7
Bibliography 1. Abramovitz I. Et al. The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: A study in an increased sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endodon, 2000; 26: 435-439. 2. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent, 2002; 37: 431- 7. 3. Al-Hazaimeh N, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. Int Endodon J, 2001; 34: 40-46. 4. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength of newer types of Endodontic posts. J Dent, 1999; 27: 275-278. 5. Baraban DJ. A simplified method for making posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent, 1970; 24: 287-297. 6. Barkhordar RA. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 61: 676. 7. Christy JM, Pipko DJ. Fabrication of a dual-post veneer crown. JADA, 1967; 75: 1419-25. 120

Refer Nces

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Refer Nces

Bibliography

1. Abramovitz I. Et al. The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space

preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling: A study in an

increased sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endodon, 2000; 26: 435-

439.

2. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture endodontically treated teeth

restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent, 2002; 37: 431-7.

3. Al-Hazaimeh N, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study into the effect of the

ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth

incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. Int

Endodon J, 2001; 34: 40-46.

4. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength

of newer types of Endodontic posts. J Dent, 1999; 27: 275-278.

5. Baraban DJ. A simplified method for making posts and cores. J Prosthet

Dent, 1970; 24: 287-297.

6. Barkhordar RA. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically

treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 61: 676.

7. Christy JM, Pipko DJ. Fabrication of a dual-post veneer crown. JADA,

1967; 75: 1419-25.

8. Demarchi MGA, Sato EFL. Leakage of interim post and cores used during

laboratory fabrication of custom posts. J Endodon, 2002; 28: 328-329.

9. Desort K.D. The prosthodontic use of endodontically treated teeth: Theory

and biomechanics of post preparation. J Prosthet Dent, 1983; 49: 203-206.

10. Fredriksson M et al. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth

restored by carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. J. Prosthet. Dent.,

1998; 80: 151-157.

120

Page 2: Refer Nces

Bibliography

11. Freedman GA. Esthetic post and core treatment. Dent Clin N Am, 2001; 45:

103-116.

12. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic

considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent,

1992; 67: 458-67.

13. Heydecke G, Butz F and Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of

endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after

restoration with different post and core systems. J Dent, 2001; 29: 427-433.

14. Hoef P. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J

Prosthet Dent, 1982; 47: 176.

15. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered,

individually cast or prefabricated, parallel sided posts. Int J Prosthodont,

1992; 5: 257-261.

16. Johnson JK, Schwartz NL, Blackwell RT. Evaluation and restoration of

endodontically treated posterior teeth. JADA, 1976; 93: 597-606.

17. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All ceramic posts and cores: The state of the art.

Quintessence Int, 1999; 30: 383-392.

18. Kurer PF. Retention of post crowns: A solution of the problem. Br Dent J,

1967; 15: 167-169.

19. Lewis R, Smith BGN. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br

Dent J, 1988; 165: 95-97.

20. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and

cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont, 1995; 8: 155-161.

21. Lovadahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-

cores. J Prosthet Dent, 1977; 38: 507.

121

Page 3: Refer Nces

Bibliography

22. Martinez-Insua A et al. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless

teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon fiber post with a

composite core. J Prosthet Dent, 1993; 80: 527-32.

23. Nayyar A et al. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique

for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent, 1980; 44: 398.

24. Newman MP et al. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent, 2003; 89: 360-7.

25. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement

as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent, 2001; 86: 304-8.

26. Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: A review.

Operative Dent, 2003; 28: 686-91.

27. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result

endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endodon, 1989; 15: 512-516.

28. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity

and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J

Endodon, 2003; 29: 125-131.

29. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.

JADA, 1990; 120: 558-566.

30. Robbins JW. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North

Am 2002; 46: 367-384.

31. Rosen H. Operative Procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J

Prosthet Dent, 1961; 973-986.

32. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture

resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced

dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised

roots. Quintessence Int, 1996; 27: 483-491.

122

Page 4: Refer Nces

Bibliography

33. Sedgley C, Messer H.H. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J

Endodon, 1992; 18: 332-335.

34. Smith CT, Schuman N. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A

guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 457-462.

35. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J

Prosthet Dent, 1984; 52: 28-35.

36. Stankiewicz MR and Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: A literature review. Int

Endodont J, 2002; 35: 575-581.

37. Taleghani M. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J

Prosthet Dent, 1987; 57: 446.

38. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature of review on the prosthetic

treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont, 2004; 17:

369-376.

39. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure

characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent, 1995; 73: 439-44.

40. Vichi A et al. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for

bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Material, 2002; 18:

495-502.

41. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical

procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: A microscopic

investigation. J Endodon, 2002; 28: 355-360.

42. Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: Classification and

evaluation. J Endodon, 1991; 17: 338-342.

43. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus CS. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth

post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endodon, 1991; 17: 293-97.

123

Page 5: Refer Nces

Bibliography

124