United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Official Hearing Exhibit

In the Matter of: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

ASLBP #: 07-858-03-LR-BD01 Docket #: 05000247 | 05000286 Exhibit #: Identified: Admitted: Withdrawn: Rejected: Stricken:

Other:

NYS000480-00-BD01 6/12/20136/12/2013

NYS000480 Submitted: June 10, 2013

c:..\,.~""R REGU(.q;.

l~\ • 0 · . · . ~ ~ '(' .... 1- 0'

? ~ ****il

0

0

o

ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD I EN·Ep·S·002·MUL TI I REV. 1

Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 14 OF 15 General Visual Inspection

ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPEIT ANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Sheet 1 of2

NOTE: A photographic record of each indication should be retained with the inspection report.

LinelTank 10 & Name: 8-in . City Water Line 1502

System: City Water

Location: IP2 Transformer Yard

Coating Material : coal tar enamel/saturated asbestos felt wrap

Work Order: 323250-02

Inspection Date: 12/13/2012

Inspector: J_ Peterson

Thickness: iaw AWWA C203

Backfill Makeup:

Contains Rocks? Yes [ No [X]

I Not Coated

Description: No rocks were observed to be in contact with the pipe. However some rocks were found in the backfill. See pictures attached.

Contains Other Foreign Objects? Yes [ No [X] Description: ____________ _

Note

1. Any Mechanical Damage? Yes [ ] No [X]

2_ Any Holiday/Hole? Yes [ ] No [X]

3_ Any Blistering? Yes [ ] No [X]

4. Any Peeling? Yes [ ] No [X]

5. Any Flaking? Yes [ ] No [X]

6. Any Delamination? Yes [ ] No [X]

7. Any Embrittlement? Yes [ ] No [Xl

8. Any Embedded Rocks (Coating and/or Base)? Yes [ I No [X]

9_ Any Cracking? Yes [X] No [X]

10. Any Gouges? Yes [ ] No [X]

11_ Any Rusting? Yes [X] No [ ]

12. Other? Yes [ ] No [X]

Any Yes answer requires a CR to be Initiated

General Appearance: A portion of the 8·inch City Water line (# 1502) supply to the AFW pumps was

excavated and visually inspected. The total length of the city water line inspected full circumference was

approx.10 ft. Some areas along inspected length of pipe were observed to have localized coating cracking

and signs of rust.

Degradation Found? Yes [X ] No [ ] Further Evaluation Required? Yes [X] No [ ]

)

o

o

ENTERGY ENGINEERING STANDARD EN-EP-S-002-MULTI REV. 1

Underground Piping and Tanks PAGE 140F 15 General Visual Inspection

ATTACHMENT 7.2 PIPE/TANK COATING VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Sheet 2 of2

Comments: Recommend coating removal to bare metal at locations having degraded coating and

performing UT to determine if any significant wall loss. Photos and sketch attached. Ref: Drawings 9321-

2236 and 9321-2237

CR Required? Yes [X 1 No [ 1 CR No. CR-IP2-2013-00131

Performed By: -'J!.\oo!l>Se!<lpl!h!JFc.",,!,p:J;emte2!.rl>!s~~;<~qt&:2;I<:..:.' '-.:::::; .... =.:1"'!4:1oc;,~::>.~_::.-_ Date: 04/12/2013

Program Owner or Qualified Designee: Nelson Azevedo I ~ ~?,@.... Date: 04/12/2013

o o EXC 4-2/ EXCAVATION OF 22 MT OUTSIDE MOAT AREA

Piping Uncovered for inspection: 2-inch City Water Line 1511 supply to VC 8-inch City Water Line 1502 supply to AFW pumps 1.5-in WC Line to VC

•

.Yi' PRe~sU~T'OW L.IIJe FOR PENETRATION'S Se:E o-...JG. ° c\:!>ZI-S:<--'O'30=-

O ~

• I ... 1-1 ... --

• e.Vo I2'-W:°-<j I ~i~~~\i\ I

~

o -, .. \. c."""

,

l~ Ref: Drawing 9321-2236

o

u ;)

o City

Line 1502 =-..... :.. upplyto AFW

o

o

o

)