Upload
harding-conway
View
32
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
REAL WORLD EVALUATIONS Conducting evaluations under budget, time, data and political constraints. Live Webcast Knowledge Sharing Event 12 May 2009. DevInfo. This series of webcasts are based on the book published by UNICEF in partnership with key international institutions. Authors: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
REAL WORLD EVALUATIONS
Conducting evaluations under budget, time, data and political constraints
Live Webcast Knowledge Sharing Event12 May 2009
This series of webcasts are based on the book published by UNICEF in partnership with key
international institutions
Authors:
21 global evaluation leaders
Partnership:
UNICEF, WB, UNECE, IDEAS, IOCE, DevInfo and MICS
Available for free download at:
http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/resources_10597.html
The recording of the previous webcast events are available at http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/resources_11137.html
First event on Country-led M&E systems with:
• the editor of the book, Marco Segone, Regional Chief, Monitoring and Evaluation, UNICEF CEE/CIS;
• Oumul Ba Tall, President, IOCE;
• Denis Jobin, Vice President, IDEAS
Second event on Strengthening country-led M&E systems. Good practices in using Devinfo, with:
•Nicolas Pron, Global DevInfo Administrator
•Kris Oswalt, President, CSF
REAL WORLD EVALUATIONS
Conducting evaluations under budget, time, data and political constraints
Marco Segone, Regional Chief, Monitoring and Evaluation, UNICEF CEE/CIS,
and former Vice President, IOCEE-mail: [email protected]
Introduction and kick-off questions
Evidence into practice: Increasing the uptake of evidence in policy
making
Data Data ProvidersProviders(Statisticians, (Statisticians, Evaluators, Evaluators, Researchers)Researchers)
Data UsersData Users(Policy Makers)(Policy Makers)
Need to improve dialogue
Improving “usability”of evidence
Reliableand
trustworthyevidence
Getting appropriate
buy-in
Incentives to use
evidence
What ?Why?
When?How?
Effective dissemination
Wide Access
The “quality” challenge: How to match technical rigour and policy
relevance?
Technical rigourTechnical rigourbut no policy but no policy
relevancerelevance
Policy relevance Policy relevance but no technical rigourbut no technical rigour
Better evidence, technically rigorous and policy relevant.
Country-led M&E systems (CLES):
a strategy to matcha strategy to match technical rigour with policy relevancetechnical rigour with policy relevance
Technical rigourTechnical rigour
but no policy relevancebut no policy relevance
Policy relevance
Policy relevance
but no technical rigour
but no technical rigour
Better evidence,
technically rigorous
and policy relevant
Better Better PoliciesPolicies
Better Better Development Development
ResultsResults