Rail Baltica Growth Corridor Project Meeting€¦ · RAIL BALTICA GROWTH CORRIDOR (RBGC) WP-6 PILOT LOGISTICS . WAY OF THINKING FOR CARRYING OUT RESEARCH . 1) the largest part of

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

Rail Baltica Growth Corridor Project Meeting

Working package 6 2012.10.24

SANKT-PETERSBURG

Presentation by Mr. Albertas Arūna VGTU CCITL Project Manager


2

Peri

odca

ll.da

ys

6 13 20 27 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21

wee

ks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1. Countries WP 4 - WP 6 team 90

2. Countries WP 6 - team 90

3. Research support Group (RSG) Lappeenranta University (Fin)

90




7. RSG CCITL 90

62

Project manager Vilnius CCITL Albertas Arūna

Action plan (draft) 2012.01.30 Revised 2012.04.25.

No. ACTIVITY

2012 February 6 - 2012 May 21

REMARKS

WP 4.4

Self

asse

ssm

ent (

%)

Total

Drafting of 10 PILOT LC, including maps (schemes)

Preparation of the lists of existing and planned LC

Preparation of the lists of main LSP and transport operators, freight terminals operators

Interviews structure

Interviews by e-mail

Lists of main stakeholders of Pilot logistic centres

Deep interviews (freight terminals)


3

RAIL BALTICA GROWTH CORRIDOR (RBGC) WP-6 PILOT LOGISTICS WAY OF THINKING FOR CARRYING OUT RESEARCH 1) the largest part of costs in the process of logistics is associated with transportation logistics; 2) freight transportation consists of the following stages: collection from shippers (last miles), terminal activity, line transportation, network process management; 3) in all these stages, the owner of property and operator acting on the basis of contracts with the owner must be assigned; 4) the owner of infrastructure in international trade logistics in the countries of Eastern Europe is usually a state institution, the shares of which belong to the state, or other entities (subsidiary companies) established by them or with capital of private sector entities of other countries; 5) Freight corridor is formed by the principal route including equipment installed, transloading terminals, sideways, shunting yards, marshalling yards, bypasses and sections nearby significant destinations; 6) in case of RBGC, principal route belongs to EU TEN-T core network, and it is the object of state planning and EU financing; 7) meanwhile, additional components to the principal route – intermodal and container terminals, access railways, siding yards, train formation activity, warehouses, access roads or streets are mainly the objects of regional or local territorial planning and permissions for construction, implementation of which is associated with possession of land using right and transfer of financial contribution to the development of local infrastructure. Therefore, the influence of local level authorities is very significant; 8) the access of goods from the principal route to a warehouse or the place of retail trade is also very significant for the local people communities and is in the centre of attention due to external, mostly negative influence on the quality of life;


9) intermodal terminals are the main element with respect to accessibility of intermodal services, and this ensures economic and competitive with road transport logistic chain on a European scale;

10) the main stakeholders between the Shipper and Client in intermodal freight transportation are: terminal or intermodal operators, railway services providers, clients or their forwarders and line infrastructure managers;

11) a part of RBGC principal route is included in EU regulated Freight railway corridor No. 8, and in 2013 it is planned to carry out a corridor transport study as the main document for management of the corridor (Kaunas – Rotterdam). Such study will mainly deal with improvement of the principal route and distribution of capacities among transport operators;

12) It is stated in EC Regulation for freight railway corridor that Management Board has to form separate Working Groups for considering problems of additional corridor components, to be specific, intermodal terminals;

13) In the description of RBGC, specific definition of PILOT LOGISTICS is not provided. This will be a result of WP 4.4 activity and will be presented as WP 6 action plan. This can be interpreted as a starting point for creation of freight transport supporting working group, which would become a constituent part of corridor management process as representative of Rail Baltica in freight corridor No. 8.

14) Having analyzed the definitions found in theoretical material and other studies, a conclusion can be made: IN PILOT LOGISTICS PROCESS THE STATE OF INTERMODAL TERMINALS, THEIR INTERRELATIONS, THE PROCESS

OF LAST MILE SHOULD BE ANALYZED, WITH RESPECT TO PRESENT AND NEAREST-FUTURE TECHNICAL LEVEL OF LINE INFRASTRUCTURE.

In this case, the main stakeholders would be: operators of intermodal (container) terminals, railway transport operators and intermodal operators (operators of international logistics), attracting also groups of local forwarders.

15) PILOT LOGISTICS group should be formed of logistics components groups of Ludwigsfelde, Poznan, Lodz, Warsaw, Kaunas transport region, Riga, Tallinn, Southern Finland, consisting of the Leading and ordinary terminals. Such propositions would be presented as draft conclusion of WP 4.4. 4


5

No. Number of LC Distance from Warszaw, km

Storage space, m² Average space, m²

1. 15 ≤ 10 450.000 30.000 2. 18 10 - 20 1.110.000 61.700 3. 13 20 - 40 1.205.000 92.700

46 - 2.765.000 61.500

Logistic (warehousing) capacities in Mazovia


PL CT Terminal Operator Location

connection with the road

infrastructure

paneuropean corridors main directions scope of services

1 1 DUUS (DB international)

Güd Großbeeren GVZ Berlin

L40 (Posdam), L-76 (Berlin), B-101, Railway sidings

II, North-South axis 1 12 Terminals in Germany

Containers, swap-bodies semitrailers,

dangerous goods area, free access

2

2 CARGOSPED Sp. z o.o. (100 Cargo

PKP) Poznan (Gadki)

3 CARGOSPED Sp. Z o.o

Kobylwieca Dworcowa 3

All type of containers, swap

bodies semi-trailers, refrig. cargo

4 POLZUG

INTERMODAL POLSKA Sp. z o.o

Magazynawa 8, Gadki A2, S11 Large cont., swap

bodies, semi-trailers

5

Cantrum Logistyczno

Investycyjne Poznan (CHP)

Swarzedz - Jasin Robowiecka str. Large cont., swap

bodies, semi-trailers

3

6 SPEDCONT Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o. Lodz Olechov All types of ITU

PCC Infermodal Kutno road 92, railroad CE20/E20

Terminal Piotrków Trybunalski - operator en

Logistics (planned)

1500E, 1540E No operator



connection with the road infrastructure

paneuropean corridors main directions scope of services

4

7 CARGOSPED Sp. z o.o. Warszawa Praga DK8 I, II, VI

Hamburg, Gdynia, Gdańsk, Szczecin, Niemcy- Horka,

Frankfurt nad O., Chechy- Chałupki,

Zebrzydowice, Litwa- Trakiszki, Słowacja- Zwadroń, Muszyna

8 SPEDCONT

Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o.

Warszawa S8, DK61 I, II, VI

Transhipment of containers, swap bodies and semi-

trailers

9 POLZUG


Pruszków I, II, VI

Rotterdam, Bremenhaven,

Hamburg, Poznań, Gdańsk

Transhipment: Containers (20 '- 40' /

40 'HC / 45' / TC), swap bodies, semi-

trailer

10 POLZUG


Brwinów (at the PKP railway line Warszawa - Łódź, (2,5 km on south-

west of the existing terminal in Pruszkow).

PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE



connection with the road infrastructure

paneuropean corridors main directions scope of

services

5 10 JSC "Lithuanian railways" Šeštokai E-85, R-B I Poland, Latvia All types

6 11 Kaunas E-274, E-85, E-77 I, IX, RB Latvia, Poland,

Belorusia, Kaliningrad (RF)

All type of conteiners. 2 km -

FEZ 240 ha

7 12 JSC "Lithuanian railways" Vilnius I Poland, Latvia,

Belorusia, Klaipėda

All type of conteiners

transloading rail/rail, rail/road

8 13 Šiauliai E-272, E-77 IA, I, IX B, IA Latvia, Poland,

Belorusia, Klaipėda, Kaliningrad

Int. Airport - 2 km. All type of ITU,

Klaipėda part-160 km.

10 14 Riga conteiner terminal Ryga, Latvia E-85, A-2 I Lithuania, Russia,

Kaliningrad, N.Europa All type of containers

11 15 Muuga Container terminal

Port of Tallinn Muuga Harbour

Via-Baltica, Tallinn-Narva, S-Petersburg, R-

Baltica

I Finnland, S.Petersburg, Poland, Germany parts,

Latvia

Conteiners ro-ro cargo

11 16 Port of Helsinki Voosaari I Stockholm, Tallinn,

Travemiunde, Rostock, Gdynia, S.Peterburg

Container ro-ro traffic


Preliminary allocation of Pilot Logistics on R-B route

9


Preliminary proposal for new logistics service product

10


Proposed Action plan of the team of WP6

11

Peri

odca

ll.da

ys

6 13 20 27 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29

year

w

eeks 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44

1. Countries WP 4 - WP 6 team

2. Countries WP 6 - team

3. Research support Group (RSG) Lappeenranta University (Fin)




7. RSG CCITL

8. ▲ All partners WP-6

9. ▲ CCITL VILNIUS

10. ▲ CCITL VILNIUS

11. ▲ Experts Group



Albertas Arūna

Elaboration of a viable network for logistic capacities

Creation of stakeholders partnership

Action plan (draft) 2012.01.30 Revised 2012.05.30

No. ACTIVITY REMARKS

2012 February 6 - 2012 April 28 2012 May 7 - 2012 October 29

WP 4.4

WP-6

Drafting of 10 PILOT LC, including maps (schemes)

Preparation of the lists of existing and planned LC

Preparation of the lists of main LSP and transport operators, freight terminals operators

Interviews structure

Interviews by e-mail

Lists of main stakeholders of Pilot logistic centres

Deep interviews (freight terminals)

Listing of Expert group (incl. PL personnel)

Project manager Vilnius CCITL

Threshold

Interoperability requirements

New logistic product nominated

Draft of business model for investigation

External service agreement


IMPORTANT NEXT STEPS

1. Appointment of WP-6 experts-persons. 2. Formulating of new service product of transport

logistics (each Partner). 3. Presentation from Finland candidate for selected Pilot

logistics. 4. Appointment of personell from PL work on partnership

creation.

12


Responsible partners in WP-6 Number in RBGC Name of Partner Partner WP-6 Expert in WP-6

1 City of Helsinki Yes Overall coordination

6 Regional Council of Häme Yes Yes

9 Ludwigsfelde Yes Yes

12 Lat TDA Yes Evaluation of WP-4

13 VGTU CCITL Yes Coordination

14 Kaunas City Yes Interoperability

15 City of Warsaw Yes Coordination of WP-4

16 City of Poznan Yes Yes

17 City of Lodz Yes Yes

18 Politechnika Bialystoka No WP-4 evaluation

20 City of Bialystok Yes Yes

21 Marchol office of the Lodz Voivodship Yes Participation 13


14

A. BACKGROUND OF THE RECIPIENT 1. Terminal / logistic center name 2. Location

• address • out city/urban

3. Is your organization an independent organization or an associated with another organization • Branch

• Department • Independent

4. Institutional dependence of your organization • Railway company • Private • Public • State • Municipality

5. What type of loading units are used • Swap bodies- • Containers: • 20’’ • 40’ • Semitrailers • All types

6. What was average actual amount of loadings in 2011? • Swap bodies • Containers(TEU) • Semitrailers

7. What is the design capacity for loadings per day (2011) • Swap bodies • Containers • Semitrailers

8. What were the actual delivery distances to/from your customers in 2011? • Peak • Average • Least


15

9. What strengths of roads exist? • kN/axle- 10. Are you acting on the vertical type of network? • Yes (names the partners)

• No 11. Are you acting on the horizontal type of network? • Yes (names the partners)

• No 12. At what stage is your development plan? • Approved

• In preparation • None

13. Expected direction of development? • Extension of spatial area- • Construction of additional logistics area • Construction of warehouse • Other

14. Are you a member of national association? • Yes (provide the names of association/-s))

• No 15. Is the service open to all shippers? • Yes

• Relative open (specify conditions) • Private type

16. Do you work with a wide range of certified railway transportation service providers?

• Yes

• Relative (specify conditions) • Only with exceptional (specify)

17. Is road transportation open to all operators • Yes

• Relative (specify conditions) • Only for exceptional clients


16

18. Is rail shunting in the responsibility of terminal? • Yes

• No 19. Is road trucking service in the responsibility of terminal? • Yes

• No(what type of relation) 20. Please provide information on the distance to the

connection to the public rail network • Km-(railway station)

21. Please provide information on distance to the main road • Km – road number

22. What kind of service for clients is? • Just in time- • According request in …..hours • Other

23. What are your main clients? • Freight villages- % • Individual logistics centers- % • Industry companies- …….% • Other-…….%

24. Rail cargo transportation directions (by countries)


17

B. LOGISTIC SERVICE

25. What area (1000sq) do you have for storage of loading units? • Containers-…….

• Semitrailers……. • Swap bodies-…….

26. What area (1000 sq. m )do you have for special storage of loading units(refrigerators , dangerous goods)

27. What is the average annual utilization rate in 2011? • Storage area

• Special storage area

28. Do you use studies as development method? • Yes

• No 29. What is the main road type to/from the terminal? • Highways

• National roads • Municipal road • Urban streets

30. What part of terminal area is used for the logistics process? • Percentage and sq. Meters

31. Terminal working schedule • Hours • Days per week

32. Is the management of the road side transport and rail transport operations (loading, unloading, and handling) separated?

• Yes

• No • Partly


18

C. APPROACH TO RBGC PROJECT

33. Are you aware of the logistics support Rail Baltica GROWTH CORRIDOR project carried out under the EU Interreg program?

• Yes

• Partly • No

34. In your opinion, what is the influence of the factors listed below on the increase of rail freight share in the total freight traffic on Rail Baltica corridor? (evaluate the importance of each factor from 1 to 6 points (1 is unimportant – 6 crucial factor)

• National rail-technology Inter-operability • Interest of forwarding companies • Number of capable intermodal terminals • Intermodal terminals interoperability • Intermodal terminals, forwarding companies and

railway companies level of cooperation • Intermodal terminals, forwarders cooperation

35. Are you willing to participate actively in the cooperation initiative along Rail Baltica (Berlin, Poznan, Lodz, Warsaw, Kaunas, Riga, Tallinn, and Helsinki)?

• Yes

• No • To be decided

36. What form of cooperation is acceptable for your company? • Memorandum of understanding • Agreement on cooperation • Permanent thematic working group • Association • Other


19

LIST OF POSSIBLE RECIPIENTS IN THE INTERVIEW PROCESS (RBGC, WP6)

1. Cargosped terminal Warszawa: [email protected], Ryszard Nakowieczny, tel. (+48)600018806 2. Cargosped terminal Gliwice: [email protected] Wojciech Mecik, tel. (+48)600018530 3. Cargosped terminal Kobylnica: [email protected], Wojciech Stoma tel. (+48)600018359 4. Cargosped terminal Gadki,: Poland, [email protected], Ryszard Nakowieczny 5. Terminal kontenerowy Spedcont: [email protected] Mr. Marek Turajczek tel. +48426137490; +48426137466 6. Terminal Kontenerowy Cargosped :[email protected] Ms. Elzbieta Bielska tel. +48236895216; +48236895226 7. Terminal Dabrowa Görniczo; [email protected] tel. +48327927091; +48327501570; fax. +48327501573 8. Spedcont Terminal Kontenerowy Warszawa: [email protected], Mr. Jan Swistok, (+4822)8368131; 8365356; 8365337 9. Terminal Kontenerowy Lodz Olechow [email protected], (+4842) 6491362; 6492057; 6492717 10. Terminal Kontenerowy Poznan Garbary [email protected], Mr. Ryszard Raclaw, tel. (+4861) 8517061; 6335451 11. Terminal Kontenerowy Sosnowiec Poludniowy: [email protected] tel. (+4832)2933064; 2933065; fax. (+4832)2933063 12. Container terminal Poznan/Gadki Polzug intermodal Polska: www.polzug.de, Mr. Agnieszka Rybicka, [email protected], tel. (+48)616343700; 616343701; fax. (+48)616343750

mailto:[email protected]











http://www.polzug.de/



20

13. Conteiner Terminal Warszawa Praga Cargosped www.cargosped.pl Director: Ryszard Nakowieczny, [email protected], tel. (+48)228113990; 228141583; 228112111 14. Terminal PCC Kutno: Director Wojciech Skrzypinski, [email protected], [email protected] 15. Terminal PCC Gliwice, Director Pawel Lesesz, [email protected], [email protected] 16. PCC Office in Hamburg ,Marketing Department: Monika Konsor-Faferek, [email protected] 17. Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. Zo.o Pruszkow: [email protected], Ms. Iwona Swieton 18. Terminal kontenerowy Wroclaw, [email protected], tel. 48713413804 19. Container Terminal WROCLAW Polzug intermodal Polska, www.polzug.de, Dr. Dorota Misztal, [email protected], tel. (+48)713413804; 713413826; fax. (+48)713423043 20. Muuga Container Terminal, [email protected], tel. +3726319125, fax. +3726319123 21. AS EWR Cargo, [email protected], www.edel.ee, +3726158594, +37261586902; +372 22. AS EVR Cargo, [email protected], Estonian Logistic Cluster, www.transport.ee 23. DB Schenker Latvia, [email protected], tel. +37167207516, fax. +37167068800 rail and multimodal transport 24. Uldis Zvirgzdinis, Logistics BU manager, Latvia. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 25. DUUS (DB international) Süd Großbeeren GVZ Berlin: www.gvz-berlin.de [email protected] ; 26. LLC „LDZ“ Cargo Logistika, Maris Kancans; [email protected]

http://www.cargosped.pl/







mailto:Pruszkow.Terminal@polzug


http://www.polzug.de/




http://www.edel.ee/


http://www.transport.ee/





http://www.gvz-berlin.de/




21

Preparation of coordination paper for implementation of Working package Nr.6 The aim of WP-6 is to define common interoperability between existing logistics centres and intermodal

terminals. WP-6 aims to harmonize service of logistics centres in the Rail-Baltica region and to create new

service product for global freight flows. Stakeholder and networking analyses of WP3 and WP4 will be

applied to create stakeholder partnership model in the context of logistics centres. Improved interoperability

of logistics centres and intermodal terminals in the RBGC cluster create potential for design of new service

products within the Region. Based on the harmonized and thus more competitive network of logistics

centres, joint branding and promotion activities are implemented to related markets in Asia and Europe.

WP-6 has 4 main activities:

6.1 – Planning and kick off.

6.2 – Creation of stakeholder partnership for development of service product.

6.3 – Interoperability threshold and development of promotion concept.

6.4 – Joint branding and promotion campaign.


22

6.1 Planning and kick off. WP-6 10 partners create Pilot expert team. This team is invited to suggest logistics centers as the

Pilot cases in WP-6. Selected logistics centers will operate as pilot platform for the WP-6 activities,

aiming for improvement of interoperability along Rail Baltica. Pilot logistics centers and intermodal

terminals are selected in each Rail Baltica country, using results of the WP4 and expertise of the Pilot

Expert Team. Selected logistics centers are seen to complement each other and by their existing

operational profiles, agree on a division of work contributing to the development of the new operating

concepts.

Time frame 01.2012 – 06.2012


23

6.2 Creation of stakeholder – partnership for development of service

product. Activities include:

1. The modelling of partnership by collecting authorities and sector specific stakeholders from private

sector to plan and create a new common service model.

2. The logistics centres and their control stakeholders gather together in order to work on the issues of

interoperability and direction of works.

3. New operating concepts enable development of at least one service product, which can be jointly

promoted to related markets. Basic interoperability requirements are being analyzed. The analysis will be

used by Pilot logistical centers as a tool to build cooperation and a join operating concept. Two different

viewpoints should be used. Firstly, to create a functional logistics centers network to serve global freight

flows between Asia and Europe. Secondly – another operating concept will be developed for the transport

flows going to the direction of Central and Southern Europe.

Time frame: 03.2012 – 12.2012


24

6.3 Interoperability threshold (IT) IT indicates the minimum requirements for interoperability for globally oriented, internationally

viable Rail Baltica railway route.

An analysis of development needs for critical logistics and service infrastructure will be

implemented. Influence of the public decision – making on these critical investments will be evaluated.

On the basis of the overall analyses, the Pilot experts Team outlines the status of the logistics

centers along Rail Baltica in relation to: a) Asian markets b) Europe markets.

Time frame: 04/2012 – 03/2013


25

6.4 Joint branding and promotion campaign. Campaign consists of joint participation on fairs and specific dissemination releases. The activity

promotes Rail Baltica as an integrated distribution hub in the BSR, thus raising awareness in

capability and competitiveness of RBGC. New potential costumers and markets can be reached.

The consultant’s tasks:

•To prepare common road – map for investigation in activities 6.2 – 6.3

•To propose principles for selection of logistics centres as Pilot case.

•To propose possible variants of network partnership.

•To describe logistics centres network elements.

•To present good practise example of networking.

To draft main interoperability requirements for the new service product


26


27

Terms of reference for external service (Theses)

1) To describe some best practice cases on logistic product in the network of intermodal terminals in

Germany, Netherlands.

2) To prepare solutions for the possible logistic product on principal route Tallinn-Kaunas- Warsaw-

Poznan-Berlin (2 proposals)

3) To prepare economical calculations for proposed new logistic solutions, to compare with existing

practice in terms of time, price, frequency, accessibility, reliability, flexibility, storage and etc.

4)To describe theoretical and practical aspects of interoperability between intermodal terminals on the

route of RBGC.

5) To propose organizational, technical and managements improvements for the achieving the highest

level of competiveness of proposed new product solutions,

6) To present the descriptions of proposed models of partnership between stakeholders for the new logistic

product.

7) To propose minimum interoperability requirements and threshold for the interoperability on the route

Tallinn- Berlin.

Documents

Rail Baltica Growth Corridor Project Meeting€¦ · RAIL BALTICA GROWTH CORRIDOR (RBGC) WP-6 PILOT LOGISTICS . WAY OF THINKING FOR CARRYING OUT RESEARCH . 1) the largest part of