Ranking Methology

7/31/2019 Ranking Methology

1/16

cover story

ICMR conducted the perception survey intwo phases:THE FIRST PHASE: In the frst phase

o the survey, ICMR generated a list o 500B-schools across India. The list o B-schools

was prepared based on a secondary studyconducted by ICMR. The 500 B-schools

were divided according to geographicalzones, i.e. North, South, East and West.(Masscom institutes & institutes oeringonly 1 year certifed courses have not been

covered under the purview o the survey).The list was then circulated amongst a selectset o 25 B-schools proessors (having work/industry experience o at least 5 years) toname Indias Cult Status B-schools. Then,

a list o the top 30 B-schools named by these25 B-school proessors (based on the re-quency o responses) was generated.

SECOND PHASE: In this phase each othe 30 B-schools were urther scrutinizedbased on the ollowing parameters:l

Global Exposure: which included ele-ments like student/aculty exchange pro-grammes, international linkages,et al;

l Fun Factor: which included elementslike debates, quizzes and other manage-ment based activities;

l Course Contents: which included ele-ments like the number o subjects/papers,

regular upgradation o syllabus,et al;l Faculty: which included elements like

student/aculty ratio, total number o per-manent/visiting aculty members, acultymembers with relevant industry experi-ence,et al;

l Inrastructure: which included ele-ments like campus area/location, numbero classrooms, library, wi-f campus, lap-top acilities, caeteria,et al;

l Personality Development: which in-cluded elements like overall personalitydevelopment, role plays and presentations,

enhancing communication skills,et al;l Student Profles/Admissions: includ-

ing elements like student qualifcation,background, age distribution,et al;

l Research and Writings: including ele-ments like internal journals published,newsletters/magazines/books published,aculty contribution,et al;

lIndustry Interace: including elementslike number o Management Develop-ment Programmes/ Executive Develop-ment Programmes/seminars, joint corpo-rate training workshops, projects under-taken with corporations,et al;

l Placement and Packages: includingelements like number o students placedeach year, domestic/international place-ments, maximum salary (both domestic

and international), number o companies both domestic and international visit-ing the campus,et al;

lAlumni: elements like alumni profle/

strength, alumni meets, career pathstaken by the alumni, alumni network andassociation,et al;

l Parental Perspective: including paren-tal perspective on respective B-schools.

The respondents or the parameters givenabove were students, aculty members, par-ents and corporations, primarily rom theHR departments (as they recruit and interact

most with B-school graduates) and CMOs(Chie Marketing Ofcers). The parameters

were divided amongst the respondents onthe basis o relevance. However, the ratingsor parameters o inrastructure and aculty

were collected both rom students and ac-ulty members.

The sample size o students interviewedpan-India, was around 800. Students coveredunder the purview o the study were primar-ily current management students and man-agement graduates. Faculty members o

esteemed organisations such as IMT (Gha-ziabad), IIT-D (Delhi), IIFT and otherswere interviewed on the parameters o Fac-ulty, Inrastructure, Course Content andResearch and Writings. Apart rom this,ICMR also conducted interviews with thecorporate HR&CMO raternity to gain in-puts on the parameters o Industry Interace,Placement &Packages and Alumni. Theindustry/HR proessionals and CMOs cov-ered under the research were rom wellknown organisations in the industries obanking &fnancial services, automobiles,telecom, retail, inormation technology, con-sulting and various others.

Each o the above mentioned respondentswere asked to rate the top 30 B-schools onrespective parameters on a scale o 1-10 (1being worst & 10 being best). The fnal rank-ing is based on the cumulative mean scoreon each o the parameters. However, sincethe parameters o aculty&inrastructure

were both rated by students &aculty mem-bers, we have shown the cumulative scores.The parameter o parental perspective wasrated by parents o students who have pur-sued or are currently pursuing a manage-ment course.

A separate perception sur vey was con-ducted by ICMR amongst management stu-dents to identiy the Power B-schools apartrom the Cult Status B-schools as mentionedabove. Students were shown a list o 100 B-schools (excluding the top 30 Cult Status B-

schools as ranked in the ollowing pages) andthen asked to name their most preerred B-

schools. The students were also asked to ratethe B-school named by them on a scale o1-5 (1 being worst and 5 being best). Basedon the overall perception scores ICMR gen-erated (with institutes being rated a minimum

score o 3 on the Likert Scale) the list o 70Power B-schools. 4Ps

The PROCeSS UTILISeD BY ICMR (InDIan COUnCIL fOR MaRkeT ReSeaRCh) fOR ThePeRCePTIOn ReSeaRCh SURveY On InDIaS BeST B-SChOOLS On BehaLf Of 4Ps B&M

Rsarch Mthodology

A few criticAl pArAmeters on which the inDiAn institUte of plAnninG AnD mAnAGement ( iipm) wAs rAteD DUrinG the seconD phAse

pArAmeters GloBAleXposUre

plAcement &pAcKAGes

personAlityDevelopment

reseArch &writinGs

AlUmni coUrsecontent

infrAstrUctUre

perception score 9.50 9.00 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.00

Not: Th Inin Institt of Pnnin n Mnmnt ( IIPM) hs not bn inc in this srv, s it is sistr concrn of Pnmn Mi. H th B-schoo prticipt in th srv, ito hv ppr t Rnk #6 on th Ovr Mn Scor.


2/16

15 may - 14 june 2012 4ps BuSIneSS anD maRKeTInG 91

AD


3/16

92 4ps BuSIneSS anD maRKeTInG 15 may - 14 june 2011

cover story

THE ICMR-4Ps B&M B-sCHOOL sURVEY 2012; FINAL

RANKs INDIAs CULT sTATUs B-sCHOOLsB-School GloBal

Expo-

SurE

Fun

Factor

Facul-

ty

InFra-

Struc-

turE

StudEnt

proFIlE

pErSonal-

Ity dEvEl-

opmEnt

courSE

contEnt

rESEarch

& WrIt-

InGS

InduStry

IntEr-

FacE

placE-

mEnt &

packaGES

alumnI parEn-

tal pEr-

SpEctIvE

ovErall

mEan

ScorE

1IndIan InStItutE oFmanaGEmEnt-

ahmEdaBad - IIma

9.05 8.90 9.55 9.50 9.50 9.00 9.50 9.00 9.50 9.50 9.75 9.50 112.25


BanGalorE - IIm B

9.00 8.55 9.50 9.50 9.45 9.00 9.50 9.00 9.15 9.50 9.50 9.50 111.15

3

IndIan InStItutE oF

manaGEmEnt-calcutta - IIm c 9.00 8.45 9.25 9.50 9.50 9.00 9.50 8.75 9.00 9.25 9.50 9.50 110.20

4IndIan InStItutE oF

manaGEmEnt-

lucknoW- IIm l

9.00 8.50 9.15 9.45 9.50 9.00 9.50 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.25 9.25 109.10

5IndIan School oF BuSI-

nESS - ISB, hydEraBad9.00 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.25 9.00 9.00 9.50 9.50 9.25 109.00

6Faculty oF manaGE-mEnt StudIES - FmS

8.75 8.50 9.50 9.25 9.00 9.00 9.25 9.00 9.25 9.25 9.00 9.00 108.75


IndorE - IIm-Idr

8.75 8.75 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.75 9.25 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 107.50

8Jamna lal BaJaJ InStI-tutE oF manaGEmEnt

StudIES - JBImS

9.00 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.50 9.00 8.75 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 106.75

9IndIan InStItutE oFForEIGn tradE - IIFt

8.25 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.50 9.00 8.75 9.00 8.75 9.00 9.00 105.75

10manaGEmEnt dEvElop-mEnt InStItutE - mdI

8.50 8.50 8.50 9.00 8.50 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 105.50

10IndIan InStItutE oF

manaGEmEnt - ko-zhIkodE- IIm k

8.50 8.50 9.00 9.00 8.50 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.50 9.00 105.50

12xavIEr laBour rEla-

tIonS InStItutE - xlrI8.00 8.50 9.00 8.50 9.00 8.50 9.00 9.00 8.75 9.00 9.10 9.00 105.35

13S.p JaIn InStItutE oF

manaGEmEnt &rESEarch - SpJImr

8.00 8.50 9.00 8.75 8.75 8.75 9.00 8.75 9.00 9.00 8.75 9.00 105.25

14

dEpartmEnt oF InduS-

trIal & manaGEmEntEnGInEErInG - IIt kan-

pur

8.00 8.00 9.00 8.75 8.50 8.50 8.75 8.50 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 104.00

15SymBIoSIS InStItutE oFBuSInESS manaGEmEnt

- SIBm

8.50 8.50 8.75 9.00 8.75 8.50 9.00 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 103.50

rank


4/16


*The Total Overall Mean Score might not be exactly equal to the individual score summations due to rounding; Note: The Indian Institute of Planning and Manage-ment (IIPM) has not been included in this survey, as it is a sister concern of Planman Media. Had the B-school participated in the survey, it would have appearedat Rank 6 on an Overall Mean Score.

16InStItutE oF manaGE-

mEnt tEchnoloGy,GhazIaBad - Imt

8.00 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.75 8.50 8.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 101.75

17dEpartmEnt oF man-aGEmEnt StudIES, IIt

dElhI

8.00 8.00 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.00 8.75 8.00 8.25 8.00 8.00 9.00 99.50

18narSEE monJEE InStI-tutE oF manaGEmEnt

StudIES - nmImS

8.00 8.00 8.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.75 7.75 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 99.00

19 vGSom, IIt kharaGpur 8.00 7.75 8.75 8.50 8.50 8.00 8.25 8.25 8.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 98.50

20

xavIEr InStItutE oF

manaGEmEnt, Bhu-BanESWar - xImB

8.25 7.50 8.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.75 7.75 8.50 8.00 8.50 8.50 98.25

21natIonal InStItutE oF

InduStrIal EnGInEEr-

InG- nItIE

8.15 8.00 8.00 8.50 8.15 7.50 8.25 7.50 8.75 8.55 8.50 8.25 98.10

22ShaIlESh J. mEhta

School oF manaGE-mEnt, IIt BomBay

8.25 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.75 8.50 8.00 8.25 8.00 8.50 8.25 97.50

23ForE School oF man-aGEmEnt

8.45 8.00 8.00 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.15 8.50 8.25 8.25 96.85

24dEpartmEnt oF man-

aGEmEnt StudIES, IIt

madraS

8.15 7.50 8.00 8.00 7.75 7.75 8.00 8.15 8.50 8.25 8.25 8.25 96.55

25GrEat lakES InStItutEoF manaGEmEnt, chEn-

naI

8.00 8.00 8.15 8.15 8.00 7.50 8.00 8.15 8.00 7.75 8.00 8.50 96.20

26amIty BuSInESS

School8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 8.00 7.75 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 93.75

27t.a paI manaGEmEntInStItutE - tapmI

8.00 8.00 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.75 8.00 7.75 7.50 7.50 7.50 93.50

28

prIn. l.n. WElInGkarInStItutE oF manaGE-

mEnt dEvElopmEnt &rESEarch

8.00 7.50 7.50 8.25 7.75 7.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 93.25

28IntErnatIonal man-

aGEmEnt InStItutE- ImI8.00 7.50 8.25 7.50 7.50 7.75 8.00 7.75 7.75 7.75 7.50 8.00 93.25

30loyola InStItutE oF

BuSInESS admInIStra-tIon

8.00 7.25 7.50 7.75 7.50 7.75 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.75 7.75 7.50 92.75

B-School GloBal

Expo-

SurE

Fun

Factor

Facul-

ty

InFra-

Struc-

turE

StudEnt

proFIlE

pErSonal-

Ity dEvEl-

opmEnt

courSE

contEnt

rESEarch

& WrIt-

InGS

InduStry

IntEr-

FacE

placE-

mEnt &

packaGES

alumnI parEn-

tal pEr-

SpEctIvE

ovErall

mEan

ScorErank


5/16

cover story

RAnk College City StAte oveRAllPeRCePtion SCoRe

1 IndIan InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt - ShIllonG - IImS SHIllONg MegHalaya 4.75

2 SymBIoSIS cEntrE For manaGEmEnt & human rESourcE dEvElopmEnt(Scmhrd)

PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 4.71

3 IcFaI BuSInESS School (IBS) HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 4.68

4 k. J. SomaIya InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa 4.67

5 ImS - noIda NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH 4.65

6 InStItutE oF rural manaGEmEnt (Irma) aNaNd gujaRaT 4.60

7 vEl'S InStItutE oF BuSInESS admInIStratIon CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu 4.55

8 Itm School oF BuSInESS gwalIOR MadHya PRadeSH 4.50

9 hydEraBad BuSInESS School, GItam unIvErSIty HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 4.45

10 dItm School oF BuSInESS StudIES - mGt SONIPaT HaRyaNa 4.43

11 GEmS B School BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 4.40

12 InStItutE oF rural manaGEmEnt (Irm) jaIPuR RajaSTHaN 4.36

13 apEx IntItutE oF manaGEmEnt & ScIEncE jaIPuR RajaSTHaN 4.33

14 t. John BuSInESS School BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 4.30

15 dElhI School oF proFESSIonal StudIES & rESEarch New delHI delHI 4.27

16 BImhrd PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 4.25

17 GalGotIaS BuSInESS School gReaTeR NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH 4.22

18 prEStIGE InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt gwalIOR MadHya PRadeSH 4.20

19 IISWBm - IndIan InStItutE oF SocIal WElFarE & BuSInESS manaGEmEnt KOlKaTa weST BeNgal 4.15

20 Goa InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt RIBaNdaR gOa 4.10

21 unIvErSIty BuSInESS School CHaNdIgaRH PuNjaB 4.00

22 punJaB collEGE oF tEchnIcal EducatIon (pctE) ludHIaNa PuNjaB 3.99

23 chrISt unIvErSIty, InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.90

24 ISB&m PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 3.75

25 thE oxFord collEGE oF BuSInESS manaGEmEnt BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.70

26 G. l. BaJaJ InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy & manaGEmEnt gReaTeR NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH 3.65

27 GItam InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt VISaKHaPaTNaM aNdHRa PRadeSH 3.6428 JaGan InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES New delHI delHI 3.62

29 n. l. dalmIa InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES & rESEarch THaNe MaHaRaSHTRa 3.61

30 pESIm-pES InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.60

31 InStItutE oF puBlIc EntErprISE HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 3.58

32 nIIlm cEntrE For manaGEmEnt StudIES New delHI delHI 3.56

33 JaGannath InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt ScIEncES New delHI delHI 3.55

34 nEW dElhI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt New delHI delHI 3.53

THE ICMR-4Ps B&M POWER B-sCHOOLs


6/16


RAnk College City StAteoveRAll

PeRCePtion SCoRe

35 ShErWood collEGE oF manaGEmEnt luCKNOw uTTaR PRadeSH 3.52

36 maGnuS School oF BuSInESS HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 3.51

37 lal Bahadur ShaStrI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt R. K. PuRaM delHI 3.50

38 aurora'S BuSInESS School HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 3.49

39 taxIla BuSInESS School jaIPuR RajaSTHaN 3.47

40 mat'S School oF BuSInESS BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.46

41 chandIGarh BuSInESS School laNdRaN PuNjaB 3.45

42 allIancE BuSInESS School BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.44

43 natIonal InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy TIRuCHIRaPPallI TaMIl Nadu 3.43

44 narmada collEGE oF manaGEmEnt BHaRuCH gujaRaT 3.41

45 mIt School oF BuSInESS PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 3.40

46 raWal InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt FaRIdaBad HaRyaNa 3.38

47 IIlm InStItutE For hIGhEr EducatIon guRgaON HaRyaNa 3.37

48 mar athanaSIoS collEGE For advancEd StudIES TIRuValla KeRala 3.35

49 EmpI BuSInESS School New delHI delHI 3.34

50 InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt tEchnoloGy NagPuR MaHaRaSHTRa 3.32

51 datta mEGhE InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES NagPuR MaHaRaSHTRa 3.30

52 raJaGIrI School oF manaGEmEnt COCHIN KeRala 3.29

53 pIonEEr InStItutE oF proFESSIonal StudIES INdORe MadHya PRadeSH 3.27

54 vIGnana JyothI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH 3.26

55 School oF communIcatIon and manaGEmEnt StudIES COCHIN KeRala 3.25

56 mEt InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa 3.24

57 IndrapraStha unIvErSIty School oF manaGEmEnt delHI delHI 3.22

58 xavIEr InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & EntrEprEnEurShIp BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.21

59 BharathIdaSan InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt TIRuCHIRaPPallI TaMIl Nadu 3.20

60 SydEnham InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES rESEarch & EntErprE-nEurShIp EducatIon (SImSrEE)

MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa 3.17

61 unIvErSIty oF Jammu, thE BuSInESS School jaMMu jaMMu & KaSHMIR 3.16

62 SymBIoSIS InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 3.14

63 St JoSEphS collEGE oF BuSInESS admInIStratIon BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa 3.13

64 amrIta BuSInESS School COIMBaTORe TaMIl Nadu 3.11

65 BhuBanESWar InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & InFormatIon tEchnoloGy BHuBaNeSwaR OdISHa 3.10

66 pIllaIS InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES & rESEarch NaVI MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa 3.09

67 IndIan InStItutE oF rural manaGEmEnt, Faculty oF manaGEmEntStudIES

jaIPuR RajaSTHaN 3.07

68 aBIt-Jrd tata InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt CuTTaCK OdISHa 3.05

69 taSmac PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa 3.02

70 GauhatI unIvErSIty, dEpartmEnt oF BuSInESS admInIStratIon guwaHaTI aSSaM 3.00


7/16


InDuSTRy STalwaRTS who weRThIS yeaRs SuRvey alSo IncluDeD Some of InDIas moST ReSpecTeD anD moST InTellecTu

Alok BharadwajSenior VP,

Canon India

Jiby ThomasCo-founder&VP

Marketing, Quickr.com

Anisha MotwaniDirector&CMO,

Max New York Life Insurance

Sidharth RaoCo-Founder&CEO,

Webchutney

Ambika SharmaMD&CEO, Pulp StrategyCommunications Pvt. Ltd.

Sajid ShamimBrand Director,

Reebok India

Alok has been the driving orcebehind sales, marketing, corpo-

rate planning & brand buildingactivities o Canon in India orover a decade now. He has suc-cessfully led the company towardsachieving exponential growth &market leadership in India. Atpresent, he is also the VP o MAITand a part o the CIIs NationalCommittee or IT & ITeS.

With a prime ocus on develop-ing Internet based transactionsor Indian community, Jiby hasused his 17 years experience inbuilding a strong e-commercebrand Quikr.com that currentlyis being accessed by over 25million users every month.

Anisha is a marketing veteran with strongbrand management credentials. She hasan established track record o over 20years in building consumer brands in ahighly competitive environment. She hasused her insight and experience to createeective campaigns across industries. Sheis also an independent speaker at diverse

industry orums.

An entrepreneur by heart, Sid-harth is a B-school dropout bychoice. But his understanding othe market was spot on. Started

in 1999, his frms clientele nowincludes brands like Microsot,HP, Google, Citibank & Pepsi.

Awarded Marketing Proessional o theyear or excellence in branding and mar-keting in 2011, Ambikas thoroughly bredmarketing expertise in planning and im-plementation o a delighted consumerexperience inspired her in building astrong brand that provides strategic yetcustomised brand activation solutions.

Under his decade long guidanceReebok has been able to main-tain its leadership position in anever increasing competitive mar-ket. His passion or constant ex-perimentation makes him & hisbrand stand apart in the league.

c o v e R S T o R y I n D u S T R y pa R T I c I pa T I o n


8/16


9/16


cover story

RAnk College City StAte

1 BlS InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt gHaZIaBad uTTaR PRadeSH

2 GIan JyotI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy MOHalI PuNjaB

3 m.k.m. IndIan InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt jaIPuR RajaSTHaN

4 S.I.E.S. collEGE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES NaVI MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa

5 hErItaGE InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy KOlKaTa weST BeNgal

6 mahakal InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt ujjaIN MadHya PRadeSH

7 vEl-tEch CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

8 SymBIoSIS cEntrE For InFormatIon tEchnoloGy PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

9 nEvIllE WadIa InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES & rESEarch PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

10 Faculty oF manaGEmEnt StudIES, Goa unIvErSIty TaleIgaO PlaTeau gOa

11 nImt InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy manaGEmEnt gHaZIaBad uTTaR PRadeSH

12 IB, IpS acadEmy INdORe MadHya PRadeSH

13 oSmanIa unIvErSIty, Faculty oF manaGEmEnt MaHBuBNagaR aNdHRa PRadeSH

14 alIGarh muSlIm unIvErSIty, dEpartmEnt oF BuSInESS admInIStratIon alIgaRH uTTaR PRadeSH

15 tEcnIa InStItutE oF advancEd StudIES New delHI delHI

16 nEhru collEGE oF manaGEmEnt COIMBaTORe TaMIl Nadu

17 aSIan InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy yaMuNaNagaR HaRyaNa

18 rEGIonal collEGE oF manaGEmEnt BHuBaNeSwaR OdISHa

19 Sona School oF manaGEmEnt SaleM TaMIl Nadu

20 dISha InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy RaIPuR CHaTTISgaRH

21 apEEJay School oF manaGEmEnt New delHI delHI

Mhd:4Ps B&M, in association with the Indian Council or Market Research (ICMR), conducted a pan-India perception survey on the upcom-ing B-schools. The survey was conducted amongst management students (fnal year students; sample size o 200) and aculty members(sample size o 20) o several management institutes across the country. The respondents were asked to name one upcoming B-schoolbased on the parameters o inrastructure, placement, packages and industry interace. The requency o responses helped us to draw alist o the 50 upcoming B-schools in the country which could be the most sought ater ones in the near uture.

UPCOMINgB-sCHOOLs

iCMR-4Ps B&M Upcm B-schs


10/16


AD


11/16


cover story

RAnk College City StAte

22 raI BuSInESS School FaRIdaBad HaRyaNa

23 IndIan School oF mInES, dEpartmEnt oF manaGEmEnt dHaNBad jHaRKHaNd

24 BIrla InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt tEchnoloGy gReaTeR NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH

25 coSmIc BuSInESS School New delHI delHI

26 doddappa appa InStItutE oF mBa gulBaRga KaRNaTaKa

27 karnataka unIvErSIty, kouSalI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES dHaRwad KaRNaTaKa

28 army InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt KOlKaTa weST BeNgal

29 dImS InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt StudIES New delHI delHI

30 kurukShEtra unIvErSIty, dEpartmEnt oF manaGEmEnt KuRuKSHeTRa HaRyaNa

31 maharIShI arvInd InStItutE oF EnGInEErInG & tEchnoloGy jaIPuR RajaSTHaN

32 EaSt WESt InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa

33 JaIpurIa InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH

34 modI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy KOTa RajaSTHaN

35 dayalBaGh EducatIonal InStItutE agRa uTTaR PRadeSH

36 IndrapraStha collEGE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy jOdHPuR RajaSTHaN

37 lal Bahadur ShaStrI InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt tEchnoloGy BaReIlly uTTaR PRadeSH

38 InStItutE oF productIvIty & manaGEmEnt KaNPuR uTTaR PRadeSH

39 Jadavpur unIvErSIty,InStItutE oF BuSInESS manaGEmEnt KOlKaTa weST BeNgal

40 maharaJa aGraSEn InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & tEchnoloGy jagadHRI HaRyaNa

41 maduraI kamraJ unIvErSIty, dEpartmEnt oF manaGEmEnt StudIES MaduRaI TaMIl Nadu

42 tEzpur unIvErSIty, dEpartmEnt oF BuSInESS admInIStratIon SONITPuR aSSaM

43 maharIShI arvInd InStItutE oF ScIEncE & manaGEmEnt jaIPuR RajaSTHaN

44 kohInoor BuSInESS School PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

45 S.k.InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt aNaNaTPuR aNdHRa PRadeSH

46 IntErnatIonal School oF BuSInESS and mEdIa PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

47 IcBm School oF BuSInESS ExcEllEncE HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH

48 BIShop hErBEr collEGE, dEpartmEnt oF manaGEmEnt TIRuCHIRaPPallI TaMIl Nadu

49 ct InStItutE oF manaGEmEnt & InFormatIon tEchnoloGy jalaNdHaR PuNjaB

50 chEnnaI BuSInESS School CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

UPCOMINgB-sCHOOLs


12/16

AD


13/16


cover story


14/16

POWERPRIVATEUNIVERsITIEs Mhd:The Indian Council or Market Research (ICMR)conducted an opinionated perceptual survey on thetop private universities o the uture. The survey

was conducted amongst education consultants,industry experts and renowned educationists. Theexperts were asked to name and list a ew upcominguniversities in the country based on the extent ocourses and academic programs covered, afliations

accredited to them, brand equity and media visibil-ity. Based on the responses the list below o theprivate universities o the uture was generated.

Apart rom the private universities a separate list

o 25 most promising engineering colleges was alsogenerated. This particular list was created to in-crease the scope o our study. Coaching centres,students currently pursuing an engineering courseand aculty members were covered under the pur-view o the study. An overall sample o 250 respon-dents were covered using a structured question-naire through telephonic and email techniques.The most popular private universities named bythese respondents were listed to give our readersthe 25 most promising engineering colleges 2012.

A lthough annual enrolments in higher education have grownsteadily at 6.3% over the last decade, the GER (Gross En-rolment Ratio is a statistical measure used by the United Nations

to measure education index of a nation) in India still stands at12.4%, way below the global average o 26%. Even the HumanDevelopment Index or the year 2011 ranked India at 134, oneo the lowest among the League o Nations. This clearly indi-cates that India requires more institutions to address the issueo accessibility, which is only possible i government encour-ages entrepreneurs to set up private colleges and universities.

A good news is that, according to a recent report (PrivateUniversities in India: An Investment in National Development)

by management consultancy group Parthenona, private univer-sities in the country have more than doubled in the last six years.

While the country had 20 private universities prior to 2005, thatfgure surged to 107 last year. However, the bad news is thatIndia still ranks one o the lowest in terms o number o uni-

versities per population. While US has nearly 2,500 universitiesor a population o about 313 million, India has a little over 350universities catering to a population o 1.3 billion. Even Ger-many and UK have over 350 and 125 universities or a populationo 80 million and 60 million respectively. Experts estimate thatIndia needs 1,000 universities more and the higher education

enrolment ratio to be increased by 20% in the next 10 years, tomeet the challenges o countrys development.

This certainly compels the government to make room ornon-governmental educational institutions to shoulder thisresponsibility while, at the same time, increasing its eorts tostrengthen and empower the existing universities. And not justgovernment, even educational institutions, just like corpora-tions, need to look inward and at the paradigm shits happeningall over the world. Apart rom the act that we are now lookingat an increasingly multi-polar global environment and a shitrom a single ideology, it is a oregone conclusion that leaderso tomorrow will need a radically dierent approach as com-

pared to their predecessors. Hence, it is important or educa-tional institutions to realise that they have a critical role to playin building these leaders, and to understand how they can ul-fll their role responsibly, as it also links to their own long-termsustainability. Listed below are the Power Private Universitiesand Indias 25 Most Promising Engineering Colleges whichare imparting high quality education in India. They are provid-ing a proessional learning environment that acts as a catalystnot only or the exponential growth o students, but or thecountry as well.

iCMR-4Ps B&M Powr Prvat Unvrsts&Most Promsng engnrng insttuts

1 SavEEtha unIvErSIty CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

2 SymBIoSIS IntErnatIonal unIvErSIty PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

3 lovEly proFESSIonal unIvErSIty PHagwaRa PuNjaB

4 manIpal unIvErSIty MaNIPal KaRNaTaKa

5 vIt unIvErSIty VellORe TaMIl Nadu

6 vElS unIvErSIty CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

7 Itm unIvErSIty gwalIOR MadHya PRadeSH

8 BharatI vIdyapEEth unIvErSIty PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

9 padamShrEE dr. d.y patIl unIvErSIty NaVI MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa

10 pEoplE'S unIvErSIty BHOPal MadHya PRadeSH

11 nIrma unIvErSIty aHMedaBad gujaRaT

12 aISEct unIvErSIty BHOPal MadHya PRadeSH

13 dr. c. v. raman unIvErSIty BIlaSPuR CHaTTISgaRH

14 thapar unIvErSIty PaTIala PuNjaB

15 chItkara unIvErSIty SOlaN HIMaCHal PRadeSH

RAnk UniveRSitieS City StAte


15/16

cover story

1 SavEEtha EnGInEErInG collEGE CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

2 BharatI vIdyapEEth unIvErSIty, collEGE oF EnGInEErInG PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

3 St. maryS Group oF InStItutIonS HydeRaBad aNdHRa PRadeSH

4 vElS EnGInEErInG collEGE CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

5 maharaJa aGraSEn InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy New delHI delHI

6 p.E.S. InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa

7 InStItutE For tEchnoloGy and manaGEmEnt guRgaON HaRyaNa

8 Itm Group oF InStItutIonS gwalIOR MadHya PRadeSH

9 JaypEE InStItutE oF InFormatIon and tEchnoloGy NOIda uTTaR PRadeSH

10 dElhI InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy & manaGEmEnt (dItm)- EnGInEErInG SONIPaT HaRyaNa

11 m.S. ramaIah InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa

12 rayat and Bahra InStItutE oF EnGInEErInG and BIo-tEchnoloGy (rBIEBt) MOHalI PuNjaB

13 adItya EnGInEErInG collEGE RajaMuNdRy aNdHRa PRadeSH

14 poornIma collEGE oF EnGInEErInG jaIPuR RajaSTHaN

15 apEx InStItutE oF EnGInEErInG & tEchnoloGy jaIPuR RajaSTHaN

16 raJaGIrI School oF EnGInEErInG and tEchnoloGy KOCHI KeRala

17 prEStIGE InStItutE oF EnGInEErInG & ScIEncE INdORe MadHya PRadeSH

18 SrEE vIdyanIkEthan EnGInEErInG collEGE TIRuPaTI aNdHRa PRadeSH

19 SGS InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy and ScIEncE INdORe MadHya PRadeSH

20 Srm collEGE oF EnGEnErInG CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

21 mIt collEGE oF EnGInEErInG PuNe MaHaRaSHTRa

22 Guru nanak dEv EnGInEErInG collEGE ludHIaNa PuNjaB

23 amrIta School oF EnGInEErInG COIMBaTORe TaMIl Nadu

24 BanGalorE InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy BaNgalORe KaRNaTaKa

25 manIpal InStItutE oF tEchnoloGy MaNIPal KaRNaTaKa

RAnk engineeRing City StAte

25 MOsTPROMIsINgENgINEERINgCOLLEgEs


16/16

RAnk eDUCAtion leARning CentRe City StAte

1 IIt-Ian'S pacE EducatIon MuMBaI MaHaRaSHTRa

2 BrIllIant tutorIalS CHeNNaI TaMIl Nadu

3 aakaSh InStItutE New delHI delHI

4 rESonancE KOTa RajaSTHaN

5 GurukrIpa carEEr InStItutE SIKaR RajaSTHaN

Mhd:4Ps B&M in association with Indian Councilor Market Research(ICMR)Conducted yetanother survey to list the top 5 educationlearning centres in the medical and engi-neering felds. The criteria o listing these

learning centres was based on their past re-cords, study material, mock tests and qual-ity o aculty available with them. The num-ber o study centres was also taken intoconsideration or the same. The peer groupo learning centres and the proessors ontheir panel suggested us their most pre-erred institute/learniong centre. The top 5recalled institutes or both medical and en-gineering felds results were collated to pro-vide you the fnal 5.

educa lar Crs

TOP 5 EDUCATIONLEARNINgCENTREs

A lthough annual enrolments in higher education have grownsteadily at 6.3% over the last decade, the GER (Gross En-rolment Ratio is a statistical measure used by the United Na-tions to measure education index o a nation) in India stillstands at 12.4%, way below the global average o 26% and pa-thetically low when compared to an average o 36.5% or devel-oping countries. Even the Human Development Index or the

year 2011 ranked India at 134, one o the lowest among theLeague o Nations. This clearly indicates that India requiresmore institutions to address the issue o accessibility, which isonly possible i government encourages entrepreneurs to setup private colleges and universities.

A good news is that, according to a recent report (PrivateUniversities in India: An Investment in National Development)

by management consultancy group Parthenona, private univer-sities in the country have more than doubled in the last six years.

While the country had 20 private universities prior to 2005, that

fgure surged to 107 last year. But the bad news is that India isstill one o the lowest in terms o number o universities perpopulation. While United States has nearly 2,500 universitiesor a population o about 313 million, India has a little over 350universities catering to a population o 1.3 billion. Even Ger-many and United Kingdom have over 350 and 125 universitiesor a population o 80 million and 60 million respectively. Ex-perts estimate that India needs 1,000 universities more and thehigher education enrolment ratio to be increased by 20% in thenext ten years, to meet the challenges o countrys develop-ment.

This certainly compels the government to make room ornon-governmental educational institutions to shoulder thisresponsibility while, at the same time, increasing its eorts to

strengthen and empower the existing universities. And not justgovernment, even educational institutions, just like corpora-tions, need to look inward and at the which

Documents

Ranking Methology