Upload
meryle
View
27
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Reference Information Specifications for Europe Overview Presentation to HACPB3. [email protected] www.eu-rise.org. Wyn Cudlip (QinetiQ) and others RISE Participants. Project goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Reference Information Specifications for Europe
Overview Presentation to HACPB3
Wyn Cudlip (QinetiQ) and others RISE Participants
www.eu-rise.org
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 2
Project goals
• To define a methodology and guidelines for the creation of geospatial Data Product Specifications (DPS), consistent with international and industrial standards.
• To test the methodology by creating harmonised DPS for Hydrography, LandCover and Elevation; as input datasets to diffuse nutrient leakage modelling for the Water Framework Directive (WFD).
• To test the DPS in an on-line “Test Environment” with data from a test area (Sweden & Norway).
• To demonstrate the automatic creation of hDPs from existing databases
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 3
Presentation Overview
• Short intro to RISE project
• Deliverables provided so far
• Introduce additional presentations
• Response to External Reviewer comments
• Conclusions
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 4
RISE consortium
EuroGeographics
Lantmäteriet
BKG
Public Institutions -Source data providers
OGC-Europe
QinetiQ
IndustryTechnology
“HarmonisationAdvisory Committee & Planning Board”
“WFD & GMES”
“Key stakeholders”Users and applications
2 yr FP6 Project; started Sept. 05.Working relationship with MOTIIVE.
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 5
The RISE and MOTIIVE Projects
• FP6, SSA for GMES data harmonisation• Duration 24 months
• Started 1st September 2005
• RISE & MOTIIVE – complementary activities
• RISE -emphasis on methodology and schema testing
• MOTIIVE - emphasis on feature types and registries
and cost benefit analysis
• RISE - empashis on land
• MOTIIVE - emphasis on Marine
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 6
Approach
Requirements Use Cases
Conceptual schema (UML)
Testing
Prototype
Application schema (GML) Cost
benefit
Exploitation guidelines
RISEMethodology
Data Product Specification
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 7
Key Steps in the development of “harmonised” Data Product Specification
• Analyse Use Case
• Develop Conceptual Schema (in UML)• Including Feature Type Catalogue and Data Dictionary update
• Develop GML Application Schema• this can be automated
• e.g., UGAS, UML to GML conversion tool
• Define harmonised Data Product Specification
• Data Products created from existing data
• Goal: to create “on the fly” with suitable server software
Use CaseDevelopment
Use CaseDevelopment
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Data Dictionary Update
Data Dictionary Update
DPS and App SchemaDevelopment
DPS and App SchemaDevelopment
Implementation,testing and validation
Implementation,testing and validation
Use CaseDevelopment
Use CaseDevelopment
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Data Dictionary Update
Data Dictionary Update
DPS and App SchemaDevelopment
DPS and App SchemaDevelopment
Implementation,testing and validation
Implementation,testing and validation
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 8
RequirementsRequirementsRequirementsAs-is analysis
Gap analysis
Use CaseDevelopment
Use CaseDevelopment
Use CaseDevelopment
Use CaseDevelopment
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
Requirementsand Feature Types
Identification
App SchemaDevelopmentApp SchemaDevelopmentApp SchemaDevelopment
Data ProductSpecificationDevelopment
Implementation,testing and validation
Implementation,testing and validation
Implementation,testing and validation
Implementation,testing and
validation(using WFS)
Che
cklis
t fo
r da
ta
Har
mon
isat
ion
requ
irem
ents
Che
cklis
t fo
r da
ta
Har
mon
isat
ion
requ
irem
ents
Checklist addresses steps to data harmonisation
Sup
port
ing
com
pone
nts:
fea
ture
dat
a di
ctio
nary
, C
RS
reg
istr
y, e
tc.
Sup
port
ing
com
pone
nts:
fea
ture
dat
a di
ctio
nary
, C
RS
reg
istr
y, e
tc.
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 9
Key assumptions
Mandatory:• Overview• Specification scopes• Data product identification• Data content and structure• Reference systems• Data quality• Data product delivery• Metadata
Optional:• Data capture• Data maintenance• Portrayal• Additional information
• A Data Specification is based on a data product specification (DPS) according to ISO 19131. Such a DPS includes the following sections:
• RISE harmonisation is concerned with more than just data content and structure.
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 10
1.2 Reference model
1. INSPIRE Information Model
1.7 Object referencing modelling
1.6 Coordinate refe-rencing and units model
1.1 INSPIRE Principles
2. Operational components/registers
3. Guidelines & Best Practice
2.2 Terminology
1.3 Application Schemas
2.1 Identifier Management
2.4 Dictionaries
1.8 Data translation model/guidelines
2.3 Feature catalogues 2.5 Conformance
1.4 ISO 19100 Profile
1.5 Multi-lingual text andcultural adaptibility
3.1 Metadata
3.2 Maintenance
3.3 Quality
3.4 Data Transfer
3.5 Derived re-porting & multiple representations
1.9 Portrayal model 3.6 Consistency between data
3.7 Data capturing
Data Harmonisation Components – Overview
(developed by INSPIRE Drafting Team „Data Specifications“ in collaboration with RISE; RISE
will focus on the methodology, the DT will focus on generic aspects of the conceptual model)
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 11
Relevant ISO Standards
• UML ISO 19103• Conceptual Schema ISO 19107/8/9• Application Schema ISO 19109• Feature Type ISO 19109• Data Dictionary ISO 19126• Data Product Specification ISO 19131• Quality ISO 19113/5• Metadata ISO 19115• Multi Lingual ISO 19139• Portrayal ISO 19117• GML ISIO 19136• Translating WFS ISO 19142+43
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 12
Original Project Phases
• Phase 1 (1st 6 months) – requirements and draft methodology.
• Phase 2 (2nd 6 months) – Use Cases analysis; Application Schema and harmonised data product specifications.
• Phase 3 (3rd 6 months) – Prototype and testing.
• Phase 4 (final 6 months) – interoperability testing and issue Final Guidelines
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 13
RISE Deliverables
RequirementsRequirementsRequirementsRequirements
Use Use CasesCasesUse Use
CasesCases
MethodologyMethodology
Conceptual Conceptual SchemaSchema
Conceptual Conceptual SchemaSchema
TestingTestingTestingTesting
PrototypePrototypePrototypePrototype
GMLGMLApplicationApplication
SchemaSchema
GMLGMLApplicationApplication
SchemaSchemaCost Benefit Cost Benefit
AnalysisAnalysisCost Benefit Cost Benefit
AnalysisAnalysis
Exploitation Exploitation GuidelinesGuidelines
Exploitation Exploitation GuidelinesGuidelines
Data Data SpecificationSpecification
Data Data SpecificationSpecification
ArchitectureArchitectureArchitectureArchitecture
Data Harmonisation Requirements ReportData Harmonisation Requirements ReportData Harmonisation Requirements ReportData Harmonisation Requirements Report
Use Case DescriptionsUse Case DescriptionsUse Case DescriptionsUse Case Descriptions
Exploitation GuidelinesExploitation GuidelinesExploitation GuidelinesExploitation Guidelines
Services Architecture OutlineServices Architecture OutlineServices Architecture OutlineServices Architecture Outline
Cost Benefit ReportCost Benefit ReportCost Benefit ReportCost Benefit Report
Test Environment ReportTest Environment ReportTest Environment ReportTest Environment Report
GML Application SchemaGML Application SchemaGML Application SchemaGML Application Schema
Data Product SpecificationData Product SpecificationData Product SpecificationData Product Specification
Conceptual Schema in UMLConceptual Schema in UMLConceptual Schema in UMLConceptual Schema in UML
Methodology & Guidelines for on Use Case & Schema DevelopmentMethodology & Guidelines for on Use Case & Schema DevelopmentMethodology & Guidelines for on Use Case & Schema DevelopmentMethodology & Guidelines for on Use Case & Schema Development
To come:
So far:
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 14
RISE Document Highlights
• User Harmonisation Requirements Document• Analysed 96 GMES Projects plus INSPIRE and WFD Initiatives.
• Use Case document• Analysis of Swedish and Swedish/Norwegian Use Cases
• Requirements for hydrography, Land Cover and Elevation (DEM)
• Methodology and Guidelines Document + Checklist• Passed to MOTIIVE, and INSPIRE Drafting Team on Data Specifications
• Application Schema in UML and GML (automatic conversion)
• Harmonised Data Product Specifications• Defines data products that can be generated automatically
• RISE Service Architecture Outline document• Places RISE activity in a broader !SO/OGC context
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 15
Later presentations to address:
• RISE Test Environment
• Cost Benefit Issues
• Exploitation Guidelines
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 16
External Reviewer Comments
• Concern regarding directions of the project and the possible approaches towards redirecting the projects towards it’s initial target: … “methodology and guidelines for the creation of implementation specifications”
• Recommendations: The Project should:
• …jointly review the process / flow of documents leading to the specification….
• Clarify how the current standards may be exploited / extended to include the necessary specification information for either an “outside producer” or an automated procedure.
• Update the Deliverables according to the findings / comments.
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 17
RISE Response to Reviewer Comments
• RISE activity is and always has been directed towards
developing a “methodology and guidelines for the creation of
implementation specifications”
• The RISE-generated Data Product Specifications have been
created for RISE test purposes and are not intended to have
broader application without additional development.
• Given the reviewers comments, RISE agrees that there is
scope to revise some of the documents in order to clarify
their scope and content and the improve their usability.
• Further discussion with the Reviewer is proposed to clarify
the issues.
Presentation to HACPB3, Brussels, 6th June, 2007. V1.0 Page 18
Conclusion
• RISE has been able to follow the original proposal workplan without any major changes.
• The Test Environment Development and testing of the Data Product Specifications is behind the original schedule but it is still possible to complete the project as scheduled
• (subject to satisfactorily addressing the External Reviewers Comments)
• Final Deliverables to include:• Revised Use Case Document
• Revised Methodology and Guidelines Document (inc. lessons learnt)
• Final Data Product Specifications (+ revised UML & GML if necessary)
• And:• RISE Test Environment Document
• Cost Benefit Analysis Report
• Exploitation Guidelines