Upload
hannah-lane
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Redesigning Biology
Kathy Warner, Sharon Biederman and Chris SaxUniversity of Maryland University College
BIOL 101 and 102
• General Education Courses BIOL 101 – 3 credit (s.h.) survey course BIOL 102 – 1 credit (s.h.) lab course
• Offered in two formats Online Classes (82%) Face-to-face Classes (18 %)
• Core materials for Course Online modules developed by team at UMUC Commercially available hands-on lab kit and
additional supplies
Reasons for the Redesign
• Both Courses are on UMUC’s “Top 20 list” First course High enrollment
• Low student completion/retention rates• Variability of student experience and
content Over 30 sections/semester Students may have different faculty and
content for 101 and 102
Fully Online Model
• Greater percentage of students in online sections
• Fully online lab advantageous for student population
• Develop new model for university design of online courses
Elements of the Redesign
• Combine 2 courses, BIOL 101 and 102, into single 4 credit course, BIOL 103
• Incorporate automated feedback and student feedback
• Add tiered levels of self-check activities and interactive learning objects
• Virtual lab activities with automated feedback will replace the commercial lab kit
• Alignment of the course with state and national scientific literacy standards
Alignment
NCAT Principles• Redesign the whole
course
• Encourage active learning
• Individualized Assistance
• Ongoing assessment and prompt feedback
• Monitor Student Progress
Biology Redesign• Convert 2 courses into
one course
• Interactive learning objects and automated feedback
• Tiered levels of activities
• Automated grading of quizzes and labs
• Retention rates and final exam results
Impacts on Student Learning
• Final Exam Results• Course Completion Rates• Final Course Grades