13
IEEE802.3bt 4-Pair Power over Ethernet Task Force Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1 Jan 2014 Yair Darshan Microsemi [email protected]

Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

IEEE802.3bt 4-Pair Power over Ethernet Task Force

Reducing MPS power during STBY statePart 1

Jan 2014

Yair Darshan Microsemi

[email protected]

Page 2: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� Analyzing the effects of reducing MPS pulse width

from 75msec to lower value in order to reduce STBY

average power.

2

Objectives

Page 3: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� There is a need presented by lighting vendor(s) for lighting systems to reduce power during STBY.

� In addition, reducing STBY power is a good feature in any system today or in the future which is the incentive for proposals to modify MPS parameters.

� The proposal that we are discussing now, suggests to reduce the MPS power by reducing MPS duty cycle which will result with reducing the average power.

� The average power is Ihold*TMPS/(TMPS+TPMPDO).

� The focus is reducing TMPS.

� This presentation investigates the implications of reducing TMPS.

Background

3

Page 4: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

Detected MPS in legacy devices- No noise

4

• TMPS: Pulse width=75ms

• This is how it looks when detected at PSE

• No noise. Ideal environment.

• Cpd=180uF, tr/tf :~13.6msec/19msec.

• Signal Vpp~=3mV over 0.3ohm with 10mA MPS over Mode A or B.

• Easy to handle.

Time

0s 40ms 80ms 120ms 160ms 200ms 240ms 280ms 320ms 360ms 400ms 440ms 480ms 520ms 560ms 600msV(R5:2)

0V

0.5mV

1.0mV

1.5mV

2.0mV

2.5mV

3.0mV

Page 5: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

• TMPS: Pulse width=75ms

• This is how it looks when detected at PSE

• Noise: 2mVpp. 1us/50us/1us/100us.

• Signal Vpp~=3mV over 0.3ohm with 10mA MPS over Mode A or B.

• Still easy to handle. Pulse width>75ms.

• Information frequency << Noise Frequency

• Easy to extract the information.

Detected MPS in legacy devices with some GND noise

5

Time

0s 40ms 80ms 120ms 160ms 200ms 240ms 280ms 320ms 360ms 400ms 440ms 480ms 520ms 560ms 600ms

V(R5:2)

0V

1.0mV

2.0mV

3.0mV

4.0mV

5.0mV

Page 6: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

• TMPS: Pulse width=10ms

• This is how it looks when detected at PSE

• No noise.

• Cpd=180uF, tr/tf :~13.6msec/19msec.

• Signal Vpp~=1.8mV over 0.3ohm with 10mA MPS over Mode A or B.

• This is an issue to address.

– (a) detected pulse in PSE is shorter than PD TMPS.

– (b) lower pulse amplitude (2-3 times smaller)

– (c) To re-evaluate the cost effectiveness of shorter MPS pulses.

Detected MPS in legacy devices- No noise.

6

Time

0s 40ms 80ms 120ms 160ms 200ms 240ms 280ms 320ms 360ms 400ms 440ms 480ms 520ms 560ms 600ms

V(R5:2)

0V

0.5mV

1.0mV

1.5mV

Page 7: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

Detected MPS in legacy devices with GND noise

7

• TMPS: Pulse width=10ms

• This is how it looks when detected at PSE

• No noise.

• Cpd=180uF, tr/tf :~13.6msec/19msec.

• Signal Vpp~=1.8mV over 0.3ohm with 10mA MPS over Mode A or B.

• This is a potential higher level problem to address.

– (a) detected pulse in PSE is shorter than PD TMPS.

– (b) lower pulse amplitude (2-3 times smaller)

– (c) Cost effectiveness of shorter MPS pulses is questionable.

Time

0s 40ms 80ms 120ms 160ms 200ms 240ms 280ms 320ms 360ms 400ms 440ms 480ms 520ms 560ms 600ms

V(R5:2)

0V

1.0mV

2.0mV

3.0mV

4.0mV

Page 8: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� Cpd and PD MPS modulator impedance forms slow time constant that distorted the MPS shape received at the PSE.

� It can be seen by very long tr/tf values of the detected pulse.

� It means that if PD MPS is 5msec or 10msec etc. most of it is attenuated by tr/tf=14-19msc > 5-10msc.

� As a results, longer MPS may be required for cost effective detection and reliable detection in a typical noise environment (which is TBD).

Problem Root-cause

8

Page 9: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� Much bigger problem.

� To reduce Cps for lighting applications? – Needs further work.

What if Cpd>180uF

9

Page 10: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� With the current 75msec MPS a resolution of 4ms was sufficient.

� For 5msec, we need 1msec resolution.

� It is 4 times more gates.

� We need to check if it is cost effective vs. the power saved.

� Since the previous problem is at higher priority we need to resolve it first.

What with Logic gates overhead?

10

Page 11: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

� Using short PD MPS pulse duration <75ms requires careful analysis.

� At 10msec MPS, the detected signal in the PSE is much weaker and distorted.

• It gets worse with some noise around

• It gets even worse with Cpd>180uF.

• It required more gates to get the required resolution.

� We need PSE/PD vendors to address it and check if 5msec under mentioned conditions is cost effective detectable.

Summary

11

Page 12: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

Thank You

12

Page 13: Reducing MPS STBY powergrouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/bt/public/jan14/darshan_02... · 2014. 1. 21. · Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014 There

Reducing MPS power during STBY state Part 1. Yair Darshan , January 2014

Discussion

13