22
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Polic Brno, 30 September 2010

REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future

Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional PolicyBrno, 30 September 2010

Page 2: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Some facts about cities

The majority of Europeans live in cities (73%)

Only 7% live in metropolis with over 5 mio. Inhabitants.

Medium-sized cities and small towns are charactistic for Europe’s settlement structure - regional or sub-regional centres play important roles.

Over 60% live in around 1.000 medium-sized cities with over 50.000 inhabitants.

Over 85% of the EU's GDP is generated in urban areas, which act as drivers of regional or national economies.

Social exclusion and polarisation is a predominantly urban phenomenon.

Page 3: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Page 4: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Page 5: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

What is at stake for cohesion policy?

Meeting our objectives in terms of...

• Social inclusion (inner-city disparities, disadvantaged neighbourhoods)

• Economic competitiveness (economic growth poles, knowledge economy and innovation capacities)

• Territorial cohesion (polycentric development, linkages between agglomerations and their hinterland, urban sprawl)

Page 6: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Economic competitiveness

Page 7: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Berlin: Neighbourhood Unemployment Rate, 2001Neighbourhood Unemployment in Germany, Belgium and France 1999-2001

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

München

Bonn

Main

zK

arlsru

he

Darm

sta

dt

Fra

nkfu

rt a

m M

ain

Fre

iburg

im

Bre

isgau

Wie

sbaden

Mülh

eim

a.d

. R

uhr

Regensburg

Düsseld

orf

Wuppert

al

Mönchengla

dbach

Köln

Trier

Ham

burg

Nürn

berg

Essen

Bie

lefe

ldB

ochum

Bre

men

Hannover

Dort

mund

Gött

ingen

Dre

sden

Weim

ar

Berlin

Erf

urt

Schw

erin

Leip

zig

Fra

nkfu

rt a

n d

er

Oder

Magdeburg

Halle a

n d

er

Saale

Bru

gge

Gent

Antw

erp

en

Bru

xelles /

Bru

ssel

Liè

ge

Charlero

i

Bolo

gna

Vero

na

Venezia

Milano

Firenze

Trieste

Torino

Genova

Rom

aB

ari

Cagliari

Tara

nto

Reggio

di C

ala

bria

Cata

nia

Pale

rmo

Napoli

Orléans

Rennes

Str

asbourg

Lim

oges

Cle

rmont-

Ferr

and

Dijon

Poitie

rsB

esançon

Nancy

Lyon

La v

ille

de P

aris

Metz

Nante

sG

renoble

Sain

t-E

tienne

Reim

sN

ice

Caen

Aja

ccio

Bord

eaux

Lille

Rouen

Toulo

use

Am

iens

Le H

avre

Montp

ellie

rM

ars

eille

Un

em

plo

ym

en

t R

ate

in

%

Highest neighbourhood unemployment rateCity unemployment rateLowest neighbourhood unemployment rate

GERMANY

BELGIUMFRANCE

Source: Urban Audit

ITALY

Page 8: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Multi-fold European targets...

• Keeping and developing a well-balanced, poly-centric urban structures and strengthening the links to the surrounding territory

• Using and fostering the cities’ potential for economic growth and job creation at regional, national and EU level – Improving the cities’ attractiveness for investment

• Achieving environmentally sustainable urban systems (“green cities”) and promoting the “Compact City”

Page 9: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

• Combatting social exclusion and economic deprivation within cities

• Enhancing networking and mutual learning between cities (Co-operation)

• Valorising cultural heritage and strengthening historic town centres (“The European City”)

• Integration of different objectives?

Multi-fold European targets...

Page 10: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

What have we done for urban development up to 2007?

• Starting points: “Innovative actions” and Community Initiatives– 1989-1994 Urban Pilot-Projects Phase I– 1994-1999 URBAN Community Initiative – 1997-1999 Urban Pilot-Projects Phase II– 2000-2006 URBAN II Community Initiative

• Focus on inner-city disparities, disadvantaged neighbourhoods and social inclusion – area-based approach

• Common “methodology”: Integrated (cross-sectoral) urban development – URBAN Acquis

Page 11: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

QualificationEducation

Good governanceParticipation

Exchange ofexperience Networking

Financing urban renewal

EnvironmentalIssues

Urban Mobility

Social inclusion

Economic development

Urban PlanningPhysical

regeneration

URBANAcquis

Programme (Management)Integrated urban development plan

The concept of integrated urban development

Page 12: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Lessons learnt

• Integrated urban development works as an approach– Different “sectoral” measures combined in a target area maximise

the impact (no “single projects”)– Suitable in- and outside deprived neighbourhoods and in different

types of cities (small towns – neighbourhoods in big cities)

• Relatively small financial incentives lead to a “leverage effect” – Mobilisation of private and further public investment – One pot of money for various actions

• The active involvement of local communities is absolutely necessary– Self-sustaining projects, high visibility of the Union

• Networking and exchange of experience brings additional value

Page 13: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Urban actions in EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013

1. Operational Programmes: The URBAN Community Initiative becomes part of the funding “mainstream”– “URBAN mainstreaming”: all regions can develop their area-based,

URBAN-type actions– More regional and national responsibility – different uptake in

Member States (best practice CZ and ES)– Focus of the actions widely remains on disadvantaged urban areas

and social inclusion, but also includes more potential-based approaches

– ESF cross-financing and local involvement sometimes problematic

Page 14: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Urban actions in EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013

2. Operational Programmes: the importance of urban development for EU investment has been increased in other funding areas– Actions to foster urban competitiveness (RTD, innovation clusters,

growth poles – especially in RCE regions)– Actions to increase the human capital (training)– Actions to develop urban infrastructures (clean urban transport,

waste water treatment, health infrastructures, brownfield development – especially in CONV regions)

– Actions to develop poly-centric structures or target urban-rural linkages (only a few cases)

Page 15: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Page 16: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Urban actions in EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013

Implementation through... a. regional and national Operational Programmes and

b. a new financial instrument „JESSICA“ (Joint European Support

for Sustainable Investment in City Areas – revolving urban development funds) - http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funds/2007/jjj/

Page 17: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Urban actions in EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013

3. European Territorial Co-operation: Focus on networking and the exchange of experience– Urban topics included in Cooperation Objective activities – URBACT as a specific programme for thematic exchanges

between cities– Regions for Economic Change initiative – Fast Track Networks

(links between networks and the mainstream OPs)

www.urbact.eu

Page 18: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Urban actions in EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013

4. Monitoring of urban development trends through the „Urban Audit“ and the „Urban Atlas“

www.urbanaudit.org

Page 19: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

How do we see the urban dimension of 2007-2013?

• Cities benefit massively from cohesion policy programmes, both through specific investment in urban development and through thematic priorities (infrastructures, SME support e.g.)

• The picture of integrated urban development is different. The mainstreaming of the URBAN Community Initiative has worked in numbers but not in terms of methodology:– Integrated projects vs sectoral actions– Role of cities vs power of regional/national MAs– Lack of innovation and experimentation– Lack of visibility

Page 20: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Where are we going?

• Urban policy as one of the Commissioner's political priorities (“urban strategy” will be developed)

• Three important aspects for preparing the post 2013 period:– Role of cities for delivering Europe 2020 (smart, sustainable and

socially inclusive growth)– Territorial cohesion as an “entry point” for an improved urban

dimension post 2013– Strengthened local level through the Lisbon Treaty

Page 21: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Where are we going?

• Important challenge of making the urban dimension consistent and visible

• Elements of an improved urban dimension of OPs– Integrated delivery of thematic Europe 2020 priorities– Better and clearer legal framework (involvement of city

authorities, IUDPs, ESF-type operations)– Greater coherence (“urban earmarking”?)– More space for experimentation– New URBACT – focus on skills and knowledge transfer on

integrated urban development– Financial engineering – Jessica

Page 22: REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Integrated urban development and EU Cohesion Policy Past, present, future Alexander FERSTL, European Commission, Directorate-General

REGIONAL POLICY

EUROPEAN COMMISSION