Upload
duongtram
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Preservatives
EU Regulatory Landscape and Safety
Overview
Evelyn Coelis
Issue Manager Technical Regulatory Affairs
2 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Content
• Cosmetics Europe The Personal Care
Association
• Preservatives in EU Cosmetics Regulation and
general state-of-play
• Preservatives under the spotlight – safety and
regulatory status
• Conclusions
2
3 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
In Brief
Cosmetics Europe is the European trade
association representing the interests of the
cosmetics, toiletry and perfumery industry.
4 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Corporate Members
3
5 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
National Associations
• Austria -FCIO
• Belgium -DETIC
• Bulgaria - BNAEOPC
• Czech Republic - CSZV
• Denmark -SPT
• Estonia - FECI
• Finland - TY
• France - FEBEA
• Germany - IKW
• Greece - PSVAK
• Hungary - KOZMOS
• Ireland - ICDA
• Italy - UNIPRO
• Latvia - LAKIFA
• Lithuania - LIKOCHEMA
• Luxembourg - DETIC
• Netherlands - NCV
• Norway – KLF
• Poland - PACHCP
• Poland - PUCI
• Portugal - AIC
• Russia - APCoHM
• Russia - PCAR
• Romania - RUCODEM
• Serbia - KOZMODET
• Slovakia -SZZV
• Slovenia - KPC
• Spain -STANPA
• weden - KTF
• Switzerland - SKW
• Turkey - KTSD
• United Kingdom -CTPA
6 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Correspondent Members
4
7 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
International collaboration
• Lowering trade barriers
• Bilateral and multilateral
• Different levels (FTAs (TTIP), ICCR, ISO)
https://www.cosmeticseurope.eu
8 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
II. Preservatives in the EU Cosmetics
Regulation & General State-of-Play
5
9 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Anything new?
Preservation:
• Adequate product preservation
• Annex I – Cosmetic Product Safety Report – Part
A.3 Microbiological requirements (incl. results of
preservation challenge test)
– Only what, no guidance on how
– ISO EN standards (EN ISO 29621:2010; EN ISO 11930:2012
Preservatives:
• Positive list (Annex V) – Primary fuction product
preservation
• Application process for new preservatives
Definition: “substances which are exclusively
or mainly intended to inhibit the development
of microorganisms in cosmetic products”
Some guidance on germ limits and efficient
preservation testing in SCCS Notes of Guidance
(Dec. 2012)
10 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Other relevant EU Regulatory schemes
• Biocidal Products Regulation
– New regulation applicable (Sept. ‘13)
– Cosmetic products exempted
• REACH
– Hazard based, risk considerations only at 2nd
stage
– Cosmetic products use exempted for human
safety related measures
• CLP
– Hazard, human & environmental safety
– Link with Cosmetics Regulation (Art. 15 – CMR)
6
11 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Current state-of-play
• Annex V: 54 entries
• Frequently used1: 12
• Under regulatory review over past years :
19 (9 of the 12 frequently used)
• Last new applications:
– MIT (1st submission ‘02’05: included but currently under
review)
– ELA (1st submission ‘03’10: regulated)
– BIT (1st submission ‘04’13: lack of data, ban expected)
– Citric acid/silver citrate (1st submission ‘08’13: regulation
expected)
• Multi functional ingredients
1D.C. Steinberg; Frequency of preservative use. Cosmetics and Toiletries, 2010: Vol. 125, N°11
12 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
III.Preservatives under the spotlight –
Safety and Regulatory Status
7
13 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Parabens – lineair chain Most recent SCCS opinion and consequences
• SCCS assessment of lineair chain parabens re-opened due
to new data (repr. tox) and Member State concern
Revised SCCS opinion (adopted in May 2013)
Main SCCS conclusions unchanged:
Methyl and ethyl paraben remain safe as used.
Propyl and butyl paraben: use levels should be reduced to 0.19 %
expressed as ester.
Regulatory process restarted (proposal and public consultation
(deadline for comments 1 Nov. ‘13)
CE comments (transition period and expression of conc.)
Adoption of regulation expected in Feb ‘13
In the absence of sufficient information on the metabolism of
parabens in humans, which differs significantly from the rodent
metabolism, the SCCS can not revise its conclusions on maximum
use levels.
The current way of assessing the exposure to sunscreens is
sufficiently protective for all age groups. The SCCS also
emphasised that small children up to six months should not be
exposed to direct sunlight at all.
http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/files/pdf/parabens/parabens_pc_en.pdf
14 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Parabens (2) Ban of five parabens
• Scope: isopropyl-, isobutyl-, benzyl-, phenyl-,
and pentyl paraben
• Ban adopted on 10 Oct ‘13
• Expected publication of the legislation: ~ Feb ’14
Transition periods:
For new products: date of publication + 20d
+ 6 months
For existing products: date of publication
+ 20d + 15 months
8
15 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Phenoxytehanol
Regulated in cosmetics: Annex V, 29 (max. conc. 1.0%)
• Re-evaluation of safety by French Health Authorities, focus:
children < 3 years
Recommendation of French authorities: (i) Ban of use in
products for nappy zone, (ii) Max. conc. Of 4.0% in all other
products for children < 3 years
EC follow up:
Stakeholders call for data (deadline: 8 Dec. ’13)
Mandate to SCCS to evaluate safe use (expected in Dec. ‘13)
16 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Phenoxytehanol (2)
CE position and approach:
French assessment (i) not in accordance with EU (SCCS)
requirements for baby safety assessments and (ii) based on
outdated safety data
Preparation (by CE interested parties group) of complete safety
dossier for submission to EC/SCCS
Based on correct safety assessment approach and latest
available safety data: No safety concern, all current use can be
supported
9
17 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Methylisothiazolinone (MIT)
Regulated in cosmetics: Annex V, 57 (max. conc. 0.01%)
Relatively recent (2005)
• Recent clinical data showing increase in positive patch
test reactions to MIT in patients with dermatitis
• Request by Member States and dermatologists to re-
evaluate safe use of MIT
EC follow-up:
Sept. ‘13 - Mandate to SCCS to re-evaluate current use based
on clinical data, SCCS opinion due in Dec ‘13
18 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Methylisothiazolinone (MIT) (2)
CE position and approach:
• Assess clinical data (indication only) and determine
relevant risk management measures (primary, secondary
prevention)
• Based on available risk assessment assessment tools
(QRA), certain applications cannot be supported
• Engage in discussions with dermatologists, present
industry approach and work towards joint solution
10
19 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Relation preservatives - allergy
Dillarstone effect
P1
Prevalence of
contact dermatitis
Use cycle of
Preservatives
P2
C1
C2
20 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Formaldehyde
Regulated in cosmetics (Preservative (Annex V, 5): max. conc. (free
FA) 0.1% in oral care, 0.2% in other products, prohibited in aerosol
products, labelling requirement > 0.05% and Nail hardeners (Annex III,
13): max. conc. 5%, use instruction and labelling)
• Reclassification (CMR Carc. Cat. 1A) - 5th ATP to CLP (application
date: Jan ’15)
Under EUCosReg (Art. 15.2): Automatic ban unless exemption
criteria fulfilled
Lack of suitable alternatives
Naturally present in food or regulated in EU Food Legislation
Evaluated and found safe by SCCS (incl. aggregate exposure
assessment)
CE interested parties group – support of released FA coming from
current use of FA releasing preservatives (0.05 % (free FA)) and use of
FA in nail hardeners (2.2% (free FA))
Formaldehyde (CAS 50-00-0),
not the FA releasing
preservatives
11
21 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Polyaminopropylbiguanide
Regulated in cosmetics (Annex V, 28): max. conc.
0.3%)
• Classification (CMR Carc. Cat. 2) - 6th ATP to
CLP (application date: April ‘15)
Under EUCosReg (Art. 15.1): Automatic ban
unless exemption criterion fulfilled Evaluated and found safe by SCCS
CE interested parties group – support of current
use except use in aerosol products
22 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
And…
Substance Status in EU
Benzoic acid Human health, proposal for harmonised classification (not CMR)
Benzyl alcohol Considered as a potential fragrance allergen
BIT Application for preservative use, SCCS review and unfavourable
opinion (sensitisation, also non-preservative use), adoption of
ban awaited
Cetyl Pyridinium
Chloride
Application for use as preservative (antimicrobial use, oral care).
SCCS opinion awaited.
Chloroacetamide CMR, SCCS review and unfavourable opinion (not supported,
lack of data), adoption of ban awaited
Chlorphenesin,
chlorhexidine)
Regular media/NGO attention in Northern Europe
Cis-CTAC CMR 2 class., SCCS review and unfavourable opinion (Dec. ‘11).
Cis-CTAC considered as banned. Still to be delisted.
12
23 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
And… (2)
Status in EU
Citric acid/silver citrate Application for use as preservative and active in deodorant and
APs, SCCS review and favourable opinion (‘09), adoption of
regulation awaited.
Climbazole Additional non preservative use (foot care); SCCS review (cross-
resistance, borderline) and favourable opinion (Feb ‘13);
regulatory follow-up awaited
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate Additional use (oral care); SCCS review and opinion (Sep. ‘13)
(mouthwash only) – public consultation
Glutaraldehyde Human and environmental safety, CLP (not CMR) and BPD review
ongoing.
IPBC Regulated. Part of EC survey on iodine exposure. Harmonised
classification expected (human health not CMR)
Mercury containing
preservatives
(phenylmercury salts
and thiomersal)
Environmental safety – New Minamata Convention (Apr. ‘13)
(phase out by 2020, cosmetics > 1ppm except preservative use in
eye area)
24 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
And… (3)
Substance Status in EU
MIT/CMIT State-of-the art submission request; SCCS review (sensitisation,
only rinse-off supported) and favourable opinion; regulation
awaited (discussion on label warning)
O-phenylphenol Human health, Member State recommendation to EC to ban
preservative, public call for data (deadline 9 Dec ‘13), SCCS
evaluation and regulation expected
Triclosan Antimicrobial resistance and alleged ED, SCCS review and
favourable opinion (acceptable reduction for mouthwash),
regulation adopted (Oct. ‘13) – EU biocides and REACH (ED)
review ongoing
4-hydroxybenzoic acid Alleged ED, included on REACH substance review list (Feb’ ’12)
13
25 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
IV.Conclusions
26 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Conclusions
RISK PERCEPTION NGO/MEDIA ATTENTION
RISK ASSESSMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK COMMUNCIATION
POLITICAL PRESURE
RISK REDUCTION
Downwards spiral in EU
knock-on effect internationally
Consumer/ public
Health authorities/ scientific world
Heavy EU
regulatory
environment
EU animal testing ban
Free of
preservative
claims
Actions by
retailers
14
27 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Ingredients
Parabens
Citric acid and silver citrate
Acetaldehyde
Kojic Acid MCI/MI
Aluminium
Po
lido
ca
no
l H
air d
ye
s
D4/D5
EU Cosmetics Regulation
Annex I
Annex reviews
Roles &
Responsib.
Notification
CPNP
GMP
Labelling
Undesirable
effects
Claims Nanomaterials
International convergence Upstream/sidestream Regulations
Cosmetics
Regulation
28 PCPC Annual Science Symposium October 2013, Newark
Conclusions (2)
Need for global industry « one voice »
ingredient defence strategy
– Not only « one-by-one » approach, but general
strategy
– Communication, positive messaging, vocal
industry
– Science (also independent scientists)