AP-42 Section Number: 9.1 1.1

Reference Number: 18

Title: Vegetable Oil Production (Meal Processing) Emission Test Report, Ralston Purina Company, Memphis, Tennessee

PEDCo Environmental Inc.

PEDCo Environmental Inc.

August 1979

I &PA I I )I I I I I I I

United States Office of Air Quality EMB Repon 79-VEG-6d Environmental Protection Planning and Standards ABency Research Triangle Park NC 2771 1

Ai.

AP42 Section Reference _Le Vegetable Oil Production ReportSect. (Meal Processing) Reference -

Emission Test Report Ralston Purina Company Memphis, Tennessee

I

I 'I (&Em I I I I I. I I I 1

United States Office of Air Quality EM5 Report 79-VEG-6d Environmental Protection Planning and Standards &encv Research Triangle Park NC 2771 1

Vegetable Oil Production (Meal Processing)

Emission Test Report Ralston Purina Company Memphis, Tennessee

i l

I a I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I .

ESTER TOWERS

PEDCo ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1 1498 CHESTER ROAD

CINCINNATI. OHIO 45246 (51 3) 782-4700

TELEX I31 3) 782-4807

VEGETABLE OIL EXTRACTION PLANT MEAL SAMPLING AND OPACITY TEST

RALSTON -PURINA MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

AUGUST 8, --1979

Prepared by:

PEDCo Environmental, Inc. 11499 Chester Road

Cincinnati, Ohio 45246

79-VEG-6D Contract No. 68-02-2811

Task No. 19

PN 3333-S

Project Technical Manager: Nancy McLaughlin

U . S . Environmental Protection Agency Emission Measurement Branch

BRANCH OFFICES

DALUS. T U A S COLUMBUS. OHIO

KANSAS C m . MISSOURI DURUAM. NORIU CAROLINA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2.1 Meal Samples 2.2 Opacity

3. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

I APPENDICES A Meal Sampling Log B Meal Samples Laboratory Analysis Report C Opacity Field Data Sheets

Page

1

2 2 2

5

A - 1 B-1 c-1

ii

I:

i !

1 L

I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

c o./- As part of the program to gather emissions data €-em the

vegetable oil industry, on August 0 , 1979 personnel from PEDCo

Environmental, Inc. and Research Triangle Institute conducted a

survey at the Ralston Purina vegetable oil extraction plant in

Memphis, Tennessee. The purpose of this visit was to collect

meal samples (to be analyzed for hexane content), monitor process

conditions, and check selected sites for visible emissions. Meal

samples and stack opacity readings were taken by personnel from

PEDCo Environmental Inc. Research Triangle Institute personnel eA mon tor process conditions.

Ralston Purina processes soybean meal for both human con-

sumption and animal feed. Samples of both &ma-1 products were

taken. Meal samples were collected in triplicate every hour for

a seven hour period at the following points:

s.vpci 0.' , - * ' ? ., i

1. After the Desolventizer-toaster (D T )

2. After the meal dryer (A.D.)

3 . After the stripper

4 . Final edible product

5. Final meal product

Stack opacity was read at eight different sites in the plant.

I

I

/I

II

I r I

I I! i,

SECTION 2

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

2.1 MEAL SAMPLES

Hexane concentration in the meal was determined on both a

wet meal and dry meal basis. The dry weight of the meal was

determined by placing the sample in a drying oven after analysis

and reweighing the sample after the moisture and hexane had been

driven o f f .

Table 1 presents the average hexane concentration of all

b I I I I I I

samples taken at each site. At each of the sites, hexane con-

centration remained fairly constant through the sampling period.

The average change in hexane concentration from wet meal to dry

meal basis was 25 percent for the D T samples, 1 5 percent at

the dryer, 11 percent at the stripper, 11 percent in the final

edible product, and 17 percent in the final meal.

The laboratory analysis report showing the concentrations,

sample weights, and the dates of analysis for each of the

samples taken is in Appendix B of this report. Meal sampling

log sheets are in Appendix A.

2 . 2 STACK OPACITY

Stack opacity was read by a qualified observer according to

the procedures of Method 9 of the Federal Register* at the

I

I I I I

I! I

3 TABLE 1 . AVERAGE^ H E X A N E C O N T E N T OF MEAL

I Hexane concent ra t ion Wet meal Dry meal

Sample type M I 9 uglg

O T b 0 416 44- 557 J Dryer 12,)

Final meal pi) 177 178 212 J

248 J 292 273

S t r i p p e r (31) 502 4% 566 Jqo Final Edible (2.0) 240 22b 271 2:6

Average of a l l samples taken . D T - Desolvent izer -Toas te r .

a

c

I I I

fo l lowing s i tes :

F a c i l i t y

Meal g r ind ing

Dehul l ing - e a s t s tack

Dehul l ing - w e s t s t a c k

Ground h u l l s

Flake load ing

Meal l oad ing

S t r i p p e r

H u l l b in

Type of C o n t r o l Device

Baghouse

Cyclone

Cyclone

Micro bag f i l t e r

R-J bag f i l t e r

R-J bag f i l t e r

Bag f i l t e r

Cyclone

A t t h e m e a l g r i n d i n g f a c i l i t y o p a c i t y ranged from 0 t o 5

p e r c e n t wi th a n average of 0 . 9 pe rcen t . Opaci ty a t bo th de l iu l l ing

s i tes ranged from 0 t o 1 5 pe rcen t w i th an average o p a c i t y of 1 . 9

p e r c e n t a t t h e e a s t stack and 1 . 2 p e r c e n t a t t h e w e s t s t a c k .

The h u l l b i n s i t e had o p a c i t y r ang ing from 5 t o 1 0 p e r c e n t

w i th a n average o p a c i t y of 6 . 7 p e r c e n t . Other s i tes showed no

v i s i b l e emissions. A l l f i e l d d a t a s h e e t s from o p a c i t y r ead ings

a r e i n Appendix C o f t h i s r e p o r t .

1

4

v I 1 I I I I I I t 1 I I I I I I I

3.1 MEAL SAMPLES

The meal sampling and analytical technique was adopted from

a volitilization head-space sampling procedure developed at Texas

A&M University.'

bottles with septum caps, tare weighed in the lab with two layers

of filter paper in the bottom of each. In the field just prior

to sampling, 0.5 mf. of water was added to wet the filter paper,

using an automatic pipette. A long handled scoop was used to

take a sample from the conveyor belt. A small portion of this

scoop was then transferred to each of the triplicate samples

using a small spoon and a funnel. Septum caps were replaced

immediately on the samples. An aluminum cap was then crimped

tightly over the septum for a final seal. Each bottle was then

weighed to determine the amount of sample collected.

were stored in a cooler with ice for shipment back to the PEDCo

laboratory and stored in a refrigerator until analysis.

Sample bottles used were 100 mh? glass serum

Meal samples

Ideally ----, i _ _ ..

Analysis was done by placing the sample bottle into a sand-

bath for two hours at 125'C and then gradually cooling the sample

to room temperature. A 1.0 mll head space sample is then injected

into a gas chromatograph. Calibration standards are made by

adding a known amount of 99 mole Percent n-hexane to processed

meal that has been completely dried. To determine the dry weight

of the meal sampled after analysis, the samples were placed in a

drying oven uncapped and reweighed after the moisture and hexane

had been driven off.

3 . 2 OPACITY READINGS

Opacity was read by a qualified observer using the procedures

of Federal Register* Method 9. Readings were taken every 15

seconds -in&-e periods at each site. 4>+ 4Y.o G 1 1 1 ..c.-'c

-37 d/9 /io e n ? L>L-f 12 I

*Federal Register, V o l . e, No. 16, -*~24.u.

6

I I

r I I I I i

I 'I I I I I I I I I

PEDCO ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 114@@CHESTERROAD

CINCINNATI. OHIO 45246 IS 13) 782-4700

TELEX IS1 3) 7824807

VEGETABLE OIL EXTRACTION PLANT MEAL SAMPLING AND OPACITY TEST

RALSTON-PURINA MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE

AUGUST.%; -1979

Prepared by:

PEDCO Environmental, Inc. 11499 Chester Road

Cincinnati, Ohio 45246

79-VEG-6D Contract No. 68-02-2811

Task No. 19

PN 3333-S

Project Technical Manager: Nancy McLaughlin

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Emission Measurement Branch

BRANCH OFFICES I I COLUMBUS. OHIO

DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA

DALLAS. TEXAS

KANS4S CITI. MISSOURI CHESTER TOWERS

.I. I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2.1 Meal Samples 2.2 Opacity

3. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

APPENDICES A Meal Sampling Log B Meal Samples Laboratory Analysis Report C Opacity Field Data Sheets

ii

1

2 2 2

5

A - 1 B-1 c-1

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

CCM As part of the program to gather emissions data f i e m the

vegetable oil industry, on August 8, 1979 personnel from PEDCO

Environmental, Inc. and Research Triangle Institute conducted a

survey at the Ralston Purina vegetable oil extraction plant in

Memphis, Tennessee. The purpose of this visit was to collect

meal samples (to be analyzed for hexane content), monitor process

conditions, and check selected sites for visible emissions. Meal

samples and stack opacity readings were taken by personnel from

PEDCo Environmental, 'Inc. Research Triangle Institute personnel ed monitor process conditions.

Ralston Purina processes soybean meal for both human con-

sumption and animal feed. Samples of both !%w?l products were

taken. Meal samples were collected in triplicate every hour for

a seven hour period at the following points:

f y p c . l D C v r ? C . d I

1. After the Desolventizer-toaster (D T )

2. After the meal dryer (A.D.)

3 . After the stripper

4 . Final edible product

5. Final meal product

Stack opacity was read at eight different sites in the plant.

1

SECTION 2

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

2 . 1 MEAL SAMPLES

Hexane c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n t h e meal was determined o n bo th a

w e t meal and d r y meal b a s i s . The d r y weight of t h e meal w a s

determined by p l a c i n g t h e sample i n a d ry ing oven a f t e r a n a l y s i s

and reweighing t h e sample a f t e r t h e mois ture and hexane had been

d r i v e n o f f .

Table 1 p r e s e n t s t h e average hexane c o n c e n t r a t i o n of a l l

samples taken a t each s i t e . A t each o f t h e s i tes , hexane con-

c e n t r a t i o n remained f a i r l y c o n s t a n t through t h e sampling pe r iod .

The average change i n hexane c o n c e n t r a t i o n from w e t meal t o d r y

meal b a s i s was 25 p e r c e n t f o r t h e D T sample's , 15 p e r c e n t a t

t h e d r y e r , 11 p e r c e n t a t t h e s t r i p p e r , 11 p e r c e n t i n t h e f i n a l

e d i b l e product , and 1 7 p e r c e n t i n t h e f i n a l meal.

The l a b o r a t o r y a n a l y s i s r e p o r t showing t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s ,

sample weights , and t h e d a t e s o f a n a l y s i s for each of t h e

samples taken i s i n Appendix B of t h i s r e p o r t . Meal sampling

l o g s h e e t s are i n Appendix A.

2 . 2 STACK OPACITY

Stack o p a c i t y w a s read by a q u a l i f i e d obse rve r accord ing t o

.t.he procedures of Method 9 o f t h e F e d e r a l Reg i s t e r* a t t h e A I

Federa l R e g i s t e r , VOl. &F, NO. H, 1 0 7 0 7

2 3 9

TABLE 1. AVERAGE^ HEXANE CONTENT OF MEAL

Sample t ype

. D T b c2 ’) Dryer @I)

S t r i p p e r @\’,

F i n a l E d i b l e (30)

F i n a l meal ed

Hexane concent ra t ion

Wet meal ug/g

416 4& .

248 J

502 4% 240 226 177 178

a Average o f a l l samples taken.

D T - Desolvent izer-Toaster.

I I I I

3

Dry meal l J d 9

557 J 292 %73

566

271 2s6 212 J

fo l lowing sites:

F a c i l i t y

Meal g r ind ing

Dehul l ing - e a s t s t a c k

Dehul l ing - w e s t s t a c k

Ground h u l l s

Flake load ing

Meal l oad ing

S t r i p p e r

H u l l b i n

Type of C o n t r o l Device

Baghouse

Cyclone

Cyclone

Micro bag f i l t e r

R-J bag f i l t e r

R-J bag f i l t e r

Bag f i l t e r

Cyclone

A t t h e meal g r i n d i n g f a c i l i t y o p a c i t y ranged from 0 t o 5

pe rcen t wi th an average of 0 .9 p e r c e n t . Opaci ty a t bo th d e h u l l i n g

sites ranged from 0 t o 1 5 p e r c e n t w i th an average o p a c i t y of 1 . 9

pe rcen t a t t h e e a s t s t a c k and 1 . 2 p e r c e n t a t t h e w e s t s tack .

The h u l l b i n s i t e had o p a c i t y r ang ing from 5 t o 1 0 p e r c e n t

wi th an average o p a c i t y of 6 . 7 p e r c e n t . Other s i tes showed no

v i s i b l e emiss ions . A l l f i e l d d a t a s h e e t s from o p a c i t y r e a d i n g s

a r e i n Appendix C of t h i s r e p o r t .

I I I I

4

SECTION 3

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

3.1 MEAL SAMPLES

The meal sampling and analytical technique was adopted from

a volitilization head-space sampling procedure developed at Texas

A&M University.'

bottles with septum caps, tare weighed in the lab with two layers

of filter paper in the bottom of each. In the field just prior

to sampling, 0.5 mi of water was added to wet the filter paper,

using an automatic pipette. A long handled scoop was used to

take a sample from the conveyor belt. A small portion of this

scoop was then transferred to each of the triplicate samples

using a small spoon and a funnel. Septum caps were replaced

immediately on the samples. A n aluminum cap was then crimped

tightly over the septum for a final seal. Each bottle was then

weighed to determine the amount of sample collected. Meal samples

were stored in a cooler with ice for shipment back to the PEDCo

laboratory and stored in a refrigerator until analysis. Ideally

a 2.0 gram sample should be taken each time. However, sampling

had to be done quickly to prevent evaporation losses, and the

actual sample weight varied from 1.3.9 to 4 . 0 g.

Sample bottles used were 100 me glass serum

'P. J. Wan, M. Chittwood, C. M. Cater, "Determination of Residual Hexane in Solvent Extracted Meal," Food Protein R&D Center, Texas A&M University. 5

I

I I I I

Analysis was done by placing the sample bottle into a sand-

bath for two hours at 125°C and then gradually cooling the sample

to room temperature. A 1.0 mll head space sample is then injected

into a gas chromatograph. Calibration standards are made by

adding a known amount of 99 mole percent n-hexane to processed

meal that has been completely dried. To determine the dry weight

of the meal sampled after analysis, the samples were placed in a

drying oven uncapped and reweighed after the moisture and hexane

had been driven off.

3 . 2 OPACITY READINGS

Opacity was read by a qualified observer using the procedures

of Federal Register* Method 9. Readings were taken every 15

seconds mL 2 ' 9 . 4m&e periodsat each site. A / 4wo 6 nmc.ic

a9 J J ? N o v r m :3w 1 2 , /P77 *Federal Register, Vol. e, No, 16, Auyu9-t iZ, 127%.

6

t 1 1

APPENDIX A

MEAL SAMPLING LOG

E 1 1

A- 1

I

fl' ,I I I

1 1 I I c-. I I I 1 I I I lW I

d

'I

I I 'I i

I \

I

I I ..

I I I

I I I I I

APPENDIX B

MEAL SAMPLES LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

B-1

;I. DATA SHEET

;Iant: Ralston-Purina Memphis, Tennessee Date : August 8, 1 9 7 9

Sample Wet Wt. Wet Dry Date Time _c (g ) cus/s, (Ug/g) Snmple No.-Location -

9/20/79

9 /20 /79 9 / 2 0 / 7 9

' 9 / 2 0 / 7 9

I 9 / 2 0 / 7 9 9 / 2 0 / 7 9 9)20/79

I 9 /20 /79

I I I I I 1 I I I I I

..

5 3 1 532 533

5 3 4 5 3 5 0 536

537 5 3 8 539

540 5 4 1 542

543 544 545

546 54 7 548

549 5 5 0 5 5 1

552 553 554

555

557 556 0 5 5 8 5 5 9 560

56 1 5 6 2 5 6 3 .

D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9 D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9 D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9

After Dryer 8 / 8 / 7 9 After Dryer 8 / 8 / 7 9 After Dryer 8 / 8 / 7 9

Stripper 8 / 8 / 7 9 Stripper 8 / 8 / 7 9 Stripper 8 / 8 / 7 9

Final Edible 8 / 8 / 7 9 Final Edible 8 / 8 / 7 9 Final Edible 8 / 8 / 7 9

Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9 Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9 Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9

D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9 D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9 D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9

A.D. 8 / 8 / 7 9

A.D. 8 / 8 / 7 9 A.D. 8 / 8 / 7 9

Stripper 8 / 8 / 7 9 St r ippe r 8 / 8 / 7 9 Stripper 8 / 8 / 7 9

Final Edible 8 /8 /79 Final Edible 8 /8 /79 Final Edible 8 / 8 / 7 9

Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9 Final Meal 8 /8 /79 Final Meal 8 /8 /79

D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9 D.T. I 8 /8 /79 D.T. 8 / 8 / 7 9

0 Reanalysis of sample yielded same results. @ Dry weight was recorded incorrectly.

10:05 10:05 10:05

10:08 1 0 : 0 8 10 :08

10:ll 10:ll 10:ll

1 0 : 3 5 3 0 : 3 5 1 0 : 3 5

1 0 : 2 5 10:25 1 0 : 2 5

1 1 : o o 11:oo 11 :oo

11:03 11 :03 1 1 : 0 3

11 :07 11 :07 11 :07

11:11 11:11 11:11

11:13 11 :13 11 :13

1 1 : 5 5 11 :55 11 :55

1 . 5 9 1 .39 1 .32

1 . 6 3 1 . 5 2 1 .25

0 . 9 6 1 . 1 3 1 . 0 4

1 . 4 3 1 . 6 1 1 . 4 4

1 . 4 4 1 . 3 6 1 . 3 s

1 . 7 8 2.16 1 . 8 9

1 . 7 9 2 . 6 7 2 .14

1 . 9 2 1 . 9 8 1 . 7 4

2 . 6 3 2 . 0 8 2 .04

2 .34 2 .64 2 .66

2.28 2.39 2 .20

5 6 0 5 0 0 5 0 0

350 1 5 0 37 0

6 7 0 6 7 0 5 2 0

3 4 0 390 4 1 0

2 6 0 2 2 0 2 2 0

300 390 390

2 3 0 2 2 0 2 0 0

420 480 4 8 0

34 0 350 1 9 0

1 6 0 1 6 0 1 4 0

350 320 320

770 710 730

4 10 180 440

770 800 560

410 470 510

34 0 280 270

440 520 510

220 0 250 240

470 54 0 550

370 370 220

1 9 0 180 170

4 6 0 410 420

DATA SHEET :I. - August 8 , 1 9 7 9 Ralston-Pusina Memphis, Tennessee Date :

9 / 2 1 / 7 9 9 /21 /79 9 /21 /79

I

9 /21 /79

9 /2 1 / 7 9

9 / 2 1 / 7 9 9 / 2 1 / 7 9 I 9 /21 /79

9 / 2 1 / 7 9 9 / 2 1 / 7 9 9 /2 1/7 9

I 9 /22 /79 , 9 /22 /79 L 9/22/79

9 / 2 2 / 7 9

Sample No.-Location

564 A . D . 5 6 5 A.D. 5 6 6 A.D.

5 6 7 Stripper 5 6 8 Stripper 5 6 9 , Stripper

571 Final Edible 5 7 2 @ Final Edible

5 7 0 0 Final Edible

57 3 574 575

5 7 6 5 7 7 5 7 8

5 7 9 580 5 8 1

5 8 2 5 8 3 584

5 8 5 5 8 6 5 8 7

588 5 8 9 5 9 0

5 9 1 5 9 2 5 9 3

5 9 4 5 9 5 5 9 6

Final Meal Final Meal Final Meal

D.T. D.T. D.T.

A.D. A.D. A.D.

Stripper Stripper Stripper

Final Edible Final Edible Final Edible

Final Meal Final Meal Final Meal

D.T. D.T. D.T.

A.D. A.D. A.D.

Sample bate

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

-

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 0 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9 8 / 8 / 7 9

@ Reanalysis of .ample yielded same results

Q sample not collected. I I

i ' I

Time 1 1 : 5 8 11 : 58 11:58

1 2 : o o 1 2 : o o 1 2 : o o

1 2 : 0 4 1 2 : 0 4 1 2 : 0 4

1 2 : l O 1 2 : l O 1 2 : l O

13:lO 13: lO 13: lO

13 :12 13:12 1 3 : 1 2

13:15 1 3 : 1 5 1 3 : 1 5

1 3 : 2 0 1 3 : 2 0 1 3 : 2 0

1 3 : 2 2 1 3 : 2 2 1 3 : 2 2

1 3 : 5 9 1 3 : 5 9 1 3 : 5 9

14:Ol 14:Ol 14:Ol

Wet Ut . ( 9 )

2 . 4 5 2 . 8 0 2 . 3 9

1 . 9 2 1 . 9 0 2 . 2 3

2 . 2 7 2 . 2'3 - 2 . 9 6 2 . 9 7 3 . 0 9

2 . 2 6 2 . 5 2 2 . 5 6

2 . 7 4 2 . 5 5 2 . 0 2

1 - 8 0 1.73 1 . 6 3

2.. 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 . 4 5

3 . 2 6 2 . 7 2 3 . 0 2

2 . 2 7 2 . 0 8 2 . 2 9

2 . 2 6 2 . 6 5 2 . 9 6

Wet (vs/s,

2 3 0 1 7 0 2 2 0

610 54 0 5 4 0

2 9 0 440 - 1 2 0 1 9 0 1 7 0

4 0 0 4 4 0 4 4 0

2 5 0 1 8 0 2 3 0

6 2 0 4 9 0 5 5 0

1 5 0 1 2 0 1 4 0

1 3 0 1 7 0 1 5 0

4 2 0 4612 4 1 0

2 4 0 2 8 0 2 3 0

Dry (ug /q )

270 200 260

670 610 580

330 51 0 - 1 4 0 220 200

5 4 0 570 570

290 210 220

6 7 0 540 6 30

1 5 0 1 2 0 1 6 0

1 6 0 200 1 7 0

570 600 560

280 330 270

DATA SHEET

ant: Ralston-Purina Memphis, Tennessee

Date

9/22/79

.P;22/79 ' 9/22/79 9/22/79 9/22/79

9/22/79 9/22/79 9/22/79 I 49/22/79

9/22/79

. 9/22/79 9/22/79 I 9/22/79 9/22/79

9/22/79 ' I 9/22/79 I 9/22/79

Sample No.-LocstiOn

597 0 Stripper 598 0 Stripper 599 Stripper

600 Final Edible 601 Final Edible 602 Final Edible

603 Final Meal 604 Final Meal 605 Final Meal

606 D.T. 607 D.T. 608 D.T.

609 A . D . 610 A . D . 611 A . D .

612 0 Stripper 613 Stripper 614 Stripper

615 Final Edible 616 Final Edible 617 Final Edible

618 Final Meal 619 Final Meal 620 Final Meal

621 D.T. 622 D.T. 623 D.T.

624 Q A . D . 625 A.D. 626 A.D.

627 Stripper 628 Stripper 629. Stripper

Sample Date

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 6/8/79 8/8/79

-

8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

6/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

8/8/79 8/8/79 8/8/79

@ Reanalysis of .ample yielded same results 1 I I

Date: Auqust 8. 1979

Time 14 : 04 14:04 14 : 04

1 4 : l O 14:lO 14:lO

14:12 14:12 14:12

15:04 15:04 15:04

15:06 15:06 15:06

15:09 15:09 1s:o9

15:13 15:13 15:13

15:15 15:15 15:15

16:05 16:05 16:05,

16:06 16:06 16:06

16:lO 16:lO 16:lO

Wet Ht. 0 1.67 1.83 1.86

2.44 3.'08 2.45

2.95 2.97 3.02

2.38 2.27 2.08

2.44 2.42 2.26

3.97 1.25 1.68

2.40 2.27 2.02

2.57 2.47 2.51

2.11 2.16 2.32

1.36 2.25 2.43

1.47 1 . 4 1 1.61

Wet ( l J 9 / 9 )

530 360 430

160 150 140

190 170 190

380 460 370

270 270 240

220 420 430

150 150 130

160 160 160

430 480 380

350 250 280

460 470 420

Dry (ug/g)

570 410 470

170 160 160

230 210 170

510 600 510

310 330 300

570 460 520

170 170 150

200 200 200

580 600 510

1000 290 350

54 0 540 500

DATA SHEET

,#ant: Ralston-Purina Memphis, Tennessee -

Sample Date

9/22/19 6 3 0 Final E d i b l e 8 /8 /79 6 3 1 Final E d i b l e 8 /8 /79 1 ;;;;;E 6 3 2 Final E d i b l e 8 / 8 / 7 9

6 3 3 Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9 634 Final Meal 8 /8 /79 6 3 5 Final Meal 8 / 8 / 7 9

, t 2 b Z i s Sample No.-Location - Date : Aua u St 8 . 1 9 7 9

Wet Ut. Wet Dry

1 6 : 1 4 1 . 9 8 1 6 0 180

16:14 2 . 1 2 180 190

1 6 : 1 6 2 . 5 2 200 2 30 1 6 : 1 6 2 . 0 1 2 0 0 240 1 6 : 1 6 2 . 6 5 2 1 0 260

Time (g) (Yg/g) ( U S / S ) - 1 6 : 1 4 2 . 2 9 1 4 0 160

I I i

I I 1

I I

I I I I I .. .

I I I I

APPENDIX C

OPACITY FIELD DATA SHEETS

c-1

Y c

D 0

Ln

> c V 4 L 0 Y L-

U w c LL 0 * a < x

cn

I

2

E -

I

\

I 0 , c U

z i Y / L 0,

d.c

z $ 5 I

I I z

C - c < > . :( E

C

I

T i_ I

I

I ' I

Y E

0 - L

W > O-

W 01 L

c U v)

m

L

n

C 0 Y m > L W

0 e 0 +I x 0,

W I

c

2

c

L 0 c - - a U Ln W c3 0 z 3 0 u Y

a

?i

W L s Y (D L W

E t Y C W

5 L c Q

W W CI Ln U c X c

c 0

Y c

u t n c

I !

I I ! ! I I I

I I 1 I I I I I

STEAM PLUME Seconds (check if applicable)

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

1 I

Form 1403 Date 6/78

!

- . ...

‘ I

I I

i

& E

0 1 0 c

!?a L r n c c o r u - 0 W

L c,

L

a m

c ii * E W

METHOD 9 O B S E R V A T I O N RECORD PAGE 2 OF.%-

COMPANY %L57od - 3,>&/+ A OBSERVER a &,.I I 9 5 , I O r n * . >

4

b

Form 1403 Date 6/78

I

W I

* I-

U 4 c 0

c 4

w 5 c LL 0 % OL < z

Ln

- Y

a

E: -

W c

01 m L m z

W

m z U w 0

F

c

s L L

E 0 Y U W L

c

- n

W L U

L W

a a

E 0- & z

L 01 > O- . . L U m u W W

m r- \ L n

W L c 0 a

c -

Form 1403 Date 6 /78

z = m 3rn 7 - rn 1

Q

b

METHOD 9 OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE 2 OF?- - COMPANY a,$\&, p 3 2 , . v ~ OBSERVER ~ A . J . I> 3- Ia*ha.-

L O C A T I O N q~q,&,, , - i t f l n T Y P E F A C I L I T Y Gto-r-Jd H;lls

T E S T NO. 3 P O I N T OF EtIISSIONS bo,. +, I t e c

DATE 8-E-75 J

Form 1403 Date 6/78

rc I - I LL 0

Y c < e

L

* I-

U c L 0 L C z C I- < z

-

- - r, W c Y 0 d 5 5 - > LL 0 C p: C U W a

0

0 0

!A z

- F:

I- z c - a

L a

d L @ E c n : 3

0 i m .c U m

0 c

L c c 0 c, U W L c n

E 0 LI

> L W ul D 0 c 0 Y z pl

W I

c

m

c

W L 2 U

L W

m

E

e @- U c 0, c

.

i

Form 1403 Date 6/78

5

I

-

LL 0 VI E E z

* I-

V 4 c 0

c 4 p: w 5 < LL 0

a c I: & VI

- Y

>

-

I

-0 E Y

0 1 8 E d .- L

+ I o Y In

L u

Y.c

2 $ 5

I

i

e Y V 0 a V

01

Io c U U

0

r - !5 L c E 0 Y U 0, L

c

c n

Y E

0

E 0 4 * > L W U CI 0 L 0 Y z 0,

Q, I

c

n

c

c

v W W

Ln

0 C

3

n

c

01 L 3 Y

L W

m

e c Y C W c

P c

i 01 > O-

m I- \

W

a c c

c U

w 0, U C rn U n .- 0

METHOD 9 OBSERVATION

COMPANY & \ G . n ?a OBSERVER

RECORD PAGE 2 OF

4

b

Form 1403 Date 6/78

3 P r . .

I J Q P

< ...

* I-

V 4 E- O

- W c 4 a W 5 < L 0

r - u n

L W

-0 e 0 .- g

5 aii 5

L c

22 c W - J w 0

c wlv u > U w

Y C L m L u u- - v o

m n n 3 m

Y E 0

E 0 4 m > L W Ln 0 0 c. 0 4.8 c 0,

W I

c

a

-

- V W W m n

0 c x c

w L 3 Y m L W e c

L W >

U . -vl

W

L O 0- - u

VI^

' t w 8 . O U vv,

m * u Y m

I 0 c -

W U E lv u .n .C

0

z 0 c

t H e z - a w I t 0

Seconds . . ~~ I Hr. 1 M i n . 1 0 I15 I 3 0 I45 i Attached 1 Detached COMMENTS

STEAM PLUME ( check if a m 1 i c a b l e )

b

J I I I

( U ( U 1 - 13 I ' n I I I

Form 1403 Date 6/78

I

I I

I 1 1;

P r 1

m I ? E I

9 I I

9 1 IE I

a

b I

dl LL 0

* I- - V < L 0 L 0 z t I- < r

- T Y In E c -

r p: Y c Y 0

Y 0 l-

T VI p: E

> LL 0 I

0 cc C U Y p:

0.

Y

01 F m c

E

0 c

n. L W > O- E

0 Y 10 > L W

0

c

2

w m L 10 c U

2 - 0 .- ED

m I. \ L n

. w L U L. m u a w w Y . - Io v - r L - * 0 W v -

0- - V

W

m a c

c - u a E" L O n.

Y 'tu co z 8 . O L

? " * 10 x o w - c o u 0

< * u > u Y d v) L

U In c P

E L c t 0 c

W W W v) a

c 0 W

+ Y V 0

U

5 Y c m c

I'

Y U W L

0 c = c c

0

I

B I

1

4

I

1 E I I 1

METHOD 9 OBSERVATION RECORD PAGE 7- OF 2 COMPANY &l5bn ?arnnc OBSERVER , I > . ;lnrna 4

OAT E 81817+

LOCATION ne,Dh.. T -rn,’l TYPE FACILITY fla\\ c y c ~ s ~ 3 i

TEST NO. ‘7 P O I N T OF Ell1SS10115 +?DO& a&, c

S e c o n d s 1 (check if a p p l i c a b l e )

M i n . 0 ( 1 5 I30 I 4 5 I A t t a c h e d I Detached COMMEXTS I

Form 1403 Date 6/78