13
REGION H Water Planning Group Freese and Nichols, Inc. | LBG-Guyton Associates | Ekistics Corporation WATER CONSERVATION IN THE 2016 REGION H WATER PLAN What’s in the Plan? How much conservation do we need and how are we going to get there? 07 January 2016

REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

REGION HWater Planning Group

Freese and Nichols, Inc. | LBG-Guyton Associates | Ekistics Corporation

WATER CONSERVATION IN THE2016 REGION H WATER PLAN

What’s in the Plan?

How much conservation do we need and how are we going to get there?

07 January 2016

Page 2: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

The 2016 Region H Regional Water Plan

Page 3: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

The Role of Conservation

Conservation

Reuse

Reservoirs Groundwater

Transmission

Treatment

Desalination GRPs

Page 4: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Conservation: What You See, What You Don’t

Irrigation Municipal Industrial

Sector-wide reductions based

on long-term trends in water use.

Water loss reduction methods

and advanced conservation approaches.

Approaches to on-farm methods and

reduction in conveyance loss.

Unit demand reduction based on projected plumbing code requirements

and the adoption of efficient appliances.

Assumed efficiency factors

incorporated into the original

projections of long-term demand.

Current practices in use throughout the region, motivated

by economic efficiency.

Page 5: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Water Loss Reduction

Municipal Conservation in the 2016 RWP

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%Lo

st W

ater

(B

illio

ns

of

Gal

lon

s)

Nu

mb

er o

f R

egio

n H

Uti

litie

s

Water Loss Less Than (%)

Number of Utilities Lost Water

Target systems with >10% losses

1% reduction annually

Target of 10% maximum loss

Page 6: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Advanced Conservation

Municipal Conservation in the 2016 RWP

Goldwater Study Focus on meeting 2011 RWP goals in 5

counties

2-year program with ongoing objectives

Direct interaction with participating utilities

Various recommended practices Landscape controllers, audits, and surveys

Efficient commercial fixtures

Toilet rebates

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

Po

ten

tial

Co

nse

rvat

ion

(ac

-ft/

yr)

Low Projection High Projection

Page 7: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Comprehensive Conservation in 2016 RWP

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

Co

nse

rvat

ion

(A

cre-

Feet

per

Yea

r)

Baseline Water Loss Advanced Conservation Manufacturing Irrigation 2011 RWP Conservation (Incl. Baseline)

Page 8: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Municipal Conservation in 2016 RWP

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

Co

nse

rvat

ion

(A

cre-

Feet

per

Yea

r)

Baseline Water Loss Advanced Conservation

Page 9: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Municipal Conservation Strategies in 2016 RWP

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070

Co

nse

rvat

ion

(A

cre-

Feet

per

Yea

r)

Baseline Water Loss Advanced Conservation

Page 10: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Water Loss

Recommended for 135 utilities in the RWP with excess water loss Includes 8 County-Other user groups

Year 2020 program 11,132 acre-feet saved annually

$6.3-million annually

Year 2070 program 49,457 acre-feet saved annually

$27.4-million annually

Advanced Conservation

Recommended for 205 utilities demonstrating reasonable potential Includes 8 County-Other user groups

Year 2020 program 9,052 acre-feet saved annually

$7.4-million annually

Year 2070 program 101,203 acre-feet saved annually

$11.4-million annually

Conservation Opportunities for SWIFT Funding

Page 11: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Where do I Fit?

Water User Groups (WUGs)

Cities with population over 500

Utilities using over 280 ac-ft/yr

Collective Reporting Units (CRUs)

County-Other

Everyone else

Smaller utilities

Smaller communities

Users without a water system

Page 12: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

Opportunities for Conservation Funding

State Water Implementation Fund for Texas (SWIFT)

$2 billion to implement the state water plan

20% Designated for Reuse and Water Conservation

10% Designated for Agricultural Conservation

City of Bedford

Distribution system conservation program

$90 million

City of Fort Worth

• Meter Upgrade and Replacement Program (Smart Meters, Leak Detection)

• $76 million

Page 13: REGION H - Texas Living Waters Projecttexaslivingwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Freese... · 2018. 3. 6. · $27.4-million annually Advanced Conservation Recommended for 205

REGION HWater Planning Group

Freese and Nichols, Inc. | LBG-Guyton Associates | Ekistics Corporation

WATER CONSERVATION IN THE2016 REGION H WATER PLAN

What’s in the Plan?

How much conservation do we need and how are we going to get there?

07 January 2016