Upload
lazaro
View
26
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Reforming the Income Tax: A Citizen’s Proposal. Richard A Demers Minneapolis, MN April 1, 2014. Contents. Why is income tax reform needed? What are the goals of this Citizen’s Proposal? What income should be taxed? Transferring income among individuals Taxing asset transactions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Reforming the Income Tax:A Citizen’s Proposal
Richard A DemersMinneapolis, MN
April 1, 2014
2
Why is income tax reform needed? What are the goals of this Citizen’s
Proposal? What income should be taxed? Transferring income among individuals Taxing asset transactions Taxing income by formula Income taxes and the national budget? Household examples
Contents
3
Neither fair nor just Too many ways to avoid and evade taxes Too complicated, intrusive and expensive It harms the national economy
◦ Too much interference ◦ Drag on the national economy
It fails to adequately fund the government◦ Annual deficits◦ Ever increasing federal debt
Why does the income tax system need to be reformed?
4
Raise enough money for government operations in a way that is fair, just, simple and efficient
Eliminate tax biases in favor of some people and businesses at the expense of everyone else
Automatically link taxation with spending
Take control of the details of income taxation out of the hands of politicians who don’t really know what they are doing anyway
What are the goals of this Citizen’s Proposal?
5
It is not the goal of this proposal to Reduce taxes Redistribute wealth Reduce the size of government Reduce government spending
What are NOT goals of this Citizen’s Proposal?
6
Yes, if we incorporate good ideas from many sources
Libertarian Taxation should intrude as little as possible in our lives and economy. People should have some say in how their taxes are spent.
Conservative Income shouldn’t be taxed more than once - dividends, gifts, estates. Rely as much as possible on the national economy, not government, to meet
society’s needs.
Liberal We are a community and not just individuals. We should help people who help themselves to get ahead. Taxes should be progressive and affect everyone to the same extent.
Is real reform possible?
7
Every person, every business and every non-profit – no exceptions As individuals - infants to corporations Eliminate Single vs. Married distinctions Eliminate personal vs. business vs. non-profit
distinctions
If businesses want to be treated as individuals for other purposes, they should be taxed as individuals.
Who should be Taxed?
8
Tax all Income – no exceptions Individuals,
Wages, tips, bonuses, awards, realized options, interest, dividends, pensions, Social Security payments, welfare payments, insurance and annuity payouts, jury awards, alimony, lottery and gambling winnings, etc.
Capital gains taxed as income only if not reinvested Gifts and estates not considered income
Businesses, Net, pre-tax business income
Non-profits Same as service businesses
What income should be taxed?
9
No deductions, credits, allowances, exclusions or rebates to anyone or any organization
for any purpose
"We are all in the tax game together, and what is a privilege to one group of people
ends up being a penalty to everyone else through higher tax rates.“ Taxing Ourselves: A Citizen's Guide to the Debate Over Taxes
by Joel Slemrod and Jon Bakija, 2008, p. 89.
Eliminate all loopholes
10
Social Security and Medicare are currently financed through wage taxes
Social Security wage taxes not progressive◦ Only on wages below a cutoff◦ Greatly increases the tax burden of low income people
Social Security is not an annuity◦ The so called SS Trust Fund is a bookkeeping gimmick
Social Security and Medicare benefits should be financed by the entire nation through income taxes
Eliminate all wage taxes
11
Any amount of pre-tax income can be transferred to any other individual or organization where it is taxed as part of the receiver’s income.
Family transfers among members Windfall transfers to IRAs Corporate transfers to stockholders as dividends Transfers to non-profits as contributions Limitations on transfers
All income transfers become part of online public record
Income Transfers
12
The income of a household can be transferred among its members so each is taxed at the lower rate of a progressive tax.
Family Transfers
Tax Rate
Income
Household
Member
13
One-time income from inheritances, insurance payouts, lottery winnings, bonuses, high income years, etc
Income can be transferred to flexible IRA type accounts
Taxed as income on withdrawal
Windfall Transfers
14
After-expense, pre-tax income can be transferred◦ To stockholders as dividends◦ To subsidiaries to enhance their capitalization◦ To non-profits
Eliminates double taxation of profits and dividends
Eliminates unfairness of different tax rates for wage vs. investment income
Strong incentive for businesses to pay better dividends and to support non-profits
Corporate Transfers
15
Non-profits viewed as service businesses No distinctions made among non-profits
◦ charitable, religious, political, cultural, etc Net income taxed after operational
◦ Property costs, salaries, supplies, etc Non-profits can be viewed as transfer
agents when income received is transferred directly to beneficiaries
Transfers to Non-profits
16
Objective: Help citizens become rich in assets and part of the so called “ownership society”◦ Assets: anything that generates a monetary return◦ Examples: real estate, stocks, bonds, mutual funds,
savings accounts, farms, real estate, businesses, etc
Assets can be freely converted from one form to another with no tax consequences
Assets can be freely transferred from one individual to another with no tax consequences
Asset Transfers
17
When sold and any part of the proceeds are taken as income◦ This makes this proposal a consumption tax.
Losses are the investors responsibility, not the government’s
When are Assets taxed?
18
Gift taxes eliminated Estate taxes eliminated The special treatment of Capital Gains and
Losses is eliminated
All asset transfers part of online public record
Consequences of Asset Transfers
19
No quid pro quo transfers No reciprocal transfers from whom the
donor can extract an advantage◦ Money◦ Assets◦ Influence
Violations to be prosecuted as tax fraud
Limitations on Transfers
20
Why taxes?◦ To pay for essential governmental services ◦ Which services are essential is not part of this proposal◦ Should not be to encourage or discourage any activity
How high should taxes be?◦ As high as necessary to pay for budgeted spending◦ Tax-cutting without cutting spending is foolish◦ New spending without new revenues is foolish
Should individuals have a say in how their taxes are spent by the government?◦ Yes, to the extent that they are willing to transfer income and assets
to organizations that can otherwise provide required services
Taxation
21
Why not a flat tax?◦ Inherently regressive ◦ Does not affect everyone to the same extent
Why should taxes be progressive?◦ High income individuals receive
disproportionately more value from living in a modern society
◦ As an incentive for individuals to transfer income to non-profits Example: privatize NASA and get to MARS sooner
Tax Rates
22
Simple way to determine taxes at all income levels
◦ Calculated per individual, not household
◦ The same formula used for individuals and businesses
◦ From incomes of $0 to $1 Trillion-12 orders of magnitude
If your income is $x, your income tax is f(x) = $y.
Taxation by formula
23
tax = k × (basic rate × income) – offset
Basic rate depends on income◦ 0% at $0 and 100% at $1 Trillion◦ All taxes are on individuals◦ No special rates for single vs. family vs. business vs. non-profits
offset depends on earned wages◦ Similar to existing Earned Income Tax Credit
k depends on◦ National spending budget◦ Population in each income range.◦ Calculated repeatedly until the generated tax revenue equals budgeted spending.
Actual tax rate = tax / income
Taxation by Formula
24
Basic rate = (1.059463log(income) - 1)
Basic Rate
1E+00 1E+04 1E+08 1E+120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Basic tax rate Individual Income
Basic rate= xlog(income) - 1 1 = x12 - 12 = x12
x = the 12th root of 2 x = 1.059463
25
Depends on earned wages◦ Similar to current Earned Income Tax Credit◦ Calculated per individual, not per family◦ Encourages all citizens to work for their living◦ No offset for those able to pay taxes
Offset
Offset
Plateau = $2,000
Phase-in limit = $3,000
Phase-out limit = $100,000
Plateau limit = $4,000
Wages
Other income limit = $4,000
26
Ideal tax = 1 × (basic rate × income) – offset
Ideal rate = ideal tax / income
Ideal Rates
• Ignores spending budget • Ignores population distribution
1E+00 1E+04 1E+08 1E+12-100%-80%-60%-40%-20%
0%20%40%60%80%
100%Ideal tax rate as % of individual income
Basic tax rate Ideal Tax Rate Total individual income
Ideal Tax Rate
27
2011 Household Income
Most tax revenue from households with a modest incomeRevenue from high income households also required
1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09 1E+101E+00
1E+07
1E+14
Households and Household Income
Households Total household income Income
DollarsHouseholds
28
Goal: Determine if proposal is reasonable
Revenue target is sum of◦ 2011 individual income tax ◦ 2011 employee FICA and Medicare wage taxes
Limited to personal income◦ Population distribution from IRS tables
Business, gift, estate and non-profit income not part of model because income distribution not available
Allocates household income equally to all members
2011 Spreadsheet Model
29
Individual Tax Revenue Individual, estate and trust income tax $1,175,989,528,000
Employee FICA + Medicare wage taxes $481,552,411,000
Total individual tax revenue
$1,657,541,939,000
Estate and Gift Tax Revenue Gift tax $6,572,384,000 Estate tax $2,506,991,000
Total Estate and Gift Tax revenue
$9,079,375,000
Organizational Tax Revenue Corporate income tax $242,435,939,000
Employer FICA + Medicare wage taxes $481,552,411,000
Tax-exempt unrelated business income tax $412,183,000 Total organization tax revenue
$242,848,122,000
Revenue Target of 2011 Spreadsheet Model $1,657,541,939,000
2011 Tax Revenue
30
tax = k × (basic rate × income) – offsetwhere k = 0.692
Proposed 2011 Taxes
• Assumes equal allocation of household income• Includes FICA and Medicare financing• Model does not include business income
$1,000 $10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000-60%-50%-40%-30%-20%-10%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%Individual Tax Rate
Basic Tax Rate Proposed individual tax rate Individdual Income+ FICA + Medicare
Individual Tax Rate
31
2011 Income vs. Tax Revenue
$10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000$100,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$100,000,000,000
Proposed tax revenue 2011 combined tax revenueNegative values cannot be shown on a log chart.
32
Dad earns $x per year Mom earns $y per year Their two children have no income The family transfers 10% to charities, their
church, their political party and cultural non-profits
For tax purposes, they allocate the rest equally (25%) to each person
Household Example
33
Household income $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $50,000 $100,000 $250,000 $1,000,000% of income transferred out 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Taxable household income $9,000 $18,000 $27,000 $45,000 $90,000 $225,000 $900,000
% of taxable household income per person 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25%
Each person's taxable income $2,250 $4,500 $6,750 $11,250 $22,500 $56,250 $225,000log(each person's taxable income) 3.352182518 3.653212514 3.829303773 4.051152522 4.352182518 4.750122527 5.352182518
Basic tax rate 21.3646369% 23.4933971% 24.7559095% 26.3648770% 28.5813424% 31.5711276% 36.2271747%
Basic tax rate * income $481 $1,057 $1,671 $2,966 $6,431 $17,759 $81,511 Phase in offset $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Plateau offset $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Phase out offset $0.00 $1,989.58 $1,942.71 $1,848.96 $1,614.58 $911.46 $0.00 offset $1,500.00 $1,989.58 $1,942.71 $1,848.96 $1,614.58 $911.46 $0.00
Each person's tax -$1,083.72 -$1,074.06 -$495.62 $719.61 $3,954.42 $14,467.44 $70,587.79Each person's tax rate -48.17% -23.87% -7.34% 6.40% 17.58% 25.72% 31.37%
Household tax -$4,335 -$4,296 -$1,982 $2,878 $15,818 $57,870 $282,351Household tax rate -48.17% -23.87% -7.34% 6.40% 17.58% 25.72% 31.37%
Household take-home income $13,335 $22,296 $28,982 $42,122 $74,182 $167,130 $617,649
$10,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $100,000,000 $1,000,000,000-60.00%
-40.00%
-20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
Household tax rate
Household tax rate
34
Tax all income Eliminate all loopholes Allow income and assets to be transferred
without tax consequences All taxes are on individual persons and
businesses Tax all income using a single progressive
formula that spans 12 orders of magnitude Make all income, transfer and tax
information available online and transparent
Proposal Summary
35
A much more complete model is needed!
This is a work in progress, a stake in the ground.
Please throw rocks at it.
Proposal Status
36
taxreformproposal.org
Tax proposal home page with links to: Tax proposal essay Early comments Spreadsheet model This slide show About the author
Links