1
Neurourology and Urodynamics 25:307 (2006) EDITORIAL COMMENT Re: Dalpiaz O, Curti P. 2006. Role of Perineal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Urinary Stress Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Neurourol Urodynam 25:301^306 Ultrasound of the bladder has been introduced into female urology in the mid-¢fties of the last century. However it lasted another 30 years, since its routine application in that ¢eld. Compared to conventional radiological procedures ultra- sound lacks side e¡ects, especially radiation exposure, a time limiting factor especially for dynamic assessment of the lower urogenital tract. Nowadays, the term pelvic £oor ultrasound comprises imaging of the female lower urogenital tract, the pelvic £oor and the anorectal region. High-resolution techniques have been developed nowa- days, giving similar good resolution compared with MRI. Perineal and introital ultrasound have been introduced in the assessment of female urinary incontinence and pelvic £oor disorders, due to their advantageous ability to scan the blad- der, the urethra, the anorectal region and various structures of the pelvic £oor at the same time. Moreover, dynamic changes of these structures can be obtained without time limit resulting in functional assessment and interaction of pelvic structures in conjunction with other investigational techniques, for example, urodynamics. Many studies have been published so far, dealing with various quantitative concepts to measure urogenital and pelvic £oor defects. The German Society of Urogynecology has published recommen- dations to carry out sonography of the lower female urogenital tract in order to increase reproducibility of the data obtained by these various techniques. Qualitative and quantitative measures have been established, but still a profound process of evaluation and further research is needed. Availability of ultrasound instruments in many institutions was one of the supportive factors which helped sonography ¢nding its widespread use in many urogynecological institu- tions. New concepts and novel techniques, such as 3-D and 4-D ultrasound are under investigation and further clinically relevant results are awaited. Heinz Koelbl, MD* Johannes-GutenbergUniversityMainz Mainz,Germany No con£ict of interest reported by the author(s). The views expressed in editorials and editorial comments are not necessarily representative of the views of the International Continence Society, the Society for Urodynamics & Female Urology, or the Publisher. *Correspondence to: Heinz Koelbl, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaeco- logy, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeck Strasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Published online 7 July 2006 inWiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/nau.20310 ß 2006Wiley-Liss,Inc.

Re: Dalpiaz O, Curti P. 2006. Role of Perineal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Urinary Stress Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Neurourol Urodynam 25:301–306

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Neurourology and Urodynamics 25:307 (2006)

EDITORIALCOMMENT

Re: Dalpiaz O, Curti P. 2006. Role of Perineal Ultrasound in theEvaluation of Urinary Stress Incontinence and Pelvic Organ

Prolapse: A Systematic Review. Neurourol Urodynam 25:301^306

Ultrasound of the bladder has been introduced into femaleurology in the mid-¢fties of the last century. However it lastedanother 30 years, since its routine application in that ¢eld.Compared to conventional radiological procedures ultra-sound lacks side e¡ects, especially radiation exposure, a timelimiting factor especially for dynamic assessment of the lowerurogenital tract. Nowadays, the term pelvic £oor ultrasoundcomprises imaging of the female lower urogenital tract, thepelvic £oor and the anorectal region.

High-resolution techniques have been developed nowa-days, giving similar good resolution compared with MRI.Perineal and introital ultrasound have been introduced in theassessment of female urinary incontinence and pelvic £oordisorders, due to their advantageous ability to scan the blad-der, the urethra, the anorectal region and various structuresof the pelvic £oor at the same time. Moreover, dynamicchanges of these structures can be obtained without timelimit resulting in functional assessment and interaction ofpelvic structures in conjunction with other investigationaltechniques, for example, urodynamics. Many studies have

been published so far, dealing with various quantitativeconcepts to measure urogenital and pelvic £oor defects. TheGerman Society of Urogynecology has published recommen-dations to carry out sonography of the lower female urogenitaltract in order to increase reproducibility of the data obtainedby these various techniques. Qualitative and quantitativemeasures have been established, but still a profound processof evaluation and further research is needed.Availability of ultrasound instruments in many institutions

was one of the supportive factors which helped sonography¢nding its widespread use in many urogynecological institu-tions.New concepts and novel techniques, such as 3-D and 4-D

ultrasound are under investigation and further clinicallyrelevant results are awaited.

HeinzKoelbl, MD*Johannes-GutenbergUniversityMainz

Mainz,Germany

No con£ict of interest reported by the author(s).The views expressed in editorials and editorial comments are not necessarilyrepresentative of the views of the International Continence Society, theSociety for Urodynamics & FemaleUrology, or the Publisher.*Correspondence to: Heinz Koelbl, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaeco-logy, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeck Strasse 1, 55131Mainz, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] online 7 July 2006 inWiley InterScience(www.interscience.wiley.com)DOI 10.1002/nau.20310

�2006Wiley-Liss, Inc.