18
Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs Sean J. Carey Boston College

Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

  • Upload
    mabli

  • View
    30

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs. Sean J. Carey Boston College. MSX Celestial Group. Stephan Price (AFRL) : PI Michael Egan (AFRL) : Source extraction Image Construction Sean Carey (BC): Positional refinement Thomas Kuchar (BC) : Artifact mitigation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric

CatalogsSean J. Carey

Boston College

Page 2: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

MSX Celestial Group

• Stephan Price (AFRL) : PI• Michael Egan (AFRL) : Source extraction• Image Construction

– Sean Carey (BC): Positional refinement– Thomas Kuchar (BC) : Artifact mitigation– Don Mizuno (BC) : Dark offset corrections

Page 3: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Introduction

• Statement of Problem• Description of DAF Errors & Artifacts• Solution• Fits to Astrometric Truth• Summary

Page 4: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Statement of Problem

• Program Requirements – Tenth of detector (1.8) Accuracy– Absolute Pointing– Needed for Image Registration, Super-resolution

• Astrometry – Ring Laser Gyros and Star Tracker– APL Definitive Attitude File (DAF)

• time evolution of the boresight pointing• typical errors 15-45, time varying

Page 5: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

MSX/IRAS Comparison

Carina Nebula

Page 6: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF ErrorsJumps

• Jumps in Star Tracker– ~3% of long scans

• Register Bad Portion– Usually short segment– Use astrometric matches

• Update DAF– Adjust boresight– Difference quaternions

• Create• Apply

Page 7: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF ErrorsGaps

• Data Dropouts– ~3% of DCEs– Recover radiometer data

• Interpolate – Boresight position– Spacecraft position – Spacecraft velocity

Page 8: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF Errors Noise

• High Frequency Noise– Amplitude up to 4– 1/f noise for f > 1 Hz

• Wiener (optimal) Filter– Remove in-scan trend– Fit noise model to PSD

• Filter Boresight– In-scan– Cross-scan

Page 9: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF ErrorsFilter Construction / Application

• In-scan boresight filter• Cross-scan similar

• 1-4 amplitude• High noise segments

Page 10: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF ErrorsAttitude Adjustment

• Point Source Association Criteria– Position Match– Simultaneous Flux Match

• Two step Fitting Process– Fit to Astrometric Truth– MSX to MSX Registration (Global Refinement)

• Iterate until convergence (2 iterations)

• Cubic Splines– Least Squares Fit

Page 11: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Astrometric Sources

• MSX Astrometric Catalog (0.12-0.2 error)– ACRS– PPM– Fluxes: IRAS + models

• Need Additional Sources for Sparse Regions– Refined MSX Sources -or where available -– 2MASS Positions (< 0.2 error) -and-– MSX Refined Fluxes

Page 12: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Fit to Astrometric Truth

Page 13: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Global Registration

Page 14: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Pointing Improvement

• MSX - Astrometric• 30 match window• Global refinement

(l) = 0.54 (b) = 0.61

• MSX - MSX • 30 match window• Global refinement

(l) = 1.53 (b) = 2.15

Page 15: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Pointing Improvement Registration of Images

Pre-refinement Post-refinement

Page 16: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Pointing Improvement Summary

• MSX-Astrometric Match Uncertainty– In-scan (l) = 0.8– Cross-scan (b) = 1.0

• MSX-2MASS Uncertainty– Independent Measure– In-scan (l) = 1.80– Cross-scan (b) = 1.87

Page 17: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Summary

• Mission Requires < 1.8 Positional Accuracy• Boresight Positions Refined Through

– Optimal Filtering– Comparison with Astrometric Truth– Global Registration (solution)

• Met Program Requirement– Imaging– Version 2 of MSX PSC

Page 18: Refinement of MSX Attitude Using Infrared Astrometric Catalogs

Description of DAF Errors

• Jumps• Gaps• Noise• Attitude errors