Upload
amela-blevins
View
36
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Random International, “Rain Room” (Expo 1: New York, 2013). Module I – Fundamentals. Chapter 2 Corporation Basics. Bar exam. Corporate practice. Corporation as “private constitution” Basic corporate vocabulary corporate categories corporate characteristics organic documents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 1Introduction to the Firm
Slide 1of 22
Random International, “Rain Room” (Expo 1: New York, 2013)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 2of 23
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
• Corporation as “private constitution” • Basic corporate vocabulary
– corporate categories– corporate characteristics– organic documents– corporate actors– corporate securities– fiduciary duties (derivative suit)– corporate law vs. other law
• Corporate powers– change annual meeting– equitable limitations
Module I – Fundamentals
Citizen of world
Citizen of world
Law profession
Law profession
Corporate practice
Corporate practice
Bar examBar
exam
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 1Introduction to the Firm
Slide 3of 25
Corporate practice
Corporate practice
Law profession
Law profession
Citizen of world
Citizen of world
Bar examBar
exam
Why BusOrgs?
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 4of 23
Corporate hierarchies
Corporation(officers)
Shareholders
Corporate statute(judge-made law)
Board ofDirectors
Articles of Incorporation
By-laws
Constitution
Corpora
tion a
s
privat
e co
nstitu
tion
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 5of 23
1. “Exit, voice and loyalty” in political organizations are similar to “liquidity, voting and fiduciary duties” in the corporation. True or false?
2. Public corporations are -- a. a type of non-profit
corporationb. a type of private
corporationc. a type of close
corporationd. a corporation regulated
only by federal law
3. Corporations MUST have:
a. Separate identity
b. Perpetual life
c. Limited liability
d. Centralized management (board of directors)
e. Transferable shares
4. Shareholders have a right to liquidate their investment and sell their shares to the corporation. True or false?
Pop quiz
1–T / 2–B / 3–A / 4–F
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 6of 23
5. Chancellor Bill Allen is just about the cutest jurist in the land. True or false?
6. The Model Business Corporate Act is –a. uniform statute adopted in
most statesb. ABA draft statute for states
to adopt/revise as they choose
c. modeled on the Delaware General Corporation Law
7. Corporate law is:a. Primarily judge-made law
(see ALI Principles)b. A product of each state
under choice of law principles
c. Primarily concerned with defining rights of securities -- stock, debentures, bonds, preferred shares
8. The articles of incorporation (choose two):a. Trump corporate statutesb. Trump corporate bylawsc. Name the board of
directorsd. Must be filed with the
secretary of state
1–T / 2–B / 3–B / 4–B, D
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 7of 23
Corporate fiduciary duties …
A corporation during WWII – with more business than it know what to do with -- spends $1 million to sponsor a “variety hour” radio program. One of the singers on the program is wife of the company’s board chair/ president. A shareholder claims the directors, in approving this expenditure, violated their fiduciary duties. Please analyze.
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 8of 23
Duty of loyalty
“[P]ersonal transactions of directors with the corporations … may tend to produce a conflict between self-interest and fiduciary obligation, are when challenged examined with the most scrupulous care.”
Business judgment rule (BJR)
“Questions of policy of management … are left solely to their honest and unselfish decision … and the exercise of them for the common and general interests of the corporation may not be questioned.”
Duty of care
“[A director] is called upon to use care, to exercise judgment, the degree of care, the kind of judgment, that one would give in similar situations to the conduct of his own affairs.”
Corporate Fiduciary Duties
Presumption for Presumption against
Bayer v. Beran, (NY Sup. Ct 1944)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 9of 23
Enforcement of fiduciary duties …
(1) Derivative suit
(2) Class action
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 10of 23
Derivative suit(enforce duties to corporation)
Corporation
Shareholder(lawyer)
Fiduciaries
“on behalf of corporation”
violation of corporate duties(recovery to corporation)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 11of 23
Class action(enforce duties to shareholders)
Corporation
Sh rep(lawyer)
Insiders
“on behalf of class”
violation of direct duties
(recovery to shareholders)
Shareholderclass
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 12of 23
With great power comes great responsibility …
Setting the shareholders’
meeting date …
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 13of 23
What is a proxy insurgency? Corporation
Shareholders
elect new board
Board ofdirectors
Insurgent Shareholders
Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.(Del. 1971)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 14of 23
Insurgency timeline (1971)
Dec 08 -
Propose
d new date for
meeting (C
ortland, N
Y)
Sep 17 - Share
holder insu
rgent g
roup fo
rms
Jan 11 -
Original
date for m
eeting
(byla
ws)
Sep DecNov JanOct
Oct 18 -
Board m
eets and a
mends byla
ws
Oct 27 -
Shareholder g
roup le
arns o
f new m
eeting date
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 15of 23
Power vs. Duty
“… Management has attempted to use the corporate machinery and the Delaware Law for the purpose of perpetuating itself in office … for the purpose of obstructing the legitimate efforts of dissident stockholders … These are inequitable purposes, contrary to established principles of corporate democracy.”
Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.(Del. 1971)
Delaware Supreme Court (2009)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 16of 23
Delaware’s “product”
Dec 08 -
Propose
d new date for
meeting (C
ortland, N
Y)
Sep 17 - Share
holder insu
rgent g
roup fo
rms
Jan 11 -
Original
meetin
g
date (byla
ws)
Sep DecNov JanOct
Oct 18 -
Board m
eets and a
mends byla
ws
Oct 27 -
Shareholder g
roup le
arns o
f new m
eeting date
Nov 1 -
Sharehold
er gro
up files actio
n
Nov 10 - Chancery
Court
grants
access to S
H list
Nov 18 - Chancery
Court
denies pre
lim in
junc
Nov 29 - Sup C
t rem
ands / postp
one mtg
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 17of 23
What is a tender offer? Corporation
Shareholders
Board ofdirectors
Hostile bidder
(1) buy shares
(2) elect new board
Stahl v. Apple Bancorporation, Inc.(Del. Ch. 1990)
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 18of 23
Takeover timeline (1986-90)
3/19/90 - Board
fixes r
ecord
date for A
pril 17, b
ut no m
tg date
9/86 - Stahl b
uys 20%
of outst
anding Banco
rp sh
ares
3/28/90 - Stahl s
tarts T
O @ $38 ca
sh, p
rovid
ed gets bd m
ajority
1986 1990 19911989
11/7/86 - Stahl re
aches 3
0.3% ownersh
ip
11/22/89 - Stahl p
ropose
s byla
w change and board
-pack
ing plan
4/9/90 - Specia
l bd m
tg: finan advis
ors sa
y TO is
unfair;
Bd with
draws r
ecord
date to lo
ok for a
ltern
atives
5/9/90 - Stahl s
ends out p
roxy
materia
ls
5/14/90 - Stahl s
eeks pre
lim
injunc requirin
g SH m
tg
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 19of 23
Power vs. Duty
“Fiduciary duties constitute a network of responsibilities that overlay the exercise of even undoubted legal power.”
“I cannot conclude that defendants have taken action for the purpose of impairing or impeding the effective exercise of the corporate franchise.”
“Deferring this company’s annual meeting where no meeting date has yet been set and no proxies even solicited does not impair or impede the effective exercise of the franchise.”
“Plaintiff has no legal right to compel the holding of the company’s annual meeting or right in equity to require the board to call a meeting now.”
Stahl v. Apple Bancorporation, Inc.(Del. Ch. 1990)
Chancellor William Allen
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 20of 23
Reconcile the cases …
(1) Schnell: board has power -- but it’s inequitable for board to change meeting date and impede voting insurgency
(2) Stahl: board has power -- and it’s equitable for board to not set meeting date in face of insurgency/tender offer
Corporations:A Contemporary Approach
Chapter 2Corporation Basics
Slide 21of 23
The end