27
Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki

  • Upload
    jafari

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Gender:. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Age:. Questionnaire on well-being at work Background - Employment:. Questionnaire on well-being at work - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at work 2011 University of Helsinki

Page 2: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Gender:

Female Male0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

67%

33%

Al l (Mean: 1.33, Deviation: 1.105) (Responses: 3880)

Page 3: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Age:

-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

15%

29%24% 23%

9%

Al l (Mean: 2.837, Deviation: 1.564) (Responses: 3957)

Page 4: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Employment:

Fixed-term

Unti l further notice

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

41%

59%

Al l (Mean: 1.588, Deviation: 1.115) (Responses: 3947)

Page 5: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Duration of employment at the university:

less than 2 years

2-5 years

6-9 years

10-13 years

more than 14 years

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

19%

26%

14%

12%

29%

Al l (Mean: 3.071, Deviation: 1.817) (Responses: 3961)

Page 6: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Position:

Teaching or research staff

Other

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

48%

52%

Al l (Mean: 1.524, Deviation: 1.118) (Responses: 3992)

Page 7: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Do you work in a supervisory position?

Yes No0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

19%

82%

Al l (Mean: 1.815, Deviation: 1.073) (Responses: 3863)

Page 8: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty

Faculty of Theology

Faculty of Law

Faculty of Medic ine

Faculty of Arts

Faculty of Sc ience

Faculty of Pharmacy

Faculty of Biological and Env ironmental Sc iences

Faculty of Behav ioural Sc iences

Faculty of Soc ial Sc iences

Swedish School of Soc ial Sc ience

Faculty of Agriculture and Fores try

Faculty of Veterinary Medic ine

Independent ins titutes

Central adminis tration

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2%

2%

10%

6%

11%

2%

6%

8%

5%

1%

6%

5%

27%

9%

All (Mean: 8.899, Dev iation: 4.219) (Responses : 4032)

Page 9: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Medicine

Facul ty of Medicine

Insti tute of Biomedicine

Insti tute of Dentistry

Hjel t Insti tute

Insti tute of Cl inical Medicine

Haartman Insti tute

Uni t of Research programmes

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

18%

18%

8%

14%

13%

14%

15%

Al l (Mean: 3.86, Deviation: 2.334) (Responses: 421)

Page 10: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Arts

Facul ty of Arts

Department of Phi losophy, H istory, Cul ture and Art Studies

Department of World Cul tures

Department of Modern Languages

Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

22%

24%

11%

24%

20%

Al l (Mean: 2.959, Deviation: 1.771) (Responses: 246)

Page 11: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Science

Facul ty of Science

Department of Physics

Department of Geosciences and Geography

Department of Chemistry

Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Department of Computer Science

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

10%

31%

14%

25%

6%

14%

Al l (Mean: 3.302, Deviation: 1.843) (Responses: 437)

Page 12: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences

Facul ty of B iological and Envi ronmental Sciences

Ki lpisjärvi Biological Station

Lammi Biological Station

Tvärminne Zoological Station

Department of Biosciences

Department of Envi ronmental Sciences

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

17%

4%

5%

5%

48%

22%

Al l (Mean: 4.289, Deviation: 2.004) (Responses: 256)

Page 13: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Behavioural Sciences

Facul ty of Behavioural Sciences

Insti tute of Behavioural Sciences

Department of Teacher Education

Helsinki Teacher Training School

Vi ikki Teacher Training School

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

14%

33%

29%

6%

18%

Al l (Mean: 2.802, Deviation: 1.62) (Responses: 318)

Page 14: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Social Sciences

Facul ty of Social Sciences

Department of Economic and Pol i tical Studies

Department of Social Studies

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

20%

36%

44%

Al l (Mean: 2.232, Deviation: 1.26) (Responses: 181)

Page 15: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry

Facul ty of Agricul ture and Forestry

Department of Food and Environmental Sciences

Department of Agricul tural Sciences

Department of Forest Sciences

Department of Forest Sciences - Station (Hyytiälä or Värriö)

Department of Economics and Management

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

14%

33%

24%

15%

3%

11%

Al l (Mean: 2.925, Deviation: 1.763) (Responses: 255)

Page 16: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

Facul ty of Veterinary Medicine

Veterinary Teaching Hospi tal

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

73%

27%

Al l (Mean: 1.269, Deviation: 1.094) (Responses: 216)

Page 17: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Independent institutes

In dep en de n t i n sti tu tes

Ope n Un ive rs i ty

He ls i nk i In sti tu te o f Phys i cs

He l s in k i Un i ve rs i ty L ib ra ry

IPR Un ive rs i ty Cen te r

Lan gu ag e Cen tre

Fi nn i sh Mu seu m o f N a tu ra l H i s to ry

Ru ra l i a In sti tu te

Cen te r fo r In fo rma ti on Tech no l og y

He l s in k i C o l l e g iu m fo r Ad vance d Stud ie s

0% 20% 40% 60 % 80 % 10 0%

3%

2%

4%

7%

2%

0%

12 %

2%

0%

14%

6%

9%

7%

2%

3%

3%

10%

10%

2%

3%

Al l (Mea n : 11 .2 28 , D evia ti o n : 5 .28 5 ) (Resp on ses: 10 96 )

Page 18: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Questionnaire on well-being at workBackground - Central Administration

Central Adminis tration

Human Resources and Legal Affairs

Education

Financ ial Affairs

Research

Communications and Community Relations

Univ ers ity Museum

Univers ity Management

Planning and Community Relations

Adminis trative Serv ices

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

12%

20%

22%

20%

5%

8%

2%

1%

3%

8%

All (Mean: 3.905, Dev iation: 2.698) (Responses : 348)

Page 19: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Your job

1 . My j ob d escr i p ti o n i s c l ea r an d I und e rstand my g oa l s

2 . My j ob i s su i tab l y ch a l l en g i ng

3 . I have e no ug h t ime to ca rry ou t my du ti e s du r i n g work i ng ho u rs

4 . I am ab l e to con cen tra te o n my j o b w i tho u t un du e d i s tu rba nce s

5 . I ha ve e no ug h i n f l ue nce o ve r my o wn j ob an d du ti e s

6 . Ch an ges a t wo rk d o n o t l e ssen my a b i l i ty to co pe a t w o rk

7 . I ha ve the a pp ro p r i a te too l s

8 . The d i n i ng an d o the r soc ia l a rea s a re a deq ua te

9 . Th e ra ti o b e twe en te ach ing a nd rese a rch wo rk i s sa ti s facto ry

1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5

4 .158

4 .02 8

3 .185

3 .1 48

3 .606

3 .222

3 .824

3 .67 5

3 .438

Al l

Page 20: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Managing

10 . The un i ve rs i ty 's s tra tegy i s c l ea r a nd compre he nsib le

11 . The un i ve rs i ty acts op en l y w he n ma king a nd p re pa r i ng d ec i s i o ns

12 . Emp lo yees a re ab le to i n f l u ence the un i ve rs i ty 's d ec i s i on s

13 . The s tra teg y s te e rs the a cti v i t i es and p r imary tasks o f ou r un i t

14 . Me n an d wome n h ave eq ua l opp o r tun i ti es fo r ad va nce me n t i n o u r un i t

15 . Ou r mee ti n g p ra cti ce s a re w e l l su i te d fo r ach iev i ng the un i t 's goa l s

1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5

3 .066

2 .721

2 .4 72

3 .07

3 .741

3 .063

Al l

Page 21: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Supervisory work

16 . My sup erv i so r ma kes su re th a t ou r g oa l s a nd ta sks a re c l ear

17 . My su pe rv i sor reg u la r l y carr i es ou t pe rfo rma nce eva l ua ti on s w i th me

18 . I ge t en o ug h co nstructi ve fe ed ba ck fro m my sup erv i so r

19 . My supe rv i so r trusts me

20 . I d a re to d i sag ree w i th my supe rv i so r

21 . My su pe rvi so r i s i mpa rti a l a nd fa i r

22 . My su pe rv i so r take s the d i ffe re nce s be tw een p eo p le i n to con si de ra ti o n ( fo r i nsta nce reg ard i n g ski l l s , e xp e r i e nce o r a b i l i t i e s)

23 . I te l l my sup e rv i so r abo u t my i d ea s to d e ve lo p our u n i t o r my wo rk

24 . My su pe rvi so r en cou ra ge s me to ma ke su gg esti o ns, take respo nsib i l i ty an d d eve lop my w o rk

1 1 .5 2 2.5 3 3 .5 4 4.5 5

3.271

3 .663

3.2 74

4 .076

4 .015

3.656

3.637

3 .8 77

3.693

Al l

Page 22: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Work community and co-operation

25 . Ou r u n i t i s a d yn a mic commun i ty o f e xpe rts

2 6 . Ou r u n i t has a p o si t i ve a tti tude tow ards deve l opmen t

2 7 . Th e co mmun ica ti o ns p ra cti ce s i n ou r un i t p ro mote e ff i c i en t commun i ca ti on

28 . No neg a ti ve comp e ti t i on b e twe en i nd i v i d ua l s takes p lace i n o u r un i t

29 . Ou r u n i t has a co n structi ve a tti tu d e towa rds hu ma n e rro rs

30 . We h a ve d eve l o ped e ffe cti ve p ro cesses to take u p d i f f i cu l t i ssue s fo r d i scuss io n

3 1 . We sup por t and enco u ra g e ea ch o the r

32 . I t i s e asy fo r me to ask my co l l e ague s fo r h e lp

33 . R umours a nd g oss ip do n o t i n te r fe re w i th w ork

34 . I h ave n o t b een a ta rge t o f w o rkp l a ce b u l l y i n g o r ha ra ssmen t a t w o rk ove r the p ast yea r

1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5

3 .567

3 .62

3 .112

3 .2

3 .51 3

2 .635

3 .55 8

4 .09 5

3 .53

4 .3 3 4

Al l

Page 23: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Competence

3 5 . Job i n trod u cti on s a re ha nd l ed w e l l i n o u r u n i t

36 . Exp e r i en ce an d kno wl e dg e (ski l l s , ne tworks, co n tac ts , f i nd i n g fi n an c ing ) a re sha red sys temati ca l l y be fo re pe op le l ea ve th e u n i t

37 . My sk i l l s ma tch the d e ma nd s o f my jo b

38 . I am a b l e to e ffi c i en tl y ma ke u se o f my sk i l l s i n my wo rk

39 . I ha ve su ff i c i e n t op p or tun i t ie s to d e ve l o p my comp e te n ce

40 . I kno w wh a t sk i l l s w i l l b e requ i re d o f me d u r in g the n ex t fe w yea rs

41 . Kn ow -how i s sha red su ff i c i en tl y b e tw ee n expe r ts

1 1 .5 2 2.5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5

2 .99 6

2 .6 9 3

3 .93 1

3 .947

3 .66 5

3.5 8 8

3 .2 6

Al l

Page 24: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Motivation

42 . My co n tr i bu ti o n i s imp or tan t fo r the success o f my un i t

43 . I h ave ca ree r ad va nce men t o ppo r tu n i t i es a t th e u n i ve rs i ty

44 . I ga in i n cen ti ve fro m th e reward s an d pe rso na l re cog n i t i on I ge t from my un i t

45 . I am ab le to wo rk i nd e pen de n tl y an d free l y

46 . My tasks a re i n te re sti n g a nd cha l l e ng in g

47 . My w ork a l l ows me to be i n ven ti ve /crea ti ve

48 . I ge t a su ffi c i e n t amou n t o f con stru cti ve feedb ack a t wo rk

49 . I g e t supp or t i n comme rc i a l i z i n g a nd d eve lo p i ng a bu si ness ba se d on my f i n d ing s ( i f th i s s ta teme n t do es n o t ap p l y to you , se le ct "n o o p i n io n ")

50 . I g e t supp or t i n fi nd i ng p ro je ct f i n anc i ng ( i f th i s s ta temen t doe s n o t ap p l y to you , se le ct "no o p in io n ")

1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5

3 .981

2 .672

2 .66

4 .23 6

4 .075

4 .091

3 .163

2 .579

3 .1 99

Al l

Page 25: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Health and life situation

51 . I fe e l I h ave a go o d me n ta l wo rk ca p a ci ty

52 . I fee l I h ave a go o d p hysi ca l w o rk ca p ac i ty

53 . Re ti re me n t p lan s a re d i scusse d o p en l y i n my u n i t

54 . My u n i t i s p rep a re d to a ccommod a te peo p l e w i th re duce d wo rk cap ac i ty ( i n te rms o f w o rk ing h ou rs o r ta sks)

55 . My u n i t ta ke s th e ne ce ssa ry mea su re s i n te rms o f fo l l o w i ng u p on si ck l ea ve s

5 6 . The occu pa ti on a l he a l th -ca re se rv i ce s sup p or t the w e l l -be in g o f th e p e rso nne l

57 . Th e co -op e ra ti o n b e tw e en HR , sup e rv i so rs a nd OHS works smoo th ly

1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3.5 4 4 .5 5

3 .8 15

3 .9 9

2.9 73

3 .5 19

3 .06

3 .619

3 .1 15

Al l

Page 26: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

The university's image

58. The qual i ty of research in our uni t

59. The qual i ty of teaching in our uni t

60. Our uni t's success in acqui ring external financing

61. The universi ty's image as an employer

62. The universi ty's attractiveness to students

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

4.036

3.982

3.857

3.343

4.068

Al l

Page 27: Questionnaire on well-being at  work 2011  University of  Helsinki

Means of the divisions

Your job

Manag in

g

Supe r vis

o r y w

or k

Wor k

com

mun it y

and c

o - oper a

t ion

Compe te

nc e

Mot iv

a t ion

Hea lth a

nd lif e

si tu

a t ion

The un iv

e r si ty

' s im

age

MEANS

1

1 .5

2

2 .5

3

3 .5

4

4 .5

5

3 .6

3

3 .73 .5 3 .4 3 .4 3 .4

3 .9

3 .5

All