Upload
iris-chambers
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rebecca L. Renshaw, University of PittsburghCharlotte Fisher, Western PA School for Blind Children
Jean May, Delaware Health and Social Services, Division for the Visually Impaired
Penn-Del AER Membership Committee Survey: Demographics of Professionals
Introduction
Penn-Del AER Membership Committee surveyed current members, lapsed members (individuals who allowed their membership to expire), and non-members (individuals who have not chosen to be members).
Background
In order to increase membership, Penn-Del AER Membership Committee wanted to better understand the demographics of current, lapsed, and non-members.
Methods
Administered through an on-line survey tool
Current Members Survey: 219 survey requests sent, 86 completed
Lapsed and Non-Members Survey: 351 survey requests sent, 32 completed
Results: Current Members Survey
Introduced to AER: University Personnel (66.3%)
Number of years AER member: 6-10 (26.7%) Joined AER: During university program or
within first 5 years in profession (88.4%) Number of years in field: 21 or more (33.7%) Main Area of Focus: O&M (65%), TVI (62%) Populations served: School-Aged (86%) Reason for joining: Professional development
opportunities (77%)
Results: Current Members Survey (cont.)
Like the best: Professional development and conferences (40%)
Like the least: Cost of membership (47%) Membership ever lapse: No (72%) What can AER do: Increase or change
professional development / networking opportunities (51%)
Ways to increase membership: Decrease membership cost (20%)
Regional meetings: Yes (69%)
Results: Lapsed and Non-Member Survey
Number of years in field: 21 or more (25.6%) Main Area of Focus: TVI (57%) Populations served: School-Aged (81%) Attended Spring Vision Conference: 6 or
more times (41%)
Results: Lapsed Members Survey
Introduced to AER: University Personnel (46.7%)
Number of years AER member: 0-5 (73.3%) Joined AER: During university program or
within first 5 years in profession (86.7%) Like the best: Publications (60%) Like the least: Cost of membership (79%) Reason have not renewed: Cost (60%) Consider reinstatement: If lower cost of
membership or had agency support (50%).
Results: Non-Members Survey
Perceived potential benefit: Professional development opportunities (56%)
Reason have not joined: Cost of membership (86%)
Consider joining: If lower cost or agency covered cost (79%)
Limitations
Addresses for lapsed members were not current so limited responses.
Low rate of response for lapsed members and non-members.
Separate surveys should have been administered for lapsed members and non-members.
Conclusions
Continue to target individuals in university preparation programs
Provide mentor program for individuals who are within the first 5 years in the profession
Increase number of professional development / networking opportunities
Decrease cost of membership or encourage agency support