41
Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program Office

Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

Reducing Disparities:The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language

Aligning Forces for Quality National Program Office

Page 2: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

2

Why are we here?

• Understand the role of standardized R/E/L data collection in reducing disparities

• Identify and consider the key decision points to successfully implement standardized R/E/L data collection in your organization

• Obtain knowledge and tools to train staff on the standardized collection of R/E/L data

Page 3: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

3

What will we cover today?

• Building blocks toward equitable care– National health care disparities – Increasing attention R/E/L data– Linking R/E/L data to quality– Using data to drive improvements

• Key Decision Points– Changes at the organizational level

• Nuts and Bolts– Tools to train your staff

Page 4: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

4

What are disparities in health care quality?

• “Racial and ethnic minorities tend to receive a lower quality of healthcare than non-minorities”

• Less likely to receive:– Cancer screening– Cardiovascular therapy– Kidney dialysis– Transplants – Curative surgery for lung cancer– Hip and knee replacement  – Pain medicines in the ER

Page 5: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

5

Growing U.S. minority population

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

Po

pu

lati

on

in

mil

lio

ns

Non-Hispanic White

Other

Population Projections, 2010 to 2050

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 National Population Projections (Supplemental) 4. Projections of the Population by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States: 2010 to 2050

Page 6: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

6

Increasing legislative and regulatory attention to R/E/L

• American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009– Hospitals and providers will need to collect R/E/L data to

be eligible for “meaningful use” incentive payments– Race/Ethnicity follow Office of Management and Budget

guidelines• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

– Health programs receiving federal money are required to collect R/E/L data

• NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home Standards– Points toward recognition earned by collecting and

analyzing R/E/L data• Revised Joint Commission standards

– Expanded requirements related to the collection of patient language data

– New requirement to collect patient-level data on race and ethnicity

Page 7: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

7

Office of Management and Budget

Race and ethnicity categoriesRace• Black• White• Asian• American

Indian/Alaska Native

• Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander

Ethnicity• Hispanic• Not Hispanic

Page 8: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

8

Identifying and addressing disparitiesThree steps

• Standardized collection of self-reported R/E/L data– Categories are standardized

– Patient self-reports

• Stratification and analysis of performance measures– Compare patients within an organization

– Consolidate data to identify community-level trends

• Use of stratified data to identify and develop quality improvement interventions targeted to specific patient populations

Page 9: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

9

National CABG rates

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Whitemen

Blackmen

Jha, NEJM, 2005

Rate

per

1,0

00 M

ed

icare

en

roll

ees

Page 10: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

10

Diabetes Outcomes Better Health Greater Cleveland

http://www.betterhealthcleveland.org/Analysis/Conditions/Diabetes.aspx

Page 11: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

11

Using R/E/L data to drive improvement

Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea Diabetes Project

Identified disparity between white and Latino patients in diabetes control and recommended care

Created culturally competent Diabetes Management Program

Improved mean HbA1c values for all patients, reduced gap between white and Latino patients

Increased overall number of patients with HbA1c test within past 9 months and eliminated disparity

Disparities in Diabetes Control MGH Chelsea Clinic 2005-2007

29

3437

20

2424

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2005 2006 2007% o

f Pat

ient

s in

Poo

r C

ontrol

(H

bA1c

> 8

)

Latino White

Source: Disparities Solution Center at MGH http://dx.confex.com/dx/8/webprogram/Paper2024.html

Page 12: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

12

How else can you use R/E/L data

within your organization?• Provide more patient-centered care

• Develop cultural competency training for staff

• Compare utilization of health services among different patients

• Compare patient satisfaction with care provided among different patients

• Target marketing materials to specific patient populations

• Capture changes in demographic trends

Page 13: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

13

What needs to happen withinyour organization?

• Develop the capacity and infrastructure to collect standardized race, ethnicity and language information from all patients

• This will affect: – Registration system and processes– Staff training and workflow– Patient communications– How data are used to monitor quality

Page 14: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

Key Decision Points inStandardizing Patient Race,

Ethnicityand Language Data

Collection

Page 15: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

15

Key decision points to consider

Where are data currently collected?

Who needs to be engaged? What registration system and

IT modifications need to be made?

How will staff be trained?

Page 16: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

16

Where are data collected?• When scheduling/registering an office visit

– Face-to-face– Written registration forms– Telephone

• Upon admission or registration at the hospital– Face-to-face– Telephone registration

• All points of entry (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, cardiac catheterization lab, etc.)

• “Downstream effect” – Registries and other databases

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

Page 17: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

17

Who needs to be engaged?

• Senior Leadership• Information Technology staff• Registration/Admissions staff• Quality Improvement• Interpreter Services• Clinicians• Patient Advocacy/Diversity Team• Community Relations/Marketing

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

Page 18: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

18

What registration system and IT modifications need to be

made?• Will you need add data fields to

accommodate new categories? – Will you use granular categories?– Can patients choose more than one race?– Will you collect both spoken and written language?

• What is your system’s capacity to add a field?– Can the change be made ‘in-house’ and house-wide?– What departments need to be involved to make changes to

the system? – Is there a need to create combined R/E categories?

• Will these fields be hard stops?

Page 19: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

1919

How will staff be trained?

• Who needs to be trained?• Who will provide training?• How will the training be implemented?

– Role-playing? Handouts/scripts? Screen content?

• Will data be monitored after the training? • How will you monitor staff?

– Will feedback be given?– Will registrars see how data is used?

Page 20: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

20

Anticipating staff concerns

• Patients will get angry• It’s illegal• Patients will get angry• We don’t need to collect this information• Patients will get angry• I’m uncomfortable asking these questions• Patients will get angry• It will take too much time• Patients will get angry

Page 21: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

Nuts and Bolts of Collecting Patient Race,

Ethnicity and Language Data: Staff Training

Page 22: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

22

Purpose of this training

• We are implementing a standardized method of collecting race, ethnicity and language (R/E/L) data as self-reported by patients or their caregivers.

• You are key to ensuring that all data are collected consistently, accurately, professionally, and completely.

Page 23: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

23

Learning Objectives

• After this training session you will be able to:– Describe the reasons for standardizing

the collection of patient R/E/L– Use scripts to ask each patient to self-

identify his/her R/E/L– Address patient questions and concerns

Page 24: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

24

What is standardized data collection?

• Standardized categories across the organization

• Patient self-reports race, ethnicity and language– No more “eyeballing” the

patient– Data is collected from all

patients

Page 25: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

25

Why collect standardized R/E/L data?

• We can ensure adequate interpreter services, patient information materials, cultural competency training for staff.

• We can link patient race, ethnicity and language data with clinical information to improve quality and examine any health care disparities.

• We can use quality improvement tools/techniques to address any health care disparities.

• By collecting this information, we can ensure that all patients receive high-quality care.

Page 26: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

26

“….but we already collect this information!”

• That may be true, but studies examining R/E/L data collection in hospitals and ambulatory practices show:– In many organizations that currently collect

R/E/L data, not everyone is doing a good job.

– Many registrars collect the information by observing the patient and guessing. Allowing the patient to self-identify will lead to more accurate and reliable data.

Page 27: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

27

Challenging assumptions – guess their race

Page 28: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

28

How will the registration process change?

1.Letting your patients know2.Ethnicity3.Race4.Preferred written and

spoken language

These are the recommended questions—your organization may choose to revise this list.

Page 29: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

29

Recommended script for letting patients know

“We want to make sure that all our patients get the best care possible. We would like you to

tell us your racial/ethnic background and preferred language so that we can review the treatment that all patients receive and make sure that everyone gets the highest quality

care.”

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

This is a recommended script —your organization may choose to use a different or revised script.

Page 30: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

30

Recommended script for ethnicity

“First, do you consider yourself Hispanic or Latino?”

YesNoDeclinedUnavailable

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

This is a recommended script —your organization may choose to use a different or revised

script, or use different categories.

If applicable, you can include a screen shot that will show registration staff any changes to the computer screen that staff see during registration

Page 31: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

31

Ethnicity definitions

Hispanic or Latino: Person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American decent, regardless of race.

Non-Hispanic or Latino: Person not of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity.

Declined*: Patient is unwilling to provide an answer to the ethnicity question or cannot identify him/herself as Hispanic or Not Hispanic.

Unavailable*: Patient is physically unable to respond.

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

Page 32: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

32

Recommended script for race

“Which category best describes your race?”

American Indian/Alaska NativeAsianBlack/African AmericanNative Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderWhiteDeclined UnavailableSome other race

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

This is a recommended script —your organization

may choose to use a different or revised script, or

use different categories.

Page 33: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

33

Race definitionsAmerican Indian or Alaska Native: Person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and maintains tribal affiliation.

Asian: Person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent.

Black or African American: Person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: Person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

White: A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 27, 2011

Some Other Race*: A person who does not self-identify with any of the OMB race categories.

Declined*: Patient is unwilling to choose a race category or cannot identify him/herself with one of the listed races.

Unavailable*: Patient is physically unable to respond.* This symbol indicates a modification we have made to the OMB recommendations

Page 34: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

34

Recommended script for patient’s preferred language

“What language do you feel most comfortable speaking with your doctor or nurse?”

English Spanish Other Declined Unavailable

“What language do you feel most comfortable reading medical or health care instructions?”

English Spanish Other Declined Unavailable

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

If your organization is going to use different questions, you can use that text on this slide.

Page 35: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

35

Language definitionsPreferred spoken: the language a patient feels most comfortable speaking with their doctor or nurse Preferred written: the language a patient feels most comfortable reading medical or health care instructionsDeclined: A person who is unwilling to state a language preference.Unavailable: Patient is physically unable to respond.If your organization will not ask preferred written language, you

can remove that text from this slide.

Page 36: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

3636

“I Speak” Poster

Source: Cambridge Health Alliance (Cambridge, MA)

Page 37: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

37

What do patients think?

• Most patients (80%) think hospitals and clinics should be collecting data.

• Most patients (97%) also think it’s important for hospitals and clinics to examine differences in quality.

• Some patients are concerned about how the data will be used.

Baker, DW, et al. Patients’ Attitudes toward Health Care Providers Collecting Information about Their Race and Ethnicity. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Volume 20 (10): 895 – 900. August 2005.

Page 38: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

38

Letting your patients know

Wall Posters

Can be displayed in:• Registration

areas• Waiting

rooms

Page 39: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

39

Addressing patient concerns

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

Patient Response Suggested Response Code

“I'm American."Would you like to use an additional term, or would you like me to just put American?

Other or as specified

"Can't you tell by looking at me?"

Well, usually I can. But sometimes I'm wrong, so we think it is better to let people tell us. I don’t want to put in the wrong answer. I’m trained not to make any assumptions.

As specified 

If using open-ended option: "I don’t know. What are the responses?”

You can say White, Black or African American, Latino or Hispanic, Asian, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander or Native Hawaiian, some other race, or any combination of these. You can also use more specific terms like Irish, Jamaican, Mexican

As specified 

"I was born in Nigeria, but I've really lived here all my life. What should I say?"

That is really up to you. You can use any term you like. It is fine to say that you are Nigerian.

As specified 

Page 40: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

40

Addressing patient concerns

Source: HRET Toolkit, http://www.hretdisparities.org/ accessed on Sept 16, 2009

Patient Response Suggested Response Code

"I'm human." Is that your way of saying that you don’t want to answer the question? If so, I can just say that you didn't want to answer.

Declined

“It’s none of your business.”

I'll just put down that you didn't want to answer, which is fine.

Declined

"Who looks at this?" The only people who see this information are registration staff, administrators for the hospital, and the people involved in quality improvement.

"Are you trying to find out if I'm a US citizen?”

No. Definitely not! Also, you should know that the confidentiality of what you say is protected by law, and we do not share this information with anyone.

Page 41: Reducing Disparities: The Importance of Collecting Standardized Data on Patient Race, Ethnicity and Language Aligning Forces for Quality National Program

41

Acknowledgements

This presentation was adapted from the Health Research and Educational Trust Disparities Toolkit as part of the Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative, supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.