2
7/14/2019 Reading Response Week 6 – Cinema & Architecture | Media and Architecture 2012 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/reading-response-week-6-cinema-architecture-media-and-architecture 1/2 02/12/13 12:09 Reading Response Week 6 – Cinema & Architecture | Media and Architecture 2012 Página 1 de 2 http://www.wordsinspace.net/media-architecture/2012-spring/?p=526 Media and Architecture 2012 A Graduate Seminar in Media Studies at The New School. Taught by Shannon Mattern.  About the Class Download Syllabus Requirements + Assignments Procedures + Policies Schedule + Readings Class Announcement Events + Exhibitions Exhibition/Site Review In the News Interesting Stuff Reading Response Search « Previous Next » Reading Response Week 6 – Cinema & Architecture By Nikolas February 28, 2012 Reading Response No Comments Reading Response Week 6 – Architecture and Cinema I believe that Eisenstein’s (2009) approach to linking architecture and cinema offers a fruitful approach to start the discussion on cinema and architecture. He refers to film as montage since moving images are applied to each other and, thus, links cinema and architecture. In Site-seeing: Architecture and the Moving Image Giuliana Bruno (1997) highlights the feature of mobility  which links the moving image – cinema – and architecture and is a central theme throughout her article. In this regard she mentions that “[c]inema—the ‘motion’ picture—inhabits modernity’s moving urban culture.” (ibid, p. 11). Cinema frequently depicts our society and since it is an audiovisual experience it affects various other forms of arts, such as architecture. With the advent of the cinema architectural forms, such as arcades and department stores have originated, but especially transportation is of particular significance influencing not only architecture and the urban space, but urban culture in general. Bruno emphasizes architecture’s strong influence on cinema. According to her “architectures of transit prepared the ground for the invention of the moving image—an outcome of the age of travel culture and the very epitome of modernity” (ibid, p. 11). Bruno also refers to the significance that the movie house possesses for urban areas and highlights that film is a manifestation of the metropolis. In this regard she refers to Sigfried Kracauer who outlines “film’s material  attraction for the street, the pavement, feet walking over stones.” (p. 12). Therefore, the strong link between architecture and film results in the fact that both are heavily dependent on mobility. With reference to Le Corbusier as well as Eisenstein and Choisy, Bruno points out that architecture is mostly perceived while moving. Moreover, urban areas are strongly influenced by architecture which manifests itself in part in a city’s character. Since film often deals with society and culture, urban areas are often an integral part in film and therefore architecture cannot be ignored. Bruno relates to the movie house which is a core feature of Sigfried Kracauer’s essay Cult of Distraction: On Berlin’s Picture Palaces. Kracauer depicts the picture houses in Berlin as palaces of distraction revealing the total artwork (Gesamtkunstwerk) of effects” (p. 92). Ockman’s essay Architecture in a Mode of Distraction: Eight Takes on Jacques Tati’s  Playtime gave me a chance to actually receive a greater understanding of the connection between architecture and film. In this regard Ockman quotes Walter Benjamin who highlights that both cinema and architecture are received “’by a collectivity in a mode of distraction’” (p. 171) in line with Kracauer as mentioned previously. However, film in contrast to architecture is limited insofar as the viewer stays in one location and cannot actually dive into the experience; at least not physically although mentally. In contrast architecture can not only be perceived but it also offers a haptic experience. Ockman highlights that during the advent of film, this medium not only visually but also technically symbolized the industrialized age, urban metropolitan areas as well as modernity; [m]etonymically, as well as metaphorically, the cinematic medium translated the impact of industrialization into the realm of aesthetic reception” (p. 172). In this regard Ockman repeatedly refers to Walter Benjamin who “suggests that the highly technical, abstract aesthetic of modern architecture has the potential to educate the masses for the changes wrought by the contemporary epoch” (p. 174). I was especially intrigued by the way in which Ockman refers to Tati’s film Playtime which highlights on the one hand how strongly American Culture influenced Europe after WW2 and on the other hand also reveals the bureaucratic and consumerist nature of modern society. This work unless otherwise ex ressl stated is licensed under a Creative Commons

Reading Response Week 6 – Cinema & Architecture | Media and Architecture 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 02/12/13 12:09Reading Response Week 6 Cinema & Architecture | Media and Architecture 2012

    Pgina 1 de 2http://www.wordsinspace.net/media-architecture/2012-spring/?p=526

    Media andArchitecture 2012A Graduate Seminar in Media Studies

    at The New School. Taught by

    Shannon Mattern.

    About the Class

    Download Syllabus

    Requirements + Assignments

    Procedures + Policies

    Schedule + Readings

    Class Announcement

    Events + Exhibitions

    Exhibition/Site Review

    In the News

    Interesting Stuff

    Reading Response

    Search

    Previous / Next

    Reading Response Week 6 Cinema & ArchitectureBy Nikolas / February 28, 2012 / Reading Response / No Comments

    Reading Response Week 6 Architecture and Cinema

    I believe that Eisensteins (2009) approach to linking architecture and cinema offers a fruitful approach tostart the discussion on cinema and architecture. He refers to film as montage since moving images areapplied to each other and, thus, links cinema and architecture. In Site-seeing: Architecture and theMoving Image Giuliana Bruno (1997) highlights the feature of mobility which links the moving image cinema and architecture and is a central theme throughout her article. In this regard she mentions that[c]inemathe motion pictureinhabits modernitys moving urban culture. (ibid, p. 11). Cinemafrequently depicts our society and since it is an audiovisual experience it affects various other forms ofarts, such as architecture. With the advent of the cinema architectural forms, such as arcades anddepartment stores have originated, but especially transportation is of particular significance influencingnot only architecture and the urban space, but urban culture in general. Bruno emphasizes architecturesstrong influence on cinema. According to her architectures of transit prepared the ground for theinvention of the moving imagean outcome of the age of travel culture and the very epitome ofmodernity (ibid, p. 11). Bruno also refers to the significance that the movie house possesses for urbanareas and highlights that film is a manifestation of the metropolis. In this regard she refers to SigfriedKracauer who outlines films material attraction for the street, the pavement, feet walking over stones.(p. 12). Therefore, the strong link between architecture and film results in the fact that both are heavilydependent on mobility. With reference to Le Corbusier as well as Eisenstein and Choisy, Bruno points outthat architecture is mostly perceived while moving. Moreover, urban areas are strongly influenced byarchitecture which manifests itself in part in a citys character. Since film often deals with society andculture, urban areas are often an integral part in film and therefore architecture cannot be ignored. Brunorelates to the movie house which is a core feature of Sigfried Kracauers essay Cult of Distraction: OnBerlins Picture Palaces. Kracauer depicts the picture houses in Berlin as palaces of distraction revealingthe total artwork (Gesamtkunstwerk) of effects (p. 92). Ockmans essay Architecture in a Mode ofDistraction: Eight Takes on Jacques Tatis Playtime gave me a chance to actually receive a greater

    understanding of the connection between architecture and film. In this regard Ockman quotes WalterBenjamin who highlights that both cinema and architecture are received by a collectivity in a mode ofdistraction (p. 171) in line with Kracauer as mentioned previously. However, film in contrast toarchitecture is limited insofar as the viewer stays in one location and cannot actually dive into theexperience; at least not physically although mentally. In contrast architecture can not only be perceivedbut it also offers a haptic experience. Ockman highlights that during the advent of film, this medium notonly visually but also technically symbolized the industrialized age, urban metropolitan areas as well asmodernity; [m]etonymically, as well as metaphorically, the cinematic medium translated the impact ofindustrialization into the realm of aesthetic reception (p. 172). In this regard Ockman repeatedly refers toWalter Benjamin who suggests that the highly technical, abstract aesthetic of modern architecture hasthe potential to educate the masses for the changes wrought by the contemporary epoch (p. 174).

    I was especially intrigued by the way in which Ockman refers to Tatis film Playtime which highlights onthe one hand how strongly American Culture influenced Europe after WW2 and on the other hand alsoreveals the bureaucratic and consumerist nature of modern society.

    This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative Commons

  • 02/12/13 12:09Reading Response Week 6 Cinema & Architecture | Media and Architecture 2012

    Pgina 2 de 2http://www.wordsinspace.net/media-architecture/2012-spring/?p=526

    TweetTweet 0

    2012 Media and Architecture 2012

    Designed by Wpshower / Powered by WordPress

    Meta

    Login

    Log out

    Entries RSS

    Comments RSS

    WordPress.org

    a456

    Archinect

    Architectural League of New York

    BLDGBLOG

    City of Sound

    Grey Room

    Log

    loud paper

    mammoth

    M+A Links on Pinboard

    M+A Architecture References onZotero

    Places Journal

    Storefront for Art + Architecture

    Strange Harvest

    Studio-X

    things magazine

    Urban Omnibus

    Volume Magazine

    This work, unless otherwise expressly stated, is licensed under a Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

    Like Send Be the first of your friends to like this.