55
Analysis & Diagnosis 1 Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

  • Upload
    emera

  • View
    53

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models. Supercells. Well developed Supercell with Rear Anvil. MAMMATUS CLOUDS (in the overhanging anvil). MAMMATUS. HEAVY RAIN. RAIN. HAIL. SHORT FLANKING TOWERS (no rain). RAIN FREE BASE. OVERSHOOTING TOPS. Banding. Wall Cloud. Tail Cloud. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 1Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Page 2: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 2Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercells

Page 3: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 3Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Page 4: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Well developed Supercell with Rear Anvil

Page 5: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

MAMMATUS CLOUDS (in the overhanging anvil)

Page 6: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

RAINRAIN

HEAVYHEAVY RAINRAIN

HAILHAIL

RAIN FREE BASERAIN FREE BASE

SHORT FLANKING TOWERS (no rain)

OVERSHOOTING OVERSHOOTING TOPSTOPS

MAMMATUSMAMMATUS

Page 7: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Banding

Page 8: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Wall Cloud

Tail Cloud

Page 9: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Page 10: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Identification

• Cloud Features

Page 11: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

LP Supercell

• Less common supercell

Page 12: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

HP Supercell

• More common supercell

Page 13: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Modeling - Satellite Features - Low Level Flow Boundaries• Outflow boundary interaction...

Page 14: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Modeling - Satellite FeaturesMid Level Flows relating to Low Level Flows• V- notch and other flows...

Page 15: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Storm Propagation

• Regeneration• Propagation• Train-echo systems

Page 16: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Splitting - One

• Storm splitting in straight line shear

Page 17: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Splitting - Two

• Low level baroclinicity increases mid level meso

Page 18: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Splitting - Three

• Veering hodo favours the right mover...

Page 19: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Splitting - Four

• straight line shear• cyclonic shear with height

Page 20: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Structure

• Potential satellite and radar clues to a supercell

Page 21: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 21Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Supercell Prediction

Page 22: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 22Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Instability

• Thermodynamic parameters• The most important include: • CAPE• LI• Cap• Dewpoint depression 700 through 500 mb

Page 23: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 23Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Moisture - Dewpoints

• Greater than 24C (75F) Incredibly juicy• 18-23C (65-74F) Juicy• 12-17C (55-64F) Semi-juicy• Less than 11C (55F) Low moisture content

Page 24: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 24Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Conceptual Model for Supercell Tornadogenesis

Page 25: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 25Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Shear

• Positive shear in the 0 to 3km above ground level. Units are in time to the negative 1.

• 0 to 3 weak • 4 to 5 moderate • 6 to 8 large • 9+ very large

Page 26: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 26Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Speed Shear

• Causes updrafts to tilt in the vertical thus leading to supercell storms.

• Speed shear also causes tubes of horizontal vorticity, which can be ingested into thunderstorms.

Page 27: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 27Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Cell Splitting

Page 28: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 28Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

0-3km VWS

• Directional Shear• Cause horizontal vorticity • Also produces differential advection• Best case… SE at sfc… SW at 700 mb

Page 29: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 29Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Right Propagating Supercells

Page 30: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 30Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Tornadogenesis and the RFD

Page 31: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 31Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Storm-Relative 500 mb Winds

• 500 mb level) storm-relative (S-R) winds useful to help differentiate between tornadic and non-tornadic supercells within the overall environment

• Balance between Low-Level Inflow and• Low-level Rear Flank Downdraft

Page 32: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 32Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Storm-Relative 500 mb Winds

• 500 mb S-R winds = 16 kts (8 m/s) Lower limit for tornadic supercells.

• 500 mb S-R winds = 40 kts (20 m/s)

Aprx upper limit for tornadic supercells.

Page 33: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 33Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Vorticity Generation

• Advection + Tilting + Stretching• Stretching term is the ONLY term capable of

amplifying vorticity to tornadic magnitudes

Page 34: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 34Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

500 millibar vorticity

• Vorticity is a function of curvature, earth vorticity, and speed gradients.

• If the values of vorticity are being rapidly advected, divergence will "in the real world" be much more than if the winds through the vorticity maximum are stationary or moving slowly.

Page 35: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 35Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Low Level Jet - LLJ

• Strong low level winds will quickly advect warm and moist air into a region if it is associated with the low level jet

• Low level convergence along LLJ

Page 36: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 36Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Upper level Jet Stream

• Greater 200 knots Incredible divergence• 150 to 200 knots Large divergence• 100 to 149 knots Good divergence• 70 to 99 knots Marginal divergence• Less 70 knots Small divergence

Page 37: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 37Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Lake Breeze Boundaries – Guelph Tornado

Page 38: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 38Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Maximum Updraft Speed

• W-max = square root of [2(CAPE)]• CAPE of 1500-2500 J/kg gives a w-max range of

about 50-70 m/s (100-140 kts).• due to water loading, mixing, entrainment, and

evaporative cooling, the actual w-max is approximately one-half that calculated

Page 39: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 39Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

CAPE Distribution

• A longer, narrower profile represents the potential for a slower updraft acceleration but taller thunderstorms which is best for high precipitation efficiency

• A shorter, fatter profile would lead to a more rapid vertical acceleration which would be important for potential development of updraft rotation within the storm.

Page 40: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 40Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Convective Inhibition - CINH

• negative area on a sounding. A large cap or a dry planetary boundary layer will lead to high values of CINH and stability

Page 41: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 41Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

CAP

• Cap strength in degrees Celsius• Cap needs to be less than 2 in general before it

can be broken

Page 42: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 42Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Mesocyclone and the Updraft

Page 43: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 43Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

RFD

• If RFD is too cold and strong then the updraft may be undercut before tornadogenesis can begin

• If the RFD is relatively warm, the tornadoes can be long lived and violent.

Page 44: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 44Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Precipitation Drag RFD’s

• In moist thermodynamic profiles, evaporative cooling potential minimal even if heavy PCPN is close to the updraft… precipitation drag may drive the RFD.

Page 45: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 45Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Cyclic Mesocyclones

Page 46: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 46Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Tornado Events

• Likely isolated supercells but can develop within line segments

• High Ambient SRH (0-2km>200 m2s2) except when high CAPE and deviant storm motion locally creates helicity

• Mid-upper level winds (4-6km >15kts) aid tornado development and longevity

• CAPE/CAPE Distribution/LFC/LCL and Evaporative cooling (RFD)

• Boundaries – local helicity and possibly lower LCL

Page 47: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 47Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Discrete Supercells

• Convergence more localized than linear• If CIN/CAP weak, convergence trigger can be very

subtle• Strong CIN/CAP (50 J/kg) under strong convergence• Shear is through a deep layer (0-6km)• Mean Shear Vector oriented at a relatively large angle to

the initiating boundary• Discrete Supercells can evolve into lines but rarely from

lines to discrete

Page 48: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 48Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

LFC/LCL Heights

• For greater tornado threat, relatively low LCL heights (<6000 ft)

• High LCL heights associated with dry boundary layers promote– Convective downbursts– Outflow dominated convection

Page 49: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 49Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Horizontal Convective Rolls

• Align with the mean wind• Forced by surface heating• Identified by cloud streets• Contribute to convection initiation

Page 50: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 50Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Horizontal Roll Conceptual Model

Page 51: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 51Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Page 52: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 52Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Upper Patterns

• SWLY upper flow ahead of sharp upper trof• WSWLY upper flow associated with low

amplitude S/W trofs embedded with a progressive WLY flow pattern

Page 53: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 53Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Torndogenesis Failure

• LFC too high• PBL too dry• Storms evolve into lines too quickly• Too little CAPE above the LFC• Too little helicity in the absence of boundaries• Deep Layer shear too strong for the CAPE• Mid Level storm relative shear too weak

Page 54: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 54Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Nowcasting Tornado Potential

• Monitor vertical shear (VWP data)• Jet Streaks• Surface Pressure Tendencies• Surface Analysis Boundaries• Satellite – Breaks in clouds along line• Deviant Storm Motion – Right Movers• Rapid Destabilization/ Pressure Falls

Page 55: Radar – Supercell Convection Conceptual Models

Analysis & Diagnosis 55Radar Palette Home Supercell Convection

Improving Warnings for Areas with No Radar

• Weather Watcher Coverage• Anticipation based on Diagnosis• Upstream Warnings/Prior Events• Satellite/Surface Observations

– Enhanced-V notch– Boundaries– Destabilization