Upload
flora-bishop
View
216
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kids Having Kids: Economic and Social Consequences of Teen
PregnancyWorkshop on Tackling Adolescent Reproductive Health
World Bank
Rebecca A. Maynard, Ph.D.University of Pennsylvania
December 1, 2009
3-Part Agenda Brief overview of the Kids Having Kids
project Review of the methodology Summary of findings
The Kids Having Kids Initiative
Rationale• High and rising rates of teenage pregnancy• Increasing proportions of pregnant teens
keeping and raising babies• Most babies reared by single mothers• Most babies reared in poverty
Goal• Document the consequences of kids having
kids• Estimate the costs of teenage childbearing
Strong Indicators of High Costs
Single parent households • Welfare dependence• Poverty
Low school completion rates Child abuse and neglect Poor child outcomes
Robin Hood Foundation Initiative
University of Chicago’s Harris School Nationally prominent scholars Research and policy advisors Cost analysis overlay
First edition 1997 Second edition 2007
Call to Action: Births per 1000 Pre 1992
guttmacher.org/pubs/2006/09/12/USTPstats.p
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 199140.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
51.050.2 50.6
53.0
57.3
60.361.8
Favorable Trends Leading Up to and Following First Study
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Pregnancy Rate Abortion Rate Birth Rate
422,000 Births to Teens (2004):80% First Births
Birth Before Age 18
Birth Age 18 - 19
Total
Total 140,761 281,282 422,023
First Birth 126,471 210,312 336,783
Higher Order 14,290 70,970 85,240
Eight-Part Study Consequences for Teenage Mothers Consequences for Fathers of Children Born
to Teenage Mothers Consequences for Children
• Social and psychological• Abuse and neglect• Criminal activity• Adult earnings
Consequences for Taxpayers and Society Evidence of Effective Prevention
Strategies
Method for Measuring Impacts
Mothers: HS Diploma or GED Children: HS Completion
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
70 736978
-1-5
Observed-Teenage MothersPredicted Outcomes if Delayed Childbear-ingEstimated Consequence
Aggregating “Costs” of Teenage
Childbearing Perspectives
• Teenage mothers• Taxpayers• Society (distribution neutral)
Assigning value/cost to some consequences• E.g., incarceration spells; administrative costs of
welfare; foster care; education of children Aggregating over families
• Accounting for compositional effects and cohort size Steady-state accounting 5% annual discount
Teen Parents Gain Some (Average per Year Over 15 Years)
Productivity• Mother• Father• Children
Child Support Public Assistance
• Cash/near cash Criminal justice Out-of-pocket
health care costsBefore age
18Age 18 -
19
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$11,178 $12,147
$9,501
$11,842
Observed If Delayed
Costs to Taxpayers (Billions per Year)
Tax revenues• Mother• Father• Children
Public Assistance• Cash/near cash• Medical
Foster care Special education Criminal justice
Series1 $(1.00)
$-
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00 $7.61
$(0.31)
$7.30
Before Age 18Before Age 19
Costs to Society (Billions per Year)
Productivity• Mother• Father• Children
Public service administration• Cash/near cash• Medical
Foster care Special education Criminal justice
Society $-
$5.0
$10.0
$15.0
$20.0
$25.0
$30.0 $23.0
$4.8
$27.8
Before Age 18Age 18-19Total
Prevention Is Challenging: Review of Evidence
Sexual activity risk:100• 21 studies/ 40
estimates Similar results
across four types of programs
Series10.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.013.7
15.0
Intervention GroupControl Group
Effectiveness of Prevention Programs
Pregnancy risk:100• 24 studies/ 34
estimates Small impacts Significant only for
multi-component youth development programs• 3 studies/6
estimates
Series10.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.0013.70
15.00
Intervention GroupControl Group
Effectiveness of Prevention Programs
Pregnancy :100
• 13 studies/ 25 estimates
Small average impacts
Impacts distributed across various program models Series1
0123456789
10
8.2 8.6
Intervention GroupControl Group
Implications There are real costs of teenage
childbearing• Borne by taxpayers and society, not the
teens Solutions are not obvious
• Health and sex ed seems necessary, but not sufficient
• Social norms seem to play an important role Consider testing more differentiated
interventions