Questionnaire Views on the Possible Influence And

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Questionnaire Views on the Possible Influence And

    1/3

    Questionnaire

    Views on the Possible Influence and Interpenetration of Psychology and

    Feminism in India

    Kindly share your experiences and thoughts on how and whether feminist inquiry (feministmovement of various forms, or womens movement -women studies) has influenced thepractice of psychology in India. Your feedback will support preparation of the paperLocatingthe Feminist Standpoint in Practice of Psychology Today: A case of India to be publishedintheHandbook of international feminisms: Perspectives on psychology, women, culture, andrights" (New York: Springer, forthcoming).The abstract of the paper can be found at the endof this questionnaire.

    Please elaborate on these questions.

    1 How do you define your research and intellectual engagements within psychology?

    2. (How) Has your work been influenced by feminism (of whichever orientation or

    form) and if yes, how has it shaped your thinking and influenced the way you

    practice psychology?

    3. What in your view is the state of psychology in India today? a) Please share your

    experiences and thoughts on what you think has been the contribution of the

    discipline of psychology in India, how is it faring in the country (in terms of academicoutput, research and public engagements etc) , or share your personal experiences

    and encounters from within your own organization/ institution/ broad geographical

    region you come from. b) Please also evaluate whether your own work has taken a

    different trajectory or extended existent modes of thinking and practice.

    4. Do you visualize a greater exchange between psychology and feminism and what

    sort of interpenetration and cross-fertilization of praxis and ideas do you think is

    needed?

    5. What are the biggest challenges towards practicing a feminist psychology inIndia?

    6. Do you see a difference between what womens movement and feminist

    movement in India have to offer to the discipline of psychology? Are there unique

    challenges and differences in the struggles and concerns of these two movements?

    7. Please write here any other comments you may have.

    Please fill in these details about yourself

    Your details

  • 8/14/2019 Questionnaire Views on the Possible Influence And

    2/3

    Name:

    Age range (tick one):

    20-30

    31-40

    41-50

    51-60

    Above 60

    Gender:

    Organizational affiliation:

    Email:

    Any Publications (relevant to the theme of this paper):

    Feminist Engagements and Associations where you are involved:

    Any comments:

    Thanks a lot for your time and assistance! A copy of this paper can be sent to you if

    you are interested. Please make sure you provide your email or address in that case.

  • 8/14/2019 Questionnaire Views on the Possible Influence And

    3/3

    ** Please do not quote or cite from this w/o permission of the author**

    Abstract of the proposed chapter

    Locating the Feminist Standpoint in Practice of Psychology Today: A case of India

    Manasi Kumar

    The chapter is divided into four sections. The first section attempts to retrace the history of

    psychology in India with a view to recount how the feminist movement developed, shaped

    and interrogated social sciences particularly the discipline of psychology. The attempt is to

    present various hues of the Indian feminist movement and discuss ideological underpinnings,

    dissident voices that contributed directly or indirectly to the enterprise of modern psychology

    in the Indian context. It also delves into the political clashes between the radical Marxist /

    feminist and the socialist (ala Lohia) formations associated with the womens movement

    with a view to present different worldviews and ideologies on class, caste, secularism,

    marriage, development, womens rights and liberation that persists between these two cartels

    and how these influence the discipline. Were these oppositions substantial or merely

    narcissism of minor (political) differences?

    The second section goes over the existent patriarchal set-up of academic psychology where

    there exists many more natural sciences inspired male scientists/teachers and

    students/followers who continue to be largely young women. The idiosyncratic

    developments within academic psychology in India are discussed in this light. In this

    scenario, the question is whether feminist enterprise has failed to penetrate the academicpsychology arena or in its continued disengaged stance it conveys a voice of dissent of its

    own kind. What shape and form this disengagement has taken is another matter of concern.

    The third section sets out on a small empirical exercise of surveying women academics in

    psychology departments in the country to seek their voices and opinions on the twinned

    questions of the fate of psychology and feminist movement today. It explores their own

    contributions, failures, disappointments, and achievements in making psychology more

    egalitarian, humane, socially relevant and politically committed discipline.

    Finally the paper picks up postcolonial feminist writer Mahashweta Devis works to explore

    portrayal of womens complex identities, struggles and choices and to debate whether andhow psychology in India can be inclusive enterprise and open itself responsibly to the public

    sphere.