17
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION Author: Information Management Unit, Regional Office for West and Central Africa Contact: [email protected] Website: www.globaldtm.info / www.displacement.iom.int DTM ACTIVITIES IN THE REGION ARE SUPPORTED BY: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT West and Central Africa April – June 2018

REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATIONAuthor: Information Management Unit, Regional Office for West and Central AfricaContact: [email protected]: www.globaldtm.info / www.displacement.iom.int

DTM ACTIVITIES INTHE REGION ARE

SUPPORTED BY:

REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT

West and Central Africa

April – June 2018

Page 2: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

REPORT #2 — PAGE 2APR — JUN 2018

3. READING THIS REPORTThis reports presents two types of Flow Monitoring dashboards for each country. The FMPdashboards include information on general trends and types of travelers (age, gender,nationality, type of migration), while the FMS dashboards summarize the results of keyindicators obtained from each country in which surveys were conducted, providing a moredetailed profile of the observed travelers.

4. LIMITATIONMigrants adjust their routes according to opportunities and obstacles they encounter alongtheir journey, so their intended transit and destination locations tends to change while en-route. This renders the systematic assessment of their mobility throughout West and NorthAfrica more complex. Therefore, data collected in destination locations may not alwaysaccurately reflect flows detected in transit locations. Data variations depend on migratorymovements, FM methodology and the number of staff deployed in each FMP and theircapacity to capture all movements.

5. GLOSSARY : Available at the end of the report.

Methodology and TermsFLOW MONITORING

1. INTRODUCTIONIOM works with national and local authorities, as well as community-based organizations, tobetter understand migration movements in West and Central Africa. Using tools from theDisplacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) - the flow monitoring registry (FMR) and survey (FMS) -teams of enumerators work in major transit areas to monitor intra- and interregionalmigration movements.

2. FLOW MONITORING METHODOLOGYThe purpose of flow monitoring is to provide regularly updated information on the scale andprofile of population movements. This methodology has been developed to track movementflows of groups and individuals through key points of origin, transit locations and points ofdestination. The information and analysis provided by flow monitoring aims to betterunderstand and define shortcomings and priorities in the provision of assistance alongdisplacement/migratory routes.

The flow monitoring methodology includes direct observations at Flow Monitoring Points(FMPs) set up in places of entry, transit or exit in each country, as well as structuredinterviews with migrants and key stakeholders in transit points (including transportationworkers, housing workers and migration officials) to assess movement trends, routes andcountries of origin and destination. The locations of flow monitoring points are defined basedon previously conducted entry, exit and transit point assessments conducted with nationaland local authorities along main migration routes.

Two main tools constitute the flow monitoring methodology:

• The Flow Monitoring Registry (FMR) collects information on the number and frequencyof individuals transiting a particular location, through direct observation and keyinformant interviews (e.g. with bus drivers, transport companies, etc.).

• The Flow Monitoring Surveys (FMS) are conducted on a regular basis with a sample ofobserved travellers (7 individuals are chosen randomly, per day and per FMP), be theynationals or migrants in the country of the survey. Flow Monitoring Surveys gather moredetailed information about the educational and vocational backgrounds of travelers, theirintended destinations, the routes they have taken, and difficulties they have faced alongthe way.

The location of each Flow Monitoring Point determines what type of traveller may bepassing through it. Flow Monitoring Points located near borders or in large cities will be morelikely to have cross-border travelers passing through (those who intend to continue to othercountries). Flow Monitoring Points in other parts of each country may be more likely tocapture information on internal travelers moving from one part of the country to another.

FLOW MONITORING ACTIVITIES IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA

SENEGAL1 FMP413 travelers/day343 surveys

GUINEA3 FMPs697 travelers/day2,710 surveys

MALI10 FMPs376 travelers/day3,425 surveys NIGER

2 FMPs384 travelers/day CHAD

3 FMPs303 travelers/day1,049 surveys

NIGERIA2 FMPs1,202 travelers/day2,953 surveys

BURKINA FASO5 FMPs1,696 travelers/day1,316 surveys

COUNTRY# active Flow Monitoring PointsDaily average # of observed travelers# Flow Monitoring Surveys conducted

Page 3: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

31%

1,696INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

69% 18%

Four new FMPs have been installedbetween March and April 2018 inaddition to Ouagadougou FMP. They arelocated in Yendere on the border withCôte d’Ivoire (54% of all flowsobserved), Faramana (border with Mali),Dori and Kantchari (border with Niger)for a better understanding of migrationpatterns in Burkina Faso.

As a result of the new FMPs, aconsiderable increase of the dailyaverage of individuals observed has beennoted during the reporting period, ascompared to the previous quarter.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

The FMP of Yendere recorded thelargest flow (54%) as compared tothe other FMPs in Burkina Faso.Niamey, Abidjan, Yamoussokoro,Korhogo, Bamako and Bouakewere the main cities of destinationof flows observed in this quarter.

99%Bus

* Al

l flo

ws

MAIN MEAN OF TRANSPORT*

REPORT #2 — PAGE 3APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — BURKINA FASO

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN BURKINA FASO

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN BURKINA FASO

Côte d’Ivoire and Niger were the main countries of destination of the buses observed in thisquarter. 70% of flows observed between Burkina Faso and border countries were either seasonalor short term local movements.

The daily evolution of the flows observed between April and June 2018 in the different FMPs inBurkina Faso showed some variation this quarter.With the activation of the new FMPs in Burkina Faso, the maximum value of daily flows rosefrom 2,000 individuals in the previous quarter to more than 3,000 individuals at the end of thisquarter.

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Female Male

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Seasonal Short termlocal

movement

Economicmigration

Tourism

Data were not collected during the week end.

Page 4: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 4APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

BURKINA FASO

• Burkina Faso.

1,316

91%81%19%

1%9%

82%

10%

3%

5%

42%

27%

15%

6%

3%

1%

0%

6%

None

Primary

Lowersecondary

Uppersecondary

Tertiary

Professionaltraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

10%

67%

0%

5%

6%

12%

0%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking for ajob

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking fora job

Unemployed - looking for ajob

No answer

% Female% Male

2% 5%

60%

1%

28%

1% 3%

Acc

ess

tose

rvic

es

Att

end

fam

ilyev

ent

Econ

omic

reas

ons

Nat

ural

disa

ster

s

Re-jo

infa

mily

War

/con

flic

t

Oth

er 63%

17%

2%

16%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other 2%

Page 5: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

16%

303INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

84% 8%

Since March 2018, in addition to Kalait, two new FMPs wereinstalled in Faya and Zouarke, for a better understanding ofmigration flows in the north of Chad.

In this quarter, internal movements between the variouscities of Chad made up 69% of all flows observed.Additionally, flows going both ways between Chad and Libyaand some movements between Chad and Niger were alsoobserved during this period.

Abeche and Faya were the main cities of destination in Chad.Sebha and Mourzouq were the main cities of destination fromChad to Libya. Consistent with the results of the previousquarter, short term local movement and economic migrationremained the main types of observed movement, as with theprevious quarter.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

The demographic profile of travellers hasnot changed from the previous quarter.

An increase of 4% of minors has beenobserved in this quarter.

No major variation was noted on themeans of transport.

The graph below illustrates the daily evolution of the flows observed at the Kalait, Faya andZouarke FMP between April and June 2018.

During this quarter, the largest of flows was recorded in the FMP of Zouarke (42% of all flows).This peak coincides with preparations for Ramadan as individuals travel to join family members.In May, the flows decreased slightly due to weather conditions in the north which made travelextremely difficult.

52%Private Vehicle

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

48%Truck

REPORT #2 — PAGE 5APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — CHAD

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN CHAD

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN CHAD

The daily average of individuals traveling through the FMPs has slightly increased this quarter,due to the data captured at new FMPs installed in March.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chadian Sudanese Others

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

Female Male

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Short termlocal

movement

Economicmigration

Seasonal Dont know

Page 6: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 6APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

CHAD

• Chad.

1,049

43%91%9%

4%

57%

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Unknown

67%

15%

9%

8%

1%

50%

17%

8%

6%

4%

1%

0%

14%

None

Primary

LowerSecondary

UpperSecondary

Tertiary

ProfessionalTraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

5%

53%

0%

2%

2%

36%

2%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking for ajob

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not lookingfor a job

Unemployed - looking for ajob

No answer

% Female% Male

2% 2%

68%

17%

<0% <0%10%

Acc

ess

tose

rvic

es

Att

end

fam

ilyev

ent

Econ

omic

reas

ons

Re-jo

in fa

mily

Targ

eted

viol

ence

/per

sec

utio

n

War

/con

flict

Oth

er

36%

32%

9%

2%

21%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other

Page 7: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

43%

697INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

57% 18%

In this quarter, Kouremale, Nafadji (bothbordering Mali) and Bondoufourdou(bordering Senegal), were the three activeFMPs in Guinea.

Bondoufourdou (57% of all flows) andKouremale (40% of all flows) recorded themain flows observed in this quarter.

Short term local movement and economicmigration (90% both movements) werethe main type of movement of the flowsobserved in this quarter.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

During this quarter, the daily averageof the individuals recorded in thedifferent FMPs increased by 26%compared to the previous quarter of2018.

The demographic characteristics ofthe individuals observed during thisquarter have not changed significantlycompared to the last quarter.

This graph illustrates the daily evolution of the flows observed at the three FMPs of Guinea(Kouremale, Nafadji and Bondoufourdou) between April and June 2018.

89%Taxi

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

10%Bus

REPORT #2 — PAGE 7APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — GUINEA

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN GUINEA

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN GUINEA MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Female Male

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Short term localmovement

Economicmigration

Seasonal

As in the previous quarters, Guinean, Malian and Senegalese nationals were the main individualsobserved.

Page 8: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 8APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

GUINEA

• Guinea.89%

11%

85%15%

3%

2,710< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Unknown

53%

2%

1%

30%

14%

22%

15%

23%

20%

13%

2%

2%

3%

None

Primary

Lowersecondary

Uppersecondary

Tertiary

Professionaltraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

6%

56%

0%

8%

5%

24%

1%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not lookingfor a job

Unemployed - looking for ajob

No answer

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking fora job

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

% Female

% Male

2% 1%

79%

16%2%

Acc

ess

tose

rvic

es

Att

end

fam

ilyev

ent

Econ

omic

reas

ons

Re-jo

in fa

mily

Oth

er

88%

8%

1%

2%

1%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other

Page 9: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

11%

376INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN MALI

89% 6%

68%Public Bus

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

21%Private Vehicle

11%Truck

In Mali 10 FMPs are installed throughoutthe country in order to gain a betterunderstanding of the migration situationbetween Mali and cross borderingcountries.

During this quarter, Malian (35%),Guinean (27%), Ivoirian (8%), Senegalese(6%), Gambian (5%) and Nigerien (3%),were the main nationals observed, notingthat these were the main nationalitiesobserved, reflecting the nationalitiesobserved in the previous quarter.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

The FMPs of Gogui, Heremakono, Tomboucto, Bamako and Place Kidal, recorded the mainflows observed in this quarter.A significant increase of the flows from Algeria and Mauritania toward Mali was observed in thisperiod, in comparison to the previous quarter.

The graph below illustrates the evolution of the flows observed at the level of the FMPs of Malibetween April and June 2018.

The daily average decreased slightly(-1%) compared to the previousquarter.The demographic characteristics ofthe individuals observed during thisquarter have not changed muchcompared to the last quarter.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 9APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — MALI

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN MALI

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Female Male

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Economicmigration

Seasonal Short termlocal

movement

Forcedmovement(Conflict)

Page 10: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 10APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

MALI

• Mali.99%

3,425

5% 95%

2%1%

18%

35%

23%

13%

2%

5%

0%

4%

None

Primary

LowerSecondary

UpperSecondary

Tertiary

ProfessionalTraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%

Employed

Self-employed

Student

Unemployed - not looking fora job

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

% Female% Male

6%

39%

2%

2%

51%

0%

Employed

Self-employed

Student

Unemployed - not looking fora job

Unemployed - looking for ajob

No answer

0%

81%

18%

0% 1%

Att

end

fam

ilyev

ent

Econ

omic

reas

ons

Re-jo

infa

mily

War

/con

flic

t

Oth

er 84%

0%

0%

0%

16%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Unknown

93%

6%

<1%

<1%

<1%

Page 11: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN NIGERSince February 2016, flow monitoringof individuals has been conducted intwo locations in the region of Agadez,Niger.

During this quarter, the mainlocations of departure of flows wereAgadez (Niger), Sebha (Libya) andNguezzam (Algeria).

Economic migration (39% of all flows)was the main movement observed inthis quarter.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

Between April to June 2018, in addition to Nigerians (66%), Malians (5%), Libyans (4%),Guineans (4%), Nigerians (4%), and Chadians (3%) were the main nationalities observed in theboth FMPs.During this quarter, many cases of return have been observed in observed at Niger's FMPs.

This graph illustrates the daily evolution of the number of individuals observed at Niger'sFMPs. This does not reflect the totality of individuals passing through these points, but ratheran overview of mobility observed from April to June 2018. At the beginning of May, asignificant number of individuals has been returned from Algeria, hence this peak observed thisquarter.

During this quarter of 2018, thedemographic characteristics ofthe individuals observed have notchanged much compared to thelast quarter.

The means of transport usedhave decreased slightly comparedto the last quarter, and privatevehicles remain the main meansof transport used.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 11APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — NIGER

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN NIGER

72%Private Vehicle

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

14%Truck 5%

Public bus

9% 91% 7%

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

384INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Female Male

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Nigerien Malian Lybian Guinean Nigerian Chadian0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Economicmigration

Seasonal Dont know Short termlocal

movement

Page 12: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

22%

1,207INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

72% 16%

60%Car

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

38%Public Bus 2%

Others

In March 2017, two FMPs wereestablished in Kano and Sokoto, Nigeria,where significant flows of individuals ofdifferent nationalities were observed.

69% of main flows observed went fromNigeria toward Niger, and 27% fromNiger to Nigeria.

Short term local movement andeconomic migration (together makingup 76% of all flows) were the mainmovement observed.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

The main nationalities observed during this period were Nigerian (51%), Nigerien (32%),Chadian (5%), Malian (4%) and Cameroonian (2%).

A significant decrease (-37%)of individuals observed atFMPs has been recordedduring this period, incomparison to the firstquarter of the year.

The graph below illustrates the daily evolution of the flows observed at the level of theNigerian FMPs between April and June 2018. During this period, a decrease in flows coincideswith the onset of the rainy season, which leads individuals to stay home and focus on farmingactivities.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 12APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — NIGERIA

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN NIGERIA

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN NIGERIA

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Female Male

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Short termlocal

movement

Economicmigration

Seasonal Tourism

Page 13: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 13APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

NIGERIA

• Nigeria.96%81%19%

0

2,953

4%

3%

4%

24%

56%

11%

1%

0%

1%

None

Primary

LowerSecondary

UpperSecondary

Tertiary

ProfessionalTraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

0%

14%

0%

2%

1%

82%

1%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking for ajob

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking for ajob

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

% Female

% Male

NATIONALITIES SURVEYED

5% <0%

93%

1% <0% <0%

Acc

ess

to s

ervi

ces

Att

end

fam

ily e

vent

(wed

ding

, fun

eral

,et

c.)

Econ

omic

rea

sons

Re-jo

in fa

mily

War

/con

flict

Oth

er

78%

18%

4%

0%

0%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Unknown

65%

33%

2%

<1%

<1%

NER 5%

Page 14: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT THE FM IN SENEGAL

36%

413INDIVIDUALS RECORDED

DAILYAVERAGE

64% 7%

Since April 2017, flow monitoringdata has been collected inTambacounda, a main transit town inSenegal.

During the three months covered,individuals of mainly Senegalese,Malian, Guinean and Gambiannationality were identified at theTambacounda FMP, reflecting therole played by Tambacounda inregional migration.

% of minors amongindividuals recorded

The demographic characteristics ofthe individuals observed during thisquarter have not changedsignificantly compared to the lastquarter.

The graph below illustrates the daily evolution of the flows observed at the TambacoundaFMP between April and June 2018. The daily average numbers decreased by 12% incomparison to the previous quarter.

78%Bus

MAIN MEANS OF TRANSPORT (all flows)

22%Private Vehicle

REPORT #2 — PAGE 14APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING REGISTRY — SENEGAL

PROFILE OF PERSONS OBSERVED AT FMPs IN SENEGAL

DAILY INDIVIDUALS RECORDED AT FMPs IN SENEGAL

Short term local movement and seasonal movement (together making up 70%), were themain types of movement observed during this period.

MAIN MOVEMENTS OBSERVED MAIN NATIONALITIES OBSERVED

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Female Male

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Senegalese Malian Guinean Gambian BissauGuinean

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Short termlocal

movement

Seasonal Economicmigration

Dont know

Page 15: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

Flow Monitoring Surveys compliment FMR data by gathering informationabout travellers’ educational and vocational backgrounds, intendeddestinations, routes, and difficulties faced along the way.

REPORT #2 — PAGE 15APR — JUN 2018FLOW MONITORING SURVEY —

EDUCATION

PRE-DEPARTURE EMPLOYMENT STATUS

DEPARTURE & INTENDED DESTINATION COUNTRIES*

REASONS FOR DEPARTURE ECONOMIC REASONS (DETAILS)

REPORTED DIFFICULTIES

LENGTH OF JOURNEY TO DATE

TYPE OF TRAVEL INTENDEDSURVEYS

* The numbers in the chart refer to the number of survey respondents. See last page for glossary of ISO3 codes and country names

DEMOGRAPHICS

Cross-border

Domestic

Cross-border travel:Respondents whosecountry of final intendeddestination is differentfrom their country ofdeparture.Internal travel: Whenrespondents intend totravel within the samecountry.

Adults

Minors

< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

SENEGAL

• Senegal.

343

84%

16%

17%

0

83%< 2 weeks

2 weeks – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Unknown

70%

28%

2%

<1%

<1%

22%

43%

22%

6%

3%

0%

1%

3%

None

Primary

LowerSecondary

UpperSecondary

Tertiary

ProfessionalTraining

Post-graduate

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

None

Primary

Lower Secondary

Upper Secondary

Tertiary

Professional Training

Post-graduate

Other

% Female

% Male

6%

54%

0%

1%

5%

32%

2%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking for ajob

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%

Employed

Self-employed

Retired

Student

Unemployed - not looking fora job

Unemployed - looking for a job

No answer

% Female% Male

4% 4%

80%

<0% 7% 1% 1% 2%

Acc

ess

to s

ervi

ces

Att

end

fam

ilyev

ent

Econ

omic

rea

sons

Nat

ural

disa

ster

s

Re-jo

in fa

mily

Targ

eted

vio

lenc

eor

per

secu

tion

War

/con

flict

Oth

er

27%

69%

3%

1%

0%

Job opportunities

Business

Commuting

Agro-pastoral activities

Other

NATIONALITIES SURVEYED

Page 16: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

REPORT #2 — PAGE 16APR — JUN 2018Glossary of Terms and Country ISO3 Codes

Code CountryAGO AngolaAUS AustraliaBEL BelgiumBEN BeninBFA Burkina FasoBGR BulgariaCAN CanadaCHE Czechia

CIV Côte d'IvoireCMR CameroonCOD/COG the Democratic

Republic of Congo

CPV Cabo VerdeCYP Cyprus DEU Germany DZA AlgeriaEGY EgyptESP SpainETH EthiopiaFRA FranceGAB GabonGBR Great BritainGHA GhanaGIN GuineaGMB GambiaGNB Guinea BissauGNQ Equatorial Guinea

GRC Greece ITA ItalyLBR LiberiaLBY LibyaMAR MoroccoMLI MaliMOZ MozambiqueMRT MauritaniaNER NigerNGA NigeriaNLD Netherlands NOR Norway POL PolandPRT PortugalQAT QatarROU RomaniaSDN SudanSEN SenegalSLE Sierra LeoneSWE SwedenTCD ChadTGO TogoTUN TunisiaTUR TurkeyUKR UkraineUSA United States

Country of departure: The country that respondents departed from at the beginning oftheir journey. This may be their country of nationality, country of residence (if they had beenliving there for at least one year prior to departure), or a third country that they aredeparting to return to their country of habitual residence.

Country of intended destination: The country that respondents intend to reach at theend of their journey.

Cross-border travel: Travel where the intended destination country of respondents wasdifferent than their country of departure (please note, this relates to respondents’intentions, and not their current location when surveyed).

Economic reasons: Those who selected “economic reasons” as their main reason fordeparture were asked to provide more details on the type of economic reason motivatingthem to travel.

Education: The highest level of formal education completed prior to departure.

Flow Monitoring Point (FMP): Points set up by IOM’s Displacement Tracking Matrix inhigh-mobility areas in each country covered (near borders or main travel routes).

Flow Monitoring Registry (FMR): Data collection tool gathering data on the numbers,demographics, and locations of departure and destination for travelers observed at FlowMonitoring Points (FMPs). Data is collected on a daily basis through direct observation oftravelers and key informant (KI) interviews.

Flow Monitoring Survey (FMS): Data collection tool gathering data directly from migrantson their backgrounds, their journey, and their intentions.

Internal travel: The departure and intended destination countries of respondents are thesame, and the survey with those individuals was conducted in the same country.

Minor: Only minors aged 14 and over were surveyed; the proportion of minors providedtherefore only represents survey respondents, and understates the proportion of minorspresent among travelers.

Employment Status: The employment status of respondents prior to departure.

Reason for departure: The main reason for departure for migrants on their journey.

Glossary

Page 17: REGIONAL MIGRATION REPORT · Cross-border travel: Respondents whose country of final intended destination is different from their country of departure. Internal travel: When respondents

FOR MORE INFORMATION ON IOM DTM AND FMP IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA:

http://displacement.iom.int/http://migration.iom.inthttp://www.nigermigrationresponse.org

Regional Office - CONTACT: [email protected]

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATIONAuthor: Information Management Unit, Regional Office for West and Central AfricaContact: [email protected]: www.globaldtm.info / www.rodakar.iom.int

DTM ACTIVITIES INTHE REGION ARE

SUPPORTED BY: