Upload
ferdinand-johns
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The team
• IVM team: Joyeeta Gupta; Onno Kuik, economics; Constanze, international inventory, policy game; Harro van Asselt, four global regimes; Emmy Bergsma, focus on equity and effectiveness; Philipp Pattberg: review
• ICRAF team: Peter Minang et al.• Macaulay team: Maria Nijnik
Deliverables and tasks Lead PartnersD.4.1 Graphical overview of the global forest governance architecture
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T4.1 Mapping forest organizations and relevant policy documents
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay (review)
D.4.2 Report of the interlinkages between forestry-related regimes
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T.4.2 Detailed analysis of the climate change regime and 3 other related regimes
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay (review)
D.4.3 Generic table of forest policy options
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T.4.3. Literature analysis to map forest policy options
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay
D.4.4 Comprehensive report of results from regional case studies
DoW Tasks leading up to the deliverable: T.4.5 Design and preparation of three case studies T.4.6 Execute case studies T.4.7 Conduct comparative analysis
ICRAF IVM, Macaulay
D.4.5 Final report and publications
DoW Tasks leading up to the deliverable: T.4.4 Stakeholder interviews and design of a global REDD policy modelT. 4.8 Integrate results and conduct concluding workshop
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay
Table 1. Tasks and deliverables
Deliverables and tasks Lead PartnersD.4.1 Graphical overview of the global forest governance architecture
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T4.1 Mapping forest organizations and relevant policy documents
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay (review)
D.4.2 Report of the interlinkages between forestry-related regimes
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T.4.2 Detailed analysis of the climate change regime and 3 other related regimes
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay (review)
D.4.3 Generic table of forest policy options
DoW Task leading up to the deliverable: T.4.3. Literature analysis to map forest policy options
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay
D.4.4 Comprehensive report of results from regional case studies
DoW Tasks leading up to the deliverable: T.4.5 Design and preparation of three case studies T.4.6 Execute case studies T.4.7 Conduct comparative analysis
ICRAF IVM, Macaulay
D.4.5 Final report and publications
DoW Tasks leading up to the deliverable: T.4.4 Stakeholder interviews and design of a global REDD policy modelT. 4.8 Integrate results and conduct concluding workshop
IVM ICRAF, Macaulay
REDD-ALERT Year 1M1-M12
Working Document 1
“Research Protocol for REDD-ALERT WP4” (J. Gupta et al.) completed
Working Document 2
“Designing a policy exercise on REDD policy options.” (C. Haug) completed
Working Document 3
“Economics of forest policy options” (O. Kuik) completed
Deliverable D.4.1
“Graphical overview of the architecture of global forest governance” (C. Haug, H. van Asselt and J. Gupta)
completed
Deliverable D.4.2
“Report on the interlinkages between forestry-related regimes” (H. van Asselt, J. Gupta and C. Haug)
In progress
MSc thesis - 1
Marie Louise Filippini: REDD – green light for sustainable development ?” (a legal study into the feasibility of promoting sustainable development through a future REDD mechanism)
completed
MSc thesis- 2
Aizo Lijcklama à Nijeholt: “The forest convention debate. From Rio to REDD” (An international relations study that explores the reasons behind the absence of a global forestry regime)
completed
REDD-ALERT Year 2Deliverable D.4.3
“Generic table of forest policy options” (J. Gupta and C. Haug) In progress (complete by October 2010)
Working Document 4
“International organisations and their involvement in REDD. An exploration of agendas, interests and overlaps.” (V. Giannini)
In progress (complete by July 2010)
MSc thesis – 3 “Payments for Environmental Services schemes. A meta-analysis of their design and performance and lessons learnt for the design of future forest policy instruments”. (H. Shin)
In progress (complete by August 2010)
MSc thesis - 4 “Debt-for-nature swaps. A meta-analysis of their design and performance and lessons learnt for the design of future forest policy instruments” (H. Newball-Hoy)
In progress (complete by August 2010)
Msc - 5 Standards and labelling: the effectiveness of eco-labelling; a meta analysis
In progress (complete by August 2010
Workshop Medium-term non-market financing options for REDD. A policy exercise (C. Haug)
October 2010
Working Document 5
Forest policy in Indonesia September 2010
Field research Indonesia (M. Bastos Lima) October-December 2010
Working Document 6
Forest policy in Vietnam October-December 2010
Field research Vietnam (H. Shin) January-March 2011
REDD-ALERT Year 3
Working Document 7
Forest policy in Cameroon. January-March 2011
MSc thesis -6 (field research)
Cameroon April-June 2011
Working Document 8
Forest Policy in Peru April-June 2011
MSc thesis-7 (field research)
Peru July-September 2011
Working Document 8
Equity and effectiveness in national forestry governance (E. Bergsma) October 2011
Working Document 9
Equity and effectiveness in international forestry governance (E. Bergsma) October 2011
Working Document 10
Options for REDD instrument design in case-study countries (O. Kuik) October 2011
Working Document 11
The impact of REDD policy options on the international ‘leakage’ of forestry-related CO2 emissions (O. Kuik)
October 2011
Deliverable D.4.4 “Comprehensive report on results from regional case studies” (J. Gupta et al.) July 2011-April 2012
Deliverable D.4.5 “Final report including the REDD global policy model, popularised version, and scientific papers” (J. Gupta et al.) – finalization of special issue for “International Forestry Review” (?)
April 2011-April 2012
Public Private
Global level
Regional level
CBD
WHC CITESUNCCD
UNFCCC
WTO
Ramsar
ILO
UNPFII
UNFF
UNEPUNDP FAO
World Bank
IMF
FSC
C&I processes
[NGOs] [Business]
MCPFE
ATO
CBFP
AFPCCAD
Alpine Convention
ACTO
ASEAN
SADC
LRTAP
UN-REDD
ITTO
FLEG
Western Hemisphere Convention
COMIFAC
GEF
EU
PEFCC
[Donors]
CPF
Conclusions of Inventory• Governance diffuse; characterised by ad hoc
incrementalism• Few provisions on sustainable forest
management• Deforestation results from different drivers at
different levels of operation• International governance creates synergies and
conflicts• Coordination limited
Int. Forestry agreements
Int. climate & forestry ag.
National forestry gov.
Incentives & disincentive
Redesign of incentives
Human behaviour
Other driving factors
Impact on forests
Architecture: Regime designIncentives: What incentives are created?Agency: Who is pushing the regime?Access: How are basic rights affected?Allocation: How does allocation of responsibilities and risks take place?Functions: What functions are served?
Impact on timber
markets
Incentives in forest sector (national)
• Regulatory – decentralization; PAs; rules on inputs/ tech; fire prevention; allowable cuts; sustainable logging; spatial planning; timber rights; property rights; monitoring; law enforcement
• Market incentives: taxes; subsidies; voluntary programmes (CSR; certification); PES, tradeable permits; alternative incomes
• Management : CFM; Common property resource management; CNRM; stewardship; Joint forest management; NGO management; multiple use forest management
• Information: education, research; remote sensing• Measures to cope with climate change
Incentives in non-forest sectors
• Land use• Eco tourism• Credit access• Infrastructure• Education• Quality of life
Incentive in forest sector (int)
• Regulatory: level of mgt; PAs; IPR• Incentives: debt for nature; tax on timber
trade; funding mechanisms; carbon markets• Information – forest labeling; timber
certification
Closed interviews, Q method Macaulay)
Normal Distribution of the Q-sort
-3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3Disagree Agree