Upload
damola2real
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
project management and financial analysis
Citation preview
Rates of ReturnConstruction Engineering 221Economic Analysis
Rates of ReturnROR stand for Rate of return- it is the effective annual interest rate earned on an investmentROI is Return on Investment is NOT stated as a dollar amount in financial analysis. The book is wrong on this. They are using ROI as a substitute for net present value (NPV)The key is to know what you are comparing- present value or interest rate earned
Rates of ReturnMinimum attractive rate of return (MARR) is the lowest ROR at which a company will consider investingMARR is not usually used in calculating, only in comparing. It is the do nothing option
Rates of ReturnExampleOption 1 ROR = 12.5%Option 2 ROR = 11.875%Option 3 = 10.5%MARR = 15%The company would choose not to invest
Rates of ReturnMARR is not usually stated as an option, it is a constraint or decision criteria that applies to all investment considerationsTypical decision conditions for X alternatives:Interest rate is given (a developers borrowing rate or MARR or risk adjusted rate for each alternative)Cash flows are predicted pro forma for each alternativeDurations are given (lease periods or equipment life) for each alternative
Rates of ReturnCalculate NPV for each option and choose the best (highest value)Example- three options for acquiring a piece of heavy equipment
Rates of ReturnOption 1- balloon lease pay $50,000 now and then $50 per hour for each hour used (pay lump sum at end of the lease period)Option 2 - net lease- pay $20,000 up front and then $10,000 per month for three years, lessee pays all maintenanceOption 3- triple net- pay $10,000 up front and the $8,000 per month to the lessee and pay maintenance costs which are estimated at $1000 per month to begin, increasing $100 per month
Rates of ReturnAssume you will need the equipment on the project for three years, and you estimate 1500 hours per year in usage. MARR is 8%Option 1 NPV = 50,000 + {50 X 1500 X 3}[P/F, 8, 3)Option 1 NPV= 50,000 + {225,000 X .7938}, OR $228, 605
Rates of ReturnOption 2 NPV = 20,000 + 120,000 (P/A, 8, 3), or 20,000 + {120,000 X 2.5771}Option 2 NPV = 329,252Option 3 NPV = 10,000 + 96,000 (P/A, 8,3) + 12,000(P/A, 8,3) +1200 (P/G, 8, 3) OR10,000 + 96,000 X 2.5771 + 12,000 X 2.5771 + 1200 X 2.4450 = 291,265
Rates of ReturnSince these are all disbursements, choose the lowest NPV, or option 1. If the project goes slow and the equipment will be needed for more than 1500 hours per year, the risk is higher for overrunsFrom the lessees standpoint, they are taking the least risk on option 1 and the most risk on option 2, so the NPVs reflect that risk/ return tradeoff