Upload
abuzar-tabassum
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
1/37
Frank R. Leslie,
B. S. E. E., M. S. Space Technology, LS IEEE
2/2/2010, Rev. 2.0.2
fleslie @fit.edu; (321) 674-7377
www.fit.edu/~fleslie
7.0 Nuclear Energy
FPLs St. Lucie Nuclear Plant
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
2/37
In Other News . . . ~1/25/2010
Crude oil at $73 due to demand destruction, that isdemand has dropped due to layoffs, plant closings,consumer lack of confidence
When the economy improves, more demand willdrive prices up
Energy Act of 2009 or 2010 may be revisited soon
Nuclear fission/fusion hybrid reactor investigation ofspent fuel reduction (transuranic wastes)
Florida Public Service Commission denies rate increasesleading to FPL and Progress Energy stopping plans fornuclear power plant additions
100128
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
3/37
Nuclear energy was once gushingly said to be too cheap to
meter in the future (the meter and reading it would costmore than the electricity would sell for)
That isnt close to happening 50 years later and is not likely now
Think of the economics of having a flat rate for electricity!
US commercial nuclear power began at Shippingport PA in1957; Soviets began in 1954
Nuclear power supplied ~20% of US energy in 2005
Nuclear energy is cheap to the consumer; but heavilysubsidized by the Federal Government (only taxpayers pay
for that!) Great controversy (among some) about dangers and eventual
doom from spent fuel
Plants will likely be built again after none since 1978(?)
Developing countries considering/building nuclear power
7.0 Overview of Nuclear Energy
090129
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
4/37
7.0 About This Presentation
7.1 Nuclear Reactions 7.2 Sources
7.3 Reactor Types
7.4 Fuel Cycle and Spent Fuel
7.5 Reprocessing of Spent Fuel
7.6 Safety Record
7.7 Risk Assessment
7.8 Conflicts and Controversy
7.9 Advantages and Disadvantages
7.10 Degree of Nuclear Use 7.11 Shutdown Scenario
7.12 Future Trends
7 Conclusion
090129
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
5/37
92
n +235
U143p236
U144p144
Ba88 +89
Kr53 + 3n + 176.9 MeV
n = 1.0086789Kr = 88.91660144Ba = 143.92000235U= 235.04394236U = 236.05261
365692
Neutron
89Kr
144Ba
Fission occurs when uranium atom is split into atomsof lesser atomic weight plus emitted energy
7.1 The Nuclear Fission Reaction
100128
Gamma
Ray
235U
85 to 104 a.w.
130 to 149 a.w.
Fission
Clumping
GammaRay
Gamma
Ray
Neutron
Neutron
92
[After Ristinen, p. 174]
236U
235U143
Protons
At. No., Z
Mass no., nucleons=
protons + neutrons
Neutrons
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
6/37
Nuc lide Tab le Example
235U92
236U92
238U92
236Pa91
236Th90
238Th90
236Ac89
Rows ar Atomic mber, ol mns are ass mber, A
7.1 The Nuclides and Radiation Decay
A beta particle emission moves up to the next element;an alpha emission moves down and left
These tables also have another format, Z vs. N
238U is common; 235U is required for fission
090129
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
7/37
7.2 Sources, extraction, and preparation
Found in Congo, Canada, US (CO, WY, UT, NM, etc.), Africa,Ukraine, and everywhere to some extent
Uranium mining of ore
US carnotite contains 238U, 99.28%; 235U, 0.71%; and 234U,0.006%
Uranium extractionConvert raw ore to uranium oxide (U3O8) or yellowcake
~$15.50/lb to $43.00 (2010) http://www.uxc.com/review/uxc_Prices.aspx
Convert that yellowcake to uranium hexafluoride gas
Enrich the 235U from 0.7% up to 2% to 5% for power plants;
93% for weapons (lots of centrifuges [Iran has 6000] in series) Uranium fuel preparation
Make uranium dioxide pellets (~0.4 inch diam x 0.4 inch long)
Load the pellets end-to-end in a zirconium alloy tube
Place tubes in assemblies for ease of handling and loading
100125
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
8/37
7.3 Types of Reactors
Major Reactor Categories:
Light Water Reactors (LWR) use H2O
Heavy Water Reactors (HWR) use D2O or deuterium oxide
Canadian CANDU (Canadian deuterium oxide) reactor
Boiling water reactors produce steam at top of the core area
Pressurized water reactors keep water from boilingMixed oxide (MOX) reactors contain both plutonium and
uranium oxides (make from old warheads)
Breeder reactors produce additional radioactive fuel that maybe used in conventional reactors (recyclable?)
Ft. Vrain CO HTG reactor shut down and converted to anatural gas plant
Fusion Reactors (based upon hydrogen) 2H2 into helium, 1He4Cold Fusion (Univ. of Utah mistake or worse?) could not be
replicated by anyone!
090129
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
9/37
7.3.1 Light Water Reactors
Ordinary, but pure, deionized (noncorrosive) water isused as a fuel core coolant
Some reactors have used liquid sodium metal as acoolant with a heat exchanger
The coolant flows around the fuel elements and carriesoff the heat
Heat exchangers prevent leakage of the radioactivewater into the steam turbines
The primary side water remains in liquid state due tohigh pressure
If the water area vents and goes dry, the core canmelt if the reaction isnt stopped in time (the ChinaSyndrome)
100125
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
10/37
7.3.1.1 St. Lucie Plant on Hutchinson Island FL
1680 MW Servicesmuch ofEasternFlorida
Oceanwatercooling exitsto lagoon On barrierislandsubject tohurricanewave
overwash090129
http://www.fmpa.com/html/power_supply/st_lucie.html
Uprating will take it to 2400 MW
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
11/37
7.3.2 Boiling Water Reactors (BWR)
Boiling water reactors have part of the water as steam around the fuel
The water acts as a moderator to slow the neutrons to fission the uranium, while thesteam is less dense and doesnt moderate well
If overheating occurs, the steam pushes the water level lower, slows the reaction and is
protects the reactor090124
www.nrc.gov
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
12/37
7.3.3 Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR)
Water is under high pressureso it cant flash into steam
The reaction is modifiedentirely by the control rods
040202http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation/vessel-head-degradation-files/pwr-rx-vessel.html
www.nrc.gov
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
13/37
7.3.4 CANDU Reactor
The Canadian heavy water (deuterium oxide, DO2)reactor can use unrefined uranium U238 as fuel
Canada, Argentina, and Pakistan use this reactor type
This avoids the expense of uranium enhancement, but
deuterium oxide must be separated from ordinary waterDeuterium occurs about once in 6500 molecules of
water
090124
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
14/37
7.3.5 Mixed Oxide Reactor
http://www.fepc.or.jp/english/nuclear_power/cycle/thermal.html090124
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
15/37
7.3.6 Pebble-bed; Breeder reactor
Pebble-bed reactors use fuel/carbon/ceramic pelletssized like a billiard ball
The balls can be pushed through pipes into thereactor on top and removed at the bottom, thus noshutdowns are required; refueling is continuous
Breeder reactors produce more fissile fuel than theyconsume
The US (under Pres. Carters administration)presently prohibits breeder reactors because ofpotential weapons that could be made
President Bush was considering using breederreactors; President Obama decided against them
Without breeder reactors, uranium ore may bedepleted in ~50 - 80 years
100201
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
16/37
Hydrogen can be fused into helium yielding more energythan was required to create the fusion
The Shiva machine (named after the multiple-armedIndian Goddess) has 20 lasers that simultaneously strikea small plastic shell containing deuterium oxide to create
fusionImmense amounts of energy fire the 20 lasers
simultaneously to cause a negligible amount of fusionenergy
Remember EROEI, where a high
amount of energy must come outcompared to what went in for theconversion to be useful, but thisis the reverse so far
7.3.7 Fusion Reactors
090130
www.llnl.govhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_laser
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
17/37
7.3.7.1 New Fission/Fusion Reactor Studied
Compact Fusion Neutron SourceA new fusion-fission hybrid pairs
nuclearfission reactors with a
fusion reactor neutron source to
eliminate virtually all of their
waste and produce clean power,even with olderfission reactor
designs. (Source: Angela
Wong/University ofTexas at
Austin)
www.dailytech.com/New+FusionF
ission+System+Invented+Promis
es+Clean+Nuclear+Power/article
14081.htm
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
18/37
7.4 The Fuel Cycle and the Spent Fuel Problem
Conventional reactors require 18-month refueling to remove 1/3
spent fuel and replace it with active fuel Spent fuel must be reprocessed to make more active fuel or be
stored in isolationNewly removed fuel is lowered into water tanks to allow
radioactivity to diminish safely with time ~2 years Intense radiation causes the blue luminescence of the
Cherenkov Effect; thus I claim nuclear-generated hydrogenis blue (fossil=black, wind or sun=green)
After several years, the fuel assemblies can be removed andplaced in casks for dry storage on site or elsewhere
A National Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada intended toreceive fuel transported by train and truck
Not many voters in the lowest population state, but one isSen. Reid, the Democrat majority leader, who is blockingstorage there
This project is now dead (wasted effort and materials)
100125
www.bnl.gov
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
19/37
7.4.1 Spent Fuel Diversion & Nuclear Weapons
In the FSU, there is concern that nuclear material may be diverted to
criminal or terrorist purposes
Nuclear weapons
Fission
Two subcritical masses are pushed together to critical mass
A surround of explosive detonates to compress the core to dense
critical mass Fusion
Atomic explosion initiates hydrogen fusion bomb
Electromagnetic Pulse Weapon
High altitude burst radiates EMP and damages electrical and
electronic equipment by induced voltage overload Neutron Bomb
Neutron pulse kills without building destruction [Jack Welch, GE]
Contamination by Dirty Bomb
Radioactive materials are spread by conventional explosive to causeterror and decontamination delays; more psychological effect
090124
Now I am become death, the destroyerof
worlds. Vishnu in Bhagavad Gita
- Robert Oppenheimer at the Trinity Site
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
20/37
7.5 Reprocessing (Dilution)
The US buys excess nuclear weapon warhead materials fromRussia to reduce danger of leakage to terrorists
Reprocesses (mixes) the plutonium with uranium spentfuel to form reusable fuel that would be hard to separatefor future weapons use (remember the centrifuges?)
Reduces diversion or sale to terrorists or evil-doersTheyll buy from North Korea or Iran instead
Now, the problem is not traditional weapons but thecheap Dirty Bomb; processing is stirring and mixing
High explosive mixed with radioactive waste explodesto cast radioactive particles over a wide area
The degree of radioactivity isnt important (oldradioactive gloves and such would do), since terroristsseek terror, not necessarily death and injury
100125
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
21/37
7.6 Safety Record
US plants have a good safety recordThe Three-Mile Island gas venting event caused
disruption and evacuation, but no deaths or injuries
Core breaching or meltdown would have made this afar worse event! Very close to that happening
Chernobyl had a poor design that is not used in the US
31 died, and 35,000 (?) were predicted to have longterm radiation poisoning; cities relocated
Radioactivity released into the air was detected inNorway
Safety inspectors must report to the highest level oforganization; resident Federal inspectors must bepresent to check the commercial inspectors
070130
www.grida.no & AMAP
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
22/37
7.6.1 Radioactive Plume Blown to NW
www.grida.no & AMAP 090124
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
23/37
7.6.1.1 Three Mile Island, PA
Unit 2 still closed and defueled
Cemented in to seal it
100125
http://www.solcomhouse.com/tmi.htm
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
24/37
7.6.2 Boric Acid Problem near Lake Erie, OH
060127
Boric acid (moderator) leaks were found under insulation; now fixed
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
25/37
7.7 Risk Assessment (from Failure Analysis)
Risk assessment estimates the probable loss from varioussources and is based upon failure analysis
Risk = Probability of damage x dollar consequence of damage
Dropped Light Bulb Scenario:
Prob(event) = 1 in 1000 (guess based upon experience)
C = $0.37/bulb (in four-packs)
Risk = P x C = 0.001 x $0.37 = $0.00037 (skip insurance)
Armageddon (Bruce Willis) meteor strikes Pacific Ocean:
P = 10-12/year (wipes out Earth; my guess)
C = $10+24 (my wild guess; whats yours?)
Risk = $10+12/year (should we spend this $1 trillionannually to attempt to prevent disaster? How?)
Total all risks and rank them high $ to low $ for examination
100128
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
26/37
7.8 Conflicts and Controversy
Basic Anti-Nuc, Anti-war ideology drives protesters who have aseparate progressive/liberal/leftist agenda [in my humble opinion]
Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings ended World War II with lessloss of life than continuing the war
Anti-war activists attack nuclear energy and food preservationradiation for civilian use (Mulberry, Florida)
Cassini launch to Saturn was vociferously protested because ofthe 72.3 lb 238Pu radioisotope power source (invaded CCAFB andwere arrested); New Horizons launch was protested as well
Yucca Mt., NV attacked for seismic activity, heat, not good enoughfor 250,000 years storage of isotopes
Possibly future generations might recover the waste and changethe storage in 1000 years?
Safe or not? By what scoring? Who decides? Obama did, andstopped the project by executive order
100128
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
27/37
7.9 Advantages and Disadvantages
AdvantagesLow-cost electricity
due to Govt subsidies,services, & insurance
Provides baseloadconstant power tocarry most of the load
Clean power withoutair pollution (no CO2?)
Requires highly paidwork force (job votes)
Source of localtaxation revenue
DisadvantagesPotential for radiation
leakage and healtheffects
Possible terroristtarget
Useful just asthreat
Apparent cheap power
retards renewableenergy development
What to do with thespent fuel?
090124
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
28/37
7.10 Degree of Nuclear Use
Nuclear plants provide so much energy (~20%) thatthey cannot be discontinued quickly; replacementpower would be required first at high cost
Nuclear power primarily has a political problem and isopposed by strident antinuclear activists/protesters
Condo owner organizations next to St. Lucie Plantspoke in favor of relicensing citing Good Neighbor!
Miami area anti-nuke activist drew attention topotential fire in spent fuel pool if cooling water level
fell and pellet zirconium cladding fire resulted, thusspreading radiation
US nuclear plant construction likely to start againsince population growth demands more energy, and
natural gas prices will be higher in the future 070130
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
29/37
7.10 US nuclear reactors are near user load centers
090124http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/reactor/
Note reactors in Pres. Obamas home state of Illinois
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
30/37
7.11 Shutdown Scenario for Anti-Nucs
Why not close down reactors right now? ! ?
Likely scenario that would follow:
Utilities warn public to cut energy use 20% immediately!
Public ignores warning; consumes as usual
Nuclear generators are taken off the Grid by law on stop date
Immediate Grid overload occurs (~20% of energy missing)
Electricity outages occur simultaneously across the entirecountry, not just as in the past Northeast states disruptions
Electric lighting, communication, refrigeration, trains, elevators,traffic lights, gas pumps, oxygen generators, etc. fail to operate
Back-up diesel generators use up reserve fuel in days
Civilization as we know it drops back to the 1700s, but withoutthe appropriate conveniences they were using back then
As widespread hunger spreads, pillaging mobs kill for food (andTVs), while soldiers shoot looters by thousands
So should we shut off nuclear reactors immediately?
100125
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
31/37
7.12 Future Trends in Nuclear Energy
Older plants (>40 years) must seek relicensing fromthe NRC to continue operation
The St. Lucie Nuclear Plant at Ft. Pierce FL wasrecently granted a 20-year license extension
Standardized plant designs speed construction and
increase safety; use additional reactor units asneeded
Nuclear energy will increase in the less-developedcountries in order to have long-term energy
Some countries may desire to create nuclear
weapons at the same time; e.g., North Korea,Iran?
Fusion reactors may become useful in the future butyears of research have only yielded less energy thanwas put in to the process --- I like our fusion sun!
100125
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
32/37
7.12.1 Future Trends in Nuclear Energy (Cont)
ITER (Latin for The Way, I T E Reactor)Produce 0.5 GW for 400 seconds!
Fuse deuterium and tritium to make H2 and emit aneutron
Seven countries researching fusion energy
Tokamak accelerator
Goal is >10 units of energy out for each unit in
Perhaps demo ready between 2030 to 2035 http://www.iter.org/default.aspx
http://www.pppl.gov/polImage.cfm?doc_Id=48&size_code=Doc
100202
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
33/37
7.C Conclusion
Nuclear plants provide a significant 20% of US energy
Some antinuclear organizations want all plants closedright now and vocally oppose them
Nuclear energy provides too much energy to readily
close them without a substitute (~1600 MW/plant) Nuclear energy may be a transitional approach from
fission plants to fusion plants some far away day
Nuclear plants likely will be built again since population
growth demands more energy, natural gas prices will behigher in the future, and fossil fuel plants pollute
Wind energy is the closest renewable, since majorhydro is difficult (see Chinas Three Gorges Dam)
060127
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
34/37
Olin Engineering Complex 4.7 kW Solar PV Roof Array
080116
Questions?
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
35/37
7.B References: Books
Glasstone, Samuel. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. 1950 out of print, ~$315.
Brower, Michael. Cool Energy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1992. 0-262-02349-0,TJ807.9.U6B76, 333.7940973.
Duffie, John and William A. Beckman. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 920 pp., 1991
Gipe, Paul. Wind Energy for Home & Business. White River Junction, VT: ChelseaGreen Pub. Co., 1993. 0-930031-64-4, TJ820.G57, 621.45
Patel, Mukund R. Wind and Solar Power Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999, 351pp. ISBN 0-8493-1605-7, TK1541.P38 1999, 621.312136
Srensen, Bent. Renewable Energy, Second Edition. San Diego: Academic Press,2000, 911 pp. ISBN 0-12-656152-4.
070130
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
36/37
7.R References: Websites, etc.
www.energyquest.ca.gov/story/chapter13.html
http://fsv.homestead.com/FSVHistory.htmlhttp://eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/nuc_reactors/superla.htmlhttp://www.fpl.com/environment/nuclear/nuclear_power_serves_you.shtml
______________________________________________________________
__
mailto:[email protected]
www.dieoff.org. Site devoted to the decline ofenergy and effects uponpopulation
www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
www.google.com/search?q=%22renewable+energy+course%22
solstice.crest.org/
dataweb.usbr.gov/html/powerplant_selection.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power
100202
8/7/2019 Re 070 Nuclear
37/37
Slide stockpile follows!
Older slides follow this one.Look at these ifyou have
interest or time. Its difficult
to decide what to leave outofthe lecture to save time!