6
Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]> Question for CPC20164927DA 1 message Hiroyuki Matsuda <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Alejandro, I am a GIS specialist working on making GIS data for ZIMAS, and currently working on the case of CPC20164927DA. I have a question regarding the location of the subject property for this case. The project description says that “See attachment A” for the subject property, and the total lot is 303,443.5 SqFt. (See the attached pdf file.) And the attached map shows only one lot, which is far smaller than the area above. I also looked up the case in the PCTS, which says the related cases of this case are CPC20152025ZCHDMCUPCU ZVSPR and ENV20152026EIR, both areas are 303,443.5 SqFt. I am wondering that the case CPC20164927DA covers the exact same area as its related cases CPC20152025ZC HDMCUPCUZVSPR and ENV20152026EIR? If different, please let me know the subject property/ies for this case. Thank you for paying attention to this matter. Regards, , GIS Specialist Department of City Planning Planning Information Technology T: (213) 9781390 200 N. Spring St., Room 825 Los Angeles, CA. 90012 20164927.pdf 3419K

Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda

Alejandro Huerta <[email protected]>

Question for CPC­2016­4927­DA 1 message

Hiroyuki Matsuda <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:03 AMTo: [email protected]

Alejandro,

I am a GIS specialist working on making GIS data for ZIMAS, and currently working on the case of CPC­2016­4927­DA.

I have a question regarding the location of the subject property for this case.

The project description says that “See attachment A” for the subject property, and the total lot is 303,443.5 SqFt. (Seethe attached pdf file.)

And the attached map shows only one lot, which is far smaller than the area above.

I also looked up the case in the PCTS, which says the related cases of this case are CPC­2015­2025­ZC­HD­MCUP­CU­ZV­SPR and ENV­2015­2026­EIR, both areas are 303,443.5 SqFt.

I am wondering that the case CPC­2016­4927­DA covers the exact same area as its related cases CPC­2015­2025­ZC­HD­MCUP­CU­ZV­SPR and ENV­2015­2026­EIR?

If different, please let me know the subject property/ies for this case.

Thank you for paying attention to this matter.

Regards,

­­ 

Hiroyuki Matsuda, GIS Specialist Department of City PlanningPlanning Information TechnologyT: (213) 978­1390200 N. Spring St., Room 825Los Angeles, CA. 90012

2016­4927.pdf3419K

Page 2: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda
Page 3: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda
Page 4: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda
Page 5: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda
Page 6: Question for CPC20164927DA - LA City Planning...Jan 20, 2017  · Alejandro Huerta  Question for CPC20164927DA 1 m es s age Hiroyuki Matsuda