REFERENCES - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesiarepository.upi.edu/21256/9/D_BING_1006911_Bibliography.pdf · Biantoro, A.W. (2009) Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Islam: Perbedaamn Skripsi,

Sutanto, 2015 THESIS WRITING SUPERVISION: A CONTRIBUTION OF FEEDBACK TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS’ THESIS WRITING Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

183

REFERENCES

Abiddin, Z. N. (2007). Challenges in Ph.D studies: The case of arts student.

European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.5(2), pp. 83-93.

Acker, S., Hill, T. & Black, E. (1994). Thesis Supervision in the social sciences:

Managed or Negotiated? Higher Education, Vol.28, pp. 483-498.

Adrian-Taylor, S., Noels, K. & Tischler, K. (2007). Conflict between international

graduate students and faculty supervisor: Toward effective conflict

prevention and management strategies. Journal of Studies in

International education, Vol. 11(1), pp. 90-117.

Alamis, M. P. (2010). Evaluating Students‘ Reactions and Responses to Teachers‘

Written Feedbacks. Philippine ESL Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 57-72

Anderson, D. J. Major, R. L. & Mitchell, R. R. (1992). Teacher supervision that

works: A guide for university supervisors. New York: Praeger.

Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical

rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and

Distance Learning, Vol.4(2).

Anson, C. M. (1989). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research.

Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

APA. (2003). Publication Manual. Washington D.C.: Author.

Armstrong, S. (2004) The Impact of Supervisor‘s Cognitive Styles on the Quality

of Research Supervision in Management Education. British Journal of

Educational Psychology, Vol.74, pp. 599-616

Arbur, R. (1977). The student-teacher conference. College Composition and

Communication, Vol. 28(4), pp. 338-342.

Archer-Kath, J. D., Johnson, W. D., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Individual versus

group feedback in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology,

vol.134(5), pp. 681-694.

Arndt, V. (1993). Response to writing: using feedback to inform the writing

process. In M. Dalam N. Brock and L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching

Composition Around the Pacific Rim:Politics and Pedagogy (pp. 90-116).

UK: Multilingual Matters.


184

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in

education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Askew, S. (2000). Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge Falmer.

Austin, A. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of

assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York:

Macmillan Publishing Company.

Bailey, F. & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment

worth the paper it is written on? Teachers‘ reflection on their practices.

Journal of Teaching in. Higher Education. Vol 15/2, pp. 187-189.

Baldwin, J. R. (1999). Innovation, training and success. Ottawa, Canada:

Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch

Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O‘Connor, R., Jr. (1989). Effects of cognitive

feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410–433

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A. & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The

instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational

Research, 61 (2), 213–238.

Bates, L. L. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to ESL composition. Boston:

Heinle and Heinle.

Berg, C. E. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students‘ revision

types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.

8, pp. 215– 237.

Bergman, M.M. (2009) Advances in Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage

Biantoro, A.W. (2009) Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Islam: Perbedaamn Skripsi,

Tesis, and Disertasi. Media Informasi Mahasiswa Pascasarjana UIKA

Biber, D., T. Nekrasova & B. Horn. (2011). The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2 writing development: A meta-analysis. (TOEFL iBT

Research Report No. 14). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2nd ed. Brekshire:

Open University Press.


185

Bitchener, J. & Young, S. A. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective

feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing.

Vol.14, pp. 191–205

Bitchener, P.J., Basturkmen, H., East, M. & Meyer, H. (2011). Best Practice in

Supervisor Feedback to Thesis Students. Wellington: Ako Aotearoa

Black, P. H. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire,

England: Open University Press.

Black, P. & William, D. (1998) Assessment in classroom learning. Assessment

Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 5/1, 7-74

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma problem: The search for methods of group

instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher

Vol.13, pp. 8-16.

Blumberg, A. (1978). Supervision and interpersonal intervention. Journal of

Classroom Interaction, Vol. 13/1, 23–32.

Bolker, J. (1988) Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day. New York:

Henry Holt and Company, LLC.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning

society. Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 22/2, pp. 151-167.

Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2006) Aligning assessment with long term learning.

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31/4. 399-413

Bower, Jack & Kawaguchi, Satomi (2001). Negotiation of Meaning and

Corrective Feedback. Language Learning & Technology, Volume 15/1,

pp. 41–71 .

Braunstein, J. W. (2007). Research Methodology Help for Dissertation Students.

ResearchConsultation.com. Brender, A. (1998). Conferencing: An Interactive Way to Teach Writing. The

Language Teacher Online. Retrieved May 3, 2008, from

http://www.jaltpublications.org/tlt/files/98/jul/brender.html.

Brender, A. (1995). ‗An investigation of diffrences between peer tutors and

faculty tutors.‘Paper presented at the international Writing center

Conference, . St. Louis, MO.


186

Brockner, J., S. Grover, T. Reed, R. DeWitt, and M. O‘Malley 1987 ―Survivors‘

reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends.‖ Admin-

istrative Science Quarterly, 32: 526–542.

Brookhart, S. M. (2008) How to give effective feedback to your students.

Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

Brophy, J.E. (1981) Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational

Reseach, 51 (1), pp. 5-32

Brounstein, M. (2014) Giving Constructive. Retrieved 24 January 2014 from

Feedback.http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-

feedback.html

Brounstein, M. ( 2012). Giving Constructive Feedback, New Jersey: John Wiley

& Sons, Inc, http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-

constructive-.

Brown, R. (1994) The 'big picture' about managing writing, in: O. Zuber-Skerritt

& Ryan, Y. (Eds) Quality in Postgraduate Education, pp. 38-50. London:

Kogan Page

Brown, L. (2004). Diversity: the challenge for higher education. Race, Ethnicity

and Education, Vol. 7/1, pp. 21-34.

Brown, R.B. & Glover, A. (2006) Doing Your Dissertation in Business and

Management. The Reality of Researching and Writing. London: Sage

Publications

Brutus, S. & Manoogian, S. (1997) The art of feedback . Leadership in Action,

Vol.17/3, pp. 8-10.

Buswell, J. & Matthews, N. (2004) Feedback on Feedback! Encouraging students

to use feedback: a University of Gloucestershire case study. Journal of

Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education Vol.3/1, pp. 61-72

Butler, D.L. & Winne, P.H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a

theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65/3, pp.

245-281.

Calabrese, R. L. (2006). The elements of an effective dissertation and thesis: A

step by step guide for getting it right guide for getting it right the first

time. the first time. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

http://www.dummies.com/search.html?query=Marty+Brounstein

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-


187

Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Camp, C.L., Gregory, J.K., Lachman, N., Chen, L.P., Juskewitch, J.E. &

Pawlina, W. (2010) Comparative efficacy of group and individual

feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student

professionalism. Mayo Medical School, Minnesota: American

Association of Anatomists.

Carson, J. & Nelson, G. 1996. ‗Chinese students‘ perceptions of ESL peer

response group interaction‘. Journal of Second Language Writing.

Vol. 5/1, pp. 1-9.

Carson, J. & Nelson, G. (1994) Writing groups: cross-cultural issues. Journal of

Second Language Writing, Vol. 3/1, pp. 17 – 30.

Castle, P., Incledon, V. & Waring, M. (2008). Enhancing feedback: The

development of a Criterion based marking template for students on a sport

degree programme. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism

Education, Vol. 7/1, pp. 89-98.

Charliepeu (2011) Group learning versus Individual work, retrieved 12 May 2013

from http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/group-learning-

versus-individual-work/

Charmaz, Kathy (1983) "The grounded theory method: An explication and

interpretation", in Contemporary field Research: A Collection of Readings,

Robert M. Emerson, ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 109-128.

Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia

programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33/4, pp.

449–460

Chenoweth, N. A. & Luppescu, S. (1993). Attitudes and preferences of ESL

students to error correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,

Vol. 6/1, pp. 79-87.

Cho, K. S. ( 2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness

of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts.

Written Communication, Vol. 23, pp. 260–294.

Clare, J. (2003). Writing a PhD Thesis. Dalam &. H. J. Clare., Writing

Research:Transforming data into text. London: Chrchill Linving stone.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Camp%20CL%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gregory%20JK%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lachman%20N%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Chen%20LP%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Juskewitch%20JE%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Pawlina%20W%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20213851

http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/

http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/group-learning-versus-individual-work/

http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/group-learning-%09versus-individual-

http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/group-learning-%09versus-individual-


188

Clare, Judith, and Hamilton, Helen (2003). Writing Research: Transforming Data

into Text. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

Coffin, C., Curry, M.J., Goodman., Hewings, A., Lillis, T.M. & Swann, J. (2003)

Teaching Academic Writing: A toolkit for higher education. London:

Routledge

Cohen, A.D. & Cavalcanti, M.C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and

student. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research insights for

the classroom. verbal report. Cambridge: CUP.

Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education. New Your:

Routledge

Connell, R. W. (1985). 'How to supervise a PhD'. Vestes Vol. 2, pp. 38-41.

Connole, H. (1993). ‗The research enterprise.‘ In Connole, H., Smith, J.,

Wiseman, R. (1993) (Eds). Research methodology 1: Issues and methods

in research. Study guide. Melbourne: Deakin University.

Connolly, P. (2004) Boys and Schooling in the Early, Routledge: Routledge

Falmer

Connors, K. & Asenavage, K. (1994) Peer response groups in ESL writing

classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language

Writing. Vol. 3/3, pp. 257-276

Connors, R.J. & Lunsford, A.A. (1993).Teachers‘ rhetorical comments on student

papers. College Composition and Communication, Vol. 44/2), pp. 200-223

Cooley, L. & Lewkowicz, J. (2003) Dissertation Writing in Practice, Turning

Ideas into. Hongkong: Hongkong University Press.

Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-By-Step

Approach. Los Angeles: Sage.

Cooper, L. W. ( 2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer

application classes. T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in Education)

Journal, Vol. 28/8, pp. 52–58.

Cooper, T. J., Baturo, A. R. & Harris, L. (1998) Scholarly writing in mathematics

and science Education higher degree courses, in: J. A. Malone, B. Atweh,

& J. R. Northfield (Eds) Research and Supervision in Mathematics and


189

Science Education, pp. 249-276. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).

Corbin, Juliet & Anselm Strauss (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research:

Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Publications.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners‘ errors. International Review of

Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, pp. 161-170.

Cornwall, M. G., Schmithals, F. & Jaques, D. (Eds.). (1977). What is project

orientation? An overview. In Proceedings of the Seminar on Project

Orientation in Higher Education, 1–16. University of Bremen,March

1976, University of London, Institute of Education.

Cowan, J. (2003). Assessment for learning – giving timely and effective

feedback‘. Exchange, Spring Vol. 4, pp. 21–22.

Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning.

Computers and Education, Vol. 30, pp. 237-247

Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective

PhD supervision. Canberra: AGPS

Dale, K. (2010). Providing Students with Effcetive Feedback. Academic

Leadership, The online Journal. Vol. 4/4.

Davies, A .(2003) Feed Back ... Feed Forward: Using Assessment to Boost

Literacy Learning Originally published in Primary Leadership. Vol.2 No.

3 Spring Issue (2000) p.53-55. Davinson, D. (1977). Theses and Dissertations as Information Sources. London:

Clive Bingley.

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. & Pary, O. (1999) Supervising the PhD: A Guide to

Success Buckingham: Open University Press.

Donnely, R. & Fitzmaurice, M. (n.d.) Resource Pack on Supervising Postgraduate

Students. Dublin Institute of Technology

Dragga, S.(1991).Responding to technical writing. Technical Writing Teacher,

Vol. 18/3, pp. 202-221.

Duke, S. (2001). E-mail: Essential in media relations, but no replacement for face-

to-face communication. Public Relations Quarterly, Vol. 46/4,


190

pp. 19-22.

Edlin, A. (2001). The Nature of Written Feedback: A study of postgraduate

lecturers’ Perspectives. A Thesis for Master Degree of Education.

New Zealand: Unitec.

Educators, A. ( 2011). Grammar & Vocabulary. D & B Mann Webmasters.

http://www.aussieeducator.org.au/images/auslogo.png.

Eggleston, J. & Delamont, S. (1983). Supervision of Students for Research

Degrees. Birmingham: ALBERA.

Elawar, M. C. & Corno. L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written

feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather

than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol .77/2, pp. 162-173.

Ellis, R. (2009). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT

Journal. Vol.63/2 April 2009

Ellis, R. A. & Calvo, R. A. (2004). Learning through discussions in blended

environments. Educational Media International, Vol. 41/3, pp. 263–274.

Ellis, R.S., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008) The effects of focussed and

unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language

context. System Vol. 36, pp. 353-371

Emerson, L.(2007) Ed. Writing Guidelines for Education Students. Australia:

Thomson

Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Engebretson, K., Smith, K., McLaughlin, D., Seibold, C. Teret, G., & Ryan, E.

(2008). The changing reality of research education in Australia and

implications for supervision: a review of the literature. Teaching inHigher

Education, 13(1) 1–15.

Evans, D. & Gruba, P. (2002). How to Write a Better Thesis. Victoria:

Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Fathman, A.K. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus

on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing

(pp. 178-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fazio, L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal

writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of


191

Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235-249.

Fedor, D. B. (1991). Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed

model and its implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources

Management, 9,73–120.

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the

short- and long-term effects of written error correction. Dalam K. H.

(Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. (pp.

81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D. (2003a). Responding to writing: Exploring second language writing.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 119–140).

Ferris, D. (2003b). Response to Student Writing: Implication for Second-

Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A

response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing,

Vol. 8, pp. 1–10.

Ferris, D. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most

serious Serious and frequent errors?. CATESOL Journal, Vol. 8/1,

pp. 41-62.

Ferris, D. & Hedgcock, J. S. (2004).Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose,

Process,and Practice (2 nd Ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ferris, D. & Roberts, B (2001). ‗Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How

Explicit Does It Need to Be?‘. Journal of Second Language Writing,

Vol.10, pp.161–184.

Fox, B. (1993). The human tutorial dialogue project: Issues in the design of

instructional systems. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice.

London: SAGE Publications.

Freedman, S. (1985). The Acquisition of written language. Response and

Revision. New Jersey: Ablex.

Frijda, N.H. (1986) The Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fullan, M. and Hargreaves, A. (1992). What’s Worth Fighting for in Your School?

http://www.google.co.id/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Nico+H.+Frijda%22


192

Working Together for Improvement. Beckenham: Open University Press.

pp 28–29.

Garcia, M.E., Malott, R.W.& Brethower, D. (1988). A system of

thesis and dissertationsupervision: Helping graduate students

succeed.Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 186–191

Gay, L. M. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies and Applications.

New Jersey: Pearson.

Gay, L.R., Mills, J.E., & Airasian, P.(2006). Educational Research: Competencies

and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson.

Glatthorn, A. A.& Joyner, R. L. (2005). Writing the Winning Theses or

Dissertation:A Step by Step Guide, California: Corwin Press.

Goldstein, L. (2006). 'Feedback and Revision in Second Language Writing:

Contextual, Teacher, and Student Variables'. Dalam K. a. Hyland,

Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 185–205). New York: CUP

Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990).‖ Student input and negotiation of meaning in

ESL writing conferences.‖ TESOL Quarterly, 24

Goodman, J. S., & Wood, R. E. (2004). Feedback specificity, learning

opportunities, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 809-

821.

Gottschalk, Katherine, & Hjortshoj, Keith. (2004). The elements of teaching

writing: A resource for instructors in all disciplines. Boston: Bedford/St.

Martin's.

Grabe, W. (2001). Notes towards a theory of second language writing (pp. 39-57)

New Jersey: Lawrernce Erlbbaum.

Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. The USA:

Longman.

Graduate School of Communication (2010). The Master‘s thesis and the role of

the tutor/thesis supervisor in the new Communication Science Master‘s

programme. University of Amsterdam

Grami, G. (2005). The Effect of Teachers Written Feedback on ESL Students

Perception: A Study A Saudi ESL University Context. Annual Review of

Education. Communication and Language Sciences. Volume 2, 2005


193

Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: subjectivity and supervision. Higher

Education Research and Development, Vol. 24 /2, pp. 151-163.

Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V.J. (1997a) Defining and describing the paradigm

issue in mixed method evaluation. New Direction for Evaluation,

Vol. 74, pp. 5-17

Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds) (1997b). Advances in mixed-method

evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms

(pp. 19-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E. & and Neale, M. A. (2003). "Virtualness and

Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle in Organizations,

Individuals, and Information Technology,". MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27/2.

Guffey, M. R. (2006). Business Commnunication: Process and Product. Toronto:

Nelson.

Guide on Thesis Supervision (2010-2011)Handbook for Research Postgraduate

Studies 2010-2011 Retrieved December 18,2010 from

www.ust.hk/vpaao/pg/rpghandbook/supervision/guide.html

Hairston, M. (1986). On not being a composition slave. In c.w. Bridges (ed.),

Training the new teacher of college composition, Urbana, Il: ncte.

Hann, M. A. (2004). Computer anxiety and students' preferred feedback methods

in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 88/3, pp. 403-415.

Hara, N. B. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied

educational psychology. Instructional Science, Vol. 28/2, pp. 115–152.

Harding, A. G. (1973). The objectives and structure of undergraduate projects.

British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 216–232.

Harman, G. (2002) Producing PhD Graduates in Australia for the Knowledge

Economy. Higher Education Research & Development,

Vol. 21/2, pp.180-190

Harris, M. (1986). Teaching one-to-one: The writing conference. National

Council of Teachers of English.

Hart, C. (2005). Doing your Masters Dissertation. Sage: London.

http://www.ust.hk/vpaao/pg/rpghandbook/supervision/guide.html


194

Harvard Writing Project Bulletin (2000). Responding to Student Writing. Boston:

The President and Fellows of Harvard College

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of

Educational Research, Vol. 77/1, pp. 81-101.

Hatziapostolou, T & Paraskakis, I. (2010) ―Enhancing the Impact of Formative

Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System‖

Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 8 Issue 2 2010, pp.111 - 122.

Hawkins & Shohet (2006) Supervision in the Helping Professions. Berkshire,

England: OUP

Haythornthwaite, C. & Kazmer,M.M. (2002) ―Bringing the Internet Home:

Adult Distance Learners and Their Internet, Home, and Work Worlds,‖ in

The Internet in Everyday Life, ed. Barry Wellman and Caroline

Haythornthwaite (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2002), pp. 431–463

Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision.

Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 21/1, pp. 41-53.

Hefferman, J. & Lincoln, J. (1996) Writing: a concise handbook. New York:

Norton.

Heift, T. & Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments:

A case study in French. Educational Technology & Society 3(3).

Heppner, P. P., & Handley, P. G. (1981). A study of the interpersonal influence

Process in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 28,

pp. 437-444.

Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. London:

Routledge.

Holmes, P. (2005). Ethnic Chinese students‘ communication with cultural others

in a New Zealand University. Communication Education, Vol. 54(4), pp.

289-311.

Holmes, L. & Smith, L. (2003) Student evaluation of faculty grading methods.

Journal of Education for Business, July/August 2003, Vol. pp. 318–323.

Holtom, D. & Fisher, E. (1999) Enjoy Writing your Thesis or Dissertation!

London: Imperial College Press


195

Horowitz, D. (1986). Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL

Quarterly, Vol. 20/1, pp. 141-154.

Hounsell, D. (2004). Reinventing feedback for the contemporary Scottish

university‘. Improving Feedback to Students Workshop. Glasgow:

available at www.enhancement themes.ac.uk/uploads/documents

/Hounsellpaper.doc

Hounsell, D. I. (1987). Essay writing and the quality of feedback, Student

Learning: research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton

Keynes: Open University Press.

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. EDUCAUSE

Quarterly, Vol. 31/4 (October–December 2008).

Hsu, C. (2009). Writing partnerships. Reading Teacher, Vol. 63/2, pp. 153-158.

Huang, R. (2006). ‗A challenging but worthwhile learning experience!‘ Asian

international student perspectives of undertaking a dissertation in the

UK. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education,

Vol. 6/1, pp. 29-38.

Huckin, T. (2006). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (ed.), Academic

Writing in Context. London : Continuum (pp. 93-103).

Hung, D., Tan, S. C. & Chen, D. T. (2005). How the Internet facilitates learning

as dialog: design considerations for online discussions. International

Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 32/1, pp. 37–46.

Hyatt, D. (2005). ‗Yes, a very good point!‘: A critical genre analysis of a corpus

of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments.

Teaching in Higher. Education, 10(3) , 339–353.

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers.

Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 7, pp. 255-286.

Hyland, Fiona & Hyland, Ken, (2001) Sugaring the pill Praise and criticism in

written Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 10,

pp. 185– 212

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic

http://www.enhancement/


196

Writing,. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, Vol. 44/4, pp.

294-304.

Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students‘

writing. Language Teaching Vol. 39, pp. 83–101.

Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.

Applied Linguistics, Vol. 25/2, 156–177.

Inoue, A. & Kubota, M. (1989) Error Treatment in a Japanese Language

Classroom. WPEL, Vol. 10/2

Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. New York:

Routledge. New York: Routledge.

Ivanic, R. C. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed

to students by tutors’ written comments. Student Writing in Higher

Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.

James, R. & Baldwin, G. (1999). Eleven practices of effective postgraduate

supervisors. The Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The

School of Graduate Studies, University of Melbourne. Retrieved May 15,

2007 from www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/11practices.pdf

Jannetti, Anthony J. (2005) Case and Grounded Theory As Qualitative Research

Methods. Retrieved 2 August 2012 from Users/TOSHIBA/Documents/

Dissertation, Draft 2012/Case and Grounded Theory As Qualitative

Research Methods-Science News-red.Orbit.htm

Jasmine, J. & Weiner, W. (2007). The effects of writing workshop on abilities of

first grade students to become confident and independent writers. Early

Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 35/2, pp. 131-139.

Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998) Dimentions of dialogue: Large classes in China.

International of Educational Research, Vol. 29, pp. 739-761.

Jinguji, M. (2008) The Importance of Feedback: Descriptive and Evaluative

Feedback Retrieved 12 november 2013 from www.innovations4pe.com

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and

http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/11practices.pdf

http://www.innovations4pe.com/


197

research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company

Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s

learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse

Jordan, J. (2004). The Use of Orally Recorded Exam Feedback as a Supplement to

Written Comments. Journal of Statistics Education. Vol.12/1.

Jorgensen, Danny L. (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human

Studies, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Juwah, C. (2004 ). Enhancing student learning through effective formative

feedback. The Higher Education Academy Generic Centre.

Kamler, B. & Thomson, P. (2006) Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies

for Supervision. Oxon: Routledge

Karim, M. Z. & Ivy, T. I. (2011 ). The Nature of Teacher Feedback in Second

Language (L2) Language Classrooms: A Study on Some private

universities in Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Assosiation of Young

Researchers. Vol. 1/1. pp.31- 48.

Kasanga, L. A. (2006). Students' Response to Peer andTeacher Feedback in a

First-Year Writing Course. . Qaboos: Department of English Language

and Literature, Sultan Qaboos University.

Kepner, C. G. (1991). An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written

Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills.

The Modern Language Journal, 75. Keyton, J. (2006 ) Communicating in Groups: Building Relationships for Effective

Decision Making, 2nd Ed. Oxford: OUP

King, J. (2011) Policy on Feedback. Aberdeen: School of Language and

Literature, Retrieved May 20, 2013 from http://www.abdn.ac.uk/feedback

/documents/Feedback/LL_feedback_policy.pdf

King, K. P. (2001). .Educators revitalize the classroom ―bulletin board‖: a case

study of the influence of online dialogue on face-to-face classes from an

adult learning perspective. Journal of Research on Computing in

Education, Vol. 33/4, pp. 337–354.

Kleuver, R. (1997). Students‘ attitudes towards the responsibilities and barriers in

doctoral study. New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 99, pp. 47-56.

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/feedback%20/documents/Feedback/LL_feedback_policy.pdf

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/feedback%20/documents/Feedback/LL_feedback_policy.pdf


198

Kluger, A.N. & Denisi, A. (1998) Feedback interventions on performance:

Towards the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions

in Psychological Science, 7, 67-72

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on

performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary

feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

Knafl, K. & Breitmayer, B. (1991). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of

conceptual clarity and purpose. Dalam J. M. (Ed)., Qualitative nursing

research: A contemporary dialogue (hal. pp. 226-239 ). London: Sage

Publishers.

Kohlbacher, F. (January 2006 ). The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case

Study Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Reserach. Vol. 7/1, pp.21-32 .

Kouritzin, S. G. (1999). Feedback on Feedback: Preservice ESLTeachers Respond

to Evaluation Practices. lESL Canada Journal, Vol. 17/1

Krebs, S. A., Hobman, E. V., & Bordia, P. (2006). Virtual teams and group

member dissimilarity. Small Group Research, Vol. 37/6, pp. 721-741.

Kumar, V. & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis.

Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 12/4, pp. 461-470

Kurt, G. &. Atay, Derin (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing

anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and

Practice in Education, Vol. pp.12-23. Lai, K. W. (2011). Using collaborative peer feedback and supervision to support.

Proceedings ascilite 2011. Dunedin, New Zealand: Centre for Distance

Education and Learning Technologies University of Otago College of

Education, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern

Language Journal, Vol. 66 , pp. 140-149.

Laske, S. & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). Frameworks for Postgraduate Research

and Supervision. Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.


199

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: a conversational

framework for the effective use of learning technologies,. London:

Routledge.

Lavery, J. J. (1964). Retention of a skill following training with and without

instructions to retain. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 275-281.

Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998). ‗Student writing in higher education: an academic

literacies approach‘. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 23/3, pp. 329–338.

Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary

classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 17, pp. 144–164.

Leithwood, K. J. (1998). ‗Leadership and other conditions which foster

organizational learning in schools‘. Dalam K. L. (eds), Organizational

Learning in Schools. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response in Second

Language Writing. in B. Kroll, Research Insights for the Classroom (pp.

(57-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leo, S. (2013) Kiat Jitu Menulis Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi, Jakarta: Erlangga

Leo, S. (2010) Kiat Jitu Menulis dan Menerbitkan Buku, Jakarta: Erlangga

Leo. S., Groth, C., Yugianingrum., Lilyana, S., Kendra, I.L. & Lukman, E.A

(2007) English for Academic Purposes: Essay Writing. Yogyakarta:

AndiOffset

Lepper, M.R. & R.W. Chabay (1988). Socializing the intelligent tutor: Bringing

empathy to computer tutors. In Mandl and Lesgold (Eds.), Learning

Issues for Intelligent. Tutoring Systems, Springer. pp. 114-137.

Lightbown, P.M. & N. Spada. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford:

Oxford University Press

Lim, C. P. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration

in Singapore schools: orienting activities and learner autonomy.

Computers & Education, pp. 43/3, pp. 215–236.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA:

Sage.

Lind, M. R. (1999). The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE


200

Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 42/4, pp. 276-287

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. (Edisi Kedua). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Liu, J. & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic

versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic

Purposes, Vol. 2, pp.193–227.

Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic

organization. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 23, pp. 280-302.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., & d‘Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual

learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational

Research, Vol. 71/3, pp. 449-521.

MA Programme Director (2008). Guidelines for Supervisors and Supervisees

Economics Postgraduate, retrieved24 October 2010 from www.

socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/.../dissertation/.../Guidelines_001.doc

Machi, L. (2009). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand Oaks,

California: Corwin Press.

Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors

andstudents. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Assessment

and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 26/4, pp. 307 -318 Magill, R. A. (1993). Augmented feedback in skill acquisition. In R. N. Singer,

M. Murphy, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport

psychology (pp. 193-212). New York: Macmillan.

Magney, J. (1997). Working and learning together. Techniques, Vol. 72/6,

pp. 57-58.

Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative

environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 15/2,

pp. 129-138.

Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L. & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online

discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. Educational

Technology Research and Development, Vol. 52/2, pp. 23–40.

Matsumura, S. & Hann, G. (2004) Computer anxiety and students' preferred

feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal,

Vol. 88(3), pp.403-415.


201

Mauch, J. & Park, N. (2003). Guide to successful thesis and dissertation: A

handbook for students and faculty, 5th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.

McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A. & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and

context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for

synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 20,

pp. 194-204

McColskey, W., & Leary, M. R. (1985). Differential effects of norm-referenced

and self-referenced feedback on performance expectancies, attribution, and

motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 275–284.

McClure, J. W. (2005). Preparing a Laboratory-based Thesis: Chinese

International Research Students‘ Experiences of Supervision. Teaching in

Higher Education,Vol. 10/1, pp. 3-16.

McLeod, L. P., Baron, R. S., Weighner Marti, M., & Kuh Yoon, M. (1997) The

eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated

group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82/5, pp.706-718.

Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: the role of time

and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,

Vol. 7/3, pp. 55–65.

Mills, C. & Matthews, N. (2009) Review of tutor feedback during

undergraduate dissertations: A case study Journal of Hospitality, Leisure,

Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 8/1, pp. 108 – 116

Morrison, J. L., Oladunjoye, G. T. & Onyefulu, C. (2007). An Assessment of

Research Supervision: A Leadership Model Enhancing Current Practices

in Business and Management . Journal of Education for Business, March/

April, Vol. pp. 212-219.

Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become

independent writers. Dalam K. H. (Eds.), Feedback in second language

writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 123-139). New York: Cambridge

University Press.

MLA Citation (2013) "Collaborative Leanrning And Architecture Education."

123HelpMe.com. Retrived 20 May 2013 from

<http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=33731>.

Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: a collaborative design model.


202

Educational. Technology Research and Development, Vol. 51/4,

pp. 85–103.

Moore, J. D. (2004). Generating Tutorial Feedback with Affect. American

Association for Artificial Intelligence. Vol. pp.923-928.

Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of

explanatory versus. corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia.

Instructional Science, Vol. 32, pp. 99–113.

Moriarti, M. (1997). Teaching Multicultured Students. London: John and Bartlett

Publishers International.

Morrison, J. L., Oladunjoye, G. T. & Onyefulu, C. (2007). An Assessment of

Research Supervision: A Leadership Model Enhancing Current Practices

in Business and Management . Journal of Education for Business, March/

April, Vol 2, pp. 212-219.

Moses, I. (1985). Supervising postgraduates. Kensington, NSW: Higher

Education Research and Development Society of Australia.

Murray, D.M. (2002) How to Write a Thesis. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open

University Press

Murray, H. (1985). Qassroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching

effectiveness. Dalam J.G.Donald&A.M. Sullivan (Eds.), in Using

researchto improve teaching. (pp. 21-34). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the Feedback: Sociocultural Interpretation of

Saudi ESL Learners‘ Opinions about Writing Feedback. English

Language Teaching. Vol. 5/3

Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning

in Higher Education, Vol. 4/1, pp. 24-38.

Nah, W. (2008). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Written and Spoken

Communication. http://communicatebetter.blogspot.com/2008/11/

advatages-and-disadvantages-of-written.html.

Naidu, M. (2007). The use of written feedback and conferencing in improving

students’ writing. Malaysia: Faculty of Management and Human

Resource Development.

Nathan, M. J. (2000). Moving beyond teachers‘ intuitive beliefs about algebra

learning. Mathematics Teacher, Vol. 93, pp. 218–223.

http://communicatebetter.blogspot.com/2008/11/%20advatages-and-disadvantages-of-

http://communicatebetter.blogspot.com/2008/11/%20advatages-and-disadvantages-of-


203

Nelson, G. & Carsen, J. (1998). ESL Students perception of effectiveness in

peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 7,

pp. 113-131.

Nelson, G. & Murphy, J.M. (1993) Peer response group: DO L2 writers use peer

comments in reveisng their drafts? Tesol Quorterly, Vol. 27/1,

pp.135-141.

Nelson and Schunn (2009). The nature of feedback: how different. Instr Sci, Vol.

8 pp. 375–401.

Newman, D. R., Webb, B. & Cochrane, C. (1996). A content analysis method to measure Critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Retrieved on 10 January 2012 from

http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html

Nicol, D. (2008). Redesigning written feedback to students when class sizes are

large. Paper for the 33rd Improving University Teaching Conference,

Transforming higher education and learning in the 21st century. Improving

University Teaching Conference, Transforming higher. Glassgow,

Scotland: Unversity of Strathclyde.

Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick. D. (2006) Formative assessment and self-

regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback

practice. Studies in Higher Education (2006), Vol. 31/2, pp. 199-218

Nicol, David & Macfarlane-Dick, Debra Dick (2004) "Rethinking Formative

Assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good

feedback practice" http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/

ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc

Nik, Y. A., Sani, Badariah. Bt. M., Chik, B. W., Jusoff , K. & Hasbollah, Hasif,

R. B. (2010) The writing performance of undergraduates in the

University of Technology, Mara. Terengganu, Malaysia. Journal of

Languages and Culture. Vol. 1/1, pp. 7–13.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

O‘Brien, R., & Sparshatt, L. (2007). Mind the gap! Staff perceptions of students’

perceptionof assessment feedback. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/events/conference/papers

Oliver, P. (2004). Writing your thesis. London: Sage publications.

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/%20ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/%20ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/events/conference/papers


204

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (1999). Academic English.(3rd ed.). New York:

Longman.

Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. ( 2007) Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second

Language. A Handbook for Supervisors. London: Roultledge.

Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of

students‘ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing

instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research,

Vol. 1/2, pp. 124-152

Patton, E. & Appelbaum, S.H. (2003). The Case for Case Studies in

Management Research. Management Research News [online], 26(5),

pp. 60-71. Accessed: 5 February 2012 from

http://www.emeraldinsight.com.

Pearce, L. (2005). How to examine a thesis. . Berkshire, England: Society for

Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002) Research Training and Supervision. Studies in

Higher Education, Vol. 27/2, pp. 135-150

Pelligrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N. & Glaser, R. (eds) (2001) Knowing what

Students Know – The Science and Design of Educational Assessment,

Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Peterson, S. (2010). Improving Student Writing Using Feedback as a Teaching

Tool. Toronto: OISE/University of Toronto.

Peterson, S. (2003). Peer influences on students‘ revisions of their narrative

writing. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, Vol. 30,

pp. 239–272.

Peterson, S., & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and providing feedback for student

writing in Canadian classrooms. Assessing Writing, Vol. 15/2.

Peterson, S. (2003). Peer influences on students‘ revisions of their narrative

writing. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 30, 239–272.

Pinnell, G. & Fountas, I. (1998) Word Matters. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the

college classroom, Dalam J. C. (Eds), Higher Education: Handbook of

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/


205

Theory and Research, Volume XVII. New York: Agathon Press.

Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Polanyi, M. ( 2002). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.

London: Routledge.

Polio, C., Fleck, C. & Leder, N. (1998) If I only had more time: ESL learners‘

changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second

Language Writing, Vol. 7, pp. 43-68

Palomba, C & Banta, T. (1999). Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing,

and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco:

Jossey Bass.

Potter, J. (1994). Common Business English Errors in Hong Kong. Hong Kong:

Longman.

Pridemore, D. R. (1995). Control of practice and level of feedback in computer-

based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 20,

pp. 444–450.

Primethesis, C. (2009). Tips in Thesis Writing. Retrieved 16 january 2012

http://primethesis.com/blog/tips-in-thesis-writing/.

Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinary: A sociohistoric account of literate

activity in the academy. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum. Prystowsky, J.B. & DaRosa, D.A. (2003). Learning Prescription Permits

Feedback on Feedback, The American Journal of Surgery. Vol. 185.

pp. 264-267 .

Race, P. (2001). Using feeedback to help students learn. The Higher Education

Academy http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/

detail/id432_using_feedback

Radecki, P. M. & Swales, J.M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments

on their written work. System, Vol. pp. 355-365.

Rait, E. (1995). ‗Against the current: organizational learning in schools‘. In S. B.

Bacharach & B. Mundell (Eds), Images of Schools: structures and roles in

organizational behavior. London: Sage.

http://primethesis.com/blog/tips-in-thesis-

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/%20%09detail/id432

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/%20%09detail/id432


206

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in Higher Education(2nd ed.). London:

Routledge Falmer.

Ray, S. (2007), Selecting a Doctoral Dissertation Supervisor: Analytical

Hierarchy Approach to theMultiple Criteria Problem, International

Journal of Doctoral Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 23-32

Reesor, M. (2002). Issues in written teacher feedback: A critical review. The

English Teacher. Vol. 5, pp. 242-255.

Reid, J. (1998). The Process of Composition . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents Hall.

Rezael, S. ( 2011). Corrective Feedback in Task-based Grammar Instruction: A

Case of Recast vs. Metalinguistic Feedback. Lambert : Lap Lambert

Academic Publishing.

Rhodes, L. & Dudley-Marling, C. (1996). Readers and writers with a difference:

A holistic approach to teaching struggling readers and writers (2nd ed.).

Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Rickards, D. & Hawes, S. (2006) Connecting Reading and Writing Through

Author's Craft The Reading Teacher.Vol. 60/4, pp. 370–373.

Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I.(1986). Salience of feedback on error and its

effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp. 83–93.

Rollinson, P. (1998). ‘Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: A case

study. Madrid: Unpublished PhD thesis. Universidad Autonoma de

Madrid.

Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge

sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 36/3, pp. 259-273.

Rowe, A.D. & Wood, L.N. (2006). What feedback do students want? Sydney,

Australia : Macquarie University.

Rubel, C. & Wallace, M. (2010). Instructor Tone in Written Communication: Are

We Saying What We Want Them to Hear?. In Proceedings of TCC – Teaching Colleges and Community Worldwide Online Conference 2010

(pp. 1-15). Retrieved November 22, 2013 from

http://www.editlib.org/p/43755.

http://www.editlib.org/p/43755


207

Rudestam, K.E. & Newton, R.R. (1992) Surviving Your Dissertation. London:

Sage Pblications

Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in

Education: Principles, Policy and Practice Vol. 5/1, no.77-84.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional

systems. Instructional Science. Vol. 18, pp. 119-144. .

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers‘ practices and students‘ preferences for feedback on

second language writing: A case study of Adult ESL learners. TESL

Canada Journal, Vol.11/2, pp. 46-70.

Salager-Meyer, F. ( 1990). Discoursal flaws in Medical English Abstract: A Genre

Analysis per Research and Text Type. Text. Vol. 10/4, pp. 365-384.

Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A, & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowl- edge of results

and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological

Bulletin, 95, 355-386.

Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting ‘The Culture of the School and the Problem of

Change’. New York: Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994) Self-

regulation of learning and performance: issuesand educational

applications.(New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994) Self-regulation of learning and

performance: Issues and educational applications. New Jersey: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates.

Schunk, D. I. (989). ‗Self efficacy and cognitive skill learning‘. Research on

Motivation in Education, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp. 13–44.

Schwartz, F. & White, K. (2000). Making sense of it all: Giving and getting

online course feedback. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online

teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies, and techniques for

the virtual classroom (pp. 57–72). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Seagram B., Gould, J. & Pyke, S. (1998). An Investigation of Gender and Other

Variableson Time to Completion of Doctoral Degrees. Research in

Higher Education, Vol. 39/3, pp. 319-335.

Seifert, C. M., & Hutchins, E. L. (1992). Error as opportunity: Learning in a

cooperative task. Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 7/4, pp. 409-435.

Shannon, A. G. (1995). Research degree supervision: more mentor than master.


208

Australian Universities’ Review, Vol. 38/2, pp. 12-15.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and

language aptitude on ESL learners‘ acquisition of articles. TESOL

Quarterly, 41, 255-283.

Sheppard, K. ( 1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC

Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 103–110.

Shetzer, H. & Warschauer, M. (2000) An electronic literacy approach to

network-based language teaching. Dalam M. A. Warschauer, Network-

based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Shute, V. J. ( 2007). Focus on Formative Feedback. Princenton, NJ: Educational

Testing Services.

Shute, V. J. (2006). Assessments for learning: Great idea, but do they work?.

Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational

Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Shute, V. J., Woltz,. San

Francisco, the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco

Simpson, J. M. (2006). Feedback on Writing: Changing EFL Students‘ Attitudes.

TESL Canada Journal, Vol. 24/1, Winter 2006 .

Sims, R. (2003). Promises of Interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and

expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance


Sivyer, D. L. (2005). "The Effect of Positive/Negative Feedback Awareness on

Self-Efficacy and Writing Performance". . Electronic Theses, Treatises

and Dissertations.

Slavin, R., Leavey, M. & Madden, N. (1984). Combining cooperative learning

and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics

achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, Vol. 84,

pp. 409–422.

Smith, K. H. (1972) Changes in group structure through individual and group

feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 24/3),

Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher


209

responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication,

Vol. 48, pp. 249–268.

Smith, S. (2003a). The role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing

Teachers' Evaluations of Students' Writing. Written Communication,

Vol. 20/1, pp. 37-80.

Smith, S. (2003b). What is "Good" Technical communication? A comparison of

the standards Of writing and engineering instructors. Technical

Communication Quarterly, Vol. 12/1, pp. 7 - 24.

Sokmen, A. (1988). Taking advantage of conference-centered writing. TESOL

Newsletter, Vol. 22/1, pp.5-17.

Sorenson, S. (2010). Webster’s Newworld, Student Writing Handbook. Canada:

Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Sperling, M. (1990). I want to talk to each of you: Collaboration and the teacher

student writing conference. Research in the Teaching ofEnglish, Vol. 24/3,

pp. 279-321.

Stake, E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stake, E. (1985). ‗Case study.‘ In Nisbet, J., Mergary, J., and Nisbet, S. (1985).

(Eds). World yearbook of education 1985. Research, policy and politics.

London: Nicholas Publishing Company.

Stake, Robert. (1998). ―Case Studies‖ in: Norman Denzin & Yvonna Lincoln.

(eds.): Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, London, New

Delhi: Sage.

Stanley, J. (1992). ‗Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators‘.

Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 1/3, pp. 217-33.

Steel, Kimberly (2007) Definition for Writing Conventions. Retrieved 23 June

2011, Last updated 14 November 2007 from kimskorner4teachertalk.com.

Storper, M. & Venables, A.J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban

economy. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 4, pp.351-370.

STPB (2012) Buku Panduan Penyusunan Skripsi Program Strata -1 Bandung:

STPB Sturridge, P. (2007). The National Student Survey 2006 Summary Report. London:

HEFCE.


210

Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B. (1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students:

Essential Taks and Skilss. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Symons, M. (2001). Learning Assistance: Enhancing the PhD Experience. in

A. Bartlett & G. Mercer (eds.), Postgraduate research supervision

(pp. 101-112). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.

Tardy, C. M. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A

comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 15/2, pp. 79-101.

Tarras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment.

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 27, pp. 501-510.

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods

research: From Data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A.

Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and

behavioural research (pp. 671–701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Taylor, S. & Beasley, N. (2005). A Handbook for doctoral supervisors. London:

Routledge.

Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report, Vol 3/2,

July 1997.

Thalheimer, W. (2008 ). Providing Learners with Feedback—Part 2: Peer-

reviewed research compiled for training, education, and e-learning.

Retrieved November 31, 2003, from http://www.work-learning.com/catalog/

Thalheimer, W. (2006). Spacing Learning Events Over Time: What the Research

Says. Retrieved January 9, 2003, from http://www.work-

learning.com/catalog/.

Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: sage Publications.

Thomas, S. (2000). How to Write Health Science Paperes, Dissertation and

Thesis. London: Harcourt Publishers Ltd. Tiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages

compared to Face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational

Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 9/4, pp. 371–384.

Toner, K. et al. (2012) The Impact of Individual and Group Feedback on

http://www.work-learning.com/catalog/

http://www.work-/

http://eab.sagepub.com/search?author1=Kaitlin+Toner&sortspec=date&submit=Submit


211

Environmental Intentions and Self-Beliefs. Environment and Behavior, August 1, 2012

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes.

Language Learning, Vol. 46, pp. 327-369.

Tseng, S. & Tsai, C.C. (2006). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer

feedback: A study of high school computer course. Journal of the Chinese

Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 23, pp. 262-267.

Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative

assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 22,

pp. 389-404.

University, D. (2009). The Literature Review. Victoria, Autralia: Geelong,

Victoria, Australia.

University, W. M. (2009). Writer's Handbook: Common Writing Assignments:

Review of Literature. Wisconsin, Madison: Wisconsin-Madison Writing

Center.

Vasquez, J.A. (1993). The War Puzzle: Cambridge Studies in International

Relations:Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Vilkinas, T. (2002). The PhD process: The supervisor as manager. Education and

Training, Vol. 44/3, pp. 129-137.

Villamil, O.S. and Guerrero, M.C.M. (1996). ‗Peer revisions in the L2 classroom:

social cognitif activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social

behaviour‘. Journal of Second Language Writin, Vol. 5/1, pp. 51-75.

Vollmeyer, R. and Rheinberg, F. (2005). Surprising Effect of Feedback on

Learning. Learning and Instruction. Vol. 15. pp. 589- 602.

Wang, Q. & Woo, H. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions

and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of

Educational Technology Vol 38 No 2. Wang, T. & Li, L. Y. (2011). ‗Tell me what to do‘ vs. ‗guide me through it‘:

Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning Vol. 12/2, pp. 101-112.

Wang, T. & Li, L. (2009) International research students‘ experiences of

feedback, in The Student Experience, Proceedings of the 32nd

http://alh.sagepub.com/search?author1=+Ting+Wang&sortspec=date&submit=Submit

http://alh.sagepub.com/search?author1=Linda+Y.+Li&sortspec=date&submit=Submit


212

HERDSA Annual Conference, Darwin, 6-9 July 2009: pp 444-452.

Ware, P. D. & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language

writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland, (Eds.) Feedback in second anguage

lwriting: Contexts and issues (pp. 1-20). New York: Cambridge.

Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological

assumptions in research on educational dialogue. research on educational

dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34/3, pp. 347-361.

Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eds.

Wisker, G., Exley, K., Antoniou, M. & Ridley, P. (2008), Working one-to-one

with students: supervising, coaching, mentoring, and personal tutoring.

London: Routledge.

Wong-Kam, J. & Vasquez, V. (2003). Writing today: Between the ideal and the

real world of teaching. School Talk, Vol. 9/1, pp. 1-7.

Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976).The role of tutoring in problem

solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. Vol. 17, pp. 89-100.

Wright, J. & Lodwick, R. (1989). The process of the PhD: A study of the first

year of doctoral study. Research Papers in Education, Vol. 4, pp. 22–56

Yin, R. K. (2002) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills:

Sage Publication.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Applied Social Research

Series, Vol. 34. London: Sage.

Yorke, M. (2003). ‗Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards

theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice‘. Higher Education,

Vol. 45, pp. 477–501.

Young, K., Fogarty, M. P. & McRea, S. (1987). The management of doctoral

studies in the social sciences. London, England: PSI.

Youyan (2013) Using Feedback to Enhance Learning, SingTeach, Education

Research for Teachers, retrieved 7 August 2013 from singteach.nie.edu.sg.


213

Zainal, Z.(2007)‖ Case study as a research method‖, Journal of Jurnal

Kemanusiaan, Vol.9, No. January, pp.1-6.

Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19/1,

pp. 79-101.

Zelditch, M. (1990). Mentor roles. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the

Western Association of Graduate Schools. Cited in Powell, R. C. & Pivo,

G. (2001), Mentoring: The faculty-graduate student relationship. Tucson,

AZ: University of Arizona.

Zhang, S. (1995). RE-examining the effcetive avantages of peer feedback in the

ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 4/3, pp.

209-222 .

Zhao, F. (2002) Transforming Quality in Research Supervision: A Knowledge

Management Approach. School of Management, Business

Faculty, RMIT University Melbourne

Zhao, C. G. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor

behaviour affect student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher


Zhu, C. (2001) ‗Supervision on Officials Must Tighten‘. Retrieved December 12,

2010 from http:/www.china.org.cn/english/14230.htm

Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunk, D.H. (2001) Self-regulated learning and academic

achievement:theoretical perspectives. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunk, D.H. (2004) Self-regulating intellectual processes

and outcomes: a social cognitive perspective, in D. Y. Dai & R. J.

Sternberg (Eds) Motivation, emotion and cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates