Registered IBS System Registered IBS System Provider: A strategy for Provider: A strategy for

value creationvalue creation

Malaysia IBS International Exhibition 2011CIDB Convention Centre, Kuala Lumpur

Kamaluddin bin Haji Abdul RashidSpecialised Services DivisionCivil, Structural and Bridge Engineering BranchJKR Malaysia 5 April 2011

Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline

IntroductionCreating valuesUnderlying principlesJKR initiatives Conclusion

Economic Transformation Programme

Entry Point Projects (EPP)

Selected for ability grow the economy

Merit of maximising GNI per ringgit

expenditure

Private sector driven

Two-year rolling plan

Objectives of IBS implementation

Increase quality

Increase productivity

Reduce construction period

Reduce foreign labour

Standardisation of designs

Floor slab spans on the shorter length (cast in-situ concept)

5 000

7 000

Floor slab spans on the longer length (precast concept)

5 000

14 000

Implementation approaches

Contractor to proposed the IBS

design after tender was awarded

Costs more

Contractor to procure from single approved

IBS Supplier

Contractor to substitute conventional with IBS

design after tender was awarded

Costs more or at par

Price competitive but longer

construction period

Alternative IBS design submitted by

bidders at tender stage

Appointed consultant required to proposed

IBS schemes

IBS components designed by in-house designers

Cheaper when

substituted

Observations

Construction costs are lower if the manufacturers are allowed to propose the design of the components themselves, that best suited to their manufacturing capabilities.

Registration of manufacturers is necessary to reduce evaluation work during the Tender Evaluation stage.

Observations

When re-usable system formwork is specified, the quality of work are well below expectation.

Bidders often quoting price of new rather than used re-useable system formwork making the cost of structures expensive.

Precast Concrete Frame, Panel and Box System Formwork Steel FramePrefabricated Timber FrameBlockwork

Industrialised Building Systems

Leverage on manufacturingCompetitive designsContinuous design improvementsFocus on quality

Underlying principles

Shorter times

Establish a list of building component manufacturer sContractor to select manufacturer of their choice at tender stage

Approach

Making improvements to in-efficient designs imperative

Having multiple design proposals for each building type

Requirements

Registered IBS System Providers

OutcomesInsist on competition in designs

How

Drive for continuous design improvement

Leverage on manufacturing

Aim

Lower costs

Create conditions for concurrent work to occur

Manufacturer’s work is independent of the contractor’s

Manufacturers to propose the structural framing using their own products

Making construction compatible with manufacturing

Focus on higher quality

Lower labour demand

Better product

Leverage on manufacturing

Create conditions where sub-standard work easy to reject

Inspection at manufacturer’s prior to installation

Conclusions

JKR is to allow manufacturers to submit their own design proposals to enable the construction costs kept at the minimum.

JKR is introduce procedures that exclude the adoption of re-useable system formwork in the construction.

JKR is to evaluate technical submissions from the manufacturer before tender is invited and lists the complying submissions into a register to be called RISP.

Thank you