13
Real Space Structural Real Space Structural Refinement Refinement in EM in EM Houston Workshop April 20, 2006 James Z. Chen James Z. Chen Grigorieff Lab, HHMI at Brandeis University

Real Space Structural Refinement in EM - biomachina.orgsitus.biomachina.org/hn06/talks/Chen/2_refinement_CD.pdf · Real Space Structural Refinement in EM Houston Workshop ... [Chapman,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Real Space Structural Real Space Structural Refinement Refinement in EMin EM

Houston Workshop

April 20, 2006

James Z. ChenJames Z. ChenGrigorieff Lab, HHMI at Brandeis University

Topics

Model-density docking

Ligand-receptor docking

Force-field-restrained EM docking

Application demo

Model-Density Docking

SITUS [Wriggers et al., 1999]

COAN [Volkmann & Hanein, 1999]

DOCKEM [Roseman, 2000]

EMFit [Rossmann et al., 2001]

Helixhunter & Foldhunter [Jiang et al., 2001]

RSRef [Chapman, 1995]

Ligand-Receptor Docking

Molecular Mechanics Force FieldsBond, angle, dihedral interactions

VDW, Coulomb, H-bond interactions

Environmental mean-fields

Molecular Interaction SimulationX-PLOR [Brünger, 1987]

DOCK and AutoDOCK [Olson et al., 1990]

VMD, FlexDock, FT-DOCK, and many more

Docking in EM

Why force-fieldsReduce DOF in low-resolution EM density map

Density matching ≠ realistic structure

Molecular complex modelingProtein-ligand docking prediction (CAPRI)

Density-guided homology modelingProtein folding prediction (CASP)

RSRef Methodology

( )2∑ −+=⊕atoms

calcobs bkE ρρ

**

*2**

2)2sin()(4)(

*

*

ddrd

rdddgQrhigh

low

d

dcalc π

ππρ ∫=

A resolution-dependant density calculation

RSMD Refinement

DynamicsDynamics

• Rigid-body MD• Torsion-angle MD• Cartesian-space MD• Energy minimization

E E ETOTAL CHEM= + ⊕.

EM Refinement Protocol

1. Rigid-body annotation

2. NCS restraints enforcement

3. Torsion-angle degree of freedom

4. Refinement via simulated annealing

Helical Structure of Flagella HOOK

Optimal Conformation

Crystal StructureCrystal StructureE(bond)=0.990 E(E(bond)=0.990 E(anglangl)=10.353 E()=10.353 E(torstors)=3.161 )=3.161 E(VDW )=E(VDW )=--208. E(PVDW)=0.3E+8 E(208. E(PVDW)=0.3E+8 E(rresrres)=167.0)=167.0

Manual AdjustmentManual AdjustmentE(bond)=0.975 E(E(bond)=0.975 E(anglangl)=10.397 E()=10.397 E(torstors)=3.169 )=3.169 E(VDW)=0.5E+7 E(PVDW)=0.3E+5 E(E(VDW)=0.5E+7 E(PVDW)=0.3E+5 E(rresrres)=161.0)=161.0

RSMD RefinementRSMD RefinementE(bond)=0.923 E(E(bond)=0.923 E(anglangl)=10.351 E()=10.351 E(torstors)=3.138 )=3.138 E(VDW )=E(VDW )=--191. E(PVDW)=191. E(PVDW)=--14.38 E(14.38 E(rresrres)=156.0)=156.0

Hierarchical Refinement of NSF

20 20 ÅÅ 17 17 ÅÅ

14 14 ÅÅ 11 11 ÅÅ

Actin-DHP Docking

CC = 0.49CC = 0.49 CC = 0.67CC = 0.67

The Road Ahead …

Density map & structureAtomic scattering v.s. electron scattering

Time-resolved dynamics study via EMConformational snapshots from EM experiments

Dynamics simulation to “connect the dots”

Interpretation of an EM refinementResolution, resolution, and resolution !!!

EM modeling from large, heterogeneous dataset