Upload
barry-weaver
View
16
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 5b More Fallacies. By David Kelsey. Ad Hominem. To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes the claims that he or she makes . Confusing the person and the claim : Criticizing the person not the claim itself. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Reasoning & Problem SolvingLecture 5b
More Fallacies
By David Kelsey
Ad Hominem
• To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes the claims that he or she makes.
• Confusing the person and the claim: – Criticizing the person not the claim itself
Ad Hominem again
• A personal attack ad hominem: – claiming that because someone has
certain negative features it follows that a claim she makes is false.
– Examples
• Inconsistency ad hominem: – to hold that what someone says is
false because it is inconsistent with something else she has said or done.
– Examples
Circumstantial &Positive ad hominem
• Circumstantial ad hominem: – holding that because a person’s
circumstances are a certain way it follows that some claim she makes is false.
– Priest example
• Positive ad hominem: – holding that the claim a person
makes follows from some positive consideration about the person.
– Einstein example
Poisoning the Well
• To poison the well– an in advance ad hominem.
– For example, • Rumors…
Genetic Fallacy
• When one tries to refute a claim based on its origin or history she has committed the genetic fallacy.
– Belief in God’s existence
– Genetic fallacy vs. Circumstantial ad Hominem
Straw Man
• Straw man fallacy: – trying to refute a claim or argument by distorting it or oversimplifying it or
misrepresenting it in such a way that it can be easily refuted.
– Reconfiguring a claim
– Knocking down a straw man
– Knocking down a straw man is easy business but knocking down a good argument is not.
False Dilemma
• False dilemma – limits considerations to a choice between only two alternatives although other
reasonable alternatives are available.
– The form of a false dilemma:
– Using a false dilemma for the purpose of deception
– Example:• Prayer in public schools
Perfectionist fallacy
• Perfectionist fallacy – Rejecting a policy or claim because it isn’t perfect.
– A kind of false dilemma
– Example:
• Instant replay
Line Drawing Fallacy
• The Line-Drawing fallacy – insisting that a conceptual line must be drawn at a particular point when drawing such
a line isn’t necessary.
– Examples:• Rich• Bald • Excessive force
– Line drawing and Vagueness
Slippery Slope
• Slippery Slope: – Claiming that if we let some thing X occur it follows that something else Y will occur,
yet there is no reason to think that if X occurs so must Y.
– Causation and slippery slope arguments
– Example:
• Hand gun laws
Misplacing the Burden of Proof
• Misplacing the burden of proof:– Misplacing the burden of proof on the wrong side of an issue.
– The 2 sides of an issue
– Example:• Should we go to war with Iraq?
The burden of proof
• To say the burden of proof rests on a claim:– This just means that if one is to hold this position, then she must support it with
argumentation.
– Example:
• Iraq again
– Temporal Priority
Where does the burden lie?
• Placing the burden– Plausibility:
• The burden ought to be placed on whichever side of an issue is less plausible.
• Example:
– Affirmative: • The burden, in general, ought to be placed on the affirmative side of an
issue.• Example:
The burden of proof #3
• Special Circumstances: – Under special circumstances the burden of proof is placed on a particular
side of an issue.
– The court: • The defendant is always innocent until proven guilty
Appeal to ignorance
• Appeal to ignorance– claiming that we should believe that some claim is true because no one has
proved it false.
– Example:• Ghosts exist
Begging the Question
• One begs the question when one of the premises of her argument assumes the truth of the conclusion.
• Examples:– Abortion– An argument for God’s existence
• Circular reasoning