Upload
juswadji-sudiono
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
1/41
D:\Geotech\sonic\CL-03\R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report.doc Page 1 of 41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering ServicesSpecialist in Design, Analysis, Supervision or Execution of:Dewatering - Pumping Test - Soil Nailing - MicroPile - Grouting -Soil Instrumentation - Pile/Plate Load Test - PDA -PIT - Vibrationmonitoring - Sonic Logging - Deep Foundations - Geosynthetics -Slope Stability - Ground Improvements & Other Geotechnical WorksAgent of PLAXIS computer software
GTL 8 Geylang East Ave 2 #02-05Singapore 389757Tel/Fax: 65-67461836Email : [email protected]
Report on
SONIC LOGGING TEST
For
CITYLOFTS PROJECT
Located at
Jalan KH Mas Mansyur
JAKARTA
VOL 3
By
GOUW Tjie Liong Ir., M.Eng.
Jakarta, August 19, 2005
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
2/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 2 19/08/2005
GTL
Report on
SONIC LOGGING TEST
forCITYLOFTS PROJECTJalan KH Mas Mansyur
JAKARTA
VOL 3
A. INTRODUCTION
To check the concrete integrity of bored piles at their on going CITYLOFTS project, PT.Duta Anggada Realty, has called for Sonic Logging Test. This report present the result of19 piles tested on August 12 and 13, 2005.
Up to this report 70 piles had been tested.
B. THE SONIC LOGGING TECHNIQUE
The Sonic Logging technique is used to detect defects in concrete structures such as castin-situ piles, caissons, barrettes and diaphragm walls.
Such tests can produce an economic survey of the homogeneity of each structure tocomplement the more expensive load capacity testing (pile loading test).
During the construction of caissons, bored and other cast-in-situ concrete piles, thefollowing defects may be encountered:
Honeycombing and/or Segregation due to improper concrete placement methods Washout of cement due to ground water flow Cracks in the pile shaft due to shrinkage Inclusion of soil causing contamination of concrete Necking and arching of the pile due to collapse of side walls during withdrawal of
temporary support / casing.
To perform the cross hole sonic logging, a number of steel tubes are installed duringconstruction of the foundation to allow the lowering of transmitter and receiver probes.Ultrasonic waves passed through the structures are delayed and absorbed depending onthe physical properties of the structure. The signal is displayed for interpretation.
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
3/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 3 19/08/2005
GTL
C. THE TEST RESULTS
The logging data are given in the appendix. The interpretation of the test results are givenbelow:
Table 1 The Test Result
Test No.Pile Design
Diameter (mm)Pile Reference
No.SONIC LOGGING
RESULTS
CONCLUSIONfrom
SONIC LOGGING
DateTested
FURTHER ACTIONREQUIRED
52 1000 21
relatively uniform signalalong 40-45m effective
length tested; One of thepipe clog at about 43 m
depth.
acceptable 13-Aug-05
Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to
proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 13 m from
top of sonic pipe.
53 1000 23
Uniform signal obtain alongthe 46 m pile tested. Veryweak signal at toe. Could
be soft toe
acceptable 13-Aug-05
54 1000 52Uniform signal along the
45m pile tested good pile 13-Aug-05
55 1000 53Uniform signal along the
45m pile tested good pile 13-Aug-05
56 1000 66relatively uniform signal
along 45m effective lengthtested
acceptable 12-Aug-05
57 1000 80slight signal delay at about5-6m; weak signal at toe
(soft toe)acceptable 12-Aug-05
58 1000 81relatively uniform signal
along 45m effective lengthtested
good pile 12-Aug-05
59 1000 320uniform signal along 43m
effective length tested;weak signal at toe (soft toe)
acceptable 12-Aug-05
60 1000 346relatively uniform signal
along the effective lengthtested;
acceptable 12-Aug-05
Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to
proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 14 m from
top of sonic pipe.
61 1000 348
relatively uniform signalalong 42m the effective
length tested; weak signalat toe (soft toe)
acceptable 12-Aug-05
Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to
proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 13 m from
top of sonic pipe.
August 12-13, 2005 SONIC LOGGING TEST RESULTS (Report Vol. 3)CITYLOFTS PROJECT - Jl. KH MAS MANSJUR - Jakarta
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
4/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 4 19/08/2005
GTL
Table 2 PILES THAT NEED IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
Test No.Pile Design
Diameter (mm)Pile Reference
No.SONIC LOGGING
RESULTSCONCLUSION
fromSONIC LOGGING
DateTested
FURTHER ACTIONREQUIRED
62 1000 48
Very weak signal /signallost at about 30 to 31.5 mdepth from ground (about
22.6-24.3m effectivelength); weak signal at toe
(soft toe)
defects at 30 to31.5m effective
length13-Aug-05
Coring / Jet grout / Replace
63 1000 54signal lost at 44 m depthfrom ground (about 42m
effective length)
defects at 41.8-42.2m effective
length13-Aug-05
Coring / Jet grout / Replace
64 1000 55
signal lost at 11-12m fromground (1-2m eff legnth)significant signal delay at23.5-24.5m from ground
(13.5-14.5m effective
length); soft toe
defects at 1-2m and13.5-14.5m effective
length13-Aug-05
Coring / Jet grout / Replace
65 1000 56
signal delay at 33m depth(25m eff. Length); signallost at 35.1-35.5m depth(27.1-27.5m eff. length)
defects at 25m and27.1-27.5m eff.
Length13-Aug-05 Coring / Jet grout /
Replace
66 1000 134significant signal delay at
38.5m; 46-47m depth(29.5; 37-38m eff length)
defects at 29.5m and37-38m eff. Length
13-Aug-05 Coring / Jet grout / Replace
67 1000 135
weak/lost of signal along11-18m; 25-27m; 36-
38m;48-49m (1-8; 15-17;26-28;38-39m eff length)
defects at 1-8; 15-17;26-28;38-39m eff
length13-Aug-05
BAUER has agreed tocore the pile to the
bottom to check thepile
68 1000 136Signal lost at 47-48m depth
(37-48m eff. Length)defects at 37-48m
eff. Length 13-Aug-05Coring / Jet grout /
Replace
69 1000 137
Signal lost at 18-19m depth(8-9m eff. Length); very
weak signal 2m from toe atloss signal at toe
defects at 37-48meff. Length; soft toe 13-Aug-05
Coring / Jet grout / Replace
70 1000 426
signal delay at 25.5; 27m(15.5-27m eff. Length); lostof signal at 43-43.5m (33-
43.5 eff.length)
defects at 15.5-27man 33-43.5 eff.length 12-Aug-05
Coring / Jet grout / Replace
Notes:
PILE THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
On Agust 18, 2005 meeting attended by DAR (Joko and Hutapea), GTL (Gouw), Arkonin (Juswadji, Zakky), Bauer (Tatok, Jatnoko,Fajar). Bauer has agreed to core pile no 135 and 137. Prior to coring PIT will be performed. Based on the result further action on thesuspected defected piles will be decided.
August 12-13, 2005 SONIC LOGGING TEST RESULTS (Report Vol. 3)CITYLOFTS PROJECT - Jl. KH MAS MANSJUR - Jakarta
Table 2 above, shows some of the piles that need immediate attention. The test resultsshows significant signal delay or signal lost. This indicating a certain defect or necking in
the piles.A meeting has been conducted on August 18, 2005. The meeting was attended by:
The Owner (PT Duta Anggada Mr. Joko and Mr. Hutapea) The Geotechnical Consultant (Gouw Tjie Liong) The Supervisor (PT Arkonin Mr. Juswadji, Mr. Zakky) The Piling Contractor (PT Bauer Pratama Indonesia Mr. Tatok, Mr. Jatnoko, Mr.
Fajar)
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
5/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 5 19/08/2005
GTL
During the meeting the suspected defective piles were discussed. It was presented thatpile no 51 and pile no 228 has been excavated, it was found out that indeed the piles hassome defects. The defective portion was totally hacked off and re-casted (see Table 3).
Table 3 Piles That Has Been Repaired
Test no. Pile DesignDiameter (mm)
Pile ReferenceNo.
SONIC LOGGINGRESULTS
CONCLUSIONfrom
SONIC LOGGING
DateTested
REMARK
47 1200 51
SIGNAL LOST at top 5 to7m from ground in all 3sonic pipes; very weak
signal at bottom
necking / significantdefects at top 5 to
7m; soft toe28-Jul-05
Pile has beenEXCAVATED, found
out that there aresoil/dirty
concrete/honey combsaround the concrete
sleeve. Inside the bodyof the pile is OK. Hack
off the top part andrecasted.
50 1000 228
SIGNAL LOST at top 3 to5.5m from ground in all 3sonic pipes; signal lost at50-50.3m in direction of
BC; the rest is OK
necking / significantdefects at top 3 to
5.5m; slight neckingat50-50.3m
28-Jul-05
Pile has been
EXCAVATED on July29, found out that thereare soil/dirty
concrete/honey combsaround the concretesleeve. The tie barexposed. Inside the
body of the pile is OK.Hack off the top part
and recasted onAugust 1.
PILE THAT HAS BEEN REPAIRED as of August 19, 2005
Figures 1 to 2 shows the defective pile no 228 when excavated.
Fig. 1 Condition of Pile 228 after Excavated(Defects clearly seen)
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
6/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 6 19/08/2005
GTL
Fig. 2 Condition of Pile 228 after Excavated(Defects clearly seen)
It was also decided that pile no 135 and 137 shall be immediately cored to the bottom toverify the pile integrity. Prior to that the pile, PT Bauer Pratama shall also perform PIT teston the piles. Further decision shall be taken when the PIT and coring results are available.
Jakarta, August 19, 2005Prepared by:
Ir. GOUW Tjie-Liong M.EngPrincipal - Certified Geotechnical Engineer (HATTI)
Encl: Sonic Logging Graphs (for piles tested on August 12-13, 2005)
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
7/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 7 19/08/2005
GTL
APPENDIX
THE TEST GRAPHS
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
8/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 8 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
9/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 9 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
10/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 10 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
11/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 11 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
12/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 12 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
13/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 13 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
14/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 14 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
15/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 15 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
16/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 16 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
17/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 17 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
18/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 18 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
19/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 19 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
20/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 20 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
21/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 21 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
22/41
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
23/41
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
24/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 24 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
25/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 25 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
26/41
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
27/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 27 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
28/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 28 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
29/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 29 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
30/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 30 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
31/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 31 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
32/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 32 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
33/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 33 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
34/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 34 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
35/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 35 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
36/41
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
37/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 37 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
38/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 38 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
39/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 39 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
40/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
Gouw TL Page 40 19/08/2005
GTL
8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report
41/41
Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services
GTL