Redistricting in California RedistrictinginCalifornia · RedistrictinginCalifornia Inventory of the Collection of the California Special Masters on Reapportionment 1973 Institute

Redistricting in California

Inventory of the Collection of the California Special Masters on Reapportionment 1973Institute of Governmental Studies Library, UC Berkeley

by Dorothy Simpson and Robert H. McDonald (1975)

Forward - Eugene C. Lee

Preface - Dorothy Simpson

Special Masters on Reapportionment

Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportionment

Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading to Reapportionment

Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of Official Records

Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases

Section 3. Office Files and Working Collection

Section 4. Miscellaneous

Attachment 1. Register of Official Records and Written Presentations, Official Copy

[not included]

Attachment 2. List of Files Containing the Transcript of Testimony Taken at the Various

Hearings [not included]

Redistricting in California

Inventory of the Collection of the California Special Masters on Reapportionment 1973 Institute of Governmental Studies Library, UC Berkeley

by Dorothy Simpson and Robert H. McDonald (1975)

Forward - Eugene C. Lee

Preface - Dorothy Simpson


Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportionment

Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading to Reapportionment

Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of Official Records


Section 3. Office Files and Working Collection

Section 4. Miscellaneous

Attachment 1. Register of Official Records and Written Presentations, Official Copy

[not included]

Attachment 2. List of Files Containing the Transcript of Testimony Taken at the Various

Hearings [not included]

Foreword

The drawing of district boundaries for state legislatures and congressional seats is one of the most significant events inAmerican politics. In California in the 1970's the act proved so intense that the Legislature and the Governor, chargedby the Constitution with establishing new district boundaries following each decennial census, were unable to agreeand-in the words of the Court--reached an impasse.

When the Supreme Court of California was forced to enter the picture, it appointed three Special Masters to holdpublic hearings with respect both to criteria for districting and proposed plans to implement such criteria, and torecommend to the Court plans for possible adoption together with their underlying rationale. This the Mastersproceeded to do, following their appointment in May 1973. Their report was filed with the Supreme Court on August31, 1973, and--with the slightest modifications-adopted by the Court in its decision in November 1973.

In their report, the Masters noted that "A request has been received from the University of California Institute ofGovernmental Studies in Berkeley that its facilities be used as a depository of all material lodged with the Masters,with the understanding that the materials received will be safely stored, catalogued and made available for public andscholarly use." The Masters went on to recommend that "pertinent materials that have been lodged with the Masters bereleased to the Institute," and the Supreme Court approved this recommendation.

The resulting materials, described in the following inventory, do not constitute a complete account of the tumultuoushistory of redistricting in the 1970's. Such an account will have to rely on legislative reports, newspapers andperiodicals, and other testimony not included in the Masters' records. But the Masters' papers do provide an essentialelement in this overall history. It is our hope that this collection will stimulate and aid the necessary scholarship andwriting which will inform the citizenry of the background and implications of both the legislativeexecutive impasseand the Court's resolution of it.

Eugene C. Lee

Preface

The collection of papers deposited in the Institute of Governmental Studies consists of the Register of Official Recordsand Written Presentations, together with the items and exhibits entered on it; legal documents and other informationpresented to or requested by the Masters concerning the consolidated cases and some earlier related cases and efforts atreapportionment; office files; and working papers, maps, etc. produced by the Masters in the course of their work.

In this inventory the material is divided into four sections, with brief introductions explaining the contents and theirarrangement. The "Register of Official Records and Written Presentations" is reproduced as Attachment 1 since it wasthe guide used in identifying and arranging the documents listed in Section 1. The chronologies of legislative efforts atreapportionment and judicial procedures which culminated in the acceptance of the Special Masters' plan by theSupreme Court are presented as background and to provide an indication of other official sources of informationessential to an understanding of the problem.

The work of identifying, organizing and listing the documents was accomplished by Robert H. McDonald, with theassistance of Chris Martiniak and William Goodman, formerly Research Assistants to the Chief Counsel for theSpecial Masters on Reapportionment. In spite of their best efforts they could not identify the source and/or intendedpurpose of some items. These are included in Section 4, Miscellaneous, and described as specifically as availableinformation permits.

Dorothy Simpson

ForewordThe drawing of district boundaries for state legislatures and congressional seats is one of the most significant events inAmerican politics. In California in the 1970's the act proved so intense that the Legislature and the Governor, chargedby the Constitution with establishing new district boundaries following each decennial census, were unable to agreeand-in the words of the Court--reached an impasse.

When the Supreme Court of California was forced to enter the picture, it appointed three Special Masters to holdpublic hearings with respect both to criteria for districting and proposed plans to implement such criteria, and torecommend to the Court plans for possible adoption together with their underlying rationale. This the Mastersproceeded to do, following their appointment in May 1973. Their report was filed with the Supreme Court on August31, 1973, and--with the slightest modifications-adopted by the Court in its decision in November 1973.

In their report, the Masters noted that "A request has been received from the University of California Institute ofGovernmental Studies in Berkeley that its facilities be used as a depository of all material lodged with the Masters,with the understanding that the materials received will be safely stored, catalogued and made available for public andscholarly use." The Masters went on to recommend that "pertinent materials that have been lodged with the Masters bereleased to the Institute," and the Supreme Court approved this recommendation.

The resulting materials, described in the following inventory, do not constitute a complete account of the tumultuoushistory of redistricting in the 1970's. Such an account will have to rely on legislative reports, newspapers andperiodicals, and other testimony not included in the Masters' records. But the Masters' papers do provide an essentialelement in this overall history. It is our hope that this collection will stimulate and aid the necessary scholarship andwriting which will inform the citizenry of the background and implications of both the legislativeexecutive impasseand the Court's resolution of it.

Eugene C. Lee

PrefaceThe collection of papers deposited in the Institute of Governmental Studies consists of the Register of Official Recordsand Written Presentations, together with the items and exhibits entered on it; legal documents and other informationpresented to or requested by the Masters concerning the consolidated cases and some earlier related cases and efforts atreapportionment; office files; and working papers, maps, etc. produced by the Masters in the course of their work.

In this inventory the material is divided into four sections, with brief introductions explaining the contents and theirarrangement. The "Register of Official Records and Written Presentations" is reproduced as Attachment 1 since it wasthe guide used in identifying and arranging the documents listed in Section 1. The chronologies of legislative efforts atreapportionment and judicial procedures which culminated in the acceptance of the Special Masters' plan by theSupreme Court are presented as background and to provide an indication of other official sources of informationessential to an understanding of the problem.

The work of identifying, organizing and listing the documents was accomplished by Robert H. McDonald, with theassistance of Chris Martiniak and William Goodman, formerly Research Assistants to the Chief Counsel for theSpecial Masters on Reapportionment. In spite of their best efforts they could not identify the source and/or intendedpurpose of some items. These are included in Section 4, Miscellaneous, and described as specifically as availableinformation permits.

Dorothy Simpson


Martin 1. Coughlin, PresidingHarold F. CollinsAlvin E. Weinberger

Paul L. McKaskle, Chief Counsel

Chronology of Legislative Attempts at Reapportioning

This includes only those bills, resolutions or Constitutional amendments which passed at least one house. Documentsare listed in order of date of first reading.

1970 (Regular session)

January 7 AB 105, An act ... relating to reapportionment [requires county clerks to provideinformation for the use of the Legislature or legislative committees for use inreapporti onment]

January 7, read first time.March 10, passed and sent to Senate.June 19, passed and sent to Assembly.July 3, signed by Governor.


January 4

January 4

SB 17, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Congressional districts]January 4, read first time.November 29, passed and sent to Assembly.January 3, 1972, from Assembly without further action.

SB 18, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senate and Assemblydistricts]

January 4, read first time.November 11, passed and sent to Assembly.November 23, passed.November 24, sent to Senate.December 2, died on file.

December 4 Regular session adjourns without passing valid legislation as required by[Legislative day Dec. 2] Constitution. Reapportionment Commission activated. (See Masters'

Chronology).

1971 (First Extra session)

December 7 AB 12, An act ... relating to reapportionment, and calling for an election, to takeeffect immediately [reapportions Assembly districts and provides Presidentialand direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.

Special Masters on ReapportionmentMartin J. Coughlin, PresidingHarold F. CollinsAlvin E. Weinberger

Paul L. McKaskle, Chief Counsel

Chronology of Legislative Attempts at ReapportioningThis includes only those bills, resolutions or Constitutional amendments which passed at least one house. Documentsare listed in order of date of first reading.


January 7 AB 105, An act ... relating to reapportionment [requires county clerks to provideinformation for the use of the Legislature or legislative committees for use inreapportionment]

January 7, read first time.March 10, passed and sent to Senate.June 19, passed and sent to Assembly.July 3, signed by Governor.


January 4 SB 17, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Congressional districts]January 4, read first time.November 29, passed and sent to Assembly.January 3, 1972, from Assembly without further action.

January 4 SB 18, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senate and Assemblydistricts]

January 4, read first time.November 11, passed and sent to Assembly.November 23, passed.November 24, sent to Senate.December 2, died on file.

December 4[Legislative day Dec. 2]

Regular session adjourns without passing valid legislation as required byConstitution. Reapportionment Commission activated. (See Masters'Chronology).

1971 (First Extra session)

December 7 AB 12, An act ... relating to reapportionment, and calling for an election, to takeeffect immediately [reapportions Assembly districts and provides Presidentialand direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.

December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.

December 7 AB 16, An act ... relating to reapportionment and calling an election, to take effectimmediately [reapportions Congressional districts]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, amendments concurred in.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.

December 7 ACR 1, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 22, recorded by Secretary of State.

December 7 ACR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions legislative districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, stricken from Senate file.

December 7 SB 2, An act relating to Senatorial reapportionment and calling an election to takeeffect immediately [reapportions state Senate districts, provides thatPresidential and direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Assembly.December 20, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, Senate concurs in Assembly amendment.December 30, vetoed by Governor.March 1, 1972, died on file (veto stands).

December 7 SB 5, An act ... relating to Congressional reapportionment, and calling an election,to take effect immediately [reapportions Congressional districts]

December 7, read first time.December 17, passed and to Assembly.March 1, 1972, from Assembly without further action.

December 19 SCR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]December 19, read first time, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 20, adopted and sent to Senate.December 22, filed with Secretary of State.


January 11 SB 23, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]January 11, read first time.May 2, passed and sent to Assembly.

December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.

December 7 AB 16, An act ... relating to reapportionment and calling an election, to take effectimmediately [reapportions Congressional districts]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, passed and sent to Assembly.December 30, amendments concurred in.December 30, vetoed by Governor.January 4, 1972, veto sustained.

December 7 ACR 1, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 22, recorded by Secretary of State.

December 7 ACR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions legislative districts]December 7, read first time.December 18, adopted and sent to Senate.December 20, stricken from Senate file.

December 7 SB 2, An act relating to Senatorial reapportionment and calling an election to takeeffect immediately [reapportions state Senate districts, provides thatPresidential and direct primary elections shall be held on June 13, 1972]

December 7, read first time.December 18, passed and sent to Assembly.December 20, passed and sent to Senate.December 20, Senate concurs in Assembly amendment.December 30, vetoed by Governor.March 1, 1972, died on file (veto stands).

December 7 SB 5, An act ... relating to Congressional reapportionment, and calling an election,to take effect immediately [reapportions Congressional districts]

December 7, read first time.December 17, passed and to Assembly.March 1, 1972, from Assembly without further action.

December 19 SCR 2, Relative to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]December 19, read first time, adopted and sent to Assembly.December 20, adopted and sent to Senate.December 22, filed with Secretary of State.


January 11 SB 23, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Senatorial districts]January 11, read first time.May 2, passed and sent to Assembly.

December 1, from Assembly without further action.


January 25

February 7

AB 164, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]

January 25, read first time.May 17, passed and sent to Senate.June 5, passed and sent to Assembly.September 10, to inactive file.

SB 195, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]

February 7, read first time.May 23, passed and sent to Assembly.June 14, passed and sent to Senate, Senate concurs in Assemblyamendment.June 27, vetoed by Governor.January 21, 1974, died on active file pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5

Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading toReapportionment

December 4, 1971 [Legislative date December 2] - Legislature adjourned without passing areapportionment plan as required by the Constitution. ReapportionmentCommission empowered to act pursuant to Article IV, Section 6 of the CaliforniaConstitution.

December 15, 1971 Reapportionment Commission convened. Legislature v. Reinecke (Sac.7917) filedwith Supreme Court.

December 27, 1971 Brown v. Reagan (Sac.7919) filed with Supreme Court.

January 6, 1972

January 18, 1972

May 10, 1972

March 23, 1973

Members of the U.S. House of Representatives v. Reagan (Sac.7923) filed withSupreme Court.

The Supreme Court held that the Reapportionment Commission had nojurisdiction, and that the Governor's vetoes stand. Unless the Legislature enactedvalid reapportionment statutes in time for the 1972 elections, the present statutesapportioning the Legislature would remain in effect; Congressional districts wouldbe those set forth in AB 16, 1971 First Extraordinary Session. The Court retainedjurisdiction to draft new reapportionment plans if the Legislature failed to enactvalid legislation by the close of its 1972 regular session. (Consolidated cases,Sac.7917, 7919, 7923).

The Court modified its order of January 18 to permit the Legislature to act eitherin a regular or special session as long as it did so by the end of 1972.

A Special Order of the Court outlined the procedure it would follow indeveloping new district lines. Three Special Masters were to be appointed to hold

December 1, from Assembly without further action.


January 25 AB 164, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]

January 25, read first time.May 17, passed and sent to Senate.June 5, passed and sent to Assembly.September 10, to inactive file.

February 7 SB 195, An act ... relating to reapportionment [reapportions Assembly, Senatorial andCongressional districts]

February 7, read first time.May 23, passed and sent to Assembly.June 14, passed and sent to Senate, Senate concurs in Assemblyamendment.June 27, vetoed by Governor.January 21, 1974, died on active file pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5

Chronology of Judicial Procedures Leading toReapportionment

December 4, 1971 [Legislative date December 2] - Legislature adjourned without passing areapportionment plan as required by the Constitution. ReapportionmentCommission empowered to act pursuant to Article IV, Section 6 of the CaliforniaConstitution.

December 15, 1971 Reapportionment Commission convened. Legislature v. Reinecke (Sac.7917) filedwith Supreme Court.

December 27, 1971 Brown v. Reagan (Sac.7919) filed with Supreme Court.

January 6, 1972 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives v. Reagan (Sac.7923) filed withSupreme Court.

January 18, 1972 The Supreme Court held that the Reapportionment Commission had nojurisdiction, and that the Governor's vetoes stand. Unless the Legislature enactedvalid reapportionment statutes in time for the 1972 elections, the present statutesapportioning the Legislature would remain in effect; Congressional districts wouldbe those set forth in AB 16, 1971 First Extraordinary Session. The Court retainedjurisdiction to draft new reapportionment plans if the Legislature failed to enactvalid legislation by the close of its 1972 regular session. (Consolidated cases,Sac.7917, 7919, 7923).

May 10, 1972 The Court modified its order of January 18 to permit the Legislature to act eitherin a regular or special session as long as it did so by the end of 1972.

March 23, 1973 A Special Order of the Court outlined the procedure it would follow indeveloping new district lines. Three Special Masters were to be appointed to hold

May 1, 1973

August 31, 1973

hearings and submit recommendations by August 31, the Court to begin hearingoral arguments after thirty days (to allow time to submit briefs). The Court wouldconsider halting its proceedings should the Legislature adopt valid plans beforethe Court completed its work.

The Special Masters were appointed and the Presiding Master designated.

The Special Masters presented their report and recommendations.

November 28, 1973 The Court announced its decision to implement the recommendations of theSpecial Masters, with minor changes only.

hearings and submit recommendations by August 31, the Court to begin hearingoral arguments after thirty days (to allow time to submit briefs). The Court wouldconsider halting its proceedings should the Legislature adopt valid plans beforethe Court completed its work.

May 1, 1973 The Special Masters were appointed and the Presiding Master designated.

August 31, 1973 The Special Masters presented their report and recommendations.

November 28, 1973 The Court announced its decision to implement the recommendations of theSpecial Masters, with minor changes only.

> Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of OfficialRecords

This section consists of a list of the items on the Register, with related documents, arranged by number assigned on theRegister, with full titles as shown on the documents. For a reproduction of the "Register of Official Records andWritten Presentations" as prepared by the Masters' staff, see Attachment 1.

[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands styIe sheets.]

Special Masters May 25, 1973

Description of Document

Register No. 1Notice of Hearings Before the Special Masters on Reapportionment and Rules ofHearings, n.d.Proof of Service [by mail], May 25, 1973[Proof of Service by mail], June 29, 1973

Presentor

Teela BacaWinifred L.Hepperle

Date Filed

May 25, 1973July 2, 1973

Register No.2Summary of Written Presentation Filed as a Prerequisite to an Oral Presentation ...Peace and Freedom Party, Sonoma County Central Committee, June 12, 1973

Register No.3Summary of Oral Presentation of Charles E. Bott, Mayor of the City of Stockton,June 8, 1973

Register No.4Gordon Knapp Plan

Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume I) Part One: Criteria ofReapportionment

Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume II) Part Two: Critique ofTemporary Congressional Districts; Part Three: Proposed Congressional DistrictPlan (Knapp Plan)

Exhibit A: Maps of Knapp Plan of Congressional Districts [with markings]

State of California (U.S. Geological Survey)

1970 Census Tracts, City of San Diego and Vicinity

1970 Census Tracts, [Greater Los Angeles Area]

Irvin E. Sutley, June 8, 1973Jr.

Paul F. Mordy, June 11, 1973Assistant CityAttorney

Robert W. June 25, 1973Naylor

1970 Census Tracts, San Francisco BayExhibit B: Listings of Census Units and Populations [computer printout]

Envelope of Material Sent to All County and Local Government Officials re KnappPlan

Robert W.Naylor

June 25, 1973

June 26, 1973

> Section 1. Documents Listed in Register of OfficialRecordsThis section consists of a list of the items on the Register, with related documents, arranged by number assigned on theRegister, with full titles as shown on the documents. For a reproduction of the "Register of Official Records andWritten Presentations" as prepared by the Masters' staff, see Attachment 1.

[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]

Description of Document Presentor Date Filed

Register No. 1Notice of Hearings Before the Special Masters on Reapportionment and Rules ofHearings, n.d.

Special Masters May 25, 1973

Proof of Service [by mail], May 25, 1973 Teela Baca May 25, 1973[Proof of Service by mail], June 29, 1973 Winifred L.

HepperleJuly 2, 1973

Register No. 2Summary of Written Presentation Filed as a Prerequisite to an Oral Presentation ...Peace and Freedom Party, Sonoma County Central Committee, June 12, 1973

Irvin E. Sutley,Jr.

June 8, 1973

Register No. 3Summary of Oral Presentation of Charles E. Bott, Mayor of the City of Stockton,June 8, 1973

Paul F. Mordy,Assistant CityAttorney

June 11, 1973

Register No. 4Gordon Knapp Plan

Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume I) Part One: Criteria ofReapportionment

Written Presentation of Gordon Knapp (Volume II) Part Two: Critique ofTemporary Congressional Districts; Part Three: Proposed Congressional DistrictPlan (Knapp Plan)

Exhibit A: Maps of Knapp Plan of Congressional Districts [with markings]

State of California (U.S. Geological Survey)

1970 Census Tracts, City of San Diego and Vicinity

1970 Census Tracts, [Greater Los Angeles Area]

1970 Census Tracts, San Francisco Bay

Robert W.Naylor

June 25, 1973

Exhibit B: Listings of Census Units and Populations [computer printout] Robert W.Naylor

June 25, 1973

Envelope of Material Sent to All County and Local Government Officials re KnappPlan

June 26, 1973

http://www.netscape.com/http://www.microsoft.com/ie/

Examples of Redistricting Using Only Good Government Criteria [maps]

San Francisco Bay Area - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary Session [maps]

Los Angeles and Vicinity - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary session [maps]

[California] Knapp Reapportionment Plan

Congressional Districts, June 1973 and Congressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971, FirstExtraordinary Session [maps]

Memorandum to Special Masters, June 27, 1973

Factual Data Sheet

Letter to All County and Local Government Officials

Press Release

Resolution

Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp

Second Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp

Robert W.NaylorRobert W.Naylor

June 10, 1973

July 31, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, June 25, 1973Memorandum to Special Masters re "the question of seniority with regards to the congressionaldelegation" , June 29, 1973Letter to PaulL. McKaskle re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, July 17, 1973Memo to Justice Coughlin re Naylor and Knapp, July 19, 1973

KNAPPCON District 01----50, 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout markedKnapp"]

Robert W. Naylor June 25, 1973Gordon Knapp June 29 1973

Robert W. Naylor July 19, [1973]Paul E. McKaskle n.d.

Register No.5Statement of Linda G. Bond for the University of California Student Lobby, June 12, Linda G. Bond, June 12, 19731973 Co-Director

Exhibit No.1: Congressional District 36 (1972) [map]


Exhibit No.3: Central Area Metropolitan Los Angeles [street map]

Register No.6Position Statement on Reapportionment, February 1971

Register No. 7Written Presentation of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the Stateof California; County of Stanislaus, a Political Subdivision of the State ofCalifornia; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City of Lodi, a MunicipalCorporation, City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; City of Manteca, a Municipal

County ClerksAssociation ofCalifornia

[VariousCounty andCity Counsels]

June 12, 1973

June 12, 1973

Examples of Redistricting Using Only Good Government Criteria [maps]

San Francisco Bay Area - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary Session [maps]

Los Angeles and Vicinity - Knapp Reapportionment Plan, Congressional Districts, June 1973 andCongressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971 First Extraordinary session [maps]

[California] Knapp Reapportionment Plan

Congressional Districts, June 1973 and Congressional Districts, Assembly Bill no.l6, 1971, FirstExtraordinary Session [maps]

Memorandum to Special Masters, June 27, 1973

Factual Data Sheet

Letter to All County and Local Government Officials

Press Release

ResolutionSupplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp Robert W.

NaylorJune 10, 1973

Second Supplemental Presentation of Gordon Knapp Robert W.Naylor

July 31, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, June 25, 1973 Robert W. Naylor June 25, 1973Memorandum to Special Masters re "the question of seniority with regards to the congressionaldelegation", June 29, 1973

Gordon Knapp June 29 1973

Letter to Paul L. McKaskle re Gordon Knapp--Proposed Congressional Districting, July 17, 1973 Robert W. Naylor July 19, [1973]Memo to Justice Coughlin re Naylor and Knapp, July 19, 1973

KNAPPCON District 01----50, 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout markedKnapp"]

Paul E. McKaskle n.d.

Register No. 5Statement of Linda G. Bond for the University of California Student Lobby, June 12,1973



Exhibit No.3: Central Area Metropolitan Los Angeles [street map]

Linda G. Bond,Co-Director

June 12, 1973

Register No. 6Position Statement on Reapportionment, February 1971 County Clerks

Association ofCalifornia

June 12, 1973

Register No. 7Written Presentation of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the Stateof California; County of Stanislaus, a Political Subdivision of the State ofCalifornia; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City of Lodi, a MunicipalCorporation, City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; City of Manteca, a Municipal


June 12, 1973

Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; and Escalon, a MunicipalCorporation [with 10 maps], June 11, 1973Specific Plan of Reapportionment Proposed by the County of San Joaquin, a [Various July 10, 1973Political Subdivision of the State of California.; County of Stanislaus, a Political County andSubdivision of the State of California; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation; City Counsels]City of Lodi, a Municipal Corporation; City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; Cityof Manteca, a Municipal Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; andEscalon, a Municipal Corporation

Exhibit A: [map], July 10, 1973

Register No.8Outline of Lieutenant Governor Ed Reinecke's Testimony Scheduled Los Angeles,June 10, 1973 (SAC. 7917), June 13, 1973

Register No.9Resolution [no. 1973-79] of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos OpposingProposed Assembly Redistricting of Santa Clara County, June 4, 1973

Register No. 10Evidence and Statement by T. Jim Gibson; The Wall Street Political Association,June 18, 1973

Ronald B. June 14, 1973Frankum

Mark B. June 15, 1973DiDuca, Mayor

Loren Miller, June 18, 1973Jr., and Dion G.Morrow

Register No. 11Halliwell PlanHalliwell Testimony Before Special Masters on Reapportionment

[Maps marked as follows]

1 Statewide Assembly

2 San Francisco Bay Assembly

3 Los Angeles County Assembly

4 Southern California Assembly

5 Statewide Senate

6 San Francisco Bay Senate

7 Los Angeles County Senate

8 Southern California Senate

9 Statewide Congress

10 San Francisco Bay Congress

11 Los Angeles County Congress

12 Southern California Congress

Revised Halliwell Plan [with maps numbered I----IX

Michael J.Halliwell

Michael J.Halliwell

June 18, 1973

August 1, 1973

Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; and Escalon, a MunicipalCorporation [with 10 maps], June 11, 1973Specific Plan of Reapportionment Proposed by the County of San Joaquin, aPolitical Subdivision of the State of California.; County of Stanislaus, a PoliticalSubdivision of the State of California; City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation;City of Lodi, a Municipal Corporation; City of Tracy, a Municipal Corporation; Cityof Manteca, a Municipal Corporation; City of Ripon, a Municipal Corporation; andEscalon, a Municipal Corporation

Exhibit A: [map], July 10, 1973


July 10, 1973

Register No. 8Outline of Lieutenant Governor Ed Reinecke's Testimony Scheduled Los Angeles,June l0, 1973 (SAC. 7917), June 13, 1973

Ronald B.Frankum

June 14, 1973

Register No. 9Resolution [no. 1973-79] of the Town Council of the Town of Los Gatos OpposingProposed Assembly Redistricting of Santa Clara County, June 4, 1973

Mark B.DiDuca, Mayor

June 15, 1973

Register No. 10Evidence and Statement by T. Jim Gibson; The Wall Street Political Association,June 18, 1973

Loren Miller,Jr., and Dion G.Morrow

June 18, 1973

Register No. 11Halliwell PlanHalliwell Testimony Before Special Masters on Reapportionment

[Maps marked as follows]

1 Statewide Assembly

2 San Francisco Bay Assembly

3 Los Angeles County Assembly

4 Southern California Assembly

5 Statewide Senate

6 San Francisco Bay Senate

7 Los Angeles County Senate

8 Southern California Senate

9 Statewide Congress

10 San Francisco Bay Congress

11 Los Angeles County Congress

12 Southern California Congress

Michael J.Halliwell

June 18, 1973

Revised Halliwell Plan [with maps numbered I----IX Michael J.Halliwell

August 1, 1973

[Group of 12 maps labeled "Revised Halliwell Plan" with markings, rolled]

California, County Subdivisions--Census County Divisions and Places

Assembly Districts [collaged]

Senatorial Districts [collaged]

Congressional Districts [collaged]

Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity

Assembly Districts



Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Assembly Districts



Related Documents

[photocopy set of the group of maps listed immediately above, unlabeled, with markings and rolled]

Explanatory Note

Plan for Nonpartisan Reapportionment [part of which corresponds to the Revised Halliwell Plan]

[Group of 4 maps]

See also Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases, October 1, 1973

Michael J.Halliwell

August 1, 1973

Register No. 12Letter from Claremont City Council [with enclosure], June 15, 1973

Register No. 13Statement from Los Angeles County Coordinating Council, National Women'sPolitical Caucus re Reapportionment: the Effect of Certain Proposed Criteria forReapportionment on the Political Power of Women As an Identifiable Group ofPersons in California, June 18, 1973

Register No. 14

Keith F. June 18, 1973Mulrooney,City Manager

Nina R. June 18, 1973Chomsky,Chairperson protern

[Group of 12 maps labeled "Revised Halliwell Plan" with markings, rolled]

California, County Subdivisions--Census County Divisions and Places

Assembly Districts [collaged]

Senatorial Districts [collaged]

Congressional Districts [collaged]

Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County

Assembly Districts



Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity

Assembly Districts



Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Assembly Districts



Related Documents

[Photocopy set of the group of maps listed immediately above, unlabeled, with markings and rolled]

Explanatory Note

Plan for Nonpartisan Reapportionment [part of which corresponds to the Revised Halliwell Plan]

[Group of 4 maps]

See also Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases, October 1, 1973

Michael J.Halliwell

August 1, 1973

Register No. 12Letter from Claremont City Council [with enclosure], June 15, 1973 Keith F.

Mulrooney,City Manager

June 18, 1973

Register No. 13Statement from Los Angeles County Coordinating Council, National Women'sPolitical Caucus re Reapportionment: the Effect of Certain Proposed Criteria forReapportionment on the Political Power of Women As an Identifiable Group ofPersons in California, June 18, 1973

Nina R.Chomsky,Chairperson protem

June 18, 1973

Register No. 14

Resolution on Reapportionment by Los Angeles County Democratic CentralCommittee (n.d.) [with attachment] CDC Issues Program 1967 ... Presentation ofDiscussion Material by the Issues Development Committee on CaliforniaConstitutional Reform ...

Les River, Los June 18, 1973AngelesChairman

Register No. 15Resolution No. 4344 (City Council Series) a Resolution of the City of Santa Monica City Council of June 18, 1973Opposing Assembly Bill 8, March 13, 1973 Santa Monica

Register No. 16Clerk's Minutes, Sacramento Hearing, June 12, 1973 [schedule of testimony only]for reporter's transcript see nO.89.

WilliamGoodman

June 20, 1973

Register No. 17Presentation for 35th District of Orange County, June 15, 1973

Register No. 18Resolution of Orange County, June 13, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter from Orange County Division, League of California Cities, June 18, 1973

Register No. 19Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Petitioners, Angelita Garcia et aI., reCriteria for Reapportionment, June 20, 1973

Petitioners Garcia et ai. Request for Fair Reapportionment, July 10, 1973

[Attachment No.l: Envelope with 3 maps]

[Attachment NO.2: Envelope with 2 maps]

Declaration of Nancy R. Myers, August 2, 1973

[4 unidentified printouts]

[Maps numbered] Garcia Plan No. 1----3 [different from attachment NO.1 above]Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters [with 3 maps], June 26, 1973

DEMOG 12: 19 PDT 06/09/73 [computer printout]

Chicano Community ... in Los Angeles County ...

227 Census Tracts, June 29, 1973

Register No. 20Senate Resolution No. 51 Relative to the Senate Reapportionment Plan, June 19,1973

John V. Briggs, June 20, 1973Assemblyman

Board of June 20, 1973Supervisors

Winston R. June 18, 1973Updegraff,Executive Secretary

Peter H. June 21, 1973Weiner, et al.[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]Stanley Wm. July 11, 1973Levy[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance][California August 8, 1973Rural LegalAssistance]

Stanley Wm. Levy, June 26,1973Beverly Hills BarAssociation LawFoundation

Senators June 20, 1973Harmer, et ai.

Resolution on Reapportionment by Los Angeles County Democratic CentralCommittee (n.d.) [with attachment] CDC Issues Program 1967 ... Presentation ofDiscussion Material by the Issues Development Committee on CaliforniaConstitutional Reform ...

Les River, LosAngelesChairman

June 18, 1973

Register No. 15Resolution No. 4344 (City Council Series) a Resolution of the City of Santa MonicaOpposing Assembly Bill 8, March 13, 1973

City Council ofSanta Monica

June 18, 1973

Register No. 16Clerk's Minutes, Sacramento Hearing, June 12, 1973 [schedule of testimony only]for reporter's transcript see no.89.

WilliamGoodman

June 20, 1973

Register No. 17Presentation for 35th District of Orange County, June 15, 1973 John V. Briggs,

AssemblymanJune 20, 1973

Register No. 18Resolution of Orange County, June 13, 1973 Board of

SupervisorsJune 20, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter from Orange County Division, League of California Cities, June 18, 1973 Winston R.

Updegraff,Executive Secretary

June 18, 1973

Register No. 19Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Petitioners, Angelita Garcia et al., reCriteria for Reapportionment, June 20, 1973

Peter H.Weiner, et al.[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]

June 21, 1973

Petitioners Garcia et al. Request for Fair Reapportionment, July 10, 1973

[Attachment No.l: Envelope with 3 maps]

[Attachment No.2: Envelope with 2 maps]

Stanley Wm.Levy[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]

July 11, 1973

Declaration of Nancy R. Myers, August 2, 1973

[4 unidentified printouts]

[Maps numbered] Garcia Plan No. 1----3 [different from attachment No.1 above]

[CaliforniaRural LegalAssistance]

August 8, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter to Special Masters [with 3 maps], June 26, 1973

DEMOG 12: 19 PDT 06/09/73 [computer printout]

Chicano Community ... in Los Angeles County ...

227 Census Tracts, June 29, 1973

Stanley Wm. Levy,Beverly Hills BarAssociation LawFoundation

June 26, 1973

Register No. 20Senate Resolution No. 51 Relative to the Senate Reapportionment Plan, June 19,1973

SenatorsHarmer, et al.

June 20, 1973

Register No. 21Senate PlanDesignation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Senate

Brief of the Senate of the State of California Recommending Adoption of anApproved Bipartisan Reapportionment Plan for the Senate

Exhibit A: Senate Bill 195 and Its Legislative History, 6 vol.

Exhibit B-1: Maps Showing New Districts Provided by the Senate Exhibit B- 2: Maps Showing SenateDistricts As They Now Exist Before Reapportionment [39 maps]

Robert S.DaggettRobert S.Daggett

June 21, 1973

June 21, 1973

Register No. 22Office of Senator John Stull, Weekly Column for the Week of May 27, ThroughJune 2, 1973 [filed at San Diego Hearing]

Register No. 23Testimony of Assemblyman Bill Bond, San Diego, June 22, 1973

Register No. 24Objection to Proposed Assembly District Line in Humboldt County [with coverletter], June 21, 1973

Gehres and June 22, 1973Si1las

Assemblyman June 22, 1973Bond

Fred 1. Moore, June 22, 1973Jr., CountyClerk

Register No. 25Presentation of Contra Costa County Democratic Central Committee, June 23, 1973

Register No. 26Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee (13th Districts, June 22, 1973

Register No. 27Application for Written and Oral Presentation and Oral Argument, June 22, 1973

Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, December 8, 1972, (SAC7917)

Complaint for Right to Vote and Equal Representation and Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, December 8, 1972, (SAC 7917)

Related DocumentsPetition for Writ of Mandamus, Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, January 14, 1972

Register No. 28

Minot W.Tripp,Admini strativeSecretary

AssemblymanBee

Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.RippenEugene Rippenand Wayne F.RippenEugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen

Eugene Rippen andWayne F. Rippen

June 25, 1973

June 25, 1973

June 25, 1973

June 25, 1973

Register No. 21Senate PlanDesignation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Senate Robert S.

DaggettJune 21, 1973

Brief of the Senate of the State of California Recommending Adoption of anApproved Bipartisan Reapportionment Plan for the Senate

Exhibit A: Senate Bill 195 and Its Legislative History, 6 vol.

Exhibit B-1: Maps Showing New Districts Provided by the Senate Exhibit B-2: Maps Showing SenateDistricts As They Now Exist Before Reapportionment [39 maps]

Robert S.Daggett

June 21, 1973

Register No. 22Office of Senator John Stull, Weekly Column for the Week of May 27, ThroughJune 2, 1973 [filed at San Diego Hearing]

Gehres andSillas

June 22, 1973

Register No. 23Testimony of Assemblyman Bill Bond, San Diego, June 22, 1973 Assemblyman

BondJune 22, 1973

Register No. 24Objection to Proposed Assembly District Line in Humboldt County [with coverletter], June 21, 1973

Fred J. Moore,Jr., CountyClerk

June 22, 1973

Register No. 25Presentation of Contra Costa County Democratic Central Committee, June 23, 1973 Minot W.

Tripp,AdministrativeSecretary

June 25, 1973

Register No. 26Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee (13th Districts, June 22, 1973 Assemblyman

BeeJune 25, 1973

Register No. 27Application for Written and Oral Presentation and Oral Argument, June 22, 1973 Eugene Rippen

and Wayne F.Rippen

June 25, 1973

Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, December 8, 1972, (SAC7917)

Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen

June 25, 1973

Complaint for Right to Vote and Equal Representation and Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, December 8, 1972, (SAC 7917)

Eugene Rippenand Wayne F.Rippen

Related DocumentsPetition for Writ of Mandamus, Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, January 14, 1972

Eugene Rippen andWayne F. Rippen

Register No. 28

Summary of Proposed Oral Presentation, June 25, 1973

Written Presentation of the Republican State Central Committee of California, July10, 1973

PutnamLivermorePutnamLivermore

June 25, 1973

July 12, 1973

Register No. 29Testimony of Republican County Central Committee of San Francisco

Register No. 30Brief of Petitioners, Members of the United States House of Representatives(Volume I of III), June 22, 1973

Analysis of Petitioners Plan (Volume II of III), June 21,1973

Maps (Volume III of III)

Supplemental Presentation of Petitioners, Members of the United States House ofRepresentatives, July 22, 1973

Appendix (vol. I of II) [detailed analysis of the adjustments to the petitioners request]

Appendix (vol. II of II) [maps]

Related DocumentsLetter to Paul McKaskle [enclosures, copies of court decisions], June 19, 1973

Register No. 31A Proposal for the Computerized Drawing of Legislative and CongressionalBoundaries, n.d.

J. Max Moore, June 25, 1973Chairman

Wyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 25, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, June 23, 1973Bautzer,Rothman andKuchelWyman, Bautzer, August 3, 1973Rothman andKuchelWyman, Bautzer, August 3, 1973Rothman andKuchel

Wyman, Bautzer, June 22, 1973Rothman andKuchel

Joseph McCord June 26, 1973

Register No. 32Resolution Pertaining to State Redistricting Plan, Resolution No. 73-379, County ofSanta Barbara, June 11, 1973

Register No. 33Written Presentation of Governor Ronald Reagan

Brief on Behalf of Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, July 10,1973

Board ofSupervisors

GovernorReaganEvelle J.Younger,AttorneyGeneral

June 26, 1973

June 27, 1973

July 11, 1973

Summary of Proposed Oral Presentation, June 25, 1973 PutnamLivermore

June 25, 1973

Written Presentation of the Republican State Central Committee of California, Julyl0, 1973

PutnamLivermore

July 12, 1973

Register No. 29Testimony of Republican County Central Committee of San Francisco J. Max Moore,

ChairmanJune 25, 1973

Register No. 30Brief of Petitioners, Members of the United States House of Representatives(Volume I of III), June 22, 1973

Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

June 25, 1973

Analysis of Petitioners Plan (Volume II of III), June 21, 1973 Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

June 25, 1973

Maps (Volume III of III) Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

June 25, 1973

Supplemental Presentation of Petitioners, Members of the United States House ofRepresentatives, July 22, 1973

Wyman,Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

June 23, 1973

Appendix (vol. I of II) [detailed analysis of the adjustments to the petitioners request] Wyman, Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

August 3, 1973

Appendix (vol. II of II) [maps] Wyman, Bautzer,Rothman andKuchel

August 3, 1973

Related DocumentsLetter to Paul McKaskle [enclosures, copies of court decisions], June l9, 1973 Wyman, Bautzer,

Rothman andKuchel

June 22, 1973

Register No. 31A Proposal for the Computerized Drawing of Legislative and CongressionalBoundaries, n.d.

Joseph McCord June 26, 1973

Register No. 32Resolution Pertaining to State Redistricting Plan, Resolution No. 73-379, County ofSanta Barbara, June 11, 1973

Board ofSupervisors

June 26, 1973

Register No. 33Written Presentation of Governor Ronald Reagan Governor

ReaganJune 27, 1973

Brief on Behalf of Ronald Reagan, Governor of the State of California, July 10,1973

Evelle J.Younger,AttorneyGeneral

July 11, 1973

Register No. 34Hearing, San Francisco, June 6, 1973 [transcript of prehearing conference]

Register No. 35Presentation by the City of Pacifica, n.d.

RhondaJackson,Reporter

Aubrey M.Lumley, III,Mayor

June 23, 1973

June 28, 1973

Register No. 36Testimony of Mayor of Whittier, June 28, 1973

Register No. 37Statement of Daly City

Register No. 38Presentation by Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County [1 map withoriginal copy only], June 28, 1973

Register No. 39Statement for Marin County, June 28, 1973

Register No. 40State Election Districts [map]

Related DocumentsSenate Journal, June 19, 1973, pp. 3564-3565 [Xerox copy]

[Copy of map showing towns of Baldwin Park, Covina, West Covina, etc.]

Blake P. June 28, 1973Sanborn, Mayor

Victor G. June 28, 1973Kyriakis, ViceMayor

Ruben S. Ayala, June 28, 1973Supervisor,Fourth Di st.

Peter R. June 28, 1973Arrigoni,Supervisor

Dr. Nancy June 29, 1973Jewell Cross,People'sAdvocate

Jon D. Smock,Assistant Director,Judicial Council ofCalifornia,AdministrativeOffice of the Courts

Register No. 41Designation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Legislature of theState of California, and Especially the Assembly Thereof, June 26, 1973

[Complete SB 195 Assembly Plan]SB 195 AmendmentsAssembly Districts As Proposed in SB 195 [statistical list]

George H.Murphy andHerman F.Selvin

June 28, 1973

June 28, 1973July 5, 1973

Register No. 34Hearing, San Francisco, June 6, 1973 [transcript of prehearing conference] Rhonda

Jackson,Reporter

June 23, 1973

Register No. 35Presentation by the City of Pacifica, n.d. Aubrey M.

Lumley, III,Mayor

June 28, 1973

Register No. 36Testimony of Mayor of Whittier, June 28, 1973 Blake P.

Sanborn, MayorJune 28, 1973

Register No. 37Statement of Daly City Victor G.

Kyriakis, ViceMayor

June 28, 1973

Register No. 38Presentation by Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County [1 map withoriginal copy only], June 28, 1973

Ruben S. Ayala,Supervisor,Fourth Dist.

June 28, 1973

Register No. 39Statement for Marin County, June 28, 1973 Peter R.

Arrigoni,Supervisor

June 28, 1973

Register No. 40State Election Districts [map] Dr. Nancy

Jewell Cross,People'sAdvocate

June 29, 1973

Related DocumentsSenate Journal, June l9, 1973, pp. 3564-3565 [Xerox copy] Jon D. Smock,

Assistant Director,Judicial Council ofCalifornia,AdministrativeOffice of the Courts

[Copy of map showing towns of Baldwin Park, Covina, West Covina, etc.]

Register No. 41Designation of Witnesses to Appear at Hearing on Behalf of the Legislature of theState of California, and Especially the Assembly Thereof, June 26, 1973

George H.Murphy andHerman F.Selvin

June 28, 1973

[Complete SB 195 Assembly Plan]SB 195 Amendments June 28, 1973Assembly Districts As Proposed in SB 195 [statistical list] July 5, 1973

Current Assembly Districts [statistical list][Current Assembly Districts [maps]AB 164 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout][30 unnumbered maps]Letter" citing authorities in support of the bill adopted by a bipartisan maj ority of both houses of theLegislature," July 11, 1973

Register No. 42Statement of Assemblyman John Francis Foran, June 29, 1973

Register No. 43Declaration of Richard Alatorre, June 18, 1973

Declaration of Mervyn M. Dymally, June 18, 1973

Declaration of Nicholas C. Petris, June 20, 1973

Declaration of George R. Moscone, June 26, 1973

Declaration of Armando O. Rodriguez, June 26, 1973

Register No. 44Presentation by Board of Directors, Pomona Chamber of Commerce reReapportionment Criteria, June 29, 1973

Register No. 45The problem Facing California, Together with the Solution, June 29, 1973

Register No. 46Statements for the City of Pomona, June 29, 1973

Register No. 47Statement of the City of Redwood City and Supporting Declaration of Paul C.Keckley, Mayor of the City of Redwood City, June 28, 1973

Herman F. Selvin

AssemblymanForan

[Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups][Mexican-AmericanGroups]

G. GrenvilleWhyte,President

Robert K.Ballard,Attorney

Ray 1. Lepire,Mayor

David E.Schricker, CityAttorney

July 5, 1973July 5, 1973

July 13, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

June 29, 1973

Related DocumentsSummary of Oral Presentation, June 28, 1973

Register No. 48

David E. Schricker, June 29, 1973City Attorney

Current Assembly Districts [statistical list] July 5, 1973[Current Assembly Districts [maps] July 5, 1973AB 164 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election [computer printout][30 unnumbered maps]Letter "citing authorities in support of the bill adopted by a bipartisan majority of both houses of theLegislature," July 11, 1973

Herman F. Selvin July 13, 1973

Register No. 42Statement of Assemblyman John Francis Foran, June 29, 1973 Assemblyman

ForanJune 29, 1973

Register No. 43Declaration of Richard Alatorre, June l8, 1973 [Mexican-

AmericanGroups]

June 29, 1973

Declaration of Mervyn M. Dymally, June 18, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]

June 29, 1973

Declaration of Nicholas C. Petris, June 20, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]

June 29, 1973

Declaration of George R. Moscone, June 26, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]

June 29, 1973

Declaration of Armando O. Rodriguez, June 26, 1973 [Mexican-AmericanGroups]

June 29, 1973

Register No. 44Presentation by Board of Directors, Pomona Chamber of Commerce reReapportionment Criteria, June 29, 1973

G. GrenvilleWhyte,President

June 29, 1973

Register No. 45The problem Facing California, Together with the Solution, June 29, 1973 Robert K.

Ballard,Attorney

June 29, 1973

Register No. 46Statements for the City of Pomona, June 29, 1973 Ray J. Lepire,

MayorJune 29, 1973

Register No. 47Statement of the City of Redwood City and Supporting Declaration of Paul C.Keckley, Mayor of the City of Redwood City, June 28, 1973

David E.Schricker, CityAttorney

June 29, 1973

Related DocumentsSummary of Oral Presentation, June 28, 1973 David E. Schricker,

City AttorneyJune 29, 1973

Register No. 48

Statement of John 1. Berwald, June 29, 1973 John 1. Berwald June 29, 1973

Register No. 49Written Presentation for the City of Fremont

Register No. 50Statement of Senator Arlen Gregorio, 12th Senatorial District, n.d.

Register No. 51Written Presentation of the Monterey County Republican Central Committee, June28, 1973

Register No. 52Brief of the Assembly Minority Leadership [with exhibits attached], July 2, 1973

Register No. 53Brief of Assemblyman John E. Thurman's Recommended Delineation of theThirtieth Assembly District, June 27, 1973

Register No. 54Statement of Roger F. Winchester, June 28, 1973

Register No. 55Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee, July 6, 1973

Register No. 56Presentation of Pertinent Material on the Assembly Reapportionment of SanFrancisco by Mexican American Political Association, July 3, 1973

Jack A.Pimental,Mayor

SenatorGregorio

Louis C.Moore,Attorney

Halley andCornell

AssemblymanThurman

Roger F.Winchester

AssemblymanBee

EduardoSandoval,President

June 29, 1973

July 2, 1973

July 3, 1973

July 3, 1973

July 3, 1973

July 3, 1973

July 6, 1973

July 6, 1973

Register No. 57Brief of Walnut Creek, n.d.

Register No. 58[Unused]

Register No. 59Appeal to Disapprove Gerrymandering in AB 165, Especially as to the SecondSenatorial District, June 30, 1973

Register No. 60Statement of Assemblyman Bill Greene, July 6, 1973

James D. Hill, July 6, 1973Mayor

Velma Smith July 6, 1973

Assemblyman July 6, 1973

Statement of John J. Berwald, June 29, 1973 John J. Berwald June 29, 1973

Register No. 49Written Presentation for the City of Fremont Jack A.

Pimental,Mayor

June 29, 1973

Register No. 50Statement of Senator Arlen Gregorio, 12th Senatorial District, n.d. Senator

GregorioJuly 2, 1973

Register No. 51Written Presentation of the Monterey County Republican Central Committee, June28, 1973

Louis C.Moore,Attorney

July 3, 1973

Register No. 52Brief of the Assembly Minority Leadership [with exhibits attached], July 2, 1973 Halley and

CornellJuly 3, 1973

Register No. 53Brief of Assemblyman John E. Thurman's Recommended Delineation of theThirtieth Assembly District, June 27, 1973

AssemblymanThurman

July 3, 1973

Register No. 54Statement of Roger F. Winchester, June 28, 1973 Roger F.

WinchesterJuly 3, 1973

Register No. 55Statement of Assemblyman Carlos Bee, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman

BeeJuly 6, 1973

Register No. 56Presentation of Pertinent Material on the Assembly Reapportionment of SanFrancisco by Mexican American Political Association, July 3, 1973

EduardoSandoval,President

July 6, 1973

Register No. 57Brief of Walnut Creek, n.d. James D. Hill,

MayorJuly 6, 1973

Register No. 58[Unused]

Register No. 59Appeal to Disapprove Gerrymandering in AB 165, Especially as to the SecondSenatorial District, June 30, 1973

Velma Smith July 6, 1973

Register No. 60Statement of Assemblyman Bill Greene, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman July 6, 1973

Register No. 61Oral Argument of Senator Milton Marks with Points and Authorities in SupportThereof, n.d.

Greene

Senator Marks July 6, 1973

Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973

Register No. 62Testimony by Assemblyman Walter M. Ingalls, July 6, 1973

Register No. 63Letters to Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright, 10th Assembly District reReapportionment, July 5, 1973

Register No. 64Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to FileBrief As Amicus Curiae, and Brief (SAC 7919), January 13, 1973

Register No. 65Summary of Comments, July 6, 1973Related DocumentsLetter to Justice Coughlin re Reapportionment, June 29, 1973

AssemblymanIngalls

[VariousConstituents]

William T.Bagley andArthur V.Azevedo

Ernest LaCoste

July 6, 1973

July 6, 1973

July 6, 1973

July 6, 1973

Register No. 66A Modified Plan for the Division of San Mateo County That Does Not Split AnyCities [2 maps], n.d.

Register No. 67Senator Mervyn M. Dymally PlanStatement by State Senator Mervyn M. Dymally, July 6, 1973

Supplementary Data and Documentation, June 6, 1973A Report on Reapportionment of the State Senate As Proposed in Senate Bill No.63, Dymally. Includes Computer Print-out with Tract Listings and OtherDocumentation, Prepared by the Staff of Elections and Reapportionment, DS BatchJob 01 ENR, n.d.

Register No. 68Claremont Institute PlanLetter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of PoliticalScience, Claremont Men's College, July 10, 1973Reapportionment -- Step 1 [computer printout]

Assembly Reapportionment [maps, folded][Fresno][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area]

Louis Papan, July 6, 1973Assemblyman,27th District

Senator July 6, 1973Dymally

July 6, 1973

Alan Heslop, July 11, 1973Director

Greene

Register No. 61Oral Argument of Senator Milton Marks with Points and Authorities in SupportThereof, n.d.

Senator Marks July 6, 1973

Register No. 62Testimony by Assemblyman Walter M. Ingalls, July 6, 1973 Assemblyman

IngallsJuly 6, 1973

Register No. 63Letters to Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright, 10th Assembly District reReapportionment, July 5, 1973

[VariousConstituents]

July 6, 1973

Register No. 64Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to FileBrief As Amicus Curiae, and Brief (SAC 7919), January 13, 1973

William T.Bagley andArthur V.Azevedo

July 6, 1973

Register No. 65Summary of Comments, July 6, 1973 Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973Related DocumentsLetter to Justice Coughlin re Reapportionment, June 29, 1973 Ernest LaCoste July 6, 1973

Register No. 66A Modified Plan for the Division of San Mateo County That Does Not Split AnyCities [2 maps], n.d.

Louis Papan,Assemblyman,27th District

July 6, 1973

Register No. 67Senator Mervyn M. Dymally PlanStatement by State Senator Mervyn M. Dymally, July 6, 1973 Senator

DymallyJuly 6, 1973

Supplementary Data and Documentation, June 6, 1973 July 6, 1973A Report on Reapportionment of the State Senate As Proposed in Senate Bill No.63, Dymally. Includes Computer Print-out with Tract Listings and OtherDocumentation, Prepared by the Staff of Elections and Reapportionment, DS BatchJob 01 ENR, n.d.

Register No. 68Claremont Institute PlanLetter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of PoliticalScience, Claremont Men's College, July 10, 1973

Alan Heslop,Director

July 11, 1973

Reapportionment -- Step 1 [computer printout]

Assembly Reapportionment [maps, folded] [Fresno][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area]

San Francisco BayStockton

[Maps, rolled][California, Northern Half] [1 copy with markings][California, Southern Half] [1 copy with markings][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area], San Diego Planning DepartmentSan Francisco Bay

[Computer printouts][A] DS Batch Job 01 Supct, AD. Listing, Forward and Reverse[B] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[C] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[D] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[E] [Continuation of D][F] DS Batch Job 01 Supct[G] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[H] [No identification][I] 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election[J] Claremont Institute Republican Assembly

Register No. 69Written Presentation of the City of Fremont, n.d.

Register No. 70Presentation of the Republican Central Committee of Los Angeles County, July 5,1973 [photograph of Santa Monica Bay with original copy only]

Jack A.Pimental,Mayor

AlanMacQuoid,Chairman

July 9, 1973

July 9, 1973

Register No. 71Presentation of Robert F. Barry, July 6,1973 Robert F. Barry July 9, 1973

Register No. 72Statement of Senator John Stull, July 8, 1973 Senator Stull July 10, 1973

Register No. 73Written Statement in Support of the Dymally Bill for the Reapportionment of the2nd State Senatorial District, and the 4th Assembly District by the Glenn CountyCitizens Committee on Reapportionment, n.d.

Register No. 74Testimony of Assemblyman Newton R. Russell, 62nd Assembly District, n.d.

Register No. 75Statement of Representative Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., n.d.

Register No. 76

Rose Manner et July 10, 1973al.

Assemblyman July 10, 1973Russell

Representative July 10, 1973McCloskey

San Francisco BayStockton

[Maps, rolled] [California, Northern Half] [1 copy with markings][California, Southern Half] [1 copy with markings][Greater Los Angeles Area]Sacramento County[San Diego Area], San Diego Planning DepartmentSan Francisco Bay

[Computer printouts] [A] DS Batch Job 01 Supct, A.D. Listing, Forward and Reverse[B] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[C] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[D] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[E] [Continuation of D][F] DS Batch Job 01 Supct[G] DS Batch Job 02 Supct[H] [No identification][I] 1972 ... 1970 ... 1968 General Election[J] Claremont Institute Republican Assembly

Register No. 69Written Presentation of the City of Fremont, n.d. Jack A.

Pimental,Mayor

July 9, 1973

Register No. 70Presentation of the Republican Central Committee of Los Angeles County, July 5,1973 [photograph of Santa Monica Bay with original copy only]

AlanMacQuoid,Chairman

July 9, 1973

Register No. 71Presentation of Robert F. Barry, July 6, 1973 Robert F. Barry July 9, 1973

Register No. 72Statement of Senator John Stull, July 8, 1973 Senator Stull July 10, 1973

Register No. 73Written Statement in Support of the Dymally Bill for the Reapportionment of the2nd State Senatorial District, and the 4th Assembly District by the Glenn CountyCitizens Committee on Reapportionment, n.d.

Rose Manner etal.

July 10, 1973

Register No. 74Testimony of Assemblyman Newton R. Russell, 62nd Assembly District, n.d. Assemblyman

RussellJuly 10, 1973

Register No. 75Statement of Representative Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., n.d. Representative

McCloskeyJuly 10, 1973

Register No. 76

Written Presentation by John W. Stark, July 8, 1973

Register No. 77Resolution No. 73-65 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, July 10,1973

Register No. 78Written Presentation of the City of Roseville, July 9, 1973

Register No. 79Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62 re Reapportionment of the Second SenatorialDistrict, n.d.

Register No. 80Letter from the Sutter County Citizens for Fair Reapportionment, n.d.

Register No. 81Presentation re Reapportionment of the Second Senatorial District, n.d.

Related DocumentsStatement of Lola Cade [with notation" and signers of original copies"], n.d.Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62, n.d.Letter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of Political Science, Claremont Men'sCollege, July 10, 1973 and Summary of Claremont Plan, July 10, 1973

Register No. 82Recorder's Transcript of the Proceedings in San Diego, June 22, 1973, July 13, 1973

Exhibit 9: Map of the City of La Mesa

Register No. 83Reporter's Transcript of Public Hearing, Los Angeles, June 18, 1973 [2 vol.], July23, 1973Exhibit NO.4: Political Participation of Mexican Americans in California: a Report of the CaliforniaState Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, August 1971Exhibit NO.5: Community of Venice [map]Exhibit NO.6: [Group of documents]

Senate Bill No. 195, Amended in Assembly June 5, 1973

Assembly Bill No. 164, Amended in Senate June 1,1973

John W. Stark July 10, 1973

Napa County July 10, 1973Board ofSupervisors

George A. July 11, 1973Bulj an, Mayor

Betty Slionys, July 11, 1973et al.

Mary Lee July 11,1973Krapp, et al.

Terry Lynn July 19, 1973Dodson, et al.

Betty Slionys, et al. July 11, 1973Alan Heslop, July 11, 1973Director

Phyllis Wrigley, July 20, 1973C.S.R.Bob Helland,Mayor

Frank O. July 24, 1973Nelson, C.S.R.Herman Sillas, Jr.

Louis McCammonDionMorrow

Negroes as a Percent of the Total Population in the Los Angeles Five County Area by Census Tracts --1970 [maps]Exhibit NO.7: Proposed Assembly Redistricting As It Would Affect Claremont [map], June 17, 1973 Gene BlockExhibit NO.8: Letter from Congressman Chet Holifield to Ray Rodriguez [and 7 maps], March 20, 1973 Ray Rodriguez

Register No. 84

Written Presentation by John W. Stark, July 8, 1973 John W. Stark July 10, 1973

Register No. 77Resolution No. 73-65 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, July l0,1973

Napa CountyBoard ofSupervisors

July 10, 1973

Register No. 78Written Presentation of the City of Roseville, July 9, 1973 George A.

Buljan, MayorJuly 11, 1973

Register No. 79Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62 re Reapportionment of the Second SenatorialDistrict, n.d.

Betty Slionys,et al.

July 11, 1973

Register No. 80Letter from the Sutter County Citizens for Fair Reapportionment, n.d. Mary Lee

Krapp, et al.July 11, l973

Register No. 81Presentation re Reapportionment of the Second Senatorial District, n.d. Terry Lynn

Dodson, et al.July l9, 1973

Related DocumentsStatement of Lola Cade [with notation "and signers of original copies"], n.d.Letter Supporting Senate Bill 62, n.d. Betty Slionys, et al. July 11, 1973Letter from Institute of State and Local Government, Department of Political Science, Claremont Men'sCollege, July l0, 1973 and Summary of Claremont Plan, July 10, 1973

Alan Heslop,Director

July 11, 1973

Register No. 82Recorder's Transcript of the Proceedings in San Diego, June 22, 1973, July 13, 1973 Phyllis Wrigley,

C.S.R.July 20, 1973

Exhibit 9: Map of the City of La Mesa Bob Helland,Mayor

Register No. 83Reporter's Transcript of Public Hearing, Los Angeles, June 18, 1973 [2 vol.], July23, 1973

Frank O.Nelson, C.S.R.

July 24, 1973

Exhibit No. 4: Political Participation of Mexican Americans in California: a Report of the CaliforniaState Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights, August 1971

Herman Sillas, Jr.

Exhibit No. 5: Community of Venice [map] Louis McCammonExhibit No. 6: [Group of documents]

Senate Bill No. 195, Amended in Assembly June 5, 1973

Assembly Bill No. 164, Amended in Senate June l,1973

Negroes as a Percent of the Total Population in the Los Angeles Five County Area by Census Tracts --1970 [maps]

Dion Morrow

Exhibit No. 7: Proposed Assembly Redistricting As It Would Affect Claremont [map], June 17, 1973 Gene BlockExhibit No. 8: Letter from Congressman Chet Holifield to Ray Rodriguez [and 7 maps], March 20, 1973 Ray Rodriguez

Register No. 84

Letter from Reapportionment Research Committee, Fairfax Democratic Club [with 1Lenore Wax,map and 1 computer printout], July 23, 1973 Chairman

July 26, 1973

Register No. 85Letter from Democratic Women of Orange County [with 1 map], July 26, 1973 Billie F.

McPeek,President

July 30, 1973

Register No. 86Assembly Critique of Beverly Plan and CISLOG PlanLetter, July 25, 1973

Assembly Reapportionment Committee Analysis of Beverly Modifications to SB195 [computer printout], n.d.

Assembly Reapportionment Committee of the CISLOG Plan [computer printout]

Carl D'Agostino August 1, 1973and Michael B.Berman

Register No. 87Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, San Francisco, June 28,1973 [2 vo1.]

Related DocumentsPress Release #349 re Governor's Veto of SB 195, June 28,1973

Memorandum re Hearings of June 28-29 -- Salient Issues, n.d.

Peggy K.Kirschner,C.S.R.

Office of Governor,Ronald ReaganGordon E. Baker,Consultant

August 23, 1973

Register No. 88Letter re Boundaries of "Communities of Interest" [County of Los Angeles], fromWestern Center on Law and Poverty, June 20, 1973

Stanton 1. Price August 6, 1973

Register No. 89Reporter' s Transcript of Hearing, Sacramento, June 12, 1973, August 15, 1973

Related DocumentsStatement of Mike D. Antonovich, n.d. [different from testimony], n.d.

Jack W.Moncrief,C.S.R.

Mike D.Antonovich

August 20, 1973

Register No. 90Statement of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to SupplementalPresentation of Petitioners, 41 Members of the Congress of the United States,August 21, 1973

Register No. 91Letter to Justice Coughlin re the Division of San Mateo County, August 21, 1973

Congressman August 23, 1973McCloskey

Senator Milton August 23, 1973Marks

Register No. 92Reporter's Transcript of Hearing Held in San Francisco, June 29, 1973, n.d. Peggy K. August 23, 1973

Letter from Reapportionment Research Committee, Fairfax Democratic Club [with 1map and 1 computer printout], July 23, 1973

Lenore Wax,Chairman

July 26, 1973

Register No. 85Letter from Democratic Women of Orange County [with 1 map], July 26, 1973 Billie F.

McPeek,President

July 30, 1973

Register No. 86Assembly Critique of Beverly Plan and CISLOG PlanLetter, July 25, 1973 Carl D'Agostino

and Michael B.Berman

August 1, 1973

Assembly Reapportionment Committee Analysis of Beverly Modifications to SB195 [computer printout], n.d.

Assembly Reapportionment Committee of the CISLOG Plan [computer printout]

Register No. 87Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, San Francisco, June 28, 1973 [2 vol.] Peggy K.

Kirschner,C.S.R.

August 23, 1973

Related DocumentsPress Release #349 re Governor's Veto of SB 195, June 28, 1973 Office of Governor,

Ronald ReaganMemorandum re Hearings of June 28-29 -- Salient Issues, n.d. Gordon E. Baker,

Consultant

Register No. 88Letter re Boundaries of "Communities of Interest" [County of Los Angeles], fromWestern Center on Law and Poverty, June 20, 1973

Stanton J. Price August 6, 1973

Register No. 89Reporter's Transcript of Hearing, Sacramento, June 12, 1973, August 15, 1973 Jack W.

Moncrief,C.S.R.

August 20, 1973

Related DocumentsStatement of Mike D. Antonovich, n.d. [different from testimony], n.d. Mike D.

Antonovich

Register No. 90Statement of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to SupplementalPresentation of Petitioners, 41 Members of the Congress of the United States,August 21, 1973

CongressmanMcCloskey

August 23, 1973

Register No. 91Letter to Justice Coughlin re the Division of San Mateo County, August 21, 1973 Senator Milton

MarksAugust 23, 1973

Register No. 92Reporter's Transcript of Hearing Held in San Francisco, June 29, 1973, n.d. Peggy K. August 23, 1973

Related DocumentsCensus Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Plastic OverlayChicano CommunityCongressional DistrictsSB 195, June 4, 1973Statement [different from testimony] and map, June 29, 1973

Kirschner,C.S.R.

California RuralLegal Assistance

Bill Lockyer n.d.

Register No. 93Reporter's Transcript of Hearings Held in San Francisco, July 5 and 6,1973, August Peggy K.21, 1973 Kirschner,

C.S.R.Related DocumentsSchedule, San Francisco, July 6, 1973

August 23, 1973

n.d.

Register No. 94Affidavit of Mailing ... a Copy of the Report and Recommendations of SpecialMasters on Reapportionment, August 31, 1973

Register No. 95Requests to Appear for Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court on October 30,1973 [Various Dates]

Register No. 96Communications Regarding Masters' Report [Various Dates]

Related Documents [not listed]

Letter from Automobile Club of Southern California, September 18, 1973

Telegram from City of San Diego, September 28, 1973

Teela Baca n.d.

Various [Various Dates]Correspondents

[Various Sept. 11-Correspondents] N ov. 1973

William W.Escherich,Mgr., TravelResearch andPublicationsPete Wilson,Mayor

Register No. 97Press Clippings [Various

Publications][Various Dates]

Kirschner,C.S.R.

Related DocumentsCensus Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Plastic OverlayChicano CommunityCongressional DistrictsSB 195, June 4, 1973

California RuralLegal Assistance

Statement [different from testimony] and map, June 29, 1973 Bill Lockyer n.d.

Register No. 93Reporter's Transcript of Hearings Held in San Francisco, July 5 and 6, 1973, August21, 1973

Peggy K.Kirschner,C.S.R.

August 23, 1973

Related DocumentsSchedule, San Francisco, July 6, 1973 n.d.

Register No. 94Affidavit of Mailing ... a Copy of the Report and Recommendations of SpecialMasters on Reapportionment, August 31, 1973

Teela Baca n.d.

Register No. 95Requests to Appear for Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court on October 30,1973 [Various Dates]

VariousCorrespondents

[Various Dates]

Register No. 96Communications Regarding Masters' Report [Various Dates] [Various

Correspondents]Sept. 11-Nov. 1973

Related Documents [not listed]Letter from Automobile Club of Southern California, September 18, 1973 William W.

Escherich,Mgr., TravelResearch andPublications

Telegram from City of San Diego, September 28, 1973 Pete Wilson,Mayor

Register No. 97Press Clippings [Various

Publications][Various Dates]


Documents are arranged by case number and by date of filing.

[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands styIe sheets.]

Description of Document

SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification]

[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings],January 4, 1966

Presentor

Conrad G. Tuohey

Date Filed

SACRAMENTO NO. 7814

SACRAMENTO NO. 7815

PHIL SILVER, et aI., Petitioners,

v.RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et aI.,Respondents.

ABE VICKTER, et aI., Petitioners,

v.RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et aI.,Respondents.

THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors.

Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan," Charles 1. Conrad,November 8, 1967 Assemblyman

Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet]

November 8, 1967

AB NO.2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)

Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary linebetween the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November7, 1967Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistrictingplan," November 10, 1967

AB No. 3 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)

Amendments Req. #27182

Amendments Req. #27266Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps]Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November1967) [statistics]Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical

William T. Bagley,Assemblyman

Jack R. Fenton,Assemblyman

Jack R. Fenton, AssemblymanJack R. Fenton, Assemblyman

Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman

November 9, 1967

November 10, 1967

Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal CasesDocuments are arranged by case number and by date of filing.

[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]

Description of Document Presentor Date Filed

SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification]

[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings],January 4, 1966

Conrad G. Tuohey

SACRAMENTO NO. 7814 PHIL SILVER, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al.,Respondents.

SACRAMENTO NO. 7815 ABE VICKTER, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al.,Respondents.

THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OFTHE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors.

Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan,"November 8, 1967

Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet]


Charles J. Conrad,Assemblyman

November 8, 1967

Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary linebetween the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November7, 1967

William T. Bagley,Assemblyman

November 9, 1967

Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistrictingplan," November 10, 1967




Jack R. Fenton,Assemblyman

November 10, 1967

Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps] Jack R. Fenton, AssemblymanProposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November1967) [statistics]

Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman

Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman

http://www.netscape.com/http://www.microsoft.com/ie/

summary]

Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State'sCongressional Districts," November 10, 1967

John F. McCarthy, StateSenator

November 10, 1967

Affidavit of Service by Mail

Amendments to SB NO.2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176

Statistical Summary

Los Angeles County [map]

Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Including County Supervisorsthe County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts and Joseph A. BallBrief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the Vickter [None]Plan, n.d.

November 10, 1967

November 10, 1967

November 10, 1967

SACRAMENTO NO. 7917 THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, et aI., Petitioners,

v.ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor ofthe State of California, et aI., Respondents.

Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list]Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8,1971

[None]Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971

December 20, 1971

December 23, 1971

December 15, 1971

December 21, 1971

December 20, 1971December 21, 1971

G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of theSupreme Court]Herman F. SelvinDaniel Hays Lowenstein

Evelle 1. Younger, AttorneyGeneralRobert S. Daggett

Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writof Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, December 21, 1971Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points andAuthorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr.,on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate, n.d.

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibitionor Mandate, n.d.

Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing of Herman F. SelvinOpposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jf.,December 15, 1971Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Restraining Evelle 1. Younger, Attorney December 15, 1971Order, December 15, 1971 GeneralAlternative Writ of Mandate, n.d. Chief Justice Wright December 17, 1971News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Administrative Office of theDirecting Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting, CourtsDecember 17, 1971Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d.

summary]Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State'sCongressional Districts," November 10, 1967

Affidavit of Service by Mail

Amendments to SB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176

Statistical Summary

Los Angeles County [map]

John F. McCarthy, StateSenator

November 10, 1967

Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Includingthe County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967

County Supervisors November 10, 1967

Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts andBrief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.

Joseph A. Ball November 10, 1967

Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the VickterPlan, n.d.

[None] November 10, 1967

SACRAMENTO NO. 7917 THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,

v.

ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor ofthe State of California, et al., Respondents.

Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list] [None]Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8, 1971

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibitionor Mandate, n.d.

Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971

Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing ofOpposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Pointsand Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jr.,December 15, 1971

Herman F. Selvin December 15, 1971

Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a RestrainingOrder, December 15, 1971

Evelle J. Younger, AttorneyGeneral

December 15, 1971

Alternative Writ of Mandate, n.d. Chief Justice Wright December 17, 1971News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary OrderDirecting Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting,December 17, 1971

Administrative Office of theCourts

Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d. G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of theSupreme Court]

December 20, 1971

Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971 Herman F. Selvin December 20, 1971Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writof Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points andAuthorities, December 21, 1971

Daniel Hays Lowenstein December 21, 1971

Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points andAuthorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.

Evelle J. Younger, AttorneyGeneral

December 21, 1971

Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr.,on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate, n.d.

Robert S. Daggett December 23, 1971

Herman F. SelvinVerne H. Tindell, CityAttorneyRobert G. BeverlySupreme Court

Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Robert S. DaggettBehalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of theCalifornia State Senate to Intervene as Parties or to Participate asAmici Curiae, December 22, 1971Letter to Chief Justice Wright re SAC No. 7917, December 27, 1971 Herman F. SelvinApplication for Order to File Complaint in Intervention by Way of Richards, Watson andReturn and Answer to Alternative Writ of Mandate, with Complaint; DreyfussPoints and Authorities in Support Thereof, and Order Thereon,December 27, 1971Petitioners' Reply to A