Recenzentski postupak u

biomedicini

Prof. Srećko Gajović

Croatian Medical Journal

YOUR DOOR TO THE MAINSTREAM

MEDICAL SCIENCE

23 godine

Značajke

Croatian Medical Journal-a

CMJ is an

international,

peer-reviewed,

bimonthly,

Open Acces Journal

CMJ is published in

English

www.cmj.hr

CMJ is indexed in

PubMed/MEDLINE,

PubMed Central,

EMBASE/Excerpta

Medica, Current

Contents/Clinical

Medicine, and Web of

Science

Our impact factor is

1.373

www.cmj.hr

„author-helpful

policy”

www.cmj.hr

CMJ checks

regularly for

plagiarism by

specially

dedicated

software:

CrossCheck

www.cmj.hr

CMJ organisation

• Owners:

University Schools of Medicine from

Zagreb, Rijeka, Split and Osijek

4 Schools correspond to 4 strongest

Universities in Croatia (all that have

medical studies)

• Represented by Dean’s Conference

• Regulated through MoU among 4 partners

CMJ organisation

• Management Board:

8 members:

4 from Zagreb, 2 from Rijeka,

1 from Osijek, and 1 from Split

CMJ organisation

• Editorial Board:

8 members:

4 from Zagreb, 2 from Rijeka,

1 from Osijek, and 1 from Split

CMJ organisation

• Mangement Editors:

– 3 employees

• Publication Editor

• Language Editor

• Journal Secretary

– Flexible number of professional volounteers

• e.g. Manuscript Editors, Statistical Editors

CMJ organisation

• Publisher:

Medicinska naklada, Zagreb, Croatia

CMJ Diamond Open Access

includes

• No publication charges

• No manuscript charges

• Inclusion in major medical databases

• Free access directly from the databases

– e.g. PubMed,

NIH based database which is central for

medical publications

Recenzija u CMJ

• Obavezna

• Jednosmjerno slijepa

• Nema nekih specifičnih uputa

Recenzenti u CMJ

• Bar 2 recenzenta

• Statistička recenzija

Rezultati recenzije

• Veliki broj recenzenata ne odgovara na

poziv na recenziju

• Značajan broj recenzija nije koristan

• Iznimno teško je skupiti dovoljan broj

kvalitetnih recenzija u razumno kratkom

roku

Primjer recenzije

I have only minor comments:

1. Interesting paper.

2. The text is quite difficult to follow; however, the tables

show the findings nicely.

3. Some text structuring would help, perhaps.

4. Regarding the findings, have you collected information

on obesity? It seems possible that vitamin D deficiency

could be a consequence of higher BMI/waist

circumference in older patients with longer duration of

the disease.

O čemu ovisi prihvaćanje rada

za publikaciju?

ili

Koja recenzija je dobra?

• Novina u znanosti i struci

• Opravdan i dobro proveden dizajn pokusa

• Rezultati korektno obrađeni i prezentirani

na pravi način

• Stil rada pregledan i razumljiv, u skladu sa

zahtjevima časopisa

Primjer recenzije

I have only minor comments:

1. Interesting paper.

2. The text is quite difficult to follow; however, the tables

show the findings nicely.

3. Some text structuring would help, perhaps.

4. Regarding the findings, have you collected information

on obesity? It seems possible that vitamin D deficiency

could be a consequence of higher BMI/waist

circumference in older patients with longer duration of

the disease.

O čemu NE ovisi prihvaćanje

rada za publikaciju?

Ali ipak

Koja recenzija je dobra?

• Jasno opisati autorima što je nužno

popraviti

• Jasno dati razloge zašto rad ne

zadovoljava standarde pojedinog časopisa

• Pomoći autorima u budućnosti

Primjer recenzije

I have only minor comments:

1. Interesting paper.

2. The text is quite difficult to follow; however, the tables

show the findings nicely.

3. Some text structuring would help, perhaps.

4. Regarding the findings, have you collected information

on obesity? It seems possible that vitamin D deficiency

could be a consequence of higher BMI/waist

circumference in older patients with longer duration of

the disease.

Odgovor autora

• Po točkama

• Opisan u popratnom pismu (cover letter).

• Odnosi se na preinake u radu.

Kako nadopuniti sustav

recenzije?

• Trijaža

– Brza,

– Efikasna

– Bez jasne povratne informacije autorima

– Oko 2/3 radova odbija se u postupku trijaže

Zašto moramo nadopuniti

sustav recenzije?

• Copyediting

• Jezično uređivanje

• Produkcijsko uređivanje

• Probni otisak

Tko snosi konačnu

odgovornost?

• Recenzenti?

• Glavni urednik?

• Autori?

Klasični sustav recenzije ili

alternative?

• CMJ ostaje u klasičnom sustavu – do

daljnjega

• Neke alternative:

– Bez recenzije

– Post recenzije

Why CMJ will continue to be

Croatian Medical Journal?

Zbog recenzenata ☺

• Hrvatska medicinska zajednica zalog je

kvalitete Croatian Medical Journal-a

• Kako poboljšati recenzije u CMJ?

100 CMJ Key Reviewers

• Prepoznati najbolje recenzente

• Nagraditi ih javnim vrednovanjem njihovog

doprinosa

Budućnost recenzije

• Plaćeni rad

• Digitalne baze recenzenata

• Javne recenzije – javni sadržaj recenzije,

proces recenziranja i ime recenzenata (ali

samo za prihvaćene radove)

Quality of journal

• Only citations count – IF

• Only citations count – h-index

ButK

Quality of scientist

At the end

• Recenzija ima brojnih nedostataka no za

sada nema ozbiljne alternative