34
RAPID COMPRESSION MACHINE Computational model by Fluent N. Loveldi, X.Gao, A. Marchese,

Rapid compression machine_monthly meeting

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation

Rapid compression machineComputational model by Fluent

N. Loveldi, X.Gao, A. Marchese,

Outline

What is RCM?

RCM stroke

MotivationCetane numberGold StandardUltimately Cetane number is an indication what is the quality of ignition delayCompared Mixture of n-cetane(left) and 1-methylaphthalene(right),Every fuel has different ignition time, so why do we compare it with only 2 reference fuels?

Ignition Delay

Time required for fuels to evaporate (if liquid) and diffuse before it reactsCan be defined as Temperature inflection pointFor Compression Ignition

Ignition delay

How do we measure Ignition Delay?What we want is a 0-D chamber (homogeneous) that can instantly raise the temperature and pressure. (impossible)This is where RCM comes in If we cant do it instantly, lets do it as fast as we canProblems with RCM:It is not instant, so there is a very high pace movement that might cause non-homogeneity It is not adiabatic, which cause temperature gradient

Our Job is to figure out how non-uniform it is? And if it is non-uniform, where does the combustion actually starts?

How did we do it? Case Setup Drawings of Piston Head

crevisshaft

Piston head surface

Case SetupMesh

Edge sizing structured mesh for dynamic layeringUnstructured meshQuality:N of cells =17922Orthogonal(min) = 0.796Aspect ratio(max)= 10.95AxisymmetricClear ?

Case SetupPiston Velocity profileExperiment displacement data

Total time ~ 42 msDisplacement ~157mm

Case Setup

Case SetupPiston Velocity profile result

At the end of 42 ms, dynamic mesh is turned off to avoid sinusoidal motion

Adiabatic caseNon-reactiveLaminar ModelHeat flux to wall = 0Green-Gauss node basedInitial conditions:P = 25000 Pa (experiments)T = 288 K (experiments)No fuel

Adiabatic CasePressure vs time

Temperature vs time

Adiabatic CasePressure Contour @ 21ms

Temperature Contour @ 21 ms

As we expected, both temperature and pressure are homogeneous

Adiabatic CaseVelocity contour at 91 ms

What we want to show is that there is a movement of fluid inside the cylinder long after the end of stroke which show non-homogeneity

Isotherm CaseNon-reactiveLaminar ModelIsotherm wall at 300K with 10mm wall thicknessGreen-Gauss node basedInitial conditions:P = 25000 Pa (experiments)T = 288 K (experiments)No fuel

Pressure Plot

Experimental Pressure plotFluentMax Pressure ~ 2.5MPaAt 27msMax Pressure ~ 2.5MpaAt 35msIsotherm model is a good representation of the experimental case,

Temperature Plot

This is a good case representation because We clearly see the heat transfer from the decreasing temperature after 42 ms

Temperature Contour Isotherm21 ms42 ms63 msMax = 375KMin = 300 KMax = 1030KMin = 302 KMax = 974KMin = 300 K

Temperature ProfileWhat did we see?It is definitely not homogeneousThere are some temperature vortexBoundary Layer might be thin enough for approximation?

Velocity Contour Isotherm21 ms42 ms

35 msMax = 10.4 m/sMin = 0 m/sMax = 29 m/sMin = 0 m/sMax = 17.4 m/sMin = 0 m/s

Velocity ProfileThe Crevis on the piston was created to reduce vortex in the main cylinder and distributing it into another chamberIt is consistent with the adiabatic case.

Combustion of single step Hydrogen

Combustion of single step HydrogenTemp vs timePressure vs time

Contour of Temperature

Contour of H2O

Contour of H2

Contour of H2

Conclusion from CombustionVery Inaccurate because it reacts at 300 KThis is where I got stuck because CSU does not have the license for pre-processor of detail chemistry inputs from Chem-KinHowever, there are something that can be learned from hereWe know now that the combustion does not start everywhere at the same timeWe are able to see where is the flame propagating by the consumption of hydrogen fuel

Future WorkDetail Chemistry inputs for the whole mechanism should give us a better resultsSimulation Using Converge

Can RCM really be used as a good measurement to find a standardized ignition delay?

Referencehttp://www.eecl.colostate.edu/facility/equipment.php?equipment=7J. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Kazakov, F.L. Dryer, Int. J. Chem.Kinet. 36 (2004) 566575.Computational fluid dynamics modeling of hydrogenignition in a rapid compression machineGaurav Mittal , Mandhapati P. Raju, Chih-Jen Sung