R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    1/16

    Delivering Oracle Success

    R12 Upgrade versus

    Re-implementation andImpact Analysis

    John Malone

    RMOUG QEWAugust 19, 2011

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    2/16

    DBAK2011 2

    About DBAK

    Oracle solution provider

    Co-founded in 2005Based in Englewood, CO

    2008 Emerging Business of the Year SouthMetro Denver Chamber of Commerce

    More than 140 implementations, upgrades,conversions, and support projects for 90+ clients

    Average 15 years of Oracle expertise

    Oracle Gold Partner

    OEM Specialized

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    3/16

    DBAK2011 3

    Agenda

    Upgrade vs. Re-implementation

    Impact AnalysisCase Studies

    Questions

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    4/16

    DBAK2011 4

    Upgrade vs. Reimplementation

    Data quality

    Changes to Key FlexfieldsMultiple Oracle EBS environments

    Significant changes to business structures(acquisitions, mergers, re-organizations) sinceinitial implementation

    Number and complexity of customizations

    Changes to business process requirements

    Oracle EBS version

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    5/16

    Upgrade vs. Reimplementation

    DBAK2011 5

    Has your business structure changed

    significantly since your implementation

    ( more/less business units/orgs,

    currencies, shared services)

    Do you wish to make changes to

    configurations that cannot be easilymodified (flexfield structures, Customizations,

    Calendar)

    Does your Application configuration still meet

    your business requirements? (considering

    growth,expansion, acquisition)

    How significantly have you integrated

    with 3rd party applications that could be

    replaced with new Oracle Applications

    modules, features or functionality?

    They meet our

    requirementsA change is needed

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Not Much

    Our structure is correct

    for our needs

    Our existing

    configuration is OK

    We require

    changes

    Our structure

    needs to change

    Significantly

    Upgrade Re - Implement

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    6/16

    DBAK2011 6

    R12 Methodology

    Training

    Test

    Iteration 1

    Post-Production Support

    Test

    Iteration 2

    Test

    Iteration 3

    Phase IIPhase I

    - New Features Prioritization- Technical Architecture Analysis- Application Architecture Analysis- Assessment Review- Project Scope- Project Schedule

    R12 Assessment and Impact Analysis

    UAT

    Planning and Execution Milestones R12 Go Live

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    7/16

    DBAK2011 7

    Impact Analysis

    New Features Prioritization

    Technical Architecture AnalysisApplication Architecture Analysis

    Assessment Review

    Project ScopeProject Schedule

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    8/16

    DBAK2011 8

    Impact Analysis

    New Features PrioritizationNew/Changed R12 Features and Functionality

    Review existing (standard and custom) functionality within 11i andlook for opportunities to leverage new features within R12

    Primary goals are to: Remove customizations where possible Identify opportunities to leverage new R12 functionality

    Analyze impacts to current business processes and determine theapproach going forward with R12 Determine which new features will be included in the R12 upgrade

    and which features could be included in post upgrade projects Reference Materials

    Release Content Documents (RCD) Release Value Proposition (RVP) documents Product specific upgrade guides (e.g. Financials, Procurement) Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.x Information Center

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    9/16

    DBAK2011 9

    Impact Analysis

    Technical Architecture AnalysisTechnical Architecture

    Analyze impacts to the infrastructure between 11i and R12 Servers Operating System version Database version Application Server version Disk Space (Storage) requirements Reporting Workstations (e.g. browsers, memory, CPU) Third party software impacts

    Reference Materials Upgrade Guide for 11i to R12

    R12 Infrastructure - Differences between 11i and 12 Oracle Applications Release 12 Upgrade Sizing and Best Practices

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    10/16

    DBAK2011 10

    Impact Analysis

    Application Architecture AnalysisApplication Architecture and Extensions/Customizations

    Interfaces with 3rd party applications Workflow Reporting tools (e.g. BI Publisher, e-Text) New application modules Impact to existing extensions/customizations

    Reference Materials Upgrade Guide for 11i to R12 11.5.10 to 12.x EBS Object Changes

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    11/16

    DBAK2011 11

    Impact Analysis

    Assessment ReviewReview Impact Analysis results

    Project ScopeDevelop Project Scope Determine Upgrade or Reimplementation Approach Consider:

    Technical Architecture Impact Applications Architecture and Extensions/Customizations Impact New/Changed Features Prioritization Functional and Business Process Impact Assessment

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    12/16

    DBAK2011 12

    Impact Analysis

    Project ScheduleDevelop Project Schedule based on Impact Assessment results

    Including timeline, resources, and cost Leverage experienced R12 resources to supplement internal team

    members Project schedule/plan Reference Materials

    E-Business Suite Technical Guided Upgrade Path from 11.5.10.2 to12.1.3

    Planning Your Oracle E-Business Suite Upgrade from Release 11i toRelease 12.1

    Next StepsOrganize and launch Phase II (Upgrade) Determine if you want to use Maintenance Wizard or other tools

    (MS-Project, Excel) to track and manage upgrade tasks Start Iteration 1 test and customizations migration

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    13/16

    Case Study R12 Upgrade for an Energy Company

    Company Description

    Leading provider in the mid-stream services for thenatural gas industry. Headquartered in Denver, thecompany is engaged in the gathering, processing andtransportation of natural gas; the transportation,fractionation, storage and marketing of NGLs; and thegathering and transportation of crude oil.

    Management Challenge

    The company implemented Oracle Financials, Projects,iExpense, and Logical Apps in the 2007-2008. They haveapproximately 200 core application users and all

    employees are iExpense users. They have a moderatenumber of extensions/ customizations and severalmission critical interfaces between Oracle EBS and theirrevenue/operations applications.

    The project objective was to migrate the Oracleapplications from 11.5.10 to R12 and also upgrade thedatabase from 10g to 11g. The upgrade would beinstalled on a new server and include an upgrade of theoperating system.

    High level planning had been completed but the approachfor executing the project had not been determined.

    Scope

    Develop the methodology and tools for completing the R12upgrade project.

    Conduct the upgrade assessments to define the projectscope, resource requirements, and project schedule.

    Manage the upgrade project tasks, resources, issues, andrisks

    Results

    Completed the impact analysis for new/changed features,customizations, application architecture and infrastructure

    Created a detail project schedule and assigned resourcesto the various work streams.

    Utilized extract out of Maintenance Wizard to create theinitial list of upgrade tasks

    Completed three upgrade test cycles (iterations) and UserAcceptance testing

    Created end user training materials and conducted trainingcourses

    Executed the production cutover plan to complete theupgrade over a weekend to minimize impact on dailybusiness operations.

    Project was completed on-time (6 months) and underbudget. There were very few post-production issues.

    13 DBAK2011 13

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    14/16

    Case Study R12 Implementation for Services Company

    Company Description

    Leading provider of software and services that help theworlds best companies manage their extended workforceand procured services.

    Global provider of contingent labor.

    Management Challenge

    The companies Oracle E-Business suite had not beenupgraded in many years (version 11.5.4), howeverbusiness changes required changes in how the companyused Oracle.

    Due to increasing volume and a need for additional

    flexibility, a custom front office application wasdeveloped to replace Oracle Projects. The legacyProjects data still exists and there is a large quantityof data that is no longer used.

    Implement new module: Fixed Assets.

    Consolidation of many operating units

    The company wanted to expand use Oracle functionalityto enable business processes

    The company wanted to take advantage of new

    features within Oracle R12 Enable existing functionality not being used to

    automate business processes

    Key implementation versus upgrade decision factors

    Limited Down-time available for cutover

    11.5.4 version expanded the tasks required forupgrade

    The company is switching to a new hardwareplatform

    Scope - Re-implement Oracle E-Business Suite (R12.1.3)

    Impact Assessment

    Review existing 11i functionality New R12 functionality

    Prioritize new features

    Leverage setups from existing 11i system

    Re-implement Oracle R12 for existing modules

    Migrate required customizations and interfaces to R12

    Limited Data Conversion:

    GL Balances and current year transactions

    AR/AP Customers/Suppliers AR/AP Open invoices

    Fixed Assets load existing into R12

    System Setup / System Validation / Integration Testing

    Migration to Production

    Expected Results

    Expand usage of current Oracle functionality to enablebusiness processes

    Ability to use new R12 functionality

    Reduction of customizations

    Clean-up of old/non-used data

    Ability to quickly cut-over to the new system

    Deployment on new hardware platform

    Consolidated operating units

    14 DBAK2011 14

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    15/16

    DBAK2011 15

    Questions

  • 8/22/2019 R12 Upgrade Versus Reimplementation RMOUG QEW Aug 19 2011

    16/16

    DBAK2011 16

    Contact

    J ohn Malone

    720.475-8600

    [email protected]

    Presentation available at:www.dbaknow.com/downloads

    www.dbaknow.com