Rachel Weeping Her Children Part 1

7/30/2019 Rachel Weeping Her Children Part 1

1/36

R A C H E L W E E P I N G H E R C H I L D R E N M I C H A E L B O L E R J A C K

























2/36

Rachel Weeping Her Children, Part 1 2012 Michael Bolerjack


3/36

Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet,saying, In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and

weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.

Matthew 2: 17-18


4/36


5/36

Sept 18 publish 2 power

Power of attorney Practice (what you preach)Practical theology

Praemunire An offense against the English crown punishable

chiefly by forfeiture and originally committed by asserting papal legal supremacy in England.

A fortiori if it applies to the English King, how much more so to the King of Glory

(see Solemnity of Christ the King)

2 Defenses 1 The Butler2 The Nuns

Butler claims call by the Holy Spirit. Acts onbehalf of God. Sees evil everywhere in theChurch.


6/36

Popes papers not his private property. Prope rty of the Church. Pope does not own the Church,

God does. What did John Paul II own at the time of hisdeath? At best, Benedict only has the use of things, not ownership.Claim of psychiatrist that the Butler is suffering a grave psychological disorder is a

misinterpretation of a true symptom. The Butlerssymptoms of restlessness, uneasiness, etc. point toa guilty conscience, having been side by side withthe Pope for several years and seeing many thingsthat he felt compelled to reveal at his own risk.

The check found in his apartment is clearly aplant by the Vatican to smear him. He did notleak the papers for money, therefore he would notsteal the check.

Praemunire. Offense against the crown. Basic

offense of the papacy is the existence of thepapacy.

The Nuns. Offense against the U.S. constitutionby Rome. The nuns have first amendment rights.


7/36

As Americans. Human rights under U.N.Everyone must obey conscience, conscience

cannot be forced, especially in religious matters(Vatican Council II).

The power-play by the Vatican is a chapter in theon-going fight between democratic and anti-democratic forces in the world today.

Pragmatic Sanction A solemn decree of a sovereign on a matter of primary importance and with the force of fundamental law.

Sovereignties in question.

Who is sovereign? What is sovereignty?

The dependence of sovereignty on hierarchy. The notion of hierarchy in Dionysius. Medievalecclesiology.

Restructuring/Openness.


8/36

Open the windows John XXIII.

Mt 8, Mt 13.Centerpiece, thematic focus.Mt 13 justifies its inclusion in scripture, despite alie.Christ did not intend to leave the weeds.He said, take out the beam from your own eye.

Not leave it in.Pull the ox out of the ditch, despite the Sabbath.Do not leave it in.

Cleansing of the temple. Dont leave em tilljudgment day. Do it now.


9/36

By analogy

They loseanalogy

Pub 2. Sept 18.

The Butler

The Nuns

Praemunire: The ButlerPraemunire: The Nuns


10/36

In my work on the catholic apocalypse I arrived atmy premises and arguments and conclusionsusing only faith and reason. All of the information

I deduced the work from is a matter of publicrecord, more or less. Nothing has been based onany private, special, divine revelation of the Lordgiven to me. I prayed often and thought thingsover, for myself. At the end I made a specialprayer to the Blessed Virgin Mary and over thenext few minutes I arrived at what I think Benedicts endgame will be. It is not a prophecy in the sense of a Biblical prophecy, but a thinking in reflection that is based on prayer.


11/36

End of Prophecy.

There have been 17 encyclicals of the Antichrist.Because of the exigency of the number 18(6+6+6=18, 6x6x6=216=2+16=18, John Paul 2+Benedict 16=18) there must be 18 before thepontificate of Benedict ends. He said previously

he had delayed his next encyclical in order topublish the second half of his best-selling book on Jesus. Now that this is out of the way, as wellas his book on the signs of the times, he willsoon publish his fourth encyclical , to go with

John Paul IIs 14 circular letters, to reach thefateful number. What could Benedictsculminating statement be? I think it will be adogmatic ex cathedra assertion of the proposedMarian doctrine of her as mediatrix and adjutrix.

The promulgation of a dogma, long in the works,

announcing the Blessed Virgin Mary to be, withChrist, co-mediator and co-adjutor (judge), will doseveral things at once. In terms of the possibility of ecumenism of Catholic and other Christianchurches, (the reconciliation of Catholic and other


12/36

Christian churches), this will be foreclosed asimpossible. Already the Vatican has floated the

idea (in 2011) that the pope after Benedict is thereal A ntichrist, and that he will be anecumenist. The reading of 19 th century Russiantheologian Solovyev Tales of the Antichrist

were recommended as reference. The propheciesof Malachy are well-known. There is only one

pope after Benedict, according to him. As a friendtold me when I first made my discovery about thenumber 666 in 2010, its either the one now or thenext one. I think that I have shown it is at leastthe one now, and not only him, but the onebefore him, as well. Of the one to come, I know not. What will the encyclical on Mary do besidesax ecumenism, the great cause of Vatican CouncilII? It will do something that I think isunprecedented. The dogmas in 1854 and 1950 of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption

of Mary, respectively, did not contradict scripture.Scripture did not comment on them, so the popeshad a free hand. The matter of Mary being co-mediator and co-adjutor is different. The apostlePaul said we have one sole mediator with God,


13/36

Jesus Christ. Christ Himself said scri pture cannotbe broken. A papal ex cathedra (infallible)

assertion of such a Marian dogma wouldcontradict the scriptures, and break them, denying not only Paul, but the Lord as well. It is to beexpected of the Antichrist to do such a thing, andI believe he will, having already set-up theabomination of desolation in the beatification of

John Paul II and suspended the sacrifice in the wording of the mass, and perhaps something elseto come regarding the mass.

[For a revision of this in light of my later opinionas regards the desolation and suspension, see theend of the work to come regarding what took place at Easter 2010 at the Vatican.]

The odd thing about the End of the Church Age, the notorious prediction for May 2011, the

prophecy the world would end by being destroyedby earthquakes time zone by time zone is that it was true, or will be, but only spiritually notliterally. At some point, I do not know if it hashappened yet, time zone by time zone, starting


14/36

with the new day in the Western Pacific, all theCatholic Churches in the world will pronounce

something in the order of mass, perhaps not the well-known changes widely discussed before they went into effect in November 2011, but perhapsfrom the unprecedented masses of reconciliation placed at the back of the new order. The Church will fall time zone by time

zone on that day, if it has not already done so. These masses of reconciliation, as stipulated inthe paragraph heading them, can be said for anumber of reasons, one being a time of emergency, but there are many other morepedestrian reasons. These masses are the literalimage of the beast spoken for worship, which Ibelieve is the correct interpretation of Revelation,a kind of statute, not statue, that doesnt speak,but is spoken. In any case, the apocalypse long awaited is now nearly over. Benedicts reign will

end in 2014, fulfilling the 36 years of theantichristian papacy, because of the exigency of the number 36 (1+2+3 and so on +36=666).

After that what the last pope will do and who he will be, God alone knows.


15/36

However, to be more precise, I will add that I

believe the actual [ritual] deconsecration of theCatholic Church will take place through theinsertion into the recently issued new order of mass of keywords concerning the new dogma that

will be infallibly declared and made binding on allthe Catholic faithful. Something about the

mediatrix and adjutrix. The new order of massitself lamented publically by an Italian bishop asthe complete revocation of all the thousands of persons involved with Vatican Council II had

worked so long and so hard for, is actually just theframework or pretext for the words the pope willhave placed in it concerning the essentialdogmatic assertion by the Antichrist that will[further] isolate Catholics, seem to impair the truesovereignty of Christ by making another, Mary,equal to Him, seem to impair the true sovereignty

of Christ by placing a popes decree above theLords word and that of His Apostle, and intendto cause all Catholics at the mass to worship theimage of the beast, couched in the seemingly benign exaltation of Our Lady. I believe it is the


16/36

Mother of the Lord, Mary herself, who mostdisapproves of this appropriation to come of her

image, after a long history in the Catholic Churchof an idolatrous worship of her that must beembarrassing to her personally, as well asinfuriating to her in the light of the agenda of those in the Vatican who appropriate her lovely image for their evil purposes. I do not believe the

Lord will allow the usurpation to go on muchbeyond this, but as Revelation foretold, it had togo this far. The Dragon who makes war on the

Woman is doing so in these days, and will attemptto do so by the means I have described.

My father, D.G. Bolerjack, was of the opinionthat in politics it was the big lie that works best.He was speaking of men like Hitler, McCarthy,Nixon. I think it applies in this case to what Ibelieve Benedict will do, idolizing Mary openly,

while covertly attacking her, and her Son, andbringing about the devastation of a Church that I,for one, loved so much, for so long, until theapocalypse forced me out of it. Perhaps all we cando now is await its final destruction, to be


17/36

_______________________________________

Michael Bolerjack Mad Bildungsroman

Volume 1: Derival Volume 2: Arrival

The parts to appear in short form soon comefrom a two-part history of my education anddevelopment in terms of derival and arrival.

_______________________________________

succeeded by the reign of Christ. On the otherhand, there are one billion Catholics, and they individually, or nationally, by orders, or en masse,are still free to follow their consciences, to takeaction against the abuses in the Church [of

children] already on record, and the darker intent[if that is possible] that I believe they point to,things hidden long in the bowels of the labyrinthin Rome. The forces of democracy nascent at theSecond Vatican Council may still assert


18/36

themselves, and the people of God take back theirChurch in the name of Christ. It is a simple

choice: a free, democratic church of Christ, or atotalitarian temple [dedicated to] of Caesar. May God forgive all who hold and teach the catholicfaith.

Praemunire

In the preparation of a defense of the actions of the butler and the nuns, it is not so muchnecessary to justify what they have done or aredoing, but to call into question the right of theiraccuser, the Pope. I believe the Pope bases hisauthority over them on long-held notions of sovereignty to which the medieval concept of thedivine right of kings is not foreign. But in whatsense is Joseph Ratzinger, Benedict XVI, a

king? If he claims sovereignty, it is probably insome sense as a king, of some sort, by divineright. Let us look at this. The liturgy of theRoman Catholic Church designates the lastSunday of the church year, just before the Advent


19/36

Season, as the Solemnity of Christ the King. Atany one time there can be but one king. And that

is Christ. It is Christ Who is Sovereign of theChurch, not the Pope. Does Christ need a man torepresent Him with, say, power of attorney, as Hisagent, in the see of Peter? The presence of theHoly Spirit in the Church indicates, if onebelieves, that God and Christ are already

represented and can directly affect events.Furthermore, in the case of each individual in theChurch there is the all-important conscience,

which as Cardinal Newman said is the Vicar of Christ in each person. I believe it is this spiritual

vicar whom the nuns and the butler are obeying,not the man on the throne in Rome, who is, inabsolute contradiction to the great teaching of

Vatican Council II, forcing them against theirconsciences, in precisely religious matters, whichthe Council said was the area in which the rights

of the individual conscience are to be mostdefended. Of course, the late catechism, signed by Cardinal Ratzinger, allowed the teaching of Newman in one place, while later stating thatCatholics cannot deliberately set their consciences


20/36

against the Magisterium. I believe one candeliberately violate ones conscience, but I cant

see how one deliberately sets it, rather it is theconscience that sets us. Since conscience is the Vicar of Christ, it is Christ Who sets theconscience. Also, the butler said he did what hedid in leaking Vatican documents while he wasunder the direct influence of the Holy Spirit. It

was Gods will. The Spirit blows where He will.God is free. The butler told investigators he saw evil all around him in the Church, this from a man

who had been at the Popes side day after day foryears. A Vatican psychiatrist said the butler suffersfrom a grave psychological disorder. From thesymptoms described, it seems to be a matter of anuneasy conscience, that is, a moral, not apsychological, problem the butler was suffering.Other matters, such as the planting of the check among the butlers papers, to make it look like he

is a common thief, are amazing. If he did not leak the documents to the press for a lot of money, why would he steal a check? As an employee orresident of Vatican City state, or some such, Isuppose he can be held accountable in the


21/36

Vatican court for his crime, but in terms of thetheological issues involved, the butler is on solid

ground. It was not a sin. It was an act of faith inGod out of love for His Church. The Pope, atone time a spiritual leader, has now become but atemporal ruler, like the popes of old, concernedabout money, law, politics and the enforcement of their right, at the same time asking for mercy

for the sex-abusing church priests and thehierarchy that covered up the crime. There issome kind of cognitive dissonance here. Does theChurch, then, have two Kings, Christ its spiritualsovereign and Benedict its temporal ruler? Weknow the history of the popes and emperors inthe middle ages. The pontiffs always held thespiritual ruler to be supreme. And so He is. Let usnever say we have no king but Caesar. Christ isKing. May He come quickly.

The sovereignty of Benedict being in dispute, andthe sovereignty of Christ recognized, let us appealto English law. The rule of Praemunire applied tothose who upheld papal supremacy in legalmatters involving the English King, and


22/36

convicted, those supporting the pope had toforfeit. A fortiori, if Praemunire is applied by

analogy to the current question. Christ is King inthe Church and in each individual in the Church. And, one cannot serve two masters, as the Lordsaid. Therefore, Benedict must forfeit. Certainly,Christ the King may have a Council of counselors, as other kings may have, but he needs

no other sovereign. I believe, as in the parable of the vineyard, the King will return to take it back,from those who have usurped it, men who beatand killed those He sent to speak for Him.Benedict, on his accession to the throne of Peter,claimed to be a mere laborer in the vineyard. Inother words, one who does not give to God whatis Gods. The Sovereign will soon claim what isrightfully His. He has chosen a group of

American nuns and the popes own butler tospeak on His behalf, to rebuke Peter to his face,

which seems to be a time immemorial job forthose in the Church. I call on cardinals andbishops to add their voices to those of the nuns,the butler, and their many lay supporters. Thank God these events are unfolding on the fiftieth


23/36

anniversary of the convening of the Second Vatican Council, which is still in living memory.

Blessed John XXIII said God spoke to him,directly, and told him to call the Council. Butacross the board the current pope and hispredecessor have besieged and attempted to rollback point-by-point the high water mark of theCatholic Church. In matters of practical

theology they have pretty much succeeded, butin terms of what may be called mysticaltheology, t hat is, the unique, individualrelationship of each Catholic with the Trinity, they

will not succeed. For the Kingdom of Heaven isindeed within us and cannot be overturned. Thisrelationship is forever, and will even outlast St.Peters and the so -called eternal city of Rome.


24/36

M I C H A E L B O L E R J A C K M I C H A E L K E N T B O L E R J A C K

I LEAH KT B OLE JCK I HEAL KT BJ OLE CK

Karat knight knot---- of journalism

Ol leo bravo lion

I heal kt lock be J lady Lock be J

Jock BelLock Jeb is cole king cole I heal kt

L be OK JCBock Jel

Joel b ck lock I heal kt be ok JC lI heal kt lock

BOLEJCK be J

OK JCBelI heal kt J be lock

Bel jock as in Bel Canto


25/36

M I C H A E L K E N T B O L E R J A C K

C H L K T B O J C K

HALE BLOCK KT JC

H husband

Half-block kt JC


26/36

R C M A E N

A H R C L E The Two-Part Prelude

T T P PE O T E

TT ET POPE

PET TO PET

CarmenRachel


27/36

C A R M E NEternal name

R A C H E LChurch eternal nameMagister anagrammatic

A R MAGISTER

R AM E

A C anagrammaticR A

AC EL NE

C R MR A H

Anagrammatic

EternalName ?

Xxxxx


28/36

RavennaChurchMagister

Roma

RamonaChurchMagister

AnagrammaticEternalName


29/36


30/36


CARMENI HL KET BOLE JACK I HELL KT BO E JACK I HELL KT BOEAK JCI HELL KT BE A KO JC


MARINELA

CH KE T BOLE JCK

(B) LEECH KT KO JC

CHEBLE

BLEECH KT JCHCE blokeCHEBLE KO

HE E bloke cheBlock HCE


31/36

M I C H A E L K E N T B O L E R J A C K --- ---

CARMENILL KT BO E AK JCKILL KT BE AO JCO BE A KILL KT JC


CARMEN

ILKT BOLE JACK O ILL KT BE AK JCO A KILL BE JC


RACHEL

MI KENT BOLE JACK MIKE B KT ALONE JC BE LOANENOLAK NO LAKE ALKE AKLE AKEL


32/36


MARIA CHEL KENT BOLEJCK BE NO HELL KT CK E JC

CH L KENT BOLE K JC

CH L KENT BLOKE JC

CHOKE BEL KT N JC

E

KT JC

CHEL EN BOLE AK

HELL CENBOEAK HELL BE NO CEAK

HELL BE NO K ACEBE NO HELL KT ACE JC


33/36

M I C H A E L K E N T B O L E R J A C K MARIA

CHELEN BOLEK

KT JCHELEN BE LOCK KT JCHELEN E BLOCK KT JC

KT JC

CHELENBOLEK HELL BEN COEK HELL BEN CE OK KT JC

KT KO BEN CE HELL JC


CHEL EN BOLEK KT JCCHOKE BEN ELL KT BEN OLEHOLE CKEL CHLK LIK CHE OLE JC

LECK CHELK HE OLE CLK


34/36

JC KT MIKE A NOBLE

BLEAK MIENO

IM ONE

BE LIKE NO AM

KT BE LIKE A MAN

KT BE LIKE O MAN JC

KT O MAN BE LIKE JC


35/36


CHEL KENT BOLEJCK

JC KT KO BEN CE HELLKT BEN JC

CHEL OLE K HELL COKE

M I C H A E L K E N T B O L E R J A C K RACHELMIKE BET ALONE JC

KT JC

MIKE NABOLE A NOBLEBE NO AL

IM KT BE ALONE K JC

MIKE BE KT ALONE JCMIKE BE A LONE KT JC


36/36

Documents

Rachel Weeping Her Children Part 1