102
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com s [email protected] 717-669-2163 Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS _______________________________________________________________________________ Lisa Michelle Lambert : PETITIONER : : v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015 : Lynn Bissonnette, et al., : RESPONDANT : : Stanley J. Caterbone : APPELLANT : SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT “EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, the U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015 ” _______________________________________________________________________ I hereby on this 8 th day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this case. In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice. The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond. This was an outright effort to extort monies from the APPELLANT and in the long term make service of the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma Pauperis Status, by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S. Marshalls. This tactic, in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the APPELLANT. The Judges used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the illegal tactic, however, attached are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United States District Court with financial affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts exceeding $10,000.00, all prior to 2015. This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the 15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 1 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015 Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015

Citation preview

Page 1: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

s [email protected]

Stanley J. Caterbone, APPELLANT, Pro Se

Advanced Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

_______________________________________________________________________________Lisa Michelle Lambert :

PETITIONER : :

v. : CASE NO. 3400-2015:

Lynn Bissonnette, et al., : RESPONDANT :

:Stanley J. Caterbone :

APPELLANT :

SUBMISSION AS EXHIBIT BY APPELANT

“EXHIBIT re In Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts,

the U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015 ”

_______________________________________________________________________

I hereby on this 8th day of December, 2015, submit for considerations in the above captioned

case the attached document as an EXHIBIT to be considered by the court in the deliberations of this

case. In 2015 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas began a campaign of DENYING In

Forma Pauperis Applications, and demanding that current cases with legitimate In Forma Pauperis

Status be DENIED in an effort to again subvert the laws of due process and obstruction of justice.

The Superior Court had followed, as did the U.S. District Court in this case by Judge Diamond. This

was an outright effort to extort monies from the APPELLANT and in the long term make service of

the complaints cost prohibitive due to the fact that Pro Se Litigants with In Forma Pauperis Status,

by law, receive free service from the Lancaster County Sheriffs and the U.S. Marshalls. This tactic,

in the end, would have effectively dismissed all legitimate claims of the APPELLANT. The Judges

used the excuse of monies in bank accounts as the rationale for the illegal tactic, however, attached

are 5 cases of GRANTED In Forma Pauperis applications in both the Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas, the Pennsylvania Superior Court, and the United States District Court with financial

affidavits containing amounts of monies in bank accounts exceeding $10,000.00, all prior to 2015.

This exhibit, like the previous EXHIBITS, is intended to help the Court understand the

complexity of the APPELLANT'S obligation to provide the Court with the evidence and insight to

support the APPELLANT'S claims and statements. These documents will also provide the Court with

sufficient knowledge of the APPELLANT'S claim of the value of the

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 1 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 2: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Appellant's litigation of up to $50 million dollars as stated in the U.S. Bankruptcy Case No. 05-

23059. The APPELLANT does not intend to overburden the Court with unnecessary filings, however

this burden of supporting the claims and statements falls on the shoulders of all those in the

government that ignored the APPELLANT'S pleas for help to resolve these issues dating back to the

days immediately following the meeting with International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC) Executive

Larry Resch on June 23, 1987.

This information could explain the COINTELPRO attributes of my situation and persons under

oath of law must refer this to the U.S. Attorney's Office and provide me with relief.

/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Date: December 8, 2015 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Appellant1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603(717)-669-2163

s [email protected] http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 2 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 3: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal TABLE OF CONTENTS December 8, 2015

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCase No. 14-02559, Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus CorpusOrder Appealed: Motion for Summary Judgement

15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT re In Forma PauperisFRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, the

U.S. District Court, and the PA Superior Court, December 8, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Dec 8, 2015 - 15-3400 Cover Page for the Exhibit re In Forma Pauperis Fraud

2. Nov 13, 2015 - Case No. 1915 MDA 2015 IFP Fraud Argument Superior Court

3. Dec 8, 2015 - Listing of 29 FALSE ARRESTS of Stan J. Caterbone from 1987to Present in Lancaster County

4. June 2009 - Millersville University WANTED Poster Issued for No Trespass Notice Posted on Campus

5. May 13, 2009 - Millersville University Graduate Studies Acceptance Letter

6. Dec 6, 2015 - ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

7. Nov 13, 2015 - 1915 MDA 2015 In Forma Pauperis Financial Affidavit for Application of November 13, 2015

8. Nov 30, 2015 - Case No. 15-10167 In Forma Pauperis DENIED Judge Wright

9. 1) Dec 8, 2008 - Case No. 08-13373 In Forma Pauperis GRANTED Judge Madenspacher

10. Dec 1, 2008 - Case No. 08-13373 In Forma Pauperis Application11. 2) Nov 30, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-11822 In Forma Pauperis GRANTED

Judge Reinaker

12. Nov 29, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-11822 In Forma Pauperis Application

13. 3) Nov 13, 2008 - Superior Court Case No. CI-07-05230 [G1602] In Forma Pauperis GRANTED

14. 4) May 5, 2007 - Case No. CI-07-03924 [G1410] In Forma Pauperis GRANTED

Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 3 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 4: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal TABLE OF CONTENTS December 8, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

15. 5) Apr 6, 2010 - U.S. District Court Case No. 5:10-cv-01558-MAM In Forma Pauperis GRANTED

16. Advanced Media Group Press Released re Proposed Organized Stalking Bill

17. Notarized Affidavits for Press Release and Executive Summary of November 28, 2015

18. Proposed Organized Stalking Bill

19. May 2015 Richmond California City Ordinance to Ban Space Based Weapons and Weapons of Mind Control

20. Cover Page for Executive Summary

21. Executive Summary

22. Updates for Executive Summary October 10, 2015

23. History of Federal Whistleblowing Case and Targeted Individual

24. The Courts and the United States Legal System

25. Family History

26. The Public Record

27. Is Lancaster County Ground Zero for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

28. Affidavit of Joinment of October 10, 2015

29. 29 FALSE ARRESTS RECORD Since 1987

30. 21 ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES

31. Stan Caterbone's Notarized Affidavit for FFCHS September 16, 2010 Redacted Version

32. Stan Caterbone's Detailed Victimization Affidavit of 2010

33. Samuel P Caterbone US Sponsored Mind Control Affidavit 1996

34. Sammy A. Caterbone Affidavit of US Sponsored Mind Control 1991

Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 4 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 5: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 3 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 5 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 6: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 4 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 6 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 7: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 5 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 7 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 8: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 6 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 8 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 9: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 7 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 9 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 10: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 8 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 10 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 11: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 9 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015This poster was posted all over the MillersvilleUniversity Campus. I had done nothing but complainto the Millersville University staff of stalking,harassment, assaults, and computer hacking.

This all happened becuase Ihad to use the library computersbecause the County Libraryused the same tactic. I didand was accepted into theGraduate Studies Program andwas in the midst of selectinga major for Grad School.

To this day, PeteAnders,Chief of MillersvilleUniversity Police, stillwill not let me on anyMillersville UniversityFacility. I was barredfrom attending the 2015Homecoming Game, and inNovember barred from aLancaster Chamber ofCommerce Event, I am acurrent member, held atthe Ware Center indowntown Lancaster.

Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 11 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 12: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 10 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 12 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 13: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 11 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 13 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 14: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

s [email protected]

www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.comwww.scribd.com/amgroup01

www.facebook.com/scaterbonewww.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbonehttp://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

1250 Fremont StreetLancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPViolations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination

and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to AuthoritiesDecember 6, 2015

Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy – Issue a few every

year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition toisolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from

defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strongChristian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The

Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial ofentitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during

the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of2005, original not signed by David Pflumm

2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing

Fulton Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,

Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with BarleySnyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster CityPolice in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006

7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael

Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John

Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice

11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director inMarch of 2009, by 1st Class Mail

12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by

Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 12 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 14 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 15: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No

Formal Notice16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police

Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.

18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, SecurityOfficer.

19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reasonwas for complaining of harassment and stalking.

20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University PoliceChief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,

Debra Hoeckler21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,

with no reason and no written notice.22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and

was told by bartender to leave and not come back.23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me

communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.

24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complainregarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

25.Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Nortwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in

Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to LegalCounsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.

Dated: September 27, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 13 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 15 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 16: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 14 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 16 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 17: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 15 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 17 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 18: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 16 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 18 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 19: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 17 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 19 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 20: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 18 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 20 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 21: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 19 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 21 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 22: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 20 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 22 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 23: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 21 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 23 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 24: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 22 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 24 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 25: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 23 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 25 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 26: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 24 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 26 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 27: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 25 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 27 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 28: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 26 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 28 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 29: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 27 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 29 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 30: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 28 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 30 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 31: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 29 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 31 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 32: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 30 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 32 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 33: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 31 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 33 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 34: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 32 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 34 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 35: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 33 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 35 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 36: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 34 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 36 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 37: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 35 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 37 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 38: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 36 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 38 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 39: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Close

Entry Date/Time:

Entry Category:

Notes:

Clear

Docket Entry Attachments

Entry Details

12/8/2008 01:53:00 PM

ORDER (NO FEE)

ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008, UPON

PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ATTACHED INFORMATION, REGARDING THE

REQUEST OF STANLEY J. CATERBONE TO FILE IFP SAID REQUEST IS GRANTED. BY THE

COURT: JOSEPH C. MADENSPACHER, JUDGE. CC'S WITH 236 NOTICE TO: BEVERLY J.

POINTS, ESQ., STANLEY J. CATERBONE, (6)

No attachments exist for this record.

View Selected (Merged)

Public Web Us

C

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILSSTANLEY J CATERBONE vs. DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER AT LANCASTER COUNT

CountySuite Civil Court http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(oqsmja55nwg...

1 of 1 12/5/2015 12:54 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 37 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 39 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 40: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 38 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 40 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 41: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 39 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 41 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 42: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 40 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 42 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 43: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 41 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 43 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 44: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 42 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 44 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 45: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 43 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 45 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 46: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Close

Entry Date/Time:

Entry Category:

Notes:

Clear

Docket Entry Attachments |

Entry Details

11/30/2007 12:28:00 PM

ORDER (NO FEE)

ORDER (NO FEE) AND NOW, UPON PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE

ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF STANLEY J. CATERBONE TO FILE

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SAID REQUEST IS HEREBY GRANTED. BY THE COURT, DENNIS

REINAKER, JUDGE.

No attachments exist for this record.

View Selected (Merged)

Public Web User Home

CI-07-11822

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILSSTANLEY J CATERBONE vs. COMMONWEALTH OF PA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

CountySuite Civil Court http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(iyyeheu2l2mu...

1 of 1 12/5/2015 4:59 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 44 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 46 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 47: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Close

Entry Date/Time:

Entry Category:

Notes:

Clear

Docket Entry Attachments

Entry Details

11/29/2007 02:47:00 PM

PETITION - IFP- GENERAL

PETITION - IFP- GENERAL TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH AFFIDAVIT OF

FINANCIAL STATUS FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF, PRO SE

No attachments exist for this record.

View Selected (Merged)

Public Web Us

C

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILSSTANLEY J CATERBONE vs. COMMONWEALTH OF PA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

CountySuite Civil Court http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(oqsmja55nwg...

1 of 1 12/5/2015 1:07 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 45 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 47 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 48: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Close

Entry Date/Time:

Entry Category:

Notes:

Clear

Docket Entry Attachments

Entry Details

11/13/2008 12:03:00 PM

RECORD RETURNED

RECORD RETURNED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA - NO. 1103 MDA

2007. APPEAL OF STANLEY J. CATERBONE FROM THE ORDER ENTERED JUNE 6, 2007,

DENYING HIS APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SINCE THE

RECORD INDICATES THAT APPELLANT DID FILE A CONFORMING AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

OF HIS PETITION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AS IS REQUIRED BY

PA.R.C.P. 240(C), (H), AND THERE IS NO FACTUAL DISPUTE AS TO THE AVERMENTS

CONTAINED THEREIN, WE FIND NO SUPPORT FOR THE DECISION OF THE TRIAL COURT

TO DENY IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS TO APPELLANT. THEREFORE WE REVERSE THE

ORDER OF THE TRIAL COURT, AND PERMIT APPELLANT TO PROCEED WITH HIS APPEAL.

ORDER REVERSED. CASE REMANDED FOR PROCEEDING CONSISTENT WITH THIS

MEMORANDUM. JURISDICTION RELINQUISHED. JUDGMENT ENTERED. OCTOBER 1,

2008.

11/13/2008 12:00:00 AM CI-07-05230 [G1602]

View Selected (Merged)

Public Web Us

C

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILSSTANLEY J CATERBONE vs. COMMONWEALTH OF PA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

Date Description

CountySuite Civil Court http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(oqsmja55nwg...

1 of 1 12/5/2015 1:12 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 46 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 48 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 49: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Close

Entry Date/Time:

Entry Category:

Notes:

Clear

Docket Entry Attachments

Entry Details

5/9/2007 09:58:00 AM

ORDER (NO FEE)

ORDER (NO FEE) FILED. AND NOW, 9TH DAY OF MAY 2007, UPON PRESENTATION AND

CONSIDERATION OF THE APPLICATION TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS HEREBY

GRANTED. BY THE COURT, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, SENIOR JUDGE. COPIES W/236

NOTICES TO: STANELY CATERBONE, SAM LOMBARDO, COPY MAX

5/9/2007 12:00:00 AM CI-07-03924 [G1410]

View Selected (Merged)

Public Web Us

C

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILSSTANLEY J CATERBONE vs. COPY MAX

Date Description

CountySuite Civil Court http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(oqsmja55nwg...

1 of 1 12/5/2015 1:14 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 47 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 49 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 50: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

CLOSED,A/R,SPECIAL

United States District Court

Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Allentown)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:10-cv-01558-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al

Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN

related Case: 5:09-cv-05205-MAM

Case in other court: USCA Third Circuit, 10-02313

Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Date Filed: 04/06/2010

Date Terminated: 04/14/2010

Jury Demand: None

Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other

Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP represented by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

C/O STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET

LANCASTER, PA 17603

PRO SE

Plaintiff

STANLEY J. CATERBONE represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE

1250 FREMONT STREET

LANCASTER, PA 17603

717-669-2163

Email: [email protected]

PRO SE

V.

Defendant

FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Defendant

MR. R. SCOTT SMITH

CHAIRMAN AND CEO

Defendant

MR. PHILLIP WENGER

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF FULTON FINANCIAL

CORPORATION

Defendant

MR. RUFUS FULTON

FORMER CHAIRMAN AND CEO AND CURRENT MEMBER OF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Defendant

SUSAN A. FOLLMER

SECURITY OFFICER OF FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Defendant

FULTON BANK

Defendant

MR. CRAIG RODA

PRESIDENT OF FULTON BANK

Defendant

MR. FERNANDO SANCHEZ

MANOR BRANCH MANAGER AT FULTON BANK

Defendant

MANHIEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT

Defendant

MR. NEIL HARKINS

CHIEF OF MANHIEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT

Defendant

MS. STEPHANIE CARFLEY

ESQ., PARTNER OF BARLEY SNYDER, LLC

Defendant

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?255873267151325-L_1_0-1

1 of 2 12/5/2015 1:25 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 48 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 50 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 51: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

MR. SHAWN LONG

ESQ.

Defendant

HARTMAN UNDERHILL AND BRUBAKER, LLC

Defendant

MR. CHRIS UNDERHILL

ESQ., UNDERHILL, BRUBAKER AND HARTMAN, LLC

Defendant

MARGARET A. MILLER

JUDGE FOR THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON

PLEAS

Defendant

BARLEY SNYDER, LLC

Date Filed # Docket Text

04/06/2010 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, STANLEY J. CATERBPME..(jmv, ) (Entered: 04/12/2010)

04/14/2010 2 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO FILE AN

AMENDED COMPLAINT, WHICH CONTAINS THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY RULE 8(a) OF THE FRCP, WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE

OF THIS ORDER. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT, THE CLERK SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE

COURT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON

4/14/10.) 4/14/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(gn, ) Modified on 4/15/2010 (gn, ). (Entered: 04/14/2010)

04/14/2010 3 COMPLAINT against defts' BARLEY SNYDER, LLC, STEPHANIE CARFLEY, SUSAN A. FOLLMER, RUFUS FULTON, FULTON BANK, FULTON

FINANCIAL CORPORATION, NEIL HARKINS, HARTMAN UNDERHILL AND BRUBAKER, LLC, SHAWN LONG, MANHIEM TOWNSHIP

POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARGARET A. MILLER, CRAIG RODA, FERNANDO SANCHEZ, R. SCOTT SMITH, CHRIS UNDERHILL, PHILLIP

WENGER, filed by plffs' STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP. (ifp)(gn, ) (Entered: 04/14/2010)

05/04/2010 4 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 2 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA,

Appeals Clerk (gn, ) (Entered: 05/05/2010)

05/04/2010 5 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 4 Notice of Appeal : (gn, ) (Entered: 05/05/2010)

05/14/2010 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 4 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case Number 10-2313 (gn, )

(Entered: 05/17/2010)

08/25/2010 6 ORDER of USCA dated 8/25/10 that the foregoing appeal is dismissed as to Stanley Caterbone and Advanced Media Group for lack of appellate juisdiction.

(gn, ) (Entered: 08/26/2010)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

12/05/2015 13:24:43

PACER Login: am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 5:10-cv-01558-MAM

Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.20

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?255873267151325-L_1_0-1

2 of 2 12/5/2015 1:25 PM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 49 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 51 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 52: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

YouTube ([email protected]) Add to contacts 2:37 AM

To: Stan Caterbone

Hi Stan Caterbone,

Due to a copyright claim, your YouTube video has been blocked in some

countries. This means that your video is still up on YouTube, but people in

some countries may not be able to watch it.

Video title: Lancaster Catholic Football 1974 1975 Season Tri County

Champs My Junior Year Number 36, Dec 7, 2015

Copyrighted song: Chances Are (Album Version)

Claimed by: UMG

Why this can happen

Your video might contain copyrighted content.

Copyright owners can choose to block YouTube videos that contain

their content.

- The YouTube Team

Help center • Email options • Report spam

©2015 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066

© 2015 Microsoft Terms Privacy & cookies Developers English (United States)

Inbox

Current Events 2

Lancaster Chamber 4

PA Legislators 13

PETE ANDERS

Junk 60

Drafts 9

Sent

Deleted

AA Inbox 41

Deed and City Rehab

Delete Email Address 20

Ebay and Online Purcha

Electronic Filing 6

Facebook

Fax Folder 184

FFCHS Communications

Geek Squad 8

Go Fund Me 2

Lambert Case 21

LinkedIn 16

May-June Surge 51

Mind Control Research

PNC Bank 33

Saved Sent

Truthdig 2

Folders

New folder

[Copyright claim] Your video has been blocked in some countries: "Lancaster

Catholic Football 1974 1975 Season Tri County Champs My Junior Year Number 36,

Dec 7, 2015"

New Reply Delete Archive Junk Sweep Move to Categories Stan J. Caterbone

Outlook.com - [email protected] https://col131.mail.live.com/?tid=cmqPWBV7Wc5RGcuwAeC8xYDg2...

1 of 1 12/7/2015 5:48 AM

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 50 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 52 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 53: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

[email protected]

https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

(717)669-2163

PRESS RELEASE

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED

STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.

The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to

individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons.

Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. He has also been telepathic since 2005. Stan J. Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental telepathy and synthetic

telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts. We are urging you to contact your local representatives and support our efforts to pass this

legislation. Below you will find the listings of Pennsylvania State Representatives.

For More Information Please Contact Us At: [email protected] and visit our library of

documents at https://www.scribd.com/stan5j.5caterbone

_________________________________________________

The draft of the legislation can be found on the following page:

Page 1

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 51 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 53 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 54: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 52 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 54 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 55: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

District Office

Second Street

King City Mo.

660-535-6664

To Whom It May Concern,

This letter is to ask for your help for the many constituents in our country who are being affected unjustly

by electronic weapons torture and covert harassment groups. Serious privacy rights violation and physical

injuries have been caused by the activities of these groups and their use of so-called non-lethal weapons on

men, women, and even children.

I am asking you to play a role in helping these victims and also stopping the massive movement in the use

of Veri-chip and RFID technologies in tracking Americans.

Long before Veri-chip was known we were testing these devices on Americans, many without their

knowledge or consent.

There are new revelations of the cancer risk besides the privacy and human rights problems with the use of

Veri-chip and RF signals.

I am asking for your help in stopping these abuses and aiding those already affected.

Sincerely,

Rep. Jim Guest

May 21, 2009

Capitol Office

State Capitol

Jefferson City Mo.

573-751-0246

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 53 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 55 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 56: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill

Section 1. Short Title -

This bill may be cited as the “Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

Bill”””

Section 2. Findings and Purpose

A) Findings

1) The constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration

of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights and that among

these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, “the framers of the Constitution sought

"to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is for

this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.“

3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states that with respect to human research, the

voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must be competent, informed, and comprehending.

4)There are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere to

Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United States Senate resolution of ratification of the

Convention.

B) Purpose

To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type of electronic frequency devices,

directed energy devices, implants, surveillance technology, and directed energy weapon to

purposefully cause any of the following: stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture, diseases, and death to any United States citizen.

Section 3. Organized Stalking

If two or more persons willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously

harass another person and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment,

or by imprisonment in a federal prison.

If two or more persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,

injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three,

or four years.

For the purposes of this section, "harass" means engages in a knowing and willful course of

conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the

person, or damages his personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *

Page 2

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 54 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 56 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 57: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a

period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected

activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that

performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern

of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target

of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to

prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."

For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited

to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any

contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his

or her immediate family.

For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person

related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly

resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

Section 4. Punishment for threats

Any person or persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great

bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in

writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and

thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year..

For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or

not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly

resided in the household.

"Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones,

computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices

Obscene, threatening or annoying communication

(a) Every person or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by

means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the

person or any member of his or her family, or any property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.

Page 3

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 55 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 57 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 58: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

(b) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by

means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or

electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c) Every person or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand

dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:

(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any

combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.

(2) The person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of

an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic

contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.

(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where

the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed

when the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a

telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.

(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person

or persons convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.

(g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not

limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.

Section 5. Assault and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon

Any person or persons who in the course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault

upon the person of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by

imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000).

For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon is defined as any device that

directs a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of

inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,

Page 4

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 56 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 58 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 59: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies

directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

Page 5

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 57 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 59 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 60: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based weapons

May 20, 2015

FacebookTwitterMore9 comments

The Richmond City Council passed a resolution Tuesday supporting a ban on space-based weapons after a lengthy discussion over whether individuals are being psychologically

and physically harmed by exotic government-patented attacks from high in the sky.

Councilmember Jovanka Beckles, a member of the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA),

introduced the resolution, saying it begins to address concerns of a Richmond resident who claims she’s been targeted by “remote transmission” from space-based weaponry.

Others claiming to have suffered physical and psychological attacks traveled from around the country to speak at Tuesday’s council meeting. One speaker claimed to have been

zapped multiple times right before his testimony at council.

The resolution supports the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty

permanently banning “space-based weapons,” even though the legislation first introduced by Rep. Dennis Kucinich in 2001 has never gained traction in Congress. It appears that

Richmond is the first municipality in the U.S. to take up this lofty issue in more than a decade. In 2002, the City of Berkeley passed a similar resolution supporting the ban.

Conspiracy theorists believe the resolution is a step toward ensuring secret weaponry such as chemtrails, which are trails left in the sky by high-flying aircraft that supposedly

emit a chemical or biological agent, can no longer target unwitting citizens. For RPA members on the council, the resolution is also an anti-war initiative.

RPA members on council, Gayle McLaughlin and Eduardo Martinez, also voted in favor of the resolution. Vice Mayor Jael Myrick and Councilmember Nat Bates were the final two

yes votes, although Bates claimed he was confused by the discussion.

“I’m going to support the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of

Page 8

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 58 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 60 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 61: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

dumb ideas,” Bates said.

Mayor Tom Butt voted no, saying he believes the conspiracy theory behind space-based

weapons is above the heads of city leaders and has taken time away from more pressing city matters such as the budget deficit, potholes, and crime. Butt has complained in the

past about the RPA attempting to hijack council sessions to push a radical agenda regardless of whether the issues are important to Richmond residents.

The mayor also pointed to a signed 1967 treaty banning the militarization of space.

The other dissenting vote came from Councilmember Vinay Pimple, who pointed out that

supporting a limitation on the ability of the U.S. to defend against attacks from long-range missiles might not be wise.

Pimple disputed what he called “knee-jerk” reactions from RPA members who depicted President Ronald Reagan’s proposed space-based anti-missile program of 1983, known as

the “Star Wars” initiative, as inherently evil. The Cold War initiative was intended to defend against USSR missiles during the Cold War and was shelved not for the project’s

moral ambiguity but its perceived effectiveness, Pimple said.

The idea behind Star Wars, Pimple said, “is you can knock out someone’s weapons long

before they enter your air space. The U.S. used Patriot missiles to knock out Iraqi Scuds targeting Israel and Saudi Arabia, he added.

RPA members, however, argued that this issue is not just about war but about the individuals in the U.S. who believe governments are using futuristic weapons in space for

the purpose of inflicting pain and mind control. Martinez argued that they may very well be telling the truth. He recalled a science fiction novel he wrote a paper on during college

that predicted truths 20 years in advance.

“It’s easy for me to see that things which are wrong can happen because we have the

wrong mindset,” Martinez said.

Myrick said he supported the resolution because he doesn’t support war.

“The weaponization of space…is something I think is extremely immoral and we should not be as a nation engaging in,” Myrick said. “Maybe some wars are unavoidable, that

may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country away from that mindset…..that’s why I support this resolution.”

Amy Lee Anderson, a “targeted individual” who brought the matter to Beckles’ attention, was thankful that the council took up the issue.

“No where in the United States, no targeted individual can get this support,” Anderson said. “We just needed one person, one city. Because of that, you all our heroes. We are

dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no experience to fathom it, it’s so sophisticated.”

Related posts:

1. Richmond councilmember pushes city resolution banning ‘exotic’ space-based

weapons

2. Dirty bomb drill in Richmond alarms conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones

Comments

1. C’mon Richmond Standard….your bias is showing!

Page 9

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 59 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 61 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 62: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Stan J. CaterboneADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

[email protected]

717-669-2163

October 10, 2015

Federal Whistleblower and

Targeted Individual (Victim) of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control

Executive Summary©

Updated on October 10, 2015

I remain,

Stan J. Caterbone

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced MediaGroup are victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both

Federal and State courts seeking financial remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties andhis Constitutional Rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while managing the financial firm the he

founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a Federal Whistleblowerwhen, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms dealer

and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted andplead guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion and selling arms to Irag via

South Africa. In June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Courtfor the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus

Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court ofAppeals, Case No. 15-3400.

Page 1 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 60 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 62 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 63: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,

&

STAN J. CATERBONEFederal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)

Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Controland Directed Energy Devices and Weapons

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

copyright 2009

“Ya know what, I am beginning to analyze this War on Terror and am having difficulty understanding

it all. To me the most effective fundamental fight against Extreme Terrorism is to reduce the motive; or theHatred Against America. No one seems to talk about that subject. How do we reduce that Hatred Towards

America and the West?

See, from my perspective, my situation is very disturbing. I mean we have the United States Torturing Me, aU.S. Citizen for no good or valid reason. I have warned EVERYONE about using my situation to feed this

HATRED towards America.

Low and behold a week or so ago I have had several Muslims sign up as Followers to mywww.scribd.com/amgroup01 online webspace, which I use to post documents. The following being the most

prominent IKWAN Scope, "The Largest Muslim Brotherhood's Scope on the Web":

http://ikhwanscope.net/main/

There have also been several Muslim individuals who signed up as followers around the same time, a weekor so ago. They have also signed up as followers on my www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone webspace.

You must understand, I am a VERY Patriotic Person and live a very patriotic life - I believe in the

U.S. Constitution and Our Founding Father's vision for America; I support Our Military and ourTroops; I believe in the Rule of Law; I am a Practicing Catholic, and have been my whole life; I

Believe in the TRUTH; I believe in Right v. Wrong; Good v. Evil; and finally I believe in God. Whatdo you believe in?”

Posted on the Yahoo Fulton Bank Stock Message Board, January 7, 2010

Date Updated: October 10, 2015

Date Completed: July 28, 2009

Date Initiated: July 8, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

Page 2 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 61 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 63 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 64: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

UDATE OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2015

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local,

state, and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture,

trespass, thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary

Psychiatric Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J.

Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and

rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The

psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By

the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and

coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the “Attacks” and “Torture” from the

employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.

Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking

Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in

an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the

Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state

and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White

House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and

Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.

Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,

2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer

hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus

Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul

Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to

be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling

evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct

witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle

Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter

Police Department engaged in a strategy of “Entrapment” that lead to the unfortunate

murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the

Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-

3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free

Page 3 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 62 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 64 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 65: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary

Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated

Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in

the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no

MANDATORY Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a

desperate attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in

the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far

as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions

of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of

$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,

Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained

allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert

case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the

fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on

August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey

Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of

Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing

Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the

U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County

community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The

community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.

John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the

Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

Page 4 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 63 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 65 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 66: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45

audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to

1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and

Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.

Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of

Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National

Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to

find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living

descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am

alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and

provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

Page 5 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 64 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 66 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 67: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

HISTORY

In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal

and Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United

Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since

1983 of ISC, Stan J. Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which

resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company,

Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public

allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials

and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations including the

selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. However, money, power,

influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal False Claims

Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a total blockade of

all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal, state, and

local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;

personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most

valuable asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-

Work under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad

investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This

includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a

Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies

since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National

Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade, Maryland.

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL

SIGNAL & CONTROL OR ISC:

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with

over 5,000 employees.

James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable

organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United

States as of 1992.

Page 6 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 65 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 67 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 68: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:

George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA).

Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current

Secretary of Defense.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and

currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.

Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of

Directors?

Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the

Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con

scandal.

Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms

merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle EasternCountries under U.S. sanctions.

ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.

Patent Office.

In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great

Britain, Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's

subsidiaries.

ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel

regarding the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraqstory and lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert

Gates was involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.

ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam

Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I,with the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by

Carlos Cardoen.

On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster

Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal &Control (ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph

Roda did absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would notbelieve him.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal

counsel, and never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James

Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank,Lancaster, County.

Page 7 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 66 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 68 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 69: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented JamesGuerin. In 2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police

Department (05-cv-2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,.

In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),

Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007

Joseph Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S.Special Prosecutor Fitzpatrick.

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger

negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption;

burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender

liability torts; false arrests; false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had

to be covered up and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being

uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury

investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has closed or not. All of these

activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and organization of the perpetrators. The

pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over

time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order

to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way

possible.

Fabricate a history of mental illness.

Fabricate a criminal record.

Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.

Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.

Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.

Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family

into a life of solitaire.

Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of

action through money, favors, etc.,

Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community

away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.

When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort

any monies and/or possessions of value.

Page 8 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 67 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 69 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 70: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues

from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least

twenty attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of

specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited

and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are

now globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted

these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved

such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or

their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and

the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be

influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in

nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant

representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-

2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.

Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of

Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security

of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May

16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal.

One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,

Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under

the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet

another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking

with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total

Mind Control.

Page 9 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 68 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 70 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 71: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND

WEAPONS.

Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud

within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to

suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or

"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and

never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of

Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie

Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was

the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the

topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way

without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental

telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices

and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim.

This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action

in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This

assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The

main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is

connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of

Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person

without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of

Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for

more information.

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into

mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program

labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.

Page 10 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 69 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 71 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 72: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

FAMILY HISTORY

If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,

Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes something like

the following:

Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family

because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning

business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and

Space Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke

and with a severe mental illness.

Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has his

father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in California.

Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as

his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and

finally committed suicide at an early age.

Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and

had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services

industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue

everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is

against him. He always spends all of his money during his fits of mania and

has delusions about his success as a businessman.

The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,

father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began

during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel Caterbone,

Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is

most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA

or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions

with both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of documents that

were preserved in their estate, including service records; letters; official court papers; high school

documents; and the like - all will prove that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's

subprograms.

Page 11 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 70 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 72 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 73: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:

Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and

graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida. He was an exceptional

student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as well

as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a

successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the

solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,

owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to me, he was

definitely a remote viewer or data miner for some U.S. Agency with telepathic abilities. His

viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from organized

stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the 1960's, he was a

world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a

covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history

laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of

MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the Lancaster City

Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P.

Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking

account. The one check to Joe the Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never

entered into evidence, it was for a total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster

Attorney James Coho for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his

only criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President

Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone

wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the

County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own

corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial

Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien to learn more

on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and documentation to know that his

life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised

from family and friends, and of course a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of

his record online. On or about May 18, 2001 Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an

inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone) estate. The check was for some $70,000.00.

The estate was probated in November of 2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend

of 2001, he had called me to come to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect

health until this time. In a matter of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per

Julianne McKinney, former intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S.

Sponsored Mind Control, the weapons are lethal enough to kill and “the one thing that I worry

Page 12 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 71 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 73 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 74: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

about is that of dying of cancer” (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was

a murder, not natural.

Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968 to 1970.

In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel

A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of

October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the subject matter,

with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January 14, 1992. By his own

admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD"

trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others

questioned the classification of suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately

responsible for his death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara

Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than

suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending

Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an

unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in

Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the

Lancaster General Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The

hunting accident interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia

diagnosis was a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.

Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank that set

a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic

Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996.

Fulton Bank was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and

lead to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and

Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288.

FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this

day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an

exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and Marshall College, the

Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey

and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P. Caterbone had a very successful lawn and

landscaping business before joining forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and

selling residential mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by

James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike,

Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars

of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith

Page 13 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 72 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 74 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 75: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High

School.

Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer (at least one way in), is telepathic, and a

federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his adversaries

and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he has endured and

will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his claims, and progress his

legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state court system appearing pro se,

without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most

likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster

Catholic High School, in both football and track. Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B

grade in his four years of high school and had an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in

computer technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975, while in high school and

continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a degree in business

administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at building his companies, first

beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power

Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the

years, despite the illegal seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of

impressive real estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they

were sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a

$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,

despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.

The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a

close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in

very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and

Record:

One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word

used by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated

with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word

"delusional". And they still exist to this very day.

Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August

10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?), 2005

by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the 302

Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.

The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false

arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on summary

appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone appearing as

Page 14 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 73 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 75 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 76: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE

v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania.

THE PUBLIC RECORD

The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S. Federal Courts;

Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. In all some 40,000

pages of documents are now filed and electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary

offices. In addition in both the U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common

Pleas there are more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and

several video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an

exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as

plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in federal, state, and local

courts.

There are also Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare

and Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County

Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records; Lancaster Catholic High

School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his

court filings.

For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force service

records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; Social

Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian and Public Defender records;

and papers and documents persevered from his estate.

For Samuel P. Caterbone, my father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster

Catholic High School transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County

Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment

records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and Mortgages;

Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and of course papers and

documents persevered from his estate

PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF INTEREST:

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.freedomffchs.com

https://www.scribd.com

Page 15 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 74 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 76 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 77: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW

** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing has recently

been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500 companies are

using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market forecasts. This is

often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S. Department of Defense.

Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological advancements can stay

secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC story of the Television

drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had recorded an AM radio live

broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was one of the leading Physicist

turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this same notion.

Dated: July 28, 2009

Stan J. CaterboneAdvanced Media Group

[email protected]

The following are no longer in service:www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://ww w.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Page 16 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 75 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 77 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 78: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

September 7, 2009

Stan J. Caterbone

Advance Media Group1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603

Derrick RobinsonFreedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance

P.O. Box 9022Cincinnati, Ohio 45209

Phone 1-800-571-5618Fax 1-866-433-4170

email: [email protected]

Re: Is County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking andCovert Surveillance?

Derrick,

My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our new Lancaster Convention Center

Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like tosend your way. I thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a conference,

unless you think the exposure would be harmful.

I believe that they try new models for harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on mehere in Lancaster. Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in the

country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and monitor 165 cameras acrossLancaster City — making Lancaster the most watched city of its size in the nation." See article

attached, Watching you: City to add 105 more cameras.

I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the models of organized stalking andharassment that we TI's experience and wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some

history on the Lancaster Convention Center. Dale High of High Industries is the lead partner in ournew convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way. Now in the late 1980's I was a joint

venture partner with Dale High in American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group.American Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media Group was the

CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful of CD-ROM manufacturers in thedomestic United States back then. Also in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the

Eden Resort Inn, for trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention Center,see attached.

Now, some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. Back in the 1980's there were

several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being International Signal & Control,which I, of course, blew the whistle on a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.

Click here for an overview of ISC.

Click here to see t he Lancaster Newspapers Archives regarding International Signal & Control, or

ISC.

Click here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the eveningof the ISC indic tments. The U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press

Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the indictments and $ BillionDollar Fraud.

Page 17 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 76 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 78 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 79: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Click here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.

Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been predominately Republican. Lancaster is one ofthe oldest cities in the country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster

has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the George W.Bush administrationhas a close and very "interesting relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with

ISC, and of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with International Signal &Control, or ISC. The following are some transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline

regarding ISC and Arms to Iraq and the intelligence community. The transcripts are contained inmy Amicus for Case No. 2006-cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the United States Defense Department, and his

relationship to Lancaster. First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of RobertGates' confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00 you will see the back and forthquestions from Senator Murkowski to Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members

of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged involvement with ISCand the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa

and on to Iraq. Of course, he denied all of the allegations.

Robert Gates also has relatives that live in Lancaster County, if fact he attended a wedding here afew months ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem Township,

Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim Township.

Now, I'll give you the ABC News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA,National Security Agency:

"It all started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National Security Agency, a super-

secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help complete project X, a chain of electronic listeningposts based at South Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to

follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure secrecy, ISC and the NSAmade sure shipments could not be tracked back to them. They created a company called Gamma

Systems Associates. In fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert operation was stopped in

1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firmsto stop any military-related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics, some

civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's, South Africa began to intensify itsefforts at ballistic missile development. For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its

top executives was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has been thefather of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary contacts in the nations defense

structure. Begining in 1984, federal investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, beganregular contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of the May 23,

1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast.

Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA. "He served in this role for 357 days, fromJanuary 30, 1976 to January 20, 1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations,

including those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee regarding illegaland unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the

agency's morale.[23] In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to JimmyCarter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of

remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but it was not to be," according toWikipedia.

Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency (NSA),

former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Controlindustry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:

Page 18 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 77 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 79 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 80: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via

their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big timedefense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense contractor.

Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others."by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman

requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his criticsspeculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a

member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent orapproved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).

Now, lets list the former Navy personnel:

George H. Bush, former President of the United States, former Director of CIA.

James Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal & Control.

Bobby Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Director of

International Signal & Control, (ISC).

My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.

His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.

George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing assumed or alleged).

George W. Bush flew with the Navy.

James Cross

I will Finish later and add more.

Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at least 1992. His name was JosephTate, of Philadelpha. This link will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin

and Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated everything back in1987. The document contains a letter of September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick

Fitzgerald regarding Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff. the letterinvolves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame

and eventually outing her.

Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents from The Defense IntelligenceAgency. I was merely visiting a Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and

airplanes. near where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my way toCalifornia. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the Department of Defense Defense

Intelligence Agency escorted me outside to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making meconfirm that I was visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my brother's

Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. The reviewed my court documents forCATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The demanded that I stay off all military basesbefore releasing me.

In 2006 I was telepathic with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me

at the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster for a trainingexercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High Group for space at the Greenfield

Industrial Park. He said he was retiring and that our discussions were keeping him a few weekslonger than expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake Bay Area.

We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a fan. I turned him on to her newalbum, Wildflower, and he said she liked it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed

by other telepathic assailants.My former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was controller and was

hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in 1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare,who grew up just some 10 or so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon

after I hired her in 1994 or 1995.

I will finish later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-progress.

Page 19 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 78 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 80 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 81: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.comwww.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbonewww.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Page 20 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 79 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 81 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 82: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

AFFIDAVIT

BE IT ACKNOWLEDGED, that Stanley J. Caterbone, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,

FMG Advisory, and and all affiliates, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group, Advanced

Media Group, Ltd., Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., Power Productions I, Radio Science

Laboratories, Ltd., of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, the undersigned deponent, being of legal

age, does hereby depose and say under oath as follows:

I am now convinced that the situation surrounding my litigation and all factors attributed

to my financial and professional demise bore out of the fact that my Father, Samuel P. Caterbone

was a victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, in the truest sense of the words. The

whistleblowing activities of 1987 either were a coincidence or I was set up in the very beginning

by Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong (former stock broker) in 1983 when he solicited

me to purchase the ISC stock. The preceding would have been the perfect cover story for my

demise; that I was involved in a fraud. Following this analysis would lead one to conclude that

the collateral damage from the activities of my financial ruin always left my fellow businesses in

financial ruin, for example Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett, partners, and the shareholders

and affiliated professionals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., Tony Bongiovi and Power Station

Studios, Jim and Lynn Cross as Cross Microwave Consultants, Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and

James Boyer as American Helix/High Industries, Ralph Mazzochi and Gallo Rosa Restaurant;

Pflumm Contractors, Inc., Mike Caterbone's AIM Wholesaler's Business, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, D.O.

And associated Primary Care Practices of Austin, Texas, Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzochi as

S.N. Lombardo Associates for Lancaster Avenue Project, Sheryl Crow Singer Songwriter, my

immediate family, friends, and relatives.

Following this analysis would lead one to concur that the legal and financial remedies

would only be reconciled by the above named parties enjoining my civil litigation. This AFFIDAVIT

is to be considered a legal and binding document to accomplish that remedy.

Page 21 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 80 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 82 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 83: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 81 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 83 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 84: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 82 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 84 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 85: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 83 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 85 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 86: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

s [email protected]

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

www.scribd.com/amgroup01

www.facebook.com/scaterbone

www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone

www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone

http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPViolations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination

and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities

September 27, 2015

Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy – Issue a few every

year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to

isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from

defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong

Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The

Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of

entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during

the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm

2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.

3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing

Fulton Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail

4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,

Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley

Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City

Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.

6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,

and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006

7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice

8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael

Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.

9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John

Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice

10.Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice

11.Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in

March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail

12.Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice

13.Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by

Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

Page 25 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 84 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 86 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 87: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

14.TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15.Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No

Formal Notice

16.Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police

Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice

17.O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.

18.Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security

Officer.

19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason

was for complaining of harassment and stalking.

20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police

Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,

Debra Hoeckler

21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,

with no reason and no written notice.

22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and

was told by bartender to leave and not come back.

23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me

communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288

for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.

24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain

regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

Dated: September 27, 2015

Page 26 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 85 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 87 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 88: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 27 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 86 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 88 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 89: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 28 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 87 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 89 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 90: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 29 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 88 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 90 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 91: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

����������

�� ������ ������ ���� ����� ���������������������������� �������� ������ ��

�!" ���# ��"��������$%�&�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �!��������������������������� ���"�#�����������$���������������������������������������������������������%����������������������

����������� �������� ���� ���������� ������ ��� ��� "&#� ��� ��'����� �� ������� ������� ���$���������������������������������������������������(����������������������������%��������������������������������������������������� ��� '��� (�� ��� �� �"� � ")��"��� � *��� )�� !���� �"� !��+ �"� *���� � � �"� ,�

!�� ���� ,�""�� ��� ��� ���� ��� ��� !�" � ��!��"� �� !����� "��!�� � ,����,�

�����+ �� "�-���� ��� � �� � � !����!� ���� �� )���� �������� ��������� ��������� �����

������� �����������*�������� ������� ���� �� ����������������� ��� �������� ���������������������� � �� ���%� ���� ��������� ��������� ��� ��� ����������(��������� ������� *�������� ����������������� ���� ������� ��� ���������� ������������� �������� ����� ���(����� ��������� ��� ���� �����

�������������������������������������������%�������������������������������������������������������������� ����� ����� � � !������������ �������������������������� �������� �����.�� �/"0�������!��� ������ �������� ����, �*����1������!���+���2"3��

� � 4��- ���� ��� �1 ������ ��� "����������"� 1�,� � !����� �!� � ������4��������� ��� ����� 1�,� � �������� � !����!� ��� ����� ���)������ ** !"��

��� ! ��5� ����6 )��"���"����� � � �#�����4�������4������+��������������&,,-������������������������������������.�������.����$������/�������������������������..$/���� &,,0�� ��� �� ������ �� �������� ������ ��� �������� ������ ������ ����� ���� ����� �������� ����� ����

�����%�������������������������������������%���������1��������2����1�����������������������������������������������������������%������������������������������������������������ ���������� ��� �������� ������������� ����� &,,� � � � 3����� ��� &,,�� ���� �����%�� ������4���������������������������������������������������������������������%�� ����������������

�����%�������������������������������������������������������������������� ��

& � ����������� ,���,"� ��� � �� � " �"���� !,������ " � �5������������������������� ���00�� ��������� ���� ����������������� ��6������� �������������� ����������������

���������������7�����������������8�����������������������������������9��������������������������%����������� ��

: � 7-����� �� �����8, �9��, �"2����! "�,����,�, ���!��1� �, ����� ** !��

���, �!� ��:���7 ��� � � ),���.�����������������4�����������������;�������������������

��&,,-����������(�����&<;=������������������������������������� ��5�������(����������������������� ������� ��������� ������������ ������ �������� ������ ��� �� ����� ������� ��������� ������>����� ������� ��$;$���?������ � �$������������� ����� ��������� ��������������� ����

�������������������������� ��!�����������%��������������%�������4������������������� �1����&,,@����&,,=��������������������������������,������������������������������������������������������� ��$��������������������������������>���������������������������������������������������� ������������������������������������������������������������������������������

��������������������� ��A�����������������������1�B3�������.+������� � �����������������������&,,= �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1�B3������������������������������������������������� ��2������������������������ ��� �� �� ������ ������ ��� ���>���� ������� ���� ����������� ��� ��������� � � ����������� �����

����������������������������������������������������������������������������������%��������������������� �

Page 30 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 89 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 91 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 92: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

< � � )�������� � �*� "� )� �� � �� � �������!�� �� �� ������A������ 24���������������1����������!����'���������������������������&,,�����&,�, ��A����������������%��������������

1�������� 2����5������ ������%�� ��%�� ����� "����#9� ��������� ���� ������������9� �������������������������������� ��

- � ������!����)��"����"��"���� ������� �;��"� �������,�� �� ��.������4�����������4��������"$���������C#�����������������&,,@(&,,= ��A���������������������D��������$����

3������ 1��������� ��� ���� �������� B������ 3����� � � 24��������� �����%�� ����� ������ ������������������������ ���������������� �������� � �5��� �������� ����������� ��������� ��������������������� ������� ���� ����� ��� ������ ��� � � !�� ������� �����%�� ����� ������ �� �������� ��� ���

���% � ��&,,0��4��������������%���������� ����������������������������������%�������������������� ��!��%�3�����������������������%� ��

@ � <������ �"�- �� ���"" ����*���������� ,�!� "�������+�������,�� ���:���

!��� � *�� ����%�� ��� E������� ����%�� ���� �� �0�=� ��� �������� ����� � � ��� ��������

�������� ���� �������� ����� ��� ����� ����� ���9� �������� ������ ��� ���������9� ��� ������������ � �$������������������ ������ ���0�=9��00&9�00�����&,,-����&,�, �$������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��!���������

������������%���������%������������������������� ����������������������������������� �!��� �������� ����%�� ��� ���������� ��������� �� �������� �������� ����� ������ �������� �����D���������3������������$�������� ��!���%�����������������������������������������%���������������������� ��3�������������������������������� ��

= � �))����/4������0����),�� "���$����������������������;���������������������F���G������+�������0�=�����������������������������/�������F���G�������������%�������������� ��!���������������������+�����������������������$��������3������������00� ���&,,<���

��������� ����� �� ������� ������ ���� ������ ����� ���� 3��������� �������� *������ E������ ��3���������� 3��������� "���� ���� H����%#� ������� ����������� ����� ����� ������ ��������������������������������������������������� ��$��������/��%��������������������������������������������������$��������D���������������$�����$����������������.�������+���������

�������������&,,-����&,�, ��

� � 4�!-��"����� ����, ��������- ��.������������������������������������������������� 3��������� �������� *������ �� &,,@� ��� ���� D�������� $����� /���� B��������$�����������&,,� ��

0 � 6��-)�! � ��������� 24��������� �� �0�=� ��� .������� A������� *������ D�� ���������� /���4� ��� /��� ���������� �� �00�� ��� 3������ $����������� �� �� �� �00=;�00� � � .�������������������������������������������������� ��5���������������������:�����������������

�������������������������������� ��

�, � #����!� 7�������� � 3������ ����� ������ ��� �������� ����%�� ��� ���������� ���������������� �������� �� ���� ������ &,,-� ��� &,�,� �� ���� �������� ������ � � !��� D�������� $�����

$�����������!���D��������$�����3������D������������3���������$������D�%���������A����������������������D��������������������E������ ���������������������������������7F��!�������8�F���������������������������������D��������$�����������������&,,-����&,,0���������>��������� �������������������� ����%������������� �������������� ������������������� � �!���D��������$�����

3������D��������������A�������������������������%�������������������������������������������������������������� ������������;������%��� ��������� � � .�����+�%� ���%��������� ���������������4 ��E������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ ��$���������������������������������������������������������������������������� �

Page 31 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 90 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 92 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 93: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

�� � � �) �� 7��� ��� � 24��������� ����� �� �������� ��� ���������� ��������� �� �00�� ������F�������F����A����������������$;$��(F��������������7�����������8 ���!��������������������

�������� ����� ����� ��� ��������� ��� ������ ��������� ������� ��� �� ���� ���� �������������������������������������������������� ����.�������������������������������������������������������������������������� �,-(&&�����&,,-��������������������1��������$��������� ����2������1�����������3�������� ��

�& � # � =�������� � $��� ���� %������ �� &,,-� ����� ���������� ��� ���� D�������� $����� /����������������������������B������3������1�������� ��

�: � ��� ��� 5��� "� �*� <�� :#��) �� "�� �.����� ���0�=� �������/�������F���G������� �����������00�9��00=(�00�9�������������������&,,-����&,�, ��.�����3������B������������������������������������ ������������B������ 3������1��������� ��� $�������� 3��������� �� ������.�������/��������������������$������� ��

�< � ��� ��� > )�"" ""���"�� � �������� �� �0�=� ������� ����� ��� �������� ����� �/���;3�����������$��������&,,@���������������������������������������������� ����

�- � #,�"�!���""��"��E�������%����������������������������������������D���E����$�����������&,,-�������������$�������D������� ��3�������������������������������������������� ��

�@ � ��" � ��� ""�� 24��������� =� �� �0�=� ��� ����� ���� &,� �� &,,-� ��� &,,@� �� ����$��������������3���������D��������$�����$��������$�����3���� ��!�������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��

�= � ��" � ��)��"��� �"�� �����=� ����,������ �� D��������$�����3����� ���0�=�������������������������������������������@,��������&,,@�������������������������� �!���@,�1������������������ ��� &,,@� ���� ������������� �� ������ ������� ��������� �� ����� ��������������������������������������������������������9��������������������������������������������������������

����������������������������� ��!��������������������������������������������������������������������@,������������������������� ��!����������������������������������������������� ��

�� � #"�!,���!����" "�1�,���" ����!�� ���� ����"�*����# �) ���":��- �"��E���� �0�=� �������� �� �� ������� ��������������� ���� �������� ������ ��� ������� �� ����� /������� F���

G����� � � ��� ��� ���� �� .�������� ��� &,,-� �������� �� ������� ������������ ���������� ����������� ���!������������������������������������������������������������ ��!�����������B������3����������������������������������������������������������� ��

�0 � �����"�� ��#��) ����.��������0�=��������/�������F���G������������������00�9��00=(�00�9�������������������&,,-����&,�, ��.�����3������B������������������������������������ ���� �������� B������ 3������ 1��������� ��� $�������� 3��������� � ��� /��������������������$����� �:� ������������������� �������� ���������������&,,-������������������

������������'������9��������������9��������9����������������9����������9���� ���A�������������������������������� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������%������������������������������������������ ����������������������������������

����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��

&, � ("� ��,����� �!������������������������������������������������������������������� ��� ��� ����� ����� � � .����� ��������� �� �00�� ��� ���� $������� 3������ ��� �������� ��������� ��$������������������������������������ ��!��������7��������8������������������

&,�,��������������������������������������������������������������������� �!��������������������� ���� �������� ����� ����� ��� �� ������������� �������� ������� ��� ����� ��� ��� ��� �������� ����� ��F����������������������������������������&,,�����&,�, �

Page 32 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 91 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 93 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 94: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

&� � �, *"��*�#��) ����F���)���$�����������

&& � �����"������:���!-�� ������&,,-�������4�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������%��� ��A��������������������������D��������$����3������1�������� ��

&: � ��;�!��, ��!����"����>�������?�" �� �24��������������������������&,,0�������������������� ��5����������>���������������;������������ ��B�����������������������������������

��������������%� ��

&< � ���)� �� <!-����� �$��������/��%����������������� ������ ��� ������������������ �� ����$��������D���������������$�����$����������������.�������+����������������������&,,-����

&,�, ��F���������������������������������������� ��$�������������������������%����������������������&,�, ��5���������������������������������%������������������%�����(��� �2��������� ���������� ������ ���������� ��� �������� �������� ����� ����� ���%��� ������ ������������������������������������������������������������������ ��

&- � ��� �� ��-����� � A���� �� &,,-� ��� &,�, � � $��������� ��� A��������� ����� �������� )�����A������+�������������.+��$�����$�������� ��

&@ � �� �* � �! :� ��:�, *� �*� @���� 7��"�� .����� ��������� ��� � � � 3���������� ��� ���������������� ������� �������� �������� ���0�= � � ��&,,�� ���&,,0����������� ����������������������� ��� ���� � � � 3���������� ��������� *������ ���� ������ ��� ����� ���� ����������� ������������������������������������������������������������������������ ��

&= � 5� !����� �!� 6 )��"� ��"���� � � � � 7�"!� � �)"�":���)"�� � .������4�����������&,,@���������� ��E���4����������&,,@��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������"������������������������������������������������������������������������#������������������������������������������������������ ��

&� � 5� !����� �!�6 )��"���"����� ;��������������.������4�����������&,,- ��

&0 � ���! ��<�")���+���"���.������/������������������0�=�"&#��������@�����������������-�����9�&,,@��������:�����9�&,,0���������������������������� �� ������������� ������������

������9����&,�,�������������� ��.������������������$�������$�������������/����B��������00�����&,,� ����

:, � 7��)������ ����, *� �*���!�� �"��F������������������������������������ �������� �������� ��������� ����� �� ������ ��� �� ���������� ������� ����� ��������� ����� �0�= ��

A���������;A���������� ���� �� �0�=� ��� ������ ��������� ��� ������� ��������� ����� ����������������� ��F����������������������������������������������������������0�= ��� �

Page 33 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 92 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 94 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 95: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

� � �3� � �������������!������� �����������!������6������������0�= � ���0�=� ������� ������������"��������������������$���������������������.����������������������.�����������������

���������� ����� +������� 1������ $��������� .������� ����������#� �� �� ����������� ��������������������������������������I�$������������$���������������������"2�������������!��������������������$�������+����#���� ���'���������������������������������������J��+������������� .����� �� �00&� ��� ���� ������ ������� �������� ��� �������� ������ �������� ������ � � ����

�+$;F����&,;&,����F����������00� �!�����������������������'������������������������� D��������� 3�������� � �� ���� �� ������������ ��� ���� ���������� ��� �� ���� ��$� 24���������"$�������������A������������ ����+������1������.����#��������� �������������� ������������������������������������������������$����$� �����$�������1������������1������"1E1#�$���������

������������������������������ ���������������������� ��K�������� �� �����������0=,K� ��E����� ��K�� �������������������3��>����L����������F������������������������F������.� �A������A������ ��.�����������������������F�����+�����B�����������������+��������1��������������$�

������������������+��������1������������������������������������������$�����������������$ �����$���������������������������������������������������������1�������������������������1���� ������� �� B������ 6������ ������ ���$� ����� 3��>���� ������� � � ��� ���� ��������� �����+����� B��� ���� �������� ���� �������� ���� ���������� ��� 1������ ����� ���� ������ $�����

������������������������������$����!������������� ����������������00,K������������������������� �� ���>���� ���� ���� 1������ �������� B�������� 3��>���� ������ ��� 1�B3��� ����� ���� F���������������� ��� ��������� ��� !��������� ��� F��!� ������� !�A�! � � � � !��� ���>���� ���������� �������

�������������������������������������������������������������������� �����������������������������������������1������������1���������������������������������������������� �����00������������%���������������������������������� ����F�������������������������F��� ��)��%��3�����������������������������������������������F������������7������������8 � � � ��

&,,-������������������&�1�������������������������1����������������������������������������� �� ������� !�4��� ��� ���� '��������� ��� ����������� ������� ��� ������ ������� ������ ���������� ������ ���� �������� ����� � � �� ���� ��������� ��� ����� ��� ����� ���� ��� ���� ��������� ����� � � A�������������.������3����������������!�4�������������������������������������������������������

���������������������������������� ��� A�� ������� ������� ������� ����� ��� � � � F���� �4��������� �� ���� �0<,K�� ��� �4���������

��������������������������0=,K����0�,K������00,K������������������������������������������������9����������������������������������������������������������� �A� �����.������������1���������� 3��>���� ��������� ����� ��� ���� ����� ��%���� ���� �� 2!� �4�������� ���� ������������������ ��/���������&,,����F���)��%�$������������ ��A��������������������� � �����.�����������

����� �0@,K�� ��� �� ������ ���� �� ������� ��� ���� D�1� �4��������� ������� ���A?�D!B�� �� ���� ������0@,K������������������������"����������������������������������������������#��������+�������$������������0�<9��F���������$���������������������������$�����������������*���������00� �/��

��������������������������������������������������������������7����D�18�������������� � �����.���� ��� E�����������%����������������������0�=���������������������������������������

��������$ ������������%��������������0�,K����������������������������������������M���������������M � 1���� ���� ������ ����� ����� $������ ��� ��������� ����� ���������� �� �0�=�� �00��� ����00=� E������� ����%�� ��� /��������� ��� ������ ������ ��� �����%�� �4��������� ��� !���������������������������������������� ����&,,-������ � ������������������������������������(

���� �������� ��� ������ ���������9� ��������� ���������9� ��� ���� ��� �������� ������� ���� ���� ���������������������������;����������������������� ��!���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� � �1��������$���������$�!2B+EF2�� �

D��������$�����3�������� ��� �����,-(��(&&�� ����� !�������������������������������������������� �

Page 34 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 93 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 95 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 96: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

��� �# �") !�� "�7!��������������������������������������������������N������������������������������(������� ������ �����������O� �������� ����� ���� �������� ��� �� ����� O� ���� �������� ��� ������������ �����N�������� ���������� � ��� �������� ���� �� ��������� ����� ������� ��� ��� ���� ����������� ���

���� �.����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ��!����������������������������������������������������������������������� ��5��������������������������������������������4����(������������F����������������������� �5����������������������������������������������(

��������� ���������� ������ ����������� ������� ���������� ������������� ���� ���� ����������� �������������������������������������G���������A��������������������������� 8� A'��, �? ��*���? 1���� ����*������"�"��*�#"�!,�"�"� ���, � ��,��*�7�������"�� �

� !,������A������� ����,�

(�����> " �!,��'!�� ���B�����$C���������*�#"�!,�D��!������� "�����&���

�73�����������������������������������������������������"��������������������������������

��������������������������#��������������������������������������������������������(���K��������������������������������;�������������������� ��2���������������������������������������������������� ��.�������������������������������������������������������������

���������"��������������#�(���������������K����������������������������������������������� ��!��������������� ������ ��� ���� �������� �� ��������� ��� �������� ���� ���������� ����� �����������������������;������������������������������������������ ��5��������������������������������������������� ���� 7�������� !���8� ��� �� ������ ��� �������9� �������9� ���������9� ����������9�

�����9��������9��������������� ���� ���%���� ��������� ���������������������� �������������������� ��!��������������%�������������������������������������������������������������������(��������������� ��� ���%�� �������������� ������ ���� ���� �������� ������� � � ������ ��������'����������������������������������������������������������� ��5�����������������������������������

����%������������������������������������������������������������������������ ��!�����������������7A����������8�!������������$������������������'������������O���������7D�.2����(����8�!�������8 �����*�������������������������������������������������������������������

��������������O���������������������������������������������������������������������������������%�8 ������� ���� �

'����+ �����(�����-����

7�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������(������������������������������� ���������������������������'�����������%�����������������(

�������� ���������������� ���������������������������������� ��� ����������� ������������� ���������� �����%�� ���������� ��� ���������������� ����� ���� ���� ���������� ��� ����� �������� ��� �������������������������������� �������������������������������������������������� �

!��������������������%����������������������������������������������%������������������������%�������������������������������������������������� �������������4����������������������%����� ��������������������������������������������������������������������������K���������������������������������� ������������ ������������������ ���� ������ ��������������� �� ��������

�������� ���� �����K�� ���������� ������� M�����M� �� ������� ����� ���� ������� ���� M�%���M� �� ��������������������������������������������������������%�����������������������������������(��������������������������������������������������K������������ 8

'����+ ����-����6 �"� �

� ��7E�����������%�� ����� �������� ����������������������� ���������� ���������������������� ��������������'�����������������N�� ����������������� �������������������%(������������ �������(

������ ����������������� �4�������� �������������� ���������� ��� ��������� ����� ������� ����(��������;����������������� �!�������������������(��������������������������������������������������������� �������� �������� ������������ ������ ��� ������� ��������� ���������� �������� ����(

������������������������������������������������������������ ���������7�����8�������(������������������������������������������������������������������������7���������8��������������� 8�7�-�7��>�!,

Page 35 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 94 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 96 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 97: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

!������������������������������������������������������������������� ���� ��*�, " ��1"�

��!��� ����� �������� ����, �*����1���3����@���E�������!� �����DD� �! ������1����*���))��)������

���@���E��������!� �����DD���-����

�B��&.��@���DD������ �

�B�@����.��DD����")��!�����"����,"��*�"�� � �����*� ��(���!� ���")�������"����

� ���"�

�B�@�����&�DD���� ������� )����"� ����

�B�@����.��DD�� )��������*����,"���� ��!������*��1�

�B�@���&��DD���)��������!��� �����*�" ���*�������

�B�@������$�DD����")��!����7��� ��

�B�@��������DD�7��� ��

�B�@����E���DD���"!��"�� ��*���*�������� � �����

.��@����EB&�DD�������!����*���� )��������*����,"�

.��@����EB��DD����")��!������ �* � �1�,�!��������,"�

&��@����&�B�DD�6,�"� ���1 ��)�� !���"�

�B�@��������DD�5������������"� �����!����!�

�B�@������&�DD������������1�� "":��!���

�B�@��������DD���) �����1�,��1�� "":��!���

�B�@������&�DD�> ���������"��1�� "":��!���

�B�@��������DD�'�"��!�����!���������� "�������!��*��!��*��� � "���� "����

��� ��� ��

�B�@������E�DD���) ������� � ; �!�" ��*����,"���� �)������)� � �����"��!��

��) � ������ �* � �1�,�"� �

�B�@����%���DD��������������*�) �F�������)��!��������, ����!�����) �F����

�"E������#����������������������������������PPPPPPP�"����%# ��

����>7���'?��

����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ����������������������������������������������������������������%�����������������4����������������������%����������������

��������������� ���������"�������#�PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F����"����# �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��1��� �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�����������PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�$��������PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

���������������������PPPPPPP��������PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��&,PP��PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP��F������3������24� �PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP�

������I����� ���.�������.����$������/���������I������������ ������������������� �$��������Q�&,�,�"!����������������

������������������������������������������&,�,�������.�������.����$������/���������I������������ #�

Stan J. CaterboneStan J. Caterbone

June 19, 2015

Pennsylvania

Lancaster

19 June 15

Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 Don't Know When

SJC

Page 36 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 95 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 97 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 98: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007

Page 37 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 96 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 98 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 99: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007

Page 38 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 97 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 99 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 100: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 39 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 98 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 100 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 101: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 40 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 99 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 101 Date Filed: 12/08/2015

Page 102: Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re in Forma Pauperis FRAUD by the Judiciary of the Lancaster County Courts, The U.S. District Court, And the PA Superior Court, December 8,

Page 41 of 41 Saturday, October 10, 2015

15-3400 Lambert Appeal Page 100 of 100 Tuesday, December 8, 2015Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112148606 Page: 102 Date Filed: 12/08/2015