40
Reaction to Fire of Solids (Polymers and Composites) Stanislav I. Stoliarov Ecole thématique du CNRS sur la Science des Incendies et ses Applications Porticcio, 30/05 – 04/06 2015 Fire Protection Engineering

Reaction to Fire of Solids - univ-lorraine.fr

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Reaction to Fire of Solids(Polymers and Composites)

Stanislav I. Stoliarov

Ecole thématique du CNRS sur la Science des Incendies et ses Applications Porticcio, 30/05 – 04/06 2015

Fire Protection Engineering

Chemical Classification of Polymers

HomopolymersA and B arerepeat units

statistical

Copolymersblock

graft

Homo- or copolymer?

Poly[imino(1,6-dioxohexamethylene) imnohexamethylene] has high mechanical strength; it is used for bearing cages, electro-insulating elements, pipes, carpet fibers, ropes and conveyor belts.

Polymerization MechanismsStep Polymerization:Step Polymerization:

Isocyanate Polyol

Polyurethanes are used in the manufacture of flexible foam, rigid foam insulation, automotive suspension bushings, high performance adhesives, surface coatings and surface sealants and hard-plastic parts for electronic instruments.

Chain Polymerization:

Polystyrene is one of the most widely used polymers; its uses include protective

k i ( h packaging (such as packing peanuts and DVD cases), building insulation, containers, lids, bottles, trays and disposable cutlery.

Skeletal Structure of Polymers

Isotactic

Syndiotactic

Molar Mass and Degree of Polymerization

ii

iN M

NNM

- Number-average

molar mass, kg mol-1

i

ii

NMN

i

iiW M

MNMNM

ii

MNMN 2

- Weight-averagel

mol fraction

ii MN

mass fraction

ii MN molar mass

N

W

MMPDI - Polydispersity or heterogeneity index

M

unitrepeatMMx N

N - Number-average degree of polymerization

MW W i ht d f l i tiunitrepeatM

x WW - Weight-average degree of polymerization

Composite Materials

Macro: 10-3 to 10-6 m inclusions Nano: 10-7 to 10-9 m inclusions

Composites

Macro: 10 to 10 m inclusions Nano: 10 to 10 m inclusions

Particle Sandwich Fiber

Glass CarbonGlass Carbon

+Unsaturated polyesterPoly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) ->

with aluminum honeycomb

dissolved in styrene

High-impact polystyrene (HIPS)

+heat = Fiberglass Applications include

swimming pools,doors, sportingequipment andboat hulls.

Composite Materials

Macro: 10-3 to 10-6 m inclusions Nano: 10-7 to 10-9 m inclusions

Composites

Macro: 10 to 10 m inclusions Nano: 10 to 10 m inclusions

Particle Sandwich Fiber

Glass CarbonGlass Carbon

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) ->with aluminum honeycomb

+Bisphenol A epoxy

High-impact polystyrene (HIPS)+

hardener & heat = Carbon FiberA li ti i l dApplications includeaerospace,automotiveand sportingequipment.

Boeing 787

Composite Materials

Macro: 10-3 to 10-6 m inclusions Nano: 10-7 to 10-9 m inclusions

Composites

Macro: 10 to 10 m inclusions Nano: 10 to 10 m inclusions

Clay platelet based Carbon nanotube or platelet basedClay platelet based Carbon nanotube or platelet based

Hydrated montmorillonite(Mg0 33Al1 67)Si4O10(OH)2]Na0 33(Mg0.33Al1.67)Si4O10(OH)2]Na0.33

Single-wall carbon nanotube in polystyrene

- Nanoadditives may produce higher stiffness, strength and improved wear resistance atsmall (0.5-3 wt.%) loadings.

- Good dispersion in polymer is required and usually hard to achieve.

Mechanism of Polymer Combustion

To simply interpretation of key processes, the mechanism isconsidered within one-dimensional framework (only one

spatial coordinate)

Diffusion flame (gas phase)

Radiative and/or convective heat flux

Flame consumes all oxygen

Flame can be treated as a boundary condition turned on when a critical value of some a solid-phase d i t i

Pyrolyzingsolid

Flame consumes all oxygen (no oxygen at the surface)

descriptor is reached.

Heat

Radiative heat loss Morphologicalchanges ofthe solid (affect heat transport)

Phasetransitions

Morphological changes may include- formation of residue layer (char) - bubbles and fissures- melt flow

transfer Production ofgaseous fuel (vaporization is assumed to

be a part of decomposition)

Chemicaldecomposition

Gaseous fuel transport(and associated heat flow)

Central process Central process

Typical Study of Decomposition ChemistryExperimental setup:

Temperature controlledpyrolyzer (< 1 mm thick sample, inert atmosphere)(PET)

Gas chromatograph

Widely utilized for production ofbeverage and food containers.

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Flame ionization detector (FID)

Typical Study of Decomposition ChemistryExperimental setup:

Temperature controlledpyrolyzer (< 1 mm thick sample, inert atmosphere)(PET)

Gas chromatograph

Widely utilized for production ofbeverage and food containers.

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Typical Study of Decomposition ChemistryExperimental setup:

Temperature controlledpyrolyzer (< 1 mm thick sample, inert atmosphere)(PET)

Gas chromatograph

Widely utilized for production ofbeverage and food containers.

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Typical Study of Decomposition Chemistry

(PET)

The polymer has been reported to produce cyclic oligomers.Th li i ht f thi

Possible decomposition mechanism:

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

The oligomers might form this way:

Typical Study of Decomposition Chemistry

(PET)

Possible decomposition mechanism (continued):

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Typical Study of Decomposition Chemistry

(PET)

Possible decomposition mechanism (continued):

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Typical Study of Decomposition Chemistry

(PET)

Possible mechanisms for formation of char:

DOI: 10.1002/APP.39681

Decomposition of Polyethylene

- A decrease in polymer molar mass occurs prior to mass loss.

- Alkenes and alkanes with Cup to 140 are observed among gaseousproducts

- A review of over 200 publications.

products.

- Quantification of product yields especially of those of highmolecular mass is difficult. Measurement results lackconsistency of the atomic (C and H) ratio.

Decomposition of Polyethylene

The proposed reaction mechanism:

Initiation

Propagation

Transfer

Termination

Decomposition of Polyethylene

The proposed reaction mechanism: The proposed kinetics is based on the assumption that reaction rates are the same as those of similar compounds in the gas phase. I.e., the reaction rates are assumed to be not affected by the size of the molecule or condensed h i tphase environment.

The main source of rate constants is the NIST Kinetic Database.

Decomposition of Polystyrene

- The study consists of experiments and modeling.

- The experiments include controlled temperature pyrolysis (in sealed glass ampules)accompanied by gel permeation chromatography (polymer molecular mass analysis) accompanied by gel-permeation chromatography (polymer molecular mass analysis)

gas chromatography with FID (product yields)gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy (product structure analysis)

- The modeling is based on the method of moments.

Decomposition of Polystyrene

The proposed reaction mechanism:

Decomposition of Polystyrene

The proposed kinetics (also based on analogy with the gas phase reactions):

Decomposition of Polystyrene

Comparison of modeling predictions with experiments:

Lessons from the Decomposition Case Studies- A detailed, quantitative understanding of the polymer decomposition chemistry has not been achieved

and unlikely to be achieved in the near future.

- The main obstacle is an inability of the state of the art analytical methods to provide quantitativeinformation on elementary chemical processes operating in the condensed phaseinformation on elementary chemical processes operating in the condensed phase.

- Existing detailed kinetic models of polymer decomposition are few. These models rely heavily on theanalogy with the gas phase and their validation is incomplete.

- Chemical mechanism of char formation in polymers is unknown (even at a qualitative level).

- Perhaps, a more rational approach to incorporating chemistry of decomposition into a material burningmodel is to focus on the overall rate of production of gases (mass loss rate) and solid residue or char.

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

- Solid sample of 2-10 mg

TGA of Kydex (alloy of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl chloride))

100% of N2 100% of N2

- Heating rate of 3-50 K min-1

- Customizable gaseous atmosphere

TGA Data Interpretation

Pol -> s1 Int + (1 - s1) Gas1

Int -> s2 Char + (1 - s2) Gas2

][][1 Pol

Pol kdt

d Pol

Polor mkdt

dm1 (TGA sample composition is assumed to be spatially inform)

dtdms

dtdm PolGas1 )1( 1

IntPolInt mkmks

dtdm

211

)/exp();/exp( 222111 RTEAkRTEAk

IntGas2

IntChar mks

dtdmmks

dtdm

2222 )1(; s1, A1, E1, s2, A2, and E2 are fit to the TGA data. The model curve is computed by solving the kinetic equations numerically using a simple explicit finite difference

tTT 0

0;:0 Gas2CharGas1IntPolAt mmmmmmtboundaryconditions

approach.

TGA Data Interpretation

Predicting mass loss at different heating rates () is used for model validation:

The Simplest Model of Burning Process

Douglas fir

- Let us assume a thermally thick solid that decomposes at Tp:

24

2

4envp

ignTThTq

TTckt

envssext TThTq

qq141

- qloss (assumed to beapproximately constant)

tq

lossextenvpign

qqTTckt

lossqtan

- The burning rate is steady and expressed as: extq

T

pflameext

HcdT

TqqmF

p

4

- The burning rate is steady and expressed as:

extpflame q

LLTq 14

tanstransition

reactionsTenv&

heat of gasification, L

effbHmFHRR

tan Cone Calorimetry

combHmFHRR

Detailed, Numerical Pyrolysis ModelsGpyro ThermaKin FDS, sold phase

Chemical reactions multiple reactions;Arrhenius, nth order;

multiple reactions;Arrhenius, 1st or 2nd order;

multiple reactions;Arrhenius, nth order;Arrhenius, nth order;

1 or 2 reactantsArrhenius, 1st or 2nd order;1 or 2 reactants

Arrhenius, nth order;1 reactant

Phase transitions -- through constant rate reactions turned on at threshold temperature

--

Heat transport transient conduction;temperature dependent properties;in-depth absorption with surface re-

transient conduction;temperature dependent properties;in-depth absorption with in-depth re-radiation

transient conduction;temperature dependent properties;in-depth absorption with in-depth re-radiationwith surface re

radiationdepth re radiation in depth re radiation

Mass transport Darcy’s law Darcy’s lawand diffusion (hybrid)

No mass transport

Problem dimensionality

1-3 D 1-2 D 1 D

Boundary conditions somewhat flexible;can be coupled to FDS

highly flexible;include empirical pool and wall fire models

highly flexible;coupled to CFD

Implementation MatLab C++ Fortran

Material Is Represented by a Mixture of Components

ThermaKin formulation

Components are characterized by: mass density

heat capacityheat capacity

thermal conductivity

gas transfer coefficient

radiation absorption coefficient

surface emissivity

nThe properties depend on temperature:

Components are classified as: solid

nn10 TpTppproperty

Components are classified as: solid

liquid or

gaseous

Components May Undergo Reactions

ThermaKin formulation

B COMP B +  C COMP C D COMP D +  F COMP F +  heat

Vm

Vm

RTEexpArate CB

nn10 ThThhheat

F  B B F

Reactions are used to simulate temperature transitions:

Tlimit T

Material Volume and Swelling Factor ()

ThermaKin formulation

gases

gliquids

l

lsolids

s

ρm

ρm

ρmV

gasessolids &

material+ = = 0 :

gls ρρρ

gasesliquids

material+  0 :

gasessolids &liquids

material+ = = 1 :

gases

g

gliquids

l

ll

solids

s

ss ρ

mρm

ρm

gases

g

gliquids

l

lsolids

s

s

gls

ρm

ρm

ρm

ρρρ

Heat Transfer

ThermaKin formulation

QTh t f t f

TSkQ x

SThe rate of transfer  

xSkQ

comps1

Material conductivity  np kkk )(1 Qp

nVk

ccp VkV

k 1Qn

comps

c

cn

kV

comp 1 comp 2

Gas Transfer

ThermaKin formulation

Th f f fV/ρm

SρJ

gg

The rate of transfer of gas g,x

SρJ gg

/ )(

volume fraction of materialoccupied by gases

According to Boyle’s law, xxg

defg

gg

ggP

PSρV

/ρm

SρJ

)(

= const = 0 :xg

defg

gP

PSρ

J

as flow > 0 : P = const

xg

defgg PPSρJ

ga

Conservation Equations Are Formulated using Finite Elements

ThermaKin formulation

S Elements have rectangular shape.

LR

Δx

Elements are defined by component masses and temperature.

∆xVρm

Vρm

SρrateV∆t∆m RR

g

Rg

LLg

Lg

LRg

LRrxns

Rr

gr

RRg

∆x∆t

gases

LRg

RLLRg

RLLR

rxnsRr

Rr

RR

RR JTTc∆xTTSkrateheatV

∆t∆Tcm )(

21

∆x∆t 2

Boundary Conditions for 1-Dimensional Model

ThermaKin formulation

B

cc

B

Bcc ρjVmj 10

B

cc

Bc

RTjexpj

VJ

10

BenvenvBcnv TtThQ

4inrad

inBrad TtqQ

The random algorithm verification:

Element “in” is selected at

random at each time step

using Beer‐Lambert lawusing Beer Lambert law 

energy distribution as a 

probability density. 

Boundary Conditions for 1-Dimensional Model

ThermaKin formulation

B

cc

B

Bcc ρjVmj 10

B

cc

Bc

RTjexpj

VJ

10

BenvenvBcnv TtThQ

4inrad

inBrad TtqQ

S f fl

comps

cfl

Bc

JJ 1

Surface flame:

,qtqtq flmradrad )()(Element “in” is selected at

random at each time step

using Beer‐Lambert law flmJ flmenvflmenv TtT,hh using Beer Lambert law 

energy distribution as a 

probability density. 

Modeling Cone Calorimetry of PMMAThermaKin predictions

increasin

increasing thickness (3 25 mm)

ng heat flux (223 75 kW

mm-2)

Modeling Cone Calorimetry of HIPSThermaKin predictions

increasin

increasing thickness (3 25 mm)

ng heat flux (223 75 kW

mm-2)

Modeling Cone Calorimetry of PCThermaKin predictions

Flame heat flux = 15 kW m-2.The main mode of heat transfer inside char is radiation. The rate of transfer is defined by a single adjustable parameter.

5 mm PC sample after 160 s at 75 kW m-2.