Ref. No.: MJH/J1387/D1/1 - Lincolnshire County Councilparishes.lincolnshire.gov.uk/Files/Parish/35/4D_Site_Investigation.pdf · Ref. No.: MJH/J1387/D1/1 Date: November 2015

INTRUSIVE GEOTECHNICAL &

GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

For

BSP CONSULTING

On the Site of a

PROPOSED SPORTS PAVILLION,

HYKEHAM COMMUNITY HUB,

NORTH HYKEHAM,

LINCOLNSHIRE

Ref. No.: MJH/J1387/D1/1

Date: November 2015

MJH/J1425/D1/1

Sports Pavilion, Hykeham Community Hub, Intrusive Geotechnical & Geo-environmental

North Hykeham, Lincolnshire Investigation Report

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………………....1

2.0 THE SITE & BACKGROUND.…….……………………………………………………………......2

2.1 Site Location & Description

2.2 Geology

3.0 SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION……………………….……………….…..………………..…3

3.1 Site Works

3.2 Laboratory Testing & Analyses

4.0 FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION…..……..............................……………..…………….….4

4.1 Ground Conditions Encountered

4.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing

4.3 Chemical Laboratory Analyses

4.4 Waste Classification

4.5 Infiltration Rate Testing

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL & GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS……………………………6

5.1 Summary of Ground Conditions

5.2 Foundations

5.3 Concrete Design

5.4 Construction

5.5 Soakaways

5.6 Geo-Environmental Assessment

DRAWINGS

J1425/01 Site Location Plan

J1425/02 Approximate Locations of Investigatory Holes

APPENDICES

Appendix A Trial Pit Holes

Appendix B Results of Soakaway Testing

Appendix C Laboratory Test Results

Appendix D Waste Classification Report

MJH/J1425/D1/1

Sports Pavilion, Hykeham Community Hub Intrusive Geotechnical & Geo-environmental

North Hykeham, Lincolnshire - 1 - Investigation Report

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 This report describes an intrusive geotechnical and geo-environmental ground

investigation for a proposed sports pavilion, Hykeham Community Hub, North

Hykeham, Lincolnshire, carried out for our Client, BSP Consulting.

1.2 The objectives of this investigation have been to obtain information relating to the

geotechnical and geo-environmental conditions pertaining to the 2 possible locations of

the pavilion building and to produce an assessment of these factors in relation to the

proposed development.

1.3 It has been assumed in the production of this report that ground levels in the area of the

proposed pavilion will remain generally unchanged. If the assumptions made above and

in the later sections of this report are not the case then the recommendations presented

within this report may require some amendment.

1.4 This report has been produced on behalf of the Client, BSP Consulting, and no

responsibility is accepted to any third party for all or any part. This report should not be

relied upon or transferred to any other parties without the express written authorisation

of Emcus Limited. If any unauthorised third party comes into possession of this report,

they rely on it at their own risk and the authors owe them no duty of care or skill.

1.5 The site plans and drawings enclosed in this report should not be scaled off.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



2.0 THE SITE AND BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Location & Description

2.1.1 The 2 possible areas of the proposed pavilion (hereafter also referred to as the site) are

located in the central-eastern area of the proposed Hykeham Community Hub, Valerian

Place, North Hykeham, Lincolnshire. The Ordnance Survey grid reference for the

approximate centre of the site is SK 9360 6544, (See Drawing J1425/01).

2.1.2 For the purpose of the recent site investigation site works (undertaken 29th

October

2015) access to the site was gained off the western end of Valerian Way.

2.1.3 At the time of the investigation site works (29th

October 2015), the site generally

comprised part of a large grassed field.

2.2 Geology

2.2.1 The published British Geological Survey (BGS) map, Sheet 114, Lincoln, Solid & Drift

Edition, Scale 1:50,000, dated 1973 has been examined in respect of the strata

underlying the site.

2.2.2 The published geological map indicates that the natural strata beneath the site

comprises ‘Older River Sand & Gravel’, underlain by strata from the Jurassic Upper

Lias Clay & Shale.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



3.0 SCOPE OF THE INVESTIGATION

3.1 Site Works

3.1.1 Intrusive investigation of the site was carried out on the 29th

October 2015, under the

full time supervision of a suitably experienced Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental

Engineer. The intrusive investigation works comprised the excavation of 7 trial pits

(TP1 – TP7), using a tractor mounted back acting excavator, fitted with a 600mm wide

bucket. The trial pits were excavated to maximum depths of 1.8m to 3.2m below

ground level (bgl), in the locations shown approximately on Drawing J1425/02.

3.1.2 The trial pits were logged in general accordance with BS EN ISO 14688-1:2002 and BS

EN ISO 14688-1:2004, with Engineers logs of the pits presented in Appendix A of this

report. Representative disturbed samples of all the strata encountered in the trial pits

were placed into sealable plastic tubs and glass jars, provided by the analytical

laboratory for that purpose.

3.1.3 Once advanced to the required depths, trial pits TP1 & TP4 – TP7 were immediately

backfilled with the excavated arisings, and tamped down with the excavator bucket. In

contrast, trial pits TP2 & TP3 were filled with water to 1.32m bgl., (considered to be

the approximate invert level of any likely drain) and monitored to provide an initial

assessment of the suitability of the strata beneath the site to receive water from

soakaways. The results of the soakaway testing are presented in Appendix B of this

report.

3.2 Laboratory Testing & Analyses

3.2.1 Selected disturbed samples recovered from the trial pits were subsequently submitted to

MCERTS and UKAS accredited laboratories for chemical analysis and geotechnical

testing.

3.2.2 4 samples (2 topsoil and 2 natural strata) were analysed at the laboratories of Chemtech

Environmental for a typical suite of potential contaminants, including a range of metals

& semi-metals, phenol, cyanides, total sulphate, sulphur, sulphides & pH, together with

the USEPA 16 speciated PolyAromatic Hydrocarbons. [PAH’s]. 2 samples were also

screened for presence of asbestos.

3.2.3 2 representative samples of the natural strata were submitted for geotechnical testing at

the laboratories of Geolabs in accordance with BS 1377: Methods of Test of Soils for

Civil Engineering Purposes: 1990. The testing carried out on these samples comprised

a single plasticity index test and a single particle size distribution test.

3.2.4 2 samples of the natural strata were also tested at the Chemtech Environmental

laboratories for pH and water soluble sulphates to determine the potential

aggressiveness of the ground to buried concrete.

3.2.5 Further details and the results of the chemical contamination analyses and geotechnical

testing are presented in Appendix C of this report.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



4.0 FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION

4.1 Ground Conditions Encountered

4.1.1 In all of the trial pits, loose dark brown sandy topsoil was encountered to depths of

0.3m – 0.4m bgl.

4.1.2 Natural strata was encountered in all of the trial pits, underlying the topsoil. The natural

strata generally comprised loose to medium sand with occasional sub-rounded gravel.

The gravelly sands generally became medium dense below 0.8m - 1.8m bgl., and

extended beyond the bottom of the trial pits. Within that predominantly granular strata,

firm grey sandy, gravelly clay was encountered in TP5 from 0.7m – 1.2m bgl., and in

TP6 from 0.6m – 1.8m bgl.

4.1.3 Groundwater was encountered in the trial pits at 3m bgl.

4.1.4 The sides of the trial pits generally remained stable for the short time they were left

open before being backfilled. However, the sides of trial pit TP3 collapsed during the

soakaway testing.

4.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing

4.2.1 The results of the laboratory testing revealed a pH of 7.7 and 7.9 for the natural strata at

the site. Associated water soluble sulphate concentrations of 13mg/l., and 41mg/l., as

SO4 were revealed for the samples tested.

4.2.2 The results of the geotechnical testing revealed the cohesive strata encountered in TP5

had a moisture content of 22% and a plasticity index of 23, with 78% of the sample

smaller than 425m.

4.2.3 The particle size distribution test revealed the sample of natural strata from TP1 at 1m

bgl., comprised very clayey sand.

4.3 Chemical Laboratory Analyses

4.3.1 The results of the chemical contamination testing from the investigation site works and

supplementary site visit have been assessed, so far as possible with reference to the

recently published Soil Guideline Values (SGV’s). Thus far, however, SGV’s have only

been published for eleven determinands. In the absence of published SGV’s for many

contaminants, the results of the chemical contamination analyses have been assessed

with reference to Generic Assessment Criteria (GAC’s), generally calculated using the

new version (1.06) of the CLEA software, its handbook, and pending publication of

new toxicological reports, the ‘old approach’ toxicological reports. In the absence of

published guidance for assessing certain potential contaminants, the assessment of the

determined concentrations of these substances has been based on a combination of

previous experience or other available assessment guidelines.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



4.3.2 The calculated SGV’s, GAC’s, etc. are interpreted in current guidance as ‘intervention

values’ relative to a particular intended end use for the respective site, to provide a

means of assessing possible long term chronic risks to human health. They are based on

assumptions about soil conditions and the existence of exposure pathway behaviour for

the particular contaminant. The exceedance of an SGV, GAC, etc. can thus be taken as

indicating that further detailed assessment and/or remedial action is required to

enable/facilitate development for the particular end use of the site concerned.

4.3.3 We have been advised that the proposed development will comprise a sports pavilion.

As such, the results of the contamination analyses have been assessed for a

‘commercial’ land use category within the CLEA model

4.3.4 The results of the chemical analyses have revealed the site to be free of significant

contamination, with all the determinands tested for, revealing concentrations, falling

either below the levels of detection or not exceeding their respective assessment criteria

(published SGV’s / GAC’s) for a commercial end use.

4.4 Waste Classification

4.4.1 The results of the chemical contamination analyses have been assessed using the

‘HazWasteOnline’ software. A copy of the Waste Classification report is presented in

Appendix D of this report.

4.4.2 The results of the chemical analyses indicate that the topsoil and natural strata would

classify as Non Hazardous Waste if removed from the site for appropriate off-site

disposal / recycling.

4.5 Infiltration Rate Testing

4.5.1 Once trial pits TP2 and TP3 had been filled to approximately 1.32m bgl., the water

level in TP2 was monitored for 3 hours. Within that 3 hour monitoring period, the water

level in TP2 only dropped by 2cm to 1.34m bgl., which was an insufficient drop to

calculate a representative infiltration rate. Furthermore, after approximately 30 minutes

of monitoring, the sides of trial pit TP3 collapsed.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



5.0 GEOTECHNICAL & GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS

5.1 Summary of Ground Conditions

5.1.1 It is considered that the ground conditions encountered beneath the site generally

confirm the published geological map.

5.1.2 In all of the trial pits, loose dark brown sandy topsoil was encountered to depths of

0.3m – 0.4m bgl. Underlying the topsoil, natural strata generally comprising loose to

medium sand with occasional sub-rounded gravel was encountered. The gravelly sands

generally became medium dense below 0.8m - 1.8m bgl. Within that predominantly

granular strata, firm grey sandy, gravelly clay was encountered in TP5 from 0.7m –

1.2m bgl., and in TP6 from 0.6m – 1.8m bgl.

5.2 Foundations

5.2.1 It is considered that the loose to medium dense sands and local firm sandy clays

encountered beneath the site will provide a suitable bearing strata for strip / trench fill

foundations to be used for the single storey pavilion building. It is recommended that

strip / trench fill foundations which bear on the loose to medium dense sands and firm

clays are designed assuming a nett allowable ground bearing pressure in the order of

100kN/m2. Mindful of the cohesive strata which has been encountered locally beneath

the site, it is recommended that foundations bear on undisturbed natural strata at a

minimum depth of 0.75m bgl.

5.2.2 If foundations span between sands and cohesive strata, it is recommended that

foundations are appropriately reinforced to minimise the potential effects of any

differential settlement. Alternatively, foundations could be locally deepened to bear

fully on granular strata.

5.2.3 It is considered that an appropriately designed ground bearing floor slab can be used for

the proposed pavilion.

5.2.4 It is considered that foundations which bear on the sands and local clay horizons will

not require any adjustment to protect against the potential effects of heave and

shrinkage associated with existing, proposed or recently removed trees and vegetation.

5.2.5 All foundations should be deepened below roots of 5mm in diameter.

5.3 Concrete Design

5.3.1 We have considered the sites geology and the ground conditions in accordance with the

guidelines contained in Part C of BRE Special Digest 1 : Concrete in aggressive

ground (2005) and have categorised the site as a ‘greenfield’ site.

5.3.2 The results of the water soluble sulphate analyses undertaken at the site fall indicate a

characteristic value within Design Sulphate (DS) Class DS-1. The groundwater

conditions at the site should be considered to be mobile (potentially). On this basis and

MJH/J1425/D1/1



from consideration of the pH conditions at the site, the site has been assigned an ACEC

(Aggressive Chemical Environment for Concrete) Class AC1.

5.3.3 The specific concrete mixes (The Design Chemical Class) to be used on site for all the

‘in the ground’ and ‘on the ground’ permanent applications should be determined,

mindful of the ACEC Class, by the site specific concrete requirements, in terms of the

required durability and structural performance. These are assessed in terms of the

Intended Working Life and any need for Additional Protective Measures (APM), as

detailed in Part D, with further guidance in Parts E and F, of the BRE Special Digest 1,

(2005).

5.4 Construction

5.4.1 It is anticipated that excavations at the site should be readily achieved using a

conventional JCB 3CX, or similar excavation plant.

5.4.2 It is considered that the longer term stability of excavations in the sands is likely to be

poor. As such we would recommend appropriate excavation support, battering of

excavation sides or other measures should to be used during construction.

5.5 Soakaways

5.5.1 The results of the preliminary infiltration rate testing indicate that the natural strata

beneath the site is unlikely to be sufficiently permeable to receive water from

soakaways.

5.6 Geo-Environmental Assessment

5.6.1 The results of the chemical analyses have revealed the site can be regarded as

uncontaminated for the proposed commercial end use.

5.6.2 Furthermore, the topsoil and the natural strata from the site would classify as Non

Hazardous Waste if removed from the site for appropriate off-site disposal / recycling.

5.6.3 If during the proposed development of the site, any visual or olfactory evidence of

contamination is encountered, then further advice from a suitably qualified and

experienced Geo-Environmental Engineer should be sought.

MJH/J1425/D1/1



We trust the above report is suitable for your present requirements. Should you have any

comments or queries, wish to discuss any of the above matters, or require any further

assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

For & on behalf of Emcus Ltd.

M. J. Hanford, BSc (Hon’s) P.Dip FGS

Technical Director

MJH/J1425/D1/1



DRAWINGS

Scale at A4: NTS

Project Drawn

Client Date

Drawing Title

Site Location

Sports Pavillion, Hykeham

Community Hub, North Hykeham

BSP Consulting29/11/2015

J1425/01

Approved

Date

MJH

29/11/2015

MJH

The Site

N

Scale at A4: NTS

Project Drawn

Client Date

J1425/02

Approved

Date

MJH

29/11/2015

MJH

Drawing TitleApproximate Trial Pit Locations

(Shown in relation to proposed

development option)

Sports Pavillion, Hykeham

Community Hub, North Hykeham

BSP Consulting29/11/2015

The Site

N

MJH/J1425/D1/1



APPENDICES

MJH/J1425/D1/1



Appendix A

Trial Pit Logs

Trial Pit LogTrialpit No

TP1

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:

Hykeham Community CentreProject No.

J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

3.20

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:

1) Groundwater was encountered at 3.0m bgl 2) Trial Pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Wa

ter

Str

ike Samples and In Situ Testing

Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.40

0.80

2.40

3.20

Level(m)

Legend Stratum Description

Loose dark brown sandy TOPSOIL.

Loose to medium dense light brown fine medium and coarse SAND. Occasional angular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartz and flint/chert gravel.

Medium dense brown - orange slightly gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert. Firm clay horizons present.

Medium dense brown - orange very gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert.

End of pit at 3.20 m

1

2

3

4

5

0.20 ES

0.60 ES

1.00 D


TP2

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

1.80

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:

1) No Groundwater Encountered 2) Soakaway test completed in trial pit. 3) Trial Pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.40

1.00

1.80

Level(m)






1

2

3

4

5


TP3

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

2.00

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:

1) No Groundwater Encountered 2) Soakaway test undertaken in trial pit resulting in collapse of pit sides. 3) Trial Pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.30

0.90

2.00

Level(m)




Medium dense brown - orange slightly gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert. Occasional firm clay horizons present.


1

2

3

4

5

0.10 ES

0.70 ES


TP4

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

3.10

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:

1) Groundwater was encountered at 3.0m bgl. 2) Trial Pit backfilled with arisings upon completion.

Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.30

0.60

2.00

3.10

Level(m)







1

2

3

4

5


TP5

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

3.20

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:


Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.40

0.70

1.20

3.20

Level(m)




Firm grey brown slightly gravelly CLAY with occasional fine medium and coarse sand horizons. Gravel is subangular fine and medium quartzite and flint/chert.

Medium dense brown - orange gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert. Occasional firm clay horizons present.


1

2

3

4

5

0.20 ES

0.50 ES

0.80 D


TP6

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

3.00

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:


Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.35

0.60

1.80

3.00

Level(m)




Firm grey brown slightly gravelly CLAY with occasional fine medium and coarse sand horizons. Gravel is subangular fine and medium quartzite and flint/chert.

Medium dense brown - orange gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert.


1

2

3

4

5

0.10 ES

0.50 ES


TP7

Sheet 1 of 1

Project Name:


J1425

Co-ords:

Level:

- Date

29/10/2015

Location:

Client:

North Hykeham

BSP Consulting

Dimensions (m):

Depth

3.00

Scale

1:25

Logged

JST

Remarks:

Stability:


Wa

ter

Str


Depth Type Results

Depth(m)

0.40

0.80

2.00

3.00

Level(m)




Medium dense brown - orange slightly gravelly fine medium and coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular and subrounded fine medium and coarse quartzite and flint/chert. Occasional firm clay horizons present.



1

2

3

4

5

MJH/J1425/D1/1



Appendix B

Results of Soakaway Testing

Client:

Site:

Test No: TP2

1.32Length (m) = 2.70 1.34Width (m) = 0.60 1.33Depth (m) = 1.80 1.34

1

Time (min) Depth (m) 1.620

0 1.320 3.204

1 1.330 0.016

2 1.330

5 1.340

10 1.340 120 1.340 530 1.340

60 1.340

90 1.340

120 1.340

150 1.340

180 1.340

Checked by: Date: 29/11/2015

CALCULATION OF SOIL INFILTRATION RATE

North Hykeham Community Hub

BSP Consulting

J1425Job No:

time from graph to reach 75% level =

Insufficient loss of water to calculate representative infiltration rate

Notes

Depth at start of test =

Depth at end of test =75% effective depth =25% effective depth =

Base area of pit (m2) =

Eff area of loss 75 - 25% (m2) =

Volume outflow 75 - 25% (m3) =

Size of Soakaway


Void ratio =

Soil infiltration rate, f, (m/s) = NA

Input by: JST Date: 03/11/2015

1.000

1.200

1.400

1.600

1.800

2.000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200

Dep

th (

m)

Time (mins)

t @ 75% effective depth


Client:

Site:

Test No: TP3

1.32Length (m) = 2.70 1.33Width (m) = 0.60 1.32Depth (m) = 2.00 1.33

1

Time (min) Depth (m) 1.620

0 1.320 3.864

1 1.330 0.008

2 1.330

5 1.330

10 1.330 120 1.330 5

pit collapse


Void ratio =

Soil infiltration rate, f, (m/s) = NA

Input by: JST Date: 03/11/2015

1) Pit sides collapsed after 30 minutes of testing. 2) Insufficient loss of water to calculate representative infiltration rate

Notes

Depth at start of test =

Depth at end of test =75% effective depth =25% effective depth =

Base area of pit (m2) =

Eff area of loss 75 - 25% (m2) =

Volume outflow 75 - 25% (m3) =

Size of Soakaway

Checked by: Date: 29/11/2015

CALCULATION OF SOIL INFILTRATION RATE


BSP Consulting

J1425Job No:


1.000

1.200

1.400

1.600

1.800

2.000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200

Dep

th (

m)

Time (mins)



MJH/J1425/D1/1



Appendix C

Laboratory Test Results

Contract no:

Contract name:

Client reference:

Clients name:

Clients address:

Samples received:

Analysis started:

Analysis completed:

Report issued:

Notes:

Key:

I/S Insufficient sample to carry out test

N/S Sample not suitable for testing

Approved by:

Karan Campbell John Campbell Dave BowerbankDirector Director Customer Services Co-ordinator

ANALYTICAL TEST REPORT

57446

Hykeham Community Hub

-

Belper

Derbyshire

DE56 2TH

2531

Emcus

NAD No Asbestos Detected

06 November 2015

Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the UKAS accreditation scope.

Methods, procedures and performance data are available on request.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, withour prior written approval.

U UKAS accredited test

Unit 6 Parkhead, Greencroft Industrial Park, Stanley, County Durham, DH9 7YB

Tel 01207 528578 Fax 01207 529977 Email [email protected]

Vat Reg No. 772 5703 18 Registered in England number 4284013

05 November 2015

Samples will be disposed of 6 weeks from initial receipt unless otherwise instructed.

Unless otherwise stated, Chemtech Environmental Ltd was not responsible for sampling.

M MCERTS & UKAS accredited test

Results reported herein relate only to the material supplied to the laboratory.

$ Test carried out by an approved subcontractor

42 Mount Pleasant Drive

30 October 2015

30 October 2015

CE709 Test Report Issue 8 October 2015

Page 1 of 5 Pages

Chemtech Environmental Limited

SAMPLE INFORMATION

MCERTS (Soils):

Lab ref Sample id Depth (m) Sample description Material removed % Removed % Moisture

57446-1 TP1 0.20 Sandy Loam with Gravel & Roots - - 7.8

57446-2 TP1 0.60 Sand with Gravel - - 4.3

57446-3 TP5 0.20 Loamy Sand with Gravel & Roots - - 12.3

57446-4 TP5 0.50 Sand with Gravel - - 6.7

All results are reported on a dry basis. Samples dried at no more than 30°C in a drying cabinet.

Analytical results are inclusive of stones.

Soil descriptions are only intended to provide a log of sample matrices with respect to MCERTS validation. They are not intended

as full geological descriptions. MCERTS accreditation applies for sand, clay and loam/topsoil, or combinations of these whether

these are derived from naturally occurring soils or from made ground, as long as these materials constitute the major part of the

sample. Other materials such as concrete, gravel and brick are not accredited if they comprise the major part of the sample.

57446


-


Page 2 of 5 Pages


SOILS

Lab number 57446-1 57446-2 57446-3 57446-4

Sample id TP1 TP1 TP5 TP5

Depth (m) 0.20 0.60 0.20 0.50

Date sampled 29/10/2015 29/10/2015 29/10/2015 29/10/2015

Test Method Units

Arsenic (total) CE127 M mg/kg As 4.3 3.0 3.5 3.4

Boron (water soluble) CE063 M mg/kg B 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.3

Cadmium (total) CE127 M mg/kg Cd <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Chromium (total) CE127 M mg/kg Cr 90 80 59 84

Chromium (VI) CE050 mg/kg CrVI <1 <1 <1 <1

Copper (total) CE127 M mg/kg Cu 6.2 3.9 6.8 3.3

Lead (total) CE127 M mg/kg Pb 9.8 7.1 12 6.8

Mercury (total) CE127 M mg/kg Hg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Nickel (total) CE127 M mg/kg Ni 6.5 6.6 6.3 5.6

Selenium (total) CE127 M mg/kg Se 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3

Zinc (total) CE127 M mg/kg Zn 18 7.8 20 5.7

pH CE004 M units 7.6 7.9 7.5 7.7

Sulphate (2:1 water soluble) CE061 M mg/l SO4 36 13 40 41

Sulphate (total) CE062 M mg/kg SO4 410 91 559 83

Sulphide CE079 mg/kg S2- <10 <10 <10 <10

Cyanide (free) CE077 mg/kg CN <1 <1 <1 <1

Cyanide (total) CE077 M mg/kg CN <1 <1 <1 <1

Thiocyanate CE014 M mg/kg SCN 6.6 1.8 7.3 1.4

Phenols (total) CE078 mg/kg PhOH <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) CE072 M % w/w C 1.20 0.11 1.99 0.10

Estimate of OMC (calculated from TOC) CE072 M % w/w 2.06 0.19 3.43 0.17

PAH

Naphthalene CE087 M mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Acenaphthylene CE087 M mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Acenaphthene CE087 M mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Fluorene CE087 U mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Phenanthrene CE087 M mg/kg 0.03 <0.02 0.02 <0.02

Anthracene CE087 U mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Fluoranthene CE087 M mg/kg 0.07 <0.02 0.06 <0.02

Pyrene CE087 M mg/kg 0.06 <0.02 0.06 <0.02

Benzo(a)anthracene CE087 U mg/kg 0.05 <0.02 0.04 <0.02

Chrysene CE087 M mg/kg 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.02

Benzo(b)fluoranthene CE087 M mg/kg 0.05 <0.02 0.06 <0.02

Benzo(k)fluoranthene CE087 M mg/kg 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Benzo(a)pyrene CE087 U mg/kg 0.03 <0.02 0.03 <0.02

Indeno(123cd)pyrene CE087 M mg/kg 0.04 <0.02 0.04 <0.02

Dibenz(ah)anthracene CE087 M mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Benzo(ghi)perylene CE087 M mg/kg 0.04 <0.02 0.04 <0.02

PAH (total of USEPA 16) CE087 mg/kg 0.46 <0.27 0.42 <0.27

Subcontracted analysis

Asbestos (qualitative) $ - NAD - NAD -

57446


-


Page 3 of 5 Pages


METHOD DETAILS

METHOD SOILS METHOD SUMMARY SAMPLE STATUS LOD UNITS

CE127 Arsenic (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 1 mg/kg As

CE063 Boron (water soluble) Hot water extract, ICP-OES Dry M 0.5 mg/kg B

CE127 Cadmium (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 0.2 mg/kg Cd

CE127 Chromium (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 1 mg/kg Cr

CE050 Chromium (VI) Acid extraction, Colorimetry Dry 1 mg/kg CrVI

CE127 Copper (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 1 mg/kg Cu

CE127 Lead (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 1 mg/kg Pb

CE127 Mercury (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 0.5 mg/kg Hg

CE127 Nickel (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 1 mg/kg Ni

CE127 Selenium (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 0.3 mg/kg Se

CE127 Zinc (total) Aqua regia digest, ICP-MS Dry M 5 mg/kg Zn

CE004 pH Based on BS 1377, pH Meter Wet M - units

CE061 Sulphate (2:1 water soluble) Aqueous extraction, ICP-OES Dry M 10 mg/l SO4

CE062 Sulphate (total) Acid extraction, ICP-OES Dry M 100 mg/kg SO4

CE079 Sulphide Extraction, Continuous Flow Colorimetry Wet 10 mg/kg S2-

CE077 Cyanide (free) Extraction, Continuous Flow Colorimetry Wet 1 mg/kg CN

CE077 Cyanide (total) Extraction, Continuous Flow Colorimetry Wet M 1 mg/kg CN

CE014 Thiocyanate Weak acid extraction, Colorimetry Dry M 1 mg/kg SCN

CE078 Phenols (total) Extraction, Continuous Flow Colorimetry Wet 0.5 mg/kg PhOH

CE072 Total Organic Carbon (TOC)Removal of IC by acidification, Carbon

AnalyserDry M 0.1 % w/w C

CE072 Estimate of OMC (calculated from TOC) Calculation from Total Organic Carbon Dry M 0.1 % w/w

CE001 Moisture Content Gravimetry Wet 0.1 % w/w

CE087 Naphthalene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.01 mg/kg

CE087 Acenaphthylene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.01 mg/kg

CE087 Acenaphthene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.01 mg/kg

CE087 Fluorene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet U 0.01 mg/kg

CE087 Phenanthrene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Anthracene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet U 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Fluoranthene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Pyrene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Benzo(a)anthracene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet U 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Chrysene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.01 mg/kg

CE087 Benzo(b)fluoranthene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Benzo(k)fluoranthene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Benzo(a)pyrene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet U 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Indeno(123cd)pyrene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Dibenz(ah)anthracene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 Benzo(ghi)perylene Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet M 0.02 mg/kg

CE087 PAH (total of USEPA 16) Solvent extraction, GC-MS Wet 0.27 mg/kg

$ Asbestos (qualitative) HSG 248, Microscopy Dry U - -

57446


-


Page 4 of 5 Pages


DEVIATING SAMPLE INFORMATION

Comments

Sample deviation is determined in accordance with the UKAS note "Guidance on Deviating Samples" and

based on reference standards and laboratory trials.

For samples identified as deviating, test result(s) may be compromised and may not be representative of

the sample at the time of sampling.

Environmental Ltd did not undertake the sampling. Such samples may be deviating.

Key

N No (not deviating sample)

Y Yes (deviating sample)

A Sampling date not provided

B Sampling time not provided (waters only)

C Sample exceeded holding time(s)

D Sample not received in appropriate containers

E Headspace present in sample container

F Sample not chemically fixed (where appropriate)

G Sample not cooled

H Other (specify)

Lab ref Sample id Depth (m) Deviating Tests (Reason for deviation)

57446-1 TP1 0.20 N

57446-2 TP1 0.60 N

57446-3 TP5 0.20 N

57446-4 TP5 0.50 N

Chemtech Environmental Ltd cannot be held responsible for the integrity of sample(s) received if Chemtech

57446


-


Page 5 of 5 Pages

Page 1 of 1

For the attention of

Dear Sirs

Our ref

Your Ref

Project

1 ~

2 1

3 1

Marcus Hanford

Item No

email: [email protected]

web: www.geolabs.co.uk

Emcus Limited

GEO / 23364

HYKEHAM COMMUNITY HUB

J1425

Description

GEOLABS Limited

Unit D3 HRS Business Park

Granby Avenue

Birmingham

B33 0SJ

J A Reynolds

Particle Size Distribution

Tel: +44(0) 121 296 4600Fax: +44(0) 121 296 459942 Mount Pleasant Drive

Belper

Derbyshire

DE56 2TH

Issue No : 01

Geotechnical Test Summary

Test

Quantity

Liquid & Plastic Limits

24 November 2015

Laboratory Manager

on behalf of GEOLABS Limited

Yours faithfully

Further to your instructions we have pleasure in enclosing the results of the tests you requested in the attached figures.

Any opinions or interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation. All the necessary data required by the documented test procedures has been recorded and will be stored for a period of no less than 6 years. This data will be issued to yourselves at your request. All samples will be disposed of after a period of 28 days from the date of this report. Written confirmation will be required to retain the samples beyond this period and a storage charge may be applied. We trust that the above meets your requirements and should you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

"Geolabs" and the Geolabs logo are registered trademarks in the name of Geolabs Limited

Registered Office: Bucknalls Lane Garston Watford Hertfordshire WD25 9XX Registered in England and Wales No: 3177641

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

Mg/m

³M

g/m

³kP

akP

akP

a(g

/L)

(mg/L

)

B B22

37

14

23

78

Sam

ple

type:

B (

Bulk

dis

turb

.) B

LK

(B

lock)

C (

Core

) D

(D

istu

rbed)

LB

(Larg

e B

ulk

dis

t.)

U (

Undis

turb

ed

)

Pro

ject N

um

ber:

Pro

ject N

am

e:

(Ref 38732.7

1190)

Labora

tory

Manager

24/1

1/2

015

Devia

tor

Str

ess

Shear

Str

ess

pH

2:1

W/S

SO

4

W/S

Mg

Page 1

of 1

Clie

nt

: E

mcus L

imited, 42 M

ount P

leasant

Drive, B

elp

er,

Derb

yshire

Oth

er

tests

and c

om

ments

MC

LL

PL

PI

<425

µm

Bulk

TP

50.8

0S

oft b

row

n m

ottle

d g

rey s

ilty

sandy C

LA

Y w

ith

som

e g

ravel. G

ravel is

fin

e t

o c

oars

e.

TP

11.0

0B

row

n c

layey S

AN

D w

ith s

om

e g

ravel. G

ravel is

fine t

o m

ediu

m.

Part

icle

Siz

e D

istr

ibution

Test

Report

By

GE

OLA

BS

Lim

ited

U

nit D

3 H

RS

Busin

ess P

ark

, G

ranby A

venue,

Birm

ingham

, B

33 0

SJ

Checked a

nd A

ppro

ved b

y

GE

O /

23364

HY

KE

HA

M C

OM

MU

NIT

Y H

UB

J1

42

5

Bore

hole

/

Trial P

it

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F G

EO

TE

CH

NIC

AL

TE

ST

ING

Sam

ple

deta

ilsC

lassific

ation T

ests

Density T

ests

Undra

ined T

riaxia

l C

om

pre

ssio

nC

hem

ical T

ests

Sam

ple

Ref

Depth

(m)

Type

Description

Dry

Cell

Pre

ssure

Labora

tory

Manager

Preparation :

%

%

%

%

Plasticity Index :

%

1220 -

LLP

L T

P5 0

0.8

0 B

- 2

3364-2

06013.X

LS

MG

L:V

ers

ion 1

.67 -

01/1

0/2

015

Liquid & Plastic LimitsBS1377 : Part 2 : 1990 Clauses 4.4 & 5

Description:

Soft brown mottled grey silty sandy CLAY with some gravel.

Gravel is fine to coarse.

Sample washed and air dried


J1425

Hole ID

Depth (m)

Sample Type

TP5

0.80

B

23

Test Report By GEOLABS Limited Unit D3 HRS Business Park, Granby Avenue, Birmingham, B33 0SJ

Client : Emcus Limited, 42 Mount Pleasant Drive, Belper, Derbyshire

Page 1 of 1

(Ref 38732.71199)

Laboratory Manager

24/11/2015

Checked and Approved by:

GEO / 23364

Project Name:

Project Number:

Water Content : (BS EN ISO 17892-1:2014)

Percentage passing 425µm sieve :

Liquid Limit :

Plastic Limit :

Equivalent Water Content of material passing 425µm sieve : 28

14

37

21.8

78

Liquidity Index : 0.61

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Pla

sticity Index

Liquid Limit (%)

M L M I M H M V M E

C L C I C H C V C E

Description

Project Number:

BS1377:Part 2:1990 Clause 9.2 - Wet Sieving

1262 -

PS

D T

P1 0

1.0

0 B

- 2

3364-2

06012.X

LS

MG

L:V

ers

ion 1

.34 -

09/1

0/2

015

BS1377 : Part 2 : Clause 9 : 1990

PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

BH / TP No.

Depth (m)

Sample Type

TP1

1.00

B

Brown clayey SAND with some gravel. Gravel is fine to medium.

Sieve

Size % pass

200.0 mm 100

125.0 mm 100

90.0 mm 100

75.0 mm 100

63.0 mm 100

50.0 mm 100

37.5 mm 100

28.0 mm 100

20.0 mm 100

14.0 mm 94

10.0 mm 91

6.30 mm 88

5.00 mm 88

3.35 mm 88

2.00 mm 87

1.18 mm 87

600 µm 86

425 µm 79

300 µm 64

Sand 59

150 µm 39

63 µm 28

Particle Proportions

Page 1 of 1

Client : Emcus Limited, 42 Mount Pleasant Drive, Belper, Derbyshire (Ref 38732.71214)

Checked and Approved by

Laboratory Manager

24/11/2015

GEO / 23364

Project Name:


J1425

Test Report By GEOLABS Limited Unit D3 HRS Business Park, Granby Avenue, Birmingham, B33 0SJ

Silt & Clay 28

212 µm 47

Cobbles 0

Gravel 13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Perc

enta

ge P

assin

g

Particle Size (mm)

SILT SAND GRAVEL

Fine Fine Fine Medium Coarse Medium Coarse Medium Coarse CO

BB

LE

S

CL

AY

0.002 mm 0.0063 mm 0.02 mm 0.063 mm 0.2 mm 0.63 mm 2 mm 6.3 mm 20 mm 63 mm

MJH/J1425/D1/1



Appendix D

Waste Classification Report

www.hazwasteonline.com SPHKA-ABY53-GXRCX Page 1 of 14

Waste Classification Report

SPHKA-ABY53-GXRCX

Job name

J1425

Waste Stream

Emcus_Default_Soil_Chemtech

Comments

Project

Sports Pavilion

Site


Classified by

Name:

Hanford, MarcusDate:

01/12/2015 17:31 UTCTelephone:

07913 740 475

Company:

Emcus Limited

42 Mount Pleasant Drive

Belper

DE56 2TH

Report

Created by: Hanford, Marcus

Created date: 01/12/2015 17:31 UTC

Job summary

# Sample Name Depth [m] Classification Result Hazardous properties Page

1 TP1 0.2 Non Hazardous 2

2 TP 1 0.6 Non Hazardous 4

3 TP5 0.2 Non Hazardous 7

4 TP 5 0.5 Non Hazardous 9

Appendices Page

Appendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands 12

Appendix B: Notes 13

Appendix C: Version 14

Report created by Hanford, Marcus on 01/12/2015

Page 2 of 14 SPHKA-ABY53-GXRCX www.hazwasteonline.com

Classification of sample: TP1

Non Hazardous Waste

Classified as 17 05 04

in the List of Waste

Sample details

Sample Name:

TP1Sample Depth:

0.2 m

Moisture content: 0%(no correction)

LoW Code:

Chapter: 17: Construction and Demolition Wastes (including

excavated soil from contaminated sites)Entry: 17 05 04 (Soil and stones other than those mentioned in

17 05 03)

Hazard properties

None identified

Determinands (Moisture content: 0%, no correction)

arsenic trioxide: (Cation conc. entered: 4.3 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:5.677 mg/kg or 0.000568%)

boron tribromide/trichloride/trifluoride (combined): (Cation conc. entered: 0.7 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:9.401

mg/kg or 0.00094%)

cadmium sulfide: (Cation conc. entered: 0.2 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:0.257 mg/kg or 0.0000257%, Note 1

conc.: 0.00002%)

chromium(III) oxide: (Cation conc. entered: 90 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:131.54 mg/kg or 0.0132%)

chromium (VI) compounds, with the exception of barium chromate and of compounds specified elsewhere in this Annex:

(Cation conc. entered: 1 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:1.923 mg/kg or 0.000192%)

copper (I) oxide: (Cation conc. entered: 6.2 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:6.981 mg/kg or 0.000698%)

lead chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 9.8 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:15.286 mg/kg or 0.00153%, Note 1

conc.: 0.00098%)

mercury dichloride: (Cation conc. entered: 0.5 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:0.677 mg/kg or 0.0000677%)

nickel dihydroxide: (Cation conc. entered: 6.5 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:10.267 mg/kg or 0.00103%)

selenium compounds with the exception of cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex: (

Cation conc. entered: 0.3 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:0.766 mg/kg or 0.0000766%)

zinc chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 18 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:49.935 mg/kg or 0.00499%)

pH: (Whole conc. entered as: 7.6 pH, converted to conc.:7.6 pH or 7.6 pH)

salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides and mercuric

oxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex: (Cation conc. entered: 1 mg/kg, converted to compound

conc.:1.884 mg/kg or 0.000188%)

phenol: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.5 mg/kg or 0.00005%)

naphthalene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.01 mg/kg or 0.000001%)

acenaphthylene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.01 mg/kg or 0.000001%)

acenaphthene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.01 mg/kg or 0.000001%)

fluorene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.01 mg/kg or 0.000001%)

phenanthrene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.03 mg/kg or 0.000003%)

anthracene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.02 mg/kg or 0.000002%)

fluoranthene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.07 mg/kg or 0.000007%)

pyrene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.06 mg/kg or 0.000006%)

benzo[a]anthracene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.05 mg/kg or 0.000005%)

chrysene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.07 mg/kg or 0.000007%)

benzo[b]fluoranthene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.05 mg/kg or 0.000005%)

benzo[k]fluoranthene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.03 mg/kg or 0.000003%)

benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.03 mg/kg or 0.000003%)

indeno[123-cd]pyrene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.04 mg/kg or 0.000004%)

dibenz[a,h]anthracene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.02 mg/kg or 0.000002%)



benzo[ghi]perylene: (Whole conc. entered as: 0.04 mg/kg or 0.000004%)

Test Settings

HP 12 on EUH032: Force this test to non hazardous because: "Unlikely to gas"

Notes utilised in assessment

C14: Step 5

"identify whether any individual ecotoxic substance is present at or above a cut-off value ..." , used on:

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "arsenic trioxide"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "chromium(III) oxide"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "chromium (VI) compounds, with the

exception of barium chromate and of compounds specified elsewhere in this Annex"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "copper (I) oxide"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "lead chromate"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "mercury dichloride"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "nickel dihydroxide"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "selenium compounds with the exception of

cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "zinc chromate"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "salts of hydrogen cyanide with the

exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides and mercuric oxycyanide and those specified

elsewhere in this Annex"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "naphthalene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "acenaphthene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "fluorene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "phenanthrene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "anthracene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "fluoranthene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "pyrene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "benzo[a]anthracene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "chrysene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "benzo[b]fluoranthene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "benzo[k]fluoranthene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "benzo[a]pyrene; benzo[def]chrysene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "dibenz[a,h]anthracene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "benzo[ghi]perylene"

Test: "HP 14 on R50, R52, R50/53, R51/53, R53, R52/53" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Determinand notes

Note 1 , used on:

determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

determinand: "lead chromate"

Note A , used on:

determinand: "chromium (VI) compounds, with the exception of barium chromate and of compounds specified


determinand: "selenium compounds with the exception of cadmium sulphoselenide and those specified elsewhere in

this Annex"

determinand: "zinc chromate"

determinand: "salts of hydrogen cyanide with the exception of complex cyanides such as ferrocyanides, ferricyanides

and mercuric oxycyanide and those specified elsewhere in this Annex"



Classification of sample: TP 1

Non Hazardous Waste



Sample details

Sample Name:

TP 1Sample Depth:

0.6 m


LoW Code:



17 05 03)

Hazard properties

None identified


arsenic trioxide: (Cation conc. entered: 3 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:3.961 mg/kg or 0.000396%)


mg/kg or 0.00094%)


conc.: 0.00002%)






conc.: 0.00071%)





zinc chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 7.8 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:21.638 mg/kg or 0.00216%)




conc.:1.884 mg/kg or 0.000188%)




















Test Settings



C14: Step 5































Note 1 , used on:

Test: "HP 5 on STOT SE 1; H370, STOT RE 1; H372" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"


Test: "HP 6 on Acute Tox. 4; H302" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 7 on Carc. 1A; H350, Carc. 1A; H350i, Carc. 1B; H350, Carc. 1B; H350i" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 10 on Repr. 1A; H360, Repr. 1A; H360F, Repr. 1A; H360D, Repr. 1A; H360FD, Repr. 1A; H360Fd, Repr. 1A;

H360Df, Repr. 1B; H360, Repr. 1B; H360F, Repr. 1B; H360D, Repr. 1B; H360FD, Repr. 1B; H360Fd, Repr. 1B; H360Df"

for determinand: "lead chromate"

Test: "HP 10 on Repr. 2; H361, Repr. 2; H361f, Repr. 2; H361d, Repr. 2; H361fd" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 11 on Muta. 2; H341" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"


Determinand notes

Note 1 , used on:



Note A , used on:






this Annex"






Classification of sample: TP5

Non Hazardous Waste



Sample details

Sample Name:

TP5Sample Depth:

0.2 m


LoW Code:



17 05 03)

Hazard properties

None identified



boron tribromide/trichloride/trifluoride (combined): (Cation conc. entered: 0.9 mg/kg, converted to compound

conc.:12.087 mg/kg or 0.00121%)


conc.: 0.00002%)





lead chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 12 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:18.718 mg/kg or 0.00187%, Note 1 conc.:

0.0012%)





zinc chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 20 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:55.483 mg/kg or 0.00555%)




conc.:1.884 mg/kg or 0.000188%)




















Test Settings



C14: Step 5































Determinand notes

Note 1 , used on:



Note A , used on:




this Annex"






Classification of sample: TP 5

Non Hazardous Waste



Sample details

Sample Name:

TP 5Sample Depth:

0.5 m


LoW Code:



17 05 03)

Hazard properties

None identified




mg/kg or 0.000403%)


conc.: 0.00002%)






conc.: 0.00068%)





zinc chromate: (Cation conc. entered: 5.7 mg/kg, converted to compound conc.:15.813 mg/kg or 0.00158%)




conc.:1.884 mg/kg or 0.000188%)



















Test Settings



C14: Step 5






























Note 1 , used on:



Test: "HP 6 on Acute Tox. 4; H302" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 7 on Carc. 1A; H350, Carc. 1A; H350i, Carc. 1B; H350, Carc. 1B; H350i" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 10 on Repr. 1A; H360, Repr. 1A; H360F, Repr. 1A; H360D, Repr. 1A; H360FD, Repr. 1A; H360Fd, Repr. 1A;

H360Df, Repr. 1B; H360, Repr. 1B; H360F, Repr. 1B; H360D, Repr. 1B; H360FD, Repr. 1B; H360Fd, Repr. 1B; H360Df"

for determinand: "lead chromate"

Test: "HP 10 on Repr. 2; H361, Repr. 2; H361f, Repr. 2; H361d, Repr. 2; H361fd" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"

Test: "HP 11 on Muta. 2; H341" for determinand: "cadmium sulfide"


Determinand notes

Note 1 , used on:



Note A , used on:






this Annex"






Appendix A: Classifier defined and non CLP determinands

boron tribromide/trichloride/trifluoride (combined) (CAS Number: 10294-33-4, 10294-34-5, 7637-07-2)

Conversion factor: 13.43

Comments: Combines the hazard statements and the average of the conversion factors for boron tribromide, boron

trichloride and boron trifluoride

Data source: N/A

Data source date: 06/08/2015

Risk Phrases: R14, T+; R26/28, C; R34, C; R35

Hazard Statements: EUH014, Acute Tox. 2; H330, Acute Tox. 2; H300, Skin Corr. 1A; H314, Skin Corr. 1B; H314

chromium(III) oxide (CAS Number: 1308-38-9)

Conversion factor: 1.462

Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database

Data source: http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/cl-inventory-database


Risk Phrases: R20, R22, R36, R37, R38, R42, R43, R50/53, R60, R61

Hazard Statements: Acute Tox. 4; H332, Acute Tox. 4; H302, Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335, Skin Irrit. 2; H315,

Resp. Sens. 1; H334, Skin Sens. 1; H317, Repr. 1B; H360FD, Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1; H410

pH

Comments: Appendix C4

Data source: WM3 1st Edition 2015


Risk Phrases: None.

Hazard Statements: None.

acenaphthylene (CAS Number: 208-96-8)




Risk Phrases: R22, R26, R27, R36, R37, R38

Hazard Statements: Acute Tox. 4; H302, Acute Tox. 1; H330, Acute Tox. 1; H310, Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335,

Skin Irrit. 2; H315

acenaphthene (CAS Number: 83-32-9)




Risk Phrases: R36, R37, R38, N; R50/53, N; R51/53

Hazard Statements: Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335, Skin Irrit. 2; H315, Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1;

H410, Aquatic Chronic 2; H411

fluorene (CAS Number: 86-73-7)




Risk Phrases: N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1; H410

phenanthrene (CAS Number: 85-01-8)




Risk Phrases: R22, R36, R37, R38, R40, R43, N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Acute Tox. 4; H302, Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335, Carc. 2; H351, Skin Sens. 1; H317,

Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1; H410, Skin Irrit. 2; H315



anthracene (CAS Number: 120-12-7)




Risk Phrases: R36, R37, R38, R43, N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335, Skin Irrit. 2; H315, Skin Sens. 1; H317, Aquatic Acute 1; H400,

Aquatic Chronic 1; H410

fluoranthene (CAS Number: 206-44-0)




Risk Phrases: Xn; R22, N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Acute Tox. 4; H302, Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1; H410

pyrene (CAS Number: 129-00-0)

Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 2014



Risk Phrases: Xi; R36/37/38, N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Skin Irrit. 2; H315, Eye Irrit. 2; H319, STOT SE 3; H335, Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1;

H410

indeno[123-cd]pyrene (CAS Number: 193-39-5)




Risk Phrases: R40

Hazard Statements: Carc. 2; H351

benzo[ghi]perylene (CAS Number: 191-24-2)

Comments: Data from C&L Inventory Database; SDS Sigma Aldrich 28/02/2015



Risk Phrases: N; R50/53

Hazard Statements: Aquatic Acute 1; H400, Aquatic Chronic 1; H410

Appendix B: Notes

C14: Step 5

from section: WM3: C14 in the document: "WM3 - Waste Classification"

"identify whether any individual ecotoxic substance is present at or above a cut-off value ..."

Note 1

from section: 1.1.3.2, Annex VI in the document: "CLP Regulations"

"The concentration stated or, in the absence of such concentrations, the generic concentrations of this Regulation (Table

3.1) or the generic concentrations of Directive 1999/45/EC (Table 3.2), are the percentages by weight of the metallic

element calculated with reference to the total weight of the mixture."

Note A

from section: 1.1.3.1, Annex VI in the document: "CLP Regulations"

"Without prejudice to Article 17(2), the name of the substance must appear on the label in the form of one of the

designations given in Part 3. In Part 3, use is sometimes made of a general description such as ‘... compounds’ or ‘...

salts’. In this case, the supplier is required to state on the label the correct name, due account being taken of section

1.1.1.4."



Appendix C: Version

Classification utilises the following:

• CLP Regulations - Regulation 1272/2008/EC of 16 December 2008

• 1st ATP - Regulation 790/2009/EC of 10 August 2009

• 2nd ATP - Regulation 286/2011/EC of 10 March 2011

• 3rd ATP - Regulation 618/2012/EU of 10 July 2012

• 4th ATP - Regulation 487/2013/EU of 8 May 2013

• Correction to 1st ATP - Regulation 758/2013/EU of 7 August 2013

• 5th ATP - Regulation 944/2013/EU of 2 October 2013

• 6th ATP - Regulation 605/2014/EU of 5 June 2014

• WFD Annex III replacement - Regulation 1357/2014/EU of 18 December 2014

• Revised List of Wastes 2014 - Decision 2014/955/EU of 18 December 2014

• WM3 - Waste Classification - May 2015

• 7th ATP - Regulation 2015/1221/EU of 24 July 2015

• POPs Regulation 2004 - Regulation 850/2004/EC of 29 April 2004

• 1st ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 756/2010/EU of 24 August 2010

• 2nd ATP to POPs Regulation - Regulation 757/2010/EU of 24 August 2010

HazWasteOnline Engine: WM3 1st Edition, May 2015

HazWasteOnline Engine Version: 2015.308.2983.5979 (04 Nov 2015)

HazWasteOnline Database: 2015.308.2983.5979 (04 Nov 2015)

Documents

Ref. No.: MJH/J1387/D1/1 - Lincolnshire County Councilparishes.lincolnshire.gov.uk/Files/Parish/35/4D_Site_Investigation.pdf · Ref. No.: MJH/J1387/D1/1 Date: November 2015