Recent PAMELA Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    1/47

    Recent PAMELA Results

    Mirko BoezioINFN Trieste, Italy

    On behalf of the PAMELA collaboration

    UCLA Dark Matter 2010

    February 24th

    2010

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    2/47

    Isotopic

    composition

    [ACE]

    Solar Modulation

    AntimatterDark Matter

    [BESS, PAMELA, AMS]

    ElementalComposition

    [CREAM, ATIC, TRACER, NUCLEON,CALET, ACCESS?, INCA?,

    Extreme Energy CR [AUGER, EUSO, TUS/KLYPVE, OWL??]

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    3/47

    Background:CR interaction with ISMCR + ISM p-bar +

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    4/47

    DM annihilationsDM particles are stable. They can annihilate in pairs.

    Primary annihilationchannels Decay Final states

    a= < v>

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    5/47

    PAMELAP ayload for Antimatter Matter Explorationand Light Nuclei Astrophysics

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    6/47

    PAMELA Collaboration

    MoscowSt. Petersburg

    Russia:

    Sweden:KTH, Stockholm

    Germany:Siegen

    Italy:Bari Florence Frascati TriesteNaples Rome CNR, Florence

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    7/47

    Resurs-DK1: multi-spectralimaging of earths surface PAMELA mounted inside apressurized container

    Lifetime >3 years (assisted, firsttime last February). Expected tillend 2011.

    Data transmitted to NTsOMZ,Moscow via high-speed radiodownlink. ~16 GB per day

    Quasi-polar and elliptical orbit(70.0 , 350 km - 600 km)

    Traverses the South AtlanticAnomaly

    Crosses the outer (electron) VanAllen belt at south pole

    Resurs-DK1Mass: 6.7 tonnesHeight: 7.4 mSolar array area: 36 m 2

    350 km

    610 km

    70 o

    PAMELA

    SAA

    ~90 mins

    Resurs-DK1 satellite + orbit

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    8/47

    Subcutoff particles

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    9/47

    Antiparticle Results

    Nature 458 (2009) 607,Astro-ph 0810.4995

    PRL 102, (2009) 051101,Astro-ph 0810.4994

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA DarkMatter 2010, 2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    10/47

    PAMELA detectors

    GF: 21.5 cm 2 srMass: 470 kgSize: 130x70x70 cm 3Power Budget: 360W

    Spectrometermicrostrip silicon tracking system + permanent magnetIt provides:

    - Magnetic rigidity R = pc/Ze- Charge sign- Charge value from dE/dx

    Time-Of-Flightplastic scintillators + PMT:- Trigger- Albedo rejection;- Mass identification up to 1GeV;

    - Charge identification fromdE/dX.

    Electromagnetic calorimeterW/Si sampling (16.3 X 0, 0.6 I)

    - Discrimination e+ / p, anti-p / e -(shower topology)

    - Direct E measurement for e-

    Neutron detector 3He tubes + polyethylene

    moderator:- High-energy e/h discrimination

    Main requirements high-sensitivity antiparticle identification and precise momentum measure+ -

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    11/47

    Flight data:0.169 GV electron

    Flight data:0.171 GV positron

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    12/47

    Flight data: 0.763 GeV/cantiproton annihilation

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    13/47

    Bending inspectrometer:sign of charge

    Ionisation energyloss (dE/dx):magnitude of charge

    Interactionpattern incalorimeter:electron-like orproton-like,electron energy

    Time-of-flight:trigger, albedorejection, massdetermination(up to 1 GeV)

    Positron(NB: p/e + ~10 3-4 )

    Antiproton(NB: e -/p ~ 10 2)

    Antiproton / positron identification

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    14/47

    e-

    p

    p

    Calorimeterselection

    Tracker Identification

    Protons (& spillover)

    Antiprotons

    Strong track requirements:MDR > 850 GV

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    15/47

    Antiproton to proton flux ratio

    Errors might beunderestimated,

    possible residualspillover-protoncontamination

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    16/47

    Antiproton Flux

    PAMELA

    Errorsunderestimated,possible residualspillover-protoncontamination

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    17/47

    p (non-int)

    e-

    e+p (non-int)

    Fraction of energy released along the calorimeter track (left, hit, right)

    p (int)

    p (int )

    Rigidity: 20-30 GV

    Positron selection with calorimeter

    LEFT HIT RIGHT

    strips

    p l a n e s

    0.6 R M

    for em showers90% of E containedin 1 R M

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    18/47

    Positron selection with calorimeter

    e-

    Fraction of charge released along thecalorimeter track (left, hit, right)

    p?e+?

    + Energy-momentum matchStarting point of shower

    Rigidity: 20-30 GV

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    19/47

    Positron to Electron Fraction

    In Nature article publisheddata acquired till February2008

    New data reduction: data

    till end of 2008. With sameapproach of Nature paper~30% increase in statisticsbetter understanding of systematics.

    Secondary productionMoskalenko & Strong 98

    Adriani et al, arXiv:1001.3522 [astro-ph.HE]

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    20/47

    Flight data: 51 GeV/cpositron

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    21/47

    Positron selection with calorimeter

    e-

    Fraction of charge released along thecalorimeter track (left, hit, right)

    p

    e+

    + Energy-momentum match Starting point of shower Longitudinal profile

    Rigidity: 20-30 GV

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    22/47

    Secondary productionMoskalenko & Strong 98

    PAMELA Positron Fraction

    But how reliableis this curve?

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    23/47

    Diffusion Halo Model

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    24/47

    Galactic H and He spectra

    proton

    He

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    25/47

    Proton Spectrum

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    26/47

    Helium Nuclei Spectrum

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    27/47

    Secondary nuclei

    B nuclei of secondary origin:CNO + ISM B +

    Local secondary/primary ratio sensitive toaverage amount of traversed matter (l esc)from the source to the solar system

    Local secondary abundance: study of galactic CR propagation

    (B/C used for tuning of propagation models)

    SPescP

    S NN

    LBM

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    28/47

    Antiprotons

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA DarkMatter 2010, 2010/02/24

    Errors might beunderestimated,possible residualspillover-protoncontamination

    Antiprotons in

    CRs are inagreement withsecondaryproduction

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    29/47

    Positrons detectionWhere do positrons come from?

    Mostly locally within 1 Kpc, due to the energy losses bySynchrotron Radiation and Inverse Compton

    Typical lifetime

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    30/47

    Secondary productionMoskalenko & Strong 98

    PAMELA Positron Fraction

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    31/47

    M. Cirelli et al., Nucl.Phys. B 813 (2009) 1;arXiv: 0809.2409v3 Interpretation: DM

    Which DM spectra can fit the data?

    DM with and dominantannihilation channel ( possible candidate: Wino )

    positrons antiprotons

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    32/47

    Interpretation: DMWhich DM spectra can fit the data?DM with and dominant

    annihilation channel ( no natural SUSY candidate )positrons antiprotons

    But B 10 4

    M. Cirelli et al., Nucl.Phys. B 813 (2009) 1;arXiv: 0809.2409v3

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    33/47

    Interpretation: DM

    DM with and dominantannihilation channel

    positronsantiprotons

    M. Cirelli et al., Nucl.Phys. B 813 (2009) 1;arXiv: 0809.2409v3

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    34/47

    I Cholis et al Phys Rev D 80 (2009)

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    35/47

    Interpretation: DMI. Cholis et al. Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009)

    123518; arXiv:0811.3641v1

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    36/47

    Interpretation: DM

    P. Grajek et al., Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009)043506; arXiv: 0812.4555v1Non-thermal wino-like neutralinoVarying propagation model, no boostfactor

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    37/47

    Astrophysical Explanation: SNR

    P.Blasi, arXiv:0903.2794 [astro-ph]

    Positrons (andelectrons) producedas secondaries inthe sources (e.g.SNR) where CRsare accelerated.But also othersecondaries areproduced:significant increaseexpected in the p/pand B/C ratios.

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    38/47

    Mechanism: the spinning B of the pulsar strips e-

    thataccelerated at the polar cap or at the outer gap emit thatmake production of e that are trapped in the cloud,further accelerated and later released at ~ 10 5 years.

    Young (T < 10 5 years) and nearby (< 1kpc) If not: too much diffusion, low energy, too low flux.

    Geminga: 157 parsecs from Earth and 370,000 years old B0656+14: 290 parsecs from Earth and 110,000 years old.

    Diffuse mature pulsars

    Astrophysical Explanation:Pulsars

    Astrophysical Explanation:

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    39/47

    Astrophysical Explanation:Pulsars

    H. Yksak et al., arXiv:0810.2784v2Contributions of e- & e+ fromGeminga assuming different distance,age and energetic of the pulsar

    diffuse mature &nearby young pulsarsHooper, Blasi, and SerpicoarXiv:0810.1527

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    40/47

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    41/47

    PAMELA Electron (e -) Spectrum

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    42/47

    El fl b k i h ?

    PAMELA El t ( -) S t

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    43/47

    Electron flux - break in the spectrum?PAMELA Electron (e -) Spectrum

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    44/47

    PAMELA Electron (e -) Spectrum

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    45/47

    PAMELA Electron (e -) Spectrum

    Mirko Boezio, UCLA Dark Matter 2010,2010/02/24

    Summary

  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    46/47

    SummaryPAMELA has been in orbit and studying cosmic rays for ~42 months.

    >109

    triggers registered and >18 TB of data has been down-linked.Antiproton-to-proton flux ratio and antiproton energy spectrum (~100

    MeV - ~200 GeV) show no significant deviations from secondaryproduction expectations.

    High energy positron fraction (>10 GeV) increases significantly (andunexpectedly!) with energy. Primary source?Data at higher energies might help to resolve origin of rise (spilloverlimit ~300 GeV).

    e- spectrum up to ~200 GeV shows spectral features that may point toadditional components. Analysis is ongoing to increase the statistics andexpand the measurement of the e- spectrum up to ~500 GeV and e+

    spectrum up to ~300 GeV ( all electrum (e - + e +) spectrum up to ~1 TV).

    Furthemore: PAMELA is going to provide measurements on elemental spectra and low mass isotopes with an unprecedentedstatistical precision and is helping to improve the understanding of particle propagation in the interstellar medium

    PAMELA is able to measure the high energy tail of solar particles. PAMELA is going to set a new lower limit for finding Antihelium

    http://pamela.roma2.infn.it

    http://pamela.roma2.infn.it/http://pamela.roma2.infn.it/
  • 8/6/2019 Recent PAMELA Results

    47/47

    Mi k B i UCLA D k M tt 2010