2
Quiz 2 Courts jurisdiction Sandiganbayan 1. Money laundering case where private indivual conspire with public ofcer (i only !oney laundering private persons "#C $ "#C 2. City !ayor accused o rape "#C %. &ccounting cler' who alsi es docu!ent )C (designated "#C*s$ +. & gang rape where accused are aged 1,- 1 - and 2/ )C (designated "#C*s$ /. "obbery when victi! is 10 years old and the accused are all o legal aged "#C 0. here i!posable penalty is 0years and 1 day M#C C 3 ,. Slight physical injuries in a ru!ble in cogon !ar'et cdo "#C . &ppeal to rst level courts M#C 4. 5!posable penalty is 0 years and a ne clai!ed is one !illion pesos C& 16. &ctions or annul!ent o judge!ent o "#C. Quiz % 17% three grounds o the si8 raised in !otion to 9uash led by the accused in sanchez vs e!etrio +7/ jurisdiction o sandiganbayan 0. authority o o!buds!an to investigate any illegal act or o!ission o public ofcial is not an e8clusive :ut rather a concurrent authority . true. &ccused !ay renounce the right to present a preli!inary investigation 4. alse . accused can not waived his right to present counter afdavit or any other evidence in his deense 16. alse. &bsence o ;5 investigation is jurisdictional

Quiz 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Quiz 2Courts jurisdiction Sandiganbayan 1. Money laundering case where private indivual conspire with public officer (if only money laundering private persons RTC )RTC 2. City mayor accused of rapeRTC 3. Accounting clerk who falsifies documentFC (designated RTCs) 4. A gang rape where accused are aged 17, 18 , and 25FC (designated RTCs) 5. Robbery when victim is 16 years old and the accused are all of legal agedRTC 6. Where imposable penalty is 6years and 1 dayMTC CDO 7. Slight physical injuries in a rumble in cogon market cdoRTC 8. Appeal to first level courtsMTC 9. Imposable penalty is 6 years and a fine claimed is one million pesosCA 10. Actions for annulment of judgement of RTC.

Quiz 31-3 three grounds of the six raised in motion to quash filed by the accused in sanchez vs Demetrio4-5 jurisdiction of sandiganbayan6. authority of ombudsman to investigate any illegal act or omission of public official is not an exclusive But rather a concurrent authority 8. true. Accused may renounce the right to present a preliminary investigation 9. false . accused can not waived his right to present counter affidavit or any other evidence in his defense10. false. Absence of PI investigation is jurisdictional