Upload
duongdung
View
225
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gremikha Project. Status, problems & proposals
Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
B.S. Stepennov, RRC KI
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Gremikha Project participants:Rosatom, RRC «Kurchatov Institute»,
SevRAO,
VNIPIET,
NIKIET,
IPPE,
HYDROPRESS
Additional funding and technical support:CEA (France),
EBRD,
EC (TACIS)
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Radioactive waste management objective
— implementation of a system of environmentally safe management of waste
of different activity levels and types accumulated and arising in the course
of remediation activities with the maximum possible limitation of an adverse impact
of ionizing radiation from the radioactive waste on workers, public and environment.
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Specific features of the TSF in Gremikha
Remoteness and isolation from large
industrial centres.
Lack of a developed transportation
system.
Lack of a RW management
infrastructure.
Various kinds of RW that differ in
storage locations, radiation parameters,
physicochemical composition, sizes, etc.
High staff turnover (by categories and qualifications).
�.
2.
3.
4.
�.
Arkhangelsk
Murmansk
Arkhangelsk
Murmansk
Gremikha TSFGremikha TSF
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Criteria used for selection of organizational and technical solutions on RW management
Technologies and processes to be used shall be simple, proven and efficient and along
with this shall ensure nuclear and radiation safety.
Minimum new construction construction of permanent buildings and structures.
Minimum number of steps in the RW management process along with meeting
acceptance criteria and requirements of transportation to the Regional Centre
in Saida Bay.
Unification and minimization of a range of containers used in transportation and handling
schemes.
�.
2.
3.
4.
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of RW management at the TSF in Gremikha
Radioactive waste
LRW
High-level(HLW)
Treated LRW
SRW
ILWLLW
Filtration
Evaporation
Grouting
SRW sorting and fragmentingContainers with SRW
Low- andintermediate-level
(LLW, ILW)
Very low-levelSRW
(VLLW)
Grouting andconditioning
Compactionof soft SRW
Packing incontainers
Preparation of shipping packagesPreparation of shipping packages
High-level processingof SRW and preparationof packages for storage
Disposalin a near-surface
repository
Long-term storage Regional Centrein Saida Bay
Transportat ion
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
General layout of the TSF
Open Pad
SNF & SRW managementdepartment
LRW managementdepartment
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Arrangement of equipment in working areas at the Open Pad.
Stage 2. Removal of SRW
Filtering system
Special solutionspreparation unit
Water-supply system
SRW extraction operator’s module
Scanning unit module
Vehicle washer
Special vehicle (MoAZ-7503)
Special vehicle loading area
Truck-mounted 100-t craneLiebher LTM 1100-4.1
Vent stack (existing)
Air plasma cutting module
Container decontamination module
Container draining module
Personnel contaminationcontrol station (RCP)
Working area for completing SRWand SNF containers
100-t crane working area
10-t crane boom turning radius 22000 mm
20-t crane boom turning radius 13000 mm
Exhaust ventilation module
Containment under the modulefor extraction of SRW from containers
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of SRW management at the TSF in Gremikha
Metal SRW(ILW, HLW)
Work clothesand PPE
Filters, CPS
Cemented LRW
Containers with SRW
Very low level waste(rubbish, soil, etc.)
On-site disposalin a near-surface repository
Removal
Empty containers
Drying. Sorting.Fragmentation.Compaction.
Highly penetratingcompound castingof HLW and ILW
Packing.Sealing.
Certification
Building 505Building 504
Building 503
Interimstorage
Area 502
Total accumulated amount 1500 m3
HLW – 7.5 m3
ILW – 195 m3
LLW – 1290 m3
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual layout of SRW management areas
Хранение пустыхконтейнеров
Storageof reagents
Building 9
Cement mixpreparation
Building 505
Completingof containers
Building 10
Interim storageof containers
Area 502Demolition of building 11
SRW sorting
Building 504
HLW ILW LLW
�mptycontainers
Building 503
SRW from the Open Pad
New construction
Exiasting building (refurbishment)
Open area
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Layout solutions. Buildings 504 & 505. Structures 501, 502 & 503
Building 11
Building 10Building 9
Bui
ldin
g 50
4 Stru
ctur
e 50
2
Structure 503
Stru
ctur
e 50
1
Bui
ldin
g 50
5
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Options of LRW management at the TSF in Gremikha
Accumulated LRW:
• in shore tanks at the LRW site;
• in the pipe lane in building ��;in the pipe lane in building ��;
• in building �;in building �;
• in buried tanks in building ��;in buried tanks in building ��;
• in floating tanks ������;in floating tanks ������;
• in type �� and �� containers with S��� and containersin type �� and �� containers with S��� and containers with SRW at the Open �ad.
Total:
LLW 24� m3
ILW ��� m3
HLW �.2 m3
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of LRW management for two options
Removalof LRWCement grouting
Salt concentrateRemoval and storage�vaporation
Селективнаяочистка
C o n t r o l
Decantate LLWCementedRW
Sediment
Condensate LLWCondensate
Purified LRW
Dischargeor recycling
Decantate ILW
Removal ofcemented LRW
Interimstorage
Settling and compactionof the sediment
Mixing
LRW (option �)
LRW (option 2)
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Layout of buildings and shelters for LRW treatment equipment
1 1
521
522
Building 19
Building 17
Single-beam electricbridge crane Q=5t
506
– V
ehic
leac
cess
yar
d
New annex to building 17Newly constructed shelter
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of management of SRW stored in building 19
LLW: packing intocontainers KS-5
ILW: packing intocontainers KSZ-5
Removal
Handling andconditioningin buildings504 & 505
Preparationof shippingpackages
SRW in building 19(except HLW)
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of SRW management in open areas
SRW in openareas
Initial sorting Radiation control Removal of LRW
Removal
Preparationof packages
Handlingand conditioning
in buildings504 & 505
Packinginto reusable
containersor applicationof a protectiveaccumulating
coating
Area near building 1 Area betweenthe dry dock and building 1B
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Conceptual flow chart of management of SRW from dismantling of floating tanks
LLW: packinginto standard
containers
ILW: packinginto containers
for transportationof drumswith ILW
Handlingand conditioning
in buildings504 & 505
Conditioningin building
505
Removal
Preparationof packages
Floating tanks
Fra
gm
ents
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Operations with SRW at the Open Pad
С уз4
Жбе1
Бет8Бет7
С уз1
С уз3
С уз2
БК1
БК2
МК1
МК2
Бет5
Бет2
Бет1
Бет4Жбе2Бет3
Жбе3Бет6
Л30
Л31
53
1 2 3 4
5678
9 10 11 12
13141516
1718 19 20
2122
2324252627
28 29 30
33
34
3536
37
383940
41
4243 44 45 46 47
484950
51
52Бак
Л27
Л23 Л24
Л25
Л26
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
64
65
66 68
69
71
7374
75
7677
78
79
8082
83
84
85
88
89
90
91 92
93
94
95
96
98
99
100
101
103 104
105102
106
107
108109
110
111112 113 114
115
116
81
31
32
97
6067 86
70
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ ОБ ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
О БО Б
ОБ ОБ
К7
К1К2
К3
К1 0
К8
К9
К5
К6
К4
Б5
Б2Б1
Б6
К11 Бет9
К1 6К1 5К1 4
К1 3
С из2
С из1
Б3 Б4
Л29Л28
П1
П2
Ф
Ф
Ф
Х2
Х1
Х5Х4
Х3
Х6
Л19
Л17
Л3
Л20
Л13
Л8
Л14
Л18
Л16
Л2
Л5
72
6387
SE
NW
SWNE
- localization stage 1(2006): containers K10, K15, No.109, 113 & 114 (type 11), SFA fragment between type 6 containers No.2 and No.3;
- localization stage 2 (2007): container K15 (once more), containers No.35 (type 6), No.110, 111, 115 & 116 (type 11), SFA fragment near container Жбе2, traps;
- localization stage 3 (proposals for 2008): container No.113 (once more), SFA fragment near container Жбе2 (once more), containers Бет2, Бет4 & Бет8.
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Improvement of the radiation situation at the Open Pad
А
B
C
Equivalent dose rate at 3 m above the Open Pad:
А �� before localization of sources,�� before localization of sources, before localization of sources, spring 2����, �� = 3,2� µSv/h
B �� after stage � of localization of sources, autumn 2����, �2 = �,�� µSv/hµSv/h
C �� after stage 2 of localization of sources,�� after stage 2 of localization of sources, after stage 2 of localization of sources, autumn 2���, �2 = �,34 µSv/hµSv/h
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Legend:
С уз4
Жбе1
Бет8Бет7
С уз1
С уз3
С уз2
БК1
БК2
МК1
МК2
Бет5
Бет2
Бет1
Бет4Жбе2Бет3
Жбе3Бет6
Л30
Л31
53
1 2 3 4
5678
9 10 12
13141516
1718 19 20
2122
2324252627
28 29 30
33
34
3536
32
383940
41
4243 44 45 46 47
484950
51
52Бак
Л27
Л23 Л24
Л25
Л26
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
64
65
66 68
69
71
7374
75
7677
78
79
8082
83
84
85
88
89
90
91 92
93
94
95
96
98
99
100
101
103 104
105102
106
107
108109
110
111112 113 114
115
116
81
31
37
97
6067 86
70
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ ОБ ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
ОБ
О БО Б
ОБ ОБ
К7
К1К2
К3
К1 0
К8
К9
К5
К6
К4
Б5
Б2Б1
Б6
К11 Бет9
К1 6К1 5К1 4
К1 3
С из2
С из1
Б3 Б4
Л29Л28
П1
П2
Ф
Ф
Ф
Х2
Х1
Х5Х4
Х3
Х6
Л19
Л17
Л3
Л20
Л13
Л8
Л14
Л18
Л16
Л2
Л5 TK-6, contain only intact SFA (42);
TK-6, contain only intact SFA, contain water (34);
TK-6, contain intact and damaged SFA (22);
TK-6, contain SFA without a basket, contain water (2);
TK-6, contain intact and damaged SFA, contain water (5);
TK-6 without SFA – empty or containing other components (2);
TK-11 (9).
72
6387
11
Examination of SFA in TK-6 containers
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Information on SFA in type 6 TK containers at the Open Pad
Distribution of the number of TK-6 containers by water radioactivity level
Examination of SFA in TK-6 containers
98 ТК
39 – 610 115725 84% 16%
686SFA
Co
mp
lete
se
t o
f S
FA
6 ТК
Sh
ort
age
of
SF
A
3 ТК
TK
wit
ho
ut
SF
A
74 ТК
com
ple
te s
et
of
inta
ct S
FA
on
ly
30 ТК
TK
co
nta
in in
tact
an
d d
amag
ed
SF
A
2007
2
103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Num
ber
of c
onta
iner
s
Water activityin the TK, Bq/l
Sr-90Cs-137
16
4
12
15
6
12
3 3
2007
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Removal of intact SFA according to a regular procedure
Ramp(concrete)
Concretewall
Open Pad area Area nearthe Open Pad
Caskof type ��
Rock
Vehicle MAZ �������3�
Road to SD���
Rock
Station for preparation of a type �� cask for transportation
Road movementarea
Area of SFA loadingon the ship
SFAreloading area
Reloading container
Building 1
Basket 22M
Maintenance shipspent fuel storage
Cask of type ��
Cask dryingsection
�ointingdevice
Gremikha Project. Radioactive waste management. Organizational and technical solutions
Oxford, UK, 5-7 March 2008
Summary1. The works on RW management are performed with financial and
technical support from donor countries, first of all C�A (��rance), �BRD, �C (TACIS) and Rosatom.
2. The issue of the day is selection of an optimum SRW and LRW management option in view of effective technologies using unified container types, process equipment and means of delivery.
3. A key aspect of RW management is coordination of works between facilities under remediation and the Saida Centre to ensure that criteria of waste acceptance for processing and storage are met.
4. Solution of the RW management problem may be expedited if experience available in western companies is used.