Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    1/17

    PICTORIAL REVIEW

    Radiolucent lesions of the mandible: a pattern-based

    approach to diagnosis

    Laurène Avril   & Tommaso Lombardi   & Angeliki Ailianou   &

    Karim Burkhardt   & Arthur Varoquaux   & Paolo Scolozzi   &

    Minerva Becker

    Received: 20 September 2013 / Revised: 1 November 2013 /Accepted: 6 November 2013 / Published online: 10 December 2013# The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

    Abstract

    Objectives  Radiolucent mandibular lesions seen on panoram-

    ic radiographs develop from both odontogenic and non-odontogenic structures. They represent a broad spectrum of 

    lesions with a varying degree of malignant potential. The

     purpose of this review is to illustrate the characteristic imaging

    findings — as well as the clinical and histological features — of 

    common and uncommon radiolucent lesions of the mandible.

     Methods   This review article is based on the retrospective

    evaluation of 11,725 panoramic radiographs seen in our insti-

    tution during the past 6 years. It provides a comprehensive,

     practical approach to the radiological interpretation of radio-

    lucent lesions of the mandible. To facilitate the diagnostic

    approach, we have classified radiolucent lesions into two

    groups: lesions with well-defined borders and those with ill-

    defined borders.

     Results   Lesion prevalence, age of manifestation, location

    within the mandible, relationship to dental structures, effect 

    on adjacent structures and characteristic findings at computed

    tomography (CT), cone beam CT (CBCT) and magnetic

    resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging

    (DWI) are discussed. Pitfalls including malignant lesions

    mimicking benign disease and pseudo-lesions are equally

    addressed.Conclusion   Knowledge of the characteristic imaging features

    of radiolucent mandibular lesions narrows the differential

    diagnosis and is crucial for the identification of those lesions,

    where biopsy is indicated for definitive histology.

    Teaching points

    • Panoramic X-rays, CT and MRI are essential for the work-

    up of radiolucent mandibular lesions.

    • Lesion borders, location within the mandible, relationship to

    dental structures and tissue characteristics on cross-

     sectional imaging are indispensable to narrow the differen-

    tial diagnosis.

    •  High-resolution CT and CBCT play a major role for the

    assessment of lesion margins and their relationship to im-

     portant anatomic structures, such as the inferior alveolar 

    nerve.

    • Although most radiolucent lesions with well-defined sclerot-

    ic borders are benign, MRI may reveal clinically unsuspect-

    ed malignant disease.

    Keywords   Mandible . Radiolucent lesions . Panoramic

    radiography . Computed tomography (CT) . Magnetic

    resonance imaging (MRI)

    Abbreviations

    ADC Apparent diffusion coefficient 

    AAOMS American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial

    Surgeons

    BRONJ Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

    CBCT Cone beam computed tomography

    CT Computed tomography

    DWI Diffusion-weighted imaging

    EG Eospinophilic granuloma 

    GCG Giant cell granuloma 

    L. Avril : A. Ailianou : A. Varoquaux : M. Becker (*)

    Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva,

    University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4,1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland

    e-mail: [email protected]

    T. Lombardi : P. Scolozzi

    Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University Hospital of 

    Geneva, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4,

    1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland

    K. Burkhardt 

    Department of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Geneva,

    University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4,

    1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

    DOI 10.1007/s13244-013-0298-9

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    2/17

    HL Hodgkin lymphoma  

    KCOT Keratocystic odontogenic tumour 

    LCH Langerhans cell histiocytosis

    MRI Magnetic resonance imaging

     NHL Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 

    OPT Orthopantomography

    ORN Osteoradionecrosis

    PET/CT Positron emission tomography combinedwith CT

    PET/MRI Positron emission tomography combined

    with MRI

    SBC Simple bone cyst  

    SCC Squamous cell carcinoma 

    SUV Standardised uptake value

    Introduction

    Conventional radiography may reveal a variety of radiolucent 

    lesions in the mandible. These represent a broad spectrum of odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions with a varying de-

    gree of malignant potential. Interpretation of radiolucent le-

    sions of the mandible can be challenging either because the

    clinical presentation may be non-specific or because the lesion

    may be detected incidentally [1, 2]. In some cases, the diag-

    nosis will be mainly made based on clinical symptoms. In

    other cases, although a thorough clinical evaluation is manda-

    tory, clinical findings are non-contributory, as the lesion can-

    not be seen or palpated and laboratory findings are not abnor-

    mal. Imaging is essential not only for the diagnosis of man-

    dibular lesions but also to guide therapy and to monitor 

    treatment response. Although common, mandibular lesions

    are not frequently imaged by radiologists. Nevertheless, their 

    recognition is essential for a rapid and correct diagnosis. This

    review provides a comprehensive, practical approach to the

    radiological interpretation of radiolucent lesions of the man-

    dible and discusses their clinical presentation and pathophys-

    iology. It focuses on the radiological techniques used and their 

    respective role for the assessment of these lesions.

    Imaging modalities

    Due to the easy access and low radiation dose, conventional

    r ad io gr ap hs s uc h a s p an or am ic r ad io gr ap hs

    (orthopantomographies [OPTs] or panoramix X-rays) as well

    as dental intraoral radiographs traditionally form the backbone

    in the diagnosis of osseous changes in the mandible [1, 3]. In

    addition, the introduction of digital radiographs has lead to

    further dose reduction (up to 80 %) with the possibility of 

    densitometric and subtraction techniques [4]. Conventional

    radiographs of the mandible, typically OPTs, may reveal

    radiolucent, radiodense or mixed pattern lesions [1,   3]. In

    many cases, such as in radicular cysts, the diagnosis is

    straightforward and no additional imaging is required for 

    diagnosis and treatment. As conventional radiographs are

    two-dimensional projections of three-dimensional structures,

    they have a limited value for the assessment of lesion size, lesion

    margins, as well as extension into important anatomic structures

    or soft tissues. Computed tomography (CT), cone beam CT

    (CBCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emis-sion tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) and more re-

    cently positron emission tomography combined with MRI

    (PET/MRI) complement conventional radiographs overcoming

    the above-mentioned limitations and providing more specific

    information in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic options.

    Thin-slice (1-mm), high-resolution CT with bone window

    settings is mainly used pre-operatively to precisely assess

    lesion size, margins, destruction and expansion patterns, as

    well as the relationship of the lesion to the mandibular canal.

    Although coronal slices are sufficient in many situations,

    dental CT with orthoradial and panoramic reconstructions

    are superior to standard coronal reconstructions for the eval-uation of the relationship of a lesion to the dental structures

    and to the mandibular canal. Intravenous contrast material is

    mainly used in cases of suspected jaw infection or in neoplas-

    tic diseases to assess the intraosseous and extraosseous in-

    volvement. Although CBCT has gained increasing popularity

    over the past years, it does not allow evaluation of 

    extraosseous structures; use of CBCT may therefore lead to

    underestimation of disease extent.

    High-resolution MRI is mainly used as a complementary

    tool to CT or CBCT, as it allows precise depiction of 

    intraosseous and extraosseous lesion components, cyst wall

    architecture (thin versus irregular walls, mural nodules, pap-

    illary projections), enhancement patterns after intravenous

    administration of gadolinium chelates (mild to strong), and

    type of soft tissue involvement (displacement versus infiltra-

    tion) [5]. In inflammatory and infectious lesions, MRI is more

    sensitive than CT or CBCT for the detection of bone marrow

    involvement [6].

    Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is a functional MRI

    technique based on the assessment of random (Brownian)

    motion of water molecules. Biological barriers can impair 

    the free displacement of water molecules, thus resulting in

    restricted diffusivity. Restricted diffusivity is seen in a variety

    of conditions, including stroke, tumours with increased cellu-

    larity, infection and inflammation, as well as abscesses.

    Diffusion in biological tissues can be quantified using the

    apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). ADC measurements

    (in mm2/s) have been shown to be reproducible with excellent 

    intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the head and

    neck [7]. MRI with DWI and ADC measurements helps in the

    differential diagnosis of cysts, ameloblastomas and malignant 

    tumours (see below). Although ADC values cannot predict the

    histological grade in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 

    86 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    3/17

    (SCC), lower values are observed in poorly differentiated

    lesions whereas higher values are seen in well-differentiated

    tumours [7]. In lymphomas, ADC measurements typically

    yield very low values (see below).

    As a general rule, PET/CT is uncommonly used for the

    work-up of mandibular lesions. Nevertheless, it may be

    employed as a complementary examination for the staging

    of malignant tumours invading the mandible, such as SCC of the oral cavity with secondary mandibular invasion, in prima-

    ry intraosseous SCC or in mandibular lymphoma. In cases of 

    metastases to the mandible, PET/CT may reveal the location

    of the primary tumour  — if unknown — or may effectively

    show involvement of multiple organs. The most commonly

    used radiotracer is   18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). FDG is a 

    glucose analogue that is taken up by metabolically active

    tumour cells using facilitated glucose transport. In clinical

    routine, quantification of tracer uptake is performed using

    the standardised uptake value (SUV). High SUVs reflect high

    glucose metabolism mainly seen in aggressive tumours (typ-

    ically SCC and lymphoma), while lower SUV values arerather seen in slowly growing, less aggressive tumours, in

    tumours with large areas of necrosis or in inflammatory con-

    ditions. The recent implementation of integrated hybrid PET/ 

    MRI systems in clinical head and neck oncology [8] holds

     promise as it combines morphological, functional and molec-

    ular information at the same time, thereby providing addition-

    al diagnostic gain. However, research into the potential clin-

    ical role of PET/MRI in comparison with PET/CT, MRI with

    DWI or the combination thereof, is still ongoing.

    This review article is based on the retrospective evaluation of 

    11,725 panoramic radiographs seen during a period of 6 years at 

    our institution. From a practical point of view, radiolucent 

    mandibular lesions can be divided into lesions with well-

    defined borders and lesions with poorly defined borders.

    Radiolucent lesions with well-defined borders

    Radicular cyst 

    Odontogenic cysts are true cysts arising from the epithelium

    left over from tooth development. Radicular cysts, also called

     periapical cysts or apical periodontal cysts, are the most com-

    mon odontogenic cysts [1,   2]. Tooth infection may lead to

    necrosis of the pulp cavity and may spread to the tooth apex

    with ulterior development of a periapical granuloma or 

     periapical abscess. The latter may subsequently give rise to a 

    radicular cyst. Radicular cysts arise from epithelial cell rests of 

    the periodontal ligament, which are stimulated by the inflam-

    matory products. Most often, radicular cysts are asymptomat-

    ic. They may be seen in all age groups, however, more often

     between 30 and 60 years of age and are typically associated

    with a non-vital tooth. Imaging features are straightforward

    and include a unilocular periapical lesion with well-defined,

    sclerotic borders in close vicinity of the apical portion of the

    root of a non-vital tooth. No contrast material enhancement is

    seen on CT or MRI. In atypical cases with latero-dental

    location, CTor CBCT is very helpful for the correct diagnosis

    (Fig. 1). Treatment options include apical surgery, tooth ex-

    traction and endodontic treatment.

    Residual cyst 

    Residual cysts are periapical cysts retained in the jaw after 

    surgical removal of a non-vital tooth [1, 3]. Residual cysts are

    common and have similar clinical and radiological features as

    radicular cysts. However, there is always a missing tooth

    (Fig.   2). Most residual cysts are less than 1 cm in size.

    Occasionally, enlarging cysts may cause displacement of the

    adjacent teeth, as well as bone expansion.

    Dentigerous cyst 

    Follicular cysts, also called dentigerous cysts or pericoronal

    cysts, are the second most common odontogenic mandibular 

    cysts and the most common developmental cysts of 

    odontogenic origin. They are typically seen in patients aged

    20 – 40. Once fluid accumulates between the enamel organ

    Fig. 1   Radicular cyst.  a  OPT. Unilocular radiolucent lesion with well-

    defined borders (asterisk ) displacing teeth 33 and 34.   b   CT, sagittal

    oblique 2D MPR with bone windows. Cystic lesion surrounding the root 

    (dashed arrow) of the non-vital tooth 34. Associated large caries with

     pulpal necrosis (arrow). c  Histology (haematoxylin-eosin stain, original

    magnification 20×): fibrous connective wall containing a dense chronic

    inflammatory infiltrate and congested vessels (asterisk ) lined by irregular 

    non-keratinised stratified squamous epithelium. Spongiotic epithelium

    (arrows) penetrated by neutrophils

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 87

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    4/17

    remnants and the tooth crown, a cyst forms around the crown

    of the unerupted tooth (typically the lower third molar).

    Imaging features of follicular cysts are characteristic and

    include a unilocular, well-defined radiolucent lesion with

    sclerotic borders around an unerupted tooth crown (Fig.   3).

    Small follicular cysts may be difficult to differentiate from a 

    normal dental follicle. It has been suggested that when the

    distance between the crown and the dental sac is superior to3 mm, the diagnosis of a follicular cyst should be made. The

    cyst is most often attached to the neck of the unerupted and

    displaced tooth, and the crown generally protrudes into the

    cyst while the roots remain outside the lesion (Fig.   3).

    Follicular cysts may become very large [9] and may remodel

    the mandible, predisposing the patient to pathological fracture

    and infection. They may thin the cortical layer of the mandible

    and may insinuate around the mandibular canal, making sur-

    gical excision risky. CT and CBCT are used to determine the

    relationship of the cyst to the mandibular canal prior to sur-

    gery and to assess cyst contents, as well as integrity of the

    cortical rim (Fig. 3). MRI is indicated only in atypical cases to

    differentiate follicular cysts from other cystic mandibular le-

    sions [5]. Follicular cysts will often be found incidentally in

     patients undergoing head and neck MRI for other indications.

    MRI findings include variable signal intensity on T1 due to

    variable protein content within the cyst, high signal on T2 and

    occasionally slight enhancement of the thin cyst wall.

    Although most cysts show no significant FDG uptake on

    PET/CT, mild tracer uptake may be seen in the presence of 

    infection or inflammation [10]. Treatment options include

    enucleation in smaller lesions and marsupialisation in larger 

    cysts. Rarely, SCC ( see   “Pitfalls”) or ameloblastoma may

    arise from the epithelium of the cyst wall [11 – 13]. Multiple

    follicular cysts are very rare and may be seen in cleidocranial

    dysplasia, muccopolysaccharidosis type 4 [9] and in the

    Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.

    Keratocyst 

    Keratocysts, also called primordial cysts, keratinising cysts or 

    keratocystic odontogenic tumours (KCOTs), are benign

    intraosseous tumours arising from the dental lamina [11].

    They are lined by stratified keratinising epithelium. Due to

    their potentially aggressive, infiltrative behaviour, they have a 

    high recurrence rate after surgery (up to 60 %) [1,  14,  15].

    KCOTs are often asymptomatic. They are often misdiagnosed

    as periapical cysts, follicular cysts, lateral periodontal cysts or 

    ameloblastoma [14]. According to the literature, KCOT have

    a periapical position in 33 % of cases, a pericoronal position in

    21 % of cases, a lateral root position in 19 % of cases and arenot related to any dental structures in 27 % of cases [ 14].

    KCOTs essentially occur in the 2nd and 3rd decade in the

     posterior body or in the ascending ramus of the mandible.

    Lesions in the molar and premolar area or in the anterior 

    mandible are less common. Men are affected more commonly

    than women, most KCOTs occurring in Caucasian popula-

    tions of Northern European decent. As KCOTs may become

    very large, they tend to remodel, hollow and expand the

    mandible (Fig. 4). Smaller lesions tend to be unilocular, while

    larger lesions tend to be multilocular. KCOTs show well-

    delineated, sclerotic or scalloped borders, soft-tissue extension

    and daughter cysts. The adjacent teeth are only rarely re-

    sorbed; however, when this is the case, differentiation from

    ameloblastoma may be very difficult on OPT, CT or CBCT.

    As KCOTs contain a cheese-like material, they typically show

    soft tissue density (up to 50 HU) on CT (Fig.  4), while on

    MRI, due to the variable protein content, a low to high signal

    intensity may be seen on T1 and a heterogeneous signal on T2.

    T2 relaxation times in KCOT have been reported to be shorter 

    than in ameloblastoma [5]. Weak enhancement of the uni-

    formly thin and regular cyst walls is noted after injection of 

    gadolinium chelates, thereby facilitating differentiation from

    ameloblastoma [5].

    Multiple KCOTs are seen in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma 

    syndrome (Gorlin-Goltz syndrome), the oral-facial-digital syn-

    drome, the Ehlers Danlos and in the Noonan syndrome [2, 16].

    The Gorlin-Golz syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder 

    manifesting with mental retardation, multiple KCOTs (Fig. 5),

     basocellular carcinomas, bone defects, subcutaneous and falx

    cerebri calcifications. Patients typically have large calvaria,

    midface hypoplasia, high-arched eyebrows and hypertelorism.

    The treatment of choice in KCOTs is complete surgical re-

    moval of the lesion itself, including the commonly associated

    Fig. 2  Residual cyst.  a   OPT.

    Unilocular well-defined lesion

    with sclerotic borders (arrow)

    and missing tooth 36 above.  b

    Histology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 20×):

    non-keratinised stratified

    squamous epithelium (arrow)

    with mild inflammation

    88 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    5/17

    tooth. Careful clinical and radiological post-operative follow-

    up is essential due to the high recurrence rate.

    Ameloblastoma 

    Ameloblastomas are benign but locally invasive, slowly

    growing odontogenic tumours arising from remnants of the

    dental lamina and dental organ or, less frequently, from the

    epithelial lining of an odontogenic cyst [12]. They represent 

    10 % of all odontogenic tumours, most lesions being located

    in the mandible (posterior body and ramus region). Most 

    tumours tend to occur during the 4th – 6th decade and there is

    no sex predilection. Clinical features are non-specific and

     patients may complain of unilateral painless swelling. Very

    often, ameloblastomas are detected incidentally. Although

    classic amelobastomas do not have distant metastases, vari-

    ants with metastatic behaviour despite histologically benign

    features (so-called   “malignant ameloblastoma ”), as well as

    tumours with histologically malignant features but without 

    metastatic potential (so-called   “ameloblastic carcinomas”)

    have been described in the literature [3]. Ameloblastomas

    may be subdivided into four histological types: unicystic,

    multicystic, extraosseous, and desmoplastic [12]. The radio-

    logical appearance depends on the histological type and

    Fig. 3  Dentigerous cyst. a  OPT, b  axial CT with bone windows and  c

    dentascan reconstruction. Unilocular well-defined radiolucent lesion

    (thick arrows) surrounding an unerupted tooth. Immediate vicinity of 

    the mandibular canal (dashed arrow) to the impacted tooth.  d   Three-

    dimensional reconstruction, lateral view showing the relationship of the

    cyst (blue), the unerupted tooth ( green) and the mandibular canal (red ).

    The cyst is attachedat thelevel of thetoothneck andsurrounds thecrown.

    e   Surgical specimen. Characteristic attachment of the cyst at the tooth

    neck (arrows). f  Histology (haematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnifi-

    cation 20×): non keratinising thin epithelial lining (arrow) without rete

     pegs. Fibrous wall (asterisks ) almost completely devoid of inflammatory

    cells

    Fig. 4   Histologically proven KCOT. a  OPT. Axial CT image with bone

    window (b) and soft tissue window (c). Multilocular well-defined radio-

    lucent lesion (asterisk ) with thin, sclerotic borders, cortical scalloping

    (arrow) and resorption of teeth roots. Cyst contents with attenuation

    values of 40 – 50 HU mimicking solid tissue. d  Posterior view of a 3D

    reconstruction showing the relationship between the keratocyst (blue),

    the partially resorbed teeth ( green) and the mandibular canal (red ). The

    mandibular canal can be seen only in the posterior mandible, as it is

    encased by the keratocyst 

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 89

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    6/17

    includes unilocular or multilocular radiolucent lesions (“soap

     bubble” or   “honeycomb” appearance) with sclerotic borders,

    displaced adjacent teeth with root resorption and/or extensive

     bone expansion (Figs. 6 and 7). CTand MRI are used toassess

    tumour contents, integrity of the mandibular cortical rim,

    relationship to the mandibular canal and precise intraosseous

    and soft tissue extension (Figs.   6   and   7). In multicystic

    ameloblastoma, MRI reveals cysts with variable protein con-

    tent. Typically, after injection of gadolinium chelates, MRI

    shows enhancement of solid nodular components, of irregu-

    larly thick septations and of papillary projections (Fig.   6).

    Although differentiation between benign and malignant 

    ameloblastoma may be impossible with CT and MRI, a very

    high FDG uptake on PET/CT strongly suggests malignant 

    ameloblastoma or ameloblastic carcinoma [17]. Treatment 

    consists in complete surgical excision and careful post-

    operative follow-up with imaging is mandatory.

    Simple bone cyst 

    The simple bone cyst (SBC), also known as solitary bone cyst,

    traumatic bone cyst, haemorrhagic cyst or idiopathic bone

    cavity is filled with serous or haemorrhagic fluid and is

    characterised by the absence of an epithelial lining.

    Therefore, SBC is not a true cyst but rather a pseudocyst.

    SBC of the mandible usually occurs secondary to trauma,

    typically after tooth extraction with subsequent intramedullary

    haemorrhage. Most SBCs occur before the age of 20 with

    female predominance [18]. In up to 75 % of all cases, SBCs

    are seen in the marrow of the posterior mandible. Most lesions

    are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on dental

    radiographs. SBC occurs in close proximity to a vital tooth

    and is not associated with bone swelling unless there is

    Fig. 5   Basal cell nevus

    syndrome.  a  OPG. Multiple

    mandibular and maxillary KCOTs

    (asterisks ) associated with

    impacted teeth. b   Intraoperative

    view showing cheese-like

    material within the angulo-

    mandibular lesion (arrow). c

    Surgical specimen showing the

    KCOT (asterisk ) and theassociated tooth (thin long 

    arrow). d   Histology

    (haematoxylin-eosin stain,

    original magnification 40×):

    corrugated (dashed arrows)

     parakeratinised epithelium with

    distinct basal columnar cells with

    inverted polarity (arrows) and flat 

    connective tissue interface

    Fig. 6   Histologically proven multilocular ameloblastoma. a  Axial bone

    window CT image. b   Three-dimensional reconstruction, frontal view. c

    T1-weighted axial image.  d  T1-weighted axial image after injection of 

    gadolinium chelates. Multilocular expansile radiolucency with character-

    istic  “soap bubble” appearance (asterisks ) and major facial deformation.

    Cystic components with variable signal intensity on the unenhnanced T1-

    weighted image suggesting variable protein content. Note variable en-

    hancement of solid components ranging from thin enhancing walls to

    thick enhancing solid portions (arrows)

    90 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    7/17

    associated infection. Surgical exploration may be necessary in

    selected cases to exclude other unilocular radiolucent lesions,

    such as keratocysts. On imaging, most SBCs appear as uni-

    locular, well-defined radiolucent lesions that vary in size.

    Rarely, poorly defined borders are observed. Extension to

    the cortical bone is rare and usually there is no tooth displace-

    ment [18]. The superior margins are irregular and scallop

    around teeth roots. CT and MRI can provide information on

    the haemorrhagic content but the density or signal intensity,

    respectively, may vary depending on the age of the haemor-

    rhage. On MRI, the cysts display a homogeneous intermediate

    signal on T1, homogeneous high signal on T2, and no en-

    hancement after injection of intravenous contrast media.

    Treatment consists of bone curettage, leading to bleeding with

    subsequent scar formation.

    Eosinophilic granuloma of the mandible

    Eosinophilic granuloma (EG) is a benign disease related to

    any of the three forms of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).

    Depending upon the number of lesions and lesion distribution,

    LCH comprises the following groups: unifocal LCH (also

    called EG), multifocal unisystem and multifocal multisystem.

    The combination of diabetes insipidus, lytic bone lesions and

    exophtalmus is known as Hand-Schüller-Christian triad,

    whereas the multifocal multisystem LCH is also called Abt-

    Letterer-Siwe disease (with typical abdominal involvement 

    and poor prognosis) [19]. LCH is caused by clonal prolifera-

    tion of activated dendritic cells and macrophages [20]. Any

     bone can be affected, such as the skull, mandible, ribs and

    long bones, as well as any organ system (lung, skin, spleen,

    lymph nodes, central nervous system). Therefore, cross-

    sectional whole-body imaging is essential for the initial

    work-up of patients with active disease and for post-

    therapeutic follow-up purposes.

    The incidence of mandibular EG constitutes less than 10 %

    of all LCH cases. LCH often affects males in the 1st  – 3rd

    decade, although most cases are seen in children younger than

    15 years of age. Mandibular involvement is seen preferentially

    in the body or angle (Fig.   8). Clinical presentation can be

    silent or non-specific including pain, swelling, fever, general

    malaise, gingival hypertrophy, ulcers of the buccal mucosa,

    limitation of mouth opening or tooth hypermobility and loos-

    ening. Pathological fracture may ensue. Radiologically, EG

     presents as a well-defined radiolucent lesion, with or without 

    reactive sclerosis on OPT; however, an accompanying perios-

    teal reaction is typically seen on CT or CBCT. Occasionally,

    this periosteal reaction may show a sunburst appearance,

    suggesting a more aggressive biological behaviour. If the

    alveolar crest is invaded, a  “scooped out ” appearance is seen;

    when the alveolar bone is destroyed, a   “floating tooth”   ap-

     pearance is observed. EG is often associated with a soft tissue

    mass surrounding the mandible and invading the muscles of 

    mastication. Morphological MRI findings include hypointense

    signal on T1, hyperintense signal on T2 and marked enhance-

    ment after intravenous gadolinium (Fig.  8). In our experience,

    ADC values in EG are usually slightly higher than in malignant 

    lesions (≥1.2×10−3 mm2/s versus±1×10−3 mm2/s). In cases

    Fig. 7  Recurrent multilocular 

    ameloblastoma.  a  OPT showing a 

    well-defined, multilocular 

    radiolucency (arrows) with

    sclerotic borders. b   Resected

    specimen and c   specimen

    radiograph clearly show bony

    expansion, destruction of the

    alveolar ridge and characteristic

    multilocular appearance. dHistology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 20×):

    follicular ameloblastoma with

    squamous metaplasia (red 

    asterisks ) within follicles

    (arrows). Largely fibrous stroma 

    (black asterisks) containing

    scattered lymphocytes

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 91

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    8/17

    with atypical periosteal reaction and poorly defined margins,

    the differential diagnosis includes malignant tumours, such as

    osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma or metastases. Nevertheless,

    well-defined margins on CT, the high signal intensity on T2,

    the strong enhancement, the large area of inflammatory oedema 

    and the moderately high ADC values rather suggest a lesion

    with benign histology (Fig.  8). The value of MRI in patients

    with EG lies in its high sensitivity especially when used in

    conjunction with DWI [20]. PET/CT has been shown to pro-

    vide valuable information for the detection of EG lesions due to

    their high FDG uptake (Fig. 8) and it has been suggested that 

    hybrid PET/MRI may play a pivotal role for the primary

    investigation of paediatric histiocytosis allowing accurate de-

    tection of multifocal multiorgan involvement and for monitor-

    ing treatment response [20]. Despite the relatively charac-

    teristic imaging findings, definitive diagnosis of EG is

    made on samples obtained by biopsy. Treatment modalities

    include surgery, chemotherapy and intralesional injection

    of corticosteroids.

    Giant cell granuloma 

    Giant cell granuloma (GCG) is a benign but occasionally

    aggressive proliferative intraosseous lesion with fibrous tis-

    sue, haemorrhage and haemosiderin deposits, as well as

    characteristic osteoclast-like giant cells. GCG is a rare lesion

    occurring preferentially in young girls or women [1, 21]. The

     posterior mandible is affected more often than the anterior 

    mandible. Multifocal involvement is seen in hyperparathy-

    roidism, cherubism or Noonan syndrome [21, 22]. The most 

    common clinical features are pain, swelling, facial asymmetry

    and paresthesia. Differential diagnosis includes giant cell tu-

    mour, radicular cyst, ameloblastoma, odontogenic tumour and

    fibrous dysplasia. The typical radiological appearance is that 

    of a multilocular (less often unilocular) well-defined radiolu-

    cent lesion. However, ill-defined lesions have also been re-

     ported. In some cases, bone may be expanded or teeth can be

    displaced or resorbed. CT, CBCT and MRI are useful for 

    describing bony involvement and for evaluating extension

    into the adjacent soft tissues. On MRI, GCG has a homoge-

    neous or slightly heterogeneous intermediate signal on T1, T2

    and STIR (short TI inversion recovery) and shows moderate

    to strong contrast enhancement after administration of gado-

    linium. However, it is important to note that only very few

    data regarding the imaging characteristics of GCG are cur-

    rently available in the literature. The treatment of choice is

    surgery (enucleation and curettage in well-defined GCG or en

     bloc resection in aggressive GCG) and medical treatment 

    (intralesional corticosteroid or calcitonin injections) [21].

    Recurrence may occur in up to 15 % of cases.

    Fig. 8   Histologically proven eosinophilic granuloma. a  OPT-like curved

    thick slab reconstruction,  b  axial CT bone window and (c) 3D recon-

    struction from CT data set show a well-defined radiolucent lesion (ar-

    rows ) located in the angle of the mandible. Sharply delineated slightly

    sclerotic borders. Periosteal reaction (dashed arrow). d PET/CTshowing

    that high FDG uptake within the posterior mandible and perimandibular 

    soft tissues (arrow). SUVmean = 6, SUVmax = 9.  e  Axial T2 and   f 

    sagittal T1 after intravenous gadolinium show a large extraosseous com-

     ponent (arrows) with invasion of the masseter muscle. Close vicinity to

    the submandibulat gland. Note high signal intensity on T2 and strong

    enhancement after gadolinium. g  Fused T2 and b  1,000 showing restrict-

    ed diffusion. h   ADC map showing a moderately low ADC value (ADC =

    1.21×10−3 mm2/s, arrow) within the lesion. Note inflammatory oedema

    around the lesion with high ADC values ( asterisk )

    92 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    9/17

    Radiolucent lesions with ill-defined borders

    Osteomyelitis

    Despite the introduction of antibiotics and improved medical

    care, osteomyelitis of the jaws is still relatively common. The

    mandible is affected more often than the maxilla. Depending

    on the clinical course, osteomyelitis of the mandible can beclassified into three forms: acute, secondary chronic and pri-

    mary chronic [23, 24]. The acute and secondary chronic forms

    are manifestations of the same disease entity separated by the

    arbitrary time limit of 1 month. These two forms are typically

    caused by bacterial infection in the setting of pulpal or peri-

    odontal infection, mandibular foreign bodies, sepsis or trau-

    ma. In dental infection, pulpal infection extends into the bone

    marrow and there is compression of blood vessels from

     periapical lesions. Acute forms present with severe symptoms

    such as pain, swelling, fever, lymphadenopathy or a mobile

    tooth sensitive to percussion. They may also present with

     paresthesia in the lower lip (V3 nerve), trismus or fistula with pus and — in advanced stages — osteomyelitis may also be

    revealed by pathological fractures. The chronic forms are

    clinically silent but often include painful periods.

    Predisposing factors are diabetes, immunosuppression, radio-

    therapy and bisphosphonates.

    While the diagnosis of osteomyelitis can be made clinically

    in many cases, imaging is especially helpful to define the

    extent and assess the severity of the lesion. The radiological

    appearance of osteomyelitis depends on the stage of disease. It 

    consists of an ill-defined osteolytic lesion (Fig.  9), with bone

    sequestra, and — in subacute cases — is often associated scle-

    rosis and periosteal new bone formation. CT is helpful to

    analyse the bone structure, to search for associated abscessesand to identify soft tissue extension (myositis, fasciitis, cellu-

    litis). MRI findings in osteomyelitis are similar to those in

    osteoradionecrosis (Fig. 9) and the differentiation between the

    two entities is based on the clinical context. MRI is more

    sensitive than CT in detecting marrow and soft tissue involve-

    ment [25]. In addition, MRI allows earlier diagnosis of oste-

    omyelitis than CT, CBCT or conventional radiographs. In

    general, the disease extent appears larger on MRI than on

    CT; therefore, a combined MRI and CT assessment is most 

    often required pre-operatively. Osteomyelitis lesions show

    low signal on T1, and high signal on T2 and STIR images

    due to oedema of the bony marrow; variable degrees of contrast enhancement of the marrow itself and of adjacent soft 

    tissues are equally observed (Fig. 9). The signal intensity of 

     bone sequestrae, however, is very low on all sequences.

    Treatment consists of a combination of antibiotics and surgical

    debridement.

    Fig.9   Osteomyelitisafter tooth extraction. a OPT. b  Contrast-enhanced,

    axial CT image with bone window settings. c  Three-dimensional recon-

    struction. Ill-defined osteolytic area (asterisks ) extending into the ascend-

    ing ramus of the mandible, with cortical destruction (arrows in  b  and  c ).

    d  Axial T1-weighted image before (d) and after (e) injection of gadolin-

    ium chelates. Hypointense signal of the mandible (arrows   in  d ) due to

    marrow oedema and strong enhancement (arrows   in   e ) due to

    hyperaemia. Myositis of the masseter muscle (thick dashed arrow) and

    streaky enhancement of the subcutaneous fat and platysma muscle (thin

    dashed arrow) suggesting a phlegmon. f   Histology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 20×): non-viable trabeculae (large asterisks)

    with bone resorption and destroyed osteoblasts. Inflammatory infiltrate

    ( small asterisks) with neutrophils and lymphocytes as well as increased

    vascularisation within the fatty marrow

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 93

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    10/17

    Bisphosphonate osteonecrosis

    Bisphosphonate treatment, similar to radiotherapy, may cause

     bone necrosis. Bisphosphonates are widely used for the treat-

    ment of cancer-related symptoms. Their benefits consist in

    reducing hypercalcaemia, limiting progression of bone lesions

    and preventing pathological fractures in bone metastases from

     breast, prostate and lung cancer, as well as multiple myeloma [26]. In short, bisphosphonates are widely indicated to im-

     prove the quality of life in a large number of patients.

    Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ)

    was defined by the American Association of Oral and

    Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) based on three criteria:

     past or current bisphosphonate treatment, osteonecrosis last-

    ing for at least 8 weeks and no history of radiotherapy to the

     jaw. [26]. BRONJ most often occurs in the mandible rather 

    than the maxilla, especially in the molar region, and is fre-

    quently triggered by a pre-existing focal lesion. Clinical fea-

    tures include painful swelling, signs of infection (fever, oozing

     pus, abscess and soft tissue inflammation) and a mobile toothsensitive to percussion. Occasionally, there is paresthesia in

    the lower lip (whenever V3 is affected) or trismus. Imaging

    features of BRONJ are the same as for osteoradionecrosis

    (Fig. 10). MRI can show signal changes on T1 and T2 images

    according to the stage of the disease. Although radiological

    findings are easily identified, they are non-specific and the

    final diagnosis is made by combining imaging findings with

    the clinical context [27].

    Osteoradionecrosis

    Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a serious uncommon complica-

    tion (2.6-15 %) of radiotherapy in head and neck cancer 

     patients. It usually occurs 5-15 years after radiotherapy. Therisk of developing ORN increases with poor oral hygiene,

    alcohol and tobacco use after radiotherapy, tooth extraction

    or periodontal disease prior to radiotherapy: ORN is also

    related to the nutritional status of the patient. ORN preferen-

    tially affects the molar, premolar and retromolar region.

    Depending on the radiation portal and the administered radi-

    ation dose, osteoradionecrosis may affect the mandible unilat-

    erally or bilaterally. Combined treatment options (radiation

    therapy, surgery and chemotherapy) appear to predispose to

    ORN [28]. Clinical manifestations include pain, limitation of 

    mouth opening and deep ulcerations with denuded bone. In

    advanced stages, trismus, fistulas and pathological fractureshave also been reported. CT usually reveals a patchy

    radiopaque-radiolucent ill-defined lesion with cortical bone de-

    struction, usually without periosteal reaction (Fig.  11). Typical

    MRI findings are a mixture of marrow oedema (increased signal

    on T2) and marrow sclerosis (reduced signal on T2) with

    fragmentation of bone and sequestration (very low signal on

    Fig. 10   Biphosphonate osteonecrosis.   a   OPT;   b   3D reconstruction

    anteo-lateral view. Contrast-enhanced axial CT image with bone window

    settings (c ) and soft tissuesettings (d). Poorly defined osteolytic lesion of 

    the left mandibular body (thick white arrows) with partly sclerotic mar-

    gins (thin arrows  in  a ) and large osseous defect (red arrows  in  b ). Bone

    sequestra (dashed arrows). Associated subperiosteal phlegmon and myo-

    sitis of the platysma (open arrows).   e  Histology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 20×): necrotic bone (large asterisk ) with

    inflammatory infiltration of the fatty marrow ( small asterisks). Gingival

    mucosa (arrows)

    94 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    11/17

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    12/17

    diagnosis includes osteoid osteoma, ossifying fibroma,

     periapical cemental dysplasia, fibrous dysplasia, as well as

    other fibro-osseous lesions. Osteoid osteoma typically presents

    with pain and a nidus can be identified at CT or CBCT.

    Ossifying fibroma most commonly occurs in the posterior 

    mandible during the 3rd – 4th decades [1]. Depending on the

    degree of calcification, the radiological appearance includes

    well-defined radiolucent, radiopaque or mixed opacity lesions

    [1]. Commonly, a radiolucent margin is seen on CT or CBCT,

    allowing differentiation from fibrous dysplasia. Periapical

    cemental dysplasia typically occurs in women during the 4th

    and 5th decades. It is the consequence of connective tissue

     proliferation within the periodontal membrane; therefore, the

    lesions are typically located in vicinity of tooth apices [1].

    Initially, the lesions are radiolucent and with increasing matu-

    rity, there is advanced calcification. As opposed to mandibular 

    osteoblastoma and osteoid osteoma, many fibro-osseous lesions

    do not cause pain despite their large size or associated teeth

    displacement. In addition, the age of presentation, the multi-

     plicity of lesions and the relationship to tooth apices are further 

    elements that help in the differential diagnosis. The treatment of 

    choice in osteoblastoma is surgery and recurrence is rare [31].

    Some cases of spontaneous regression have been reported,

    especially in young patients.

    SCC with mandibular invasion

    SCC, also known as epidermoid carcinoma, is a malignant 

    neoplasm arising from the mucosa of the oral cavity [32, 33].

    It is the most common tumour of the oral cavity and prefer-

    entially affects men over the age of 50. SCC most often occurs

    in the mucosa overlying the posterior mandible, and it is

    related to the consumption of alcohol and tobacco. It has high

    metastatic potential. Clinical symptoms include pain, swell-

    ing, paresthesia (due to V3 invasion) and dental disorders. In

    advanced stages, SCC may be discovered in the context of a 

     pathological fracture. The radiological appearance is that of an

    aggressive soft-tissue lesion with invasion of the floor of the

    mouth, alveolar ridge or retromolar trigone [33]. In advanced

    stages, secondary bone invasion can occur leading to the

    appearance of an ill-defined radiolucent lesion of the mandible

    on conventional X-rays; in advanced lesions, the   “floating

    teeth”  sign may be equally observed due to extensive man-

    dibular infiltration. On MRI, SCC displays a low to interme-

    diate signal on T1, a moderately high signal on T2 and STIR 

    sequences, and a moderate enhancement after injection of 

    contrast media (Fig. 14). ADC values are typically low (usu-

    ally around 1 – 1.1×10−3 mm2/s). Whenever large areas of 

    necrosis are present within the tumour, ADC values may,

    however, be higher. This is particularly true in necrotic lymph

    node metastases (Fig. 14). Lymph node metastases in SCC of 

    the oral cavity are common, especially in level I and II nodes.

    On FDG PET/CTor PET/MRI, SUV values are typically high

    due to the high glucose metabolism (Fig.   14). The final

    diagnosis and the pre-therapeutic work-up in SCC of the oral

    cavity are made by a combined clinical, imaging and histo-

    logical work-up. The main role of imaging consists in precise-

    ly depicting deep tumour spread, as well as detecting lymph

    Fig. 13   Osteoblastoma. a   OPT.

    b  Axial CT with bone window.

    c  Sagittal oblique contrast-

    enhanced fat-saturated T1-

    weighted image. Ill-defined

    radiolucent lesion (arrows  in  a

    and b ) with coarse sclerotic

     borders and calcifications (dashed 

    arrow). Major contrast 

    enhancement (arrow  in  c ). dHistology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 64×).

    Osteoid and woven bone

    (asterisk ) with plump osteoblast-

    like cells (arrows), interposed

    fibroblasts and some

    inflammatory cells

    96 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    13/17

    node and distant metastases. Surgery with or without radio-

    therapy is the treatment of choice. Prognosis depends on the

    histological type and on the presence or absence of lymph

    node metastases.

    Metastases

    Metastases to the jaw are an uncommon entity, affecting the

    mandible more often than the maxilla [34]. The most common

     primaries vary depending upon gender. Lung, prostate, kidney

    and liver tumours are the most common primaries in men,

    whereas breast, adrenal, gynaecological and colorectal tu-

    mours are the most common primaries in women [34].

    Typical clinical symptoms include pain (Fig.   15), swelling,

     paresthesia, temporomandibular joint derangement, but in

    some cases metastases to the jaw are clinically silent and

    found incidentally. The radiological appearance includes ill-

    defined radiolucent lesions with no periosteal reaction on

    conventional X-rays, CT and CBCT [35]. MRI reveals mod-

    erately hyperintense masses on T2-weighted and STIR im-

    ages, hypointense signal on T1-weighted images and variable

    degrees of contrast enhancement. In general, the surrounding

    soft tissues lack relevant oedema and enhancement unless

    tumour extension beyond the mandible has occurred

    (Fig. 15). On PET/CT, focal areas of increased FDG uptake

    are typically observed and measured SUVs are high (Fig. 15).

    Although the imaging aspect is not specific, in the presence of 

    a patient with a history of cancer, the diagnosis of mandibular 

    metastasis should be considered in the differential diagnosis

    first, particularly when the lesion shows no relationship to

    dental structures.

    Pitfalls

    Pseudolesions

    Stafne cyst 

    Stafne cyst, also called static bone cavity or salivary gland

    inclusion defect, is a pseudocyst arising from bone remodel-

    ling caused by the adjacent submandibular gland. Therefore, it 

    does not present any epithelial lining. Stafne cysts are often

    incidental findings, as patients are asymptomatic (Fig.   16).

    The lesions are more common in men than in women. The

    radiological aspect includes ovoid, well-defined radiolucent 

    cortical defects on the lingual surface of the posterior mandi-

     ble usually measuring less than 2 cm. This location is typical

    Fig. 14   SCC with mandibular invasion. Precise pre-operative assess-

    ment with MRI and PET/CT.  a  OPT. Poorly defined bony destruction

    (arrow) of the edentulous mandible.   b   Contrast-enhanced axial CT.

    Aggressive soft-tissue lesion (arrow) with secondary bone invasion.  c

    Sagittal oblique PET/CT image. High metabolism of the tumour (black 

    asterisk , SUVmean = 18, SUVmax = 22) and of two metastatic level I

    lymph nodes (arrows, SUVmean = 10, SUVmax = 15). d   T2-weighted

    axial image. Tumour (asterisk ) with marrow invasion and extensive

    infiltration of the floor of the mouth (dashed arrow). Note two metastatic

    level I lymph nodes (arrows).   e   The   b   1,000 and   f   ADC map show

    restricted diffusion within the tumour (circle, ADC = 0.98×10−3 mm2/s).

    Variable ADC values within the metastatic lymph nodes due to the

     presence of necrosis (arrows   in  f ).  g  Sagittal histological whole-organ

    slice of the resected specimen. Tumour (dashed black line) invading the

    mandible (black arrows) and the muscles (asterisk ) of the floor of the

    mouth. The histological slice has the same orientation as (c )

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 97

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    14/17

    and the lesion contains fat or salivary gland tissue. An OPT is

    sufficient for diagnosis but occasionally CT or MRI can be

     performed in cases of atypical presentation to exclude an

    ameloblastoma or a traumatic bone cyst [2]. No treatment is

    recommended; however, a follow-up examination at 3 – 

    6 months can be performed to ascertain lesion stability [3].

    Malignant lesions mimicking benign disease

     Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma

    The vast majority of mucoepidermoid carcinomas arise within

    the major or minor salivary glands. Primary intraosseous

    mucoepidermoid carcinoma is an extremely rare tumour con-

    stituting less than 2 % of all mucoepidermoid carcinomas. It 

    arises centrally within the angle or posterior mandible [36]. Its

    aetiopathogenesis is not yet completely understood. Due to the

     paucity of cases reported in the literature, little is known re-

    garding age of presentation and sex distribution. Clinical fea-

    tures include swelling and pain, as well as trismus. Imaging

    features are unilocular or multilocular, well-defined lesions with

    sclerotic borders, mimicking a benign cyst, a keratocyst or an

    ameloblastoma on OPT, CT and CBCT [37]. On MRI, the

    cystic tumour components display a low signal on T1, a high

    signal on T2 and no enhancement, whereas the nodular solid

    tumour components present a low signal on T2 and contrast 

    Fig. 15   Condylar metastasis

    from adenocarcinoma. OPT (a)

    with osteolytic ill-defined lesion

    of the mandibular condyle

    (arrow). b  Sagittal PET/CT

    image shows high metabolism

    with SUV = 12 (arrow). c  Axial,

    contrast-enhanced, fat-saturated

    T1-weighted image. The

    infiltrative, bulky lesion invadesthe condyle (arrow), the internal

     pterygoid muscle (dashed arrow)

    and part of the parotid gland (thin

    arrow). d   Intraoperative view.

    Extensive condylar involvement.

    e   Histology (haematoxylin-eosin

    stain, original magnification 80×):

    large atypical polygonal cells,

    some with several nuclei (arrow)

    Fig. 16   Stafne cyst discovered

    incidentally.  a  OPT-like

    reconstruction from CBCT data 

    set showing a well-defined,

    unilocular radiolucency (arrow)

    with sclerotic borders in the

    region of 37 and 38. No

    relationship to teeth.  b  Axial,c  coronal and d  3D

    reconstruction, posterior view.

    Bony defect (arrows) in

    characteristic location

    98 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    15/17

    material enhancement. Extension into the muscles of mastica-

    tion is common, as well as loco-regional lymph node metasta-

    ses. MRI essential to narrow the differential diagnosis, as OPT

    and CT are non-specific. The presence of a destructive,

    infiltrative pattern with enhancing nodules within the cyst wall,

    as well as the presence of metastatic lymph nodes strongly

    suggests a malignant tumour, thus making biopsy mandatory.

     Primary intraosseous SCC 

    Primary intraosseous SCC is a very rare neoplasm resulting

    from the malignant transformation of the epithelial lining of a residual cyst, follicular cyst or a keratocyst [13, 38]. In con-

    sequence, as a general rule, following enucleation of any

    cystic lesion in the mandible, a thorough examination of the

    entire surgical specimen is mandatory to exclude the possibil-

    ity of an intramural SCC that may have been overlooked pre-

    operatively [39,  40]. Primary intraosseous SCC has a predi-

    lection for men and typically occurs in the 6th – 8th decade.

    There are less than 120 cases described in the literature. These

    tumours are aggressive lesions with a high metastatic poten-

    tial. Due to the non-specific clinical findings, most 

    intraosseous SCCs tend to be diagnosed at later stages.

    Panoramic radiographs, CT and CBCT findings mimic benignfollicular cysts (Fig. 17) or radicular cysts. MRI and PET/CT

    are the only modalities suggesting a malignant tumour.

    Imaging findings on MRI are similar to those of intraosseous

    mucoepidermoid carcinoma: solid tumour portions have low-

    er signal on T2, whereas cystic portions display a high signal.

    Enhancement of solid portions is typically seen after injection

    of contrast material, as well as infiltration into the

     perimandibular soft-tissues. ADC values of solid parts are

    low, suggesting tumour components with high cellularity

    (Fig. 17). On PET/CT, a high FDG uptake may be seen similar 

    to SCC arising from the mucosa of the upper aero-digestive

    Fig. 17   Intracystic carcinoma. a  Sagittal oblique and b axial CBCTimage

    displaying the characteristic aspect of a dentigerous cyst with well-defined

    cyst borders (arrows). The cyst surrounds the crown of an impacted tooth.

    c   T2-weighted image: solid intracystic component with moderately high

    signal intensity (arrows). Fluid with high signal intensity within the cyst 

    (dashed arrow). Oedema in the masseter muscle (asterisk ). d   ADC map

    with low ADC values (circle) of solid parts (ADC = 0.89×10−3 mm2/s)

    suggesting an intracystic malignant tumour despite the benign appearance

    on CBCT. Histology revealed SCC arising within a dentigerous cyst 

    Fig. 18  Mandibular NHL.

    a  OPT. Difficulty to accurately

    identify the lesion due its median

    and paramedian position and the

    typical anterior OPT artefact 

    (arrowheads) masking the lesion.

    Subtle enlargement of the right 

    mental foramen (long arrow)

    compared with the normal

    contralateral side ( short arrow).

    b , c  T1-weighted unenhanced

    axial images. d   T1-weighted

    fat-saturated contrast-enhanced

    sagittal image. Large infiltrativelesion (asterisks ) extending from

    the vestibule through the

    mandible into the floor of the

    mouth (arrows). The mandibular 

    cortical rim is mostly preserved

    although the lesion shows diffuse

    marrow infiltration

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 99

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    16/17

    tract. Treatment consists of surgery with and without addition-

    al radiotherapy.

    Malignant lesions that may be missed on OPT

     Mandibular lymphoma

    Lymphomas are malignant tumours developed from cells of the lymphatic system and can therefore affect any organ

    containing lymphoid tissue. While Hodgkin lymphomas

    (HL) most often involve lymph nodes in the head and neck,

    non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) can equally affect extra-

    nodal sites [41] such as the lacrimal glands, salivary glands,

    muscles and soft tissues of the orbit, thyroid gland, maxilla 

    and mandible. Mandibular NHL is very rare. As it is frequent-

    ly mistaken for dental infection, a prolonged delay in diagno-

    sis can occur. All age groups can be affected, however adults

    tend to be affected more often than children. There is no

    gender predilection. The clinical features of mandibular 

     NHL are not specific and include pain, jaw swelling, ulcera-tion, tooth mobility and cervical lymphadenopathy. On pano-

    ramic views, mandibular NHLs appear as ill-defined radiolu-

    cent lesions. Despite their large size, the tumours can be easily

    missed on conventional X-rays (Fig.  18). Radiological find-

    ings can be quite subtle such as teeth displacement in the

    occlusal direction and loss of the lamina dura with widening

    of the periodontal ligament space [41]. Rarely, mandibular 

     NHL can present with minor osteolysis or with unilateral

    enlargement of the mandibular canal and mental foramen

    (Fig.  18). Enlargement of the mandibular canal and mental

    foramen is rare and has been reported in neurogenic tumours

    affecting the inferior alveolar nerve (schwannoma and neuro-

    fibroma), in perineural spread of disease (mainly from SCC,

    adenoid cystic carcinoma and lymphoma) and as an anatomic

    variant mimicking pathology [42]. In our experience, in man-

    dibular NHL, CT and MRI typically show minor or no

    destruction of the cortical bone despite extensive infiltration

    of the bony marrow and of the perimandibular soft tissues

    (Fig.   18). As suggested in the literature, MRI provides

    superior visualisation of submucosal tumour extension and

    improved assessment of marrow infiltration compared with

    CT or CBCT [43]. Low signal on T1 and T2, homogenous

    contrast enhancement after injection of gadolinium chelates,

    absent areas of necrosis despite the large size (Fig. 18) and low

    ADC values (typically 0.6 – 0.8×10−3 mm2/s) are characte-

    ristic findings. On PET/CT, mandibular NHL display high

    FDG uptake and high SUV values (usually  ≥10 – 15), similar 

    to lymphomas in other locations in the body. The differential

    diagnosis of mandibular NHL includes other infiltrative

     processes such as myeloma, leukaemia and bone metastases,

    making biopsy mandatory for the correct histological

    diagnosis. Treatment in mandibular NHL is done with

    chemo(radio)therapy.

    Conclusions

    The vast majority of radiolucent lesions of the mandible seen

    on conventional radiographs represent benign lesions that 

    require no further work-up. Nevertheless, certain radiological

    features, such as large lesion size, bone scalloping, relation-

    ship to an impacted tooth or the mandibular canal, tooth

    resorption, as well as ill-defined lesion borders, require further radiological work-up. CT, CBCT, MRI and PET/CT are of 

    additional help if the nature of the lesion is unclear and for the

    identification of those lesions, where biopsy is indicated for 

    definitive histology.

    Open Access  This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative

    Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and

    reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the

    source are credited.

    References

    1. Dunfee BL, Sakai O, Pistey R, Gohel A (2006) Radiologic and

     pathologic characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of the

    mandible. Radiographics 26:1751 – 1768

    2. Devenney-Cakir B, Subramaniam RM, Reddy SM, Imsande H,

    Gohel A, Sakai O (2011) Cystic and cystic-appearing lesions of the

    mandible: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:WS66 – WS77. doi:10.

    2214/AJR.09.7216

    3. Scholl RJ, Kellett HM, Neumann DP, Lurie AG (1999) Cysts and

    cystic lesions of the mandible: clinical and radiologic-histopathologic

    review. Radiographics 19:1107 – 1124

    4. Cotti E, Campisi G (2004) Advanced radiographic techniques for the

    detection of lesions in bone. Endod Top 7:52 – 72

    5. Minami M, Kaneda T, Ozawa K, Yamamoto H, Itai Y, Ozawa M et al

    (1996) Cystic lesions of the maxillomandibular region: MR imaging

    distinction of odontogenic keratocysts and ameloblastomas from

    other cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:943 – 949

    6. Schuknecht BF, Carls FR, Valavanis A, Sailer HF (1997) Mandibular 

    osteomyelitis: evaluation and staging in 18 patients, using magnetic

    resonance imaging, computed tomography and conventional radio-

    graphs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 25:24 – 33

    7. Varoquaux A, Rager O, Lovblad KO, Masterson K, Dulguerov P,

    Ratib O et al (2013) Functional imaging of head and neck squamous

    cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT:

    quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV. Eur J Nucl Med Mol

    Imaging 40:842 – 852

    8. Varoquaux A, Rager O, Poncet A, Delattre BM, Ratib O, Becker CDet al (2013) Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and

    neck tumours: F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT. EurJ Nucl Med Mol

    Imaging. doi:10.1007/s00259-013-2580-y

    9. Freitas DQ, Tempest LM, Sicoli E, Lopes-Neto FC (2006) Bilateral

    dentigerous cysts: review of the literature and report of an unusual

    case. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:464 – 468

    10. Maeda T, Tateishi U, Terauchi T et al (2007) Unsuspected bone and

    soft tissue lesions identified at cancer screening using positron emis-

    sion tomography. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:207 – 215

    11. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D (2005) World Health

    Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics of 

    head and neck tumours. IARC Press, Lyon

    100 Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101

    http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7216http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7216http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2580-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2580-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7216http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7216

  • 8/17/2019 Radiolucent Lesions of Jaw

    17/17

    12. Sham E, Leong J, Maher R, Schenberg M, Leung M, Mansour AK 

    (2009) Mandibular ameloblastoma: clinical experience and literature

    review. ANZ J Surg 79:739 – 744

    13. Colbert S, Brennan PA, Theaker J, Evans B (2012) Squamous cell

    carcinoma arising in dentigerous cysts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:

    e355 – e357

    14. Ali M, Baughman RA (2003) Maxillary odontogenic keratocyst. J

    Am Dent Assoc 134:877 – 883

    15. Shear M (2003) Odontogenic keratocysts: natural history and immu-

    nohistochemistry. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 15:347 – 36216. Lindeboom JA, Kroon FH, de Vires J, van den Akker HP (2003)

    Multiple recurrent and de novo odontogenic keratocysts associated

    with oral-facial-digital syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol

    Oral Radiol Endod 95:458 – 462

    17. Nguyen BD (2005) Malignant ameloblastoma with thoracic vertebral

    metastasis: PET/CT and MR imaging. Clin Nucl Med 30:450 – 452

    18. Sabino-Bezerra JR et al (2012) Atypical presentations of simple bone

    cysts of the mandible: a case series and review of literature. J

    Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:391 – 396. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.002

    19. Lee BD, Lee W, Lee J, Son HJ (2013) Eosinophilic granuloma in the

    anterior mandible mimicking radicular cyst. Imaging Sci Dent 43:

    117 – 122

    20. Mueller WP, Melzer HI, Schmid I, Coppenrath E, Bartenstein P,

    Pfluger T (2013) The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and MRI

    in paediatric histiocytosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:356 – 363

    21. Schutz P, El-Bassuoni KH, Munish J, Hamed HH, Padwa BL (2010)

    Aggressive central giant cell granuloma of the mandible. J Oral

    Maxillofac Surg 68:2537 – 2544

    22. Gupta M, Singh S, Kaur R (2013) Central giant cell granuloma of the

    maxilla. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-009102

    23. Van Schuppen J, van Doorn MM, van Rijn RR (2012) Childhood

    osteomyelitis: imaging characteristics. Insights Imaging 3:519 – 533

    24. Baltensperger M, Eyrich GK (2008) Definition and classification. In:

    Baltensperger M, Eyrich GK (eds) Osteomyelitis of the jaws.

    Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 5 – 50

    25. Pincus DJ, Armstrong MB, Thaller SR (2009) Osteomyelitis of the

    craniofacial skeleton. Semin Plast Surg 23:73 – 79. doi:10.1055/s-

    0029-1214159

    26. Advisory Task Force on Bisphosphonate-Related Ostenonecrosis of 

    the Jaws, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

    (2007) American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

     position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J

    Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:369 – 376

    27. Bisdas S, Chambron Pinho N, Smolarz A, Sader R, Vogl TJ, Mack 

    MG (2008) Biphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: CT

    and MRI spectrum of findings in 32 patients. Clin Radiol 63:71 – 77

    28. Becker M, Schroth G, Zbären P, Delavelle J, Allal A, Greiner R,

    Rüfenacht DA, Vock P, Terrier F (1997) Long-term changes induced

     by high-dose irradiation of the head and neck region: imaging find-

    ings. Radiographics 17:5 – 26

    29. Chong J, Hinckley LK, Ginsberg LE (2000) Masticator space abnor-

    malities associated with mandibular osteoradionecrosis: MR and CT

    findings in five patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:175 – 178

    30. Lambade PN, Lambade D, Goel M (2013) Osteoradionecrosis of the

    mandible: a review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:243-249. doi:10.1007/ 

    s10006-012-0363-4

    31. Kaur H, Verma S, Jawanda MK, Sharma A (2012) Aggressive

    osteoblastoma of the mandible: a diagnostic dilemma. Dent Res J

    (Isfahan) 9:334 – 337

    32. Jimi E, Furuta H, Matsuo K, Tominaga K, Takahashi T, Nakanishi O(2010) The cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone invasion by

    oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Dis 17:462 – 468. doi:10.1111/j.

    1601-0825.2010.01781.x

    33. Trotta BM, Pease CS, Rasamny JJ, Raghavan P, Mukherjee S (2011)

    Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: key imaging

    findings for staging and treatment planning. Radiographics 31:339 – 

    354

    34. Barnes L (2009) Metastases of the head and neck: an overview. Head

     Neck Pathol 3:217 – 224

    35. Scolozzi P, Becker M, Lombardi T (2012) Mandibular condylar 

    metastasis mimicking acute internal derangement of the temporo-

    mandibular joint. J Can Dent Assoc 78:c77

    36. Raut D, Khedkar S (2009) Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoid

    carcinoma of the maxilla: a case report and review of literature.

    Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:163 – 168

    37. Martínez-Madrigal F, Pineda-Daboin K, Casiraghi O, Luna MA

    (2000) Salivary gland tumors of the mandible. Ann Diagn Pathol 4:

    347 – 353

    38. Bodner L, Manor E, Shear M, van der Waal I (2011) Primary

    intraosseous squamouscell carcinoma arising in an odontogenic cyst:

    a clinicopathologic analysis of 116 reported cases. J Oral Pathol Med

    40:733 – 738

    39. Nomura T, Monobe H, Tamaruya N, Kishishita S, Saito K, Miyamoto

    R, Nakao K (2013) Primary intraosseous squamous cell carcinoma of 

    the jaw: two new cases and review of the literature. Eur Arch

    Otorhinolaryngol 270:375 – 379. doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2235-9

    40. Manor E, Kachko L, Puterman MB, Szabo G, Bodner L (2012)

    Cystic lesions of the jaws — a clinicopathological study of 322 cases

    and review of the literature. Int J Med Sci 9:20 – 26

    41. Gonzalez-Fontal GR, Rosales JD, Jaramillo R, Henao-Martinez AF

    (2011) Primary extranodal, extralymphatic Hodgkin lymphoma of 

    the mandible. Case Rep Med 2011:387570. doi:10.1155/2011/ 

    387570

    42. Terzic A, Becker M, Imholz B, Scolozzi P (2013) Unilateral widen-

    ing of the inferior alveolar nerve canal: a rare anatomic variant 

    mimicking disease. Oral Radiol 29:160 – 165

    43. Imaizumi A, Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Ohbayashi N, Nakamura 

    S, Sumi Y et al (2012) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma involving the

    mandible: imaging findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral

    Radiol 113:e33 – e39

    Insights Imaging (2014) 5:85 – 101 101

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009102http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214159http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214159http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0363-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0363-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01781.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01781.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2235-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/387570http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/387570http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/387570http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/387570http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2235-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01781.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01781.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0363-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0363-4http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214159http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214159http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009102http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.002