Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program I ~ -FEMA I · Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 27,

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

River Bend Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan

Exercise Date - June 27, 2018 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program

~ - FEMA 4 \f '\\

Published September 10, 2018

Unclassified 11 Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan I I I I I I I

This page is intentionally blank. I I I I I I I I I

2 I I


Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan

Table of Contents

After Action Report/Improvement Planl EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............. : .......... ; ............................................................................................. 5

SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 6

1.1 Exercise Details ..................................................................................................................................... 6

1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership ......................................................................................................... 6

1.3 Part_icipating Organizations .................................................................................................................... 8

SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 10

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design ................................................................................................................ 10

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities ............................................................................ : ........ 10

2.3 Scenario Summary ............................................................................................ ; .................................. 10

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES ............................................................................................. 11

3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results ................................................................. , ......................................... 11

3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation ............................................................................................... 11

3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries •••....••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••.•..•••••••••••••.•.•••.•...•.•..•...••.•.•.•.•...•.•....•. 14

SECTION 4: CONCLUSION .................................................................... .' ............................................ 24

APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................. 25

APPENDIX B: EXERCISE TIMELINE ..................................................................................................... 26

APPENDIX C: EXERCISE EVALUATORS ............................................................................................... 27

APPENDIX D: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................... 29

APPENDIX E: EXERCISE PLAN ............................................................................................................ 32

3

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan I I I

This page is intentionally blank. I I I I I I I I I I' I I ,I

4 I I




EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On June 27, 2018, a biennial Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Plume Exposure Pathway exercise was conducted around the River Bend Station (RBS), located near St. Francisville, Louisiana. Personnel from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management Agency (DHS/FEMA) Region VI, evaluated all activities. Th{, purpose of the exercise was to assess the level of preparedness of State and local responders to react to a simulated radiological emergency at RBS. It was held in accordance with FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the implementation of state and local REP plans and procedures.

The previous exercise at this site was conducted on June 29, 2016. The first qualifying exercise to satisfy FEMA rule 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 350 requirements for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing to operate the facility was conducted in January 1985. Including the exercise on June 27, 2018, there have been nineteen DHS/FEMA Region VI evaluated exercises plus several drills conducted since then.

FEMA Region VI wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many individuals in the State of Louisiana, West Feliciana, East Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, East Baton Rouge and West Baton Rouge Parishes who participated in this exercise. Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. ~till others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities. Cooperation and teamwork of all the participants was evident during this exercise ..

This report includes the identification of any exercise findings and recommendations for corrective action where appropriate. All state and local organizations, except where noted in this report, demonstrated an adequate knowledge of the emergency response plans and procedures ' and properly implemented them. There were no Le\7el 1 Findings, two Level 2 Findings that were corrected during the exercise, and one Plan Issue identified during the exercise. Also, one previous Level 2 Finding was resolved during the exercise.

5

U nclassitied Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)


SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW

1.1 Exercise Details

Exercise Name 2018 River Bend Station Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program Evaluated Exercise

Type of Exercise Plume

Exercise Date June 27, 2018

Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program

Scenario Type Radiological Emergency

1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership

Nan Williams RAC Chair FEMA Region 6 800 North Loop 288 Denton, TX, 76209 (940) 898-5398 nan. [email protected]

Timothy Pflieger Emergency Management Specialist FEMA Region 6

6

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I




800 North Loop 288 Denton, TX, 76209 (940) 383-7325 [email protected]

Jessica Walker Environmental Scientist Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 602 North 5th Street Baton Rouge, LA, 70802 (225) 219-3825 j essica. [email protected]

William White Emergency Planner River Bend Station 5485 Hwy 61 St Francisville, LA, 70775 (225) 378-3731 [email protected]

7

_J

.Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)


1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the exercise:

State Jurisdictions Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals - Office of Public Health Louisiana State Police

Risk Jurisdictions East Baton Rouge Parish East Feliciana Parish Pointe Coupee Parish West Baton Rouge Parish West Feliciana Parish Baton Rouge Emergency Medical Services Baton Rouge Fire Department Baton Rouge Police Department East Baton Rouge Information Services East Baton Rouge Parish Council on Aging East Baton Rouge Department of Child and Family Services East Baton Rouge Parish Department of Public Works East Baton Rouge Parish Human Resources East Baton Rouge Parish Mayor's Office of Homeland Security ·and Emergency Preparedness East Baton Rouge Parish Public Information Office East Baton Rouge Parish Schools East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriffs Office East Baton Rouge Parish Maintenance Department Baker Fire Department Zachary Fire Department East Feliciana Parish Sheriffs Office East Feliciana Parish Police Jury President East Feliciana Parish School Board Jackson Police Department Jackson Mayor's Office Pointe Coupee Parish Office of Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness Pointe Coupee Parish Police Jury

8

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !I '

I

~--~ ----~--



Pointe Coupee Parish Sheriffs Office Pointe Coupee Parish Emergency Communications Pointe Coupee Parish Council on Aging Pointe Coupee Parish Health Depaiiment Pointe Coupee Parish Fire Department Pointe Coupee Parish Transpmiation Pointe Coupee Parish School Board West Baton Rouge Parish Council West Baton Rouge Parish Coroner's Office West Baton Rouge Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness West Baton Rouge Parish Parks and Recreation West Baton Rouge Parish Fire District #1 West Baton Rouge Parish Sheriffs Office Mayor of St. Francisville St. Francisville Police Department West Feliciana Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness West Feliciana Parish President West Feliciana Parish School Board West Feliciana Emergency Medical Services West Feliciana Parish Citizens' Corps West Feliciana Parish Department of Transportation West Feliciana Parish Chief Financial Officer

Private Organizations WJBO Radio Station River Bend Station Entergy Corporation Inc.

Federal Organizations US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Volunteer Organizations: Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service

9



SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design

The DHS/FEMA Region VI Office evaluated the exercise on June 27, 2018 to assess the capabilities of local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Procedures to protect the public health and safety during a plume emergency involving River Bend Station (RBS). The purpose of this report is to represent the results and findings on the performance of the off site response organizations during a simulated plume emergency.

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities

Exercise objectives and ·identified Capabilities/REP Criteria selected to be exercised are discussed in the Exercise Plan (EXPLAN), Appendix E.

2.3 Scenario Summary

The exercise scenario was developed to evaluate the response of exercise participants to an incident requiring evacuation of the public from the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone surrounding the River Bend Station (RBS). The exercise scenario provided for the evaluation of the State of Louisiana, East and West Baton Rouge, East and West Feliciana, and Pointe Coupee Parishes to make protective action decisions for the public and emergency workers.

10


I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I



SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES

3.1 Exercise Evaluation and Results

Contained in this section are the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the June 27, 2018 exercise to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of state .and local governments in the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone surrounding the River Bend Station.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated on the basis of its demonstration of criteria delineated in the exercise evaluation areas as outlined in the January 2016, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual. Detailed infonnation on the exercise evaluation area criteria and the extent of play agreement used in this exercise are found in Appendix E of this report.

3.2 Summary Results of Exercise Evaluation

The matrix presented on the following page presents the status of all exercise evaluation area criteria that were scheduled for demonstration during this exercise by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status is indicated by the use of the following letters:

M - Met (no Level 1 or Level 2 Findings assessed and no unresolved Findings from prior exercises)

1: Level 1 Finding assessed

2: Level 2 Finding assessed, or previous unresolved Level 2 Finding(s)

P: Plan issue

N: Not demonstrated

11

Unclassified I Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan I I

Table 3 .1 - Summary of Exercise Evaluation I DATE: 2018-06-27 u u I

SITE: River Bend Station 0 0 Ul u Ul u u i:: ,..<:1 0 ,..<:1 0 0 0 -~ er, u

M: Met, 1: Level I Finding, 2: Ul ·;:: Ul Ul Q.) .... e ca ,..<:1 ca ,..<:1 ,..<:1

Level 2 Finding, P: Plan Issue, N: p... er, p... er, er, u 0

Q.) ·;:: Q.) -~ ·;:: 0 :.a i:: Oil ca l::Jl ca Ul ca 0

Not Demonstrated ;j p... ;j p... p... ~ ~

'~ 0 Q.) ..... N ca o::! Q.) ....

i:: ~ i:: Q.) o::! µ.; E-< E-< U) ~ ca o::! §' .... ~ i:: :g i:: U) 0 ~ ~ Cl Ul

.8 0 :§ Ul .... 0 p... Ul µ.; µ.; ::r:: ca Q) o::! Q) u Ul 0 >-. CQ µ.; CQ µ.; Q.) U) Cl Cl Cl Cl CQ ....

Ul Ul Ul Ul u ca .... ...... ...... .... ~ ::r:: -. ,..<:1 er, er, er, er, Q Q Q Q >-< ~ ca ca Q.) Q.) ·o 0 -. u Ul Ul ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca

~ p... C) N

I I I

·~~¢rge~cy Oper'.1~i.9Rs-Manag,ement .· •. · · •;,

\, .,·. ·/. ..: .. , •"

; .. '·,, ' ' . " , .. . .'' .•, ' ' ., ' ·.· ,. ' . . .

Alert and Mobilization la! M M M M M M M M M

Facilities lb! M M M M I

Direction and Control lei M M M M M M M M

Communications Equipment !di M M M M M M M M M M M I Equipment and Supplies to Support Operations lei M M M M M M M M M M M M

I\otective Actiqn Decision Making ; '·.' ,,

' Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2al M M M M M M M

I Dose Assessment & P ARs & P ADs for the 2bl

M M Emergency Event Dose Assessment & P ARs & P ADs for the 2b2

M M M M M M Emergency Event

I P ADs for the Protection of persons with disabilities 2cl

M M M M M and access/functional needs Protective Action Implementation

., '

I Implementation of Emergency Worker Exp Control 3al M M M M M M M M M

Implementation of KI Decision for Institutionalized 3bl M M M M M

Individuals and the Public I

Implementation of Protective Actions for persons 3cl M M M M M

with disabilities and access/functional needs Implementation of Protective Actions for schools 3c2 M M M I Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3dl M M M M M

Implementation of Traffic and Access Control 3d2 M M M M M

field rvteasurement and Analysis I Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a2 M

Plume Phase Field Measurement and Analyses 4a3 M M I 12

I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

I After Action Report/Improvement Plan

I I DATE: 2018-06-27 u u

I SITE: River Bend Station 0 0

µ.:i u µ.:i u u ::: ..i:: 0 ..i:: 0 0 0 -~ "' 0

M: Met, 1: Level I Finding, 2: .... µ.:i ·;:: µ.:i µ.:i (!.)

ro ..i:: ro .:c: ..i:: e Level 2 Finding, P: Plan Issue, N: i:i... "' i:i... "' "' u 0

(!.) ·;:: (!.) ·;:: -~ 0 :a ::: bl) ro bl) ro µ.:i ro 0

Not Demonstrated ;::l i:i... ;::l i:i... i:i... ci::: ~ 0 ro 0 (!.) - N ci::: = ci::: ro (!.) ....

c:/l ~ = (!.) ro t:I... E-< E-< ro ro §< .... <r: = :g = :g c:/l 0 ~ ~ Cl µ.:i 0 0 µ.:i .... - 0 i:i... µ.:i t:I... t:I... :r: ro Q) ro Q) u µ.:i 0 ;>.,

CCI >Is CCI >Is (!.) c:/l Cl Cl Cl Cl CCI .... - .... - - :r: µ.:i µ.:i µ.:i µ.:i u ro .... ...., ..i:: "' "' "' "' = Q Q 9 Q ...... ~ ro ro (!.) (!.) ·s 0 ...., 0

µ.:i µ.:i ~ ~ ....:l ....:l ....:l ro i:i... c., N

I I

Emergency No~ification and Public Info .

Activation of the Prompt ANS Sal M M M M M p M

Activation of the Prompt ANS Sa3 M I

Subsequent Public Information Sb! M M M M M M M

Support Operations/Facilities ' +.· ,. ' ' ' ·,, ~ _,,, :, ...

'. ,' ' " I Reception Center Operations 6al

EW Monitoring & Decon 6bl M

Congregate Care 6cl I I I I I I I I I 13

I



3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries

3.3.1 State Jurisdictions

3.3.1.1 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality EOF

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: I.a.I, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.a.l, 2.b.l, 3.a.l, and 4.a.2.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None

c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None

d. PLAN ISSUES: None

e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None

f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3:1.9 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Field Monitoring Team .One

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, and 4.a.3.







3:3.1.13 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Field Monitoring Team Two

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

a. MET: l.d.l, l.e.l, 3.a.l, and 4.a.3.


14


I









3.3.1.17 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Headquarters


a. MET: l.a. l, l.c. l, l.d.l, and l.e. l.







3.3.1.21 Louisiana Emergency Operations Center


a. MET: l.a.l, l.c.l, l.d.l, l.e.l, 2.a.1, 2.b.l, 2.b.2, and 5.b.l.



d. PLAN ISSUES: ISSUE NO: 53-18-5al-P-01

LOCATION: Louisiana Emergency Operations Center

CRITERION: 5.a.l

CONDITION: Lack of coordination between GOHSEP and the Parishes for the time the EAS message would actually be broadcast resulted in the Parishes being unaware of the planned EAS sounding time and when the actual EAS message was released.

15



POSSIBLE CAUSE: The exact reason that the time the broadcast of the EAS message was not coordinated with the Parishes, is unknown. It may have been caused by ·a rush to complete the ANS sequence, a lack of training, or a lack of knowledge regarding the LPRRP Basic Plan.

With all the Parishes on the conference call, and with a coordinated time to sound the sirens already completed, communicating/coordinating the time for broadcast of the EAS message would have been the next logical step before ending the call. None of the Parishes inquired about, or confirmed, the EAS message time before the call concluded, nor did GOHSEP communicate the EAS message broadcast time before concluding the call ..

REFERENCE: NUREG-0654 E.5 and E.7 LPRRP: Basic Plan- Chapter 4, Paragraph ILE, which states: "An internet-based Emergency Alert System (EAS) program is operated by GOHSEP for River Bend Station. The system has the capability to send prerecorded and original messages to radio stations or commercial television stations as both voice and text. The system can call homes within a sp7cific area, send TTY and SMS messages and broadcast in other languages. Messages and broadcast times are coordinated with the Parish."

EFFECT: The Parishes assumed the EAS message was going to be broadcast at 1253, right after the 3 minute duration of the siren sounding, which commenced at 1250. Instead GOHSEP set the time for the broadcast of the EAS message to be 10 minutes from the start of the sirens sounding, at 1300. This resulted in the Parishes making false assumptions regarding the EAS broadcast time.

The unusually long 10 minute gap between the start of the sirens sounding and the broadcast of the EAS message may also have resulted in some residents in the affected areas to tune in too late or too early to their local EAS station for critical information, such as the evacuation being ordered.

RECOMMENDATION: Modify the appropriate plans/procedures to better define the entire ANS coordination process/sequence.

Add the coordination of the EAS broadcast time step to the existing EMERGENCY PLANNING INFORMATION AID that GOHSEP used during the exercise.

16


I I II ii

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I



Provide training as appropriate to ensure staff are familiar with all the steps/coordination involved in the ANS sequence.


f. PRIOR ISSUES RESOLVED: None


3.3.1.30 Joint Information Center


a. MET: l.a.l, l.d.l, Le.I, and 5.b.l





f. PRIOR ISSUES RESOLVED: None

g. PRIOR ISSUES UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions

3.3.2.1 East Baton Rouge Parish Emergency Operations Center


a. MET: l.a.l, l.b.l, l.c.l, l.d.1, l.e.1, 2.a.l, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.l, 3.d.l, 3.d.2, 5.a.l, 5.a.3, and 5.b.l.






17




3.3.2.4 East Feliciana Parish Emergency Operations Center

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is ·as follows:

a. MET: I.a.I, l.c.l, l.d.1, l.e.1, 2.a.l, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, and 5.b.l.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: ISSUE NO: 53-18-lel-L2-02

LOCATION: East Felidana Parish Emergency Operations Center

CRITERION: l.e.1

CONDITION: The Radiological Officer did not operationally check the Ludlum Model 3A Survey meter with the approved check source.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: Did not follow a procedure to conduct appropriate operational checks of the survey meter, including checking the response to an appropriate check source.

REFERENCE: NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, H.7, 10; I.7, 8, 9; J.10.a, b, e; J.11, 12; K.3.a; K.5.b)

EFFECT: The Radiological Officer may not have been able to detect contamination present on personnel or equipment.

CORRECTNE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Controller called a timeout and provided training to the Radiological Officer (RO). The RO correctly demonstrated appropriate operational and source checks on the survey meter.

d. ];>LAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: ISSUE NO: 53-16-lcl-L2-02

LOCATION: East Feliciana Parish Emergency Operations Center

CRITERION: l.c.l

18


I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I



CONDITION: Kl recommendation for Emergency Workers: 1246 fax was received by Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOSHEP) authorizing the administering of Potassium Iodide (KI) to all emergency workers.

At 1320, after-more inquiries for verification, the EOC Director called the GO SHEP to determine if KI had been authorized. During the call the EOC Director noticed fax that was sent at 1246. During brief from EOC Director it was discovered the fax did not list East Feliciana Parish (EFP) for KI authorization. The EOC Director determined since the fax did riot include the EFP and the time had been so long since the recommendation, that it didn't have cause for any further effort. The recommendation did include any emergency workers within a 5 mile radius of the utility. However, the emergency workers and public. were not impacted due to the scenario.

After inquiry from the evaluator the EOC Director called the GOSHEP again to verify that EFP should not be on the recommendation. At 1338, a fax was received from the GOSHEP with the KI recommendation for emergency workers including EFP. 1340 the EOC Director briefed that KI recommendation for ingestion be communicated to emergency workers.

Emergency Classification Levels: 0829 River Bend Station Short Notification Form was received that an Alert had been declared 0948 River Bend Station Short Notification Form was received that a

' Site Area Emergency had been declared. After the SAE notification, per procedures notifications were made and call down checklists were performed. Preplanning of PAR's were performed for schools and special needs. 1000 River Bend Station Notification Message Form was received that the Emergency Classification Level was at an Alert. The decision from the Parish President, EOC Director and Sheriff was that the declaration had been downgraded to and Alert. At that time the EOC staff conducted themselves as if the ECL was at an Alert and not at an SAE. At no time did the decision making entities ever verify the down-graded ECL. With no verification of the ECL from the EOC Director, the lead evaluator stopped play to communicate to the leadership group that they needed to verify what ECL they were making decisions in or it would impact the exercise play. At that time the EOC Director contacted the GOSHEP and it was verified the correct ECL was indeed an SAE. Decision process was started again to reflect the correct and current ECL.

19



POSSIBLE CAUSE: Lack of timely decision making or understanding of performing command and control tasks in accordance with procedures for verification of recommendations and emergency classification levels.

REFERENCE: NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, A.1.d; A.2.a, b; A.3; C.4, 6

EFFECT: Possible subjecting unwarranted dose to emergency workers while deployed to access control points. However, due to this scenario, this did not occur. No verification of Emergency Classification Levels (ECL) resulted in leadership making decisions while in the wrong ECL.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: Leadership displayed a dedicated use of procedures. All ECL and protective actions were verified, and actions timely during the 2018 River Bend Station exercise.


3.3.2.31 East Feliciana Parish School District


a. MET: 3.a.l and 3.c.2. b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2.33 Pointe Coupee Parish Emergency Operations Center


a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.l, 1.c.l, 1.d.l, 1.e.l, 2.a.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1, 3.a.1, 3.b.l, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.l, and 5.b.1.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None

20

I I I I I I I: 11 1! Ii I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

:1 I I



e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2.21 Point Coupee Parish School District


a. MET: 3.a.1 and 3.c.2. b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None

· g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2.22 West Baton Rouge Parish Emergency Operations Center


a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.1, 2.b.2, 2.c.1; 3.a.1, 3.b.1, 3.c.l, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1? and 5.b.1.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2.65 West Feliciana Parish Emergency Operations Center

a. MET: 1.a.1, 1.b.1, 1.c.1, 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 2.a.l, 2.b.2, 2.c.l, 3.a.l, 3.b.l, 3.c.1, 3.d.1, 3.d.2, 5.a.1, and 5.b.1.

b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None

21



e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.2.37 West Feliciana Parish School District


a. MET: 3 .a. l and 3 .c.2. b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.3 Support Jurisdictions

3.3.3.1 Zachary Fire Department Monitoring & Decontamination Center


a. MET: l.e.l, 3.a.l, and 6.b.l. b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: ~SSUE NO: 53-18-6bl-L2-03

LOCATION: Zachary Fire Department Emergency Worker Monitoring and Decontamination Center

CRITERION: 6.b.l

CONDITION: The Initial Personnel Monitor had to move his survey meter upscale during a personnel survey because the meter deflected off scale. Once he successfully took his measurement, he continued monitoring, but did not move the survey meter back to the lowest scale.

POSSIBLE CAUSE: The Initial Personnel Monitor did not follow procedures to move the meter back to the lowest scale before surveying for contamination.

22

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I



REFERENCE: NUREG 0654 K.5.a, b and REP Program Manual Part III, Evaluation Criterion 6.b.1

EFFECT: Failure to move the survey meter back to the lowest scale could have resulted in the Initial Personnel Monitor being unable to correctly detect and measure contamination during the remainder of the personnel survey.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DEMONSTRATED: The Controller at the Personnel Monitoring Station stopped play and provided training to the Initial Personnel Monitor. The Initial Personnel Monitor correctly re-demonstrated proper survey and monitoring technique.

d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES -RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

3.3.4 Private Jurisdictions

3.3.4.1 EAS Radio Station WJBO

In summary, the status ofDHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:.

a. MET: 5.a.l. b. LEVEL 1 FINDING: None c. LEVEL 2 FINDING: None d. PLAN ISSUES: None e. NOT DEMONSTRATED: None f. PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None g. PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None

23 ·



SECTION 4: CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the exercise, the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the State of Louisiana and the affected local jurisdiction are deemed adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate measures can be taken to protect the health and safety of the public in the event of a radiological emergency. Therefore, 44 CFR Part 350 approval of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and preparedness for the State of Louisiana site-specific to River Bend Station will remain in effect.

24

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I

11

I I I I


Unclassified Radio log ica l Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/ Improvement Plan

APPENDIX A: IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Issue Number: 53-18-Sal-P-01 Criterion: 5.a.1 ISSUE: Lack of coordination between GOHSEP and the Parishes for the time the EAS message would actually be broadcast.

RECOMMENDATION: Modify the appropriate plans/procedures to better define the entire ANS coordination process/sequence.

Add the coordination of the EAS broadcast time step to the existing EMERGENCY PLANNING INFORMATION AID that GOHSEP used during the exercise, just like the form currently has for the coordination of the siren sounding time.

Provide training as appropriate to ensure staff are familiar with all the steps/coordination involved in the ANS sequence.

CORRECTIVE ACTION DESCRIPTION: CAP ABILITY: PRIMARY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY:

Louisiana Governor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness

CAP ABILITY ELEMENT: START DATE: AGENCYPOC: ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:

25

Unclassified I Radiologica l Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Repo r t/ Improvement Pl an I I

APPENDIX B: EXERCISE TIMELINE I Location : Timel ine Date & Site : RBS 6/27/2018 I Emergency Classification Level or Event Time Declared Time That Notification Was Received or Action Was Taken

by Utility I State EOC LDEQHQ EOF JIC EBRP EOC WBRP EOC EFP EOC WFP EOC PCP EOC

Alert 0834 0849 0849 0857 0850 0850 0902 0849 0850 0849 I Site Area Emergency (SAE) 1106 1111 1111 1106 1112 1112 1112 1111 1111 1113

General Emergency (GE) 1212 1215 1212 1215 1217 1218 1215 1216 1215 I

Rad. Realase Started 1212 1210 1136 1215 0850 1218 0849 1216 1215

Rad. Release Terminated ongoing ongoing ongoing ongoing I

Facility Declared Operational 1002 0900 1033 0943 0916 1115 1046 0910 0945

Declaration of State of Emergency 1125 1125 1015 1129 1135 1140 1135

I Exercise Terminated

1410 1408 1415 1435 1408 1407 1408 1410 I Siren/

Early Precautionary Action Decisions: Notification

Type and Time:

Ill 0926 1005 1000 I

Protective Action Decisions (PADs) : Time of Siren

Activation : 1240 1240 1308 1240 1240 1240 1240 1240 I 111 Evacuation, Scenario 20

1250 1250 1250 1250 1250 1250 1250 1250

112 I EAS Messages and Times: EAS Message

Description : I 111 Msgll 1

1300

112 Msg # 2 I Kl Admin istration Decision

1310 1340 1331 1331 1400 1315 1404 I 26 I

I




APPENDIX C: EXERCISE EVALUATORS SITE: River Bend Station

LOCATION

• Governor's Office of Homeland i Security and Emergency Preparedness

l Louisiana Department of · •Enviromnental Quality Headquarters

' '

'.Louisiana Department of \Enviromnental Quality EOF

Louisiana Department of · Enviromnental Quality Field )Monitoring Team One

Louisiana .[)epartment of :Enviromnental Quality Field Monitoring Team Two.

;River Bend Joint Information Center

· East Baton Rouge Parish Emergency • Operations Center and Traffic/ Access Control Point

!East.Feliciana Parish Emergency · :operations Center and"Traffic/Access !Control Point

:Pointe Coupee Parish Emergency : Operations Center and Traffic/ Access Control Point

! ' "

DATE: 06/27/2018

I ' EVALUATOR

Andrew Chancellor

William McDougall Brian Ellis (OJT)

William McDougall Brian Ellis (OJT)

Nan Williams John Fill

Jeff Clark

Scott Flowerday

Lee Torres . Barbara Thomas

Alberto Sifuentes Lashawn Halsey Joe Suders

Greg Voss _Chris Nemcheck Taneeka Hollins

Darren Bates Miriam Weston Brad Dekorte

27

AGENCY

FEMAR7

FEMAR3 FEMAR6

FEMAR3 FEMAR6

FEMAR6 FEMAHQ

FEMAR7

FEMAR6

FEMAR3 FEMARl

FEMAR9 FEMAHQ FEMAR3

FEMAR7 FEMAR3 FEMA:Rl.

FEMAHQ. FEMAR2 FEMAR6 ·



: . ., .. ~, ..:·:. - ·:-- .:-:. ~'" , .. ,·--·,··-. ,--- -· ---·---··---------·<"· -··- - -

! W ~st 13atoh Rouge ·Parish Em~rien~y · Al6riio Mc$wain · · i Operations:Ceriter .and Traffic/ Access . . Gerald McLeri10re i Gontrol Point · · ' ' · · · .· .Elsa Lopez :: ._·::-.:_ -. " ·: :_-::-- ,,:..··. -··" ·- ·:-.:_·_:.... --- :.: -..--.:---_·--·~_:·-. --~ -~: ___ .,_--,.>-~~~: ... ::· _"··-

. !West Felidm1a,Parish Emergency . Marcy Campbell !'Opiratiopf Center· mid. Traffic/ Ac_cess ·. :, Lisa Rink '. ' ;control Pofot · · · · ·., Linpa Gee .. ! . ' ' - . -

., -·- - ~-~ . -" ...... . .. ···-- ......... ,.,.,.,

; . ·•·· .··:. · · · .. · · ' _ .. · .. ' · . · '. Timothy Pfli'eger iZac;hary Fire Dept, ElilergencyWorker. Nan Williams. '

1Moh/Decon Station,. .L:1iida Pee c t ··- - - . -------- ., -- -- -- - --------·-· .. ·--

!EAS Radio Sta~i~ri WJ~O ,I Tirilo~hy ffiieger·:· .· . ..~ -··---· ,.. . . ·- __ .,, . ,. .... , . ---- .. -·· . - --· . . - ., - - ' -- -

f PoiJt~·cdi~p~e P¥i;h Scho~l-Di~t1~t .'.~l!i~b~h;:Pflieg~;-r· :: ... ·.· " ..... -" -.... --. - -. . -·· ~-.. - : ,..._ - , -" -.... - . .. ,_ .... ;.. .. ..c. ...• ~- - -· ,,_ .

jwe~t·F~li6i~~aJ>~sh S_c~~~l-rii;tric:t·· :. r Tini~tl~;·Pfli~ger t . __ i_: - ::-:· ... ·_. . "" .. ,.. ' - -~·;.:.~.: <·. ~~. ::,: -~ . ::·,:-~ :::,-~· . -~ ·: '. ' -~:; ··.-~::. -~:.: .- . :· -~· -; -':·., '..: .. :::-~:-_::-;{.- >-- . ''East F:eliciana Parish S.chool District' Timothy Pflieger

28

.. FEMAHQ FEMAR.4 FE:tvrAR~ .·

·-··- ·- -- . -- . -- . ' -~ - ·- -- . -- ·-~·-- --. ··- ..

· ICF . FEMAHQ' .. FEMAR.6

·· .. FEiVIAR6 · ... · FEMAR6

.· , iiEKiA 'Ref

... ,, I_: ._.-:F:~~_AR:6.;· .. :·;, ... ·::i.:·,_--- ~~~~ .. ~~---- ,

.... , ·-· -·- - : - ' --~·,• ... - ·~·-· .

. i-·.' '--~~~~~~--,- .c .. ........ ""'

FEMAR.6

I I I I I I I I I I I 1: I I I I I I I




APPENDIX D: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym Meaning

ADA American's with Disabilities Act AJIC Alternate Joint Information Center CFR Code of Federal Regulations CPM Counts Per Minute cw Closed Window DAC Dose Assessment Coordinator DC Detention Center DBS Department of Homeland Security DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter EAS Emergency Alert System EBRP East Baton Rouge Parish ECL Emergency Classification Level EFP East Feliciana Parish EMD Emergency Management Director EMS Emergency Medical Services EOC Emergency Operations Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPD Electronic Personal Dosimeters EPZ Emergency Planning Zone EW Emergency Worker EXPLAN Exercise Plan FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMT Field Monitoring Team FTC Field Team Coordinator GE General Emergency GOHSEP G9vemor's Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness HOO Headquarters Operation Officer HQ Headquarters JIC Joint Information Center KI Potassium Iodide LA Louisiana

29

Acronym I LDEQ LDHH LOA LSU MHz MOU NRC OIC ORO OSL ow PAD PAG PAR PAS PCP PIO PPE PRD RACES RADEF RASCAL RBS RC REDAM REP RERP SAE SAV SB SEC SEL SEOC T/ACP TEDE



Meaning

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Letter of Agreement Louisiana State University Megahertz Memorandum of Understanding Nuclear Regulatory Commission Officer In Charge Offsite Response Organization Optically Stimulated Luminescent Open Window Protective Action Decision Protective Action Guideline Protective Action Recommendation Protective Action Sections Pointe Coupee Parish Public Information Officer Personal Protective Equipment Permanent Record Dosimeter Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service Radiological Defense Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis River Bend Station Reception Center Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Model Radiological Emergency Preparedness Radiological Emergency Response Plan Site Area Emergency Staff Assistance Visit School Board Secretary's Designee Senior EOF Liaison State Emergency Operations Center Traffic and Access Control Point Total Effective Dose Equivalent

30

I I I I I I I I I I 1·

I I I I I I I

I I


Acronym TLD VHF WBRP WFP



I Meaning Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Very High Frequency West Baton Rouge Parish West Feliciana Parish

31



APPENDIX E: EXERCISE PLAN

SCENARIO NARRATIVE

The scenario has been prepared to test the effectiveness of the emergency response organization (ERO) and functions of the RBS Emergency Plan, implementing procedures, facilities, and equipment. Some events that occur during this drill are unrealistic and may not be strictly in accordance with the design basis of the Facility.

Summary

At 0805 Receive report from the Fuel Building (DFS Project Manager) that the Spent Fuel Cask Crane has malfunctioned. The crane and its suspended load (loaded Hi-TRAC container) have stopped inside the Fuel Building.

At 0815 the Radwaste NEO performs actions to discharge Radwaste Recovery Sample Tank TK4A. A human error has occurred where the discharge permit is written for the wrong radwaste tank. Radwaste Tank B has been sampled, but Tank A is being discharged. After the discharge begins, RMS-RE-107 alarms with a reading> 1.27E-:01 µCi/ml. Equipment operators are unable to secure the leak within 15 minutes. The Emergency Director will declare an Alert on AAl-2, RMS-RE107effluent monitor has a VALID reading> 1.27E-01 µCi/mlfor > 15 minutes. Offsite notifications will be made and the ERO will be augmented using the ERO callout system. The Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) and Joint Information Center (JIC) become operational.

A catastrophic jet pump failure occurs causing reactor power to lower. Mechanical clad damage begins to occur due to jet pump parts entering the core. Off-gas system pre-treatment radiation levels will rise. The crew will recognize that fuel damage has occurred and determine that it is necessary to shutdown the unit. A manual reactor scram will be initiated however, all rods will not insert and reactor power will remain above 5%. High pressure feed will be available with condensate and feedwater. Both reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) and high pressure core spray"(HPCS) are available. Pressure control will be with safety relief valves (SR Vs) and main steam isolation valves (MSIVs). The Emergency Director will consult the EALs and at 1115 declare a Site Area Emergency based on SS3-1, an automatic'scram failed to shutdown the reactor AND Manual actions taken at the reactor control console do not shutdown the reactor as indicated by reactor power ~ 5%. Offsite notifications will be made and the protected area evacuated of nonessential personnel. A leak in the reactor water clean-up (RWCU) system will

32

I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I


Unclassified Radiologica l Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

A rter Ac tio n Report/Improvement Plan

occur in the main steam tunnel resulting rising steam tunnel temperature and main plant exhaust radiation levels.

The running control rod drive (CRD) pump will trip offline. The second CRD pump will be started to allow operators to manually insert control rods . The leak in RWCU will propagate resulting in a release through the turbine building and main plant exhaust. Radiation levels increase in the turbine building. Reactor water level will slowly lower, but will still be above the top of active fuel (-162").

At approximately 1235, the Emergency Director will consult the EALs and declare a General Emergency based on AG 1-2, Dose assessment using actual meteorology indicates doses > I OOOmR TEDE or 5000 mR thyroid CDE at or beyond the site boundary.

· Note: If the operations crew cannot maintain RPV pressure and Suppression Pool temperature in the Heat Capacity Temperature Limit (HCTL) Safe Zone, then the General Emergency will be declared on SG3-1 . The classification and protective action recommendation will be communicated to offsite agencies. The release will be a monitored release.

Main plant exhaust rate will reach its highest level at approximately 1250. The TSC and OSC teams will successfully isolate the RWCU leak resulting in a decline in radiological release rate. Radiological release rates will fall to near background levels around 1330. At approximately 1400, the simulator will be placed in FREEZE and the players will begin a self-critique.

33

Unclassified Radiologica l Emergency Preparedness Program (REP )

Arter Action Report/Improvement Plan

Exercise Timeline

Note: all times are approximate ("-" = approximately)

-0800

-0815

-0830

-1000

-1050

-1050

-1110

-1135

-1145

-1230

-1235

-1255

-1310

-1400

Exercise begins

Main Control Room receives indication that release exceeds 1.27E1 uCi/ml

Alert declared ; based on AA 1-2 (valid reading > 1.27E-01 µCi/ml for ~ 15 mins) .

JIC becomes operational

A jet pump catastrophically fails

Attempt to shutdown reactor automatically and manually is unsuccessful.

Site Area Emergency declared; based on SS3-1 (an automatic scram failed to shutdown the reactor and manual actions taken at the reactor control console do not shutdown the reactor as indicated by reactor power~ 5 %) .

A line break in the main steam tunnel will propagate.

Reactor shutdown

Offsite dose projections greater than 1000 mR

General Emergency declared ; based on AG1-2 (dose assessment using actual meteorology indicates doses > 1000 mR TEDE or 50000 mR thyroid COE at or beyond the site boundary).

PAR verification call made, siren sounding time set, and parish actions demonstrated

The RWCU leak is secured , release stops

Drill terminated

34


I Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

I After Action Report/Improvement Plan

I I I I I I I I I I

This page is intentionally blank.

I I I I I I 35

I

Documents

Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program I ~ -FEMA I · Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 27,