Upload
joshua-perry
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Re-Shaping Hysteretic Behaviour Using Re-Shaping Hysteretic Behaviour Using Resetable Devices to Customise Structural Resetable Devices to Customise Structural
Response and ForcesResponse and ForcesGeoffrey W RodgersGeoffrey W Rodgers, John B Mander, J Geoffrey Chase, Kerry J Mulligan,, John B Mander, J Geoffrey Chase, Kerry J Mulligan,
Bruce L Deam, and Athol J CarrBruce L Deam, and Athol J Carr
End Cap
Cylinder
Piston
Seal
Device DesignDevice Design
Valvea)
Valves
Cylinder Piston
b)
Cylinder Piston
Independent two chamber design allows broader range of control laws
Overall Customised HysteresisOverall Customised Hysteresis
Only the 2 - 4 control law does not increase base-shear
Viscous Damper
1-4 Resetable
1-3 Resetable
2-4 Resetable
Resist all motion
Resist motionaway from 0
Resist motiontoward 0
Resist all velocity
Semi-Active Resetable Device ModelSemi-Active Resetable Device Model
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
For
ce (
N)
Piston Displacement from Centre Position (mm)
Experimental Test Results
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
For
ce (
N)
Piston Displacement from Centre Position (mm)
Simulink Models
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
For
ce (
N)
Piston Displacement from Centre Position (mm)-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Forc
e (
N)
Piston Displacement from Centre Position (mm)
Simplified Linear ModelSimplified Linear Model
Less computationally expensive, with no anticipatedloss of accuracy or generality
1-3 control 2-4 control
1-4 control
Response SpectraResponse Spectra
Average response spectra for different control laws
How do the different control laws perform relative to one another?
Reduction FactorsReduction Factors
More clearly represent reductions achieved with each control law
Note the apparent invariance to the type of ground motion encountered
Divide results with additional stiffness by the uncontrolled case
Largest reductions seen for the 1-4 device – This device acts over a larger percentage of each cycle and will consequently
have longer active strokes
Suite DependenceSuite DependenceNormalise the average reduction factor from each suite
to the reduction factors for all ground motions to investigate suite dependence
Values close to unity across the spectrum indicates an invariance to the type of ground motion (near field vs. far field) encountered – indicating a robustness of this form of control
Spread of ResultsSpread of Results
Log-normal co-efficient of variation or dispersion factor- Indicates the spread of the results within a ground motion suite- Largest spread is seen for the 1-4 device indicating more variability- Both the 1-3 and 2-4 device show a tighter spread
Structural ForceStructural ForceThe base-shear force for a linear, un-damped structure - Gives an indication of the required column strength
Largest reductions for the 1-4 device – consistent with other metricSimilar performance for the 1-3 and 2-4 devices
Base-ShearBase-ShearThe sum of the structural force and the resetable device force - Gives an indication of the required foundation strength
Only the 2-4 device reduces base shear across the entire spectrum
The 1-3 and 1-4 devices increase base-shear by as much as 60%
The 2-4 device provides similar reductions in displacement and structural force as the 1-3 device, and also reduces base-shear
Control laws comparedControl laws comparedAveraging across suites more clearly indicates
the relative advantage of the control laws
Structural Force Base-Shear Force
1-3 and 2-4 show similar reductions in structural force, but are outperformed by the 1-4 device
Only the 2-4 device reduces base-shear, whereas both the 1-3 and 1-4 increase base-shear by as much as 60%
Displacement Spectral AreaDisplacement Spectral AreaNumerically integrate the area under the response spectra in the seismically
important T = 0.5 to 2.5 second range.
An indication of the average displacement reduction factor in the constant velocity region of the spectra
Fit empirical equations to estimate damping reduction factors
BR /1 wherestructural
resetable
K
KCB 1
where C = 1.43, 1.59, and 5.75 for the 1-3, 2-4 and 1-4 devices
How accurate are these equations?How accurate are these equations?
Re-plot the displacement reduction factors, with the reduction factors from the empirical equations
Although variations can be seen above T = 3.0seconds, equations are appropriate over the constant velocity region from T = 0.5 – 3.0 secs
Black Line is Empirical Equation
ADRS ADRS Acceleration-Displacement Response Spectra
Relate additional resetable stiffness to design guidelines
Empirical reduction factor equations create a “standard design platform” for a structural engineer to safely and
effectively add resetable devices to their design.
SummarySummary
• The 1-4 device outperforms both the 1-3 and 2-4 device for displacement response and structural force as it acts over the full response cycle, has longer active strokes, and consequently higher energy dissipation
• Both the 1-3 and 1-4 devices provide a reduction in structural force and displacement response, but increase base-shear up to 60%
• The 2-4 device reduces both structural force and base-shear
• All three control laws are suite invariant indicating a robustness to the type of ground motion encountered
• Empirical equations to approximate reduction factors allow incorporation into accepted performance based design metrics
ConclusionsConclusions
• Semi-active control enables customisation of overall structural hysteresis in novel ways not available with passive systems
• The most applicable control law (of the selected few presented) depends on the application
• New purpose designed structure • Retrofit application with limited foundation strength• Thus, device selection and implementation is a structural design problem rather
than a control systems problem
• The overall approach presented can be used to develop standard design metrics for any similar novel semi-active or passive systems/devices, thus creating a bridge to the design profession and a greater likelihood of uptake.
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Special thanks to Ms Kerry Mulligan and Professors Special thanks to Ms Kerry Mulligan and Professors Chase and Mander for their assistance with this research, Chase and Mander for their assistance with this research,
as well as to our co-authorsas well as to our co-authors
This research was funded by the NZ Earthquake Commission This research was funded by the NZ Earthquake Commission (EQC) Research Foundation and the New Zealand Tertiary (EQC) Research Foundation and the New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) Bright Futures Top Achievers Education Commission (TEC) Bright Futures Top Achievers
Doctoral Scholarship SchemeDoctoral Scholarship Scheme
SATMD ConceptSATMD Concept
Upper or new stories added as Upper or new stories added as segregated masssegregated mass
Connections are of resetable Connections are of resetable devices and/or rubber bearingsdevices and/or rubber bearings
Use 1-4 devices to resist all motion Use 1-4 devices to resist all motion of upper stories and dissipate max of upper stories and dissipate max energyenergy
Goal 1: use upper stories as tuned Goal 1: use upper stories as tuned massmass
Goal 2: reduce displacements and Goal 2: reduce displacements and thus shears in lower storiesthus shears in lower stories
How to tune?How to tune?
Tuning and MethodTuning and Method Easy assumptionEasy assumption = tune to 1 = tune to 1stst mode as with passive TMD (PTMD) mode as with passive TMD (PTMD) Better assumptionBetter assumption = tune lower than first mode to enhance motion = tune lower than first mode to enhance motion
of device and thus the energy dissipatedof device and thus the energy dissipated Set SATMD stiffness to PTMD/5 (one fifth of stiffness)Set SATMD stiffness to PTMD/5 (one fifth of stiffness) Anything under PTMD/2 works pretty much equally wellAnything under PTMD/2 works pretty much equally well
MethodMethod:: Run suites of earthquakes and develop spectra (SAC project motions)Run suites of earthquakes and develop spectra (SAC project motions) Compare PTMD with SATMD using 100% resetable devicesCompare PTMD with SATMD using 100% resetable devices Use 20% of lower stories as SATMD/PTMD massUse 20% of lower stories as SATMD/PTMD mass Present 16Present 16thth, 50, 50thth and 84 and 84thth percentile results percentile results Assume optimal tuning in PTMD for most conservative comparisonAssume optimal tuning in PTMD for most conservative comparison All results presented as All results presented as reduction factorsreduction factors of base structure (y1) motion of base structure (y1) motion
as compared to uncontrolled case and presented as a percentage (%)as compared to uncontrolled case and presented as a percentage (%) Re-run some suites with Re-run some suites with non-linearnon-linear structure for more realistic case structure for more realistic case
Linear Spectra ResultsLinear Spectra Results
SATMD is much narrower than PTMDSATMD is much narrower than PTMD All SATMD values < 100%All SATMD values < 100% PTMD highly variable over suitesPTMD highly variable over suites Differences are greatest in 1-3 second Differences are greatest in 1-3 second
range of greatest interest for earthquakesrange of greatest interest for earthquakes Again, optimal PTMD tuning is usedAgain, optimal PTMD tuning is used
Low
High
Medium
Non-Linear ResultsNon-Linear Results Only low suite for most Only low suite for most
common eventscommon events Use Bouc-Wen model for Use Bouc-Wen model for
structural non-linearitystructural non-linearity
Similar results overall to Similar results overall to linear spectra caselinear spectra case
PTMD even wider over PTMD even wider over suite with realistic structuresuite with realistic structure
SATMD only a little widerSATMD only a little wider SATMD < 100% still even at SATMD < 100% still even at
8484thth percentile percentile
SATMD SummarySATMD Summary Concept shows significant promise in an area that may grow as Concept shows significant promise in an area that may grow as
developers and others seek to go upwardsdevelopers and others seek to go upwards Provides a novel way to obtain TMD like results without added massProvides a novel way to obtain TMD like results without added mass SATMD tuning does not require knowledge of exact masses or SATMD tuning does not require knowledge of exact masses or
exact first mode frequency, as with standard passive PTMD. exact first mode frequency, as with standard passive PTMD. Therefore, it is very easy to design tuningTherefore, it is very easy to design tuning
PTMD results are very wide and do not always reduce response – PTMD results are very wide and do not always reduce response – even with optimal tuning to first mode!even with optimal tuning to first mode!
Reduction factor results, as presented for spectra over suites of Reduction factor results, as presented for spectra over suites of events can be modelled to obtain design equations and integrate events can be modelled to obtain design equations and integrate into standard design methodsinto standard design methods
Approach is basically the same as presented for directly controlled Approach is basically the same as presented for directly controlled structures in prior workstructures in prior work