R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    1/41

    D:\Geotech\sonic\CL-03\R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report.doc Page 1 of 41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering ServicesSpecialist in Design, Analysis, Supervision or Execution of:Dewatering - Pumping Test - Soil Nailing - MicroPile - Grouting -Soil Instrumentation - Pile/Plate Load Test - PDA -PIT - Vibrationmonitoring - Sonic Logging - Deep Foundations - Geosynthetics -Slope Stability - Ground Improvements & Other Geotechnical WorksAgent of PLAXIS computer software

    GTL 8 Geylang East Ave 2 #02-05Singapore 389757Tel/Fax: 65-67461836Email : [email protected]

    Report on

    SONIC LOGGING TEST

    For

    CITYLOFTS PROJECT

    Located at

    Jalan KH Mas Mansyur

    JAKARTA

    VOL 3

    By

    GOUW Tjie Liong Ir., M.Eng.

    Jakarta, August 19, 2005

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    2/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 2 19/08/2005

    GTL

    Report on

    SONIC LOGGING TEST

    forCITYLOFTS PROJECTJalan KH Mas Mansyur

    JAKARTA

    VOL 3

    A. INTRODUCTION

    To check the concrete integrity of bored piles at their on going CITYLOFTS project, PT.Duta Anggada Realty, has called for Sonic Logging Test. This report present the result of19 piles tested on August 12 and 13, 2005.

    Up to this report 70 piles had been tested.

    B. THE SONIC LOGGING TECHNIQUE

    The Sonic Logging technique is used to detect defects in concrete structures such as castin-situ piles, caissons, barrettes and diaphragm walls.

    Such tests can produce an economic survey of the homogeneity of each structure tocomplement the more expensive load capacity testing (pile loading test).

    During the construction of caissons, bored and other cast-in-situ concrete piles, thefollowing defects may be encountered:

    Honeycombing and/or Segregation due to improper concrete placement methods Washout of cement due to ground water flow Cracks in the pile shaft due to shrinkage Inclusion of soil causing contamination of concrete Necking and arching of the pile due to collapse of side walls during withdrawal of

    temporary support / casing.

    To perform the cross hole sonic logging, a number of steel tubes are installed duringconstruction of the foundation to allow the lowering of transmitter and receiver probes.Ultrasonic waves passed through the structures are delayed and absorbed depending onthe physical properties of the structure. The signal is displayed for interpretation.

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    3/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 3 19/08/2005

    GTL

    C. THE TEST RESULTS

    The logging data are given in the appendix. The interpretation of the test results are givenbelow:

    Table 1 The Test Result

    Test No.Pile Design

    Diameter (mm)Pile Reference

    No.SONIC LOGGING

    RESULTS

    CONCLUSIONfrom

    SONIC LOGGING

    DateTested

    FURTHER ACTIONREQUIRED

    52 1000 21

    relatively uniform signalalong 40-45m effective

    length tested; One of thepipe clog at about 43 m

    depth.

    acceptable 13-Aug-05

    Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to

    proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 13 m from

    top of sonic pipe.

    53 1000 23

    Uniform signal obtain alongthe 46 m pile tested. Veryweak signal at toe. Could

    be soft toe

    acceptable 13-Aug-05

    54 1000 52Uniform signal along the

    45m pile tested good pile 13-Aug-05

    55 1000 53Uniform signal along the

    45m pile tested good pile 13-Aug-05

    56 1000 66relatively uniform signal

    along 45m effective lengthtested

    acceptable 12-Aug-05

    57 1000 80slight signal delay at about5-6m; weak signal at toe

    (soft toe)acceptable 12-Aug-05

    58 1000 81relatively uniform signal

    along 45m effective lengthtested

    good pile 12-Aug-05

    59 1000 320uniform signal along 43m

    effective length tested;weak signal at toe (soft toe)

    acceptable 12-Aug-05

    60 1000 346relatively uniform signal

    along the effective lengthtested;

    acceptable 12-Aug-05

    Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to

    proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 14 m from

    top of sonic pipe.

    61 1000 348

    relatively uniform signalalong 42m the effective

    length tested; weak signalat toe (soft toe)

    acceptable 12-Aug-05

    Check the elevation ofthe sonic pipe to

    proved that the soundconcrete at the cut offlevel. Reason: the logshows sound concretestarting from 13 m from

    top of sonic pipe.

    August 12-13, 2005 SONIC LOGGING TEST RESULTS (Report Vol. 3)CITYLOFTS PROJECT - Jl. KH MAS MANSJUR - Jakarta

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    4/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 4 19/08/2005

    GTL

    Table 2 PILES THAT NEED IMMEDIATE ATTENTION

    Test No.Pile Design

    Diameter (mm)Pile Reference

    No.SONIC LOGGING

    RESULTSCONCLUSION

    fromSONIC LOGGING

    DateTested

    FURTHER ACTIONREQUIRED

    62 1000 48

    Very weak signal /signallost at about 30 to 31.5 mdepth from ground (about

    22.6-24.3m effectivelength); weak signal at toe

    (soft toe)

    defects at 30 to31.5m effective

    length13-Aug-05

    Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    63 1000 54signal lost at 44 m depthfrom ground (about 42m

    effective length)

    defects at 41.8-42.2m effective

    length13-Aug-05

    Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    64 1000 55

    signal lost at 11-12m fromground (1-2m eff legnth)significant signal delay at23.5-24.5m from ground

    (13.5-14.5m effective

    length); soft toe

    defects at 1-2m and13.5-14.5m effective

    length13-Aug-05

    Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    65 1000 56

    signal delay at 33m depth(25m eff. Length); signallost at 35.1-35.5m depth(27.1-27.5m eff. length)

    defects at 25m and27.1-27.5m eff.

    Length13-Aug-05 Coring / Jet grout /

    Replace

    66 1000 134significant signal delay at

    38.5m; 46-47m depth(29.5; 37-38m eff length)

    defects at 29.5m and37-38m eff. Length

    13-Aug-05 Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    67 1000 135

    weak/lost of signal along11-18m; 25-27m; 36-

    38m;48-49m (1-8; 15-17;26-28;38-39m eff length)

    defects at 1-8; 15-17;26-28;38-39m eff

    length13-Aug-05

    BAUER has agreed tocore the pile to the

    bottom to check thepile

    68 1000 136Signal lost at 47-48m depth

    (37-48m eff. Length)defects at 37-48m

    eff. Length 13-Aug-05Coring / Jet grout /

    Replace

    69 1000 137

    Signal lost at 18-19m depth(8-9m eff. Length); very

    weak signal 2m from toe atloss signal at toe

    defects at 37-48meff. Length; soft toe 13-Aug-05

    Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    70 1000 426

    signal delay at 25.5; 27m(15.5-27m eff. Length); lostof signal at 43-43.5m (33-

    43.5 eff.length)

    defects at 15.5-27man 33-43.5 eff.length 12-Aug-05

    Coring / Jet grout / Replace

    Notes:

    PILE THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION

    On Agust 18, 2005 meeting attended by DAR (Joko and Hutapea), GTL (Gouw), Arkonin (Juswadji, Zakky), Bauer (Tatok, Jatnoko,Fajar). Bauer has agreed to core pile no 135 and 137. Prior to coring PIT will be performed. Based on the result further action on thesuspected defected piles will be decided.

    August 12-13, 2005 SONIC LOGGING TEST RESULTS (Report Vol. 3)CITYLOFTS PROJECT - Jl. KH MAS MANSJUR - Jakarta

    Table 2 above, shows some of the piles that need immediate attention. The test resultsshows significant signal delay or signal lost. This indicating a certain defect or necking in

    the piles.A meeting has been conducted on August 18, 2005. The meeting was attended by:

    The Owner (PT Duta Anggada Mr. Joko and Mr. Hutapea) The Geotechnical Consultant (Gouw Tjie Liong) The Supervisor (PT Arkonin Mr. Juswadji, Mr. Zakky) The Piling Contractor (PT Bauer Pratama Indonesia Mr. Tatok, Mr. Jatnoko, Mr.

    Fajar)

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    5/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 5 19/08/2005

    GTL

    During the meeting the suspected defective piles were discussed. It was presented thatpile no 51 and pile no 228 has been excavated, it was found out that indeed the piles hassome defects. The defective portion was totally hacked off and re-casted (see Table 3).

    Table 3 Piles That Has Been Repaired

    Test no. Pile DesignDiameter (mm)

    Pile ReferenceNo.

    SONIC LOGGINGRESULTS

    CONCLUSIONfrom

    SONIC LOGGING

    DateTested

    REMARK

    47 1200 51

    SIGNAL LOST at top 5 to7m from ground in all 3sonic pipes; very weak

    signal at bottom

    necking / significantdefects at top 5 to

    7m; soft toe28-Jul-05

    Pile has beenEXCAVATED, found

    out that there aresoil/dirty

    concrete/honey combsaround the concrete

    sleeve. Inside the bodyof the pile is OK. Hack

    off the top part andrecasted.

    50 1000 228

    SIGNAL LOST at top 3 to5.5m from ground in all 3sonic pipes; signal lost at50-50.3m in direction of

    BC; the rest is OK

    necking / significantdefects at top 3 to

    5.5m; slight neckingat50-50.3m

    28-Jul-05

    Pile has been

    EXCAVATED on July29, found out that thereare soil/dirty

    concrete/honey combsaround the concretesleeve. The tie barexposed. Inside the

    body of the pile is OK.Hack off the top part

    and recasted onAugust 1.

    PILE THAT HAS BEEN REPAIRED as of August 19, 2005

    Figures 1 to 2 shows the defective pile no 228 when excavated.

    Fig. 1 Condition of Pile 228 after Excavated(Defects clearly seen)

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    6/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 6 19/08/2005

    GTL

    Fig. 2 Condition of Pile 228 after Excavated(Defects clearly seen)

    It was also decided that pile no 135 and 137 shall be immediately cored to the bottom toverify the pile integrity. Prior to that the pile, PT Bauer Pratama shall also perform PIT teston the piles. Further decision shall be taken when the PIT and coring results are available.

    Jakarta, August 19, 2005Prepared by:

    Ir. GOUW Tjie-Liong M.EngPrincipal - Certified Geotechnical Engineer (HATTI)

    Encl: Sonic Logging Graphs (for piles tested on August 12-13, 2005)

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    7/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 7 19/08/2005

    GTL

    APPENDIX

    THE TEST GRAPHS

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    8/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 8 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    9/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 9 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    10/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 10 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    11/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 11 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    12/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 12 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    13/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 13 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    14/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 14 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    15/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 15 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    16/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 16 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    17/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 17 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    18/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 18 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    19/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 19 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    20/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 20 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    21/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 21 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    22/41

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    23/41

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    24/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 24 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    25/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 25 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    26/41

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    27/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 27 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    28/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 28 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    29/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 29 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    30/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 30 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    31/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 31 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    32/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 32 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    33/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 33 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    34/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 34 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    35/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 35 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    36/41

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    37/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 37 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    38/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 38 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    39/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 39 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    40/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    Gouw TL Page 40 19/08/2005

    GTL

  • 8/7/2019 R3-050819-Sonic Complete Report

    41/41

    Geotechnical Contractor & Engineering Services

    GTL