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 30,000

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,051,541

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 52,469

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 316,000

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,383,625

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 100,000

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 58,623

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE BRIDGE REPAIR & REHAB State 100% CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 300,000

I-95 BRIDGE DECK REPLACEMENT OVER CR-709 & FEC RR & OVER 10 MILE CREEK Yes BRIDGE REHABILITATION STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 250

A1A RESURFACING FROM ATLANTIC BEACH TO IRC LINE No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,200,000

A1A RESURFACING FROM OCEAN DRIVE TO MC LINE No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,381,233

BRIDGE 940031 McCARTY ROAD No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,330,458

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 20,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 230,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 44,681

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,085,803

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT MIDWAY RD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 30,000

SR 70 OKEECHOBEE ROAD FROM SLC LINE TO MILE POST 5.86 Yes ADD LANES REHABILITATE PVMT NATIONAL HIGHWAY SAFETY Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 91,623,114

SR 70 OKEECHOBEE ROAD FROM MILE POST 5.86 TO MILE POST 10.216 Yes ADD LANES REHABILITATE PVMT NATIONAL HIGHWAY SAFETY Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 59,167,721

SR-614/INDRIO RD FROM W. OF I-95 TO SR-713/KINGS HWY No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 209,769

SR-614/INDRIO RD FROM SR-607/EMERSON TO SR-713/KINGS HWY No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,308

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY PE CONSULTANTS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 650

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT CONGESTION MITIGATION - AQ Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 41,962,946

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT EQUITY BONUS Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 773,086

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, ANY AREA Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 457,381

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,643,964

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,529,476

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT IM, BRDG REPL, NATNL HWY-MAP21 Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 11,319,590

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION NHPP Federal MISCELLANEOUS MANAGED BY FDOT - 115,741

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 240,997

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 628,033


SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 117,104

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 479,809

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 229,606

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 140,570

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,966

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 34,619

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 444,194

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 152,405

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 23,482

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,661,011

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,975,352

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 203,352

SR-614/INDRIO ROAD FROM WEST OF SR-9/I-95 TO EAST OF SR-607/EMERSON AV No ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 126,481

Total 16,170,998 500,016,301


CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 147,541

CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 208,321

CITY/ PORT ST.LUCIE JPS SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE - 103,013

CITY OF PORT ST.LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINT & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE - 27,946

CITY OF PORT ST.LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINT & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 220,774

CITY OF PORT ST.LUCIE JPA SIGNAL MAINT & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE - 272,225

SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD @ FLORESTA DR No TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDY COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 125,000

SR-9/I-95 @ BECKER ROAD INTERCHANGE Yes LANDSCAPING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 120,000

SR-9/I-95 @ BECKER ROAD INTERCHANGE Yes LANDSCAPING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,000

SR-9/I-95 @ BECKER ROAD INTERCHANGE Yes LANDSCAPING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 738,906

SR-9/I-95 @ BECKER ROAD INTERCHANGE Yes LANDSCAPING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,550

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES ST. - S/W INTER/INTRASTATE HWY State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 405,436

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 20,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 25,000

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 127,510

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 3,068,940

SR-9/I-95 NORTHBOUND AND SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMPS AT GATLIN BLVD. Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 20,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,184,021

SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD @ FLORESTA DR No ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) LOCAL FUNDS Local P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT 125,000 125,000

SR-716/PORT ST LUCIE BLVD @ FLORESTA DR No ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,000

Total 125,000 6,980,183

Project Description SIS Type of Work Fund Code Description Funding Phase Group Responsible Agency Local Funding Total Funding

CITY OF FT. PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 566,965

CITY OF FT. PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 304,984

CITY OF FT.PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON SHS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 306,703

CITY OF FT.PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 83,367

CITY OF FT.PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 718,000

CITY OF FT.PIERCE JPA SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ON STATE HWY SYS No TRAFFIC SIGNALS STATEWIDE ITS - STATE 100%. State 100% OPERATIONS MANAGED BY CITY OF FORT PIERCE - 386,566

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,036,124

US 1 FROM S. OF EMIL ROAD TO TAYLOR CREEK BRIDGE Yes RESURFACING EQUITY BONUS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,926,000

US 1 FROM S. OF EMIL ROAD TO TAYLOR CREEK BRIDGE Yes RESURFACING HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 489,250

SR-5/US-1 FROM EDWARDS ROAD TO SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE No DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM EDWARDS ROAD TO SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE No DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 403,321

SR-5/US-1 FROM EDWARDS ROAD TO SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE No DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 239,372

SR-5/US-1 FROM EDWARDS ROAD TO SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE No DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,849,377

OUTFALL FOR SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,000

OUTFALL FOR SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 341,000

OUTFALL FOR SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 105,141

State System-City of Port St. Lucie Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023

State System-City of Fort Pierce Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023


OUTFALL FOR SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,402,061

SR-A1A/OCEAN DRIVE FROM S FT PIERCE CITY LIM TO SR-5 Resurface No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 8,957,918

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 696,543

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 151,404

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 123,223

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 54,726

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 907,374

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 30,710

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 75,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 75,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM N. OF MIDWAY RD TO EDWARDS RD No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,777,399

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 182,231

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 19,405

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 169,479

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 56,680

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,884,262

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 100,000

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 927,958

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 30,430

SR-5/US-1 @ SR-70/VIRGINIA AVENUE Yes ADD RIGHT TURN LANE(S) DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 40,000

Total - 29,437,973

Project Description SIS Type of Work Fund Code Description Funding Phase Responsible Agency Developer Funding Total Funding

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 161,594

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 16,739

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 204,453

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 35,000

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 33,000

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% DESIGN BUILD MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,925,883

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% DESIGN BUILD MANAGED BY FDOT - 52,750

ST. LUCIE COUNTY ATMS Yes ATMS - ARTERIAL TRAFFIC MGMT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% DESIGN BUILD MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,787,491

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 15,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,184,021

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 3,397,703

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 10,550

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,441,694

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 40,000

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 78,313

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 81,548

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 747,869

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT 3,099,999 3,149,999

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 7,762,131

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 127,119

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES TRANS REGIONAL INCENTIVE PROGM State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,170,339

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES 2015 SB2514A-TRAN REG INCT PRG State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 581,065

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONTRACT INCENTIVES MANAGED BY FDOT - 150,000

SR-9/I-95 AT ST LUCIE WEST BLVD Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 50,000

I-95/SR-9 FROM N OF BECKER ROAD TO S OF SR-70 Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 119,963

I-95/SR-9 FROM N OF BECKER ROAD TO S OF SR-70 Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,314

I-95/SR-9 FROM N OF BECKER ROAD TO S OF SR-70 Yes INTERCHANGE - ADD LANES TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,453,647

I-95/SR-9 FROM N. OF GLADES C/O RD TO S. OF SR-70 Yes ADD LANES & RECONSTRUCT TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 14,526

I-95 FROM MARTIN/ST. LUCIE COUNTY LINE TO SR-70 Yes PD&E/EMO STUDY TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,660,000

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT) Federal RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 19,103,446

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT) Federal RAILROAD & UTILITIES MANAGED BY FDOT - 450,000

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT) Federal ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 525,000

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT EQUITY BONUS Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,145,138

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STP, ANY AREA Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 110,223

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STP, BRIDGES Federal P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,021,953

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION (BRT) Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 4,500,034

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT NATIONAL HIGWAYS BRIDGES Federal PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 499,966

State System-Multi-Jurisdictional Limits FY2008 - FY2023


SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AMENDMENT 4 BONDS (BRIDGES) R/W & Bridge Bond RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 2,105,527

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AMENDMENT 4 BONDS (BRIDGES) R/W & Bridge Bond CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 51,125,657

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 26,715

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 950,074

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE-REPAIR/REHABILITATION TOTAL OUTSIDE YEARS State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 5,112

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 115,377

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 69,942

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 536,066

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 137,312

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% RIGHT OF WAY MANAGED BY FDOT - 1,142,717

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT DISTRICT DEDICATED REVENUE State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 20,333,244

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE IN-HOUSE PRODUCT SUPPORT State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 355,353

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 129,720

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGED BY FDOT - 250

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% P D & E MANAGED BY FDOT - 123,709

SR-A1A NORTH BRIDGE OVER ICWW BRIDGE #940045 No BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STATE PRIMARY HIGHWAYS & PTO State 100% PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING MANAGED BY FDOT - 200,000

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STP, ANY AREA Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 52,750

SR-5/US-1 FROM S. OF PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD. TO NE RIOMAR DRIVE No RESURFACING STP, URBAN AREAS > 200K Federal CONSTRUCTION MANAGED BY FDOT - 93,309

Total 3,099,999 146,313,305

Documents

REGULAR BOARD MEETING - St Lucie TPOCouncilwoman Morgan rema rked that Mr. Ribaric had presented several more alternatives than had been included within the agenda packet and requested