Upload
kenton
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Radio Astronomy in Mexico. Background Two major projects SKA?. Luis F. Rodríguez Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM. Who/Where we are…. ~130 astronomers at ~7 research centers ~14 radio astronomers at ~4 research centers. ~2 PhD students per year in radio astronomy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Radio Astronomy in Mexico
• Background
• Two major projects
• SKA?
Luis F. Rodríguez
Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM
Who/Where we are…
• ~130 astronomers at ~7 research centers• ~14 radio astronomers at ~4 research centers
UNAM INAOE and others
Stan Kurtz
Yolanda Gomez
David Hughes
William Wall
Laurent Loinard Eugeni Lekth
Luis F. Rodríguez Eduardo Mendoza
Salvador Curiel Victor Migenes
Jose Antonio Garcia-Barreto
Luis Zapata
Miguel Angel Trinidad
Carlos Rodríguez-Rico
• ~2 PhD students per year in radio astronomy
Two Major Projects
LMT - The Large Millimeter Telescope Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Optica y Electrónica
EVLA - Expanded Very Large Array + ALMA – Atacama Large Millimeter Array Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM
EVLA and ALMA
• 2 million US$ “mega” project • CONACyT funding, L.F. Rodríguez the P.I.• Despite extensive efforts, no Mexican
contractors found; funding won by NRAO• Assures competitive Mexican access to ALMA
The Large Millimeter Telescope
Largest Mexican science/technology project ever attemptedINAOE-UMASS collaboration~ 80 million US$ spent ~ 20 million US$ still needed
Large Millimeter Telescope
Testing to start in 2007
Many challenges still in the future
Implications for SKA participation
• Mexico has a small but active (and growing) radio community with a definite interest in SKA.
• Short term prospects for formal participation are complex (rest of science community wants to
see results from ELVA+ALMA and from LMT).
• Medium and long term prospects are good, most possibly through a one-time financial contribution.
Previous Experience Indicates That…
• It is highly desirable that funding is spent within Mexico.
• Technical innovation and development as a Mexican contribution is quite challenging. A lot
of work and organization are needed. Infrastructure is relatively strong.
• One-time financial contributions are more viable than long-term commitments.